Linear.V4:$cdot from linear-1.19.1.3, C

Percentage Accurate: 95.5% → 98.3%

Time: 10.7s

Alternatives: 16

Speedup: 0.4×

• 41.4% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (+ (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* a b)) (* c i)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) + Float64(a * b)) + Float64(c * i))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 95.5% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (+ (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* a b)) (* c i)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) + Float64(a * b)) + Float64(c * i))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 98.3% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := c \cdot i + \left(a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_1 \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot \left(a + \left(c \cdot \frac{i}{b} + \left(t \cdot \frac{z}{b} + x \cdot \frac{y}{b}\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ (* c i) (+ (* a b) (+ (* x y) (* z t))))))
   (if (<= t_1 INFINITY)
     t_1
     (* b (+ a (+ (* c (/ i b)) (+ (* t (/ z b)) (* x (/ y b)))))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = (c * i) + ((a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t)));
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= ((double) INFINITY)) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = b * (a + ((c * (i / b)) + ((t * (z / b)) + (x * (y / b)))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = (c * i) + ((a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t)));
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= Double.POSITIVE_INFINITY) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = b * (a + ((c * (i / b)) + ((t * (z / b)) + (x * (y / b)))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	t_1 = (c * i) + ((a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t)))
	tmp = 0
	if t_1 <= math.inf:
		tmp = t_1
	else:
		tmp = b * (a + ((c * (i / b)) + ((t * (z / b)) + (x * (y / b)))))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(c * i) + Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t))))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_1 <= Inf)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = Float64(b * Float64(a + Float64(Float64(c * Float64(i / b)) + Float64(Float64(t * Float64(z / b)) + Float64(x * Float64(y / b))))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = (c * i) + ((a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t)));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t_1 <= Inf)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = b * (a + ((c * (i / b)) + ((t * (z / b)) + (x * (y / b)))));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$1, Infinity], t$95$1, N[(b * N[(a + N[(N[(c * N[(i / b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(t * N[(z / b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * N[(y / b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (+.f64 (+.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (*.f64 z t)) (*.f64 a b)) (*.f64 c i)) < +inf.0

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   if +inf.0 < (+.f64 (+.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (*.f64 z t)) (*.f64 a b)) (*.f64 c i))

   1. Initial program 0.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 0.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 15.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 15.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 30.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 38.5%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 38.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in b around inf 30.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot \left(a + \left(\frac{c \cdot i}{b} + \left(\frac{t \cdot z}{b} + \frac{x \cdot y}{b}\right)\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 46.2%

         \[\leadsto b \cdot \left(a + \left(\color{blue}{c \cdot \frac{i}{b}} + \left(\frac{t \cdot z}{b} + \frac{x \cdot y}{b}\right)\right)\right) \]

      2. associate-/l* 53.8%

         \[\leadsto b \cdot \left(a + \left(c \cdot \frac{i}{b} + \left(\color{blue}{t \cdot \frac{z}{b}} + \frac{x \cdot y}{b}\right)\right)\right) \]

      3. associate-/l* 69.2%

         \[\leadsto b \cdot \left(a + \left(c \cdot \frac{i}{b} + \left(t \cdot \frac{z}{b} + \color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{y}{b}}\right)\right)\right) \]

   7. Simplified 69.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot \left(a + \left(c \cdot \frac{i}{b} + \left(t \cdot \frac{z}{b} + x \cdot \frac{y}{b}\right)\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot i + \left(a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\right) \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + \left(a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot \left(a + \left(c \cdot \frac{i}{b} + \left(t \cdot \frac{z}{b} + x \cdot \frac{y}{b}\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 97.6% accurate, 0.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (fma c i (fma a b (fma x y (* z t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return fma(c, i, fma(a, b, fma(x, y, (z * t))));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return fma(c, i, fma(a, b, fma(x, y, Float64(z * t))))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(c * i + N[(a * b + N[(x * y + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 94.9%

   \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 94.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

   2. fma-define 95.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. +-commutative 95.7%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

