Graphics.Rendering.Plot.Render.Plot.Legend:renderLegendOutside from plot-0.2.3.4, C

Percentage Accurate: 99.9% → 100.0%

Time: 6.2s

Alternatives: 8

Speedup: 1.0×

• 20.3% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* x (+ y z)) (* z 5.0)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * (y + z)) + (z * 5.0);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * (y + z)) + (z * 5.0d0)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * (y + z)) + (z * 5.0);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * (y + z)) + (z * 5.0)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * Float64(y + z)) + Float64(z * 5.0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * (y + z)) + (z * 5.0);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * 5.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* x (+ y z)) (* z 5.0)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * (y + z)) + (z * 5.0);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * (y + z)) + (z * 5.0d0)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * (y + z)) + (z * 5.0);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * (y + z)) + (z * 5.0)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * Float64(y + z)) + Float64(z * 5.0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * (y + z)) + (z * 5.0);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * 5.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 5, x \cdot \left(z + y\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (fma z 5.0 (* x (+ z y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return fma(z, 5.0, (x * (z + y)));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return fma(z, 5.0, Float64(x * Float64(z + y)))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(z * 5.0 + N[(x * N[(z + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot 5 + x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} \]

   2. fma-define 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 5, x \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right)} \]

4. Applied egg-rr 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 5, x \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right)} \]

5. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 5, x \cdot \left(z + y\right)\right) \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 62.3% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.35 \cdot 10^{+124}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -1.85 \cdot 10^{-6} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 7 \cdot 10^{-56}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot 5\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -1.35e+124)
   (* z x)
   (if (or (<= x -1.85e-6) (not (<= x 7e-56))) (* x y) (* z 5.0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1.35e+124) {
		tmp = z * x;
	} else if ((x <= -1.85e-6) || !(x <= 7e-56)) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = z * 5.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-1.35d+124)) then
        tmp = z * x
    else if ((x <= (-1.85d-6)) .or. (.not. (x <= 7d-56))) then
        tmp = x * y
    else
        tmp = z * 5.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1.35e+124) {
		tmp = z * x;
	} else if ((x <= -1.85e-6) || !(x <= 7e-56)) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = z * 5.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -1.35e+124:
		tmp = z * x
	elif (x <= -1.85e-6) or not (x <= 7e-56):
		tmp = x * y
	else:
		tmp = z * 5.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -1.35e+124)
		tmp = Float64(z * x);
	elseif ((x <= -1.85e-6) || !(x <= 7e-56))
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * 5.0);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -1.35e+124)
		tmp = z * x;
	elseif ((x <= -1.85e-6) || ~((x <= 7e-56)))
		tmp = x * y;
	else
		tmp = z * 5.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[x, -1.35e+124], N[(z * x), $MachinePrecision], If[Or[LessEqual[x, -1.85e-6], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 7e-56]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * 5.0), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if x < -1.34999999999999989e124

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around 0 68.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot z} \]

   if -1.34999999999999989e124 < x < -1.8500000000000001e-6 or 6.9999999999999996e-56 < x

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 87.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + \left(5 \cdot \frac{z}{y} + \frac{x \cdot z}{y}\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 87.8%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{x \cdot z}{y} + 5 \cdot \frac{z}{y}\right)}\right) \]

      2. associate-/l* 91.3%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(x + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{z}{y}} + 5 \cdot \frac{z}{y}\right)\right) \]

      3. distribute-rgt-out 92.3%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(x + \color{blue}{\frac{z}{y} \cdot \left(x + 5\right)}\right) \]

   5. Simplified 92.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + \frac{z}{y} \cdot \left(x + 5\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around 0 55.5%

      \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{x} \]

   if -1.8500000000000001e-6 < x < 6.9999999999999996e-56

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot 5 + x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 5, x \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right)} \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 5, x \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 74.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{5 \cdot z} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 74.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot 5} \]

   7. Simplified 74.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot 5} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 65.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.35 \cdot 10^{+124}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -1.85 \cdot 10^{-6} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 7 \cdot 10^{-56}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot 5\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 98.8% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -5 \lor \neg \left(x \leq 5\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(z + y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot 5 + x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -5.0) (not (<= x 5.0))) (* x (+ z y)) (+ (* z 5.0) (* x y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -5.0) || !(x <= 5.0)) {
		tmp = x * (z + y);
	} else {
		tmp = (z * 5.0) + (x * y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-5.0d0)) .or. (.not. (x <= 5.0d0))) then
        tmp = x * (z + y)
    else
        tmp = (z * 5.0d0) + (x * y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -5.0) || !(x <= 5.0)) {
		tmp = x * (z + y);
	} else {
		tmp = (z * 5.0) + (x * y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -5.0) or not (x <= 5.0):
		tmp = x * (z + y)
	else:
		tmp = (z * 5.0) + (x * y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -5.0) || !(x <= 5.0))
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(z + y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(z * 5.0) + Float64(x * y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -5.0) || ~((x <= 5.0)))
		tmp = x * (z + y);
	else
		tmp = (z * 5.0) + (x * y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -5.0], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 5.0]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[(z + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(z * 5.0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -5 or 5 < x

