System.Random.MWC.Distributions:truncatedExp from mwc-random-0.13.3.2

Percentage Accurate: 60.6% → 98.3%

Time: 20.5s

Alternatives: 10

Speedup: 211.0×

• could not determine a ground truth

  1. x = -2.776694127715573e+94
  2. y = 5.368586266814229e-202
  3. z = 1.0450709538404929e+226
  4. t = 3.228345718880657e-96

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- x (/ (log (+ (- 1.0 y) (* y (exp z)))) t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (log(((1.0 - y) + (y * exp(z)))) / t);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x - (log(((1.0d0 - y) + (y * exp(z)))) / t)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (Math.log(((1.0 - y) + (y * Math.exp(z)))) / t);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x - (math.log(((1.0 - y) + (y * math.exp(z)))) / t)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x - Float64(log(Float64(Float64(1.0 - y) + Float64(y * exp(z)))) / t))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x - (log(((1.0 - y) + (y * exp(z)))) / t);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x - N[(N[Log[N[(N[(1.0 - y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * N[Exp[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 60.6% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- x (/ (log (+ (- 1.0 y) (* y (exp z)))) t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (log(((1.0 - y) + (y * exp(z)))) / t);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x - (log(((1.0d0 - y) + (y * exp(z)))) / t)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (Math.log(((1.0 - y) + (y * Math.exp(z)))) / t);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x - (math.log(((1.0 - y) + (y * math.exp(z)))) / t)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x - Float64(log(Float64(Float64(1.0 - y) + Float64(y * exp(z)))) / t))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x - (log(((1.0 - y) + (y * exp(z)))) / t);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x - N[(N[Log[N[(N[(1.0 - y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * N[Exp[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 98.3% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (- x (/ (log1p (* y (expm1 z))) t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (log1p((y * expm1(z))) / t);
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (Math.log1p((y * Math.expm1(z))) / t);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x - (math.log1p((y * math.expm1(z))) / t)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x - Float64(log1p(Float64(y * expm1(z))) / t))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x - N[(N[Log[1 + N[(y * N[(Exp[z] - 1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 60.5%

   \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-+l- 76.8%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

   2. sub-neg 76.8%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)\right)}}{t} \]

   3. log1p-define 82.3%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

   4. neg-sub0 82.3%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{0 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   5. associate-+l- 82.3%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(0 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

   6. neg-sub0 82.3%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

   7. +-commutative 82.3%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   8. unsub-neg 82.3%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

   9. *-rgt-identity 82.3%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

   10. distribute-lft-out-- 82.3%

       \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   11. expm1-define 98.7%

       \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

3. Simplified 98.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]
4. Add Preprocessing
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 93.6% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;e^{z} \leq 0:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1}{\frac{\frac{t}{1 - e^{z}} - 0.5 \cdot \left(y \cdot t\right)}{y}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(1 + z \cdot \left(0.5 + z \cdot \left(0.16666666666666666 + z \cdot 0.041666666666666664\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)}{t}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (exp z) 0.0)
   (+ x (/ 1.0 (/ (- (/ t (- 1.0 (exp z))) (* 0.5 (* y t))) y)))
   (-
    x
    (/
     (log1p
      (*
       y
       (*
        z
        (+
         1.0
         (*
          z
          (+ 0.5 (* z (+ 0.16666666666666666 (* z 0.041666666666666664)))))))))
     t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (exp(z) <= 0.0) {
		tmp = x + (1.0 / (((t / (1.0 - exp(z))) - (0.5 * (y * t))) / y));
	} else {
		tmp = x - (log1p((y * (z * (1.0 + (z * (0.5 + (z * (0.16666666666666666 + (z * 0.041666666666666664))))))))) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (Math.exp(z) <= 0.0) {
		tmp = x + (1.0 / (((t / (1.0 - Math.exp(z))) - (0.5 * (y * t))) / y));
	} else {
		tmp = x - (Math.log1p((y * (z * (1.0 + (z * (0.5 + (z * (0.16666666666666666 + (z * 0.041666666666666664))))))))) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if math.exp(z) <= 0.0:
		tmp = x + (1.0 / (((t / (1.0 - math.exp(z))) - (0.5 * (y * t))) / y))
	else:
		tmp = x - (math.log1p((y * (z * (1.0 + (z * (0.5 + (z * (0.16666666666666666 + (z * 0.041666666666666664))))))))) / t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (exp(z) <= 0.0)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(1.0 / Float64(Float64(Float64(t / Float64(1.0 - exp(z))) - Float64(0.5 * Float64(y * t))) / y)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(log1p(Float64(y * Float64(z * Float64(1.0 + Float64(z * Float64(0.5 + Float64(z * Float64(0.16666666666666666 + Float64(z * 0.041666666666666664))))))))) / t));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[N[Exp[z], $MachinePrecision], 0.0], N[(x + N[(1.0 / N[(N[(N[(t / N[(1.0 - N[Exp[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(0.5 * N[(y * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x - N[(N[Log[1 + N[(y * N[(z * N[(1.0 + N[(z * N[(0.5 + N[(z * N[(0.16666666666666666 + N[(z * 0.041666666666666664), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (exp.f64 z) < 0.0

