Diagrams.Solve.Polynomial:quartForm from diagrams-solve-0.1, C

Percentage Accurate: 97.7% → 98.5%

Time: 11.1s

Alternatives: 10

Speedup: 0.5×

• 32.7% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (- (+ (* x y) (/ (* z t) 16.0)) (/ (* a b) 4.0)) c))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c) {
	return (((x * y) + ((z * t) / 16.0)) - ((a * b) / 4.0)) + c;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    code = (((x * y) + ((z * t) / 16.0d0)) - ((a * b) / 4.0d0)) + c
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c) {
	return (((x * y) + ((z * t) / 16.0)) - ((a * b) / 4.0)) + c;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c):
	return (((x * y) + ((z * t) / 16.0)) - ((a * b) / 4.0)) + c

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(Float64(z * t) / 16.0)) - Float64(Float64(a * b) / 4.0)) + c)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
	tmp = (((x * y) + ((z * t) / 16.0)) - ((a * b) / 4.0)) + c;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision] / 16.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] / 4.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + c), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 97.7% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (- (+ (* x y) (/ (* z t) 16.0)) (/ (* a b) 4.0)) c))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c) {
	return (((x * y) + ((z * t) / 16.0)) - ((a * b) / 4.0)) + c;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    code = (((x * y) + ((z * t) / 16.0d0)) - ((a * b) / 4.0d0)) + c
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c) {
	return (((x * y) + ((z * t) / 16.0)) - ((a * b) / 4.0)) + c;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c):
	return (((x * y) + ((z * t) / 16.0)) - ((a * b) / 4.0)) + c

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(Float64(z * t) / 16.0)) - Float64(Float64(a * b) / 4.0)) + c)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
	tmp = (((x * y) + ((z * t) / 16.0)) - ((a * b) / 4.0)) + c;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision] / 16.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] / 4.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + c), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 98.5% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4} \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;c + \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot \frac{t}{16}\right) - a \cdot \frac{b}{4}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;c + x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (- (+ (* x y) (/ (* z t) 16.0)) (/ (* a b) 4.0)) INFINITY)
   (+ c (- (fma x y (* z (/ t 16.0))) (* a (/ b 4.0))))
   (+ c (* x y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c) {
	double tmp;
	if ((((x * y) + ((z * t) / 16.0)) - ((a * b) / 4.0)) <= ((double) INFINITY)) {
		tmp = c + (fma(x, y, (z * (t / 16.0))) - (a * (b / 4.0)));
	} else {
		tmp = c + (x * y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(Float64(z * t) / 16.0)) - Float64(Float64(a * b) / 4.0)) <= Inf)
		tmp = Float64(c + Float64(fma(x, y, Float64(z * Float64(t / 16.0))) - Float64(a * Float64(b / 4.0))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(c + Float64(x * y));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_] := If[LessEqual[N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision] / 16.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] / 4.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], Infinity], N[(c + N[(N[(x * y + N[(z * N[(t / 16.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(a * N[(b / 4.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(c + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (-.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (/.f64 (*.f64 z t) #s(literal 16 binary64))) (/.f64 (*.f64 a b) #s(literal 4 binary64))) < +inf.0

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l- 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \left(\frac{a \cdot b}{4} - c\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot y + \frac{\color{blue}{t \cdot z}}{16}\right) - \left(\frac{a \cdot b}{4} - c\right) \]

      3. associate-+l- 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot y + \frac{t \cdot z}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c} \]

      4. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \frac{t \cdot z}{16}\right)} - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \]

      5. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot t}}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \]

      6. associate-/l* 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{z \cdot \frac{t}{16}}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \]

      7. associate-/l* 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot \frac{t}{16}\right) - \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{b}{4}}\right) + c \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot \frac{t}{16}\right) - a \cdot \frac{b}{4}\right) + c} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   if +inf.0 < (-.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (/.f64 (*.f64 z t) #s(literal 16 binary64))) (/.f64 (*.f64 a b) #s(literal 4 binary64)))

   1. Initial program 0.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 45.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} + c \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4} \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;c + \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot \frac{t}{16}\right) - a \cdot \frac{b}{4}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;c + x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 98.9% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \frac{t}{16}, \frac{a \cdot b}{-4}\right)\right) + c \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (fma x y (fma z (/ t 16.0) (/ (* a b) -4.0))) c))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c) {
	return fma(x, y, fma(z, (t / 16.0), ((a * b) / -4.0))) + c;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
	return Float64(fma(x, y, fma(z, Float64(t / 16.0), Float64(Float64(a * b) / -4.0))) + c)
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_] := N[(N[(x * y + N[(z * N[(t / 16.0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] / -4.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + c), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 96.5%

