Diagrams.ThreeD.Shapes:frustum from diagrams-lib-1.3.0.3, A

Percentage Accurate: 90.2% → 96.2%

Time: 14.4s

Alternatives: 14

Speedup: 0.6×

• 48.1% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (* 2.0 (- (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* (* (+ a (* b c)) c) i))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (((a + (b * c)) * c) * i));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = 2.0d0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (((a + (b * c)) * c) * i))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (((a + (b * c)) * c) * i));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (((a + (b * c)) * c) * i))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(2.0 * Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) - Float64(Float64(Float64(a + Float64(b * c)) * c) * i)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (((a + (b * c)) * c) * i));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(2.0 * N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(N[(a + N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * c), $MachinePrecision] * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 90.2% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (* 2.0 (- (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* (* (+ a (* b c)) c) i))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (((a + (b * c)) * c) * i));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = 2.0d0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (((a + (b * c)) * c) * i))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (((a + (b * c)) * c) * i));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (((a + (b * c)) * c) * i))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(2.0 * Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) - Float64(Float64(Float64(a + Float64(b * c)) * c) * i)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (((a + (b * c)) * c) * i));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(2.0 * N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(N[(a + N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * c), $MachinePrecision] * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 96.2% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := a + b \cdot c\\ t_2 := z \cdot t + x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_2 - i \cdot \left(c \cdot t\_1\right) \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(t\_2 - t\_1 \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(b \cdot i + \frac{a \cdot i}{c}\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ a (* b c))) (t_2 (+ (* z t) (* x y))))
   (if (<= (- t_2 (* i (* c t_1))) INFINITY)
     (* 2.0 (- t_2 (* t_1 (* c i))))
     (* -2.0 (* c (* c (+ (* b i) (/ (* a i) c))))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = a + (b * c);
	double t_2 = (z * t) + (x * y);
	double tmp;
	if ((t_2 - (i * (c * t_1))) <= ((double) INFINITY)) {
		tmp = 2.0 * (t_2 - (t_1 * (c * i)));
	} else {
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * (c * ((b * i) + ((a * i) / c))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = a + (b * c);
	double t_2 = (z * t) + (x * y);
	double tmp;
	if ((t_2 - (i * (c * t_1))) <= Double.POSITIVE_INFINITY) {
		tmp = 2.0 * (t_2 - (t_1 * (c * i)));
	} else {
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * (c * ((b * i) + ((a * i) / c))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	t_1 = a + (b * c)
	t_2 = (z * t) + (x * y)
	tmp = 0
	if (t_2 - (i * (c * t_1))) <= math.inf:
		tmp = 2.0 * (t_2 - (t_1 * (c * i)))
	else:
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * (c * ((b * i) + ((a * i) / c))))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = Float64(a + Float64(b * c))
	t_2 = Float64(Float64(z * t) + Float64(x * y))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(t_2 - Float64(i * Float64(c * t_1))) <= Inf)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(t_2 - Float64(t_1 * Float64(c * i))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(-2.0 * Float64(c * Float64(c * Float64(Float64(b * i) + Float64(Float64(a * i) / c)))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = a + (b * c);
	t_2 = (z * t) + (x * y);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((t_2 - (i * (c * t_1))) <= Inf)
		tmp = 2.0 * (t_2 - (t_1 * (c * i)));
	else
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * (c * ((b * i) + ((a * i) / c))));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(a + N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[(N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(t$95$2 - N[(i * N[(c * t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], Infinity], N[(2.0 * N[(t$95$2 - N[(t$95$1 * N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(-2.0 * N[(c * N[(c * N[(N[(b * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * i), $MachinePrecision] / c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (-.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (*.f64 z t)) (*.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 a (*.f64 b c)) c) i)) < +inf.0

   1. Initial program 93.8%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 93.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      2. associate-*l* 99.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 99.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)} - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      2. +-commutative 99.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot t + x \cdot y\right)} - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 99.5%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot t + x \cdot y\right)} - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   if +inf.0 < (-.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (*.f64 z t)) (*.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 a (*.f64 b c)) c) i))

   1. Initial program 0.0%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate--l+ 0.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + \left(z \cdot t - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 0.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{t \cdot z} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      3. associate--l+ 0.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot y + t \cdot z\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)} \]

      4. associate--l+ 0.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + \left(t \cdot z - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]

      5. *-commutative 0.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot t} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      6. associate--l+ 0.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)} \]

      7. fma-define 9.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      8. *-commutative 9.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