   4. fma-define 96.5%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

   5. fma-define 96.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

3. Simplified 96.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 65.6% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := c \cdot i + z \cdot t\\ t_2 := x \cdot y + a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -7.6 \cdot 10^{+34}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq -2.35 \cdot 10^{-209}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 1.8 \cdot 10^{+27}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 2.45 \cdot 10^{+67}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ (* c i) (* z t))) (t_2 (+ (* x y) (* a b))))
   (if (<= (* x y) -7.6e+34)
     t_2
     (if (<= (* x y) -2.35e-209)
       t_1
       (if (<= (* x y) 1.8e+27)
         (+ (* a b) (* z t))
         (if (<= (* x y) 2.45e+67) t_1 t_2))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = (c * i) + (z * t);
	double t_2 = (x * y) + (a * b);
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -7.6e+34) {
		tmp = t_2;
	} else if ((x * y) <= -2.35e-209) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if ((x * y) <= 1.8e+27) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	} else if ((x * y) <= 2.45e+67) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = t_2;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: t_2
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = (c * i) + (z * t)
    t_2 = (x * y) + (a * b)
    if ((x * y) <= (-7.6d+34)) then
        tmp = t_2
    else if ((x * y) <= (-2.35d-209)) then
        tmp = t_1
    else if ((x * y) <= 1.8d+27) then
        tmp = (a * b) + (z * t)
    else if ((x * y) <= 2.45d+67) then
        tmp = t_1
    else
        tmp = t_2
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = (c * i) + (z * t);
	double t_2 = (x * y) + (a * b);
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -7.6e+34) {
		tmp = t_2;
	} else if ((x * y) <= -2.35e-209) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if ((x * y) <= 1.8e+27) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	} else if ((x * y) <= 2.45e+67) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = t_2;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	t_1 = (c * i) + (z * t)
	t_2 = (x * y) + (a * b)
	tmp = 0
	if (x * y) <= -7.6e+34:
		tmp = t_2
	elif (x * y) <= -2.35e-209:
		tmp = t_1
	elif (x * y) <= 1.8e+27:
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t)
	elif (x * y) <= 2.45e+67:
		tmp = t_1
	else:
		tmp = t_2
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(c * i) + Float64(z * t))
	t_2 = Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(a * b))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(x * y) <= -7.6e+34)
		tmp = t_2;
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= -2.35e-209)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= 1.8e+27)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(z * t));
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= 2.45e+67)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = t_2;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = (c * i) + (z * t);
	t_2 = (x * y) + (a * b);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x * y) <= -7.6e+34)
		tmp = t_2;
	elseif ((x * y) <= -2.35e-209)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif ((x * y) <= 1.8e+27)
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	elseif ((x * y) <= 2.45e+67)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = t_2;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -7.6e+34], t$95$2, If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -2.35e-209], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 1.8e+27], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 2.45e+67], t$95$1, t$95$2]]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -7.6000000000000003e34 or 2.44999999999999995e67 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 92.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 92.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 93.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 93.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 94.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 95.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 95.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in c around 0 87.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around 0 79.1%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]

   if -7.6000000000000003e34 < (*.f64 x y) < -2.35e-209 or 1.79999999999999991e27 < (*.f64 x y) < 2.44999999999999995e67

   1. Initial program 94.7%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 94.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 94.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 94.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 96.5%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 96.5%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 96.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around 0 81.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around inf 73.2%

      \[\leadsto c \cdot i + \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]

   if -2.35e-209 < (*.f64 x y) < 1.79999999999999991e27

   1. Initial program 97.7%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 97.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 98.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 98.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 98.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 98.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 98.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in c around 0 82.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around inf 77.9%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 77.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -7.6 \cdot 10^{+34}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq -2.35 \cdot 10^{-209}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 1.8 \cdot 10^{+27}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 2.45 \cdot 10^{+67}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + a \cdot b\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 59.8% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := a \cdot b + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -1.95 \cdot 10^{+64}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq -2.6 \cdot 10^{-32}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq -9 \cdot 10^{-128}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 1.38 \cdot 10^{+91}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ (* a b) (* z t))))
   (if (<= (* x y) -1.95e+64)
     (* x y)
     (if (<= (* x y) -2.6e-32)
       t_1
       (if (<= (* x y) -9e-128)
         (+ (* a b) (* c i))
         (if (<= (* x y) 1.38e+91) t_1 (* x y)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = (a * b) + (z * t);
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -1.95e+64) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else if ((x * y) <= -2.6e-32) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if ((x * y) <= -9e-128) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i);
	} else if ((x * y) <= 1.38e+91) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = x * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = (a * b) + (z * t)
    if ((x * y) <= (-1.95d+64)) then
        tmp = x * y
    else if ((x * y) <= (-2.6d-32)) then
        tmp = t_1
    else if ((x * y) <= (-9d-128)) then
        tmp = (a * b) + (c * i)
    else if ((x * y) <= 1.38d+91) then
        tmp = t_1
    else
        tmp = x * y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = (a * b) + (z * t);
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -1.95e+64) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else if ((x * y) <= -2.6e-32) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if ((x * y) <= -9e-128) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i);
	} else if ((x * y) <= 1.38e+91) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = x * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	t_1 = (a * b) + (z * t)
	tmp = 0
	if (x * y) <= -1.95e+64:
		tmp = x * y
	elif (x * y) <= -2.6e-32:
		tmp = t_1
	elif (x * y) <= -9e-128:
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i)
	elif (x * y) <= 1.38e+91:
		tmp = t_1
	else:
		tmp = x * y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(z * t))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(x * y) <= -1.95e+64)
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= -2.6e-32)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= -9e-128)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(c * i));
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= 1.38e+91)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = (a * b) + (z * t);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x * y) <= -1.95e+64)
		tmp = x * y;
	elseif ((x * y) <= -2.6e-32)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif ((x * y) <= -9e-128)
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i);
	elseif ((x * y) <= 1.38e+91)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = x * y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -1.95e+64], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -2.6e-32], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -9e-128], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 1.38e+91], t$95$1, N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -1.9499999999999999e64 or 1.37999999999999991e91 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 92.3%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 92.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 93.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 93.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 94.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 95.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 95.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in c around 0 86.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around 0 80.1%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in a around 0 71.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]