   \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate--l+ 96.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + \left(\frac{z \cdot t}{16} - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right)\right)} + c \]

   2. fma-define 96.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \frac{z \cdot t}{16} - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right)} + c \]

   3. associate-/l* 96.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{z \cdot \frac{t}{16}} - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \]

   4. fma-neg 97.7%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \frac{t}{16}, -\frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right)}\right) + c \]

   5. distribute-neg-frac2 97.7%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \frac{t}{16}, \color{blue}{\frac{a \cdot b}{-4}}\right)\right) + c \]

   6. metadata-eval 97.7%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \frac{t}{16}, \frac{a \cdot b}{\color{blue}{-4}}\right)\right) + c \]

3. Simplified 97.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \frac{t}{16}, \frac{a \cdot b}{-4}\right)\right) + c} \]
4. Add Preprocessing
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 98.4% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_1 \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;c + t\_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;c + x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (- (+ (* x y) (/ (* z t) 16.0)) (/ (* a b) 4.0))))
   (if (<= t_1 INFINITY) (+ c t_1) (+ c (* x y)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c) {
	double t_1 = ((x * y) + ((z * t) / 16.0)) - ((a * b) / 4.0);
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= ((double) INFINITY)) {
		tmp = c + t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = c + (x * y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c) {
	double t_1 = ((x * y) + ((z * t) / 16.0)) - ((a * b) / 4.0);
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= Double.POSITIVE_INFINITY) {
		tmp = c + t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = c + (x * y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c):
	t_1 = ((x * y) + ((z * t) / 16.0)) - ((a * b) / 4.0)
	tmp = 0
	if t_1 <= math.inf:
		tmp = c + t_1
	else:
		tmp = c + (x * y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(Float64(z * t) / 16.0)) - Float64(Float64(a * b) / 4.0))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_1 <= Inf)
		tmp = Float64(c + t_1);
	else
		tmp = Float64(c + Float64(x * y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
	t_1 = ((x * y) + ((z * t) / 16.0)) - ((a * b) / 4.0);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t_1 <= Inf)
		tmp = c + t_1;
	else
		tmp = c + (x * y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision] / 16.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] / 4.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$1, Infinity], N[(c + t$95$1), $MachinePrecision], N[(c + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (-.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (/.f64 (*.f64 z t) #s(literal 16 binary64))) (/.f64 (*.f64 a b) #s(literal 4 binary64))) < +inf.0

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   if +inf.0 < (-.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (/.f64 (*.f64 z t) #s(literal 16 binary64))) (/.f64 (*.f64 a b) #s(literal 4 binary64)))

   1. Initial program 0.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 45.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} + c \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4} \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;c + \left(\left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;c + x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 41.7% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -1.3 \cdot 10^{+66}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq -1.12 \cdot 10^{-185}:\\ \;\;\;\;c\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 3.35 \cdot 10^{-242}:\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot \left(a \cdot -0.25\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 5.2 \cdot 10^{+167}:\\ \;\;\;\;c\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* x y) -1.3e+66)
   (* x y)
   (if (<= (* x y) -1.12e-185)
     c
     (if (<= (* x y) 3.35e-242)
       (* b (* a -0.25))
       (if (<= (* x y) 5.2e+167) c (* x y))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -1.3e+66) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else if ((x * y) <= -1.12e-185) {
		tmp = c;
	} else if ((x * y) <= 3.35e-242) {
		tmp = b * (a * -0.25);
	} else if ((x * y) <= 5.2e+167) {
		tmp = c;
	} else {
		tmp = x * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x * y) <= (-1.3d+66)) then
        tmp = x * y
    else if ((x * y) <= (-1.12d-185)) then
        tmp = c
    else if ((x * y) <= 3.35d-242) then
        tmp = b * (a * (-0.25d0))
    else if ((x * y) <= 5.2d+167) then
        tmp = c
    else
        tmp = x * y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -1.3e+66) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else if ((x * y) <= -1.12e-185) {
		tmp = c;
	} else if ((x * y) <= 3.35e-242) {
		tmp = b * (a * -0.25);
	} else if ((x * y) <= 5.2e+167) {
		tmp = c;
	} else {
		tmp = x * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c):
	tmp = 0
	if (x * y) <= -1.3e+66:
		tmp = x * y
	elif (x * y) <= -1.12e-185:
		tmp = c
	elif (x * y) <= 3.35e-242:
		tmp = b * (a * -0.25)
	elif (x * y) <= 5.2e+167:
		tmp = c
	else:
		tmp = x * y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(x * y) <= -1.3e+66)
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= -1.12e-185)
		tmp = c;
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= 3.35e-242)
		tmp = Float64(b * Float64(a * -0.25));
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= 5.2e+167)
		tmp = c;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x * y) <= -1.3e+66)
		tmp = x * y;
	elseif ((x * y) <= -1.12e-185)
		tmp = c;
	elseif ((x * y) <= 3.35e-242)
		tmp = b * (a * -0.25);
	elseif ((x * y) <= 5.2e+167)
		tmp = c;
	else
		tmp = x * y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_] := If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -1.3e+66], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -1.12e-185], c, If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 3.35e-242], N[(b * N[(a * -0.25), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 5.2e+167], c, N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -1.30000000000000006e66 or 5.2000000000000004e167 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 93.8%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 93.7%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + 0.0625 \cdot \frac{t \cdot z}{y}\right)} - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \]

