Data.HashTable.ST.Basic:computeOverhead from hashtables-1.2.0.2

Percentage Accurate: 86.7% → 99.0%

Time: 14.6s

Alternatives: 18

Speedup: 0.8×

• 23.2% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (/ x y) (/ (+ 2.0 (* (* z 2.0) (- 1.0 t))) (* t z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x / y) + ((2.0 + ((z * 2.0) * (1.0 - t))) / (t * z));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (x / y) + ((2.0d0 + ((z * 2.0d0) * (1.0d0 - t))) / (t * z))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x / y) + ((2.0 + ((z * 2.0) * (1.0 - t))) / (t * z));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (x / y) + ((2.0 + ((z * 2.0) * (1.0 - t))) / (t * z))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(x / y) + Float64(Float64(2.0 + Float64(Float64(z * 2.0) * Float64(1.0 - t))) / Float64(t * z)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (x / y) + ((2.0 + ((z * 2.0) * (1.0 - t))) / (t * z));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(2.0 + N[(N[(z * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.0 - t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 86.7% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (/ x y) (/ (+ 2.0 (* (* z 2.0) (- 1.0 t))) (* t z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x / y) + ((2.0 + ((z * 2.0) * (1.0 - t))) / (t * z));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (x / y) + ((2.0d0 + ((z * 2.0d0) * (1.0d0 - t))) / (t * z))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x / y) + ((2.0 + ((z * 2.0) * (1.0 - t))) / (t * z));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (x / y) + ((2.0 + ((z * 2.0) * (1.0 - t))) / (t * z))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(x / y) + Float64(Float64(2.0 + Float64(Float64(z * 2.0) * Float64(1.0 - t))) / Float64(t * z)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (x / y) + ((2.0 + ((z * 2.0) * (1.0 - t))) / (t * z));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(2.0 + N[(N[(z * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.0 - t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.0% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \frac{x}{y} + -2\\ \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -14200000:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1 - \frac{\frac{-2}{t}}{z}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 8.4 \cdot 10^{-29}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\left(2 + \frac{2}{z}\right) + \frac{x \cdot t}{y}}{t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1 + \frac{\frac{2}{z}}{t}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ (/ x y) -2.0)))
   (if (<= t -14200000.0)
     (- t_1 (/ (/ -2.0 t) z))
     (if (<= t 8.4e-29)
       (/ (+ (+ 2.0 (/ 2.0 z)) (/ (* x t) y)) t)
       (+ t_1 (/ (/ 2.0 z) t))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = (x / y) + -2.0;
	double tmp;
	if (t <= -14200000.0) {
		tmp = t_1 - ((-2.0 / t) / z);
	} else if (t <= 8.4e-29) {
		tmp = ((2.0 + (2.0 / z)) + ((x * t) / y)) / t;
	} else {
		tmp = t_1 + ((2.0 / z) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = (x / y) + (-2.0d0)
    if (t <= (-14200000.0d0)) then
        tmp = t_1 - (((-2.0d0) / t) / z)
    else if (t <= 8.4d-29) then
        tmp = ((2.0d0 + (2.0d0 / z)) + ((x * t) / y)) / t
    else
        tmp = t_1 + ((2.0d0 / z) / t)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = (x / y) + -2.0;
	double tmp;
	if (t <= -14200000.0) {
		tmp = t_1 - ((-2.0 / t) / z);
	} else if (t <= 8.4e-29) {
		tmp = ((2.0 + (2.0 / z)) + ((x * t) / y)) / t;
	} else {
		tmp = t_1 + ((2.0 / z) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	t_1 = (x / y) + -2.0
	tmp = 0
	if t <= -14200000.0:
		tmp = t_1 - ((-2.0 / t) / z)
	elif t <= 8.4e-29:
		tmp = ((2.0 + (2.0 / z)) + ((x * t) / y)) / t
	else:
		tmp = t_1 + ((2.0 / z) / t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(x / y) + -2.0)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t <= -14200000.0)
		tmp = Float64(t_1 - Float64(Float64(-2.0 / t) / z));
	elseif (t <= 8.4e-29)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(2.0 + Float64(2.0 / z)) + Float64(Float64(x * t) / y)) / t);
	else
		tmp = Float64(t_1 + Float64(Float64(2.0 / z) / t));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = (x / y) + -2.0;
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t <= -14200000.0)
		tmp = t_1 - ((-2.0 / t) / z);
	elseif (t <= 8.4e-29)
		tmp = ((2.0 + (2.0 / z)) + ((x * t) / y)) / t;
	else
		tmp = t_1 + ((2.0 / z) / t);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision] + -2.0), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t, -14200000.0], N[(t$95$1 - N[(N[(-2.0 / t), $MachinePrecision] / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[t, 8.4e-29], N[(N[(N[(2.0 + N[(2.0 / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(x * t), $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision], N[(t$95$1 + N[(N[(2.0 / z), $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if t < -1.42e7

   1. Initial program 78.5%

      \[\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around 0 86.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2 + \left(2 \cdot \frac{1}{z} + t \cdot \left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right)\right)}{t}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+r+ 86.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(2 + 2 \cdot \frac{1}{z}\right) + t \cdot \left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right)}}{t} \]

      2. associate-*r/ 86.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\left(2 + \color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot 1}{z}}\right) + t \cdot \left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right)}{t} \]

      3. metadata-eval 86.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\left(2 + \frac{\color{blue}{2}}{z}\right) + t \cdot \left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right)}{t} \]

      4. sub-neg 86.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\left(2 + \frac{2}{z}\right) + t \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{x}{y} + \left(-2\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      5. metadata-eval 86.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\left(2 + \frac{2}{z}\right) + t \cdot \left(\frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{-2}\right)}{t} \]

   5. Simplified 86.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\left(2 + \frac{2}{z}\right) + t \cdot \left(\frac{x}{y} + -2\right)}{t}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around 0 86.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{2}{z}} + t \cdot \left(\frac{x}{y} + -2\right)}{t} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in z around inf 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot \frac{1}{t \cdot z} + \frac{x}{y}\right) - 2} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate--l+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \frac{1}{t \cdot z} + \left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right)} \]

      2. associate-*r/ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot 1}{t \cdot z}} + \left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right) \]

      3. metadata-eval 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{2}}{t \cdot z} + \left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right) \]

      4. associate-/l/ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{2}{z}}{t}} + \left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right) \]

      5. sub-neg 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{2}{z}}{t} + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{x}{y} + \left(-2\right)\right)} \]

      6. metadata-eval 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{2}{z}}{t} + \left(\frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{-2}\right) \]

   9. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{2}{z}}{t} + \left(\frac{x}{y} + -2\right)} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

       1. associate-/l/ 99.8%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2}{t \cdot z}} + \left(\frac{x}{y} + -2\right) \]

       2. associate-/r* 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{2}{t}}{z}} + \left(\frac{x}{y} + -2\right) \]

       3. frac-2neg 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{-\frac{2}{t}}{-z}} + \left(\frac{x}{y} + -2\right) \]

       4. distribute-frac-neg2 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{-\frac{2}{t}}{z}\right)} + \left(\frac{x}{y} + -2\right) \]

       5. distribute-neg-frac 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \left(-\frac{\color{blue}{\frac{-2}{t}}}{z}\right) + \left(\frac{x}{y} + -2\right) \]

       6. metadata-eval 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \left(-\frac{\frac{\color{blue}{-2}}{t}}{z}\right) + \left(\frac{x}{y} + -2\right) \]

   11. Applied egg-rr 100.0%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{\frac{-2}{t}}{z}\right)} + \left(\frac{x}{y} + -2\right) \]

   if -1.42e7 < t < 8.39999999999999958e-29

   1. Initial program 97.4%

      \[\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around 0 98.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2 + \left(2 \cdot \frac{1}{z} + t \cdot \left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right)\right)}{t}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+r+ 98.3%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(2 + 2 \cdot \frac{1}{z}\right) + t \cdot \left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right)}}{t} \]

      2. associate-*r/ 98.3%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\left(2 + \color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot 1}{z}}\right) + t \cdot \left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right)}{t} \]

      3. metadata-eval 98.3%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\left(2 + \frac{\color{blue}{2}}{z}\right) + t \cdot \left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right)}{t} \]

      4. sub-neg 98.3%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\left(2 + \frac{2}{z}\right) + t \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{x}{y} + \left(-2\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      5. metadata-eval 98.3%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\left(2 + \frac{2}{z}\right) + t \cdot \left(\frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{-2}\right)}{t} \]

   5. Simplified 98.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\left(2 + \frac{2}{z}\right) + t \cdot \left(\frac{x}{y} + -2\right)}{t}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around inf 99.3%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\left(2 + \frac{2}{z}\right) + \color{blue}{\frac{t \cdot x}{y}}}{t} \]

   if 8.39999999999999958e-29 < t

   1. Initial program 82.6%

      \[\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around 0 90.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2 + \left(2 \cdot \frac{1}{z} + t \cdot \left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right)\right)}{t}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+r+ 90.4%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(2 + 2 \cdot \frac{1}{z}\right) + t \cdot \left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right)}}{t} \]

      2. associate-*r/ 90.4%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\left(2 + \color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot 1}{z}}\right) + t \cdot \left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right)}{t} \]

      3. metadata-eval 90.4%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\left(2 + \frac{\color{blue}{2}}{z}\right) + t \cdot \left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right)}{t} \]

      4. sub-neg 90.4%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\left(2 + \frac{2}{z}\right) + t \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{x}{y} + \left(-2\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      5. metadata-eval 90.4%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\left(2 + \frac{2}{z}\right) + t \cdot \left(\frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{-2}\right)}{t} \]

