Graphics.Rendering.Plot.Render.Plot.Legend:renderLegendOutside from plot-0.2.3.4, B

Percentage Accurate: 99.9% → 99.9%

Time: 7.9s

Alternatives: 14

Speedup: 1.0×

• 26.8% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (* x (+ (+ (+ (+ y z) z) y) t)) (* y 5.0)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x * ((((y + z) + z) + y) + t)) + (y * 5.0);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (x * ((((y + z) + z) + y) + t)) + (y * 5.0d0)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x * ((((y + z) + z) + y) + t)) + (y * 5.0);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (x * ((((y + z) + z) + y) + t)) + (y * 5.0)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(x * Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(y + z) + z) + y) + t)) + Float64(y * 5.0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (x * ((((y + z) + z) + y) + t)) + (y * 5.0);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(x * N[(N[(N[(N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision] + y), $MachinePrecision] + t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * 5.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (* x (+ (+ (+ (+ y z) z) y) t)) (* y 5.0)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x * ((((y + z) + z) + y) + t)) + (y * 5.0);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (x * ((((y + z) + z) + y) + t)) + (y * 5.0d0)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x * ((((y + z) + z) + y) + t)) + (y * 5.0);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (x * ((((y + z) + z) + y) + t)) + (y * 5.0)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(x * Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(y + z) + z) + y) + t)) + Float64(y * 5.0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (x * ((((y + z) + z) + y) + t)) + (y * 5.0);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(x * N[(N[(N[(N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision] + y), $MachinePrecision] + t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * 5.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.9% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2 \cdot \left(y + z\right) + t, y \cdot 5\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (fma x (+ (* 2.0 (+ y z)) t) (* y 5.0)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return fma(x, ((2.0 * (y + z)) + t), (y * 5.0));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return fma(x, Float64(Float64(2.0 * Float64(y + z)) + t), Float64(y * 5.0))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x * N[(N[(2.0 * N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + t), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * 5.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. fma-define 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t, y \cdot 5\right)} \]

   2. associate-+l+ 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{\left(\left(y + z\right) + \left(z + y\right)\right)} + t, y \cdot 5\right) \]

   3. +-commutative 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \left(\left(y + z\right) + \color{blue}{\left(y + z\right)}\right) + t, y \cdot 5\right) \]

   4. count-2 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)} + t, y \cdot 5\right) \]

3. Simplified 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2 \cdot \left(y + z\right) + t, y \cdot 5\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 99.9% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -2.9 \cdot 10^{-13} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 5 \cdot 10^{-18}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(t + \left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right) + 5 \cdot \frac{y}{x}\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 5 + x \cdot \left(t + 2 \cdot z\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -2.9e-13) (not (<= x 5e-18)))
   (* x (+ t (+ (* 2.0 (+ y z)) (* 5.0 (/ y x)))))
   (+ (* y 5.0) (* x (+ t (* 2.0 z))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -2.9e-13) || !(x <= 5e-18)) {
		tmp = x * (t + ((2.0 * (y + z)) + (5.0 * (y / x))));
	} else {
		tmp = (y * 5.0) + (x * (t + (2.0 * z)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-2.9d-13)) .or. (.not. (x <= 5d-18))) then
        tmp = x * (t + ((2.0d0 * (y + z)) + (5.0d0 * (y / x))))
    else
        tmp = (y * 5.0d0) + (x * (t + (2.0d0 * z)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -2.9e-13) || !(x <= 5e-18)) {
		tmp = x * (t + ((2.0 * (y + z)) + (5.0 * (y / x))));
	} else {
		tmp = (y * 5.0) + (x * (t + (2.0 * z)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -2.9e-13) or not (x <= 5e-18):
		tmp = x * (t + ((2.0 * (y + z)) + (5.0 * (y / x))))
	else:
		tmp = (y * 5.0) + (x * (t + (2.0 * z)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -2.9e-13) || !(x <= 5e-18))
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(t + Float64(Float64(2.0 * Float64(y + z)) + Float64(5.0 * Float64(y / x)))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(y * 5.0) + Float64(x * Float64(t + Float64(2.0 * z))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -2.9e-13) || ~((x <= 5e-18)))
		tmp = x * (t + ((2.0 * (y + z)) + (5.0 * (y / x))));
	else
		tmp = (y * 5.0) + (x * (t + (2.0 * z)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -2.9e-13], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 5e-18]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[(t + N[(N[(2.0 * N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(5.0 * N[(y / x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(y * 5.0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * N[(t + N[(2.0 * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -2.8999999999999998e-13 or 5.00000000000000036e-18 < x

