Graphics.Rendering.Plot.Render.Plot.Legend:renderLegendOutside from plot-0.2.3.4, B

Percentage Accurate: 99.8% → 99.9%
Time: 8.2s
Alternatives: 14
Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

?
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (* x (+ (+ (+ (+ y z) z) y) t)) (* y 5.0)))
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x * ((((y + z) + z) + y) + t)) + (y * 5.0);
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (x * ((((y + z) + z) + y) + t)) + (y * 5.0d0)
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x * ((((y + z) + z) + y) + t)) + (y * 5.0);
}
def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (x * ((((y + z) + z) + y) + t)) + (y * 5.0)
function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(x * Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(y + z) + z) + y) + t)) + Float64(y * 5.0))
end
function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (x * ((((y + z) + z) + y) + t)) + (y * 5.0);
end
code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(x * N[(N[(N[(N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision] + y), $MachinePrecision] + t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * 5.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5
\end{array}

Sampling outcomes in binary64 precision:

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 14 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (* x (+ (+ (+ (+ y z) z) y) t)) (* y 5.0)))
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x * ((((y + z) + z) + y) + t)) + (y * 5.0);
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (x * ((((y + z) + z) + y) + t)) + (y * 5.0d0)
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x * ((((y + z) + z) + y) + t)) + (y * 5.0);
}
def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (x * ((((y + z) + z) + y) + t)) + (y * 5.0)
function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(x * Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(y + z) + z) + y) + t)) + Float64(y * 5.0))
end
function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (x * ((((y + z) + z) + y) + t)) + (y * 5.0);
end
code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(x * N[(N[(N[(N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision] + y), $MachinePrecision] + t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * 5.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 99.9% accurate, 0.1× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, x \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(y + z, 2, t\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (fma y 5.0 (* x (fma (+ y z) 2.0 t))))
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return fma(y, 5.0, (x * fma((y + z), 2.0, t)));
}
function code(x, y, z, t)
	return fma(y, 5.0, Float64(x * fma(Float64(y + z), 2.0, t)))
end
code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(y * 5.0 + N[(x * N[(N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision] * 2.0 + t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, x \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(y + z, 2, t\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.5%

    \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
  2. Add Preprocessing
  3. Step-by-step derivation
    1. +-commutative99.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 5 + x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right)} \]
    2. fma-define100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right)\right)} \]
    3. flip-+59.2%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, x \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) \cdot \left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t \cdot t}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}}\right) \]
    4. associate-*r/54.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \color{blue}{\frac{x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) \cdot \left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t \cdot t\right)}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}}\right) \]
    5. fma-neg57.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y, \left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y, -t \cdot t\right)}}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}\right) \]
    6. associate-+l+57.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\left(y + z\right) + \left(z + y\right)}, \left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y, -t \cdot t\right)}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}\right) \]
    7. +-commutative57.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(\left(y + z\right) + \color{blue}{\left(y + z\right)}, \left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y, -t \cdot t\right)}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}\right) \]
    8. count-257.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)}, \left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y, -t \cdot t\right)}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}\right) \]
    9. associate-+l+57.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right), \color{blue}{\left(y + z\right) + \left(z + y\right)}, -t \cdot t\right)}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}\right) \]
    10. +-commutative57.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right), \left(y + z\right) + \color{blue}{\left(y + z\right)}, -t \cdot t\right)}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}\right) \]
    11. count-257.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right), \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)}, -t \cdot t\right)}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}\right) \]
    12. fma-neg54.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) \cdot \left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) - t \cdot t\right)}}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}\right) \]
    13. associate-+l+54.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \left(\left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) \cdot \left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) - t \cdot t\right)}{\color{blue}{\left(\left(y + z\right) + \left(z + y\right)\right)} - t}\right) \]
    14. +-commutative54.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \left(\left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) \cdot \left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) - t \cdot t\right)}{\left(\left(y + z\right) + \color{blue}{\left(y + z\right)}\right) - t}\right) \]
    15. count-254.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \left(\left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) \cdot \left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) - t \cdot t\right)}{\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)} - t}\right) \]
  4. Applied egg-rr100.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, x \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(y + z, 2, t\right)\right)} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 99.8% accurate, 0.1× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(x, t + \left(y + z\right) \cdot 2, y \cdot 5\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (fma x (+ t (* (+ y z) 2.0)) (* y 5.0)))
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return fma(x, (t + ((y + z) * 2.0)), (y * 5.0));
}
function code(x, y, z, t)
	return fma(x, Float64(t + Float64(Float64(y + z) * 2.0)), Float64(y * 5.0))
end
code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x * N[(t + N[(N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision] * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * 5.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\mathsf{fma}\left(x, t + \left(y + z\right) \cdot 2, y \cdot 5\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.5%

    \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. fma-define99.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t, y \cdot 5\right)} \]
    2. associate-+l+99.5%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{\left(\left(y + z\right) + \left(z + y\right)\right)} + t, y \cdot 5\right) \]
    3. +-commutative99.5%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \left(\left(y + z\right) + \color{blue}{\left(y + z\right)}\right) + t, y \cdot 5\right) \]
    4. count-299.5%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)} + t, y \cdot 5\right) \]
  3. Simplified99.5%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2 \cdot \left(y + z\right) + t, y \cdot 5\right)} \]
  4. Add Preprocessing
  5. Final simplification99.5%

    \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, t + \left(y + z\right) \cdot 2, y \cdot 5\right) \]
  6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 95.5% accurate, 0.6× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -2.2 \cdot 10^{+161} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1.96 \cdot 10^{+96}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(5 + 2 \cdot \left(x + x \cdot \frac{z}{y}\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(t + \left(\left(y + z\right) \cdot 2 + 5 \cdot \frac{y}{x}\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -2.2e+161) (not (<= y 1.96e+96)))
   (* y (+ 5.0 (* 2.0 (+ x (* x (/ z y))))))
   (* x (+ t (+ (* (+ y z) 2.0) (* 5.0 (/ y x)))))))
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -2.2e+161) || !(y <= 1.96e+96)) {
		tmp = y * (5.0 + (2.0 * (x + (x * (z / y)))));
	} else {
		tmp = x * (t + (((y + z) * 2.0) + (5.0 * (y / x))));
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-2.2d+161)) .or. (.not. (y <= 1.96d+96))) then
        tmp = y * (5.0d0 + (2.0d0 * (x + (x * (z / y)))))
    else
        tmp = x * (t + (((y + z) * 2.0d0) + (5.0d0 * (y / x))))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -2.2e+161) || !(y <= 1.96e+96)) {
		tmp = y * (5.0 + (2.0 * (x + (x * (z / y)))));
	} else {
		tmp = x * (t + (((y + z) * 2.0) + (5.0 * (y / x))));
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -2.2e+161) or not (y <= 1.96e+96):
		tmp = y * (5.0 + (2.0 * (x + (x * (z / y)))))
	else:
		tmp = x * (t + (((y + z) * 2.0) + (5.0 * (y / x))))
	return tmp
function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -2.2e+161) || !(y <= 1.96e+96))
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(5.0 + Float64(2.0 * Float64(x + Float64(x * Float64(z / y))))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(t + Float64(Float64(Float64(y + z) * 2.0) + Float64(5.0 * Float64(y / x)))));
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -2.2e+161) || ~((y <= 1.96e+96)))
		tmp = y * (5.0 + (2.0 * (x + (x * (z / y)))));
	else
		tmp = x * (t + (((y + z) * 2.0) + (5.0 * (y / x))));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -2.2e+161], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 1.96e+96]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * N[(5.0 + N[(2.0 * N[(x + N[(x * N[(z / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * N[(t + N[(N[(N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision] * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(5.0 * N[(y / x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;y \leq -2.2 \cdot 10^{+161} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1.96 \cdot 10^{+96}\right):\\
\;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(5 + 2 \cdot \left(x + x \cdot \frac{z}{y}\right)\right)\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(t + \left(\left(y + z\right) \cdot 2 + 5 \cdot \frac{y}{x}\right)\right)\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if y < -2.2e161 or 1.96e96 < y