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 98.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} \]

   if -5 < x < 5

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 98.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} + z \cdot 5 \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -5 \lor \neg \left(x \leq 5\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(z + y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot 5 + x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 84.2% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -4.8 \cdot 10^{-5} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 3100\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(z + y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(5 + x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -4.8e-5) (not (<= x 3100.0))) (* x (+ z y)) (* z (+ 5.0 x))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -4.8e-5) || !(x <= 3100.0)) {
		tmp = x * (z + y);
	} else {
		tmp = z * (5.0 + x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-4.8d-5)) .or. (.not. (x <= 3100.0d0))) then
        tmp = x * (z + y)
    else
        tmp = z * (5.0d0 + x)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -4.8e-5) || !(x <= 3100.0)) {
		tmp = x * (z + y);
	} else {
		tmp = z * (5.0 + x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -4.8e-5) or not (x <= 3100.0):
		tmp = x * (z + y)
	else:
		tmp = z * (5.0 + x)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -4.8e-5) || !(x <= 3100.0))
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(z + y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * Float64(5.0 + x));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -4.8e-5) || ~((x <= 3100.0)))
		tmp = x * (z + y);
	else
		tmp = z * (5.0 + x);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -4.8e-5], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 3100.0]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[(z + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * N[(5.0 + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -4.8000000000000001e-5 or 3100 < x

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 99.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} \]

   if -4.8000000000000001e-5 < x < 3100

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 72.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{5 \cdot z + x \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 72.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot z + 5 \cdot z} \]

      2. distribute-rgt-in 72.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(x + 5\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 72.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(x + 5\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 86.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -4.8 \cdot 10^{-5} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 3100\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(z + y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(5 + x\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 83.7% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.02 \cdot 10^{-7} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 4 \cdot 10^{-56}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(z + y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot 5\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -1.02e-7) (not (<= x 4e-56))) (* x (+ z y)) (* z 5.0)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.02e-7) || !(x <= 4e-56)) {
		tmp = x * (z + y);
	} else {
		tmp = z * 5.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-1.02d-7)) .or. (.not. (x <= 4d-56))) then
        tmp = x * (z + y)
    else
        tmp = z * 5.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.02e-7) || !(x <= 4e-56)) {
		tmp = x * (z + y);
	} else {
		tmp = z * 5.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -1.02e-7) or not (x <= 4e-56):
		tmp = x * (z + y)
	else:
		tmp = z * 5.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -1.02e-7) || !(x <= 4e-56))
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(z + y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * 5.0);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -1.02e-7) || ~((x <= 4e-56)))
		tmp = x * (z + y);
	else
		tmp = z * 5.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -1.02e-7], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 4e-56]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[(z + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * 5.0), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -1.02e-7 or 4.0000000000000002e-56 < x

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 95.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} \]

   if -1.02e-7 < x < 4.0000000000000002e-56

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot 5 + x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 5, x \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right)} \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 5, x \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 74.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{5 \cdot z} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 74.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot 5} \]

   7. Simplified 74.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot 5} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 86.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.02 \cdot 10^{-7} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 4 \cdot 10^{-56}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(z + y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot 5\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 51.4% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -7.2 \cdot 10^{+85} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 3.2 \cdot 10^{+99}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -7.2e+85) (not (<= z 3.2e+99))) (* z x) (* x y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -7.2e+85) || !(z <= 3.2e+99)) {
		tmp = z * x;
	} else {
		tmp = x * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-7.2d+85)) .or. (.not. (z <= 3.2d+99))) then
        tmp = z * x
    else
        tmp = x * y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -7.2e+85) || !(z <= 3.2e+99)) {
		tmp = z * x;
	} else {
		tmp = x * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -7.2e+85) or not (z <= 3.2e+99):
		tmp = z * x
	else:
		tmp = x * y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -7.2e+85) || !(z <= 3.2e+99))
		tmp = Float64(z * x);
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -7.2e+85) || ~((z <= 3.2e+99)))
		tmp = z * x;
	else
		tmp = x * y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -7.2e+85], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 3.2e+99]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(z * x), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -7.1999999999999996e85 or 3.19999999999999999e99 < z

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 58.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around 0 51.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot z} \]

   if -7.1999999999999996e85 < z < 3.19999999999999999e99

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 93.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + \left(5 \cdot \frac{z}{y} + \frac{x \cdot z}{y}\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 93.8%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{x \cdot z}{y} + 5 \cdot \frac{z}{y}\right)}\right) \]

      2. associate-/l* 93.8%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(x + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{z}{y}} + 5 \cdot \frac{z}{y}\right)\right) \]

      3. distribute-rgt-out 93.8%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(x + \color{blue}{\frac{z}{y} \cdot \left(x + 5\right)}\right) \]

   5. Simplified 93.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + \frac{z}{y} \cdot \left(x + 5\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around 0 58.9%

      \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 56.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -7.2 \cdot 10^{+85} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 3.2 \cdot 10^{+99}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot \left(z + y\right) + z \cdot 5 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* x (+ z y)) (* z 5.0)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * (z + y)) + (z * 5.0);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * (z + y)) + (z * 5.0d0)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * (z + y)) + (z * 5.0);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * (z + y)) + (z * 5.0)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * Float64(z + y)) + Float64(z * 5.0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * (z + y)) + (z * 5.0);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * N[(z + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * 5.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(z + y\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 26.6% accurate, 3.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ z \cdot x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* z x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z * x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = z * x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z * x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return z * x

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(z * x)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = z * x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(z * x), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 67.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} \]

4. Taylor expanded in y around 0 29.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot z} \]

5. Final simplification 29.8%

   \[\leadsto z \cdot x \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Developer Target 1: 97.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x + 5\right) \cdot z + x \cdot y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* (+ x 5.0) z) (* x y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x + 5.0) * z) + (x * y);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = ((x + 5.0d0) * z) + (x * y)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x + 5.0) * z) + (x * y);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return ((x + 5.0) * z) + (x * y)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x + 5.0) * z) + Float64(x * y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = ((x + 5.0) * z) + (x * y);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(x + 5.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024137 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Graphics.Rendering.Plot.Render.Plot.Legend:renderLegendOutside from plot-0.2.3.4, C"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (! :herbie-platform default (+ (* (+ x 5) z) (* x y)))

  (+ (* x (+ y z)) (* z 5.0)))