Numeric.SpecFunctions:incompleteGamma from math-functions-0.1.5.2, A

Percentage Accurate: 99.9% → 99.9%

Time: 10.6s

Alternatives: 10

Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x \cdot \log y - y\right) - z\right) + \log t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (+ (- (- (* x (log y)) y) z) (log t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((x * log(y)) - y) - z) + log(t);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (((x * log(y)) - y) - z) + log(t)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((x * Math.log(y)) - y) - z) + Math.log(t);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (((x * math.log(y)) - y) - z) + math.log(t)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * log(y)) - y) - z) + log(t))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (((x * log(y)) - y) - z) + log(t);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - y), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision] + N[Log[t], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x \cdot \log y - y\right) - z\right) + \log t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (+ (- (- (* x (log y)) y) z) (log t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((x * log(y)) - y) - z) + log(t);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (((x * log(y)) - y) - z) + log(t)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((x * Math.log(y)) - y) - z) + Math.log(t);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (((x * math.log(y)) - y) - z) + math.log(t)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * log(y)) - y) - z) + log(t))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (((x * log(y)) - y) - z) + log(t);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - y), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision] + N[Log[t], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.9% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, \left(-y\right) - z\right) + \log t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (+ (fma x (log y) (- (- y) z)) (log t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return fma(x, log(y), (-y - z)) + log(t);
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(fma(x, log(y), Float64(Float64(-y) - z)) + log(t))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision] + N[((-y) - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[Log[t], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.8%

   \[\left(\left(x \cdot \log y - y\right) - z\right) + \log t \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. sub-neg 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y + \left(-y\right)\right)} - z\right) + \log t \]

   2. associate--l+ 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y + \left(\left(-y\right) - z\right)\right)} + \log t \]

   3. fma-define 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, \left(-y\right) - z\right)} + \log t \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, \left(-y\right) - z\right) + \log t} \]
4. Add Preprocessing
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 98.4% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := x \cdot \log y\\ t_2 := t\_1 - y\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_2 \leq -100000000000 \lor \neg \left(t\_2 \leq 5 \cdot 10^{-10}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1 - \left(y + z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\log t - z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* x (log y))) (t_2 (- t_1 y)))
   (if (or (<= t_2 -100000000000.0) (not (<= t_2 5e-10)))
     (- t_1 (+ y z))
     (- (log t) z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = x * log(y);
	double t_2 = t_1 - y;
	double tmp;
	if ((t_2 <= -100000000000.0) || !(t_2 <= 5e-10)) {
		tmp = t_1 - (y + z);
	} else {
		tmp = log(t) - z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: t_2
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = x * log(y)
    t_2 = t_1 - y
    if ((t_2 <= (-100000000000.0d0)) .or. (.not. (t_2 <= 5d-10))) then
        tmp = t_1 - (y + z)
    else
        tmp = log(t) - z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = x * Math.log(y);
	double t_2 = t_1 - y;
	double tmp;
	if ((t_2 <= -100000000000.0) || !(t_2 <= 5e-10)) {
		tmp = t_1 - (y + z);
	} else {
		tmp = Math.log(t) - z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	t_1 = x * math.log(y)
	t_2 = t_1 - y
	tmp = 0
	if (t_2 <= -100000000000.0) or not (t_2 <= 5e-10):
		tmp = t_1 - (y + z)
	else:
		tmp = math.log(t) - z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = Float64(x * log(y))
	t_2 = Float64(t_1 - y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((t_2 <= -100000000000.0) || !(t_2 <= 5e-10))
		tmp = Float64(t_1 - Float64(y + z));
	else
		tmp = Float64(log(t) - z);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = x * log(y);
	t_2 = t_1 - y;
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((t_2 <= -100000000000.0) || ~((t_2 <= 5e-10)))
		tmp = t_1 - (y + z);
	else
		tmp = log(t) - z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[(t$95$1 - y), $MachinePrecision]}, If[Or[LessEqual[t$95$2, -100000000000.0], N[Not[LessEqual[t$95$2, 5e-10]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(t$95$1 - N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[Log[t], $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (-.f64 (*.f64 x (log.f64 y)) y) < -1e11 or 5.00000000000000031e-10 < (-.f64 (*.f64 x (log.f64 y)) y)

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot \log y - y\right) - z\right) + \log t \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l- 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y - y\right) - \left(z - \log t\right)} \]

      2. associate--l- 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \log y - \left(y + \left(z - \log t\right)\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \log y - \left(y + \left(z - \log t\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 99.5%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \log y - \left(y + \color{blue}{z}\right) \]

   if -1e11 < (-.f64 (*.f64 x (log.f64 y)) y) < 5.00000000000000031e-10

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot \log y - y\right) - z\right) + \log t \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y + \left(-y\right)\right)} - z\right) + \log t \]