   if -1.9499999999999999e64 < (*.f64 x y) < -2.5999999999999997e-32 or -8.9999999999999998e-128 < (*.f64 x y) < 1.37999999999999991e91

   1. Initial program 97.7%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 97.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 98.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 98.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 99.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 99.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in c around 0 79.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around inf 70.6%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]

   if -2.5999999999999997e-32 < (*.f64 x y) < -8.9999999999999998e-128

   1. Initial program 90.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 90.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 90.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right) \]

   3. Simplified 90.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 82.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around 0 74.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + c \cdot i} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 71.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -1.95 \cdot 10^{+64}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq -2.6 \cdot 10^{-32}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq -9 \cdot 10^{-128}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 1.38 \cdot 10^{+91}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 97.0% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := c \cdot i + \left(a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_1 \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ (* c i) (+ (* a b) (+ (* x y) (* z t))))))
   (if (<= t_1 INFINITY) t_1 (* c i))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = (c * i) + ((a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t)));
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= ((double) INFINITY)) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = c * i;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = (c * i) + ((a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t)));
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= Double.POSITIVE_INFINITY) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = c * i;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	t_1 = (c * i) + ((a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t)))
	tmp = 0
	if t_1 <= math.inf:
		tmp = t_1
	else:
		tmp = c * i
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(c * i) + Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t))))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_1 <= Inf)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = Float64(c * i);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = (c * i) + ((a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t)));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t_1 <= Inf)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = c * i;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$1, Infinity], t$95$1, N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (+.f64 (+.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (*.f64 z t)) (*.f64 a b)) (*.f64 c i)) < +inf.0

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   if +inf.0 < (+.f64 (+.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (*.f64 z t)) (*.f64 a b)) (*.f64 c i))

   1. Initial program 0.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 0.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 15.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 15.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 30.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 38.5%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 38.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in c around inf 46.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 97.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot i + \left(a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\right) \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + \left(a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 41.9% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -1.72 \cdot 10^{-12}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq -4.6 \cdot 10^{-125}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 2.95 \cdot 10^{-235}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 1.85 \cdot 10^{+89}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* x y) -1.72e-12)
   (* x y)
   (if (<= (* x y) -4.6e-125)
     (* c i)
     (if (<= (* x y) 2.95e-235)
       (* z t)
       (if (<= (* x y) 1.85e+89) (* a b) (* x y))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -1.72e-12) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else if ((x * y) <= -4.6e-125) {
		tmp = c * i;
	} else if ((x * y) <= 2.95e-235) {
		tmp = z * t;
	} else if ((x * y) <= 1.85e+89) {
		tmp = a * b;
	} else {
		tmp = x * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x * y) <= (-1.72d-12)) then
        tmp = x * y
    else if ((x * y) <= (-4.6d-125)) then
        tmp = c * i
    else if ((x * y) <= 2.95d-235) then
        tmp = z * t
    else if ((x * y) <= 1.85d+89) then
        tmp = a * b
    else
        tmp = x * y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -1.72e-12) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else if ((x * y) <= -4.6e-125) {
		tmp = c * i;
	} else if ((x * y) <= 2.95e-235) {
		tmp = z * t;
	} else if ((x * y) <= 1.85e+89) {
		tmp = a * b;
	} else {
		tmp = x * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if (x * y) <= -1.72e-12:
		tmp = x * y
	elif (x * y) <= -4.6e-125:
		tmp = c * i
	elif (x * y) <= 2.95e-235:
		tmp = z * t
	elif (x * y) <= 1.85e+89:
		tmp = a * b
	else:
		tmp = x * y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(x * y) <= -1.72e-12)
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= -4.6e-125)
		tmp = Float64(c * i);
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= 2.95e-235)
		tmp = Float64(z * t);
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= 1.85e+89)
		tmp = Float64(a * b);
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x * y) <= -1.72e-12)
		tmp = x * y;
	elseif ((x * y) <= -4.6e-125)
		tmp = c * i;
	elseif ((x * y) <= 2.95e-235)
		tmp = z * t;
	elseif ((x * y) <= 1.85e+89)
		tmp = a * b;
	else
		tmp = x * y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -1.72e-12], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -4.6e-125], N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 2.95e-235], N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 1.85e+89], N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 4 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -1.7199999999999999e-12 or 1.8499999999999999e89 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 93.3%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 93.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 94.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 94.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 95.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 95.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 95.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in c around 0 87.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around 0 77.1%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in a around 0 66.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]