   5. Simplified 90.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\left(2 + \frac{2}{z}\right) + t \cdot \left(\frac{x}{y} + -2\right)}{t}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around 0 90.4%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{2}{z}} + t \cdot \left(\frac{x}{y} + -2\right)}{t} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in z around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot \frac{1}{t \cdot z} + \frac{x}{y}\right) - 2} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate--l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \frac{1}{t \cdot z} + \left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right)} \]

      2. associate-*r/ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot 1}{t \cdot z}} + \left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right) \]

      3. metadata-eval 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{2}}{t \cdot z} + \left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right) \]

      4. associate-/l/ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{2}{z}}{t}} + \left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right) \]

      5. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{2}{z}}{t} + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{x}{y} + \left(-2\right)\right)} \]

      6. metadata-eval 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{2}{z}}{t} + \left(\frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{-2}\right) \]

   9. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{2}{z}}{t} + \left(\frac{x}{y} + -2\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -14200000:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(\frac{x}{y} + -2\right) - \frac{\frac{-2}{t}}{z}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 8.4 \cdot 10^{-29}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\left(2 + \frac{2}{z}\right) + \frac{x \cdot t}{y}}{t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(\frac{x}{y} + -2\right) + \frac{\frac{2}{z}}{t}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 99.2% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(1 - t\right) \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right)}{z \cdot t}\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_1 \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+305}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x + y \cdot \left(2 \cdot \frac{1 - t}{t} + 2 \cdot \frac{1}{z \cdot t}\right)}{y}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ (/ x y) (/ (+ 2.0 (* (- 1.0 t) (* 2.0 z))) (* z t)))))
   (if (<= t_1 2e+305)
     t_1
     (/ (+ x (* y (+ (* 2.0 (/ (- 1.0 t) t)) (* 2.0 (/ 1.0 (* z t)))))) y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = (x / y) + ((2.0 + ((1.0 - t) * (2.0 * z))) / (z * t));
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= 2e+305) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = (x + (y * ((2.0 * ((1.0 - t) / t)) + (2.0 * (1.0 / (z * t)))))) / y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = (x / y) + ((2.0d0 + ((1.0d0 - t) * (2.0d0 * z))) / (z * t))
    if (t_1 <= 2d+305) then
        tmp = t_1
    else
        tmp = (x + (y * ((2.0d0 * ((1.0d0 - t) / t)) + (2.0d0 * (1.0d0 / (z * t)))))) / y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = (x / y) + ((2.0 + ((1.0 - t) * (2.0 * z))) / (z * t));
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= 2e+305) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = (x + (y * ((2.0 * ((1.0 - t) / t)) + (2.0 * (1.0 / (z * t)))))) / y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	t_1 = (x / y) + ((2.0 + ((1.0 - t) * (2.0 * z))) / (z * t))
	tmp = 0
	if t_1 <= 2e+305:
		tmp = t_1
	else:
		tmp = (x + (y * ((2.0 * ((1.0 - t) / t)) + (2.0 * (1.0 / (z * t)))))) / y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(x / y) + Float64(Float64(2.0 + Float64(Float64(1.0 - t) * Float64(2.0 * z))) / Float64(z * t)))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_1 <= 2e+305)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(Float64(2.0 * Float64(Float64(1.0 - t) / t)) + Float64(2.0 * Float64(1.0 / Float64(z * t)))))) / y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = (x / y) + ((2.0 + ((1.0 - t) * (2.0 * z))) / (z * t));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t_1 <= 2e+305)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = (x + (y * ((2.0 * ((1.0 - t) / t)) + (2.0 * (1.0 / (z * t)))))) / y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(2.0 + N[(N[(1.0 - t), $MachinePrecision] * N[(2.0 * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$1, 2e+305], t$95$1, N[(N[(x + N[(y * N[(N[(2.0 * N[(N[(1.0 - t), $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(2.0 * N[(1.0 / N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (+.f64 (/.f64 x y) (/.f64 (+.f64 #s(literal 2 binary64) (*.f64 (*.f64 z #s(literal 2 binary64)) (-.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) t))) (*.f64 t z))) < 1.9999999999999999e305

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   if 1.9999999999999999e305 < (+.f64 (/.f64 x y) (/.f64 (+.f64 #s(literal 2 binary64) (*.f64 (*.f64 z #s(literal 2 binary64)) (-.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) t))) (*.f64 t z)))

   1. Initial program 49.1%

      \[\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 98.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x + y \cdot \left(2 \cdot \frac{1 - t}{t} + 2 \cdot \frac{1}{t \cdot z}\right)}{y}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(1 - t\right) \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right)}{z \cdot t} \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+305}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(1 - t\right) \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right)}{z \cdot t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x + y \cdot \left(2 \cdot \frac{1 - t}{t} + 2 \cdot \frac{1}{z \cdot t}\right)}{y}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 99.4% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(1 - t\right) \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right)}{z \cdot t}\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_1 \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x + y \cdot \left(-2 + \frac{2}{t}\right)}{y}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ (/ x y) (/ (+ 2.0 (* (- 1.0 t) (* 2.0 z))) (* z t)))))
   (if (<= t_1 INFINITY) t_1 (/ (+ x (* y (+ -2.0 (/ 2.0 t)))) y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = (x / y) + ((2.0 + ((1.0 - t) * (2.0 * z))) / (z * t));
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= ((double) INFINITY)) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = (x + (y * (-2.0 + (2.0 / t)))) / y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = (x / y) + ((2.0 + ((1.0 - t) * (2.0 * z))) / (z * t));
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= Double.POSITIVE_INFINITY) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = (x + (y * (-2.0 + (2.0 / t)))) / y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	t_1 = (x / y) + ((2.0 + ((1.0 - t) * (2.0 * z))) / (z * t))
	tmp = 0
	if t_1 <= math.inf:
		tmp = t_1
	else:
		tmp = (x + (y * (-2.0 + (2.0 / t)))) / y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(x / y) + Float64(Float64(2.0 + Float64(Float64(1.0 - t) * Float64(2.0 * z))) / Float64(z * t)))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_1 <= Inf)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(-2.0 + Float64(2.0 / t)))) / y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = (x / y) + ((2.0 + ((1.0 - t) * (2.0 * z))) / (z * t));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t_1 <= Inf)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = (x + (y * (-2.0 + (2.0 / t)))) / y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(2.0 + N[(N[(1.0 - t), $MachinePrecision] * N[(2.0 * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$1, Infinity], t$95$1, N[(N[(x + N[(y * N[(-2.0 + N[(2.0 / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (+.f64 (/.f64 x y) (/.f64 (+.f64 #s(literal 2 binary64) (*.f64 (*.f64 z #s(literal 2 binary64)) (-.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) t))) (*.f64 t z))) < +inf.0

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   if +inf.0 < (+.f64 (/.f64 x y) (/.f64 (+.f64 #s(literal 2 binary64) (*.f64 (*.f64 z #s(literal 2 binary64)) (-.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) t))) (*.f64 t z)))

   1. Initial program 0.0%

      \[\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 92.9%

      \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{2 \cdot \frac{1 - t}{t}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. div-sub 92.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{t} - \frac{t}{t}\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 92.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{t} + \left(-\frac{t}{t}\right)\right)} \]

      3. *-inverses 92.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + 2 \cdot \left(\frac{1}{t} + \left(-\color{blue}{1}\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 92.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + 2 \cdot \left(\frac{1}{t} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   5. Simplified 92.9%

      \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\frac{1}{t} + -1\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around 0 92.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x + 2 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(\frac{1}{t} - 1\right)\right)}{y}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 92.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(\frac{1}{t} - 1\right)\right) \cdot 2}}{y} \]

      2. sub-neg 92.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x + \left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{t} + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) \cdot 2}{y} \]

      3. metadata-eval 92.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x + \left(y \cdot \left(\frac{1}{t} + \color{blue}{-1}\right)\right) \cdot 2}{y} \]

      4. associate-*l* 92.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(\left(\frac{1}{t} + -1\right) \cdot 2\right)}}{y} \]

      5. *-commutative 92.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot \left(\frac{1}{t} + -1\right)\right)}}{y} \]

      6. distribute-lft-in 92.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot \frac{1}{t} + 2 \cdot -1\right)}}{y} \]

      7. metadata-eval 92.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x + y \cdot \left(2 \cdot \frac{1}{t} + \color{blue}{-2}\right)}{y} \]

      8. associate-*r/ 92.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x + y \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot 1}{t}} + -2\right)}{y} \]

      9. metadata-eval 92.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x + y \cdot \left(\frac{\color{blue}{2}}{t} + -2\right)}{y} \]

      10. +-commutative 92.9%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-2 + \frac{2}{t}\right)}}{y} \]