      2. associate--l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y + \left(\left(-y\right) - z\right)\right)} + \log t \]

      3. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, \left(-y\right) - z\right)} + \log t \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, \left(-y\right) - z\right) + \log t} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 98.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot z} + \log t \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 98.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)} + \log t \]

   7. Simplified 98.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)} + \log t \]

   8. Taylor expanded in z around 0 98.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log t + -1 \cdot z} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 98.8%

         \[\leadsto \log t + \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 98.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log t - z} \]

   10. Simplified 98.8%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log t - z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot \log y - y \leq -100000000000 \lor \neg \left(x \cdot \log y - y \leq 5 \cdot 10^{-10}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \log y - \left(y + z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\log t - z\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \log t + \left(\left(x \cdot \log y - y\right) - z\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (+ (log t) (- (- (* x (log y)) y) z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return log(t) + (((x * log(y)) - y) - z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = log(t) + (((x * log(y)) - y) - z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return Math.log(t) + (((x * Math.log(y)) - y) - z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return math.log(t) + (((x * math.log(y)) - y) - z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(log(t) + Float64(Float64(Float64(x * log(y)) - y) - z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = log(t) + (((x * log(y)) - y) - z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[Log[t], $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - y), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.8%

   \[\left(\left(x \cdot \log y - y\right) - z\right) + \log t \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Final simplification 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \log t + \left(\left(x \cdot \log y - y\right) - z\right) \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 89.5% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.4 \cdot 10^{+39} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 4.5 \cdot 10^{+21}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \log y - y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\log t - \left(y + z\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -1.4e+39) (not (<= x 4.5e+21)))
   (- (* x (log y)) y)
   (- (log t) (+ y z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.4e+39) || !(x <= 4.5e+21)) {
		tmp = (x * log(y)) - y;
	} else {
		tmp = log(t) - (y + z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-1.4d+39)) .or. (.not. (x <= 4.5d+21))) then
        tmp = (x * log(y)) - y
    else
        tmp = log(t) - (y + z)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.4e+39) || !(x <= 4.5e+21)) {
		tmp = (x * Math.log(y)) - y;
	} else {
		tmp = Math.log(t) - (y + z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -1.4e+39) or not (x <= 4.5e+21):
		tmp = (x * math.log(y)) - y
	else:
		tmp = math.log(t) - (y + z)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -1.4e+39) || !(x <= 4.5e+21))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * log(y)) - y);
	else
		tmp = Float64(log(t) - Float64(y + z));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -1.4e+39) || ~((x <= 4.5e+21)))
		tmp = (x * log(y)) - y;
	else
		tmp = log(t) - (y + z);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -1.4e+39], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 4.5e+21]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - y), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[Log[t], $MachinePrecision] - N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -1.40000000000000001e39 or 4.5e21 < x

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot \log y - y\right) - z\right) + \log t \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l- 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y - y\right) - \left(z - \log t\right)} \]

      2. associate--l- 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \log y - \left(y + \left(z - \log t\right)\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \log y - \left(y + \left(z - \log t\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 84.2%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \log y - \color{blue}{y} \]

   if -1.40000000000000001e39 < x < 4.5e21

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot \log y - y\right) - z\right) + \log t \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l- 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y - y\right) - \left(z - \log t\right)} \]

      2. associate--l- 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \log y - \left(y + \left(z - \log t\right)\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \log y - \left(y + \left(z - \log t\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 97.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log t - \left(y + z\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 91.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.4 \cdot 10^{+39} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 4.5 \cdot 10^{+21}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \log y - y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\log t - \left(y + z\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 82.4% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -5.6 \cdot 10^{+160} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 9.4 \cdot 10^{+24}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \log y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\log t - \left(y + z\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -5.6e+160) (not (<= x 9.4e+24)))
   (* x (log y))
   (- (log t) (+ y z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -5.6e+160) || !(x <= 9.4e+24)) {
		tmp = x * log(y);
	} else {
		tmp = log(t) - (y + z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-5.6d+160)) .or. (.not. (x <= 9.4d+24))) then
        tmp = x * log(y)
    else
        tmp = log(t) - (y + z)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -5.6e+160) || !(x <= 9.4e+24)) {
		tmp = x * Math.log(y);
	} else {
		tmp = Math.log(t) - (y + z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -5.6e+160) or not (x <= 9.4e+24):
		tmp = x * math.log(y)
	else:
		tmp = math.log(t) - (y + z)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -5.6e+160) || !(x <= 9.4e+24))
		tmp = Float64(x * log(y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(log(t) - Float64(y + z));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -5.6e+160) || ~((x <= 9.4e+24)))
		tmp = x * log(y);
	else
		tmp = log(t) - (y + z);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -5.6e+160], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 9.4e+24]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[Log[t], $MachinePrecision] - N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -5.5999999999999999e160 or 9.3999999999999999e24 < x

