Difference of squares

Percentage Accurate: 93.4% → 98.5%
Time: 4.3s
Alternatives: 4
Speedup: 0.5×

Specification

?
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ a \cdot a - b \cdot b \end{array} \]
(FPCore (a b) :precision binary64 (- (* a a) (* b b)))
double code(double a, double b) {
	return (a * a) - (b * b);
}
real(8) function code(a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = (a * a) - (b * b)
end function
public static double code(double a, double b) {
	return (a * a) - (b * b);
}
def code(a, b):
	return (a * a) - (b * b)
function code(a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(a * a) - Float64(b * b))
end
function tmp = code(a, b)
	tmp = (a * a) - (b * b);
end
code[a_, b_] := N[(N[(a * a), $MachinePrecision] - N[(b * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
a \cdot a - b \cdot b
\end{array}

Sampling outcomes in binary64 precision:

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 4 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 93.4% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ a \cdot a - b \cdot b \end{array} \]
(FPCore (a b) :precision binary64 (- (* a a) (* b b)))
double code(double a, double b) {
	return (a * a) - (b * b);
}
real(8) function code(a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = (a * a) - (b * b)
end function
public static double code(double a, double b) {
	return (a * a) - (b * b);
}
def code(a, b):
	return (a * a) - (b * b)
function code(a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(a * a) - Float64(b * b))
end
function tmp = code(a, b)
	tmp = (a * a) - (b * b);
end
code[a_, b_] := N[(N[(a * a), $MachinePrecision] - N[(b * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
a \cdot a - b \cdot b
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 98.5% accurate, 0.1× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} a_m = \left|a\right| \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a\_m \leq 10^{+221}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a\_m, a\_m, -b \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a\_m \cdot a\_m\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
a_m = (fabs.f64 a)
(FPCore (a_m b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= a_m 1e+221) (fma a_m a_m (- (* b b))) (* a_m a_m)))
a_m = fabs(a);
double code(double a_m, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (a_m <= 1e+221) {
		tmp = fma(a_m, a_m, -(b * b));
	} else {
		tmp = a_m * a_m;
	}
	return tmp;
}
a_m = abs(a)
function code(a_m, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (a_m <= 1e+221)
		tmp = fma(a_m, a_m, Float64(-Float64(b * b)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(a_m * a_m);
	end
	return tmp
end
a_m = N[Abs[a], $MachinePrecision]
code[a$95$m_, b_] := If[LessEqual[a$95$m, 1e+221], N[(a$95$m * a$95$m + (-N[(b * b), $MachinePrecision])), $MachinePrecision], N[(a$95$m * a$95$m), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}
a_m = \left|a\right|

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;a\_m \leq 10^{+221}:\\
\;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a\_m, a\_m, -b \cdot b\right)\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;a\_m \cdot a\_m\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if a < 1e221

    1. Initial program 93.8%

      \[a \cdot a - b \cdot b \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. sqr-neg93.8%

        \[\leadsto a \cdot a - \color{blue}{\left(-b\right) \cdot \left(-b\right)} \]
      2. cancel-sign-sub93.8%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot a + b \cdot \left(-b\right)} \]
      3. fma-define97.5%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, a, b \cdot \left(-b\right)\right)} \]
    3. Simplified97.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, a, b \cdot \left(-b\right)\right)} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing

    if 1e221 < a

    1. Initial program 92.9%

      \[a \cdot a - b \cdot b \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Step-by-step derivation
      1. difference-of-squares100.0%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \left(a - b\right)} \]
      2. sub-neg100.0%

        \[\leadsto \left(a + b\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(a + \left(-b\right)\right)} \]
      3. add-sqr-sqrt50.0%

        \[\leadsto \left(a + b\right) \cdot \left(a + \color{blue}{\sqrt{-b} \cdot \sqrt{-b}}\right) \]
      4. sqrt-unprod100.0%

        \[\leadsto \left(a + b\right) \cdot \left(a + \color{blue}{\sqrt{\left(-b\right) \cdot \left(-b\right)}}\right) \]
      5. sqr-neg100.0%

        \[\leadsto \left(a + b\right) \cdot \left(a + \sqrt{\color{blue}{b \cdot b}}\right) \]
      6. sqrt-prod50.0%

        \[\leadsto \left(a + b\right) \cdot \left(a + \color{blue}{\sqrt{b} \cdot \sqrt{b}}\right) \]
      7. add-sqr-sqrt100.0%