   1. Initial program 82.2%

      \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l- 82.2%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      2. sub-neg 82.2%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      3. log1p-define 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      4. neg-sub0 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{0 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      5. associate-+l- 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(0 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

      6. neg-sub0 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

      7. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      8. unsub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

      9. *-rgt-identity 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

      10. distribute-lft-out-- 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      11. expm1-define 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. clear-num 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{t}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}}} \]

      2. inv-pow 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{{\left(\frac{t}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}\right)}^{-1}} \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 100.0%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{{\left(\frac{t}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}\right)}^{-1}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow-1 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{t}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}}} \]

   8. Applied egg-rr 100.0%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{t}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}}} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in y around 0 90.1%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{1}{\color{blue}{\frac{0.5 \cdot \left(t \cdot y\right) + \frac{t}{e^{z} - 1}}{y}}} \]

   if 0.0 < (exp.f64 z)

   1. Initial program 51.5%

      \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l- 74.5%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      2. sub-neg 74.5%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      3. log1p-define 75.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      4. neg-sub0 75.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{0 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      5. associate-+l- 75.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(0 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

      6. neg-sub0 75.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

      7. +-commutative 75.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      8. unsub-neg 75.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

      9. *-rgt-identity 75.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

      10. distribute-lft-out-- 75.0%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      11. expm1-define 98.1%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   3. Simplified 98.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 97.4%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot \left(1 + z \cdot \left(0.5 + z \cdot \left(0.16666666666666666 + 0.041666666666666664 \cdot z\right)\right)\right)\right)}\right)}{t} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 97.4%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(1 + z \cdot \left(0.5 + z \cdot \left(0.16666666666666666 + \color{blue}{z \cdot 0.041666666666666664}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)}{t} \]