   8. Simplified 92.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x + y \cdot \left(-2 + \frac{2}{t}\right)}{y}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(1 - t\right) \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right)}{z \cdot t} \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(1 - t\right) \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right)}{z \cdot t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x + y \cdot \left(-2 + \frac{2}{t}\right)}{y}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 64.1% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \frac{x}{y} - 2\\ \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -1.5 \cdot 10^{+35}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq -6 \cdot 10^{-29}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\frac{2}{t}}{z}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq -9.8 \cdot 10^{-164}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2}{t}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 3.5 \cdot 10^{-64}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{2}{z \cdot t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (- (/ x y) 2.0)))
   (if (<= t -1.5e+35)
     t_1
     (if (<= t -6e-29)
       (/ (/ 2.0 t) z)
       (if (<= t -9.8e-164)
         (+ (/ x y) (/ 2.0 t))
         (if (<= t 3.5e-64) (/ 2.0 (* z t)) t_1))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = (x / y) - 2.0;
	double tmp;
	if (t <= -1.5e+35) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (t <= -6e-29) {
		tmp = (2.0 / t) / z;
	} else if (t <= -9.8e-164) {
		tmp = (x / y) + (2.0 / t);
	} else if (t <= 3.5e-64) {
		tmp = 2.0 / (z * t);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = (x / y) - 2.0d0
    if (t <= (-1.5d+35)) then
        tmp = t_1
    else if (t <= (-6d-29)) then
        tmp = (2.0d0 / t) / z
    else if (t <= (-9.8d-164)) then
        tmp = (x / y) + (2.0d0 / t)
    else if (t <= 3.5d-64) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 / (z * t)
    else
        tmp = t_1
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = (x / y) - 2.0;
	double tmp;
	if (t <= -1.5e+35) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (t <= -6e-29) {
		tmp = (2.0 / t) / z;
	} else if (t <= -9.8e-164) {
		tmp = (x / y) + (2.0 / t);
	} else if (t <= 3.5e-64) {
		tmp = 2.0 / (z * t);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	t_1 = (x / y) - 2.0
	tmp = 0
	if t <= -1.5e+35:
		tmp = t_1
	elif t <= -6e-29:
		tmp = (2.0 / t) / z
	elif t <= -9.8e-164:
		tmp = (x / y) + (2.0 / t)
	elif t <= 3.5e-64:
		tmp = 2.0 / (z * t)
	else:
		tmp = t_1
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(x / y) - 2.0)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t <= -1.5e+35)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (t <= -6e-29)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(2.0 / t) / z);
	elseif (t <= -9.8e-164)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x / y) + Float64(2.0 / t));
	elseif (t <= 3.5e-64)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 / Float64(z * t));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = (x / y) - 2.0;
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t <= -1.5e+35)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (t <= -6e-29)
		tmp = (2.0 / t) / z;
	elseif (t <= -9.8e-164)
		tmp = (x / y) + (2.0 / t);
	elseif (t <= 3.5e-64)
		tmp = 2.0 / (z * t);
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision] - 2.0), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t, -1.5e+35], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[t, -6e-29], N[(N[(2.0 / t), $MachinePrecision] / z), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[t, -9.8e-164], N[(N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(2.0 / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[t, 3.5e-64], N[(2.0 / N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 4 regimes

2. if t < -1.49999999999999995e35 or 3.5000000000000003e-64 < t

   1. Initial program 81.0%

      \[\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around inf 82.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{y} - 2} \]

   if -1.49999999999999995e35 < t < -6.0000000000000005e-29

   1. Initial program 99.3%

      \[\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 63.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2}{t \cdot z}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/r* 64.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{2}{t}}{z}} \]

      2. div-inv 63.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2}{t} \cdot \frac{1}{z}} \]

   5. Applied egg-rr 63.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2}{t} \cdot \frac{1}{z}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. un-div-inv 64.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{2}{t}}{z}} \]

   7. Applied egg-rr 64.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{2}{t}}{z}} \]

   if -6.0000000000000005e-29 < t < -9.7999999999999993e-164

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around 0 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{\frac{2 + 2 \cdot z}{t \cdot z}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 65.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \frac{1}{t} + \frac{x}{y}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 65.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{y} + 2 \cdot \frac{1}{t}} \]

      2. associate-*r/ 65.3%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot 1}{t}} \]

      3. metadata-eval 65.3%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{\color{blue}{2}}{t} \]

   6. Simplified 65.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2}{t}} \]

   if -9.7999999999999993e-164 < t < 3.5000000000000003e-64

   1. Initial program 95.8%

      \[\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 58.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2}{t \cdot z}} \]
3. Recombined 4 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 71.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -1.5 \cdot 10^{+35}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{y} - 2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq -6 \cdot 10^{-29}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\frac{2}{t}}{z}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq -9.8 \cdot 10^{-164}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2}{t}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 3.5 \cdot 10^{-64}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{2}{z \cdot t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{y} - 2\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 79.1% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{x}{y} \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+16} \lor \neg \left(\frac{x}{y} \leq 4 \cdot 10^{-19}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2}{z \cdot t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-2 + \frac{\frac{2}{z}}{t}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (/ x y) -1e+16) (not (<= (/ x y) 4e-19)))
   (+ (/ x y) (/ 2.0 (* z t)))
   (+ -2.0 (/ (/ 2.0 z) t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x / y) <= -1e+16) || !((x / y) <= 4e-19)) {
		tmp = (x / y) + (2.0 / (z * t));
	} else {
		tmp = -2.0 + ((2.0 / z) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((x / y) <= (-1d+16)) .or. (.not. ((x / y) <= 4d-19))) then
        tmp = (x / y) + (2.0d0 / (z * t))
    else
        tmp = (-2.0d0) + ((2.0d0 / z) / t)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x / y) <= -1e+16) || !((x / y) <= 4e-19)) {
		tmp = (x / y) + (2.0 / (z * t));
	} else {
		tmp = -2.0 + ((2.0 / z) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if ((x / y) <= -1e+16) or not ((x / y) <= 4e-19):
		tmp = (x / y) + (2.0 / (z * t))
	else:
		tmp = -2.0 + ((2.0 / z) / t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(x / y) <= -1e+16) || !(Float64(x / y) <= 4e-19))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x / y) + Float64(2.0 / Float64(z * t)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(-2.0 + Float64(Float64(2.0 / z) / t));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((x / y) <= -1e+16) || ~(((x / y) <= 4e-19)))
		tmp = (x / y) + (2.0 / (z * t));
	else
		tmp = -2.0 + ((2.0 / z) / t);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision], -1e+16], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision], 4e-19]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(2.0 / N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(-2.0 + N[(N[(2.0 / z), $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (/.f64 x y) < -1e16 or 3.9999999999999999e-19 < (/.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 90.3%

      \[\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 89.2%

      \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{\color{blue}{2}}{t \cdot z} \]

   if -1e16 < (/.f64 x y) < 3.9999999999999999e-19

   1. Initial program 87.6%

      \[\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around 0 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2 + \left(2 \cdot \frac{1}{z} + t \cdot \left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right)\right)}{t}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+r+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(2 + 2 \cdot \frac{1}{z}\right) + t \cdot \left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right)}}{t} \]

      2. associate-*r/ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\left(2 + \color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot 1}{z}}\right) + t \cdot \left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right)}{t} \]

      3. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\left(2 + \frac{\color{blue}{2}}{z}\right) + t \cdot \left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right)}{t} \]

      4. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\left(2 + \frac{2}{z}\right) + t \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{x}{y} + \left(-2\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      5. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\left(2 + \frac{2}{z}\right) + t \cdot \left(\frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{-2}\right)}{t} \]

   5. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\left(2 + \frac{2}{z}\right) + t \cdot \left(\frac{x}{y} + -2\right)}{t}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around 0 79.6%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{2}{z}} + t \cdot \left(\frac{x}{y} + -2\right)}{t} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in z around inf 79.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot \frac{1}{t \cdot z} + \frac{x}{y}\right) - 2} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate--l+ 79.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \frac{1}{t \cdot z} + \left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right)} \]

      2. associate-*r/ 79.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot 1}{t \cdot z}} + \left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right) \]

      3. metadata-eval 79.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{2}}{t \cdot z} + \left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right) \]

      4. associate-/l/ 79.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{2}{z}}{t}} + \left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right) \]

      5. sub-neg 79.6%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{2}{z}}{t} + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{x}{y} + \left(-2\right)\right)} \]

      6. metadata-eval 79.6%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{2}{z}}{t} + \left(\frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{-2}\right) \]

   9. Simplified 79.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{2}{z}}{t} + \left(\frac{x}{y} + -2\right)} \]

   10. Taylor expanded in x around 0 79.1%

       \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{2}{z}}{t} + \color{blue}{-2} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 84.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{x}{y} \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+16} \lor \neg \left(\frac{x}{y} \leq 4 \cdot 10^{-19}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2}{z \cdot t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-2 + \frac{\frac{2}{z}}{t}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 98.1% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \frac{x}{y} + -2\\ \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -14200000:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1 - \frac{\frac{-2}{t}}{z}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 8.4 \cdot 10^{-29}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + 2 \cdot z}{z \cdot t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1 + \frac{\frac{2}{z}}{t}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ (/ x y) -2.0)))
   (if (<= t -14200000.0)
     (- t_1 (/ (/ -2.0 t) z))
     (if (<= t 8.4e-29)
       (+ (/ x y) (/ (+ 2.0 (* 2.0 z)) (* z t)))
       (+ t_1 (/ (/ 2.0 z) t))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = (x / y) + -2.0;
	double tmp;
	if (t <= -14200000.0) {
		tmp = t_1 - ((-2.0 / t) / z);
	} else if (t <= 8.4e-29) {
		tmp = (x / y) + ((2.0 + (2.0 * z)) / (z * t));
	} else {
		tmp = t_1 + ((2.0 / z) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = (x / y) + (-2.0d0)
    if (t <= (-14200000.0d0)) then
        tmp = t_1 - (((-2.0d0) / t) / z)
    else if (t <= 8.4d-29) then
        tmp = (x / y) + ((2.0d0 + (2.0d0 * z)) / (z * t))
    else
        tmp = t_1 + ((2.0d0 / z) / t)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = (x / y) + -2.0;
	double tmp;
	if (t <= -14200000.0) {
		tmp = t_1 - ((-2.0 / t) / z);
	} else if (t <= 8.4e-29) {
		tmp = (x / y) + ((2.0 + (2.0 * z)) / (z * t));
	} else {
		tmp = t_1 + ((2.0 / z) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	t_1 = (x / y) + -2.0
	tmp = 0
	if t <= -14200000.0:
		tmp = t_1 - ((-2.0 / t) / z)
	elif t <= 8.4e-29:
		tmp = (x / y) + ((2.0 + (2.0 * z)) / (z * t))
	else:
		tmp = t_1 + ((2.0 / z) / t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(x / y) + -2.0)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t <= -14200000.0)
		tmp = Float64(t_1 - Float64(Float64(-2.0 / t) / z));
	elseif (t <= 8.4e-29)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x / y) + Float64(Float64(2.0 + Float64(2.0 * z)) / Float64(z * t)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(t_1 + Float64(Float64(2.0 / z) / t));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = (x / y) + -2.0;
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t <= -14200000.0)
		tmp = t_1 - ((-2.0 / t) / z);
	elseif (t <= 8.4e-29)
		tmp = (x / y) + ((2.0 + (2.0 * z)) / (z * t));
	else
		tmp = t_1 + ((2.0 / z) / t);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision] + -2.0), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t, -14200000.0], N[(t$95$1 - N[(N[(-2.0 / t), $MachinePrecision] / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[t, 8.4e-29], N[(N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(2.0 + N[(2.0 * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(t$95$1 + N[(N[(2.0 / z), $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if t < -1.42e7