      9. associate-*l* 27.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

      10. +-commutative 27.3%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(b \cdot c + a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      11. fma-define 27.3%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 27.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in i around inf 54.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(i \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in c around inf 54.8%

      \[\leadsto -2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot \left(b \cdot i + \frac{a \cdot i}{c}\right)\right)}\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 97.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\left(z \cdot t + x \cdot y\right) - i \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right) \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot t + x \cdot y\right) - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(b \cdot i + \frac{a \cdot i}{c}\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 94.5% accurate, 0.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (* 2.0 (- (fma x y (* z t)) (* (+ a (* b c)) (* c i)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return 2.0 * (fma(x, y, (z * t)) - ((a + (b * c)) * (c * i)));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(2.0 * Float64(fma(x, y, Float64(z * t)) - Float64(Float64(a + Float64(b * c)) * Float64(c * i))))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(2.0 * N[(N[(x * y + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(a + N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 89.8%

   \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. fma-define 90.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

   2. associate-*l* 96.4%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

3. Simplified 96.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 86.0% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \cdot t \leq -5 \cdot 10^{-58} \lor \neg \left(z \cdot t \leq 4 \cdot 10^{-76}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot t + x \cdot y\right) - \left(b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* z t) -5e-58) (not (<= (* z t) 4e-76)))
   (* 2.0 (- (+ (* z t) (* x y)) (* (* b c) (* c i))))
   (* 2.0 (- (* x y) (* (+ a (* b c)) (* c i))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((z * t) <= -5e-58) || !((z * t) <= 4e-76)) {
		tmp = 2.0 * (((z * t) + (x * y)) - ((b * c) * (c * i)));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * ((x * y) - ((a + (b * c)) * (c * i)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((z * t) <= (-5d-58)) .or. (.not. ((z * t) <= 4d-76))) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * (((z * t) + (x * y)) - ((b * c) * (c * i)))
    else
        tmp = 2.0d0 * ((x * y) - ((a + (b * c)) * (c * i)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((z * t) <= -5e-58) || !((z * t) <= 4e-76)) {
		tmp = 2.0 * (((z * t) + (x * y)) - ((b * c) * (c * i)));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * ((x * y) - ((a + (b * c)) * (c * i)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if ((z * t) <= -5e-58) or not ((z * t) <= 4e-76):
		tmp = 2.0 * (((z * t) + (x * y)) - ((b * c) * (c * i)))
	else:
		tmp = 2.0 * ((x * y) - ((a + (b * c)) * (c * i)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(z * t) <= -5e-58) || !(Float64(z * t) <= 4e-76))
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(Float64(Float64(z * t) + Float64(x * y)) - Float64(Float64(b * c) * Float64(c * i))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(Float64(x * y) - Float64(Float64(a + Float64(b * c)) * Float64(c * i))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((z * t) <= -5e-58) || ~(((z * t) <= 4e-76)))
		tmp = 2.0 * (((z * t) + (x * y)) - ((b * c) * (c * i)));
	else
		tmp = 2.0 * ((x * y) - ((a + (b * c)) * (c * i)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision], -5e-58], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision], 4e-76]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(2.0 * N[(N[(N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision] * N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(a + N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 z t) < -4.99999999999999977e-58 or 3.99999999999999971e-76 < (*.f64 z t)

   1. Initial program 89.0%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 89.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      2. associate-*l* 95.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 95.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 94.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)} - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      2. +-commutative 94.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot t + x \cdot y\right)} - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 94.6%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot t + x \cdot y\right)} - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   7. Taylor expanded in a around 0 89.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot t + x \cdot y\right) - \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot c\right)} \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   if -4.99999999999999977e-58 < (*.f64 z t) < 3.99999999999999971e-76

   1. Initial program 90.9%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 90.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      2. associate-*l* 98.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 98.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 98.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)} - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      2. +-commutative 98.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot t + x \cdot y\right)} - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 98.0%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot t + x \cdot y\right)} - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   7. Taylor expanded in z around inf 81.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t + \frac{x \cdot y}{z}\right)} - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   8. Taylor expanded in z around 0 98.0%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot y} - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 92.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \cdot t \leq -5 \cdot 10^{-58} \lor \neg \left(z \cdot t \leq 4 \cdot 10^{-76}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot t + x \cdot y\right) - \left(b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 85.5% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \cdot t \leq -5 \cdot 10^{-58} \lor \neg \left(z \cdot t \leq 4 \cdot 10^{-76}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(z \cdot t + \left(x \cdot y - b \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* z t) -5e-58) (not (<= (* z t) 4e-76)))
   (* 2.0 (+ (* z t) (- (* x y) (* b (* c (* c i))))))
   (* 2.0 (- (* x y) (* (+ a (* b c)) (* c i))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((z * t) <= -5e-58) || !((z * t) <= 4e-76)) {
		tmp = 2.0 * ((z * t) + ((x * y) - (b * (c * (c * i)))));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * ((x * y) - ((a + (b * c)) * (c * i)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((z * t) <= (-5d-58)) .or. (.not. ((z * t) <= 4d-76))) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * ((z * t) + ((x * y) - (b * (c * (c * i)))))
    else
        tmp = 2.0d0 * ((x * y) - ((a + (b * c)) * (c * i)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((z * t) <= -5e-58) || !((z * t) <= 4e-76)) {
		tmp = 2.0 * ((z * t) + ((x * y) - (b * (c * (c * i)))));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * ((x * y) - ((a + (b * c)) * (c * i)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if ((z * t) <= -5e-58) or not ((z * t) <= 4e-76):
		tmp = 2.0 * ((z * t) + ((x * y) - (b * (c * (c * i)))))
	else:
		tmp = 2.0 * ((x * y) - ((a + (b * c)) * (c * i)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(z * t) <= -5e-58) || !(Float64(z * t) <= 4e-76))
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(Float64(z * t) + Float64(Float64(x * y) - Float64(b * Float64(c * Float64(c * i))))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(Float64(x * y) - Float64(Float64(a + Float64(b * c)) * Float64(c * i))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((z * t) <= -5e-58) || ~(((z * t) <= 4e-76)))
		tmp = 2.0 * ((z * t) + ((x * y) - (b * (c * (c * i)))));
	else
		tmp = 2.0 * ((x * y) - ((a + (b * c)) * (c * i)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision], -5e-58], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision], 4e-76]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(2.0 * N[(N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] - N[(b * N[(c * N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(a + N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 z t) < -4.99999999999999977e-58 or 3.99999999999999971e-76 < (*.f64 z t)

