System.Random.MWC.Distributions:gamma from mwc-random-0.13.3.2

Percentage Accurate: 99.9% → 99.9%

Time: 10.3s

Alternatives: 7

Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* x 0.5) (* y (+ (- 1.0 z) (log z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * 0.5) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + log(z)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * 0.5d0) + (y * ((1.0d0 - z) + log(z)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * 0.5) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + Math.log(z)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * 0.5) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + math.log(z)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * 0.5) + Float64(y * Float64(Float64(1.0 - z) + log(z))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * 0.5) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + log(z)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * N[(N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision] + N[Log[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* x 0.5) (* y (+ (- 1.0 z) (log z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * 0.5) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + log(z)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * 0.5d0) + (y * ((1.0d0 - z) + log(z)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * 0.5) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + Math.log(z)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * 0.5) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + math.log(z)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * 0.5) + Float64(y * Float64(Float64(1.0 - z) + log(z))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * 0.5) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + log(z)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * N[(N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision] + N[Log[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.9% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \left(1 - z\right) + \log z, x \cdot 0.5\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (fma y (+ (- 1.0 z) (log z)) (* x 0.5)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return fma(y, ((1.0 - z) + log(z)), (x * 0.5));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return fma(y, Float64(Float64(1.0 - z) + log(z)), Float64(x * 0.5))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(y * N[(N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision] + N[Log[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) + x \cdot 0.5} \]

   2. fma-define 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \left(1 - z\right) + \log z, x \cdot 0.5\right)} \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \left(1 - z\right) + \log z, x \cdot 0.5\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 84.3% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot 0.5 \leq -1 \cdot 10^{-36} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot 0.5 \leq 10^{-141}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 0.5 - y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(\left(1 + \log z\right) - z\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* x 0.5) -1e-36) (not (<= (* x 0.5) 1e-141)))
   (- (* x 0.5) (* y z))
   (* y (- (+ 1.0 (log z)) z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x * 0.5) <= -1e-36) || !((x * 0.5) <= 1e-141)) {
		tmp = (x * 0.5) - (y * z);
	} else {
		tmp = y * ((1.0 + log(z)) - z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((x * 0.5d0) <= (-1d-36)) .or. (.not. ((x * 0.5d0) <= 1d-141))) then
        tmp = (x * 0.5d0) - (y * z)
    else
        tmp = y * ((1.0d0 + log(z)) - z)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x * 0.5) <= -1e-36) || !((x * 0.5) <= 1e-141)) {
		tmp = (x * 0.5) - (y * z);
	} else {
		tmp = y * ((1.0 + Math.log(z)) - z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if ((x * 0.5) <= -1e-36) or not ((x * 0.5) <= 1e-141):
		tmp = (x * 0.5) - (y * z)
	else:
		tmp = y * ((1.0 + math.log(z)) - z)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(x * 0.5) <= -1e-36) || !(Float64(x * 0.5) <= 1e-141))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * 0.5) - Float64(y * z));
	else
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(Float64(1.0 + log(z)) - z));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((x * 0.5) <= -1e-36) || ~(((x * 0.5) <= 1e-141)))
		tmp = (x * 0.5) - (y * z);
	else
		tmp = y * ((1.0 + log(z)) - z);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision], -1e-36], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision], 1e-141]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(y * N[(N[(1.0 + N[Log[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x #s(literal 1/2 binary64)) < -9.9999999999999994e-37 or 1e-141 < (*.f64 x #s(literal 1/2 binary64))

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 86.1%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 86.1%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot y\right) \cdot z} \]

      2. neg-mul-1 86.1%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} \cdot z \]

   5. Simplified 86.1%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot z} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. add-sqr-sqrt 40.9%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{-y} \cdot \sqrt{-y}\right)} \cdot z \]

      2. sqrt-unprod 64.2%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\sqrt{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(-y\right)}} \cdot z \]

      3. sqr-neg 64.2%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot y}} \cdot z \]

      4. sqrt-unprod 27.5%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{y} \cdot \sqrt{y}\right)} \cdot z \]

      5. add-sqr-sqrt 54.8%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{y} \cdot z \]

      6. cancel-sign-sub 54.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot 0.5 - \left(-y\right) \cdot z} \]

      7. *-commutative 54.8%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 - \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(-y\right)} \]

      8. add-sqr-sqrt 27.3%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 - z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{-y} \cdot \sqrt{-y}\right)} \]

      9. sqrt-unprod 67.4%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 - z \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(-y\right)}} \]

      10. sqr-neg 67.4%

          \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 - z \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot y}} \]