   if -1.7199999999999999e-12 < (*.f64 x y) < -4.5999999999999998e-125

   1. Initial program 92.6%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 92.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 92.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 92.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 92.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 92.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 92.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in c around inf 59.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i} \]

   if -4.5999999999999998e-125 < (*.f64 x y) < 2.9500000000000002e-235

   1. Initial program 97.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 97.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 97.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 97.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 97.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 97.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 97.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in c around 0 78.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around inf 78.5%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in a around 0 49.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]

   if 2.9500000000000002e-235 < (*.f64 x y) < 1.8499999999999999e89

   1. Initial program 96.7%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 96.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 98.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 98.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around inf 42.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b} \]
3. Recombined 4 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 56.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -1.72 \cdot 10^{-12}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq -4.6 \cdot 10^{-125}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 2.95 \cdot 10^{-235}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 1.85 \cdot 10^{+89}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 65.1% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -2.6 \cdot 10^{-14}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq -1.05 \cdot 10^{-209}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 1.18 \cdot 10^{+32}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + c \cdot i\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* x y) -2.6e-14)
   (+ (* x y) (* z t))
   (if (<= (* x y) -1.05e-209)
     (+ (* c i) (* z t))
     (if (<= (* x y) 1.18e+32) (+ (* a b) (* z t)) (+ (* x y) (* c i))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -2.6e-14) {
		tmp = (x * y) + (z * t);
	} else if ((x * y) <= -1.05e-209) {
		tmp = (c * i) + (z * t);
	} else if ((x * y) <= 1.18e+32) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	} else {
		tmp = (x * y) + (c * i);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x * y) <= (-2.6d-14)) then
        tmp = (x * y) + (z * t)
    else if ((x * y) <= (-1.05d-209)) then
        tmp = (c * i) + (z * t)
    else if ((x * y) <= 1.18d+32) then
        tmp = (a * b) + (z * t)
    else
        tmp = (x * y) + (c * i)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -2.6e-14) {
		tmp = (x * y) + (z * t);
	} else if ((x * y) <= -1.05e-209) {
		tmp = (c * i) + (z * t);
	} else if ((x * y) <= 1.18e+32) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	} else {
		tmp = (x * y) + (c * i);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if (x * y) <= -2.6e-14:
		tmp = (x * y) + (z * t)
	elif (x * y) <= -1.05e-209:
		tmp = (c * i) + (z * t)
	elif (x * y) <= 1.18e+32:
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t)
	else:
		tmp = (x * y) + (c * i)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(x * y) <= -2.6e-14)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t));
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= -1.05e-209)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(c * i) + Float64(z * t));
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= 1.18e+32)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(z * t));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(c * i));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x * y) <= -2.6e-14)
		tmp = (x * y) + (z * t);
	elseif ((x * y) <= -1.05e-209)
		tmp = (c * i) + (z * t);
	elseif ((x * y) <= 1.18e+32)
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	else
		tmp = (x * y) + (c * i);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -2.6e-14], N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -1.05e-209], N[(N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 1.18e+32], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 4 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -2.59999999999999997e-14

   1. Initial program 96.8%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 96.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 98.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 98.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 98.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 98.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 98.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in c around 0 94.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in a around 0 80.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z + x \cdot y} \]

   if -2.59999999999999997e-14 < (*.f64 x y) < -1.04999999999999998e-209

   1. Initial program 94.6%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 94.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 94.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 94.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 94.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 94.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 94.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around 0 80.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around inf 77.2%

      \[\leadsto c \cdot i + \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]

   if -1.04999999999999998e-209 < (*.f64 x y) < 1.1800000000000001e32

   1. Initial program 96.6%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 96.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 97.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 97.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 98.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 98.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 98.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in c around 0 81.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around inf 77.3%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]

   if 1.1800000000000001e32 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 91.3%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 91.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 91.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 91.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 92.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 94.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 94.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around 0 85.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around 0 80.2%