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot \log y - y\right) - z\right) + \log t \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l- 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y - y\right) - \left(z - \log t\right)} \]

      2. associate--l- 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \log y - \left(y + \left(z - \log t\right)\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \log y - \left(y + \left(z - \log t\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 99.7%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \log y - \left(y + \color{blue}{z}\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around inf 72.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \log y} \]

   if -5.5999999999999999e160 < x < 9.3999999999999999e24

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot \log y - y\right) - z\right) + \log t \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l- 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y - y\right) - \left(z - \log t\right)} \]

      2. associate--l- 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \log y - \left(y + \left(z - \log t\right)\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \log y - \left(y + \left(z - \log t\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 89.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log t - \left(y + z\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 84.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -5.6 \cdot 10^{+160} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 9.4 \cdot 10^{+24}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \log y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\log t - \left(y + z\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 70.2% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -2.6 \cdot 10^{+160} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 3.3 \cdot 10^{+24}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \log y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(-y\right) - z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -2.6e+160) (not (<= x 3.3e+24))) (* x (log y)) (- (- y) z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -2.6e+160) || !(x <= 3.3e+24)) {
		tmp = x * log(y);
	} else {
		tmp = -y - z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-2.6d+160)) .or. (.not. (x <= 3.3d+24))) then
        tmp = x * log(y)
    else
        tmp = -y - z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -2.6e+160) || !(x <= 3.3e+24)) {
		tmp = x * Math.log(y);
	} else {
		tmp = -y - z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -2.6e+160) or not (x <= 3.3e+24):
		tmp = x * math.log(y)
	else:
		tmp = -y - z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -2.6e+160) || !(x <= 3.3e+24))
		tmp = Float64(x * log(y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(-y) - z);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -2.6e+160) || ~((x <= 3.3e+24)))
		tmp = x * log(y);
	else
		tmp = -y - z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -2.6e+160], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 3.3e+24]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[((-y) - z), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -2.6e160 or 3.2999999999999999e24 < x

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot \log y - y\right) - z\right) + \log t \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l- 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y - y\right) - \left(z - \log t\right)} \]

      2. associate--l- 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \log y - \left(y + \left(z - \log t\right)\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \log y - \left(y + \left(z - \log t\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 99.7%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \log y - \left(y + \color{blue}{z}\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around inf 72.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \log y} \]

   if -2.6e160 < x < 3.2999999999999999e24

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot \log y - y\right) - z\right) + \log t \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l- 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y - y\right) - \left(z - \log t\right)} \]

      2. associate--l- 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \log y - \left(y + \left(z - \log t\right)\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \log y - \left(y + \left(z - \log t\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 83.8%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \log y - \left(y + \color{blue}{z}\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around 0 73.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y + z\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 73.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\left(y + z\right)} \]

      2. distribute-neg-in 73.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) + \left(-z\right)} \]

      3. sub-neg 73.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) - z} \]

   8. Simplified 73.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) - z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 73.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -2.6 \cdot 10^{+160} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 3.3 \cdot 10^{+24}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \log y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(-y\right) - z\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 48.3% accurate, 17.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -7.2 \cdot 10^{+97} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 185000000\right):\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -7.2e+97) (not (<= z 185000000.0))) (- z) (- y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -7.2e+97) || !(z <= 185000000.0)) {
		tmp = -z;
	} else {
		tmp = -y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-7.2d+97)) .or. (.not. (z <= 185000000.0d0))) then
        tmp = -z
    else
        tmp = -y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -7.2e+97) || !(z <= 185000000.0)) {
		tmp = -z;
	} else {
		tmp = -y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -7.2e+97) or not (z <= 185000000.0):
		tmp = -z
	else:
		tmp = -y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -7.2e+97) || !(z <= 185000000.0))
		tmp = Float64(-z);
	else
		tmp = Float64(-y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -7.2e+97) || ~((z <= 185000000.0)))
		tmp = -z;
	else
		tmp = -y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -7.2e+97], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 185000000.0]], $MachinePrecision]], (-z), (-y)]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -7.19999999999999932e97 or 1.85e8 < z

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot \log y - y\right) - z\right) + \log t \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l- 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y - y\right) - \left(z - \log t\right)} \]