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t, y \cdot 5\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{\left(\left(y + z\right) + \left(z + y\right)\right)} + t, y \cdot 5\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \left(\left(y + z\right) + \color{blue}{\left(y + z\right)}\right) + t, y \cdot 5\right) \]

      4. count-2 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)} + t, y \cdot 5\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2 \cdot \left(y + z\right) + t, y \cdot 5\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(t + \left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right) + 5 \cdot \frac{y}{x}\right)\right)} \]

   if -2.8999999999999998e-13 < x < 5.00000000000000036e-18

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot z} + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -2.9 \cdot 10^{-13} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 5 \cdot 10^{-18}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(t + \left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right) + 5 \cdot \frac{y}{x}\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 5 + x \cdot \left(t + 2 \cdot z\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 88.7% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := x \cdot \left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right) + t\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -3.6 \cdot 10^{-40}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 2.15 \cdot 10^{-155}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot 5\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 9.8 \cdot 10^{-36}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 5 + x \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* x (+ (* 2.0 (+ y z)) t))))
   (if (<= x -3.6e-40)
     t_1
     (if (<= x 2.15e-155)
       (+ (* 2.0 (* x z)) (* y 5.0))
       (if (<= x 9.8e-36) (+ (* y 5.0) (* x t)) t_1)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = x * ((2.0 * (y + z)) + t);
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -3.6e-40) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (x <= 2.15e-155) {
		tmp = (2.0 * (x * z)) + (y * 5.0);
	} else if (x <= 9.8e-36) {
		tmp = (y * 5.0) + (x * t);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = x * ((2.0d0 * (y + z)) + t)
    if (x <= (-3.6d-40)) then
        tmp = t_1
    else if (x <= 2.15d-155) then
        tmp = (2.0d0 * (x * z)) + (y * 5.0d0)
    else if (x <= 9.8d-36) then
        tmp = (y * 5.0d0) + (x * t)
    else
        tmp = t_1
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = x * ((2.0 * (y + z)) + t);
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -3.6e-40) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (x <= 2.15e-155) {
		tmp = (2.0 * (x * z)) + (y * 5.0);
	} else if (x <= 9.8e-36) {
		tmp = (y * 5.0) + (x * t);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	t_1 = x * ((2.0 * (y + z)) + t)
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -3.6e-40:
		tmp = t_1
	elif x <= 2.15e-155:
		tmp = (2.0 * (x * z)) + (y * 5.0)
	elif x <= 9.8e-36:
		tmp = (y * 5.0) + (x * t)
	else:
		tmp = t_1
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = Float64(x * Float64(Float64(2.0 * Float64(y + z)) + t))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -3.6e-40)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (x <= 2.15e-155)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(2.0 * Float64(x * z)) + Float64(y * 5.0));
	elseif (x <= 9.8e-36)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(y * 5.0) + Float64(x * t));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = x * ((2.0 * (y + z)) + t);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -3.6e-40)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (x <= 2.15e-155)
		tmp = (2.0 * (x * z)) + (y * 5.0);
	elseif (x <= 9.8e-36)
		tmp = (y * 5.0) + (x * t);
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(x * N[(N[(2.0 * N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[x, -3.6e-40], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[x, 2.15e-155], N[(N[(2.0 * N[(x * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * 5.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[x, 9.8e-36], N[(N[(y * 5.0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if x < -3.6e-40 or 9.7999999999999994e-36 < x

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t, y \cdot 5\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{\left(\left(y + z\right) + \left(z + y\right)\right)} + t, y \cdot 5\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \left(\left(y + z\right) + \color{blue}{\left(y + z\right)}\right) + t, y \cdot 5\right) \]

