Graphics.Rasterific.Svg.PathConverter:segmentToBezier from rasterific-svg-0.2.3.1, C

Percentage Accurate: 99.9% → 99.9%

Time: 8.5s

Alternatives: 10

Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x + \sin y\right) + z \cdot \cos y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (+ x (sin y)) (* z (cos y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x + sin(y)) + (z * cos(y));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x + sin(y)) + (z * cos(y))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x + Math.sin(y)) + (z * Math.cos(y));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x + math.sin(y)) + (z * math.cos(y))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x + sin(y)) + Float64(z * cos(y)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x + sin(y)) + (z * cos(y));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x + N[Sin[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * N[Cos[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x + \sin y\right) + z \cdot \cos y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (+ x (sin y)) (* z (cos y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x + sin(y)) + (z * cos(y));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x + sin(y)) + (z * cos(y))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x + Math.sin(y)) + (z * Math.cos(y));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x + math.sin(y)) + (z * math.cos(y))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x + sin(y)) + Float64(z * cos(y)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x + sin(y)) + (z * cos(y));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x + N[Sin[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * N[Cos[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.9% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \cos y, x + \sin y\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (fma z (cos y) (+ x (sin y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return fma(z, cos(y), (x + sin(y)));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return fma(z, cos(y), Float64(x + sin(y)))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(z * N[Cos[y], $MachinePrecision] + N[(x + N[Sin[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(x + \sin y\right) + z \cdot \cos y \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \cos y + \left(x + \sin y\right)} \]

   2. fma-define 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \cos y, x + \sin y\right)} \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \cos y, x + \sin y\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ z \cdot \cos y + \left(x + \sin y\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* z (cos y)) (+ x (sin y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (z * cos(y)) + (x + sin(y));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (z * cos(y)) + (x + sin(y))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (z * Math.cos(y)) + (x + Math.sin(y));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (z * math.cos(y)) + (x + math.sin(y))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(z * cos(y)) + Float64(x + sin(y)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (z * cos(y)) + (x + sin(y));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(z * N[Cos[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x + N[Sin[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(x + \sin y\right) + z \cdot \cos y \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto z \cdot \cos y + \left(x + \sin y\right) \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 95.4% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.4 \cdot 10^{-8} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 4.1 \cdot 10^{-53}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \cos y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \sin y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -2.4e-8) (not (<= z 4.1e-53)))
   (+ x (* z (cos y)))
   (+ x (sin y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -2.4e-8) || !(z <= 4.1e-53)) {
		tmp = x + (z * cos(y));
	} else {
		tmp = x + sin(y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-2.4d-8)) .or. (.not. (z <= 4.1d-53))) then
        tmp = x + (z * cos(y))
    else
        tmp = x + sin(y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -2.4e-8) || !(z <= 4.1e-53)) {
		tmp = x + (z * Math.cos(y));
	} else {
		tmp = x + Math.sin(y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -2.4e-8) or not (z <= 4.1e-53):
		tmp = x + (z * math.cos(y))
	else:
		tmp = x + math.sin(y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -2.4e-8) || !(z <= 4.1e-53))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * cos(y)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + sin(y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -2.4e-8) || ~((z <= 4.1e-53)))
		tmp = x + (z * cos(y));
	else
		tmp = x + sin(y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -2.4e-8], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 4.1e-53]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(z * N[Cos[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[Sin[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -2.39999999999999998e-8 or 4.1000000000000001e-53 < z

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(x + \sin y\right) + z \cdot \cos y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 99.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} + z \cdot \cos y \]

   if -2.39999999999999998e-8 < z < 4.1000000000000001e-53

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + \sin y\right) + z \cdot \cos y \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \cos y + \left(x + \sin y\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \cos y, x + \sin y\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \cos y, x + \sin y\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 94.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \sin y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 94.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sin y + x} \]

   7. Simplified 94.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sin y + x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 96.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.4 \cdot 10^{-8} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 4.1 \cdot 10^{-53}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \cos y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \sin y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 83.3% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -115000000 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 3 \cdot 10^{+42}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \cos y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \sin y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -115000000.0) (not (<= z 3e+42))) (* z (cos y)) (+ x (sin y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -115000000.0) || !(z <= 3e+42)) {
		tmp = z * cos(y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + sin(y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-115000000.0d0)) .or. (.not. (z <= 3d+42))) then
        tmp = z * cos(y)
    else
        tmp = x + sin(y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -115000000.0) || !(z <= 3e+42)) {
		tmp = z * Math.cos(y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + Math.sin(y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -115000000.0) or not (z <= 3e+42):
		tmp = z * math.cos(y)
	else:
		tmp = x + math.sin(y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -115000000.0) || !(z <= 3e+42))
		tmp = Float64(z * cos(y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + sin(y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -115000000.0) || ~((z <= 3e+42)))
		tmp = z * cos(y);
	else
		tmp = x + sin(y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -115000000.0], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 3e+42]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(z * N[Cos[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[Sin[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -1.15e8 or 3.00000000000000029e42 < z