      \[\leadsto c \cdot i + \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
3. Recombined 4 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 78.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -2.6 \cdot 10^{-14}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq -1.05 \cdot 10^{-209}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 1.18 \cdot 10^{+32}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + c \cdot i\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 65.5% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -1.65 \cdot 10^{+37}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq -4 \cdot 10^{-209}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 5.6 \cdot 10^{+29}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + c \cdot i\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* x y) -1.65e+37)
   (+ (* x y) (* a b))
   (if (<= (* x y) -4e-209)
     (+ (* c i) (* z t))
     (if (<= (* x y) 5.6e+29) (+ (* a b) (* z t)) (+ (* x y) (* c i))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -1.65e+37) {
		tmp = (x * y) + (a * b);
	} else if ((x * y) <= -4e-209) {
		tmp = (c * i) + (z * t);
	} else if ((x * y) <= 5.6e+29) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	} else {
		tmp = (x * y) + (c * i);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x * y) <= (-1.65d+37)) then
        tmp = (x * y) + (a * b)
    else if ((x * y) <= (-4d-209)) then
        tmp = (c * i) + (z * t)
    else if ((x * y) <= 5.6d+29) then
        tmp = (a * b) + (z * t)
    else
        tmp = (x * y) + (c * i)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -1.65e+37) {
		tmp = (x * y) + (a * b);
	} else if ((x * y) <= -4e-209) {
		tmp = (c * i) + (z * t);
	} else if ((x * y) <= 5.6e+29) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	} else {
		tmp = (x * y) + (c * i);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if (x * y) <= -1.65e+37:
		tmp = (x * y) + (a * b)
	elif (x * y) <= -4e-209:
		tmp = (c * i) + (z * t)
	elif (x * y) <= 5.6e+29:
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t)
	else:
		tmp = (x * y) + (c * i)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(x * y) <= -1.65e+37)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(a * b));
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= -4e-209)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(c * i) + Float64(z * t));
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= 5.6e+29)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(z * t));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(c * i));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x * y) <= -1.65e+37)
		tmp = (x * y) + (a * b);
	elseif ((x * y) <= -4e-209)
		tmp = (c * i) + (z * t);
	elseif ((x * y) <= 5.6e+29)
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	else
		tmp = (x * y) + (c * i);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -1.65e+37], N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -4e-209], N[(N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 5.6e+29], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 4 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -1.65e37

   1. Initial program 96.3%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 96.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 98.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 98.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 98.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 98.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 98.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in c around 0 93.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around 0 81.8%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]

   if -1.65e37 < (*.f64 x y) < -4.0000000000000002e-209

   1. Initial program 95.6%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 95.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 95.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 95.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 95.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 95.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 95.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around 0 78.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around inf 72.7%

      \[\leadsto c \cdot i + \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]

   if -4.0000000000000002e-209 < (*.f64 x y) < 5.5999999999999999e29

   1. Initial program 96.6%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 96.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 97.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 97.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 98.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 98.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 98.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in c around 0 81.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around inf 77.3%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]

   if 5.5999999999999999e29 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 91.3%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 91.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 91.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 91.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 92.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 94.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 94.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around 0 85.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around 0 80.2%

      \[\leadsto c \cdot i + \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
3. Recombined 4 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 78.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -1.65 \cdot 10^{+37}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq -4 \cdot 10^{-209}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 5.6 \cdot 10^{+29}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + c \cdot i\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 63.4% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := x \cdot y + a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -1.95 \cdot 10^{-13}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq -1.35 \cdot 10^{-124}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 75000:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ (* x y) (* a b))))
   (if (<= (* x y) -1.95e-13)
     t_1
     (if (<= (* x y) -1.35e-124)
       (+ (* a b) (* c i))
       (if (<= (* x y) 75000.0) (+ (* a b) (* z t)) t_1)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = (x * y) + (a * b);
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -1.95e-13) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if ((x * y) <= -1.35e-124) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i);
	} else if ((x * y) <= 75000.0) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = (x * y) + (a * b)
    if ((x * y) <= (-1.95d-13)) then
        tmp = t_1
    else if ((x * y) <= (-1.35d-124)) then
        tmp = (a * b) + (c * i)
    else if ((x * y) <= 75000.0d0) then
        tmp = (a * b) + (z * t)
    else
        tmp = t_1
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = (x * y) + (a * b);
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -1.95e-13) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if ((x * y) <= -1.35e-124) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i);
	} else if ((x * y) <= 75000.0) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	t_1 = (x * y) + (a * b)
	tmp = 0
	if (x * y) <= -1.95e-13:
		tmp = t_1
	elif (x * y) <= -1.35e-124:
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i)
	elif (x * y) <= 75000.0:
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t)
	else:
		tmp = t_1
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(a * b))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(x * y) <= -1.95e-13)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= -1.35e-124)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(c * i));
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= 75000.0)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(z * t));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = (x * y) + (a * b);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x * y) <= -1.95e-13)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif ((x * y) <= -1.35e-124)
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i);
	elseif ((x * y) <= 75000.0)
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -1.95e-13], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -1.35e-124], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 75000.0], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -1.95000000000000002e-13 or 75000 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 92.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 92.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 94.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 94.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 95.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 96.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 96.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in c around 0 85.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around 0 73.9%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]

   if -1.95000000000000002e-13 < (*.f64 x y) < -1.35000000000000009e-124

   1. Initial program 92.6%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 92.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 92.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right) \]