      4. count-2 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)} + t, y \cdot 5\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2 \cdot \left(y + z\right) + t, y \cdot 5\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 95.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(t + 2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right)} \]

   if -3.6e-40 < x < 2.15000000000000004e-155

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot z} + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]

   4. Taylor expanded in t around 0 84.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right) + 5 \cdot y} \]

   if 2.15000000000000004e-155 < x < 9.7999999999999994e-36

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.8%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot z} + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 91.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{5 \cdot y + t \cdot x} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 91.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -3.6 \cdot 10^{-40}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right) + t\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 2.15 \cdot 10^{-155}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot 5\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 9.8 \cdot 10^{-36}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 5 + x \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right) + t\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 67.1% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -8.2 \cdot 10^{+111}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(t + 2 \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -3.3 \cdot 10^{-102} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 6.8 \cdot 10^{-77}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(t + 2 \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 5\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -8.2e+111)
   (* x (+ t (* 2.0 y)))
   (if (or (<= x -3.3e-102) (not (<= x 6.8e-77)))
     (* x (+ t (* 2.0 z)))
     (* y 5.0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -8.2e+111) {
		tmp = x * (t + (2.0 * y));
	} else if ((x <= -3.3e-102) || !(x <= 6.8e-77)) {
		tmp = x * (t + (2.0 * z));
	} else {
		tmp = y * 5.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-8.2d+111)) then
        tmp = x * (t + (2.0d0 * y))
    else if ((x <= (-3.3d-102)) .or. (.not. (x <= 6.8d-77))) then
        tmp = x * (t + (2.0d0 * z))
    else
        tmp = y * 5.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -8.2e+111) {
		tmp = x * (t + (2.0 * y));
	} else if ((x <= -3.3e-102) || !(x <= 6.8e-77)) {
		tmp = x * (t + (2.0 * z));
	} else {
		tmp = y * 5.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -8.2e+111:
		tmp = x * (t + (2.0 * y))
	elif (x <= -3.3e-102) or not (x <= 6.8e-77):
		tmp = x * (t + (2.0 * z))
	else:
		tmp = y * 5.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -8.2e+111)
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(t + Float64(2.0 * y)));
	elseif ((x <= -3.3e-102) || !(x <= 6.8e-77))
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(t + Float64(2.0 * z)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(y * 5.0);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -8.2e+111)
		tmp = x * (t + (2.0 * y));
	elseif ((x <= -3.3e-102) || ~((x <= 6.8e-77)))
		tmp = x * (t + (2.0 * z));
	else
		tmp = y * 5.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[x, -8.2e+111], N[(x * N[(t + N[(2.0 * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[Or[LessEqual[x, -3.3e-102], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 6.8e-77]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[(t + N[(2.0 * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(y * 5.0), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if x < -8.19999999999999973e111

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t, y \cdot 5\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{\left(\left(y + z\right) + \left(z + y\right)\right)} + t, y \cdot 5\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \left(\left(y + z\right) + \color{blue}{\left(y + z\right)}\right) + t, y \cdot 5\right) \]

      4. count-2 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)} + t, y \cdot 5\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2 \cdot \left(y + z\right) + t, y \cdot 5\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(t + 2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around 0 82.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(t + 2 \cdot y\right)} \]

   if -8.19999999999999973e111 < x < -3.3e-102 or 6.79999999999999966e-77 < x

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 69.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(t + 2 \cdot z\right)} \]