   4. Taylor expanded in a around 0 83.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + 0.0625 \cdot \frac{t \cdot z}{y}\right)} + c \]

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 72.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]

   if -1.30000000000000006e66 < (*.f64 x y) < -1.11999999999999993e-185 or 3.35000000000000015e-242 < (*.f64 x y) < 5.2000000000000004e167

   1. Initial program 98.2%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in c around inf 43.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c} \]

   if -1.11999999999999993e-185 < (*.f64 x y) < 3.35000000000000015e-242

   1. Initial program 96.8%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around inf 70.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-0.25 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} + c \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 70.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot -0.25} + c \]

      2. associate-*r* 70.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(b \cdot -0.25\right)} + c \]

   5. Simplified 70.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(b \cdot -0.25\right)} + c \]

   6. Taylor expanded in b around inf 65.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot a + \frac{c}{b}\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in a around inf 46.6%

      \[\leadsto b \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-0.25 \cdot a\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 53.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -1.3 \cdot 10^{+66}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq -1.12 \cdot 10^{-185}:\\ \;\;\;\;c\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 3.35 \cdot 10^{-242}:\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot \left(a \cdot -0.25\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 5.2 \cdot 10^{+167}:\\ \;\;\;\;c\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 65.0% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+106} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+189}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + 0.0625 \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;c + a \cdot \left(b \cdot -0.25\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* x y) -1e+106) (not (<= (* x y) 4e+189)))
   (+ (* x y) (* 0.0625 (* z t)))
   (+ c (* a (* b -0.25)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x * y) <= -1e+106) || !((x * y) <= 4e+189)) {
		tmp = (x * y) + (0.0625 * (z * t));
	} else {
		tmp = c + (a * (b * -0.25));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((x * y) <= (-1d+106)) .or. (.not. ((x * y) <= 4d+189))) then
        tmp = (x * y) + (0.0625d0 * (z * t))
    else
        tmp = c + (a * (b * (-0.25d0)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x * y) <= -1e+106) || !((x * y) <= 4e+189)) {
		tmp = (x * y) + (0.0625 * (z * t));
	} else {
		tmp = c + (a * (b * -0.25));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c):
	tmp = 0
	if ((x * y) <= -1e+106) or not ((x * y) <= 4e+189):
		tmp = (x * y) + (0.0625 * (z * t))
	else:
		tmp = c + (a * (b * -0.25))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(x * y) <= -1e+106) || !(Float64(x * y) <= 4e+189))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(0.0625 * Float64(z * t)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(c + Float64(a * Float64(b * -0.25)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((x * y) <= -1e+106) || ~(((x * y) <= 4e+189)))
		tmp = (x * y) + (0.0625 * (z * t));
	else
		tmp = c + (a * (b * -0.25));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -1e+106], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 4e+189]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(0.0625 * N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(c + N[(a * N[(b * -0.25), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -1.00000000000000009e106 or 4.0000000000000001e189 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 92.8%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0 87.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(0.0625 \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right) + x \cdot y\right)} + c \]

   4. Taylor expanded in c around 0 85.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.0625 \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right) + x \cdot y} \]

   if -1.00000000000000009e106 < (*.f64 x y) < 4.0000000000000001e189

   1. Initial program 97.8%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around inf 69.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-0.25 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} + c \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 69.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot -0.25} + c \]

      2. associate-*r* 69.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(b \cdot -0.25\right)} + c \]