   3. Simplified 92.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 78.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around 0 71.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + c \cdot i} \]

   if -1.35000000000000009e-124 < (*.f64 x y) < 75000

   1. Initial program 98.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 98.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 98.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 98.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 98.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 98.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 98.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in c around 0 79.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around inf 77.7%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 74.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -1.95 \cdot 10^{-13}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq -1.35 \cdot 10^{-124}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 75000:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + a \cdot b\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 87.6% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := x \cdot y + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{if}\;a \cdot b \leq -200000 \lor \neg \left(a \cdot b \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+36}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + t\_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ (* x y) (* z t))))
   (if (or (<= (* a b) -200000.0) (not (<= (* a b) 2e+36)))
     (+ (* a b) t_1)
     (+ (* c i) t_1))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = (x * y) + (z * t);
	double tmp;
	if (((a * b) <= -200000.0) || !((a * b) <= 2e+36)) {
		tmp = (a * b) + t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = (c * i) + t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = (x * y) + (z * t)
    if (((a * b) <= (-200000.0d0)) .or. (.not. ((a * b) <= 2d+36))) then
        tmp = (a * b) + t_1
    else
        tmp = (c * i) + t_1
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = (x * y) + (z * t);
	double tmp;
	if (((a * b) <= -200000.0) || !((a * b) <= 2e+36)) {
		tmp = (a * b) + t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = (c * i) + t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	t_1 = (x * y) + (z * t)
	tmp = 0
	if ((a * b) <= -200000.0) or not ((a * b) <= 2e+36):
		tmp = (a * b) + t_1
	else:
		tmp = (c * i) + t_1
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t))
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(a * b) <= -200000.0) || !(Float64(a * b) <= 2e+36))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + t_1);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(c * i) + t_1);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = (x * y) + (z * t);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((a * b) <= -200000.0) || ~(((a * b) <= 2e+36)))
		tmp = (a * b) + t_1;
	else
		tmp = (c * i) + t_1;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[Or[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], -200000.0], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], 2e+36]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + t$95$1), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision] + t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 a b) < -2e5 or 2.00000000000000008e36 < (*.f64 a b)

   1. Initial program 90.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 90.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 92.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 92.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 94.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 96.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 96.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in c around 0 84.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   if -2e5 < (*.f64 a b) < 2.00000000000000008e36

   1. Initial program 97.4%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 97.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 97.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 97.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 97.5%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 97.5%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 97.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around 0 93.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 89.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \cdot b \leq -200000 \lor \neg \left(a \cdot b \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+36}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 87.4% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := x \cdot y + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{if}\;a \cdot b \leq -200000:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \cdot b \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+29}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + t\_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ (* x y) (* z t))))
   (if (<= (* a b) -200000.0)
     (+ (* a b) t_1)
     (if (<= (* a b) 5e+29) (+ (* c i) t_1) (+ (* x y) (+ (* a b) (* c i)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = (x * y) + (z * t);
	double tmp;
	if ((a * b) <= -200000.0) {
		tmp = (a * b) + t_1;
	} else if ((a * b) <= 5e+29) {
		tmp = (c * i) + t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = (x * y) + ((a * b) + (c * i));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = (x * y) + (z * t)
    if ((a * b) <= (-200000.0d0)) then
        tmp = (a * b) + t_1
    else if ((a * b) <= 5d+29) then
        tmp = (c * i) + t_1
    else
        tmp = (x * y) + ((a * b) + (c * i))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = (x * y) + (z * t);
	double tmp;
	if ((a * b) <= -200000.0) {
		tmp = (a * b) + t_1;
	} else if ((a * b) <= 5e+29) {
		tmp = (c * i) + t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = (x * y) + ((a * b) + (c * i));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	t_1 = (x * y) + (z * t)
	tmp = 0
	if (a * b) <= -200000.0:
		tmp = (a * b) + t_1
	elif (a * b) <= 5e+29:
		tmp = (c * i) + t_1
	else:
		tmp = (x * y) + ((a * b) + (c * i))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(a * b) <= -200000.0)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + t_1);
	elseif (Float64(a * b) <= 5e+29)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(c * i) + t_1);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(c * i)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = (x * y) + (z * t);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((a * b) <= -200000.0)
		tmp = (a * b) + t_1;
	elseif ((a * b) <= 5e+29)
		tmp = (c * i) + t_1;
	else
		tmp = (x * y) + ((a * b) + (c * i));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], -200000.0], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + t$95$1), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], 5e+29], N[(N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision] + t$95$1), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 a b) < -2e5