   1. Initial program 78.5%

      \[\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around 0 86.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2 + \left(2 \cdot \frac{1}{z} + t \cdot \left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right)\right)}{t}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+r+ 86.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(2 + 2 \cdot \frac{1}{z}\right) + t \cdot \left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right)}}{t} \]

      2. associate-*r/ 86.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\left(2 + \color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot 1}{z}}\right) + t \cdot \left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right)}{t} \]

      3. metadata-eval 86.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\left(2 + \frac{\color{blue}{2}}{z}\right) + t \cdot \left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right)}{t} \]

      4. sub-neg 86.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\left(2 + \frac{2}{z}\right) + t \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{x}{y} + \left(-2\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      5. metadata-eval 86.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\left(2 + \frac{2}{z}\right) + t \cdot \left(\frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{-2}\right)}{t} \]

   5. Simplified 86.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\left(2 + \frac{2}{z}\right) + t \cdot \left(\frac{x}{y} + -2\right)}{t}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around 0 86.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{2}{z}} + t \cdot \left(\frac{x}{y} + -2\right)}{t} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in z around inf 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot \frac{1}{t \cdot z} + \frac{x}{y}\right) - 2} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate--l+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \frac{1}{t \cdot z} + \left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right)} \]

      2. associate-*r/ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot 1}{t \cdot z}} + \left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right) \]

      3. metadata-eval 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{2}}{t \cdot z} + \left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right) \]

      4. associate-/l/ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{2}{z}}{t}} + \left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right) \]

      5. sub-neg 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{2}{z}}{t} + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{x}{y} + \left(-2\right)\right)} \]

      6. metadata-eval 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{2}{z}}{t} + \left(\frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{-2}\right) \]

   9. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{2}{z}}{t} + \left(\frac{x}{y} + -2\right)} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

       1. associate-/l/ 99.8%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2}{t \cdot z}} + \left(\frac{x}{y} + -2\right) \]

       2. associate-/r* 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{2}{t}}{z}} + \left(\frac{x}{y} + -2\right) \]

       3. frac-2neg 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{-\frac{2}{t}}{-z}} + \left(\frac{x}{y} + -2\right) \]

       4. distribute-frac-neg2 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{-\frac{2}{t}}{z}\right)} + \left(\frac{x}{y} + -2\right) \]

       5. distribute-neg-frac 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \left(-\frac{\color{blue}{\frac{-2}{t}}}{z}\right) + \left(\frac{x}{y} + -2\right) \]

       6. metadata-eval 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \left(-\frac{\frac{\color{blue}{-2}}{t}}{z}\right) + \left(\frac{x}{y} + -2\right) \]

   11. Applied egg-rr 100.0%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{\frac{-2}{t}}{z}\right)} + \left(\frac{x}{y} + -2\right) \]

   if -1.42e7 < t < 8.39999999999999958e-29

   1. Initial program 97.4%

      \[\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around 0 96.9%

      \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{\frac{2 + 2 \cdot z}{t \cdot z}} \]

   if 8.39999999999999958e-29 < t

   1. Initial program 82.6%

      \[\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around 0 90.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2 + \left(2 \cdot \frac{1}{z} + t \cdot \left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right)\right)}{t}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+r+ 90.4%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(2 + 2 \cdot \frac{1}{z}\right) + t \cdot \left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right)}}{t} \]

      2. associate-*r/ 90.4%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\left(2 + \color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot 1}{z}}\right) + t \cdot \left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right)}{t} \]

      3. metadata-eval 90.4%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\left(2 + \frac{\color{blue}{2}}{z}\right) + t \cdot \left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right)}{t} \]

      4. sub-neg 90.4%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\left(2 + \frac{2}{z}\right) + t \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{x}{y} + \left(-2\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      5. metadata-eval 90.4%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\left(2 + \frac{2}{z}\right) + t \cdot \left(\frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{-2}\right)}{t} \]

   5. Simplified 90.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\left(2 + \frac{2}{z}\right) + t \cdot \left(\frac{x}{y} + -2\right)}{t}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around 0 90.4%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{2}{z}} + t \cdot \left(\frac{x}{y} + -2\right)}{t} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in z around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot \frac{1}{t \cdot z} + \frac{x}{y}\right) - 2} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate--l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \frac{1}{t \cdot z} + \left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right)} \]

      2. associate-*r/ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot 1}{t \cdot z}} + \left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right) \]

      3. metadata-eval 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{2}}{t \cdot z} + \left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right) \]

      4. associate-/l/ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{2}{z}}{t}} + \left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right) \]

      5. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{2}{z}}{t} + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{x}{y} + \left(-2\right)\right)} \]

      6. metadata-eval 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{2}{z}}{t} + \left(\frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{-2}\right) \]

   9. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{2}{z}}{t} + \left(\frac{x}{y} + -2\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -14200000:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(\frac{x}{y} + -2\right) - \frac{\frac{-2}{t}}{z}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 8.4 \cdot 10^{-29}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + 2 \cdot z}{z \cdot t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(\frac{x}{y} + -2\right) + \frac{\frac{2}{z}}{t}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 79.1% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{x}{y} \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+16}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2}{z \cdot t}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\frac{x}{y} \leq 4 \cdot 10^{-19}:\\ \;\;\;\;-2 + \frac{\frac{2}{z}}{t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{y} - \frac{\frac{-2}{z}}{t}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (/ x y) -1e+16)
   (+ (/ x y) (/ 2.0 (* z t)))
   (if (<= (/ x y) 4e-19)
     (+ -2.0 (/ (/ 2.0 z) t))
     (- (/ x y) (/ (/ -2.0 z) t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x / y) <= -1e+16) {
		tmp = (x / y) + (2.0 / (z * t));
	} else if ((x / y) <= 4e-19) {
		tmp = -2.0 + ((2.0 / z) / t);
	} else {
		tmp = (x / y) - ((-2.0 / z) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x / y) <= (-1d+16)) then
        tmp = (x / y) + (2.0d0 / (z * t))
    else if ((x / y) <= 4d-19) then
        tmp = (-2.0d0) + ((2.0d0 / z) / t)
    else
        tmp = (x / y) - (((-2.0d0) / z) / t)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x / y) <= -1e+16) {
		tmp = (x / y) + (2.0 / (z * t));
	} else if ((x / y) <= 4e-19) {
		tmp = -2.0 + ((2.0 / z) / t);
	} else {
		tmp = (x / y) - ((-2.0 / z) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (x / y) <= -1e+16:
		tmp = (x / y) + (2.0 / (z * t))
	elif (x / y) <= 4e-19:
		tmp = -2.0 + ((2.0 / z) / t)
	else:
		tmp = (x / y) - ((-2.0 / z) / t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(x / y) <= -1e+16)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x / y) + Float64(2.0 / Float64(z * t)));
	elseif (Float64(x / y) <= 4e-19)
		tmp = Float64(-2.0 + Float64(Float64(2.0 / z) / t));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x / y) - Float64(Float64(-2.0 / z) / t));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x / y) <= -1e+16)
		tmp = (x / y) + (2.0 / (z * t));
	elseif ((x / y) <= 4e-19)
		tmp = -2.0 + ((2.0 / z) / t);
	else
		tmp = (x / y) - ((-2.0 / z) / t);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision], -1e+16], N[(N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(2.0 / N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision], 4e-19], N[(-2.0 + N[(N[(2.0 / z), $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(-2.0 / z), $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (/.f64 x y) < -1e16

   1. Initial program 92.8%

      \[\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 91.9%

      \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{\color{blue}{2}}{t \cdot z} \]

   if -1e16 < (/.f64 x y) < 3.9999999999999999e-19

   1. Initial program 87.6%

      \[\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around 0 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2 + \left(2 \cdot \frac{1}{z} + t \cdot \left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right)\right)}{t}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+r+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(2 + 2 \cdot \frac{1}{z}\right) + t \cdot \left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right)}}{t} \]

      2. associate-*r/ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\left(2 + \color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot 1}{z}}\right) + t \cdot \left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right)}{t} \]

      3. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\left(2 + \frac{\color{blue}{2}}{z}\right) + t \cdot \left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right)}{t} \]

      4. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\left(2 + \frac{2}{z}\right) + t \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{x}{y} + \left(-2\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      5. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\left(2 + \frac{2}{z}\right) + t \cdot \left(\frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{-2}\right)}{t} \]

   5. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\left(2 + \frac{2}{z}\right) + t \cdot \left(\frac{x}{y} + -2\right)}{t}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around 0 79.6%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{2}{z}} + t \cdot \left(\frac{x}{y} + -2\right)}{t} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in z around inf 79.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot \frac{1}{t \cdot z} + \frac{x}{y}\right) - 2} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate--l+ 79.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \frac{1}{t \cdot z} + \left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right)} \]