   if -3.3e-102 < x < 6.79999999999999966e-77

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 65.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{5 \cdot y} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 69.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -8.2 \cdot 10^{+111}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(t + 2 \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -3.3 \cdot 10^{-102} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 6.8 \cdot 10^{-77}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(t + 2 \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 5\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 78.1% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := y \cdot \left(5 + x \cdot 2\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -500000:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 5.6 \cdot 10^{-28}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(t + 2 \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1.6 \cdot 10^{+64}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 5 + x \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* y (+ 5.0 (* x 2.0)))))
   (if (<= y -500000.0)
     t_1
     (if (<= y 5.6e-28)
       (* x (+ t (* 2.0 z)))
       (if (<= y 1.6e+64) (+ (* y 5.0) (* x t)) t_1)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = y * (5.0 + (x * 2.0));
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -500000.0) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (y <= 5.6e-28) {
		tmp = x * (t + (2.0 * z));
	} else if (y <= 1.6e+64) {
		tmp = (y * 5.0) + (x * t);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = y * (5.0d0 + (x * 2.0d0))
    if (y <= (-500000.0d0)) then
        tmp = t_1
    else if (y <= 5.6d-28) then
        tmp = x * (t + (2.0d0 * z))
    else if (y <= 1.6d+64) then
        tmp = (y * 5.0d0) + (x * t)
    else
        tmp = t_1
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = y * (5.0 + (x * 2.0));
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -500000.0) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (y <= 5.6e-28) {
		tmp = x * (t + (2.0 * z));
	} else if (y <= 1.6e+64) {
		tmp = (y * 5.0) + (x * t);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	t_1 = y * (5.0 + (x * 2.0))
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -500000.0:
		tmp = t_1
	elif y <= 5.6e-28:
		tmp = x * (t + (2.0 * z))
	elif y <= 1.6e+64:
		tmp = (y * 5.0) + (x * t)
	else:
		tmp = t_1
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = Float64(y * Float64(5.0 + Float64(x * 2.0)))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -500000.0)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (y <= 5.6e-28)
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(t + Float64(2.0 * z)));
	elseif (y <= 1.6e+64)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(y * 5.0) + Float64(x * t));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = y * (5.0 + (x * 2.0));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -500000.0)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (y <= 5.6e-28)
		tmp = x * (t + (2.0 * z));
	elseif (y <= 1.6e+64)
		tmp = (y * 5.0) + (x * t);
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(y * N[(5.0 + N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[y, -500000.0], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[y, 5.6e-28], N[(x * N[(t + N[(2.0 * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, 1.6e+64], N[(N[(y * 5.0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if y < -5e5 or 1.60000000000000009e64 < y

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 79.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(5 + 2 \cdot x\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 79.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(5 + x \cdot 2\right)} \]

   if -5e5 < y < 5.5999999999999996e-28

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 85.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(t + 2 \cdot z\right)} \]

   if 5.5999999999999996e-28 < y < 1.60000000000000009e64

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 93.1%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot z} + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 72.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{5 \cdot y + t \cdot x} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 80.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -500000:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(5 + x \cdot 2\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 5.6 \cdot 10^{-28}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(t + 2 \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1.6 \cdot 10^{+64}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 5 + x \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(5 + x \cdot 2\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 58.3% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := x \cdot \left(t + 2 \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -2.4 \cdot 10^{+94}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq -4.3 \cdot 10^{-106}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 5\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 1.05 \cdot 10^{+30}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* x (+ t (* 2.0 y)))))
   (if (<= t -2.4e+94)
     t_1
     (if (<= t -4.3e-106)
       (* y 5.0)
       (if (<= t 1.05e+30) (* x (* 2.0 (+ y z))) t_1)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = x * (t + (2.0 * y));
	double tmp;
	if (t <= -2.4e+94) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (t <= -4.3e-106) {
		tmp = y * 5.0;
	} else if (t <= 1.05e+30) {
		tmp = x * (2.0 * (y + z));
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = x * (t + (2.0d0 * y))
    if (t <= (-2.4d+94)) then
        tmp = t_1
    else if (t <= (-4.3d-106)) then
        tmp = y * 5.0d0
    else if (t <= 1.05d+30) then
        tmp = x * (2.0d0 * (y + z))
    else
        tmp = t_1
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = x * (t + (2.0 * y));
	double tmp;
	if (t <= -2.4e+94) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (t <= -4.3e-106) {
		tmp = y * 5.0;
	} else if (t <= 1.05e+30) {
		tmp = x * (2.0 * (y + z));
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	t_1 = x * (t + (2.0 * y))
	tmp = 0
	if t <= -2.4e+94:
		tmp = t_1
	elif t <= -4.3e-106:
		tmp = y * 5.0
	elif t <= 1.05e+30:
		tmp = x * (2.0 * (y + z))
	else:
		tmp = t_1
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = Float64(x * Float64(t + Float64(2.0 * y)))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t <= -2.4e+94)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (t <= -4.3e-106)
		tmp = Float64(y * 5.0);
	elseif (t <= 1.05e+30)
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(2.0 * Float64(y + z)));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = x * (t + (2.0 * y));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t <= -2.4e+94)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (t <= -4.3e-106)
		tmp = y * 5.0;
	elseif (t <= 1.05e+30)
		tmp = x * (2.0 * (y + z));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(x * N[(t + N[(2.0 * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t, -2.4e+94], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[t, -4.3e-106], N[(y * 5.0), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[t, 1.05e+30], N[(x * N[(2.0 * N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if t < -2.39999999999999983e94 or 1.05e30 < t