    1. Initial program 98.5%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. fma-define98.5%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t, y \cdot 5\right)} \]
      2. associate-+l+98.5%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{\left(\left(y + z\right) + \left(z + y\right)\right)} + t, y \cdot 5\right) \]
      3. +-commutative98.5%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \left(\left(y + z\right) + \color{blue}{\left(y + z\right)}\right) + t, y \cdot 5\right) \]
      4. count-298.5%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)} + t, y \cdot 5\right) \]
    3. Simplified98.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2 \cdot \left(y + z\right) + t, y \cdot 5\right)} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Taylor expanded in t around 0 96.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) + 5 \cdot y} \]
    6. Taylor expanded in y around inf 93.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(5 + \left(2 \cdot x + 2 \cdot \frac{x \cdot z}{y}\right)\right)} \]
    7. Step-by-step derivation
      1. distribute-lft-out93.3%

        \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(5 + \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + \frac{x \cdot z}{y}\right)}\right) \]
      2. associate-/l*97.3%

        \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(5 + 2 \cdot \left(x + \color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{z}{y}}\right)\right) \]
    8. Simplified97.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(5 + 2 \cdot \left(x + x \cdot \frac{z}{y}\right)\right)} \]

    if -2.2e161 < y < 1.96e96

    1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. fma-define99.9%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t, y \cdot 5\right)} \]
      2. associate-+l+99.9%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{\left(\left(y + z\right) + \left(z + y\right)\right)} + t, y \cdot 5\right) \]
      3. +-commutative99.9%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \left(\left(y + z\right) + \color{blue}{\left(y + z\right)}\right) + t, y \cdot 5\right) \]
      4. count-299.9%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)} + t, y \cdot 5\right) \]
    3. Simplified99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2 \cdot \left(y + z\right) + t, y \cdot 5\right)} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 97.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(t + \left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right) + 5 \cdot \frac{y}{x}\right)\right)} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification97.3%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -2.2 \cdot 10^{+161} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1.96 \cdot 10^{+96}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(5 + 2 \cdot \left(x + x \cdot \frac{z}{y}\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(t + \left(\left(y + z\right) \cdot 2 + 5 \cdot \frac{y}{x}\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 88.6% accurate, 0.7× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -4.4 \cdot 10^{-31} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 4.8 \cdot 10^{-46}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(t + \left(y + z\right) \cdot 2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 5 + 2 \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -4.4e-31) (not (<= x 4.8e-46)))
   (* x (+ t (* (+ y z) 2.0)))
   (+ (* y 5.0) (* 2.0 (* x (+ y z))))))
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -4.4e-31) || !(x <= 4.8e-46)) {
		tmp = x * (t + ((y + z) * 2.0));
	} else {
		tmp = (y * 5.0) + (2.0 * (x * (y + z)));
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-4.4d-31)) .or. (.not. (x <= 4.8d-46))) then
        tmp = x * (t + ((y + z) * 2.0d0))
    else
        tmp = (y * 5.0d0) + (2.0d0 * (x * (y + z)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -4.4e-31) || !(x <= 4.8e-46)) {
		tmp = x * (t + ((y + z) * 2.0));
	} else {
		tmp = (y * 5.0) + (2.0 * (x * (y + z)));
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -4.4e-31) or not (x <= 4.8e-46):
		tmp = x * (t + ((y + z) * 2.0))
	else:
		tmp = (y * 5.0) + (2.0 * (x * (y + z)))
	return tmp
function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -4.4e-31) || !(x <= 4.8e-46))
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(t + Float64(Float64(y + z) * 2.0)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(y * 5.0) + Float64(2.0 * Float64(x * Float64(y + z))));
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -4.4e-31) || ~((x <= 4.8e-46)))
		tmp = x * (t + ((y + z) * 2.0));
	else
		tmp = (y * 5.0) + (2.0 * (x * (y + z)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -4.4e-31], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 4.8e-46]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[(t + N[(N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision] * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(y * 5.0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(2.0 * N[(x * N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;x \leq -4.4 \cdot 10^{-31} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 4.8 \cdot 10^{-46}\right):\\
\;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(t + \left(y + z\right) \cdot 2\right)\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;y \cdot 5 + 2 \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right)\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if x < -4.40000000000000019e-31 or 4.80000000000000027e-46 < x

    1. Initial program 99.3%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. fma-define99.3%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t, y \cdot 5\right)} \]
      2. associate-+l+99.3%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{\left(\left(y + z\right) + \left(z + y\right)\right)} + t, y \cdot 5\right) \]
      3. +-commutative99.3%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \left(\left(y + z\right) + \color{blue}{\left(y + z\right)}\right) + t, y \cdot 5\right) \]
      4. count-299.3%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)} + t, y \cdot 5\right) \]
    3. Simplified99.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2 \cdot \left(y + z\right) + t, y \cdot 5\right)} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 96.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(t + 2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right)} \]