      2. associate-*r/ 79.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot 1}{t \cdot z}} + \left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right) \]

      3. metadata-eval 79.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{2}}{t \cdot z} + \left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right) \]

      4. associate-/l/ 79.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{2}{z}}{t}} + \left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right) \]

      5. sub-neg 79.6%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{2}{z}}{t} + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{x}{y} + \left(-2\right)\right)} \]

      6. metadata-eval 79.6%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{2}{z}}{t} + \left(\frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{-2}\right) \]

   9. Simplified 79.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{2}{z}}{t} + \left(\frac{x}{y} + -2\right)} \]

   10. Taylor expanded in x around 0 79.1%

       \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{2}{z}}{t} + \color{blue}{-2} \]

   if 3.9999999999999999e-19 < (/.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 88.2%

      \[\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 87.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{\color{blue}{2}}{t \cdot z} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 87.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \frac{1}{t \cdot z} + \frac{x}{y}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 87.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot 1}{t \cdot z}} + \frac{x}{y} \]

      2. metadata-eval 87.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{2}}{t \cdot z} + \frac{x}{y} \]

      3. associate-/l/ 87.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{2}{z}}{t}} + \frac{x}{y} \]

      4. +-commutative 87.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{y} + \frac{\frac{2}{z}}{t}} \]

      5. associate-/r* 87.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{\frac{2}{z \cdot t}} \]

      6. metadata-eval 87.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{\color{blue}{--2}}{z \cdot t} \]

      7. distribute-neg-frac 87.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{-2}{z \cdot t}\right)} \]

      8. unsub-neg 87.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{y} - \frac{-2}{z \cdot t}} \]

      9. associate-/r* 87.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{-2}{z}}{t}} \]

   6. Simplified 87.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{y} - \frac{\frac{-2}{z}}{t}} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 84.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{x}{y} \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+16}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2}{z \cdot t}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\frac{x}{y} \leq 4 \cdot 10^{-19}:\\ \;\;\;\;-2 + \frac{\frac{2}{z}}{t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{y} - \frac{\frac{-2}{z}}{t}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 96.7% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.55 \cdot 10^{+57} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 0.52\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{y} + 2 \cdot \left(\frac{1}{t} + -1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(\frac{x}{y} + -2\right) - \frac{\frac{-2}{t}}{z}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -1.55e+57) (not (<= z 0.52)))
   (+ (/ x y) (* 2.0 (+ (/ 1.0 t) -1.0)))
   (- (+ (/ x y) -2.0) (/ (/ -2.0 t) z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1.55e+57) || !(z <= 0.52)) {
		tmp = (x / y) + (2.0 * ((1.0 / t) + -1.0));
	} else {
		tmp = ((x / y) + -2.0) - ((-2.0 / t) / z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-1.55d+57)) .or. (.not. (z <= 0.52d0))) then
        tmp = (x / y) + (2.0d0 * ((1.0d0 / t) + (-1.0d0)))
    else
        tmp = ((x / y) + (-2.0d0)) - (((-2.0d0) / t) / z)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1.55e+57) || !(z <= 0.52)) {
		tmp = (x / y) + (2.0 * ((1.0 / t) + -1.0));
	} else {
		tmp = ((x / y) + -2.0) - ((-2.0 / t) / z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -1.55e+57) or not (z <= 0.52):
		tmp = (x / y) + (2.0 * ((1.0 / t) + -1.0))
	else:
		tmp = ((x / y) + -2.0) - ((-2.0 / t) / z)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -1.55e+57) || !(z <= 0.52))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x / y) + Float64(2.0 * Float64(Float64(1.0 / t) + -1.0)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(x / y) + -2.0) - Float64(Float64(-2.0 / t) / z));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -1.55e+57) || ~((z <= 0.52)))
		tmp = (x / y) + (2.0 * ((1.0 / t) + -1.0));
	else
		tmp = ((x / y) + -2.0) - ((-2.0 / t) / z);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -1.55e+57], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 0.52]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(2.0 * N[(N[(1.0 / t), $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision] + -2.0), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(-2.0 / t), $MachinePrecision] / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -1.55000000000000007e57 or 0.52000000000000002 < z

   1. Initial program 76.8%

      \[\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{2 \cdot \frac{1 - t}{t}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. div-sub 99.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{t} - \frac{t}{t}\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 99.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{t} + \left(-\frac{t}{t}\right)\right)} \]

      3. *-inverses 99.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + 2 \cdot \left(\frac{1}{t} + \left(-\color{blue}{1}\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + 2 \cdot \left(\frac{1}{t} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   5. Simplified 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\frac{1}{t} + -1\right)} \]

   if -1.55000000000000007e57 < z < 0.52000000000000002

   1. Initial program 97.2%

      \[\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around 0 91.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2 + \left(2 \cdot \frac{1}{z} + t \cdot \left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right)\right)}{t}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+r+ 91.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(2 + 2 \cdot \frac{1}{z}\right) + t \cdot \left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right)}}{t} \]

      2. associate-*r/ 91.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\left(2 + \color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot 1}{z}}\right) + t \cdot \left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right)}{t} \]

      3. metadata-eval 91.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\left(2 + \frac{\color{blue}{2}}{z}\right) + t \cdot \left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right)}{t} \]

      4. sub-neg 91.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\left(2 + \frac{2}{z}\right) + t \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{x}{y} + \left(-2\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      5. metadata-eval 91.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\left(2 + \frac{2}{z}\right) + t \cdot \left(\frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{-2}\right)}{t} \]

   5. Simplified 91.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\left(2 + \frac{2}{z}\right) + t \cdot \left(\frac{x}{y} + -2\right)}{t}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around 0 90.6%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{2}{z}} + t \cdot \left(\frac{x}{y} + -2\right)}{t} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in z around inf 96.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot \frac{1}{t \cdot z} + \frac{x}{y}\right) - 2} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate--l+ 96.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \frac{1}{t \cdot z} + \left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right)} \]

      2. associate-*r/ 96.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot 1}{t \cdot z}} + \left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right) \]

      3. metadata-eval 96.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{2}}{t \cdot z} + \left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right) \]

      4. associate-/l/ 96.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{2}{z}}{t}} + \left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right) \]

      5. sub-neg 96.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{2}{z}}{t} + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{x}{y} + \left(-2\right)\right)} \]

      6. metadata-eval 96.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{2}{z}}{t} + \left(\frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{-2}\right) \]

   9. Simplified 96.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{2}{z}}{t} + \left(\frac{x}{y} + -2\right)} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

       1. associate-/l/ 96.7%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2}{t \cdot z}} + \left(\frac{x}{y} + -2\right) \]

       2. associate-/r* 96.7%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{2}{t}}{z}} + \left(\frac{x}{y} + -2\right) \]

       3. frac-2neg 96.7%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{-\frac{2}{t}}{-z}} + \left(\frac{x}{y} + -2\right) \]

       4. distribute-frac-neg2 96.7%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{-\frac{2}{t}}{z}\right)} + \left(\frac{x}{y} + -2\right) \]

       5. distribute-neg-frac 96.7%

          \[\leadsto \left(-\frac{\color{blue}{\frac{-2}{t}}}{z}\right) + \left(\frac{x}{y} + -2\right) \]

       6. metadata-eval 96.7%

          \[\leadsto \left(-\frac{\frac{\color{blue}{-2}}{t}}{z}\right) + \left(\frac{x}{y} + -2\right) \]

   11. Applied egg-rr 96.7%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{\frac{-2}{t}}{z}\right)} + \left(\frac{x}{y} + -2\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 97.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.55 \cdot 10^{+57} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 0.52\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{y} + 2 \cdot \left(\frac{1}{t} + -1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(\frac{x}{y} + -2\right) - \frac{\frac{-2}{t}}{z}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 96.7% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.55 \cdot 10^{+57} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 0.52\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{y} + 2 \cdot \left(\frac{1}{t} + -1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(\frac{x}{y} + -2\right) + \frac{\frac{2}{z}}{t}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -1.55e+57) (not (<= z 0.52)))
   (+ (/ x y) (* 2.0 (+ (/ 1.0 t) -1.0)))
   (+ (+ (/ x y) -2.0) (/ (/ 2.0 z) t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1.55e+57) || !(z <= 0.52)) {
		tmp = (x / y) + (2.0 * ((1.0 / t) + -1.0));
	} else {
		tmp = ((x / y) + -2.0) + ((2.0 / z) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-1.55d+57)) .or. (.not. (z <= 0.52d0))) then
        tmp = (x / y) + (2.0d0 * ((1.0d0 / t) + (-1.0d0)))
    else
        tmp = ((x / y) + (-2.0d0)) + ((2.0d0 / z) / t)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1.55e+57) || !(z <= 0.52)) {
		tmp = (x / y) + (2.0 * ((1.0 / t) + -1.0));
	} else {
		tmp = ((x / y) + -2.0) + ((2.0 / z) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -1.55e+57) or not (z <= 0.52):
		tmp = (x / y) + (2.0 * ((1.0 / t) + -1.0))
	else:
		tmp = ((x / y) + -2.0) + ((2.0 / z) / t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -1.55e+57) || !(z <= 0.52))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x / y) + Float64(2.0 * Float64(Float64(1.0 / t) + -1.0)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(x / y) + -2.0) + Float64(Float64(2.0 / z) / t));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -1.55e+57) || ~((z <= 0.52)))
		tmp = (x / y) + (2.0 * ((1.0 / t) + -1.0));
	else
		tmp = ((x / y) + -2.0) + ((2.0 / z) / t);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -1.55e+57], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 0.52]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(2.0 * N[(N[(1.0 / t), $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision] + -2.0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(2.0 / z), $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -1.55000000000000007e57 or 0.52000000000000002 < z

