Logistic function from Lakshay Garg

Percentage Accurate: 54.7% → 99.5%

Time: 13.5s

Alternatives: 5

Speedup: 18.1×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (- (/ 2.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (* -2.0 x)))) 1.0))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return (2.0 / (1.0 + exp((-2.0 * x)))) - 1.0;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = (2.0d0 / (1.0d0 + exp(((-2.0d0) * x)))) - 1.0d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return (2.0 / (1.0 + Math.exp((-2.0 * x)))) - 1.0;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	return (2.0 / (1.0 + math.exp((-2.0 * x)))) - 1.0

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return Float64(Float64(2.0 / Float64(1.0 + exp(Float64(-2.0 * x)))) - 1.0)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = (2.0 / (1.0 + exp((-2.0 * x)))) - 1.0;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := N[(N[(2.0 / N[(1.0 + N[Exp[N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 54.7% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (- (/ 2.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (* -2.0 x)))) 1.0))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return (2.0 / (1.0 + exp((-2.0 * x)))) - 1.0;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = (2.0d0 / (1.0d0 + exp(((-2.0d0) * x)))) - 1.0d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return (2.0 / (1.0 + Math.exp((-2.0 * x)))) - 1.0;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	return (2.0 / (1.0 + math.exp((-2.0 * x)))) - 1.0

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return Float64(Float64(2.0 / Float64(1.0 + exp(Float64(-2.0 * x)))) - 1.0)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = (2.0 / (1.0 + exp((-2.0 * x)))) - 1.0;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := N[(N[(2.0 / N[(1.0 + N[Exp[N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.5% accurate, 0.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := e^{-2 \cdot x}\\ \mathbf{if}\;-2 \cdot x \leq -100000:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{2}{1 + t\_0} + -1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;-2 \cdot x \leq 10^{-6}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + -0.3333333333333333 \cdot {x}^{3}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{expm1}\left(\log 2 - \mathsf{log1p}\left(t\_0\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (exp (* -2.0 x))))
   (if (<= (* -2.0 x) -100000.0)
     (+ (/ 2.0 (+ 1.0 t_0)) -1.0)
     (if (<= (* -2.0 x) 1e-6)
       (+ x (* -0.3333333333333333 (pow x 3.0)))
       (expm1 (- (log 2.0) (log1p t_0)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	double t_0 = exp((-2.0 * x));
	double tmp;
	if ((-2.0 * x) <= -100000.0) {
		tmp = (2.0 / (1.0 + t_0)) + -1.0;
	} else if ((-2.0 * x) <= 1e-6) {
		tmp = x + (-0.3333333333333333 * pow(x, 3.0));
	} else {
		tmp = expm1((log(2.0) - log1p(t_0)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	double t_0 = Math.exp((-2.0 * x));
	double tmp;
	if ((-2.0 * x) <= -100000.0) {
		tmp = (2.0 / (1.0 + t_0)) + -1.0;
	} else if ((-2.0 * x) <= 1e-6) {
		tmp = x + (-0.3333333333333333 * Math.pow(x, 3.0));
	} else {
		tmp = Math.expm1((Math.log(2.0) - Math.log1p(t_0)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	t_0 = math.exp((-2.0 * x))
	tmp = 0
	if (-2.0 * x) <= -100000.0:
		tmp = (2.0 / (1.0 + t_0)) + -1.0
	elif (-2.0 * x) <= 1e-6:
		tmp = x + (-0.3333333333333333 * math.pow(x, 3.0))
	else:
		tmp = math.expm1((math.log(2.0) - math.log1p(t_0)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y)
	t_0 = exp(Float64(-2.0 * x))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(-2.0 * x) <= -100000.0)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(2.0 / Float64(1.0 + t_0)) + -1.0);
	elseif (Float64(-2.0 * x) <= 1e-6)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(-0.3333333333333333 * (x ^ 3.0)));
	else
		tmp = expm1(Float64(log(2.0) - log1p(t_0)));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[Exp[N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision], -100000.0], N[(N[(2.0 / N[(1.0 + t$95$0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision], 1e-6], N[(x + N[(-0.3333333333333333 * N[Power[x, 3.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(Exp[N[(N[Log[2.0], $MachinePrecision] - N[Log[1 + t$95$0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]] - 1), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 #s(literal -2 binary64) x) < -1e5