   5. Simplified 69.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(b \cdot -0.25\right)} + c \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 74.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+106} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+189}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + 0.0625 \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;c + a \cdot \left(b \cdot -0.25\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 77.6% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -7.5 \cdot 10^{+156} \lor \neg \left(a \leq 9500000\right):\\ \;\;\;\;c + a \cdot \left(b \cdot -0.25\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;c + \left(x \cdot y + 0.0625 \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= a -7.5e+156) (not (<= a 9500000.0)))
   (+ c (* a (* b -0.25)))
   (+ c (+ (* x y) (* 0.0625 (* z t))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c) {
	double tmp;
	if ((a <= -7.5e+156) || !(a <= 9500000.0)) {
		tmp = c + (a * (b * -0.25));
	} else {
		tmp = c + ((x * y) + (0.0625 * (z * t)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((a <= (-7.5d+156)) .or. (.not. (a <= 9500000.0d0))) then
        tmp = c + (a * (b * (-0.25d0)))
    else
        tmp = c + ((x * y) + (0.0625d0 * (z * t)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c) {
	double tmp;
	if ((a <= -7.5e+156) || !(a <= 9500000.0)) {
		tmp = c + (a * (b * -0.25));
	} else {
		tmp = c + ((x * y) + (0.0625 * (z * t)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c):
	tmp = 0
	if (a <= -7.5e+156) or not (a <= 9500000.0):
		tmp = c + (a * (b * -0.25))
	else:
		tmp = c + ((x * y) + (0.0625 * (z * t)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((a <= -7.5e+156) || !(a <= 9500000.0))
		tmp = Float64(c + Float64(a * Float64(b * -0.25)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(c + Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(0.0625 * Float64(z * t))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((a <= -7.5e+156) || ~((a <= 9500000.0)))
		tmp = c + (a * (b * -0.25));
	else
		tmp = c + ((x * y) + (0.0625 * (z * t)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_] := If[Or[LessEqual[a, -7.5e+156], N[Not[LessEqual[a, 9500000.0]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(c + N[(a * N[(b * -0.25), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(c + N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(0.0625 * N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if a < -7.50000000000000026e156 or 9.5e6 < a

   1. Initial program 93.7%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around inf 70.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-0.25 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} + c \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 70.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot -0.25} + c \]

      2. associate-*r* 70.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(b \cdot -0.25\right)} + c \]

   5. Simplified 70.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(b \cdot -0.25\right)} + c \]

   if -7.50000000000000026e156 < a < 9.5e6

   1. Initial program 98.1%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0 84.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(0.0625 \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right) + x \cdot y\right)} + c \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 79.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -7.5 \cdot 10^{+156} \lor \neg \left(a \leq 9500000\right):\\ \;\;\;\;c + a \cdot \left(b \cdot -0.25\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;c + \left(x \cdot y + 0.0625 \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 64.0% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -3.5 \cdot 10^{+94} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq 0.32\right):\\ \;\;\;\;c + x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;c + a \cdot \left(b \cdot -0.25\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* x y) -3.5e+94) (not (<= (* x y) 0.32)))
   (+ c (* x y))
   (+ c (* a (* b -0.25)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x * y) <= -3.5e+94) || !((x * y) <= 0.32)) {
		tmp = c + (x * y);
	} else {
		tmp = c + (a * (b * -0.25));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((x * y) <= (-3.5d+94)) .or. (.not. ((x * y) <= 0.32d0))) then
        tmp = c + (x * y)
    else
        tmp = c + (a * (b * (-0.25d0)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x * y) <= -3.5e+94) || !((x * y) <= 0.32)) {
		tmp = c + (x * y);
	} else {
		tmp = c + (a * (b * -0.25));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c):
	tmp = 0
	if ((x * y) <= -3.5e+94) or not ((x * y) <= 0.32):
		tmp = c + (x * y)
	else:
		tmp = c + (a * (b * -0.25))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(x * y) <= -3.5e+94) || !(Float64(x * y) <= 0.32))
		tmp = Float64(c + Float64(x * y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(c + Float64(a * Float64(b * -0.25)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((x * y) <= -3.5e+94) || ~(((x * y) <= 0.32)))
		tmp = c + (x * y);
	else
		tmp = c + (a * (b * -0.25));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -3.5e+94], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 0.32]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(c + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(c + N[(a * N[(b * -0.25), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -3.4999999999999997e94 or 0.320000000000000007 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 95.2%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 75.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} + c \]

   if -3.4999999999999997e94 < (*.f64 x y) < 0.320000000000000007

   1. Initial program 97.4%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around inf 71.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-0.25 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} + c \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 71.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot -0.25} + c \]

      2. associate-*r* 71.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(b \cdot -0.25\right)} + c \]