      2. associate--l- 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \log y - \left(y + \left(z - \log t\right)\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \log y - \left(y + \left(z - \log t\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 99.5%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \log y - \left(y + \color{blue}{z}\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around inf 69.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot z} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 69.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]

   8. Simplified 69.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]

   if -7.19999999999999932e97 < z < 1.85e8

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot \log y - y\right) - z\right) + \log t \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y + \left(-y\right)\right)} - z\right) + \log t \]

      2. associate--l+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y + \left(\left(-y\right) - z\right)\right)} + \log t \]

      3. fma-define 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, \left(-y\right) - z\right)} + \log t \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, \left(-y\right) - z\right) + \log t} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 56.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot y} + \log t \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 56.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} + \log t \]

   7. Simplified 56.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} + \log t \]

   8. Taylor expanded in y around inf 38.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot y} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 38.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-y} \]

   10. Simplified 38.6%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 51.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -7.2 \cdot 10^{+97} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 185000000\right):\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 57.8% accurate, 52.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(-y\right) - z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (- (- y) z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return -y - z;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = -y - z
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return -y - z;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return -y - z

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(-y) - z)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = -y - z;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[((-y) - z), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.8%

   \[\left(\left(x \cdot \log y - y\right) - z\right) + \log t \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-+l- 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y - y\right) - \left(z - \log t\right)} \]

   2. associate--l- 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \log y - \left(y + \left(z - \log t\right)\right)} \]

3. Simplified 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \log y - \left(y + \left(z - \log t\right)\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 88.8%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot \log y - \left(y + \color{blue}{z}\right) \]

6. Taylor expanded in x around 0 58.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y + z\right)} \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

   1. neg-mul-1 58.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\left(y + z\right)} \]

   2. distribute-neg-in 58.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) + \left(-z\right)} \]

   3. sub-neg 58.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) - z} \]

8. Simplified 58.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) - z} \]
9. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 29.2% accurate, 104.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (- y))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return -y;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = -y
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return -y;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return -y

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(-y)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = -y;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := (-y)

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.8%

   \[\left(\left(x \cdot \log y - y\right) - z\right) + \log t \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. sub-neg 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y + \left(-y\right)\right)} - z\right) + \log t \]

   2. associate--l+ 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y + \left(\left(-y\right) - z\right)\right)} + \log t \]

   3. fma-define 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, \left(-y\right) - z\right)} + \log t \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, \left(-y\right) - z\right) + \log t} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 38.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot y} + \log t \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. mul-1-neg 38.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} + \log t \]

7. Simplified 38.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} + \log t \]

8. Taylor expanded in y around inf 27.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot y} \]
9. Step-by-step derivation

   1. mul-1-neg 27.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-y} \]

10. Simplified 27.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-y} \]
11. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 2.3% accurate, 209.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 z)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return z;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = z
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return z;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return z

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return z
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = z;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := z

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.8%

   \[\left(\left(x \cdot \log y - y\right) - z\right) + \log t \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-+l- 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y - y\right) - \left(z - \log t\right)} \]

   2. associate--l- 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \log y - \left(y + \left(z - \log t\right)\right)} \]

3. Simplified 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \log y - \left(y + \left(z - \log t\right)\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 88.8%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot \log y - \left(y + \color{blue}{z}\right) \]

6. Taylor expanded in z around inf 32.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot z} \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

   1. mul-1-neg 32.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]

8. Simplified 32.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]
9. Step-by-step derivation

   1. neg-sub0 32.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0 - z} \]

   2. sub-neg 32.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0 + \left(-z\right)} \]

   3. add-sqr-sqrt 13.1%

      \[\leadsto 0 + \color{blue}{\sqrt{-z} \cdot \sqrt{-z}} \]

   4. sqrt-unprod 6.0%

      \[\leadsto 0 + \color{blue}{\sqrt{\left(-z\right) \cdot \left(-z\right)}} \]

   5. sqr-neg 6.0%

      \[\leadsto 0 + \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot z}} \]

   6. sqrt-unprod 0.8%

      \[\leadsto 0 + \color{blue}{\sqrt{z} \cdot \sqrt{z}} \]

   7. add-sqr-sqrt 2.1%

      \[\leadsto 0 + \color{blue}{z} \]

10. Applied egg-rr 2.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0 + z} \]
11. Step-by-step derivation

    1. +-lft-identity 2.1%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]

12. Simplified 2.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]
13. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024135 
(FPCore (x y z t)
  :name "Numeric.SpecFunctions:incompleteGamma from math-functions-0.1.5.2, A"
  :precision binary64
  (+ (- (- (* x (log y)) y) z) (log t)))