    if -4.40000000000000019e-31 < x < 4.80000000000000027e-46

    1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. fma-define99.8%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t, y \cdot 5\right)} \]
      2. associate-+l+99.8%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{\left(\left(y + z\right) + \left(z + y\right)\right)} + t, y \cdot 5\right) \]
      3. +-commutative99.8%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \left(\left(y + z\right) + \color{blue}{\left(y + z\right)}\right) + t, y \cdot 5\right) \]
      4. count-299.8%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)} + t, y \cdot 5\right) \]
    3. Simplified99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2 \cdot \left(y + z\right) + t, y \cdot 5\right)} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Taylor expanded in t around 0 88.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) + 5 \cdot y} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification93.7%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -4.4 \cdot 10^{-31} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 4.8 \cdot 10^{-46}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(t + \left(y + z\right) \cdot 2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 5 + 2 \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 95.6% accurate, 0.7× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq 1.05 \cdot 10^{+109}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(t + z \cdot 2\right) + y \cdot \left(5 + x \cdot 2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 5 + x \cdot \left(t + y \cdot 2\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= t 1.05e+109)
   (+ (* x (+ t (* z 2.0))) (* y (+ 5.0 (* x 2.0))))
   (+ (* y 5.0) (* x (+ t (* y 2.0))))))
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (t <= 1.05e+109) {
		tmp = (x * (t + (z * 2.0))) + (y * (5.0 + (x * 2.0)));
	} else {
		tmp = (y * 5.0) + (x * (t + (y * 2.0)));
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (t <= 1.05d+109) then
        tmp = (x * (t + (z * 2.0d0))) + (y * (5.0d0 + (x * 2.0d0)))
    else
        tmp = (y * 5.0d0) + (x * (t + (y * 2.0d0)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (t <= 1.05e+109) {
		tmp = (x * (t + (z * 2.0))) + (y * (5.0 + (x * 2.0)));
	} else {
		tmp = (y * 5.0) + (x * (t + (y * 2.0)));
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if t <= 1.05e+109:
		tmp = (x * (t + (z * 2.0))) + (y * (5.0 + (x * 2.0)))
	else:
		tmp = (y * 5.0) + (x * (t + (y * 2.0)))
	return tmp
function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t <= 1.05e+109)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * Float64(t + Float64(z * 2.0))) + Float64(y * Float64(5.0 + Float64(x * 2.0))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(y * 5.0) + Float64(x * Float64(t + Float64(y * 2.0))));
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t <= 1.05e+109)
		tmp = (x * (t + (z * 2.0))) + (y * (5.0 + (x * 2.0)));
	else
		tmp = (y * 5.0) + (x * (t + (y * 2.0)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[t, 1.05e+109], N[(N[(x * N[(t + N[(z * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * N[(5.0 + N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(y * 5.0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * N[(t + N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;t \leq 1.05 \cdot 10^{+109}:\\
\;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(t + z \cdot 2\right) + y \cdot \left(5 + x \cdot 2\right)\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;y \cdot 5 + x \cdot \left(t + y \cdot 2\right)\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if t < 1.0500000000000001e109

    1. Initial program 99.4%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. fma-define99.4%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t, y \cdot 5\right)} \]
      2. associate-+l+99.4%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{\left(\left(y + z\right) + \left(z + y\right)\right)} + t, y \cdot 5\right) \]
      3. +-commutative99.4%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \left(\left(y + z\right) + \color{blue}{\left(y + z\right)}\right) + t, y \cdot 5\right) \]
      4. count-299.4%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)} + t, y \cdot 5\right) \]
    3. Simplified99.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2 \cdot \left(y + z\right) + t, y \cdot 5\right)} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 98.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(t + 2 \cdot z\right) + y \cdot \left(5 + 2 \cdot x\right)} \]

    if 1.0500000000000001e109 < t

    1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot y} + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification98.4%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq 1.05 \cdot 10^{+109}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(t + z \cdot 2\right) + y \cdot \left(5 + x \cdot 2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 5 + x \cdot \left(t + y \cdot 2\right)\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 88.6% accurate, 0.8× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -3.5 \cdot 10^{-31} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1.1 \cdot 10^{-45}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(t + \left(y + z\right) \cdot 2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 5 + 2 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -3.5e-31) (not (<= x 1.1e-45)))
   (* x (+ t (* (+ y z) 2.0)))
   (+ (* y 5.0) (* 2.0 (* x z)))))
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -3.5e-31) || !(x <= 1.1e-45)) {
		tmp = x * (t + ((y + z) * 2.0));
	} else {
		tmp = (y * 5.0) + (2.0 * (x * z));
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-3.5d-31)) .or. (.not. (x <= 1.1d-45))) then
        tmp = x * (t + ((y + z) * 2.0d0))
    else
        tmp = (y * 5.0d0) + (2.0d0 * (x * z))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -3.5e-31) || !(x <= 1.1e-45)) {
		tmp = x * (t + ((y + z) * 2.0));
	} else {
		tmp = (y * 5.0) + (2.0 * (x * z));
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -3.5e-31) or not (x <= 1.1e-45):
		tmp = x * (t + ((y + z) * 2.0))
	else:
		tmp = (y * 5.0) + (2.0 * (x * z))
	return tmp
function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -3.5e-31) || !(x <= 1.1e-45))
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(t + Float64(Float64(y + z) * 2.0)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(y * 5.0) + Float64(2.0 * Float64(x * z)));
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -3.5e-31) || ~((x <= 1.1e-45)))
		tmp = x * (t + ((y + z) * 2.0));
	else
		tmp = (y * 5.0) + (2.0 * (x * z));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -3.5e-31], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 1.1e-45]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[(t + N[(N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision] * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(y * 5.0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(2.0 * N[(x * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;x \leq -3.5 \cdot 10^{-31} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1.1 \cdot 10^{-45}\right):\\
\;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(t + \left(y + z\right) \cdot 2\right)\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;y \cdot 5 + 2 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right)\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if x < -3.49999999999999985e-31 or 1.09999999999999997e-45 < x

    1. Initial program 99.3%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. fma-define99.3%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t, y \cdot 5\right)} \]
      2. associate-+l+99.3%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{\left(\left(y + z\right) + \left(z + y\right)\right)} + t, y \cdot 5\right) \]
      3. +-commutative99.3%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \left(\left(y + z\right) + \color{blue}{\left(y + z\right)}\right) + t, y \cdot 5\right) \]
      4. count-299.3%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)} + t, y \cdot 5\right) \]
    3. Simplified99.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2 \cdot \left(y + z\right) + t, y \cdot 5\right)} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 96.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(t + 2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right)} \]

    if -3.49999999999999985e-31 < x < 1.09999999999999997e-45

    1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 88.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right)} + y \cdot 5 \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification93.7%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -3.5 \cdot 10^{-31} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1.1 \cdot 10^{-45}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(t + \left(y + z\right) \cdot 2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 5 + 2 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right)\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 88.0% accurate, 0.8× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.5 \cdot 10^{-63} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 5.5 \cdot 10^{-46}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(t + \left(y + z\right) \cdot 2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 5 + x \cdot t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -1.5e-63) (not (<= x 5.5e-46)))
   (* x (+ t (* (+ y z) 2.0)))
   (+ (* y 5.0) (* x t))))
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.5e-63) || !(x <= 5.5e-46)) {
		tmp = x * (t + ((y + z) * 2.0));
	} else {
		tmp = (y * 5.0) + (x * t);
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-1.5d-63)) .or. (.not. (x <= 5.5d-46))) then
        tmp = x * (t + ((y + z) * 2.0d0))
    else
        tmp = (y * 5.0d0) + (x * t)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.5e-63) || !(x <= 5.5e-46)) {
		tmp = x * (t + ((y + z) * 2.0));
	} else {
		tmp = (y * 5.0) + (x * t);
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -1.5e-63) or not (x <= 5.5e-46):
		tmp = x * (t + ((y + z) * 2.0))
	else:
		tmp = (y * 5.0) + (x * t)
	return tmp
function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -1.5e-63) || !(x <= 5.5e-46))
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(t + Float64(Float64(y + z) * 2.0)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(y * 5.0) + Float64(x * t));
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -1.5e-63) || ~((x <= 5.5e-46)))
		tmp = x * (t + ((y + z) * 2.0));
	else
		tmp = (y * 5.0) + (x * t);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -1.5e-63], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 5.5e-46]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[(t + N[(N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision] * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(y * 5.0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.5 \cdot 10^{-63} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 5.5 \cdot 10^{-46}\right):\\
\;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(t + \left(y + z\right) \cdot 2\right)\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;y \cdot 5 + x \cdot t\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if x < -1.4999999999999999e-63 or 5.49999999999999983e-46 < x