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t, y \cdot 5\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{\left(\left(y + z\right) + \left(z + y\right)\right)} + t, y \cdot 5\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \left(\left(y + z\right) + \color{blue}{\left(y + z\right)}\right) + t, y \cdot 5\right) \]

      4. count-2 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)} + t, y \cdot 5\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2 \cdot \left(y + z\right) + t, y \cdot 5\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 72.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(t + 2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around 0 63.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(t + 2 \cdot y\right)} \]

   if -2.39999999999999983e94 < t < -4.3000000000000002e-106

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 56.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{5 \cdot y} \]

   if -4.3000000000000002e-106 < t < 1.05e30

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t, y \cdot 5\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{\left(\left(y + z\right) + \left(z + y\right)\right)} + t, y \cdot 5\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \left(\left(y + z\right) + \color{blue}{\left(y + z\right)}\right) + t, y \cdot 5\right) \]

      4. count-2 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)} + t, y \cdot 5\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2 \cdot \left(y + z\right) + t, y \cdot 5\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 74.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(t + 2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around 0 73.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 73.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot x\right) \cdot \left(y + z\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 73.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2\right)} \cdot \left(y + z\right) \]

      3. associate-*r* 73.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right)} \]

   8. Simplified 73.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 66.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -2.4 \cdot 10^{+94}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(t + 2 \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq -4.3 \cdot 10^{-106}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 5\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 1.05 \cdot 10^{+30}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(t + 2 \cdot y\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 99.2% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -2.5 \lor \neg \left(x \leq 0.000175\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right) + t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 5 + x \cdot \left(t + 2 \cdot z\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -2.5) (not (<= x 0.000175)))
   (* x (+ (* 2.0 (+ y z)) t))
   (+ (* y 5.0) (* x (+ t (* 2.0 z))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -2.5) || !(x <= 0.000175)) {
		tmp = x * ((2.0 * (y + z)) + t);
	} else {
		tmp = (y * 5.0) + (x * (t + (2.0 * z)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-2.5d0)) .or. (.not. (x <= 0.000175d0))) then
        tmp = x * ((2.0d0 * (y + z)) + t)
    else
        tmp = (y * 5.0d0) + (x * (t + (2.0d0 * z)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -2.5) || !(x <= 0.000175)) {
		tmp = x * ((2.0 * (y + z)) + t);
	} else {
		tmp = (y * 5.0) + (x * (t + (2.0 * z)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -2.5) or not (x <= 0.000175):
		tmp = x * ((2.0 * (y + z)) + t)
	else:
		tmp = (y * 5.0) + (x * (t + (2.0 * z)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -2.5) || !(x <= 0.000175))
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(Float64(2.0 * Float64(y + z)) + t));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(y * 5.0) + Float64(x * Float64(t + Float64(2.0 * z))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -2.5) || ~((x <= 0.000175)))
		tmp = x * ((2.0 * (y + z)) + t);
	else
		tmp = (y * 5.0) + (x * (t + (2.0 * z)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -2.5], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 0.000175]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[(N[(2.0 * N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(y * 5.0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * N[(t + N[(2.0 * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -2.5 or 1.74999999999999998e-4 < x