   1. Initial program 76.8%

      \[\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{2 \cdot \frac{1 - t}{t}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. div-sub 99.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{t} - \frac{t}{t}\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 99.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{t} + \left(-\frac{t}{t}\right)\right)} \]

      3. *-inverses 99.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + 2 \cdot \left(\frac{1}{t} + \left(-\color{blue}{1}\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + 2 \cdot \left(\frac{1}{t} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   5. Simplified 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\frac{1}{t} + -1\right)} \]

   if -1.55000000000000007e57 < z < 0.52000000000000002

   1. Initial program 97.2%

      \[\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around 0 91.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2 + \left(2 \cdot \frac{1}{z} + t \cdot \left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right)\right)}{t}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+r+ 91.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(2 + 2 \cdot \frac{1}{z}\right) + t \cdot \left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right)}}{t} \]

      2. associate-*r/ 91.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\left(2 + \color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot 1}{z}}\right) + t \cdot \left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right)}{t} \]

      3. metadata-eval 91.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\left(2 + \frac{\color{blue}{2}}{z}\right) + t \cdot \left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right)}{t} \]

      4. sub-neg 91.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\left(2 + \frac{2}{z}\right) + t \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{x}{y} + \left(-2\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      5. metadata-eval 91.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\left(2 + \frac{2}{z}\right) + t \cdot \left(\frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{-2}\right)}{t} \]

   5. Simplified 91.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\left(2 + \frac{2}{z}\right) + t \cdot \left(\frac{x}{y} + -2\right)}{t}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around 0 90.6%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{2}{z}} + t \cdot \left(\frac{x}{y} + -2\right)}{t} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in z around inf 96.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot \frac{1}{t \cdot z} + \frac{x}{y}\right) - 2} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate--l+ 96.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \frac{1}{t \cdot z} + \left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right)} \]

      2. associate-*r/ 96.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot 1}{t \cdot z}} + \left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right) \]

      3. metadata-eval 96.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{2}}{t \cdot z} + \left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right) \]

      4. associate-/l/ 96.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{2}{z}}{t}} + \left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right) \]

      5. sub-neg 96.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{2}{z}}{t} + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{x}{y} + \left(-2\right)\right)} \]

      6. metadata-eval 96.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{2}{z}}{t} + \left(\frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{-2}\right) \]

   9. Simplified 96.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{2}{z}}{t} + \left(\frac{x}{y} + -2\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 97.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.55 \cdot 10^{+57} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 0.52\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{y} + 2 \cdot \left(\frac{1}{t} + -1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(\frac{x}{y} + -2\right) + \frac{\frac{2}{z}}{t}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 92.0% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -4.1 \cdot 10^{-9} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 0.00076\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{y} + 2 \cdot \left(\frac{1}{t} + -1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{y} - \frac{\frac{-2}{z}}{t}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -4.1e-9) (not (<= z 0.00076)))
   (+ (/ x y) (* 2.0 (+ (/ 1.0 t) -1.0)))
   (- (/ x y) (/ (/ -2.0 z) t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -4.1e-9) || !(z <= 0.00076)) {
		tmp = (x / y) + (2.0 * ((1.0 / t) + -1.0));
	} else {
		tmp = (x / y) - ((-2.0 / z) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-4.1d-9)) .or. (.not. (z <= 0.00076d0))) then
        tmp = (x / y) + (2.0d0 * ((1.0d0 / t) + (-1.0d0)))
    else
        tmp = (x / y) - (((-2.0d0) / z) / t)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -4.1e-9) || !(z <= 0.00076)) {
		tmp = (x / y) + (2.0 * ((1.0 / t) + -1.0));
	} else {
		tmp = (x / y) - ((-2.0 / z) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -4.1e-9) or not (z <= 0.00076):
		tmp = (x / y) + (2.0 * ((1.0 / t) + -1.0))
	else:
		tmp = (x / y) - ((-2.0 / z) / t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -4.1e-9) || !(z <= 0.00076))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x / y) + Float64(2.0 * Float64(Float64(1.0 / t) + -1.0)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x / y) - Float64(Float64(-2.0 / z) / t));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -4.1e-9) || ~((z <= 0.00076)))
		tmp = (x / y) + (2.0 * ((1.0 / t) + -1.0));
	else
		tmp = (x / y) - ((-2.0 / z) / t);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -4.1e-9], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 0.00076]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(2.0 * N[(N[(1.0 / t), $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(-2.0 / z), $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -4.1000000000000003e-9 or 7.6000000000000004e-4 < z

   1. Initial program 77.6%

      \[\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 98.4%

      \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{2 \cdot \frac{1 - t}{t}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. div-sub 98.4%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{t} - \frac{t}{t}\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 98.4%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{t} + \left(-\frac{t}{t}\right)\right)} \]

      3. *-inverses 98.4%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + 2 \cdot \left(\frac{1}{t} + \left(-\color{blue}{1}\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 98.4%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + 2 \cdot \left(\frac{1}{t} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   5. Simplified 98.4%

      \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\frac{1}{t} + -1\right)} \]

   if -4.1000000000000003e-9 < z < 7.6000000000000004e-4

   1. Initial program 97.7%

      \[\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 83.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{\color{blue}{2}}{t \cdot z} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 83.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \frac{1}{t \cdot z} + \frac{x}{y}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 83.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot 1}{t \cdot z}} + \frac{x}{y} \]

      2. metadata-eval 83.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{2}}{t \cdot z} + \frac{x}{y} \]

      3. associate-/l/ 83.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{2}{z}}{t}} + \frac{x}{y} \]

      4. +-commutative 83.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{y} + \frac{\frac{2}{z}}{t}} \]

      5. associate-/r* 83.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{\frac{2}{z \cdot t}} \]

      6. metadata-eval 83.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{\color{blue}{--2}}{z \cdot t} \]

      7. distribute-neg-frac 83.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{-2}{z \cdot t}\right)} \]

      8. unsub-neg 83.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{y} - \frac{-2}{z \cdot t}} \]

      9. associate-/r* 83.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{-2}{z}}{t}} \]

   6. Simplified 83.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{y} - \frac{\frac{-2}{z}}{t}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 89.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -4.1 \cdot 10^{-9} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 0.00076\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{y} + 2 \cdot \left(\frac{1}{t} + -1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{y} - \frac{\frac{-2}{z}}{t}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 72.5% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{x}{y} \leq -1.5 \cdot 10^{+147} \lor \neg \left(\frac{x}{y} \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+25}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2}{t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-2 + \frac{\frac{2}{z}}{t}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (/ x y) -1.5e+147) (not (<= (/ x y) 2e+25)))
   (+ (/ x y) (/ 2.0 t))
   (+ -2.0 (/ (/ 2.0 z) t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x / y) <= -1.5e+147) || !((x / y) <= 2e+25)) {
		tmp = (x / y) + (2.0 / t);
	} else {
		tmp = -2.0 + ((2.0 / z) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((x / y) <= (-1.5d+147)) .or. (.not. ((x / y) <= 2d+25))) then
        tmp = (x / y) + (2.0d0 / t)
    else
        tmp = (-2.0d0) + ((2.0d0 / z) / t)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x / y) <= -1.5e+147) || !((x / y) <= 2e+25)) {
		tmp = (x / y) + (2.0 / t);
	} else {
		tmp = -2.0 + ((2.0 / z) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if ((x / y) <= -1.5e+147) or not ((x / y) <= 2e+25):
		tmp = (x / y) + (2.0 / t)
	else:
		tmp = -2.0 + ((2.0 / z) / t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(x / y) <= -1.5e+147) || !(Float64(x / y) <= 2e+25))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x / y) + Float64(2.0 / t));
	else
		tmp = Float64(-2.0 + Float64(Float64(2.0 / z) / t));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((x / y) <= -1.5e+147) || ~(((x / y) <= 2e+25)))
		tmp = (x / y) + (2.0 / t);
	else
		tmp = -2.0 + ((2.0 / z) / t);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision], -1.5e+147], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision], 2e+25]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(2.0 / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(-2.0 + N[(N[(2.0 / z), $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (/.f64 x y) < -1.49999999999999997e147 or 2.00000000000000018e25 < (/.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 89.8%

      \[\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around 0 96.8%

      \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{\frac{2 + 2 \cdot z}{t \cdot z}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 79.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \frac{1}{t} + \frac{x}{y}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 79.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{y} + 2 \cdot \frac{1}{t}} \]

      2. associate-*r/ 79.4%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot 1}{t}} \]

      3. metadata-eval 79.4%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{\color{blue}{2}}{t} \]

   6. Simplified 79.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2}{t}} \]

   if -1.49999999999999997e147 < (/.f64 x y) < 2.00000000000000018e25

   1. Initial program 88.3%

      \[\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around 0 98.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2 + \left(2 \cdot \frac{1}{z} + t \cdot \left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right)\right)}{t}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+r+ 98.6%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(2 + 2 \cdot \frac{1}{z}\right) + t \cdot \left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right)}}{t} \]

      2. associate-*r/ 98.6%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\left(2 + \color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot 1}{z}}\right) + t \cdot \left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right)}{t} \]

      3. metadata-eval 98.6%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\left(2 + \frac{\color{blue}{2}}{z}\right) + t \cdot \left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right)}{t} \]

      4. sub-neg 98.6%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\left(2 + \frac{2}{z}\right) + t \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{x}{y} + \left(-2\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      5. metadata-eval 98.6%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\left(2 + \frac{2}{z}\right) + t \cdot \left(\frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{-2}\right)}{t} \]