   1. Initial program 89.0%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 89.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      2. associate-*l* 95.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 95.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 94.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)} - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      2. +-commutative 94.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot t + x \cdot y\right)} - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 94.6%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot t + x \cdot y\right)} - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   7. Taylor expanded in a around 0 89.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot t + x \cdot y\right) - \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot c\right)} \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right) \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate--l+ 89.2%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot t + \left(x \cdot y - \left(b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 86.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(z \cdot t + \left(x \cdot y - \color{blue}{b \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)}\right)\right) \]

   9. Applied egg-rr 86.6%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot t + \left(x \cdot y - b \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)\right)\right)} \]

   if -4.99999999999999977e-58 < (*.f64 z t) < 3.99999999999999971e-76

   1. Initial program 90.9%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 90.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      2. associate-*l* 98.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 98.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 98.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)} - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      2. +-commutative 98.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot t + x \cdot y\right)} - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 98.0%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot t + x \cdot y\right)} - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   7. Taylor expanded in z around inf 81.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t + \frac{x \cdot y}{z}\right)} - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   8. Taylor expanded in z around 0 98.0%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot y} - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 91.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \cdot t \leq -5 \cdot 10^{-58} \lor \neg \left(z \cdot t \leq 4 \cdot 10^{-76}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(z \cdot t + \left(x \cdot y - b \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 90.2% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := z \cdot t + x \cdot y\\ t_2 := c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_2 \leq 10^{+261}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(t\_1 - i \cdot t\_2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(t\_1 - \left(b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ (* z t) (* x y))) (t_2 (* c (+ a (* b c)))))
   (if (<= t_2 1e+261)
     (* 2.0 (- t_1 (* i t_2)))
     (* 2.0 (- t_1 (* (* b c) (* c i)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = (z * t) + (x * y);
	double t_2 = c * (a + (b * c));
	double tmp;
	if (t_2 <= 1e+261) {
		tmp = 2.0 * (t_1 - (i * t_2));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * (t_1 - ((b * c) * (c * i)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: t_2
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = (z * t) + (x * y)
    t_2 = c * (a + (b * c))
    if (t_2 <= 1d+261) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * (t_1 - (i * t_2))
    else
        tmp = 2.0d0 * (t_1 - ((b * c) * (c * i)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = (z * t) + (x * y);
	double t_2 = c * (a + (b * c));
	double tmp;
	if (t_2 <= 1e+261) {
		tmp = 2.0 * (t_1 - (i * t_2));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * (t_1 - ((b * c) * (c * i)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	t_1 = (z * t) + (x * y)
	t_2 = c * (a + (b * c))
	tmp = 0
	if t_2 <= 1e+261:
		tmp = 2.0 * (t_1 - (i * t_2))
	else:
		tmp = 2.0 * (t_1 - ((b * c) * (c * i)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(z * t) + Float64(x * y))
	t_2 = Float64(c * Float64(a + Float64(b * c)))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_2 <= 1e+261)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(t_1 - Float64(i * t_2)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(t_1 - Float64(Float64(b * c) * Float64(c * i))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = (z * t) + (x * y);
	t_2 = c * (a + (b * c));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t_2 <= 1e+261)
		tmp = 2.0 * (t_1 - (i * t_2));
	else
		tmp = 2.0 * (t_1 - ((b * c) * (c * i)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[(c * N[(a + N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$2, 1e+261], N[(2.0 * N[(t$95$1 - N[(i * t$95$2), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[(t$95$1 - N[(N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision] * N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 (+.f64 a (*.f64 b c)) c) < 9.9999999999999993e260