      11. sqrt-unprod 45.1%

          \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 - z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{y} \cdot \sqrt{y}\right)} \]

      12. add-sqr-sqrt 86.1%

          \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 - z \cdot \color{blue}{y} \]

   7. Applied egg-rr 86.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot 0.5 - z \cdot y} \]

   if -9.9999999999999994e-37 < (*.f64 x #s(literal 1/2 binary64)) < 1e-141

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(\left(1 + \left(\log z + 0.5 \cdot \frac{x}{y}\right)\right) - z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 93.5%

      \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(1 + \log z\right) - z\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 88.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot 0.5 \leq -1 \cdot 10^{-36} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot 0.5 \leq 10^{-141}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 0.5 - y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(\left(1 + \log z\right) - z\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 98.7% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq 0.28:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(1 + \log z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 0.5 - y \cdot z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z 0.28) (+ (* x 0.5) (* y (+ 1.0 (log z)))) (- (* x 0.5) (* y z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= 0.28) {
		tmp = (x * 0.5) + (y * (1.0 + log(z)));
	} else {
		tmp = (x * 0.5) - (y * z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= 0.28d0) then
        tmp = (x * 0.5d0) + (y * (1.0d0 + log(z)))
    else
        tmp = (x * 0.5d0) - (y * z)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= 0.28) {
		tmp = (x * 0.5) + (y * (1.0 + Math.log(z)));
	} else {
		tmp = (x * 0.5) - (y * z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= 0.28:
		tmp = (x * 0.5) + (y * (1.0 + math.log(z)))
	else:
		tmp = (x * 0.5) - (y * z)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= 0.28)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * 0.5) + Float64(y * Float64(1.0 + log(z))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * 0.5) - Float64(y * z));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= 0.28)
		tmp = (x * 0.5) + (y * (1.0 + log(z)));
	else
		tmp = (x * 0.5) - (y * z);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[z, 0.28], N[(N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * N[(1.0 + N[Log[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < 0.28000000000000003

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 98.4%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(1 + \log z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 98.4%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(1 + \log z\right) \cdot y} \]

   5. Simplified 98.4%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(1 + \log z\right) \cdot y} \]

   if 0.28000000000000003 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 98.0%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 98.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot y\right) \cdot z} \]

      2. neg-mul-1 98.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} \cdot z \]

   5. Simplified 98.0%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot z} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. add-sqr-sqrt 45.7%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{-y} \cdot \sqrt{-y}\right)} \cdot z \]

      2. sqrt-unprod 54.2%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\sqrt{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(-y\right)}} \cdot z \]

      3. sqr-neg 54.2%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot y}} \cdot z \]

      4. sqrt-unprod 17.1%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{y} \cdot \sqrt{y}\right)} \cdot z \]

      5. add-sqr-sqrt 30.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{y} \cdot z \]

      6. cancel-sign-sub 30.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot 0.5 - \left(-y\right) \cdot z} \]

      7. *-commutative 30.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 - \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(-y\right)} \]

      8. add-sqr-sqrt 12.9%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 - z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{-y} \cdot \sqrt{-y}\right)} \]

      9. sqrt-unprod 56.9%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 - z \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(-y\right)}} \]

      10. sqr-neg 56.9%

          \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 - z \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot y}} \]

      11. sqrt-unprod 52.0%

          \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 - z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{y} \cdot \sqrt{y}\right)} \]

      12. add-sqr-sqrt 98.0%

          \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 - z \cdot \color{blue}{y} \]

   7. Applied egg-rr 98.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot 0.5 - z \cdot y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq 0.28:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(1 + \log z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 0.5 - y \cdot z\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* x 0.5) (* y (+ (- 1.0 z) (log z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * 0.5) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + log(z)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * 0.5d0) + (y * ((1.0d0 - z) + log(z)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * 0.5) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + Math.log(z)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * 0.5) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + math.log(z)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * 0.5) + Float64(y * Float64(Float64(1.0 - z) + log(z))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * 0.5) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + log(z)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * N[(N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision] + N[Log[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 59.6% accurate, 12.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq 3100000:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 0.5\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(-z\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z 3100000.0) (* x 0.5) (* y (- z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= 3100000.0) {
		tmp = x * 0.5;
	} else {
		tmp = y * -z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= 3100000.0d0) then
        tmp = x * 0.5d0
    else
        tmp = y * -z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= 3100000.0) {
		tmp = x * 0.5;
	} else {
		tmp = y * -z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= 3100000.0:
		tmp = x * 0.5
	else:
		tmp = y * -z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= 3100000.0)
		tmp = Float64(x * 0.5);
	else
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(-z));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= 3100000.0)
		tmp = x * 0.5;
	else
		tmp = y * -z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[z, 3100000.0], N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision], N[(y * (-z)), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < 3.1e6