    1. Initial program 99.3%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. fma-define99.3%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t, y \cdot 5\right)} \]
      2. associate-+l+99.3%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{\left(\left(y + z\right) + \left(z + y\right)\right)} + t, y \cdot 5\right) \]
      3. +-commutative99.3%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \left(\left(y + z\right) + \color{blue}{\left(y + z\right)}\right) + t, y \cdot 5\right) \]
      4. count-299.3%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)} + t, y \cdot 5\right) \]
    3. Simplified99.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2 \cdot \left(y + z\right) + t, y \cdot 5\right)} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 95.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(t + 2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right)} \]

    if -1.4999999999999999e-63 < x < 5.49999999999999983e-46

    1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in t around inf 84.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot x} + y \cdot 5 \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification91.6%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.5 \cdot 10^{-63} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 5.5 \cdot 10^{-46}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(t + \left(y + z\right) \cdot 2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 5 + x \cdot t\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 47.3% accurate, 0.8× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -5.2 \cdot 10^{+168}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -4 \cdot 10^{-37} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 6 \cdot 10^{-46}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 5\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -5.2e+168)
   (* x (* z 2.0))
   (if (or (<= x -4e-37) (not (<= x 6e-46))) (* x t) (* y 5.0))))
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -5.2e+168) {
		tmp = x * (z * 2.0);
	} else if ((x <= -4e-37) || !(x <= 6e-46)) {
		tmp = x * t;
	} else {
		tmp = y * 5.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-5.2d+168)) then
        tmp = x * (z * 2.0d0)
    else if ((x <= (-4d-37)) .or. (.not. (x <= 6d-46))) then
        tmp = x * t
    else
        tmp = y * 5.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -5.2e+168) {
		tmp = x * (z * 2.0);
	} else if ((x <= -4e-37) || !(x <= 6e-46)) {
		tmp = x * t;
	} else {
		tmp = y * 5.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -5.2e+168:
		tmp = x * (z * 2.0)
	elif (x <= -4e-37) or not (x <= 6e-46):
		tmp = x * t
	else:
		tmp = y * 5.0
	return tmp
function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -5.2e+168)
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(z * 2.0));
	elseif ((x <= -4e-37) || !(x <= 6e-46))
		tmp = Float64(x * t);
	else
		tmp = Float64(y * 5.0);
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -5.2e+168)
		tmp = x * (z * 2.0);
	elseif ((x <= -4e-37) || ~((x <= 6e-46)))
		tmp = x * t;
	else
		tmp = y * 5.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[x, -5.2e+168], N[(x * N[(z * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[Or[LessEqual[x, -4e-37], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 6e-46]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * t), $MachinePrecision], N[(y * 5.0), $MachinePrecision]]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;x \leq -5.2 \cdot 10^{+168}:\\
\;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)\\

\mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -4 \cdot 10^{-37} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 6 \cdot 10^{-46}\right):\\
\;\;\;\;x \cdot t\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;y \cdot 5\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 3 regimes
  2. if x < -5.2e168

    1. Initial program 97.3%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative97.3%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 5 + x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right)} \]
      2. fma-define100.0%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right)\right)} \]
      3. flip-+78.3%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, x \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) \cdot \left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t \cdot t}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}}\right) \]
      4. associate-*r/73.4%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \color{blue}{\frac{x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) \cdot \left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t \cdot t\right)}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}}\right) \]
      5. fma-neg86.9%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y, \left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y, -t \cdot t\right)}}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}\right) \]
      6. associate-+l+86.9%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\left(y + z\right) + \left(z + y\right)}, \left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y, -t \cdot t\right)}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}\right) \]
      7. +-commutative86.9%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(\left(y + z\right) + \color{blue}{\left(y + z\right)}, \left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y, -t \cdot t\right)}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}\right) \]
      8. count-286.9%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)}, \left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y, -t \cdot t\right)}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}\right) \]
      9. associate-+l+86.9%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right), \color{blue}{\left(y + z\right) + \left(z + y\right)}, -t \cdot t\right)}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}\right) \]
      10. +-commutative86.9%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right), \left(y + z\right) + \color{blue}{\left(y + z\right)}, -t \cdot t\right)}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}\right) \]
      11. count-286.9%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right), \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)}, -t \cdot t\right)}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}\right) \]
      12. fma-neg73.4%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) \cdot \left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) - t \cdot t\right)}}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}\right) \]
      13. associate-+l+73.4%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \left(\left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) \cdot \left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) - t \cdot t\right)}{\color{blue}{\left(\left(y + z\right) + \left(z + y\right)\right)} - t}\right) \]
      14. +-commutative73.4%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \left(\left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) \cdot \left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) - t \cdot t\right)}{\left(\left(y + z\right) + \color{blue}{\left(y + z\right)}\right) - t}\right) \]
      15. count-273.4%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \left(\left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) \cdot \left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) - t \cdot t\right)}{\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)} - t}\right) \]
    4. Applied egg-rr100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, x \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(y + z, 2, t\right)\right)} \]
    5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 56.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right)} \]
    6. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-*r*56.4%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot x\right) \cdot z} \]
      2. *-commutative56.4%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2\right)} \cdot z \]
      3. associate-*r*56.4%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right)} \]
    7. Simplified56.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right)} \]

    if -5.2e168 < x < -4.00000000000000027e-37 or 5.99999999999999975e-46 < x

    1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative100.0%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 5 + x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right)} \]
      2. fma-define100.0%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right)\right)} \]
      3. flip-+68.0%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, x \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) \cdot \left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t \cdot t}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}}\right) \]
      4. associate-*r/59.4%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \color{blue}{\frac{x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) \cdot \left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t \cdot t\right)}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}}\right) \]
      5. fma-neg63.0%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y, \left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y, -t \cdot t\right)}}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}\right) \]
      6. associate-+l+63.0%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\left(y + z\right) + \left(z + y\right)}, \left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y, -t \cdot t\right)}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}\right) \]
      7. +-commutative63.0%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(\left(y + z\right) + \color{blue}{\left(y + z\right)}, \left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y, -t \cdot t\right)}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}\right) \]
      8. count-263.0%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)}, \left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y, -t \cdot t\right)}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}\right) \]
      9. associate-+l+63.0%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right), \color{blue}{\left(y + z\right) + \left(z + y\right)}, -t \cdot t\right)}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}\right) \]
      10. +-commutative63.0%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right), \left(y + z\right) + \color{blue}{\left(y + z\right)}, -t \cdot t\right)}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}\right) \]
      11. count-263.0%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right), \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)}, -t \cdot t\right)}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}\right) \]
      12. fma-neg59.4%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) \cdot \left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) - t \cdot t\right)}}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}\right) \]
      13. associate-+l+59.4%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \left(\left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) \cdot \left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) - t \cdot t\right)}{\color{blue}{\left(\left(y + z\right) + \left(z + y\right)\right)} - t}\right) \]
      14. +-commutative59.4%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \left(\left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) \cdot \left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) - t \cdot t\right)}{\left(\left(y + z\right) + \color{blue}{\left(y + z\right)}\right) - t}\right) \]
      15. count-259.4%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \left(\left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) \cdot \left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) - t \cdot t\right)}{\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)} - t}\right) \]
    4. Applied egg-rr100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, x \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(y + z, 2, t\right)\right)} \]
    5. Taylor expanded in t around inf 46.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot x} \]
    6. Step-by-step derivation
      1. *-commutative46.3%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot t} \]
    7. Simplified46.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot t} \]