   1. Initial program 95.4%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   if 9.9999999999999993e260 < (*.f64 (+.f64 a (*.f64 b c)) c)

   1. Initial program 58.6%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 61.2%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      2. associate-*l* 94.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 94.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 92.2%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)} - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      2. +-commutative 92.2%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot t + x \cdot y\right)} - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 92.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot t + x \cdot y\right)} - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   7. Taylor expanded in a around 0 89.9%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot t + x \cdot y\right) - \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot c\right)} \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 94.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \leq 10^{+261}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot t + x \cdot y\right) - i \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot t + x \cdot y\right) - \left(b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 87.1% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \leq -3300000000000 \lor \neg \left(c \leq 1.3 \cdot 10^{+15}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y - c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot t + x \cdot y\right) - i \cdot \left(a \cdot c\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= c -3300000000000.0) (not (<= c 1.3e+15)))
   (* 2.0 (- (* x y) (* c (* (+ a (* b c)) i))))
   (* 2.0 (- (+ (* z t) (* x y)) (* i (* a c))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((c <= -3300000000000.0) || !(c <= 1.3e+15)) {
		tmp = 2.0 * ((x * y) - (c * ((a + (b * c)) * i)));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * (((z * t) + (x * y)) - (i * (a * c)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((c <= (-3300000000000.0d0)) .or. (.not. (c <= 1.3d+15))) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * ((x * y) - (c * ((a + (b * c)) * i)))
    else
        tmp = 2.0d0 * (((z * t) + (x * y)) - (i * (a * c)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((c <= -3300000000000.0) || !(c <= 1.3e+15)) {
		tmp = 2.0 * ((x * y) - (c * ((a + (b * c)) * i)));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * (((z * t) + (x * y)) - (i * (a * c)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if (c <= -3300000000000.0) or not (c <= 1.3e+15):
		tmp = 2.0 * ((x * y) - (c * ((a + (b * c)) * i)))
	else:
		tmp = 2.0 * (((z * t) + (x * y)) - (i * (a * c)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((c <= -3300000000000.0) || !(c <= 1.3e+15))
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(Float64(x * y) - Float64(c * Float64(Float64(a + Float64(b * c)) * i))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(Float64(Float64(z * t) + Float64(x * y)) - Float64(i * Float64(a * c))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((c <= -3300000000000.0) || ~((c <= 1.3e+15)))
		tmp = 2.0 * ((x * y) - (c * ((a + (b * c)) * i)));
	else
		tmp = 2.0 * (((z * t) + (x * y)) - (i * (a * c)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[c, -3300000000000.0], N[Not[LessEqual[c, 1.3e+15]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(2.0 * N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] - N[(c * N[(N[(a + N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[(N[(N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(i * N[(a * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if c < -3.3e12 or 1.3e15 < c

   1. Initial program 77.6%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 84.9%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y - c \cdot \left(i \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)\right)} \]

   if -3.3e12 < c < 1.3e15

   1. Initial program 99.2%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around inf 93.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot c\right)} \cdot i\right) \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 93.2%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot a\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

   5. Simplified 93.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot a\right)} \cdot i\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 89.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \leq -3300000000000 \lor \neg \left(c \leq 1.3 \cdot 10^{+15}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y - c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot t + x \cdot y\right) - i \cdot \left(a \cdot c\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 79.4% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \leq -6.9 \cdot 10^{-16} \lor \neg \left(c \leq 7.3 \cdot 10^{-124}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y - c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(z \cdot t + x \cdot y\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= c -6.9e-16) (not (<= c 7.3e-124)))
   (* 2.0 (- (* x y) (* c (* (+ a (* b c)) i))))
   (* 2.0 (+ (* z t) (* x y)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((c <= -6.9e-16) || !(c <= 7.3e-124)) {
		tmp = 2.0 * ((x * y) - (c * ((a + (b * c)) * i)));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * ((z * t) + (x * y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((c <= (-6.9d-16)) .or. (.not. (c <= 7.3d-124))) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * ((x * y) - (c * ((a + (b * c)) * i)))
    else
        tmp = 2.0d0 * ((z * t) + (x * y))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((c <= -6.9e-16) || !(c <= 7.3e-124)) {
		tmp = 2.0 * ((x * y) - (c * ((a + (b * c)) * i)));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * ((z * t) + (x * y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if (c <= -6.9e-16) or not (c <= 7.3e-124):
		tmp = 2.0 * ((x * y) - (c * ((a + (b * c)) * i)))
	else:
		tmp = 2.0 * ((z * t) + (x * y))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((c <= -6.9e-16) || !(c <= 7.3e-124))
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(Float64(x * y) - Float64(c * Float64(Float64(a + Float64(b * c)) * i))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(Float64(z * t) + Float64(x * y)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((c <= -6.9e-16) || ~((c <= 7.3e-124)))
		tmp = 2.0 * ((x * y) - (c * ((a + (b * c)) * i)));
	else
		tmp = 2.0 * ((z * t) + (x * y));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[c, -6.9e-16], N[Not[LessEqual[c, 7.3e-124]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(2.0 * N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] - N[(c * N[(N[(a + N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[(N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if c < -6.8999999999999997e-16 or 7.3e-124 < c