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 50.5%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 50.5%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot y\right) \cdot z} \]

      2. neg-mul-1 50.5%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} \cdot z \]

   5. Simplified 50.5%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot z} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around inf 49.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot x} \]

   if 3.1e6 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 98.6%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 98.6%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot y\right) \cdot z} \]

      2. neg-mul-1 98.6%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} \cdot z \]

   5. Simplified 98.6%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot z} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around inf 86.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-1 \cdot z + 0.5 \cdot \frac{x}{y}\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 86.6%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(-z\right)} + 0.5 \cdot \frac{x}{y}\right) \]

      2. +-commutative 86.6%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \frac{x}{y} + \left(-z\right)\right)} \]

      3. unsub-neg 86.6%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \frac{x}{y} - z\right)} \]

      4. associate-*r/ 86.6%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{0.5 \cdot x}{y}} - z\right) \]

   8. Simplified 86.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(\frac{0.5 \cdot x}{y} - z\right)} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in y around inf 68.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

       1. neg-mul-1 68.9%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-y \cdot z} \]

       2. *-commutative 68.9%

          \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

       3. distribute-rgt-neg-in 68.9%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(-y\right)} \]

   11. Simplified 68.9%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(-y\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 59.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq 3100000:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 0.5\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(-z\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 74.0% accurate, 15.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot 0.5 - y \cdot z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- (* x 0.5) (* y z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * 0.5) - (y * z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * 0.5d0) - (y * z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * 0.5) - (y * z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * 0.5) - (y * z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * 0.5) - Float64(y * z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * 0.5) - (y * z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 75.5%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-*r* 75.5%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot y\right) \cdot z} \]

   2. neg-mul-1 75.5%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} \cdot z \]

5. Simplified 75.5%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot z} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. add-sqr-sqrt 37.0%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{-y} \cdot \sqrt{-y}\right)} \cdot z \]

   2. sqrt-unprod 51.4%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\sqrt{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(-y\right)}} \cdot z \]

   3. sqr-neg 51.4%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot y}} \cdot z \]

   4. sqrt-unprod 19.5%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{y} \cdot \sqrt{y}\right)} \cdot z \]

   5. add-sqr-sqrt 38.7%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{y} \cdot z \]

   6. cancel-sign-sub 38.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot 0.5 - \left(-y\right) \cdot z} \]

   7. *-commutative 38.7%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 - \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(-y\right)} \]

   8. add-sqr-sqrt 19.2%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 - z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{-y} \cdot \sqrt{-y}\right)} \]

   9. sqrt-unprod 52.8%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 - z \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(-y\right)}} \]

   10. sqr-neg 52.8%

       \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 - z \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot y}} \]

   11. sqrt-unprod 38.3%

       \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 - z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{y} \cdot \sqrt{y}\right)} \]

   12. add-sqr-sqrt 75.5%

       \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 - z \cdot \color{blue}{y} \]

7. Applied egg-rr 75.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot 0.5 - z \cdot y} \]

8. Final simplification 75.5%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 - y \cdot z \]
9. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 40.3% accurate, 37.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot 0.5 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* x 0.5))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x * 0.5;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x * 0.5d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x * 0.5;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x * 0.5

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x * 0.5)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x * 0.5;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 75.5%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-*r* 75.5%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot y\right) \cdot z} \]

   2. neg-mul-1 75.5%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} \cdot z \]

5. Simplified 75.5%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot z} \]

6. Taylor expanded in x around inf 39.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot x} \]

7. Final simplification 39.9%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 \]
8. Add Preprocessing

Developer Target 1: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(y + 0.5 \cdot x\right) - y \cdot \left(z - \log z\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- (+ y (* 0.5 x)) (* y (- z (log z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (y + (0.5 * x)) - (y * (z - log(z)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (y + (0.5d0 * x)) - (y * (z - log(z)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (y + (0.5 * x)) - (y * (z - Math.log(z)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (y + (0.5 * x)) - (y * (z - math.log(z)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(y + Float64(0.5 * x)) - Float64(y * Float64(z - log(z))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (y + (0.5 * x)) - (y * (z - log(z)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(y + N[(0.5 * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * N[(z - N[Log[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024137 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "System.Random.MWC.Distributions:gamma from mwc-random-0.13.3.2"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (! :herbie-platform default (- (+ y (* 1/2 x)) (* y (- z (log z)))))

  (+ (* x 0.5) (* y (+ (- 1.0 z) (log z)))))