   7. Simplified 97.4%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot \left(1 + z \cdot \left(0.5 + z \cdot \left(0.16666666666666666 + z \cdot 0.041666666666666664\right)\right)\right)\right)}\right)}{t} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 95.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;e^{z} \leq 0:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1}{\frac{\frac{t}{1 - e^{z}} - 0.5 \cdot \left(y \cdot t\right)}{y}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(1 + z \cdot \left(0.5 + z \cdot \left(0.16666666666666666 + z \cdot 0.041666666666666664\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)}{t}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 93.6% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;e^{z} \leq 0:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1}{\frac{\frac{t}{1 - e^{z}} - 0.5 \cdot \left(y \cdot t\right)}{y}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(1 + z \cdot \left(0.5 + z \cdot 0.16666666666666666\right)\right)\right)\right)}{t}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (exp z) 0.0)
   (+ x (/ 1.0 (/ (- (/ t (- 1.0 (exp z))) (* 0.5 (* y t))) y)))
   (-
    x
    (/
     (log1p (* y (* z (+ 1.0 (* z (+ 0.5 (* z 0.16666666666666666)))))))
     t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (exp(z) <= 0.0) {
		tmp = x + (1.0 / (((t / (1.0 - exp(z))) - (0.5 * (y * t))) / y));
	} else {
		tmp = x - (log1p((y * (z * (1.0 + (z * (0.5 + (z * 0.16666666666666666))))))) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (Math.exp(z) <= 0.0) {
		tmp = x + (1.0 / (((t / (1.0 - Math.exp(z))) - (0.5 * (y * t))) / y));
	} else {
		tmp = x - (Math.log1p((y * (z * (1.0 + (z * (0.5 + (z * 0.16666666666666666))))))) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if math.exp(z) <= 0.0:
		tmp = x + (1.0 / (((t / (1.0 - math.exp(z))) - (0.5 * (y * t))) / y))
	else:
		tmp = x - (math.log1p((y * (z * (1.0 + (z * (0.5 + (z * 0.16666666666666666))))))) / t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (exp(z) <= 0.0)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(1.0 / Float64(Float64(Float64(t / Float64(1.0 - exp(z))) - Float64(0.5 * Float64(y * t))) / y)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(log1p(Float64(y * Float64(z * Float64(1.0 + Float64(z * Float64(0.5 + Float64(z * 0.16666666666666666))))))) / t));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[N[Exp[z], $MachinePrecision], 0.0], N[(x + N[(1.0 / N[(N[(N[(t / N[(1.0 - N[Exp[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(0.5 * N[(y * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x - N[(N[Log[1 + N[(y * N[(z * N[(1.0 + N[(z * N[(0.5 + N[(z * 0.16666666666666666), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (exp.f64 z) < 0.0

   1. Initial program 82.2%

      \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l- 82.2%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      2. sub-neg 82.2%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      3. log1p-define 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      4. neg-sub0 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{0 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      5. associate-+l- 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(0 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

      6. neg-sub0 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

      7. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      8. unsub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

      9. *-rgt-identity 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

      10. distribute-lft-out-- 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      11. expm1-define 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. clear-num 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{t}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}}} \]

      2. inv-pow 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{{\left(\frac{t}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}\right)}^{-1}} \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 100.0%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{{\left(\frac{t}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}\right)}^{-1}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow-1 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{t}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}}} \]

   8. Applied egg-rr 100.0%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{t}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}}} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in y around 0 90.1%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{1}{\color{blue}{\frac{0.5 \cdot \left(t \cdot y\right) + \frac{t}{e^{z} - 1}}{y}}} \]

   if 0.0 < (exp.f64 z)

   1. Initial program 51.5%

      \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l- 74.5%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      2. sub-neg 74.5%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      3. log1p-define 75.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      4. neg-sub0 75.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{0 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      5. associate-+l- 75.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(0 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

      6. neg-sub0 75.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

      7. +-commutative 75.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      8. unsub-neg 75.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

      9. *-rgt-identity 75.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

      10. distribute-lft-out-- 75.0%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      11. expm1-define 98.1%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   3. Simplified 98.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 97.3%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot \left(1 + z \cdot \left(0.5 + 0.16666666666666666 \cdot z\right)\right)\right)}\right)}{t} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 97.3%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(1 + z \cdot \left(0.5 + \color{blue}{z \cdot 0.16666666666666666}\right)\right)\right)\right)}{t} \]