   1. Initial program 82.9%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 82.3%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y - c \cdot \left(i \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)\right)} \]

   if -6.8999999999999997e-16 < c < 7.3e-124

   1. Initial program 99.0%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in c around 0 82.7%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 82.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \leq -6.9 \cdot 10^{-16} \lor \neg \left(c \leq 7.3 \cdot 10^{-124}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y - c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(z \cdot t + x \cdot y\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 72.1% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.5 \cdot 10^{+117}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(2 \cdot \left(t + x \cdot \frac{y}{z}\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 5.1 \cdot 10^{-109}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(z \cdot t + x \cdot y\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -2.5e+117)
   (* z (* 2.0 (+ t (* x (/ y z)))))
   (if (<= z 5.1e-109)
     (* 2.0 (- (* x y) (* (+ a (* b c)) (* c i))))
     (* 2.0 (+ (* z t) (* x y))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -2.5e+117) {
		tmp = z * (2.0 * (t + (x * (y / z))));
	} else if (z <= 5.1e-109) {
		tmp = 2.0 * ((x * y) - ((a + (b * c)) * (c * i)));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * ((z * t) + (x * y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-2.5d+117)) then
        tmp = z * (2.0d0 * (t + (x * (y / z))))
    else if (z <= 5.1d-109) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * ((x * y) - ((a + (b * c)) * (c * i)))
    else
        tmp = 2.0d0 * ((z * t) + (x * y))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -2.5e+117) {
		tmp = z * (2.0 * (t + (x * (y / z))));
	} else if (z <= 5.1e-109) {
		tmp = 2.0 * ((x * y) - ((a + (b * c)) * (c * i)));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * ((z * t) + (x * y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -2.5e+117:
		tmp = z * (2.0 * (t + (x * (y / z))))
	elif z <= 5.1e-109:
		tmp = 2.0 * ((x * y) - ((a + (b * c)) * (c * i)))
	else:
		tmp = 2.0 * ((z * t) + (x * y))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -2.5e+117)
		tmp = Float64(z * Float64(2.0 * Float64(t + Float64(x * Float64(y / z)))));
	elseif (z <= 5.1e-109)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(Float64(x * y) - Float64(Float64(a + Float64(b * c)) * Float64(c * i))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(Float64(z * t) + Float64(x * y)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -2.5e+117)
		tmp = z * (2.0 * (t + (x * (y / z))));
	elseif (z <= 5.1e-109)
		tmp = 2.0 * ((x * y) - ((a + (b * c)) * (c * i)));
	else
		tmp = 2.0 * ((z * t) + (x * y));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[z, -2.5e+117], N[(z * N[(2.0 * N[(t + N[(x * N[(y / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 5.1e-109], N[(2.0 * N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(a + N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[(N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if z < -2.49999999999999992e117

   1. Initial program 85.6%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in c around 0 71.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 77.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(2 \cdot t + 2 \cdot \frac{x \cdot y}{z}\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-lft-out 77.1%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot \left(t + \frac{x \cdot y}{z}\right)\right)} \]

      2. associate-/l* 79.9%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(2 \cdot \left(t + \color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{y}{z}}\right)\right) \]

   6. Simplified 79.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(2 \cdot \left(t + x \cdot \frac{y}{z}\right)\right)} \]

   if -2.49999999999999992e117 < z < 5.10000000000000041e-109

   1. Initial program 93.6%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 93.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      2. associate-*l* 98.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 98.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 98.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)} - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      2. +-commutative 98.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot t + x \cdot y\right)} - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 98.4%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot t + x \cdot y\right)} - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   7. Taylor expanded in z around inf 84.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t + \frac{x \cdot y}{z}\right)} - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   8. Taylor expanded in z around 0 85.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot y} - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   if 5.10000000000000041e-109 < z