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(x + \sin y\right) + z \cdot \cos y \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \cos y + \left(x + \sin y\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \cos y, x + \sin y\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \cos y, x + \sin y\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 73.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \cos y} \]

   if -1.15e8 < z < 3.00000000000000029e42

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + \sin y\right) + z \cdot \cos y \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \cos y + \left(x + \sin y\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \cos y, x + \sin y\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \cos y, x + \sin y\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 91.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \sin y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 91.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sin y + x} \]

   7. Simplified 91.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sin y + x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 82.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -115000000 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 3 \cdot 10^{+42}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \cos y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \sin y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 72.6% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -580000000000 \lor \neg \left(x \leq 2.3 \cdot 10^{-98}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z + x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \cos y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -580000000000.0) (not (<= x 2.3e-98))) (+ z x) (* z (cos y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -580000000000.0) || !(x <= 2.3e-98)) {
		tmp = z + x;
	} else {
		tmp = z * cos(y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-580000000000.0d0)) .or. (.not. (x <= 2.3d-98))) then
        tmp = z + x
    else
        tmp = z * cos(y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -580000000000.0) || !(x <= 2.3e-98)) {
		tmp = z + x;
	} else {
		tmp = z * Math.cos(y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -580000000000.0) or not (x <= 2.3e-98):
		tmp = z + x
	else:
		tmp = z * math.cos(y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -580000000000.0) || !(x <= 2.3e-98))
		tmp = Float64(z + x);
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * cos(y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -580000000000.0) || ~((x <= 2.3e-98)))
		tmp = z + x;
	else
		tmp = z * cos(y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -580000000000.0], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 2.3e-98]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(z + x), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * N[Cos[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -5.8e11 or 2.30000000000000001e-98 < x

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + \sin y\right) + z \cdot \cos y \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \cos y + \left(x + \sin y\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \cos y, x + \sin y\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \cos y, x + \sin y\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 83.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + z} \]

   if -5.8e11 < x < 2.30000000000000001e-98

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(x + \sin y\right) + z \cdot \cos y \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \cos y + \left(x + \sin y\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \cos y, x + \sin y\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \cos y, x + \sin y\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 64.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \cos y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 75.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -580000000000 \lor \neg \left(x \leq 2.3 \cdot 10^{-98}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z + x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \cos y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 69.1% accurate, 9.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -3.4 \cdot 10^{+21} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1.4 \cdot 10^{+28}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z + x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(z + x\right) + y \cdot \left(1 + -0.5 \cdot \left(z \cdot y\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -3.4e+21) (not (<= y 1.4e+28)))
   (+ z x)
   (+ (+ z x) (* y (+ 1.0 (* -0.5 (* z y)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -3.4e+21) || !(y <= 1.4e+28)) {
		tmp = z + x;
	} else {
		tmp = (z + x) + (y * (1.0 + (-0.5 * (z * y))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-3.4d+21)) .or. (.not. (y <= 1.4d+28))) then
        tmp = z + x
    else
        tmp = (z + x) + (y * (1.0d0 + ((-0.5d0) * (z * y))))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -3.4e+21) || !(y <= 1.4e+28)) {
		tmp = z + x;
	} else {
		tmp = (z + x) + (y * (1.0 + (-0.5 * (z * y))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -3.4e+21) or not (y <= 1.4e+28):
		tmp = z + x
	else:
		tmp = (z + x) + (y * (1.0 + (-0.5 * (z * y))))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -3.4e+21) || !(y <= 1.4e+28))
		tmp = Float64(z + x);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(z + x) + Float64(y * Float64(1.0 + Float64(-0.5 * Float64(z * y)))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -3.4e+21) || ~((y <= 1.4e+28)))
		tmp = z + x;
	else
		tmp = (z + x) + (y * (1.0 + (-0.5 * (z * y))));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -3.4e+21], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 1.4e+28]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(z + x), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(z + x), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * N[(1.0 + N[(-0.5 * N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -3.4e21 or 1.4000000000000001e28 < y