   7. Simplified 97.3%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot \left(1 + z \cdot \left(0.5 + z \cdot 0.16666666666666666\right)\right)\right)}\right)}{t} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 95.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;e^{z} \leq 0:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1}{\frac{\frac{t}{1 - e^{z}} - 0.5 \cdot \left(y \cdot t\right)}{y}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(1 + z \cdot \left(0.5 + z \cdot 0.16666666666666666\right)\right)\right)\right)}{t}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 93.5% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;e^{z} \leq 0:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1}{\frac{\frac{t}{1 - e^{z}} - 0.5 \cdot \left(y \cdot t\right)}{y}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(z \cdot \left(y + 0.5 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)\right)}{t}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (exp z) 0.0)
   (+ x (/ 1.0 (/ (- (/ t (- 1.0 (exp z))) (* 0.5 (* y t))) y)))
   (- x (/ (log1p (* z (+ y (* 0.5 (* y z))))) t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (exp(z) <= 0.0) {
		tmp = x + (1.0 / (((t / (1.0 - exp(z))) - (0.5 * (y * t))) / y));
	} else {
		tmp = x - (log1p((z * (y + (0.5 * (y * z))))) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (Math.exp(z) <= 0.0) {
		tmp = x + (1.0 / (((t / (1.0 - Math.exp(z))) - (0.5 * (y * t))) / y));
	} else {
		tmp = x - (Math.log1p((z * (y + (0.5 * (y * z))))) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if math.exp(z) <= 0.0:
		tmp = x + (1.0 / (((t / (1.0 - math.exp(z))) - (0.5 * (y * t))) / y))
	else:
		tmp = x - (math.log1p((z * (y + (0.5 * (y * z))))) / t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (exp(z) <= 0.0)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(1.0 / Float64(Float64(Float64(t / Float64(1.0 - exp(z))) - Float64(0.5 * Float64(y * t))) / y)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(log1p(Float64(z * Float64(y + Float64(0.5 * Float64(y * z))))) / t));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[N[Exp[z], $MachinePrecision], 0.0], N[(x + N[(1.0 / N[(N[(N[(t / N[(1.0 - N[Exp[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(0.5 * N[(y * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x - N[(N[Log[1 + N[(z * N[(y + N[(0.5 * N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (exp.f64 z) < 0.0

   1. Initial program 82.2%

      \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l- 82.2%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      2. sub-neg 82.2%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      3. log1p-define 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      4. neg-sub0 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{0 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      5. associate-+l- 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(0 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

      6. neg-sub0 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

      7. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      8. unsub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

      9. *-rgt-identity 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

      10. distribute-lft-out-- 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      11. expm1-define 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. clear-num 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{t}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}}} \]

      2. inv-pow 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{{\left(\frac{t}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}\right)}^{-1}} \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 100.0%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{{\left(\frac{t}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}\right)}^{-1}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow-1 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{t}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}}} \]

   8. Applied egg-rr 100.0%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{t}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}}} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in y around 0 90.1%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{1}{\color{blue}{\frac{0.5 \cdot \left(t \cdot y\right) + \frac{t}{e^{z} - 1}}{y}}} \]

   if 0.0 < (exp.f64 z)

   1. Initial program 51.5%

      \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l- 74.5%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      2. sub-neg 74.5%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      3. log1p-define 75.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      4. neg-sub0 75.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{0 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      5. associate-+l- 75.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(0 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

      6. neg-sub0 75.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

      7. +-commutative 75.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      8. unsub-neg 75.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

      9. *-rgt-identity 75.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

      10. distribute-lft-out-- 75.0%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      11. expm1-define 98.1%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   3. Simplified 98.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 97.3%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + 0.5 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)}\right)}{t} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 95.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;e^{z} \leq 0:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1}{\frac{\frac{t}{1 - e^{z}} - 0.5 \cdot \left(y \cdot t\right)}{y}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(z \cdot \left(y + 0.5 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)\right)}{t}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 91.1% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -7200000000:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}{t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(z \cdot \left(y + 0.5 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)\right)}{t}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -7200000000.0)
   (- x (/ (* y (expm1 z)) t))
   (- x (/ (log1p (* z (+ y (* 0.5 (* y z))))) t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -7200000000.0) {
		tmp = x - ((y * expm1(z)) / t);
	} else {
		tmp = x - (log1p((z * (y + (0.5 * (y * z))))) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -7200000000.0) {
		tmp = x - ((y * Math.expm1(z)) / t);
	} else {
		tmp = x - (Math.log1p((z * (y + (0.5 * (y * z))))) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -7200000000.0:
		tmp = x - ((y * math.expm1(z)) / t)
	else:
		tmp = x - (math.log1p((z * (y + (0.5 * (y * z))))) / t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -7200000000.0)
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(Float64(y * expm1(z)) / t));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(log1p(Float64(z * Float64(y + Float64(0.5 * Float64(y * z))))) / t));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[z, -7200000000.0], N[(x - N[(N[(y * N[(Exp[z] - 1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x - N[(N[Log[1 + N[(z * N[(y + N[(0.5 * N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -7.2e9