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t, y \cdot 5\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{\left(\left(y + z\right) + \left(z + y\right)\right)} + t, y \cdot 5\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \left(\left(y + z\right) + \color{blue}{\left(y + z\right)}\right) + t, y \cdot 5\right) \]

      4. count-2 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)} + t, y \cdot 5\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2 \cdot \left(y + z\right) + t, y \cdot 5\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 98.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(t + 2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right)} \]

   if -2.5 < x < 1.74999999999999998e-4

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.3%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot z} + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -2.5 \lor \neg \left(x \leq 0.000175\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right) + t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 5 + x \cdot \left(t + 2 \cdot z\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 44.9% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -9 \cdot 10^{+180}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq -4.5 \cdot 10^{-106}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 5\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 1.4 \cdot 10^{+113}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= t -9e+180)
   (* x t)
   (if (<= t -4.5e-106)
     (* y 5.0)
     (if (<= t 1.4e+113) (* 2.0 (* x z)) (* x t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (t <= -9e+180) {
		tmp = x * t;
	} else if (t <= -4.5e-106) {
		tmp = y * 5.0;
	} else if (t <= 1.4e+113) {
		tmp = 2.0 * (x * z);
	} else {
		tmp = x * t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (t <= (-9d+180)) then
        tmp = x * t
    else if (t <= (-4.5d-106)) then
        tmp = y * 5.0d0
    else if (t <= 1.4d+113) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * (x * z)
    else
        tmp = x * t
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (t <= -9e+180) {
		tmp = x * t;
	} else if (t <= -4.5e-106) {
		tmp = y * 5.0;
	} else if (t <= 1.4e+113) {
		tmp = 2.0 * (x * z);
	} else {
		tmp = x * t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if t <= -9e+180:
		tmp = x * t
	elif t <= -4.5e-106:
		tmp = y * 5.0
	elif t <= 1.4e+113:
		tmp = 2.0 * (x * z)
	else:
		tmp = x * t
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t <= -9e+180)
		tmp = Float64(x * t);
	elseif (t <= -4.5e-106)
		tmp = Float64(y * 5.0);
	elseif (t <= 1.4e+113)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(x * z));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * t);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t <= -9e+180)
		tmp = x * t;
	elseif (t <= -4.5e-106)
		tmp = y * 5.0;
	elseif (t <= 1.4e+113)
		tmp = 2.0 * (x * z);
	else
		tmp = x * t;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[t, -9e+180], N[(x * t), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[t, -4.5e-106], N[(y * 5.0), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[t, 1.4e+113], N[(2.0 * N[(x * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * t), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if t < -8.99999999999999962e180 or 1.39999999999999999e113 < t

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around inf 68.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot x} \]

   5. Simplified 68.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot t} \]

   if -8.99999999999999962e180 < t < -4.49999999999999955e-106

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 51.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{5 \cdot y} \]

   if -4.49999999999999955e-106 < t < 1.39999999999999999e113

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 44.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 53.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -9 \cdot 10^{+180}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq -4.5 \cdot 10^{-106}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 5\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 1.4 \cdot 10^{+113}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot t\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 88.4% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.3 \cdot 10^{-41} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1.42 \cdot 10^{-37}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right) + t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 5 + x \cdot t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -1.3e-41) (not (<= x 1.42e-37)))
   (* x (+ (* 2.0 (+ y z)) t))
   (+ (* y 5.0) (* x t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.3e-41) || !(x <= 1.42e-37)) {
		tmp = x * ((2.0 * (y + z)) + t);
	} else {
		tmp = (y * 5.0) + (x * t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-1.3d-41)) .or. (.not. (x <= 1.42d-37))) then
        tmp = x * ((2.0d0 * (y + z)) + t)
    else
        tmp = (y * 5.0d0) + (x * t)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.3e-41) || !(x <= 1.42e-37)) {
		tmp = x * ((2.0 * (y + z)) + t);
	} else {
		tmp = (y * 5.0) + (x * t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -1.3e-41) or not (x <= 1.42e-37):
		tmp = x * ((2.0 * (y + z)) + t)
	else:
		tmp = (y * 5.0) + (x * t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -1.3e-41) || !(x <= 1.42e-37))
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(Float64(2.0 * Float64(y + z)) + t));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(y * 5.0) + Float64(x * t));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -1.3e-41) || ~((x <= 1.42e-37)))
		tmp = x * ((2.0 * (y + z)) + t);
	else
		tmp = (y * 5.0) + (x * t);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -1.3e-41], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 1.42e-37]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[(N[(2.0 * N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(y * 5.0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -1.3e-41 or 1.42e-37 < x

