Numeric.Log:$cexpm1 from log-domain-0.10.2.1, B

Percentage Accurate: 100.0% → 100.0%

Time: 2.7s

Alternatives: 7

Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x \cdot y + x\right) + y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (+ (+ (* x y) x) y))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return ((x * y) + x) + y;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = ((x * y) + x) + y
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return ((x * y) + x) + y;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	return ((x * y) + x) + y

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + x) + y)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = ((x * y) + x) + y;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision] + y), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x \cdot y + x\right) + y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (+ (+ (* x y) x) y))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return ((x * y) + x) + y;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = ((x * y) + x) + y
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return ((x * y) + x) + y;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	return ((x * y) + x) + y

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + x) + y)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = ((x * y) + x) + y;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision] + y), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(y + 1, x, y\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (fma (+ y 1.0) x y))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return fma((y + 1.0), x, y);
}

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return fma(Float64(y + 1.0), x, y)
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := N[(N[(y + 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * x + y), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[\left(x \cdot y + x\right) + y \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + x\right) + y \]

   2. distribute-lft1-in 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + 1\right) \cdot x} + y \]

   3. fma-define 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y + 1, x, y\right)} \]

3. Simplified 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y + 1, x, y\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 70.0% accurate, 0.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -7 \cdot 10^{-26}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(y + 1\right) \cdot x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -1.22 \cdot 10^{-72}:\\ \;\;\;\;y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -3.4 \cdot 10^{-190}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 1:\\ \;\;\;\;y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -7e-26)
   (* (+ y 1.0) x)
   (if (<= x -1.22e-72) y (if (<= x -3.4e-190) x (if (<= x 1.0) y (* y x))))))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -7e-26) {
		tmp = (y + 1.0) * x;
	} else if (x <= -1.22e-72) {
		tmp = y;
	} else if (x <= -3.4e-190) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (x <= 1.0) {
		tmp = y;
	} else {
		tmp = y * x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-7d-26)) then
        tmp = (y + 1.0d0) * x
    else if (x <= (-1.22d-72)) then
        tmp = y
    else if (x <= (-3.4d-190)) then
        tmp = x
    else if (x <= 1.0d0) then
        tmp = y
    else
        tmp = y * x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -7e-26) {
		tmp = (y + 1.0) * x;
	} else if (x <= -1.22e-72) {
		tmp = y;
	} else if (x <= -3.4e-190) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (x <= 1.0) {
		tmp = y;
	} else {
		tmp = y * x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -7e-26:
		tmp = (y + 1.0) * x
	elif x <= -1.22e-72:
		tmp = y
	elif x <= -3.4e-190:
		tmp = x
	elif x <= 1.0:
		tmp = y
	else:
		tmp = y * x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -7e-26)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(y + 1.0) * x);
	elseif (x <= -1.22e-72)
		tmp = y;
	elseif (x <= -3.4e-190)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (x <= 1.0)
		tmp = y;
	else
		tmp = Float64(y * x);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -7e-26)
		tmp = (y + 1.0) * x;
	elseif (x <= -1.22e-72)
		tmp = y;
	elseif (x <= -3.4e-190)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (x <= 1.0)
		tmp = y;
	else
		tmp = y * x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := If[LessEqual[x, -7e-26], N[(N[(y + 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[x, -1.22e-72], y, If[LessEqual[x, -3.4e-190], x, If[LessEqual[x, 1.0], y, N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 4 regimes

2. if x < -6.9999999999999997e-26

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + x\right) + y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 97.6%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y + 1\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + 1\right)} \]

   if -6.9999999999999997e-26 < x < -1.2200000000000001e-72 or -3.39999999999999981e-190 < x < 1

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + x\right) + y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 77.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y} \]

   if -1.2200000000000001e-72 < x < -3.39999999999999981e-190

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + x\right) + y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 52.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if 1 < x

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + x\right) + y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.6%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y + 1\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + 1\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around inf 45.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
3. Recombined 4 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 73.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -7 \cdot 10^{-26}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(y + 1\right) \cdot x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -1.22 \cdot 10^{-72}:\\ \;\;\;\;y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -3.4 \cdot 10^{-190}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 1:\\ \;\;\;\;y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 61.9% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 2.95 \cdot 10^{-53}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -1.0) (* y x) (if (<= y 2.95e-53) x y)))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -1.0) {
		tmp = y * x;
	} else if (y <= 2.95e-53) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= (-1.0d0)) then
        tmp = y * x
    else if (y <= 2.95d-53) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -1.0) {
		tmp = y * x;
	} else if (y <= 2.95e-53) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -1.0:
		tmp = y * x
	elif y <= 2.95e-53:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -1.0)
		tmp = Float64(y * x);
	elseif (y <= 2.95e-53)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = y;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -1.0)
		tmp = y * x;
	elseif (y <= 2.95e-53)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := If[LessEqual[y, -1.0], N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, 2.95e-53], x, y]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if y < -1

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + x\right) + y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 58.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 58.6%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y + 1\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 58.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + 1\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around inf 55.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]

   if -1 < y < 2.95e-53

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + x\right) + y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 84.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if 2.95e-53 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + x\right) + y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 48.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 68.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 2.95 \cdot 10^{-53}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 74.1% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 8.8 \cdot 10^{-54}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(y + 1\right) \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(1 + x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 8.8e-54) (* (+ y 1.0) x) (* y (+ 1.0 x))))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 8.8e-54) {
		tmp = (y + 1.0) * x;
	} else {
		tmp = y * (1.0 + x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 8.8d-54) then
        tmp = (y + 1.0d0) * x
    else
        tmp = y * (1.0d0 + x)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 8.8e-54) {
		tmp = (y + 1.0) * x;
	} else {
		tmp = y * (1.0 + x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 8.8e-54:
		tmp = (y + 1.0) * x
	else:
		tmp = y * (1.0 + x)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 8.8e-54)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(y + 1.0) * x);
	else
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(1.0 + x));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 8.8e-54)
		tmp = (y + 1.0) * x;
	else
		tmp = y * (1.0 + x);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := If[LessEqual[y, 8.8e-54], N[(N[(y + 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision], N[(y * N[(1.0 + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 8.7999999999999998e-54

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + x\right) + y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 76.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 76.8%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y + 1\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 76.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + 1\right)} \]

   if 8.7999999999999998e-54 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + x\right) + y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 93.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(1 + x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 81.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 8.8 \cdot 10^{-54}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(y + 1\right) \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(1 + x\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ y + \left(x + y \cdot x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (+ y (+ x (* y x))))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return y + (x + (y * x));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = y + (x + (y * x))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return y + (x + (y * x));
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	return y + (x + (y * x))

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return Float64(y + Float64(x + Float64(y * x)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = y + (x + (y * x));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := N[(y + N[(x + N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[\left(x \cdot y + x\right) + y \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto y + \left(x + y \cdot x\right) \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 49.5% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 8 \cdot 10^{-52}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (if (<= y 8e-52) x y))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 8e-52) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 8d-52) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 8e-52) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 8e-52:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 8e-52)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = y;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 8e-52)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := If[LessEqual[y, 8e-52], x, y]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 8.0000000000000001e-52

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + x\right) + y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 59.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if 8.0000000000000001e-52 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + x\right) + y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 48.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 38.8% accurate, 7.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[\left(x \cdot y + x\right) + y \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 45.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024137 
(FPCore (x y)
  :name "Numeric.Log:$cexpm1 from log-domain-0.10.2.1, B"
  :precision binary64
  (+ (+ (* x y) x) y))