   5. Simplified 98.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\left(2 + \frac{2}{z}\right) + t \cdot \left(\frac{x}{y} + -2\right)}{t}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around 0 79.8%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{2}{z}} + t \cdot \left(\frac{x}{y} + -2\right)}{t} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in z around inf 81.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot \frac{1}{t \cdot z} + \frac{x}{y}\right) - 2} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate--l+ 81.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \frac{1}{t \cdot z} + \left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right)} \]

      2. associate-*r/ 81.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot 1}{t \cdot z}} + \left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right) \]

      3. metadata-eval 81.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{2}}{t \cdot z} + \left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right) \]

      4. associate-/l/ 81.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{2}{z}}{t}} + \left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right) \]

      5. sub-neg 81.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{2}{z}}{t} + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{x}{y} + \left(-2\right)\right)} \]

      6. metadata-eval 81.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{2}{z}}{t} + \left(\frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{-2}\right) \]

   9. Simplified 81.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{2}{z}}{t} + \left(\frac{x}{y} + -2\right)} \]

   10. Taylor expanded in x around 0 75.5%

       \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{2}{z}}{t} + \color{blue}{-2} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 77.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{x}{y} \leq -1.5 \cdot 10^{+147} \lor \neg \left(\frac{x}{y} \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+25}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2}{t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-2 + \frac{\frac{2}{z}}{t}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 12: 64.4% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{x}{y} \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+71} \lor \neg \left(\frac{x}{y} \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+25}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-2 + \frac{2}{t}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (/ x y) -2e+71) (not (<= (/ x y) 2e+25)))
   (/ x y)
   (+ -2.0 (/ 2.0 t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x / y) <= -2e+71) || !((x / y) <= 2e+25)) {
		tmp = x / y;
	} else {
		tmp = -2.0 + (2.0 / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((x / y) <= (-2d+71)) .or. (.not. ((x / y) <= 2d+25))) then
        tmp = x / y
    else
        tmp = (-2.0d0) + (2.0d0 / t)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x / y) <= -2e+71) || !((x / y) <= 2e+25)) {
		tmp = x / y;
	} else {
		tmp = -2.0 + (2.0 / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if ((x / y) <= -2e+71) or not ((x / y) <= 2e+25):
		tmp = x / y
	else:
		tmp = -2.0 + (2.0 / t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(x / y) <= -2e+71) || !(Float64(x / y) <= 2e+25))
		tmp = Float64(x / y);
	else
		tmp = Float64(-2.0 + Float64(2.0 / t));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((x / y) <= -2e+71) || ~(((x / y) <= 2e+25)))
		tmp = x / y;
	else
		tmp = -2.0 + (2.0 / t);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision], -2e+71], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision], 2e+25]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision], N[(-2.0 + N[(2.0 / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (/.f64 x y) < -2.0000000000000001e71 or 2.00000000000000018e25 < (/.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 90.4%

      \[\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 67.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{y}} \]

   if -2.0000000000000001e71 < (/.f64 x y) < 2.00000000000000018e25

   1. Initial program 87.6%

      \[\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 59.4%

      \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{2 \cdot \frac{1 - t}{t}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. div-sub 59.4%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{t} - \frac{t}{t}\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 59.4%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{t} + \left(-\frac{t}{t}\right)\right)} \]

      3. *-inverses 59.4%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + 2 \cdot \left(\frac{1}{t} + \left(-\color{blue}{1}\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 59.4%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + 2 \cdot \left(\frac{1}{t} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   5. Simplified 59.4%

      \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\frac{1}{t} + -1\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around 0 57.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\frac{1}{t} - 1\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 57.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{t} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      2. metadata-eval 57.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\frac{1}{t} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 57.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 + \frac{1}{t}\right)} \]

      4. distribute-lft-in 57.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot -1 + 2 \cdot \frac{1}{t}} \]

      5. metadata-eval 57.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-2} + 2 \cdot \frac{1}{t} \]

      6. associate-*r/ 57.5%

         \[\leadsto -2 + \color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot 1}{t}} \]

      7. metadata-eval 57.5%

         \[\leadsto -2 + \frac{\color{blue}{2}}{t} \]

   8. Simplified 57.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-2 + \frac{2}{t}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 62.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{x}{y} \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+71} \lor \neg \left(\frac{x}{y} \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+25}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-2 + \frac{2}{t}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 13: 78.7% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -5.2 \cdot 10^{+32} \lor \neg \left(t \leq 3.5 \cdot 10^{-64}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{y} - 2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{2 + \frac{2}{z}}{t}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= t -5.2e+32) (not (<= t 3.5e-64)))
   (- (/ x y) 2.0)
   (/ (+ 2.0 (/ 2.0 z)) t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((t <= -5.2e+32) || !(t <= 3.5e-64)) {
		tmp = (x / y) - 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = (2.0 + (2.0 / z)) / t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((t <= (-5.2d+32)) .or. (.not. (t <= 3.5d-64))) then
        tmp = (x / y) - 2.0d0
    else
        tmp = (2.0d0 + (2.0d0 / z)) / t
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((t <= -5.2e+32) || !(t <= 3.5e-64)) {
		tmp = (x / y) - 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = (2.0 + (2.0 / z)) / t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (t <= -5.2e+32) or not (t <= 3.5e-64):
		tmp = (x / y) - 2.0
	else:
		tmp = (2.0 + (2.0 / z)) / t
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((t <= -5.2e+32) || !(t <= 3.5e-64))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x / y) - 2.0);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(2.0 + Float64(2.0 / z)) / t);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((t <= -5.2e+32) || ~((t <= 3.5e-64)))
		tmp = (x / y) - 2.0;
	else
		tmp = (2.0 + (2.0 / z)) / t;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[t, -5.2e+32], N[Not[LessEqual[t, 3.5e-64]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision] - 2.0), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(2.0 + N[(2.0 / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if t < -5.2000000000000004e32 or 3.5000000000000003e-64 < t

   1. Initial program 81.0%

      \[\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around inf 82.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{y} - 2} \]

   if -5.2000000000000004e32 < t < 3.5000000000000003e-64

   1. Initial program 97.3%

      \[\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around 0 78.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2 + 2 \cdot \frac{1}{z}}{t}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 78.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{2 + \color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot 1}{z}}}{t} \]

      2. metadata-eval 78.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{2 + \frac{\color{blue}{2}}{z}}{t} \]

   5. Simplified 78.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2 + \frac{2}{z}}{t}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 80.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -5.2 \cdot 10^{+32} \lor \neg \left(t \leq 3.5 \cdot 10^{-64}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{y} - 2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{2 + \frac{2}{z}}{t}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 14: 51.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{x}{y} \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+16} \lor \neg \left(\frac{x}{y} \leq 4 \cdot 10^{-19}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (/ x y) -1e+16) (not (<= (/ x y) 4e-19))) (/ x y) -2.0))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x / y) <= -1e+16) || !((x / y) <= 4e-19)) {
		tmp = x / y;
	} else {
		tmp = -2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((x / y) <= (-1d+16)) .or. (.not. ((x / y) <= 4d-19))) then
        tmp = x / y
    else
        tmp = -2.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x / y) <= -1e+16) || !((x / y) <= 4e-19)) {
		tmp = x / y;
	} else {
		tmp = -2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if ((x / y) <= -1e+16) or not ((x / y) <= 4e-19):
		tmp = x / y
	else:
		tmp = -2.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(x / y) <= -1e+16) || !(Float64(x / y) <= 4e-19))
		tmp = Float64(x / y);
	else
		tmp = -2.0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((x / y) <= -1e+16) || ~(((x / y) <= 4e-19)))
		tmp = x / y;
	else
		tmp = -2.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision], -1e+16], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision], 4e-19]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision], -2.0]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (/.f64 x y) < -1e16 or 3.9999999999999999e-19 < (/.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 90.3%

      \[\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 63.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{y}} \]

   if -1e16 < (/.f64 x y) < 3.9999999999999999e-19

   1. Initial program 87.6%

      \[\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around 0 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2 + \left(2 \cdot \frac{1}{z} + t \cdot \left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right)\right)}{t}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+r+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(2 + 2 \cdot \frac{1}{z}\right) + t \cdot \left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right)}}{t} \]

      2. associate-*r/ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\left(2 + \color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot 1}{z}}\right) + t \cdot \left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right)}{t} \]

      3. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\left(2 + \frac{\color{blue}{2}}{z}\right) + t \cdot \left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right)}{t} \]

      4. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\left(2 + \frac{2}{z}\right) + t \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{x}{y} + \left(-2\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      5. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\left(2 + \frac{2}{z}\right) + t \cdot \left(\frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{-2}\right)}{t} \]

   5. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\left(2 + \frac{2}{z}\right) + t \cdot \left(\frac{x}{y} + -2\right)}{t}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around 0 99.3%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\left(2 + \frac{2}{z}\right) + \color{blue}{-2 \cdot t}}{t} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.3%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\left(2 + \frac{2}{z}\right) + \color{blue}{t \cdot -2}}{t} \]