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(x + \sin y\right) + z \cdot \cos y \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \cos y + \left(x + \sin y\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \cos y, x + \sin y\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \cos y, x + \sin y\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 45.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + z} \]

   if -3.4e21 < y < 1.4000000000000001e28

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + \sin y\right) + z \cdot \cos y \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \cos y + \left(x + \sin y\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \cos y, x + \sin y\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \cos y, x + \sin y\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 95.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(z + y \cdot \left(1 + -0.5 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+r+ 95.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + z\right) + y \cdot \left(1 + -0.5 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 95.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + z\right) + y \cdot \left(1 + -0.5 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 71.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -3.4 \cdot 10^{+21} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1.4 \cdot 10^{+28}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z + x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(z + x\right) + y \cdot \left(1 + -0.5 \cdot \left(z \cdot y\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 69.2% accurate, 13.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -6.4 \cdot 10^{+32} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 3.8 \cdot 10^{+28}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z + x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z + \left(y + x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -6.4e+32) (not (<= y 3.8e+28))) (+ z x) (+ z (+ y x))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -6.4e+32) || !(y <= 3.8e+28)) {
		tmp = z + x;
	} else {
		tmp = z + (y + x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-6.4d+32)) .or. (.not. (y <= 3.8d+28))) then
        tmp = z + x
    else
        tmp = z + (y + x)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -6.4e+32) || !(y <= 3.8e+28)) {
		tmp = z + x;
	} else {
		tmp = z + (y + x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -6.4e+32) or not (y <= 3.8e+28):
		tmp = z + x
	else:
		tmp = z + (y + x)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -6.4e+32) || !(y <= 3.8e+28))
		tmp = Float64(z + x);
	else
		tmp = Float64(z + Float64(y + x));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -6.4e+32) || ~((y <= 3.8e+28)))
		tmp = z + x;
	else
		tmp = z + (y + x);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -6.4e+32], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 3.8e+28]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(z + x), $MachinePrecision], N[(z + N[(y + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -6.3999999999999998e32 or 3.7999999999999999e28 < y

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(x + \sin y\right) + z \cdot \cos y \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \cos y + \left(x + \sin y\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \cos y, x + \sin y\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \cos y, x + \sin y\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 43.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + z} \]

   if -6.3999999999999998e32 < y < 3.7999999999999999e28

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + \sin y\right) + z \cdot \cos y \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \cos y + \left(x + \sin y\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \cos y, x + \sin y\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \cos y, x + \sin y\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 94.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(y + z\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+r+ 94.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right) + z} \]

      2. +-commutative 94.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)} + z \]

   7. Simplified 94.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + x\right) + z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 71.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -6.4 \cdot 10^{+32} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 3.8 \cdot 10^{+28}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z + x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z + \left(y + x\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 55.0% accurate, 18.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -520000000000:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 5 \cdot 10^{-5}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -520000000000.0) x (if (<= x 5e-5) z x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -520000000000.0) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (x <= 5e-5) {
		tmp = z;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-520000000000.0d0)) then
        tmp = x
    else if (x <= 5d-5) then
        tmp = z
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -520000000000.0) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (x <= 5e-5) {
		tmp = z;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -520000000000.0:
		tmp = x
	elif x <= 5e-5:
		tmp = z
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -520000000000.0)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (x <= 5e-5)
		tmp = z;
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -520000000000.0)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (x <= 5e-5)
		tmp = z;
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[x, -520000000000.0], x, If[LessEqual[x, 5e-5], z, x]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -5.2e11 or 5.00000000000000024e-5 < x

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + \sin y\right) + z \cdot \cos y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. expm1-log1p-u 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + \sin y\right) + z \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\cos y\right)\right)} \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(x + \sin y\right) + z \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\cos y\right)\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 75.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if -5.2e11 < x < 5.00000000000000024e-5

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(x + \sin y\right) + z \cdot \cos y \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \cos y + \left(x + \sin y\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \cos y, x + \sin y\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \cos y, x + \sin y\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 62.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \cos y} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around 0 40.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 65.3% accurate, 69.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ z + x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ z x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z + x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = z + x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z + x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return z + x

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(z + x)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = z + x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(z + x), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(x + \sin y\right) + z \cdot \cos y \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \cos y + \left(x + \sin y\right)} \]

   2. fma-define 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \cos y, x + \sin y\right)} \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \cos y, x + \sin y\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 68.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + z} \]

6. Final simplification 68.0%

   \[\leadsto z + x \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 40.8% accurate, 207.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(x + \sin y\right) + z \cdot \cos y \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. expm1-log1p-u 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(x + \sin y\right) + z \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\cos y\right)\right)} \]

4. Applied egg-rr 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \left(x + \sin y\right) + z \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\cos y\right)\right)} \]

5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 44.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024137 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Graphics.Rasterific.Svg.PathConverter:segmentToBezier from rasterific-svg-0.2.3.1, C"
  :precision binary64
  (+ (+ x (sin y)) (* z (cos y))))