    if -4.00000000000000027e-37 < x < 5.99999999999999975e-46

    1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative99.8%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 5 + x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right)} \]
      2. fma-define100.0%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right)\right)} \]
      3. flip-+41.6%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, x \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) \cdot \left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t \cdot t}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}}\right) \]
      4. associate-*r/40.5%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \color{blue}{\frac{x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) \cdot \left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t \cdot t\right)}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}}\right) \]
      5. fma-neg40.9%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y, \left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y, -t \cdot t\right)}}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}\right) \]
      6. associate-+l+40.9%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\left(y + z\right) + \left(z + y\right)}, \left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y, -t \cdot t\right)}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}\right) \]
      7. +-commutative40.9%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(\left(y + z\right) + \color{blue}{\left(y + z\right)}, \left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y, -t \cdot t\right)}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}\right) \]
      8. count-240.9%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)}, \left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y, -t \cdot t\right)}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}\right) \]
      9. associate-+l+40.9%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right), \color{blue}{\left(y + z\right) + \left(z + y\right)}, -t \cdot t\right)}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}\right) \]
      10. +-commutative40.9%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right), \left(y + z\right) + \color{blue}{\left(y + z\right)}, -t \cdot t\right)}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}\right) \]
      11. count-240.9%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right), \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)}, -t \cdot t\right)}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}\right) \]
      12. fma-neg40.5%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) \cdot \left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) - t \cdot t\right)}}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}\right) \]
      13. associate-+l+40.5%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \left(\left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) \cdot \left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) - t \cdot t\right)}{\color{blue}{\left(\left(y + z\right) + \left(z + y\right)\right)} - t}\right) \]
      14. +-commutative40.5%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \left(\left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) \cdot \left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) - t \cdot t\right)}{\left(\left(y + z\right) + \color{blue}{\left(y + z\right)}\right) - t}\right) \]
      15. count-240.5%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \left(\left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) \cdot \left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) - t \cdot t\right)}{\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)} - t}\right) \]
    4. Applied egg-rr100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, x \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(y + z, 2, t\right)\right)} \]
    5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 71.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{5 \cdot y} \]
    6. Step-by-step derivation
      1. *-commutative71.5%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 5} \]
    7. Simplified71.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 5} \]
  3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification57.6%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -5.2 \cdot 10^{+168}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -4 \cdot 10^{-37} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 6 \cdot 10^{-46}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 5\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 79.4% accurate, 0.9× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -3.1 \cdot 10^{+39} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 5.5 \cdot 10^{+32}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(5 + x \cdot 2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(t + z \cdot 2\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -3.1e+39) (not (<= y 5.5e+32)))
   (* y (+ 5.0 (* x 2.0)))
   (* x (+ t (* z 2.0)))))
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -3.1e+39) || !(y <= 5.5e+32)) {
		tmp = y * (5.0 + (x * 2.0));
	} else {
		tmp = x * (t + (z * 2.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-3.1d+39)) .or. (.not. (y <= 5.5d+32))) then
        tmp = y * (5.0d0 + (x * 2.0d0))
    else
        tmp = x * (t + (z * 2.0d0))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -3.1e+39) || !(y <= 5.5e+32)) {
		tmp = y * (5.0 + (x * 2.0));
	} else {
		tmp = x * (t + (z * 2.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -3.1e+39) or not (y <= 5.5e+32):
		tmp = y * (5.0 + (x * 2.0))
	else:
		tmp = x * (t + (z * 2.0))
	return tmp
function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -3.1e+39) || !(y <= 5.5e+32))
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(5.0 + Float64(x * 2.0)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(t + Float64(z * 2.0)));
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -3.1e+39) || ~((y <= 5.5e+32)))
		tmp = y * (5.0 + (x * 2.0));
	else
		tmp = x * (t + (z * 2.0));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -3.1e+39], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 5.5e+32]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * N[(5.0 + N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * N[(t + N[(z * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;y \leq -3.1 \cdot 10^{+39} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 5.5 \cdot 10^{+32}\right):\\
\;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(5 + x \cdot 2\right)\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(t + z \cdot 2\right)\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if y < -3.1000000000000003e39 or 5.49999999999999984e32 < y

    1. Initial program 99.1%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. fma-define99.1%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t, y \cdot 5\right)} \]
      2. associate-+l+99.1%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{\left(\left(y + z\right) + \left(z + y\right)\right)} + t, y \cdot 5\right) \]
      3. +-commutative99.1%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \left(\left(y + z\right) + \color{blue}{\left(y + z\right)}\right) + t, y \cdot 5\right) \]
      4. count-299.1%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)} + t, y \cdot 5\right) \]
    3. Simplified99.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2 \cdot \left(y + z\right) + t, y \cdot 5\right)} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 79.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(5 + 2 \cdot x\right)} \]