        \[\leadsto \left(a + b\right) \cdot \left(a + \color{blue}{b}\right) \]
    4. Applied egg-rr100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \left(a + b\right)} \]
    5. Taylor expanded in a around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(a + b\right) \cdot \color{blue}{a} \]
    6. Taylor expanded in a around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a} \cdot a \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification97.7%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq 10^{+221}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, a, -b \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot a\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 96.5% accurate, 0.5× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} a_m = \left|a\right| \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \cdot b \leq 10^{+303}:\\ \;\;\;\;a\_m \cdot a\_m - b \cdot b\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-b \cdot b\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
a_m = (fabs.f64 a)
(FPCore (a_m b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* b b) 1e+303) (- (* a_m a_m) (* b b)) (- (* b b))))
a_m = fabs(a);
double code(double a_m, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((b * b) <= 1e+303) {
		tmp = (a_m * a_m) - (b * b);
	} else {
		tmp = -(b * b);
	}
	return tmp;
}
a_m = abs(a)
real(8) function code(a_m, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a_m
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((b * b) <= 1d+303) then
        tmp = (a_m * a_m) - (b * b)
    else
        tmp = -(b * b)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
a_m = Math.abs(a);
public static double code(double a_m, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((b * b) <= 1e+303) {
		tmp = (a_m * a_m) - (b * b);
	} else {
		tmp = -(b * b);
	}
	return tmp;
}
a_m = math.fabs(a)
def code(a_m, b):
	tmp = 0
	if (b * b) <= 1e+303:
		tmp = (a_m * a_m) - (b * b)
	else:
		tmp = -(b * b)
	return tmp
a_m = abs(a)
function code(a_m, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(b * b) <= 1e+303)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a_m * a_m) - Float64(b * b));
	else
		tmp = Float64(-Float64(b * b));
	end
	return tmp
end
a_m = abs(a);
function tmp_2 = code(a_m, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((b * b) <= 1e+303)
		tmp = (a_m * a_m) - (b * b);
	else
		tmp = -(b * b);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
a_m = N[Abs[a], $MachinePrecision]
code[a$95$m_, b_] := If[LessEqual[N[(b * b), $MachinePrecision], 1e+303], N[(N[(a$95$m * a$95$m), $MachinePrecision] - N[(b * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], (-N[(b * b), $MachinePrecision])]
\begin{array}{l}
a_m = \left|a\right|

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;b \cdot b \leq 10^{+303}:\\
\;\;\;\;a\_m \cdot a\_m - b \cdot b\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;-b \cdot b\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if (*.f64 b b) < 1e303

    1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[a \cdot a - b \cdot b \]
    2. Add Preprocessing

    if 1e303 < (*.f64 b b)

    1. Initial program 76.1%

      \[a \cdot a - b \cdot b \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in a around 0 89.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot {b}^{2}} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. neg-mul-189.6%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-{b}^{2}} \]
    5. Simplified89.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-{b}^{2}} \]
    6. Step-by-step derivation
      1. unpow289.6%

        \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{b \cdot b} \]
      2. distribute-lft-neg-in89.6%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-b\right) \cdot b} \]
    7. Applied egg-rr89.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-b\right) \cdot b} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification97.3%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \cdot b \leq 10^{+303}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot a - b \cdot b\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-b \cdot b\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 77.7% accurate, 0.6× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} a_m = \left|a\right| \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \cdot b \leq 10^{-18}:\\ \;\;\;\;a\_m \cdot a\_m\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-b \cdot b\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
a_m = (fabs.f64 a)
(FPCore (a_m b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* b b) 1e-18) (* a_m a_m) (- (* b b))))
a_m = fabs(a);
double code(double a_m, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((b * b) <= 1e-18) {
		tmp = a_m * a_m;
	} else {
		tmp = -(b * b);
	}
	return tmp;
}
a_m = abs(a)
real(8) function code(a_m, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a_m
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((b * b) <= 1d-18) then
        tmp = a_m * a_m
    else
        tmp = -(b * b)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
a_m = Math.abs(a);
public static double code(double a_m, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((b * b) <= 1e-18) {
		tmp = a_m * a_m;
	} else {
		tmp = -(b * b);
	}
	return tmp;
}
a_m = math.fabs(a)
def code(a_m, b):
	tmp = 0
	if (b * b) <= 1e-18:
		tmp = a_m * a_m
	else:
		tmp = -(b * b)
	return tmp
a_m = abs(a)
function code(a_m, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(b * b) <= 1e-18)
		tmp = Float64(a_m * a_m);
	else
		tmp = Float64(-Float64(b * b));
	end
	return tmp
end
a_m = abs(a);
function tmp_2 = code(a_m, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((b * b) <= 1e-18)
		tmp = a_m * a_m;
	else
		tmp = -(b * b);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
a_m = N[Abs[a], $MachinePrecision]
code[a$95$m_, b_] := If[LessEqual[N[(b * b), $MachinePrecision], 1e-18], N[(a$95$m * a$95$m), $MachinePrecision], (-N[(b * b), $MachinePrecision])]
\begin{array}{l}
a_m = \left|a\right|

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;b \cdot b \leq 10^{-18}:\\
\;\;\;\;a\_m \cdot a\_m\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;-b \cdot b\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if (*.f64 b b) < 1.0000000000000001e-18