   1. Initial program 85.5%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in c around 0 66.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 78.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.5 \cdot 10^{+117}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(2 \cdot \left(t + x \cdot \frac{y}{z}\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 5.1 \cdot 10^{-109}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(z \cdot t + x \cdot y\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 72.0% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \leq -5.5 \cdot 10^{+122} \lor \neg \left(c \leq 1.35 \cdot 10^{+15}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y - c \cdot \left(b \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(z \cdot t + x \cdot y\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= c -5.5e+122) (not (<= c 1.35e+15)))
   (* 2.0 (- (* x y) (* c (* b (* c i)))))
   (* 2.0 (+ (* z t) (* x y)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((c <= -5.5e+122) || !(c <= 1.35e+15)) {
		tmp = 2.0 * ((x * y) - (c * (b * (c * i))));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * ((z * t) + (x * y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((c <= (-5.5d+122)) .or. (.not. (c <= 1.35d+15))) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * ((x * y) - (c * (b * (c * i))))
    else
        tmp = 2.0d0 * ((z * t) + (x * y))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((c <= -5.5e+122) || !(c <= 1.35e+15)) {
		tmp = 2.0 * ((x * y) - (c * (b * (c * i))));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * ((z * t) + (x * y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if (c <= -5.5e+122) or not (c <= 1.35e+15):
		tmp = 2.0 * ((x * y) - (c * (b * (c * i))))
	else:
		tmp = 2.0 * ((z * t) + (x * y))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((c <= -5.5e+122) || !(c <= 1.35e+15))
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(Float64(x * y) - Float64(c * Float64(b * Float64(c * i)))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(Float64(z * t) + Float64(x * y)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((c <= -5.5e+122) || ~((c <= 1.35e+15)))
		tmp = 2.0 * ((x * y) - (c * (b * (c * i))));
	else
		tmp = 2.0 * ((z * t) + (x * y));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[c, -5.5e+122], N[Not[LessEqual[c, 1.35e+15]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(2.0 * N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] - N[(c * N[(b * N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[(N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if c < -5.4999999999999998e122 or 1.35e15 < c

   1. Initial program 76.6%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 87.9%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y - c \cdot \left(i \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in a around 0 82.6%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y - c \cdot \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)}\right) \]

   if -5.4999999999999998e122 < c < 1.35e15

   1. Initial program 97.0%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in c around 0 75.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 77.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \leq -5.5 \cdot 10^{+122} \lor \neg \left(c \leq 1.35 \cdot 10^{+15}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y - c \cdot \left(b \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(z \cdot t + x \cdot y\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 74.5% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \leq -2.95 \cdot 10^{+35} \lor \neg \left(c \leq 1.5 \cdot 10^{+15}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;-2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(z \cdot t + x \cdot y\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= c -2.95e+35) (not (<= c 1.5e+15)))
   (* -2.0 (* c (* (+ a (* b c)) i)))
   (* 2.0 (+ (* z t) (* x y)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((c <= -2.95e+35) || !(c <= 1.5e+15)) {
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * ((a + (b * c)) * i));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * ((z * t) + (x * y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((c <= (-2.95d+35)) .or. (.not. (c <= 1.5d+15))) then
        tmp = (-2.0d0) * (c * ((a + (b * c)) * i))
    else
        tmp = 2.0d0 * ((z * t) + (x * y))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((c <= -2.95e+35) || !(c <= 1.5e+15)) {
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * ((a + (b * c)) * i));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * ((z * t) + (x * y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if (c <= -2.95e+35) or not (c <= 1.5e+15):
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * ((a + (b * c)) * i))
	else:
		tmp = 2.0 * ((z * t) + (x * y))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((c <= -2.95e+35) || !(c <= 1.5e+15))
		tmp = Float64(-2.0 * Float64(c * Float64(Float64(a + Float64(b * c)) * i)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(Float64(z * t) + Float64(x * y)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((c <= -2.95e+35) || ~((c <= 1.5e+15)))
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * ((a + (b * c)) * i));
	else
		tmp = 2.0 * ((z * t) + (x * y));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[c, -2.95e+35], N[Not[LessEqual[c, 1.5e+15]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(-2.0 * N[(c * N[(N[(a + N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[(N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if c < -2.94999999999999993e35 or 1.5e15 < c

   1. Initial program 77.9%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate--l+ 77.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + \left(z \cdot t - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 77.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{t \cdot z} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      3. associate--l+ 77.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot y + t \cdot z\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)} \]

      4. associate--l+ 77.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + \left(t \cdot z - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]

      5. *-commutative 77.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot t} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      6. associate--l+ 77.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)} \]

      7. fma-define 78.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      8. *-commutative 78.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

      9. associate-*l* 93.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

      10. +-commutative 93.4%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(b \cdot c + a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      11. fma-define 93.4%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 93.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in i around inf 71.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(i \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)\right)} \]