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   if -1e5 < (*.f64 #s(literal -2 binary64) x) < 9.99999999999999955e-7

   1. Initial program 8.1%

      \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + -0.3333333333333333 \cdot {x}^{2}\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-rgt-in 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 \cdot x + \left(-0.3333333333333333 \cdot {x}^{2}\right) \cdot x} \]

      2. *-lft-identity 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} + \left(-0.3333333333333333 \cdot {x}^{2}\right) \cdot x \]

      3. associate-*l* 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{-0.3333333333333333 \cdot \left({x}^{2} \cdot x\right)} \]

      4. unpow2 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + -0.3333333333333333 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot x\right)} \cdot x\right) \]

      5. unpow3 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + -0.3333333333333333 \cdot \color{blue}{{x}^{3}} \]

   5. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + -0.3333333333333333 \cdot {x}^{3}} \]

   if 9.99999999999999955e-7 < (*.f64 #s(literal -2 binary64) x)

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. add-exp-log 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\log \left(\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}}\right)}} - 1 \]

      2. expm1-define 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\log \left(\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}}\right)\right)} \]

      3. log-div 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\log 2 - \log \left(1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}\right)}\right) \]

      4. log1p-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\log 2 - \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{-2 \cdot x}\right)}\right) \]

      5. exp-prod 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\log 2 - \mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{{\left(e^{-2}\right)}^{x}}\right)\right) \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\log 2 - \mathsf{log1p}\left({\left(e^{-2}\right)}^{x}\right)\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\log 2 - \mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{e^{-2 \cdot x}}\right)\right) \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;-2 \cdot x \leq -100000:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} + -1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;-2 \cdot x \leq 10^{-6}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + -0.3333333333333333 \cdot {x}^{3}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{expm1}\left(\log 2 - \mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{-2 \cdot x}\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 99.5% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;-2 \cdot x \leq -100000:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} + -1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;-2 \cdot x \leq 10^{-6}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + -0.3333333333333333 \cdot {x}^{3}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{2}{1 + {\left(e^{x}\right)}^{-2}} + -1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* -2.0 x) -100000.0)
   (+ (/ 2.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (* -2.0 x)))) -1.0)
   (if (<= (* -2.0 x) 1e-6)
     (+ x (* -0.3333333333333333 (pow x 3.0)))
     (+ (/ 2.0 (+ 1.0 (pow (exp x) -2.0))) -1.0))))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if ((-2.0 * x) <= -100000.0) {
		tmp = (2.0 / (1.0 + exp((-2.0 * x)))) + -1.0;
	} else if ((-2.0 * x) <= 1e-6) {
		tmp = x + (-0.3333333333333333 * pow(x, 3.0));
	} else {
		tmp = (2.0 / (1.0 + pow(exp(x), -2.0))) + -1.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((-2.0d0) * x) <= (-100000.0d0)) then
        tmp = (2.0d0 / (1.0d0 + exp(((-2.0d0) * x)))) + (-1.0d0)
    else if (((-2.0d0) * x) <= 1d-6) then
        tmp = x + ((-0.3333333333333333d0) * (x ** 3.0d0))
    else
        tmp = (2.0d0 / (1.0d0 + (exp(x) ** (-2.0d0)))) + (-1.0d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if ((-2.0 * x) <= -100000.0) {
		tmp = (2.0 / (1.0 + Math.exp((-2.0 * x)))) + -1.0;
	} else if ((-2.0 * x) <= 1e-6) {
		tmp = x + (-0.3333333333333333 * Math.pow(x, 3.0));
	} else {
		tmp = (2.0 / (1.0 + Math.pow(Math.exp(x), -2.0))) + -1.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	tmp = 0
	if (-2.0 * x) <= -100000.0:
		tmp = (2.0 / (1.0 + math.exp((-2.0 * x)))) + -1.0
	elif (-2.0 * x) <= 1e-6:
		tmp = x + (-0.3333333333333333 * math.pow(x, 3.0))
	else:
		tmp = (2.0 / (1.0 + math.pow(math.exp(x), -2.0))) + -1.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(-2.0 * x) <= -100000.0)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(2.0 / Float64(1.0 + exp(Float64(-2.0 * x)))) + -1.0);
	elseif (Float64(-2.0 * x) <= 1e-6)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(-0.3333333333333333 * (x ^ 3.0)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(2.0 / Float64(1.0 + (exp(x) ^ -2.0))) + -1.0);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((-2.0 * x) <= -100000.0)
		tmp = (2.0 / (1.0 + exp((-2.0 * x)))) + -1.0;
	elseif ((-2.0 * x) <= 1e-6)
		tmp = x + (-0.3333333333333333 * (x ^ 3.0));
	else
		tmp = (2.0 / (1.0 + (exp(x) ^ -2.0))) + -1.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := If[LessEqual[N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision], -100000.0], N[(N[(2.0 / N[(1.0 + N[Exp[N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision], 1e-6], N[(x + N[(-0.3333333333333333 * N[Power[x, 3.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(2.0 / N[(1.0 + N[Power[N[Exp[x], $MachinePrecision], -2.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 #s(literal -2 binary64) x) < -1e5