    if -3.1000000000000003e39 < y < 5.49999999999999984e32

    1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative99.9%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 5 + x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right)} \]
      2. fma-define100.0%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right)\right)} \]
      3. flip-+69.2%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, x \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) \cdot \left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t \cdot t}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}}\right) \]
      4. associate-*r/64.3%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \color{blue}{\frac{x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) \cdot \left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t \cdot t\right)}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}}\right) \]
      5. fma-neg67.4%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y, \left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y, -t \cdot t\right)}}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}\right) \]
      6. associate-+l+67.4%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\left(y + z\right) + \left(z + y\right)}, \left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y, -t \cdot t\right)}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}\right) \]
      7. +-commutative67.4%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(\left(y + z\right) + \color{blue}{\left(y + z\right)}, \left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y, -t \cdot t\right)}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}\right) \]
      8. count-267.4%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)}, \left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y, -t \cdot t\right)}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}\right) \]
      9. associate-+l+67.4%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right), \color{blue}{\left(y + z\right) + \left(z + y\right)}, -t \cdot t\right)}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}\right) \]
      10. +-commutative67.4%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right), \left(y + z\right) + \color{blue}{\left(y + z\right)}, -t \cdot t\right)}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}\right) \]
      11. count-267.4%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right), \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)}, -t \cdot t\right)}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}\right) \]
      12. fma-neg64.3%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) \cdot \left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) - t \cdot t\right)}}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}\right) \]
      13. associate-+l+64.3%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \left(\left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) \cdot \left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) - t \cdot t\right)}{\color{blue}{\left(\left(y + z\right) + \left(z + y\right)\right)} - t}\right) \]
      14. +-commutative64.3%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \left(\left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) \cdot \left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) - t \cdot t\right)}{\left(\left(y + z\right) + \color{blue}{\left(y + z\right)}\right) - t}\right) \]
      15. count-264.3%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \left(\left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) \cdot \left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) - t \cdot t\right)}{\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)} - t}\right) \]
    4. Applied egg-rr100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, x \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(y + z, 2, t\right)\right)} \]
    5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 81.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(t + 2 \cdot z\right)} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification80.7%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -3.1 \cdot 10^{+39} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 5.5 \cdot 10^{+32}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(5 + x \cdot 2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(t + z \cdot 2\right)\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 66.9% accurate, 0.9× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.45 \cdot 10^{-75} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1.46 \cdot 10^{-94}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(t + z \cdot 2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 5\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -1.45e-75) (not (<= x 1.46e-94)))
   (* x (+ t (* z 2.0)))
   (* y 5.0)))
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.45e-75) || !(x <= 1.46e-94)) {
		tmp = x * (t + (z * 2.0));
	} else {
		tmp = y * 5.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-1.45d-75)) .or. (.not. (x <= 1.46d-94))) then
        tmp = x * (t + (z * 2.0d0))
    else
        tmp = y * 5.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.45e-75) || !(x <= 1.46e-94)) {
		tmp = x * (t + (z * 2.0));
	} else {
		tmp = y * 5.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -1.45e-75) or not (x <= 1.46e-94):
		tmp = x * (t + (z * 2.0))
	else:
		tmp = y * 5.0
	return tmp
function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -1.45e-75) || !(x <= 1.46e-94))
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(t + Float64(z * 2.0)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(y * 5.0);
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -1.45e-75) || ~((x <= 1.46e-94)))
		tmp = x * (t + (z * 2.0));
	else
		tmp = y * 5.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -1.45e-75], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 1.46e-94]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[(t + N[(z * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(y * 5.0), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.45 \cdot 10^{-75} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1.46 \cdot 10^{-94}\right):\\
\;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(t + z \cdot 2\right)\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;y \cdot 5\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if x < -1.4500000000000001e-75 or 1.4599999999999999e-94 < x

    1. Initial program 99.4%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative99.4%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 5 + x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right)} \]
      2. fma-define100.0%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right)\right)} \]
      3. flip-+69.1%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, x \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) \cdot \left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t \cdot t}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}}\right) \]
      4. associate-*r/61.5%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \color{blue}{\frac{x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) \cdot \left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t \cdot t\right)}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}}\right) \]
      5. fma-neg66.8%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y, \left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y, -t \cdot t\right)}}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}\right) \]
      6. associate-+l+66.8%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\left(y + z\right) + \left(z + y\right)}, \left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y, -t \cdot t\right)}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}\right) \]
      7. +-commutative66.8%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(\left(y + z\right) + \color{blue}{\left(y + z\right)}, \left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y, -t \cdot t\right)}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}\right) \]
      8. count-266.8%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)}, \left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y, -t \cdot t\right)}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}\right) \]
      9. associate-+l+66.8%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right), \color{blue}{\left(y + z\right) + \left(z + y\right)}, -t \cdot t\right)}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}\right) \]
      10. +-commutative66.8%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right), \left(y + z\right) + \color{blue}{\left(y + z\right)}, -t \cdot t\right)}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}\right) \]
      11. count-266.8%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right), \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)}, -t \cdot t\right)}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}\right) \]
      12. fma-neg61.5%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) \cdot \left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) - t \cdot t\right)}}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}\right) \]
      13. associate-+l+61.5%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \left(\left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) \cdot \left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) - t \cdot t\right)}{\color{blue}{\left(\left(y + z\right) + \left(z + y\right)\right)} - t}\right) \]
      14. +-commutative61.5%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \left(\left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) \cdot \left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) - t \cdot t\right)}{\left(\left(y + z\right) + \color{blue}{\left(y + z\right)}\right) - t}\right) \]
      15. count-261.5%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \left(\left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) \cdot \left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) - t \cdot t\right)}{\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)} - t}\right) \]
    4. Applied egg-rr100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, x \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(y + z, 2, t\right)\right)} \]
    5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 74.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(t + 2 \cdot z\right)} \]

    if -1.4500000000000001e-75 < x < 1.4599999999999999e-94

    1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative99.8%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 5 + x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right)} \]
      2. fma-define100.0%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right)\right)} \]
      3. flip-+39.2%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, x \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) \cdot \left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t \cdot t}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}}\right) \]
      4. associate-*r/39.1%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \color{blue}{\frac{x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) \cdot \left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t \cdot t\right)}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}}\right) \]
      5. fma-neg39.6%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y, \left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y, -t \cdot t\right)}}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}\right) \]
      6. associate-+l+39.6%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\left(y + z\right) + \left(z + y\right)}, \left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y, -t \cdot t\right)}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}\right) \]
      7. +-commutative39.6%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(\left(y + z\right) + \color{blue}{\left(y + z\right)}, \left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y, -t \cdot t\right)}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}\right) \]
      8. count-239.6%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)}, \left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y, -t \cdot t\right)}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}\right) \]
      9. associate-+l+39.6%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right), \color{blue}{\left(y + z\right) + \left(z + y\right)}, -t \cdot t\right)}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}\right) \]
      10. +-commutative39.6%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right), \left(y + z\right) + \color{blue}{\left(y + z\right)}, -t \cdot t\right)}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}\right) \]
      11. count-239.6%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right), \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)}, -t \cdot t\right)}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}\right) \]
      12. fma-neg39.1%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) \cdot \left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) - t \cdot t\right)}}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}\right) \]
      13. associate-+l+39.1%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \left(\left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) \cdot \left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) - t \cdot t\right)}{\color{blue}{\left(\left(y + z\right) + \left(z + y\right)\right)} - t}\right) \]
      14. +-commutative39.1%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \left(\left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) \cdot \left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) - t \cdot t\right)}{\left(\left(y + z\right) + \color{blue}{\left(y + z\right)}\right) - t}\right) \]
      15. count-239.1%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \left(\left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) \cdot \left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) - t \cdot t\right)}{\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)} - t}\right) \]
    4. Applied egg-rr100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, x \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(y + z, 2, t\right)\right)} \]
    5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 75.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{5 \cdot y} \]
    6. Step-by-step derivation
      1. *-commutative75.6%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 5} \]
    7. Simplified75.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 5} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification75.0%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.45 \cdot 10^{-75} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1.46 \cdot 10^{-94}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(t + z \cdot 2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 5\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 62.6% accurate, 0.9× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -2.3 \cdot 10^{-61} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1.4 \cdot 10^{-46}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(\left(y + z\right) \cdot 2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 5\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -2.3e-61) (not (<= x 1.4e-46)))
   (* x (* (+ y z) 2.0))
   (* y 5.0)))
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -2.3e-61) || !(x <= 1.4e-46)) {
		tmp = x * ((y + z) * 2.0);
	} else {
		tmp = y * 5.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-2.3d-61)) .or. (.not. (x <= 1.4d-46))) then
        tmp = x * ((y + z) * 2.0d0)
    else
        tmp = y * 5.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -2.3e-61) || !(x <= 1.4e-46)) {
		tmp = x * ((y + z) * 2.0);
	} else {
		tmp = y * 5.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -2.3e-61) or not (x <= 1.4e-46):
		tmp = x * ((y + z) * 2.0)
	else:
		tmp = y * 5.0
	return tmp
function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -2.3e-61) || !(x <= 1.4e-46))
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(Float64(y + z) * 2.0));
	else
		tmp = Float64(y * 5.0);
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -2.3e-61) || ~((x <= 1.4e-46)))
		tmp = x * ((y + z) * 2.0);
	else
		tmp = y * 5.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -2.3e-61], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 1.4e-46]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[(N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision] * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(y * 5.0), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;x \leq -2.3 \cdot 10^{-61} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1.4 \cdot 10^{-46}\right):\\
\;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(\left(y + z\right) \cdot 2\right)\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;y \cdot 5\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if x < -2.29999999999999992e-61 or 1.3999999999999999e-46 < x