   8. Simplified 99.3%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\left(2 + \frac{2}{z}\right) + \color{blue}{t \cdot -2}}{t} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in t around inf 40.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-2} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 52.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{x}{y} \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+16} \lor \neg \left(\frac{x}{y} \leq 4 \cdot 10^{-19}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-2\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 15: 61.8% accurate, 1.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -1.18 \cdot 10^{+33} \lor \neg \left(t \leq 3.5 \cdot 10^{-64}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{y} - 2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\frac{2}{t}}{z}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= t -1.18e+33) (not (<= t 3.5e-64)))
   (- (/ x y) 2.0)
   (/ (/ 2.0 t) z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((t <= -1.18e+33) || !(t <= 3.5e-64)) {
		tmp = (x / y) - 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = (2.0 / t) / z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((t <= (-1.18d+33)) .or. (.not. (t <= 3.5d-64))) then
        tmp = (x / y) - 2.0d0
    else
        tmp = (2.0d0 / t) / z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((t <= -1.18e+33) || !(t <= 3.5e-64)) {
		tmp = (x / y) - 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = (2.0 / t) / z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (t <= -1.18e+33) or not (t <= 3.5e-64):
		tmp = (x / y) - 2.0
	else:
		tmp = (2.0 / t) / z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((t <= -1.18e+33) || !(t <= 3.5e-64))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x / y) - 2.0);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(2.0 / t) / z);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((t <= -1.18e+33) || ~((t <= 3.5e-64)))
		tmp = (x / y) - 2.0;
	else
		tmp = (2.0 / t) / z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[t, -1.18e+33], N[Not[LessEqual[t, 3.5e-64]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision] - 2.0), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(2.0 / t), $MachinePrecision] / z), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if t < -1.17999999999999993e33 or 3.5000000000000003e-64 < t

   1. Initial program 81.0%

      \[\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around inf 82.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{y} - 2} \]

   if -1.17999999999999993e33 < t < 3.5000000000000003e-64

   1. Initial program 97.3%

      \[\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 52.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2}{t \cdot z}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/r* 52.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{2}{t}}{z}} \]

      2. div-inv 52.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2}{t} \cdot \frac{1}{z}} \]

   5. Applied egg-rr 52.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2}{t} \cdot \frac{1}{z}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. un-div-inv 52.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{2}{t}}{z}} \]

   7. Applied egg-rr 52.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{2}{t}}{z}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 67.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -1.18 \cdot 10^{+33} \lor \neg \left(t \leq 3.5 \cdot 10^{-64}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{y} - 2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\frac{2}{t}}{z}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 16: 61.7% accurate, 1.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -5.9 \cdot 10^{+32} \lor \neg \left(t \leq 3.3 \cdot 10^{-64}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{y} - 2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{2}{z \cdot t}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= t -5.9e+32) (not (<= t 3.3e-64)))
   (- (/ x y) 2.0)
   (/ 2.0 (* z t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((t <= -5.9e+32) || !(t <= 3.3e-64)) {
		tmp = (x / y) - 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 / (z * t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((t <= (-5.9d+32)) .or. (.not. (t <= 3.3d-64))) then
        tmp = (x / y) - 2.0d0
    else
        tmp = 2.0d0 / (z * t)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((t <= -5.9e+32) || !(t <= 3.3e-64)) {
		tmp = (x / y) - 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 / (z * t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (t <= -5.9e+32) or not (t <= 3.3e-64):
		tmp = (x / y) - 2.0
	else:
		tmp = 2.0 / (z * t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((t <= -5.9e+32) || !(t <= 3.3e-64))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x / y) - 2.0);
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 / Float64(z * t));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((t <= -5.9e+32) || ~((t <= 3.3e-64)))
		tmp = (x / y) - 2.0;
	else
		tmp = 2.0 / (z * t);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[t, -5.9e+32], N[Not[LessEqual[t, 3.3e-64]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision] - 2.0), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 / N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if t < -5.89999999999999965e32 or 3.2999999999999999e-64 < t

   1. Initial program 81.0%

      \[\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around inf 82.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{y} - 2} \]

   if -5.89999999999999965e32 < t < 3.2999999999999999e-64

   1. Initial program 97.3%

      \[\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 52.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2}{t \cdot z}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 67.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -5.9 \cdot 10^{+32} \lor \neg \left(t \leq 3.3 \cdot 10^{-64}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{y} - 2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{2}{z \cdot t}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 17: 37.3% accurate, 1.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -1:\\ \;\;\;\;-2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 2.1 \cdot 10^{-16}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{2}{t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= t -1.0) -2.0 (if (<= t 2.1e-16) (/ 2.0 t) -2.0)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (t <= -1.0) {
		tmp = -2.0;
	} else if (t <= 2.1e-16) {
		tmp = 2.0 / t;
	} else {
		tmp = -2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (t <= (-1.0d0)) then
        tmp = -2.0d0
    else if (t <= 2.1d-16) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 / t
    else
        tmp = -2.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (t <= -1.0) {
		tmp = -2.0;
	} else if (t <= 2.1e-16) {
		tmp = 2.0 / t;
	} else {
		tmp = -2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if t <= -1.0:
		tmp = -2.0
	elif t <= 2.1e-16:
		tmp = 2.0 / t
	else:
		tmp = -2.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t <= -1.0)
		tmp = -2.0;
	elseif (t <= 2.1e-16)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 / t);
	else
		tmp = -2.0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t <= -1.0)
		tmp = -2.0;
	elseif (t <= 2.1e-16)
		tmp = 2.0 / t;
	else
		tmp = -2.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[t, -1.0], -2.0, If[LessEqual[t, 2.1e-16], N[(2.0 / t), $MachinePrecision], -2.0]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if t < -1 or 2.1000000000000001e-16 < t

   1. Initial program 80.5%

      \[\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around 0 88.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2 + \left(2 \cdot \frac{1}{z} + t \cdot \left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right)\right)}{t}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+r+ 88.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(2 + 2 \cdot \frac{1}{z}\right) + t \cdot \left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right)}}{t} \]

      2. associate-*r/ 88.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\left(2 + \color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot 1}{z}}\right) + t \cdot \left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right)}{t} \]

      3. metadata-eval 88.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\left(2 + \frac{\color{blue}{2}}{z}\right) + t \cdot \left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right)}{t} \]

      4. sub-neg 88.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\left(2 + \frac{2}{z}\right) + t \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{x}{y} + \left(-2\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      5. metadata-eval 88.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\left(2 + \frac{2}{z}\right) + t \cdot \left(\frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{-2}\right)}{t} \]

   5. Simplified 88.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\left(2 + \frac{2}{z}\right) + t \cdot \left(\frac{x}{y} + -2\right)}{t}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around 0 60.4%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\left(2 + \frac{2}{z}\right) + \color{blue}{-2 \cdot t}}{t} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 60.4%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\left(2 + \frac{2}{z}\right) + \color{blue}{t \cdot -2}}{t} \]

   8. Simplified 60.4%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\left(2 + \frac{2}{z}\right) + \color{blue}{t \cdot -2}}{t} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in t around inf 40.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-2} \]

   if -1 < t < 2.1000000000000001e-16

   1. Initial program 97.4%

      \[\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 52.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{2 \cdot \frac{1 - t}{t}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. div-sub 52.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{t} - \frac{t}{t}\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 52.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{t} + \left(-\frac{t}{t}\right)\right)} \]

      3. *-inverses 52.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + 2 \cdot \left(\frac{1}{t} + \left(-\color{blue}{1}\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 52.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + 2 \cdot \left(\frac{1}{t} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   5. Simplified 52.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\frac{1}{t} + -1\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around 0 28.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2}{t}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 18: 20.1% accurate, 17.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -2 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 -2.0)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return -2.0;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = -2.0d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return -2.0;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return -2.0

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return -2.0
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = -2.0;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := -2.0

Derivation

1. Initial program 88.9%

   \[\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in t around 0 93.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2 + \left(2 \cdot \frac{1}{z} + t \cdot \left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right)\right)}{t}} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-+r+ 93.2%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(2 + 2 \cdot \frac{1}{z}\right) + t \cdot \left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right)}}{t} \]

   2. associate-*r/ 93.2%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\left(2 + \color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot 1}{z}}\right) + t \cdot \left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right)}{t} \]

   3. metadata-eval 93.2%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\left(2 + \frac{\color{blue}{2}}{z}\right) + t \cdot \left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right)}{t} \]

   4. sub-neg 93.2%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\left(2 + \frac{2}{z}\right) + t \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{x}{y} + \left(-2\right)\right)}}{t} \]

   5. metadata-eval 93.2%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\left(2 + \frac{2}{z}\right) + t \cdot \left(\frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{-2}\right)}{t} \]

5. Simplified 93.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\left(2 + \frac{2}{z}\right) + t \cdot \left(\frac{x}{y} + -2\right)}{t}} \]

6. Taylor expanded in x around 0 68.0%

   \[\leadsto \frac{\left(2 + \frac{2}{z}\right) + \color{blue}{-2 \cdot t}}{t} \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 68.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\left(2 + \frac{2}{z}\right) + \color{blue}{t \cdot -2}}{t} \]

8. Simplified 68.0%

   \[\leadsto \frac{\left(2 + \frac{2}{z}\right) + \color{blue}{t \cdot -2}}{t} \]

9. Taylor expanded in t around inf 21.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-2} \]
10. Add Preprocessing

Developer Target 1: 99.0% accurate, 1.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{\frac{2}{z} + 2}{t} - \left(2 - \frac{x}{y}\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- (/ (+ (/ 2.0 z) 2.0) t) (- 2.0 (/ x y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((2.0 / z) + 2.0) / t) - (2.0 - (x / y));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (((2.0d0 / z) + 2.0d0) / t) - (2.0d0 - (x / y))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((2.0 / z) + 2.0) / t) - (2.0 - (x / y));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (((2.0 / z) + 2.0) / t) - (2.0 - (x / y))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(2.0 / z) + 2.0) / t) - Float64(2.0 - Float64(x / y)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (((2.0 / z) + 2.0) / t) - (2.0 - (x / y));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(2.0 / z), $MachinePrecision] + 2.0), $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision] - N[(2.0 - N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024137 
(FPCore (x y z t)
  :name "Data.HashTable.ST.Basic:computeOverhead from hashtables-1.2.0.2"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (! :herbie-platform default (- (/ (+ (/ 2 z) 2) t) (- 2 (/ x y))))

  (+ (/ x y) (/ (+ 2.0 (* (* z 2.0) (- 1.0 t))) (* t z))))