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   if -1e5 < (*.f64 #s(literal -2 binary64) x) < 9.99999999999999955e-7

   1. Initial program 8.1%

      \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + -0.3333333333333333 \cdot {x}^{2}\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-rgt-in 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 \cdot x + \left(-0.3333333333333333 \cdot {x}^{2}\right) \cdot x} \]

      2. *-lft-identity 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} + \left(-0.3333333333333333 \cdot {x}^{2}\right) \cdot x \]

      3. associate-*l* 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{-0.3333333333333333 \cdot \left({x}^{2} \cdot x\right)} \]

      4. unpow2 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + -0.3333333333333333 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot x\right)} \cdot x\right) \]

      5. unpow3 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + -0.3333333333333333 \cdot \color{blue}{{x}^{3}} \]

   5. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + -0.3333333333333333 \cdot {x}^{3}} \]

   if 9.99999999999999955e-7 < (*.f64 #s(literal -2 binary64) x)

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{2}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{x \cdot -2}}} - 1 \]

      2. exp-prod 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{2}{1 + \color{blue}{{\left(e^{x}\right)}^{-2}}} - 1 \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2}{1 + \color{blue}{{\left(e^{x}\right)}^{-2}}} - 1 \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;-2 \cdot x \leq -100000:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} + -1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;-2 \cdot x \leq 10^{-6}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + -0.3333333333333333 \cdot {x}^{3}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{2}{1 + {\left(e^{x}\right)}^{-2}} + -1\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 99.5% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;-2 \cdot x \leq -100000 \lor \neg \left(-2 \cdot x \leq 10^{-6}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} + -1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + -0.3333333333333333 \cdot {x}^{3}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* -2.0 x) -100000.0) (not (<= (* -2.0 x) 1e-6)))
   (+ (/ 2.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (* -2.0 x)))) -1.0)
   (+ x (* -0.3333333333333333 (pow x 3.0)))))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (((-2.0 * x) <= -100000.0) || !((-2.0 * x) <= 1e-6)) {
		tmp = (2.0 / (1.0 + exp((-2.0 * x)))) + -1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (-0.3333333333333333 * pow(x, 3.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((((-2.0d0) * x) <= (-100000.0d0)) .or. (.not. (((-2.0d0) * x) <= 1d-6))) then
        tmp = (2.0d0 / (1.0d0 + exp(((-2.0d0) * x)))) + (-1.0d0)
    else
        tmp = x + ((-0.3333333333333333d0) * (x ** 3.0d0))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (((-2.0 * x) <= -100000.0) || !((-2.0 * x) <= 1e-6)) {
		tmp = (2.0 / (1.0 + Math.exp((-2.0 * x)))) + -1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (-0.3333333333333333 * Math.pow(x, 3.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	tmp = 0
	if ((-2.0 * x) <= -100000.0) or not ((-2.0 * x) <= 1e-6):
		tmp = (2.0 / (1.0 + math.exp((-2.0 * x)))) + -1.0
	else:
		tmp = x + (-0.3333333333333333 * math.pow(x, 3.0))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(-2.0 * x) <= -100000.0) || !(Float64(-2.0 * x) <= 1e-6))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(2.0 / Float64(1.0 + exp(Float64(-2.0 * x)))) + -1.0);
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(-0.3333333333333333 * (x ^ 3.0)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((-2.0 * x) <= -100000.0) || ~(((-2.0 * x) <= 1e-6)))
		tmp = (2.0 / (1.0 + exp((-2.0 * x)))) + -1.0;
	else
		tmp = x + (-0.3333333333333333 * (x ^ 3.0));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision], -100000.0], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision], 1e-6]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(2.0 / N[(1.0 + N[Exp[N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(-0.3333333333333333 * N[Power[x, 3.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 #s(literal -2 binary64) x) < -1e5 or 9.99999999999999955e-7 < (*.f64 #s(literal -2 binary64) x)