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t, y \cdot 5\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{\left(\left(y + z\right) + \left(z + y\right)\right)} + t, y \cdot 5\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \left(\left(y + z\right) + \color{blue}{\left(y + z\right)}\right) + t, y \cdot 5\right) \]

      4. count-2 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)} + t, y \cdot 5\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2 \cdot \left(y + z\right) + t, y \cdot 5\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 95.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(t + 2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right)} \]

   if -1.3e-41 < x < 1.42e-37

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot z} + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 81.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{5 \cdot y + t \cdot x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 88.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.3 \cdot 10^{-41} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1.42 \cdot 10^{-37}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right) + t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 5 + x \cdot t\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 77.7% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -510000 \lor \neg \left(y \leq 7.5 \cdot 10^{+61}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(5 + x \cdot 2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(t + 2 \cdot z\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -510000.0) (not (<= y 7.5e+61)))
   (* y (+ 5.0 (* x 2.0)))
   (* x (+ t (* 2.0 z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -510000.0) || !(y <= 7.5e+61)) {
		tmp = y * (5.0 + (x * 2.0));
	} else {
		tmp = x * (t + (2.0 * z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-510000.0d0)) .or. (.not. (y <= 7.5d+61))) then
        tmp = y * (5.0d0 + (x * 2.0d0))
    else
        tmp = x * (t + (2.0d0 * z))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -510000.0) || !(y <= 7.5e+61)) {
		tmp = y * (5.0 + (x * 2.0));
	} else {
		tmp = x * (t + (2.0 * z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -510000.0) or not (y <= 7.5e+61):
		tmp = y * (5.0 + (x * 2.0))
	else:
		tmp = x * (t + (2.0 * z))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -510000.0) || !(y <= 7.5e+61))
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(5.0 + Float64(x * 2.0)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(t + Float64(2.0 * z)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -510000.0) || ~((y <= 7.5e+61)))
		tmp = y * (5.0 + (x * 2.0));
	else
		tmp = x * (t + (2.0 * z));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -510000.0], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 7.5e+61]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * N[(5.0 + N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * N[(t + N[(2.0 * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -5.1e5 or 7.5e61 < y

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 79.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(5 + 2 \cdot x\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 79.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(5 + x \cdot 2\right)} \]

   if -5.1e5 < y < 7.5e61

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 79.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(t + 2 \cdot z\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 79.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -510000 \lor \neg \left(y \leq 7.5 \cdot 10^{+61}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(5 + x \cdot 2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(t + 2 \cdot z\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 63.3% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -2.2 \cdot 10^{-41} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1.8 \cdot 10^{-34}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 5\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -2.2e-41) (not (<= x 1.8e-34)))
   (* x (* 2.0 (+ y z)))
   (* y 5.0)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -2.2e-41) || !(x <= 1.8e-34)) {
		tmp = x * (2.0 * (y + z));
	} else {
		tmp = y * 5.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-2.2d-41)) .or. (.not. (x <= 1.8d-34))) then
        tmp = x * (2.0d0 * (y + z))
    else
        tmp = y * 5.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -2.2e-41) || !(x <= 1.8e-34)) {
		tmp = x * (2.0 * (y + z));
	} else {
		tmp = y * 5.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -2.2e-41) or not (x <= 1.8e-34):
		tmp = x * (2.0 * (y + z))
	else:
		tmp = y * 5.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -2.2e-41) || !(x <= 1.8e-34))
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(2.0 * Float64(y + z)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(y * 5.0);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -2.2e-41) || ~((x <= 1.8e-34)))
		tmp = x * (2.0 * (y + z));
	else
		tmp = y * 5.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -2.2e-41], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 1.8e-34]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[(2.0 * N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(y * 5.0), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -2.2e-41 or 1.80000000000000004e-34 < x