   if -2.94999999999999993e35 < c < 1.5e15

   1. Initial program 98.6%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in c around 0 78.7%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 75.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \leq -2.95 \cdot 10^{+35} \lor \neg \left(c \leq 1.5 \cdot 10^{+15}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;-2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(z \cdot t + x \cdot y\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 40.6% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := x \cdot \left(2 \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.46 \cdot 10^{-40}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 2.7 \cdot 10^{-121}:\\ \;\;\;\;-2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(b \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1.35 \cdot 10^{+72}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* x (* 2.0 y))))
   (if (<= y -1.46e-40)
     t_1
     (if (<= y 2.7e-121)
       (* -2.0 (* c (* b (* c i))))
       (if (<= y 1.35e+72) (* 2.0 (* z t)) t_1)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = x * (2.0 * y);
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -1.46e-40) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (y <= 2.7e-121) {
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * (b * (c * i)));
	} else if (y <= 1.35e+72) {
		tmp = 2.0 * (z * t);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = x * (2.0d0 * y)
    if (y <= (-1.46d-40)) then
        tmp = t_1
    else if (y <= 2.7d-121) then
        tmp = (-2.0d0) * (c * (b * (c * i)))
    else if (y <= 1.35d+72) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * (z * t)
    else
        tmp = t_1
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = x * (2.0 * y);
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -1.46e-40) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (y <= 2.7e-121) {
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * (b * (c * i)));
	} else if (y <= 1.35e+72) {
		tmp = 2.0 * (z * t);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	t_1 = x * (2.0 * y)
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -1.46e-40:
		tmp = t_1
	elif y <= 2.7e-121:
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * (b * (c * i)))
	elif y <= 1.35e+72:
		tmp = 2.0 * (z * t)
	else:
		tmp = t_1
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = Float64(x * Float64(2.0 * y))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -1.46e-40)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (y <= 2.7e-121)
		tmp = Float64(-2.0 * Float64(c * Float64(b * Float64(c * i))));
	elseif (y <= 1.35e+72)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(z * t));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = x * (2.0 * y);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -1.46e-40)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (y <= 2.7e-121)
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * (b * (c * i)));
	elseif (y <= 1.35e+72)
		tmp = 2.0 * (z * t);
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(x * N[(2.0 * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[y, -1.46e-40], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[y, 2.7e-121], N[(-2.0 * N[(c * N[(b * N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, 1.35e+72], N[(2.0 * N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if y < -1.46000000000000005e-40 or 1.35e72 < y

   1. Initial program 88.3%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate--l+ 88.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + \left(z \cdot t - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 88.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{t \cdot z} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      3. associate--l+ 88.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot y + t \cdot z\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)} \]

      4. associate--l+ 88.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + \left(t \cdot z - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]

      5. *-commutative 88.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot t} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      6. associate--l+ 88.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)} \]

      7. fma-define 89.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      8. *-commutative 89.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

      9. associate-*l* 91.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

      10. +-commutative 91.9%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(b \cdot c + a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      11. fma-define 91.9%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 91.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 53.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 53.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y\right) \cdot 2} \]

      2. associate-*l* 53.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y \cdot 2\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative 53.8%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot y\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 53.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(2 \cdot y\right)} \]

   if -1.46000000000000005e-40 < y < 2.7000000000000002e-121

   1. Initial program 93.1%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate--l+ 93.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + \left(z \cdot t - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 93.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{t \cdot z} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      3. associate--l+ 93.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot y + t \cdot z\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)} \]

      4. associate--l+ 93.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + \left(t \cdot z - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]

      5. *-commutative 93.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot t} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      6. associate--l+ 93.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)} \]

      7. fma-define 93.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      8. *-commutative 93.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

      9. associate-*l* 97.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

      10. +-commutative 97.5%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(b \cdot c + a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      11. fma-define 97.5%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 97.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in i around inf 59.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(i \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in a around 0 42.2%

      \[\leadsto -2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)}\right) \]

   if 2.7000000000000002e-121 < y < 1.35e72

   1. Initial program 87.7%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 55.1%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 50.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.46 \cdot 10^{-40}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(2 \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 2.7 \cdot 10^{-121}:\\ \;\;\;\;-2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(b \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1.35 \cdot 10^{+72}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(2 \cdot y\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 12: 69.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \leq -2.6 \cdot 10^{+131} \lor \neg \left(c \leq 4.2 \cdot 10^{+85}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;-2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(\left(b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(z \cdot t + x \cdot y\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= c -2.6e+131) (not (<= c 4.2e+85)))
   (* -2.0 (* c (* (* b c) i)))
   (* 2.0 (+ (* z t) (* x y)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((c <= -2.6e+131) || !(c <= 4.2e+85)) {
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * ((b * c) * i));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * ((z * t) + (x * y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((c <= (-2.6d+131)) .or. (.not. (c <= 4.2d+85))) then
        tmp = (-2.0d0) * (c * ((b * c) * i))
    else
        tmp = 2.0d0 * ((z * t) + (x * y))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((c <= -2.6e+131) || !(c <= 4.2e+85)) {
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * ((b * c) * i));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * ((z * t) + (x * y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if (c <= -2.6e+131) or not (c <= 4.2e+85):
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * ((b * c) * i))
	else:
		tmp = 2.0 * ((z * t) + (x * y))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((c <= -2.6e+131) || !(c <= 4.2e+85))
		tmp = Float64(-2.0 * Float64(c * Float64(Float64(b * c) * i)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(Float64(z * t) + Float64(x * y)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((c <= -2.6e+131) || ~((c <= 4.2e+85)))
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * ((b * c) * i));
	else
		tmp = 2.0 * ((z * t) + (x * y));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[c, -2.6e+131], N[Not[LessEqual[c, 4.2e+85]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(-2.0 * N[(c * N[(N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision] * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[(N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if c < -2.6e131 or 4.2000000000000002e85 < c