    1. Initial program 99.3%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. fma-define99.3%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t, y \cdot 5\right)} \]
      2. associate-+l+99.3%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{\left(\left(y + z\right) + \left(z + y\right)\right)} + t, y \cdot 5\right) \]
      3. +-commutative99.3%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \left(\left(y + z\right) + \color{blue}{\left(y + z\right)}\right) + t, y \cdot 5\right) \]
      4. count-299.3%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)} + t, y \cdot 5\right) \]
    3. Simplified99.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2 \cdot \left(y + z\right) + t, y \cdot 5\right)} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Taylor expanded in t around 0 64.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) + 5 \cdot y} \]
    6. Taylor expanded in y around 0 62.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot \left(5 + 2 \cdot x\right)} \]
    7. Taylor expanded in x around inf 61.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(2 \cdot y + 2 \cdot z\right)} \]
    8. Step-by-step derivation
      1. distribute-lft-out61.1%

        \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right)} \]
    9. Simplified61.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right)} \]

    if -2.29999999999999992e-61 < x < 1.3999999999999999e-46

    1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative99.8%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 5 + x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right)} \]
      2. fma-define100.0%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right)\right)} \]
      3. flip-+40.6%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, x \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) \cdot \left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t \cdot t}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}}\right) \]
      4. associate-*r/39.4%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \color{blue}{\frac{x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) \cdot \left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t \cdot t\right)}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}}\right) \]
      5. fma-neg39.8%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y, \left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y, -t \cdot t\right)}}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}\right) \]
      6. associate-+l+39.8%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\left(y + z\right) + \left(z + y\right)}, \left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y, -t \cdot t\right)}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}\right) \]
      7. +-commutative39.8%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(\left(y + z\right) + \color{blue}{\left(y + z\right)}, \left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y, -t \cdot t\right)}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}\right) \]
      8. count-239.8%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)}, \left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y, -t \cdot t\right)}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}\right) \]
      9. associate-+l+39.8%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right), \color{blue}{\left(y + z\right) + \left(z + y\right)}, -t \cdot t\right)}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}\right) \]
      10. +-commutative39.8%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right), \left(y + z\right) + \color{blue}{\left(y + z\right)}, -t \cdot t\right)}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}\right) \]
      11. count-239.8%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right), \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)}, -t \cdot t\right)}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}\right) \]
      12. fma-neg39.4%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) \cdot \left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) - t \cdot t\right)}}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}\right) \]
      13. associate-+l+39.4%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \left(\left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) \cdot \left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) - t \cdot t\right)}{\color{blue}{\left(\left(y + z\right) + \left(z + y\right)\right)} - t}\right) \]
      14. +-commutative39.4%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \left(\left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) \cdot \left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) - t \cdot t\right)}{\left(\left(y + z\right) + \color{blue}{\left(y + z\right)}\right) - t}\right) \]
      15. count-239.4%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \left(\left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) \cdot \left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) - t \cdot t\right)}{\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)} - t}\right) \]
    4. Applied egg-rr100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, x \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(y + z, 2, t\right)\right)} \]
    5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 73.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{5 \cdot y} \]
    6. Step-by-step derivation
      1. *-commutative73.0%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 5} \]
    7. Simplified73.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 5} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification65.5%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -2.3 \cdot 10^{-61} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1.4 \cdot 10^{-46}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(\left(y + z\right) \cdot 2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 5\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 12: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ y \cdot 5 + x \cdot \left(t + \left(y + \left(z + \left(y + z\right)\right)\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (* y 5.0) (* x (+ t (+ y (+ z (+ y z)))))))
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (y * 5.0) + (x * (t + (y + (z + (y + z)))));
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (y * 5.0d0) + (x * (t + (y + (z + (y + z)))))
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (y * 5.0) + (x * (t + (y + (z + (y + z)))));
}
def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (y * 5.0) + (x * (t + (y + (z + (y + z)))))
function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(y * 5.0) + Float64(x * Float64(t + Float64(y + Float64(z + Float64(y + z))))))
end
function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (y * 5.0) + (x * (t + (y + (z + (y + z)))));
end
code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(y * 5.0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * N[(t + N[(y + N[(z + N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
y \cdot 5 + x \cdot \left(t + \left(y + \left(z + \left(y + z\right)\right)\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.5%

    \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
  2. Add Preprocessing
  3. Final simplification99.5%

    \[\leadsto y \cdot 5 + x \cdot \left(t + \left(y + \left(z + \left(y + z\right)\right)\right)\right) \]
  4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 13: 47.2% accurate, 1.1× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.1 \cdot 10^{-36} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 4.2 \cdot 10^{-46}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 5\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -1.1e-36) (not (<= x 4.2e-46))) (* x t) (* y 5.0)))
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.1e-36) || !(x <= 4.2e-46)) {
		tmp = x * t;
	} else {
		tmp = y * 5.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-1.1d-36)) .or. (.not. (x <= 4.2d-46))) then
        tmp = x * t
    else
        tmp = y * 5.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.1e-36) || !(x <= 4.2e-46)) {
		tmp = x * t;
	} else {
		tmp = y * 5.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -1.1e-36) or not (x <= 4.2e-46):
		tmp = x * t
	else:
		tmp = y * 5.0
	return tmp
function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -1.1e-36) || !(x <= 4.2e-46))
		tmp = Float64(x * t);
	else
		tmp = Float64(y * 5.0);
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -1.1e-36) || ~((x <= 4.2e-46)))
		tmp = x * t;
	else
		tmp = y * 5.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -1.1e-36], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 4.2e-46]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * t), $MachinePrecision], N[(y * 5.0), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.1 \cdot 10^{-36} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 4.2 \cdot 10^{-46}\right):\\
\;\;\;\;x \cdot t\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;y \cdot 5\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if x < -1.1e-36 or 4.19999999999999975e-46 < x