   1. Initial program 96.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 96.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 98.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 98.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in c around 0 88.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   if -2e5 < (*.f64 a b) < 5.0000000000000001e29

   1. Initial program 97.4%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 97.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 97.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 97.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 97.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 97.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 97.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around 0 92.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   if 5.0000000000000001e29 < (*.f64 a b)

   1. Initial program 86.3%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 86.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 86.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right) \]

   3. Simplified 86.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 84.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right) \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 90.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \cdot b \leq -200000:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \cdot b \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+29}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 12: 42.8% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \cdot b \leq -2.3 \cdot 10^{+62}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \cdot b \leq 2.5 \cdot 10^{-204}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \cdot b \leq 2.3 \cdot 10^{+44}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* a b) -2.3e+62)
   (* a b)
   (if (<= (* a b) 2.5e-204)
     (* z t)
     (if (<= (* a b) 2.3e+44) (* c i) (* a b)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((a * b) <= -2.3e+62) {
		tmp = a * b;
	} else if ((a * b) <= 2.5e-204) {
		tmp = z * t;
	} else if ((a * b) <= 2.3e+44) {
		tmp = c * i;
	} else {
		tmp = a * b;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((a * b) <= (-2.3d+62)) then
        tmp = a * b
    else if ((a * b) <= 2.5d-204) then
        tmp = z * t
    else if ((a * b) <= 2.3d+44) then
        tmp = c * i
    else
        tmp = a * b
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((a * b) <= -2.3e+62) {
		tmp = a * b;
	} else if ((a * b) <= 2.5e-204) {
		tmp = z * t;
	} else if ((a * b) <= 2.3e+44) {
		tmp = c * i;
	} else {
		tmp = a * b;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if (a * b) <= -2.3e+62:
		tmp = a * b
	elif (a * b) <= 2.5e-204:
		tmp = z * t
	elif (a * b) <= 2.3e+44:
		tmp = c * i
	else:
		tmp = a * b
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(a * b) <= -2.3e+62)
		tmp = Float64(a * b);
	elseif (Float64(a * b) <= 2.5e-204)
		tmp = Float64(z * t);
	elseif (Float64(a * b) <= 2.3e+44)
		tmp = Float64(c * i);
	else
		tmp = Float64(a * b);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((a * b) <= -2.3e+62)
		tmp = a * b;
	elseif ((a * b) <= 2.5e-204)
		tmp = z * t;
	elseif ((a * b) <= 2.3e+44)
		tmp = c * i;
	else
		tmp = a * b;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], -2.3e+62], N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], 2.5e-204], N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], 2.3e+44], N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 a b) < -2.29999999999999984e62 or 2.30000000000000004e44 < (*.f64 a b)

   1. Initial program 89.5%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 89.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 91.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 91.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 94.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 95.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 95.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around inf 60.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b} \]

   if -2.29999999999999984e62 < (*.f64 a b) < 2.5000000000000001e-204

   1. Initial program 97.4%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 97.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 97.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 97.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 97.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 97.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 97.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in c around 0 82.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around inf 40.3%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in a around 0 36.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]

   if 2.5000000000000001e-204 < (*.f64 a b) < 2.30000000000000004e44

   1. Initial program 98.1%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 98.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 98.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 98.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 98.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 98.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 98.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in c around inf 39.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 44.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \cdot b \leq -2.3 \cdot 10^{+62}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \cdot b \leq 2.5 \cdot 10^{-204}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \cdot b \leq 2.3 \cdot 10^{+44}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 13: 60.4% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -4.8 \cdot 10^{+37} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq 8.8 \cdot 10^{+89}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + c \cdot i\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* x y) -4.8e+37) (not (<= (* x y) 8.8e+89)))
   (* x y)
   (+ (* a b) (* c i))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x * y) <= -4.8e+37) || !((x * y) <= 8.8e+89)) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((x * y) <= (-4.8d+37)) .or. (.not. ((x * y) <= 8.8d+89))) then
        tmp = x * y
    else
        tmp = (a * b) + (c * i)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x * y) <= -4.8e+37) || !((x * y) <= 8.8e+89)) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if ((x * y) <= -4.8e+37) or not ((x * y) <= 8.8e+89):
		tmp = x * y
	else:
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(x * y) <= -4.8e+37) || !(Float64(x * y) <= 8.8e+89))
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(c * i));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((x * y) <= -4.8e+37) || ~(((x * y) <= 8.8e+89)))
		tmp = x * y;
	else
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -4.8e+37], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 8.8e+89]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -4.8e37 or 8.8000000000000001e89 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 92.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 92.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 93.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 93.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 94.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 95.5%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 95.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in c around 0 87.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around 0 78.9%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in a around 0 69.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]

   if -4.8e37 < (*.f64 x y) < 8.8000000000000001e89

   1. Initial program 96.5%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 96.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 96.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right) \]