   1. Initial program 82.0%

      \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l- 82.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      2. sub-neg 82.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      3. log1p-define 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      4. neg-sub0 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{0 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      5. associate-+l- 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(0 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

      6. neg-sub0 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

      7. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      8. unsub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

      9. *-rgt-identity 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

      10. distribute-lft-out-- 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      11. expm1-define 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 82.5%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}}{t} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. expm1-define 82.5%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}}{t} \]

   7. Simplified 82.5%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}}{t} \]

   if -7.2e9 < z

   1. Initial program 51.8%

      \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l- 74.7%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      2. sub-neg 74.7%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      3. log1p-define 75.2%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      4. neg-sub0 75.2%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{0 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      5. associate-+l- 75.2%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(0 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

      6. neg-sub0 75.2%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

      7. +-commutative 75.2%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      8. unsub-neg 75.2%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

      9. *-rgt-identity 75.2%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

      10. distribute-lft-out-- 75.2%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      11. expm1-define 98.1%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   3. Simplified 98.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 97.3%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + 0.5 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)}\right)}{t} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 91.0% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -7500000000:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}{t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot z\right)}{t}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -7500000000.0)
   (- x (/ (* y (expm1 z)) t))
   (- x (/ (log1p (* y z)) t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -7500000000.0) {
		tmp = x - ((y * expm1(z)) / t);
	} else {
		tmp = x - (log1p((y * z)) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -7500000000.0) {
		tmp = x - ((y * Math.expm1(z)) / t);
	} else {
		tmp = x - (Math.log1p((y * z)) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -7500000000.0:
		tmp = x - ((y * math.expm1(z)) / t)
	else:
		tmp = x - (math.log1p((y * z)) / t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -7500000000.0)
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(Float64(y * expm1(z)) / t));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(log1p(Float64(y * z)) / t));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[z, -7500000000.0], N[(x - N[(N[(y * N[(Exp[z] - 1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x - N[(N[Log[1 + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -7.5e9

   1. Initial program 82.0%

      \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l- 82.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      2. sub-neg 82.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      3. log1p-define 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      4. neg-sub0 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{0 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      5. associate-+l- 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(0 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

      6. neg-sub0 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

      7. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      8. unsub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

      9. *-rgt-identity 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

      10. distribute-lft-out-- 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      11. expm1-define 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 82.5%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}}{t} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. expm1-define 82.5%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}}{t} \]

   7. Simplified 82.5%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}}{t} \]

   if -7.5e9 < z

   1. Initial program 51.8%

      \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l- 74.7%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      2. sub-neg 74.7%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      3. log1p-define 75.2%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      4. neg-sub0 75.2%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{0 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      5. associate-+l- 75.2%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(0 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

      6. neg-sub0 75.2%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

      7. +-commutative 75.2%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      8. unsub-neg 75.2%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

      9. *-rgt-identity 75.2%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

      10. distribute-lft-out-- 75.2%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      11. expm1-define 98.1%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   3. Simplified 98.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 97.3%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{z}\right)}{t} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 91.0% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -31000000000:\\ \;\;\;\;x - y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}{t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot z\right)}{t}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -31000000000.0)
   (- x (* y (/ (expm1 z) t)))
   (- x (/ (log1p (* y z)) t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -31000000000.0) {
		tmp = x - (y * (expm1(z) / t));
	} else {
		tmp = x - (log1p((y * z)) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -31000000000.0) {
		tmp = x - (y * (Math.expm1(z) / t));
	} else {
		tmp = x - (Math.log1p((y * z)) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -31000000000.0:
		tmp = x - (y * (math.expm1(z) / t))
	else:
		tmp = x - (math.log1p((y * z)) / t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -31000000000.0)
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(y * Float64(expm1(z) / t)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(log1p(Float64(y * z)) / t));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[z, -31000000000.0], N[(x - N[(y * N[(N[(Exp[z] - 1), $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x - N[(N[Log[1 + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -3.1e10