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   if -1e5 < (*.f64 #s(literal -2 binary64) x) < 9.99999999999999955e-7

   1. Initial program 8.1%

      \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + -0.3333333333333333 \cdot {x}^{2}\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-rgt-in 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 \cdot x + \left(-0.3333333333333333 \cdot {x}^{2}\right) \cdot x} \]

      2. *-lft-identity 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} + \left(-0.3333333333333333 \cdot {x}^{2}\right) \cdot x \]

      3. associate-*l* 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{-0.3333333333333333 \cdot \left({x}^{2} \cdot x\right)} \]

      4. unpow2 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + -0.3333333333333333 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot x\right)} \cdot x\right) \]

      5. unpow3 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + -0.3333333333333333 \cdot \color{blue}{{x}^{3}} \]

   5. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + -0.3333333333333333 \cdot {x}^{3}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;-2 \cdot x \leq -100000 \lor \neg \left(-2 \cdot x \leq 10^{-6}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} + -1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + -0.3333333333333333 \cdot {x}^{3}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 75.1% accurate, 18.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1:\\ \;\;\;\;-1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (if (<= x -1.0) -1.0 x))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1.0) {
		tmp = -1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-1.0d0)) then
        tmp = -1.0d0
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1.0) {
		tmp = -1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -1.0:
		tmp = -1.0
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -1.0)
		tmp = -1.0;
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -1.0)
		tmp = -1.0;
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := If[LessEqual[x, -1.0], -1.0, x]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -1

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 96.5%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2}{\color{blue}{2 + -2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 96.5%

         \[\leadsto \frac{2}{2 + \color{blue}{x \cdot -2}} - 1 \]

   5. Simplified 96.5%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2}{\color{blue}{2 + x \cdot -2}} - 1 \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1} \]

   if -1 < x

   1. Initial program 37.1%

      \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 70.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 27.1% accurate, 109.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -1 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 -1.0)

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return -1.0;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = -1.0d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return -1.0;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	return -1.0

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return -1.0
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = -1.0;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := -1.0

Derivation

1. Initial program 53.3%

   \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 29.1%

   \[\leadsto \frac{2}{\color{blue}{2 + -2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 29.1%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2}{2 + \color{blue}{x \cdot -2}} - 1 \]

5. Simplified 29.1%

   \[\leadsto \frac{2}{\color{blue}{2 + x \cdot -2}} - 1 \]

6. Taylor expanded in x around inf 28.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1} \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024132 
(FPCore (x y)
  :name "Logistic function from Lakshay Garg"
  :precision binary64
  (- (/ 2.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (* -2.0 x)))) 1.0))