   5. Simplified 71.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(b \cdot -0.25\right)} + c \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 73.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -3.5 \cdot 10^{+94} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq 0.32\right):\\ \;\;\;\;c + x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;c + a \cdot \left(b \cdot -0.25\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 40.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -1.6 \cdot 10^{+67} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq 1.02 \cdot 10^{+161}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;c\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* x y) -1.6e+67) (not (<= (* x y) 1.02e+161))) (* x y) c))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x * y) <= -1.6e+67) || !((x * y) <= 1.02e+161)) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = c;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((x * y) <= (-1.6d+67)) .or. (.not. ((x * y) <= 1.02d+161))) then
        tmp = x * y
    else
        tmp = c
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x * y) <= -1.6e+67) || !((x * y) <= 1.02e+161)) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = c;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c):
	tmp = 0
	if ((x * y) <= -1.6e+67) or not ((x * y) <= 1.02e+161):
		tmp = x * y
	else:
		tmp = c
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(x * y) <= -1.6e+67) || !(Float64(x * y) <= 1.02e+161))
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	else
		tmp = c;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((x * y) <= -1.6e+67) || ~(((x * y) <= 1.02e+161)))
		tmp = x * y;
	else
		tmp = c;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -1.6e+67], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 1.02e+161]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], c]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -1.59999999999999991e67 or 1.02e161 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 93.8%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 93.7%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + 0.0625 \cdot \frac{t \cdot z}{y}\right)} - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \]

   4. Taylor expanded in a around 0 83.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + 0.0625 \cdot \frac{t \cdot z}{y}\right)} + c \]

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 72.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]

   if -1.59999999999999991e67 < (*.f64 x y) < 1.02e161

   1. Initial program 97.7%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in c around inf 37.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 48.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -1.6 \cdot 10^{+67} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq 1.02 \cdot 10^{+161}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;c\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 54.9% accurate, 1.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -3.9 \cdot 10^{+130} \lor \neg \left(a \leq 9500000\right):\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot \left(a \cdot -0.25\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;c + x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= a -3.9e+130) (not (<= a 9500000.0)))
   (* b (* a -0.25))
   (+ c (* x y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c) {
	double tmp;
	if ((a <= -3.9e+130) || !(a <= 9500000.0)) {
		tmp = b * (a * -0.25);
	} else {
		tmp = c + (x * y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((a <= (-3.9d+130)) .or. (.not. (a <= 9500000.0d0))) then
        tmp = b * (a * (-0.25d0))
    else
        tmp = c + (x * y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c) {
	double tmp;
	if ((a <= -3.9e+130) || !(a <= 9500000.0)) {
		tmp = b * (a * -0.25);
	} else {
		tmp = c + (x * y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c):
	tmp = 0
	if (a <= -3.9e+130) or not (a <= 9500000.0):
		tmp = b * (a * -0.25)
	else:
		tmp = c + (x * y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((a <= -3.9e+130) || !(a <= 9500000.0))
		tmp = Float64(b * Float64(a * -0.25));
	else
		tmp = Float64(c + Float64(x * y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((a <= -3.9e+130) || ~((a <= 9500000.0)))
		tmp = b * (a * -0.25);
	else
		tmp = c + (x * y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_] := If[Or[LessEqual[a, -3.9e+130], N[Not[LessEqual[a, 9500000.0]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(b * N[(a * -0.25), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(c + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if a < -3.9000000000000002e130 or 9.5e6 < a

   1. Initial program 94.4%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around inf 68.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-0.25 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} + c \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 68.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot -0.25} + c \]

      2. associate-*r* 68.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(b \cdot -0.25\right)} + c \]

   5. Simplified 68.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(b \cdot -0.25\right)} + c \]

   6. Taylor expanded in b around inf 61.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot a + \frac{c}{b}\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in a around inf 50.3%

      \[\leadsto b \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-0.25 \cdot a\right)} \]

   if -3.9000000000000002e130 < a < 9.5e6

   1. Initial program 98.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 65.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} + c \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 59.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -3.9 \cdot 10^{+130} \lor \neg \left(a \leq 9500000\right):\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot \left(a \cdot -0.25\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;c + x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 22.2% accurate, 17.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ c \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c) :precision binary64 c)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c) {
	return c;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    code = c
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c) {
	return c;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c):
	return c

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
	return c
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
	tmp = c;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_] := c

Derivation

1. Initial program 96.5%

   \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in c around inf 27.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024137 
(FPCore (x y z t a b c)
  :name "Diagrams.Solve.Polynomial:quartForm  from diagrams-solve-0.1, C"
  :precision binary64
  (+ (- (+ (* x y) (/ (* z t) 16.0)) (/ (* a b) 4.0)) c))