   1. Initial program 82.0%

      \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l- 82.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      2. sub-neg 82.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      3. log1p-define 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      4. neg-sub0 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{0 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      5. associate-+l- 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(0 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

      6. neg-sub0 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

      7. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      8. unsub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

      9. *-rgt-identity 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

      10. distribute-lft-out-- 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      11. expm1-define 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 82.5%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}{t}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. expm1-define 82.5%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}}{t} \]

      2. associate-/l* 82.4%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}{t}} \]

   7. Simplified 82.4%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}{t}} \]

   if -3.1e10 < z

   1. Initial program 51.8%

      \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l- 74.7%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      2. sub-neg 74.7%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      3. log1p-define 75.2%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      4. neg-sub0 75.2%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{0 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      5. associate-+l- 75.2%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(0 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

      6. neg-sub0 75.2%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

      7. +-commutative 75.2%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      8. unsub-neg 75.2%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

      9. *-rgt-identity 75.2%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

      10. distribute-lft-out-- 75.2%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      11. expm1-define 98.1%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   3. Simplified 98.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 97.3%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{z}\right)}{t} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 85.9% accurate, 2.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x - y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}{t} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (- x (* y (/ (expm1 z) t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (y * (expm1(z) / t));
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (y * (Math.expm1(z) / t));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x - (y * (math.expm1(z) / t))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x - Float64(y * Float64(expm1(z) / t)))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x - N[(y * N[(N[(Exp[z] - 1), $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 60.5%

   \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-+l- 76.8%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

   2. sub-neg 76.8%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)\right)}}{t} \]

   3. log1p-define 82.3%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

   4. neg-sub0 82.3%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{0 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   5. associate-+l- 82.3%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(0 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

   6. neg-sub0 82.3%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

   7. +-commutative 82.3%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   8. unsub-neg 82.3%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

   9. *-rgt-identity 82.3%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

   10. distribute-lft-out-- 82.3%

       \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   11. expm1-define 98.7%

       \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

3. Simplified 98.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 76.7%

   \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}{t}} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. expm1-define 85.2%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}}{t} \]

   2. associate-/l* 86.4%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}{t}} \]

7. Simplified 86.4%

   \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}{t}} \]
8. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 81.8% accurate, 17.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -7200000000:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - y \cdot \frac{z}{t}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -7200000000.0) x (- x (* y (/ z t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -7200000000.0) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x - (y * (z / t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-7200000000.0d0)) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = x - (y * (z / t))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -7200000000.0) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x - (y * (z / t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -7200000000.0:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = x - (y * (z / t))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -7200000000.0)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(y * Float64(z / t)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -7200000000.0)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = x - (y * (z / t));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[z, -7200000000.0], x, N[(x - N[(y * N[(z / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -7.2e9

   1. Initial program 82.0%

      \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l- 82.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      2. sub-neg 82.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      3. log1p-define 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      4. neg-sub0 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{0 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      5. associate-+l- 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(0 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

      6. neg-sub0 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

      7. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      8. unsub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

      9. *-rgt-identity 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

      10. distribute-lft-out-- 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      11. expm1-define 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 69.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if -7.2e9 < z

   1. Initial program 51.8%

      \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l- 74.7%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      2. sub-neg 74.7%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      3. log1p-define 75.2%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      4. neg-sub0 75.2%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{0 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      5. associate-+l- 75.2%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(0 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

      6. neg-sub0 75.2%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

      7. +-commutative 75.2%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      8. unsub-neg 75.2%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

      9. *-rgt-identity 75.2%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

      10. distribute-lft-out-- 75.2%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      11. expm1-define 98.1%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   3. Simplified 98.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. clear-num 98.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{t}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}}} \]