    1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[a \cdot a - b \cdot b \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Step-by-step derivation
      1. difference-of-squares100.0%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \left(a - b\right)} \]
      2. sub-neg100.0%

        \[\leadsto \left(a + b\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(a + \left(-b\right)\right)} \]
      3. add-sqr-sqrt47.1%

        \[\leadsto \left(a + b\right) \cdot \left(a + \color{blue}{\sqrt{-b} \cdot \sqrt{-b}}\right) \]
      4. sqrt-unprod94.5%

        \[\leadsto \left(a + b\right) \cdot \left(a + \color{blue}{\sqrt{\left(-b\right) \cdot \left(-b\right)}}\right) \]
      5. sqr-neg94.5%

        \[\leadsto \left(a + b\right) \cdot \left(a + \sqrt{\color{blue}{b \cdot b}}\right) \]
      6. sqrt-prod47.3%

        \[\leadsto \left(a + b\right) \cdot \left(a + \color{blue}{\sqrt{b} \cdot \sqrt{b}}\right) \]
      7. add-sqr-sqrt85.8%

        \[\leadsto \left(a + b\right) \cdot \left(a + \color{blue}{b}\right) \]
    4. Applied egg-rr85.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \left(a + b\right)} \]
    5. Taylor expanded in a around inf 86.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(a + b\right) \cdot \color{blue}{a} \]
    6. Taylor expanded in a around inf 86.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a} \cdot a \]

    if 1.0000000000000001e-18 < (*.f64 b b)

    1. Initial program 87.9%

      \[a \cdot a - b \cdot b \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in a around 0 76.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot {b}^{2}} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. neg-mul-176.0%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-{b}^{2}} \]
    5. Simplified76.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-{b}^{2}} \]
    6. Step-by-step derivation
      1. unpow276.0%

        \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{b \cdot b} \]
      2. distribute-lft-neg-in76.0%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-b\right) \cdot b} \]
    7. Applied egg-rr76.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-b\right) \cdot b} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification80.8%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \cdot b \leq 10^{-18}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot a\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-b \cdot b\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 54.7% accurate, 2.3× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} a_m = \left|a\right| \\ a\_m \cdot a\_m \end{array} \]
a_m = (fabs.f64 a)
(FPCore (a_m b) :precision binary64 (* a_m a_m))
a_m = fabs(a);
double code(double a_m, double b) {
	return a_m * a_m;
}
a_m = abs(a)
real(8) function code(a_m, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a_m
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = a_m * a_m
end function
a_m = Math.abs(a);
public static double code(double a_m, double b) {
	return a_m * a_m;
}
a_m = math.fabs(a)
def code(a_m, b):
	return a_m * a_m
a_m = abs(a)
function code(a_m, b)
	return Float64(a_m * a_m)
end
a_m = abs(a);
function tmp = code(a_m, b)
	tmp = a_m * a_m;
end
a_m = N[Abs[a], $MachinePrecision]
code[a$95$m_, b_] := N[(a$95$m * a$95$m), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}
a_m = \left|a\right|

\\
a\_m \cdot a\_m
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 93.7%

    \[a \cdot a - b \cdot b \]
  2. Add Preprocessing
  3. Step-by-step derivation
    1. difference-of-squares100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \left(a - b\right)} \]
    2. sub-neg100.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(a + b\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(a + \left(-b\right)\right)} \]
    3. add-sqr-sqrt50.3%

      \[\leadsto \left(a + b\right) \cdot \left(a + \color{blue}{\sqrt{-b} \cdot \sqrt{-b}}\right) \]
    4. sqrt-unprod76.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(a + b\right) \cdot \left(a + \color{blue}{\sqrt{\left(-b\right) \cdot \left(-b\right)}}\right) \]
    5. sqr-neg76.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(a + b\right) \cdot \left(a + \sqrt{\color{blue}{b \cdot b}}\right) \]
    6. sqrt-prod27.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(a + b\right) \cdot \left(a + \color{blue}{\sqrt{b} \cdot \sqrt{b}}\right) \]
    7. add-sqr-sqrt53.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(a + b\right) \cdot \left(a + \color{blue}{b}\right) \]
  4. Applied egg-rr53.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \left(a + b\right)} \]
  5. Taylor expanded in a around inf 56.8%

    \[\leadsto \left(a + b\right) \cdot \color{blue}{a} \]
  6. Taylor expanded in a around inf 53.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a} \cdot a \]
  7. Add Preprocessing

Developer Target 1: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(a + b\right) \cdot \left(a - b\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (a b) :precision binary64 (* (+ a b) (- a b)))
double code(double a, double b) {
	return (a + b) * (a - b);
}
real(8) function code(a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = (a + b) * (a - b)
end function
public static double code(double a, double b) {
	return (a + b) * (a - b);
}
def code(a, b):
	return (a + b) * (a - b)
function code(a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(a + b) * Float64(a - b))
end
function tmp = code(a, b)
	tmp = (a + b) * (a - b);
end
code[a_, b_] := N[(N[(a + b), $MachinePrecision] * N[(a - b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\left(a + b\right) \cdot \left(a - b\right)
\end{array}

Reproduce

?
herbie shell --seed 2024133 
(FPCore (a b)
  :name "Difference of squares"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (! :herbie-platform default (* (+ a b) (- a b)))

  (- (* a a) (* b b)))