   1. Initial program 71.8%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate--l+ 71.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + \left(z \cdot t - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 71.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{t \cdot z} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      3. associate--l+ 71.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot y + t \cdot z\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)} \]

      4. associate--l+ 71.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + \left(t \cdot z - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]

      5. *-commutative 71.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot t} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      6. associate--l+ 71.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)} \]

      7. fma-define 73.2%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      8. *-commutative 73.2%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

      9. associate-*l* 91.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

      10. +-commutative 91.6%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(b \cdot c + a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      11. fma-define 91.6%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 91.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in i around inf 77.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(i \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in a around 0 74.6%

      \[\leadsto -2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(i \cdot \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot c\right)}\right)\right) \]

   if -2.6e131 < c < 4.2000000000000002e85

   1. Initial program 96.8%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in c around 0 72.4%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 73.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \leq -2.6 \cdot 10^{+131} \lor \neg \left(c \leq 4.2 \cdot 10^{+85}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;-2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(\left(b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(z \cdot t + x \cdot y\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 13: 39.7% accurate, 1.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -2.2 \cdot 10^{-52} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1.35 \cdot 10^{+72}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(2 \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -2.2e-52) (not (<= y 1.35e+72)))
   (* x (* 2.0 y))
   (* 2.0 (* z t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -2.2e-52) || !(y <= 1.35e+72)) {
		tmp = x * (2.0 * y);
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * (z * t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-2.2d-52)) .or. (.not. (y <= 1.35d+72))) then
        tmp = x * (2.0d0 * y)
    else
        tmp = 2.0d0 * (z * t)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -2.2e-52) || !(y <= 1.35e+72)) {
		tmp = x * (2.0 * y);
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * (z * t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -2.2e-52) or not (y <= 1.35e+72):
		tmp = x * (2.0 * y)
	else:
		tmp = 2.0 * (z * t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -2.2e-52) || !(y <= 1.35e+72))
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(2.0 * y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(z * t));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -2.2e-52) || ~((y <= 1.35e+72)))
		tmp = x * (2.0 * y);
	else
		tmp = 2.0 * (z * t);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -2.2e-52], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 1.35e+72]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[(2.0 * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -2.20000000000000009e-52 or 1.35e72 < y

   1. Initial program 88.1%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate--l+ 88.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + \left(z \cdot t - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 88.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{t \cdot z} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      3. associate--l+ 88.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot y + t \cdot z\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)} \]

      4. associate--l+ 88.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + \left(t \cdot z - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]

      5. *-commutative 88.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot t} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      6. associate--l+ 88.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)} \]

      7. fma-define 88.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      8. *-commutative 88.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

      9. associate-*l* 92.2%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

      10. +-commutative 92.2%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(b \cdot c + a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      11. fma-define 92.2%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 92.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 52.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 52.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y\right) \cdot 2} \]

      2. associate-*l* 52.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y \cdot 2\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative 52.4%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot y\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 52.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(2 \cdot y\right)} \]

   if -2.20000000000000009e-52 < y < 1.35e72

   1. Initial program 91.8%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 38.9%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 46.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -2.2 \cdot 10^{-52} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1.35 \cdot 10^{+72}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(2 \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 14: 29.1% accurate, 3.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 2 \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i) :precision binary64 (* 2.0 (* z t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return 2.0 * (z * t);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = 2.0d0 * (z * t)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return 2.0 * (z * t);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return 2.0 * (z * t)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(2.0 * Float64(z * t))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 2.0 * (z * t);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(2.0 * N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 89.8%

   \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 29.4%

   \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z\right)} \]

4. Final simplification 29.4%

   \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right) \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Developer Target 1: 94.1% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (* 2.0 (- (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* (+ a (* b c)) (* c i)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - ((a + (b * c)) * (c * i)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = 2.0d0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - ((a + (b * c)) * (c * i)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - ((a + (b * c)) * (c * i)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - ((a + (b * c)) * (c * i)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(2.0 * Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) - Float64(Float64(a + Float64(b * c)) * Float64(c * i))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - ((a + (b * c)) * (c * i)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(2.0 * N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(a + N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024135 
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
  :name "Diagrams.ThreeD.Shapes:frustum from diagrams-lib-1.3.0.3, A"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (! :herbie-platform default (* 2 (- (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* (+ a (* b c)) (* c i)))))

  (* 2.0 (- (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* (* (+ a (* b c)) c) i))))