   3. Simplified 96.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 64.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around 0 58.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + c \cdot i} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 63.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -4.8 \cdot 10^{+37} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq 8.8 \cdot 10^{+89}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + c \cdot i\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 14: 77.2% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \leq -2.7 \cdot 10^{+140}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \leq 4.6 \cdot 10^{+40}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= c -2.7e+140)
   (+ (* x y) (* c i))
   (if (<= c 4.6e+40) (+ (* a b) (+ (* x y) (* z t))) (+ (* c i) (* z t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (c <= -2.7e+140) {
		tmp = (x * y) + (c * i);
	} else if (c <= 4.6e+40) {
		tmp = (a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t));
	} else {
		tmp = (c * i) + (z * t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (c <= (-2.7d+140)) then
        tmp = (x * y) + (c * i)
    else if (c <= 4.6d+40) then
        tmp = (a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t))
    else
        tmp = (c * i) + (z * t)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (c <= -2.7e+140) {
		tmp = (x * y) + (c * i);
	} else if (c <= 4.6e+40) {
		tmp = (a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t));
	} else {
		tmp = (c * i) + (z * t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if c <= -2.7e+140:
		tmp = (x * y) + (c * i)
	elif c <= 4.6e+40:
		tmp = (a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t))
	else:
		tmp = (c * i) + (z * t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (c <= -2.7e+140)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(c * i));
	elseif (c <= 4.6e+40)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(c * i) + Float64(z * t));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (c <= -2.7e+140)
		tmp = (x * y) + (c * i);
	elseif (c <= 4.6e+40)
		tmp = (a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t));
	else
		tmp = (c * i) + (z * t);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[c, -2.7e+140], N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[c, 4.6e+40], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if c < -2.70000000000000018e140

   1. Initial program 89.5%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 89.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 89.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 89.5%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 89.5%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 89.5%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 89.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around 0 86.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around 0 83.6%

      \[\leadsto c \cdot i + \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]

   if -2.70000000000000018e140 < c < 4.59999999999999987e40

   1. Initial program 97.7%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 97.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 98.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 98.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in c around 0 90.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   if 4.59999999999999987e40 < c

   1. Initial program 88.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 88.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 91.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 91.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 91.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 93.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 93.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around 0 73.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around inf 56.6%

      \[\leadsto c \cdot i + \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 83.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \leq -2.7 \cdot 10^{+140}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \leq 4.6 \cdot 10^{+40}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 15: 42.5% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \cdot b \leq -0.008 \lor \neg \left(a \cdot b \leq 4.4 \cdot 10^{+41}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* a b) -0.008) (not (<= (* a b) 4.4e+41))) (* a b) (* c i)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((a * b) <= -0.008) || !((a * b) <= 4.4e+41)) {
		tmp = a * b;
	} else {
		tmp = c * i;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((a * b) <= (-0.008d0)) .or. (.not. ((a * b) <= 4.4d+41))) then
        tmp = a * b
    else
        tmp = c * i
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((a * b) <= -0.008) || !((a * b) <= 4.4e+41)) {
		tmp = a * b;
	} else {
		tmp = c * i;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if ((a * b) <= -0.008) or not ((a * b) <= 4.4e+41):
		tmp = a * b
	else:
		tmp = c * i
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(a * b) <= -0.008) || !(Float64(a * b) <= 4.4e+41))
		tmp = Float64(a * b);
	else
		tmp = Float64(c * i);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((a * b) <= -0.008) || ~(((a * b) <= 4.4e+41)))
		tmp = a * b;
	else
		tmp = c * i;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], -0.008], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], 4.4e+41]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 a b) < -0.0080000000000000002 or 4.3999999999999998e41 < (*.f64 a b)

   1. Initial program 91.1%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 91.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 93.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 93.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 95.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 96.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 96.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around inf 54.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b} \]

   if -0.0080000000000000002 < (*.f64 a b) < 4.3999999999999998e41

   1. Initial program 97.4%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 97.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 97.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 97.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 97.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 97.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 97.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in c around inf 25.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 37.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \cdot b \leq -0.008 \lor \neg \left(a \cdot b \leq 4.4 \cdot 10^{+41}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 16: 26.0% accurate, 5.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ a \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i) :precision binary64 (* a b))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return a * b;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = a * b
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return a * b;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return a * b

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(a * b)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = a * b;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 94.9%

   \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 94.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

   2. fma-define 95.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. +-commutative 95.7%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

   4. fma-define 96.5%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

   5. fma-define 96.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

3. Simplified 96.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in a around inf 25.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024135 
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
  :name "Linear.V4:$cdot from linear-1.19.1.3, C"
  :precision binary64
  (+ (+ (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* a b)) (* c i)))