    1. Initial program 99.3%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative99.3%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 5 + x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right)} \]
      2. fma-define100.0%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right)\right)} \]
      3. flip-+70.4%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, x \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) \cdot \left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t \cdot t}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}}\right) \]
      4. associate-*r/62.7%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \color{blue}{\frac{x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) \cdot \left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t \cdot t\right)}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}}\right) \]
      5. fma-neg68.6%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y, \left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y, -t \cdot t\right)}}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}\right) \]
      6. associate-+l+68.6%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\left(y + z\right) + \left(z + y\right)}, \left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y, -t \cdot t\right)}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}\right) \]
      7. +-commutative68.6%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(\left(y + z\right) + \color{blue}{\left(y + z\right)}, \left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y, -t \cdot t\right)}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}\right) \]
      8. count-268.6%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)}, \left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y, -t \cdot t\right)}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}\right) \]
      9. associate-+l+68.6%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right), \color{blue}{\left(y + z\right) + \left(z + y\right)}, -t \cdot t\right)}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}\right) \]
      10. +-commutative68.6%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right), \left(y + z\right) + \color{blue}{\left(y + z\right)}, -t \cdot t\right)}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}\right) \]
      11. count-268.6%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right), \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)}, -t \cdot t\right)}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}\right) \]
      12. fma-neg62.7%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) \cdot \left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) - t \cdot t\right)}}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}\right) \]
      13. associate-+l+62.7%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \left(\left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) \cdot \left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) - t \cdot t\right)}{\color{blue}{\left(\left(y + z\right) + \left(z + y\right)\right)} - t}\right) \]
      14. +-commutative62.7%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \left(\left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) \cdot \left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) - t \cdot t\right)}{\left(\left(y + z\right) + \color{blue}{\left(y + z\right)}\right) - t}\right) \]
      15. count-262.7%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \left(\left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) \cdot \left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) - t \cdot t\right)}{\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)} - t}\right) \]
    4. Applied egg-rr100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, x \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(y + z, 2, t\right)\right)} \]
    5. Taylor expanded in t around inf 45.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot x} \]
    6. Step-by-step derivation
      1. *-commutative45.9%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot t} \]
    7. Simplified45.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot t} \]

    if -1.1e-36 < x < 4.19999999999999975e-46

    1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative99.8%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 5 + x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right)} \]
      2. fma-define100.0%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right)\right)} \]
      3. flip-+41.6%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, x \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) \cdot \left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t \cdot t}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}}\right) \]
      4. associate-*r/40.5%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \color{blue}{\frac{x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) \cdot \left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t \cdot t\right)}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}}\right) \]
      5. fma-neg40.9%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y, \left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y, -t \cdot t\right)}}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}\right) \]
      6. associate-+l+40.9%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\left(y + z\right) + \left(z + y\right)}, \left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y, -t \cdot t\right)}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}\right) \]
      7. +-commutative40.9%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(\left(y + z\right) + \color{blue}{\left(y + z\right)}, \left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y, -t \cdot t\right)}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}\right) \]
      8. count-240.9%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)}, \left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y, -t \cdot t\right)}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}\right) \]
      9. associate-+l+40.9%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right), \color{blue}{\left(y + z\right) + \left(z + y\right)}, -t \cdot t\right)}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}\right) \]
      10. +-commutative40.9%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right), \left(y + z\right) + \color{blue}{\left(y + z\right)}, -t \cdot t\right)}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}\right) \]
      11. count-240.9%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right), \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)}, -t \cdot t\right)}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}\right) \]
      12. fma-neg40.5%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) \cdot \left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) - t \cdot t\right)}}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}\right) \]
      13. associate-+l+40.5%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \left(\left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) \cdot \left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) - t \cdot t\right)}{\color{blue}{\left(\left(y + z\right) + \left(z + y\right)\right)} - t}\right) \]
      14. +-commutative40.5%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \left(\left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) \cdot \left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) - t \cdot t\right)}{\left(\left(y + z\right) + \color{blue}{\left(y + z\right)}\right) - t}\right) \]
      15. count-240.5%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \left(\left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) \cdot \left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) - t \cdot t\right)}{\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)} - t}\right) \]
    4. Applied egg-rr100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, x \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(y + z, 2, t\right)\right)} \]
    5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 71.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{5 \cdot y} \]
    6. Step-by-step derivation
      1. *-commutative71.5%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 5} \]
    7. Simplified71.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 5} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification55.9%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.1 \cdot 10^{-36} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 4.2 \cdot 10^{-46}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 5\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 14: 30.8% accurate, 5.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot t \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (* x t))
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x * t;
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x * t
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x * t;
}
def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x * t
function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x * t)
end
function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x * t;
end
code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x * t), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
x \cdot t
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.5%

    \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
  2. Add Preprocessing
  3. Step-by-step derivation
    1. +-commutative99.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 5 + x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right)} \]
    2. fma-define100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right)\right)} \]
    3. flip-+59.2%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, x \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) \cdot \left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t \cdot t}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}}\right) \]
    4. associate-*r/54.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \color{blue}{\frac{x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) \cdot \left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t \cdot t\right)}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}}\right) \]
    5. fma-neg57.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y, \left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y, -t \cdot t\right)}}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}\right) \]
    6. associate-+l+57.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\left(y + z\right) + \left(z + y\right)}, \left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y, -t \cdot t\right)}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}\right) \]
    7. +-commutative57.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(\left(y + z\right) + \color{blue}{\left(y + z\right)}, \left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y, -t \cdot t\right)}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}\right) \]
    8. count-257.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)}, \left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y, -t \cdot t\right)}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}\right) \]
    9. associate-+l+57.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right), \color{blue}{\left(y + z\right) + \left(z + y\right)}, -t \cdot t\right)}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}\right) \]
    10. +-commutative57.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right), \left(y + z\right) + \color{blue}{\left(y + z\right)}, -t \cdot t\right)}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}\right) \]
    11. count-257.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right), \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)}, -t \cdot t\right)}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}\right) \]
    12. fma-neg54.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) \cdot \left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) - t \cdot t\right)}}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) - t}\right) \]
    13. associate-+l+54.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \left(\left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) \cdot \left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) - t \cdot t\right)}{\color{blue}{\left(\left(y + z\right) + \left(z + y\right)\right)} - t}\right) \]
    14. +-commutative54.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \left(\left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) \cdot \left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) - t \cdot t\right)}{\left(\left(y + z\right) + \color{blue}{\left(y + z\right)}\right) - t}\right) \]
    15. count-254.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \frac{x \cdot \left(\left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) \cdot \left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) - t \cdot t\right)}{\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)} - t}\right) \]
  4. Applied egg-rr100.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, x \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(y + z, 2, t\right)\right)} \]
  5. Taylor expanded in t around inf 33.2%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot x} \]
  6. Step-by-step derivation
    1. *-commutative33.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot t} \]
  7. Simplified33.2%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot t} \]
  8. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

?
herbie shell --seed 2024137 
(FPCore (x y z t)
  :name "Graphics.Rendering.Plot.Render.Plot.Legend:renderLegendOutside from plot-0.2.3.4, B"
  :precision binary64
  (+ (* x (+ (+ (+ (+ y z) z) y) t)) (* y 5.0)))