      2. inv-pow 98.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{{\left(\frac{t}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}\right)}^{-1}} \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 98.1%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{{\left(\frac{t}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}\right)}^{-1}} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in z around 0 85.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + -1 \cdot \frac{y \cdot z}{t}} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 85.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{y \cdot z}{t}\right)} \]

      2. unsub-neg 85.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{y \cdot z}{t}} \]

      3. associate-/l* 87.6%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{z}{t}} \]

   9. Simplified 87.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - y \cdot \frac{z}{t}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 70.3% accurate, 211.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 60.5%

   \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-+l- 76.8%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

   2. sub-neg 76.8%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)\right)}}{t} \]

   3. log1p-define 82.3%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

   4. neg-sub0 82.3%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{0 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   5. associate-+l- 82.3%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(0 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

   6. neg-sub0 82.3%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

   7. +-commutative 82.3%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   8. unsub-neg 82.3%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

   9. *-rgt-identity 82.3%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

   10. distribute-lft-out-- 82.3%

       \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   11. expm1-define 98.7%

       \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

3. Simplified 98.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 72.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Developer Target 1: 73.9% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \frac{-0.5}{y \cdot t}\\ \mathbf{if}\;z < -2.8874623088207947 \cdot 10^{+119}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x - \frac{t\_1}{z \cdot z}\right) - t\_1 \cdot \frac{\frac{2}{z}}{z \cdot z}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{\log \left(1 + z \cdot y\right)}{t}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (/ (- 0.5) (* y t))))
   (if (< z -2.8874623088207947e+119)
     (- (- x (/ t_1 (* z z))) (* t_1 (/ (/ 2.0 z) (* z z))))
     (- x (/ (log (+ 1.0 (* z y))) t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = -0.5 / (y * t);
	double tmp;
	if (z < -2.8874623088207947e+119) {
		tmp = (x - (t_1 / (z * z))) - (t_1 * ((2.0 / z) / (z * z)));
	} else {
		tmp = x - (log((1.0 + (z * y))) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = -0.5d0 / (y * t)
    if (z < (-2.8874623088207947d+119)) then
        tmp = (x - (t_1 / (z * z))) - (t_1 * ((2.0d0 / z) / (z * z)))
    else
        tmp = x - (log((1.0d0 + (z * y))) / t)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = -0.5 / (y * t);
	double tmp;
	if (z < -2.8874623088207947e+119) {
		tmp = (x - (t_1 / (z * z))) - (t_1 * ((2.0 / z) / (z * z)));
	} else {
		tmp = x - (Math.log((1.0 + (z * y))) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	t_1 = -0.5 / (y * t)
	tmp = 0
	if z < -2.8874623088207947e+119:
		tmp = (x - (t_1 / (z * z))) - (t_1 * ((2.0 / z) / (z * z)))
	else:
		tmp = x - (math.log((1.0 + (z * y))) / t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(-0.5) / Float64(y * t))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z < -2.8874623088207947e+119)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x - Float64(t_1 / Float64(z * z))) - Float64(t_1 * Float64(Float64(2.0 / z) / Float64(z * z))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(log(Float64(1.0 + Float64(z * y))) / t));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = -0.5 / (y * t);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z < -2.8874623088207947e+119)
		tmp = (x - (t_1 / (z * z))) - (t_1 * ((2.0 / z) / (z * z)));
	else
		tmp = x - (log((1.0 + (z * y))) / t);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[((-0.5) / N[(y * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[Less[z, -2.8874623088207947e+119], N[(N[(x - N[(t$95$1 / N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(t$95$1 * N[(N[(2.0 / z), $MachinePrecision] / N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x - N[(N[Log[N[(1.0 + N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024137 
(FPCore (x y z t)
  :name "System.Random.MWC.Distributions:truncatedExp from mwc-random-0.13.3.2"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (! :herbie-platform default (if (< z -288746230882079470000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000) (- (- x (/ (/ (- 1/2) (* y t)) (* z z))) (* (/ (- 1/2) (* y t)) (/ (/ 2 z) (* z z)))) (- x (/ (log (+ 1 (* z y))) t))))

  (- x (/ (log (+ (- 1.0 y) (* y (exp z)))) t)))