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t, y \cdot 5\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{\left(\left(y + z\right) + \left(z + y\right)\right)} + t, y \cdot 5\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \left(\left(y + z\right) + \color{blue}{\left(y + z\right)}\right) + t, y \cdot 5\right) \]

      4. count-2 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)} + t, y \cdot 5\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2 \cdot \left(y + z\right) + t, y \cdot 5\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 95.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(t + 2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around 0 66.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 66.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot x\right) \cdot \left(y + z\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 66.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2\right)} \cdot \left(y + z\right) \]

      3. associate-*r* 66.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right)} \]

   8. Simplified 66.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right)} \]

   if -2.2e-41 < x < 1.80000000000000004e-34

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 60.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{5 \cdot y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 63.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -2.2 \cdot 10^{-41} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1.8 \cdot 10^{-34}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 5\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 12: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot \left(t + \left(y + \left(z + \left(y + z\right)\right)\right)\right) + y \cdot 5 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (* x (+ t (+ y (+ z (+ y z))))) (* y 5.0)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x * (t + (y + (z + (y + z))))) + (y * 5.0);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (x * (t + (y + (z + (y + z))))) + (y * 5.0d0)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x * (t + (y + (z + (y + z))))) + (y * 5.0);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (x * (t + (y + (z + (y + z))))) + (y * 5.0)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(x * Float64(t + Float64(y + Float64(z + Float64(y + z))))) + Float64(y * 5.0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (x * (t + (y + (z + (y + z))))) + (y * 5.0);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(x * N[(t + N[(y + N[(z + N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * 5.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(t + \left(y + \left(z + \left(y + z\right)\right)\right)\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 13: 47.6% accurate, 1.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -7.2 \cdot 10^{-42} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 2.85 \cdot 10^{-74}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 5\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -7.2e-42) (not (<= x 2.85e-74))) (* x t) (* y 5.0)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -7.2e-42) || !(x <= 2.85e-74)) {
		tmp = x * t;
	} else {
		tmp = y * 5.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-7.2d-42)) .or. (.not. (x <= 2.85d-74))) then
        tmp = x * t
    else
        tmp = y * 5.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -7.2e-42) || !(x <= 2.85e-74)) {
		tmp = x * t;
	} else {
		tmp = y * 5.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -7.2e-42) or not (x <= 2.85e-74):
		tmp = x * t
	else:
		tmp = y * 5.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -7.2e-42) || !(x <= 2.85e-74))
		tmp = Float64(x * t);
	else
		tmp = Float64(y * 5.0);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -7.2e-42) || ~((x <= 2.85e-74)))
		tmp = x * t;
	else
		tmp = y * 5.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -7.2e-42], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 2.85e-74]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * t), $MachinePrecision], N[(y * 5.0), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -7.2000000000000004e-42 or 2.85000000000000012e-74 < x

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around inf 38.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot x} \]

   5. Simplified 38.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot t} \]

   if -7.2000000000000004e-42 < x < 2.85000000000000012e-74

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 63.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{5 \cdot y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 49.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -7.2 \cdot 10^{-42} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 2.85 \cdot 10^{-74}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 5\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 14: 29.9% accurate, 5.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ y \cdot 5 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (* y 5.0))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return y * 5.0;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = y * 5.0d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return y * 5.0;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return y * 5.0

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(y * 5.0)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = y * 5.0;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(y * 5.0), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 30.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{5 \cdot y} \]

4. Final simplification 30.6%

   \[\leadsto y \cdot 5 \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024135 
(FPCore (x y z t)
  :name "Graphics.Rendering.Plot.Render.Plot.Legend:renderLegendOutside from plot-0.2.3.4, B"
  :precision binary64
  (+ (* x (+ (+ (+ (+ y z) z) y) t)) (* y 5.0)))