Sample trimmed logistic on [-pi, pi]

Percentage Accurate: 98.9% → 98.9%
Time: 12.9s
Alternatives: 8
Speedup: 1.3×

Specification

?
\[\left(2.328306437 \cdot 10^{-10} \leq u \land u \leq 1\right) \land \left(0 \leq s \land s \leq 1.0651631\right)\]
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t\_0\right) + t\_0} - 1\right) \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (let* ((t_0 (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s))))))
   (*
    (- s)
    (log
     (-
      (/ 1.0 (+ (* u (- (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s)))) t_0)) t_0))
      1.0)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	float t_0 = 1.0f / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s)));
	return -s * logf(((1.0f / ((u * ((1.0f / (1.0f + expf((-((float) M_PI) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - 1.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	t_0 = Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s))))
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u * Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(-Float32(pi)) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - Float32(1.0))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	t_0 = single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s)));
	tmp = -s * log(((single(1.0) / ((u * ((single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((-single(pi) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - single(1.0)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t\_0\right) + t\_0} - 1\right)
\end{array}
\end{array}

Sampling outcomes in binary32 precision:

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 8 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 98.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t\_0\right) + t\_0} - 1\right) \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (let* ((t_0 (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s))))))
   (*
    (- s)
    (log
     (-
      (/ 1.0 (+ (* u (- (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s)))) t_0)) t_0))
      1.0)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	float t_0 = 1.0f / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s)));
	return -s * logf(((1.0f / ((u * ((1.0f / (1.0f + expf((-((float) M_PI) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - 1.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	t_0 = Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s))))
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u * Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(-Float32(pi)) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - Float32(1.0))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	t_0 = single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s)));
	tmp = -s * log(((single(1.0) / ((u * ((single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((-single(pi) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - single(1.0)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t\_0\right) + t\_0} - 1\right)
\end{array}
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 98.9% accurate, 0.8× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{log1p}\left(\mathsf{expm1}\left(-s\right)\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (*
  (log1p (expm1 (- s)))
  (log
   (+
    (/
     1.0
     (+ (/ u (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI (- s))))) (/ (- 1.0 u) (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s))))))
    -1.0))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return log1pf(expm1f(-s)) * logf(((1.0f / ((u / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / -s)))) + ((1.0f - u) / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s)))))) + -1.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(log1p(expm1(Float32(-s))) * log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / Float32(-s))))) + Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) - u) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s)))))) + Float32(-1.0))))
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\mathsf{log1p}\left(\mathsf{expm1}\left(-s\right)\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.9%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Step-by-step derivation
    1. add-sqr-sqrt97.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(-\color{blue}{\sqrt{s} \cdot \sqrt{s}}\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right) \]
    2. distribute-rgt-neg-in97.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{s} \cdot \left(-\sqrt{s}\right)\right)} \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right) \]
  5. Applied egg-rr97.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{s} \cdot \left(-\sqrt{s}\right)\right)} \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right) \]
  6. Step-by-step derivation
    1. distribute-rgt-neg-out97.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-\sqrt{s} \cdot \sqrt{s}\right)} \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right) \]
    2. add-sqr-sqrt98.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(-\color{blue}{s}\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right) \]
    3. log1p-expm1-u98.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\mathsf{expm1}\left(-s\right)\right)} \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right) \]
  7. Applied egg-rr98.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\mathsf{expm1}\left(-s\right)\right)} \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right) \]
  8. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 98.9% accurate, 1.3× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (*
  (- s)
  (log
   (+
    (/
     1.0
     (+ (/ u (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI (- s))))) (/ (- 1.0 u) (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s))))))
    -1.0))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return -s * logf(((1.0f / ((u / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / -s)))) + ((1.0f - u) / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s)))))) + -1.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / Float32(-s))))) + Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) - u) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s)))))) + Float32(-1.0))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = -s * log(((single(1.0) / ((u / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / -s)))) + ((single(1.0) - u) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s)))))) + single(-1.0)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.9%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 25.0% accurate, 1.9× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \pi \cdot \left(u \cdot 0.5 + -0.25\right)\\ s \cdot \left(\frac{s \cdot 0.25}{t\_0} - \left(\log \left(t\_0 \cdot -4\right) - \log s\right)\right) \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (let* ((t_0 (* PI (+ (* u 0.5) -0.25))))
   (* s (- (/ (* s 0.25) t_0) (- (log (* t_0 -4.0)) (log s))))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	float t_0 = ((float) M_PI) * ((u * 0.5f) + -0.25f);
	return s * (((s * 0.25f) / t_0) - (logf((t_0 * -4.0f)) - logf(s)));
}
function code(u, s)
	t_0 = Float32(Float32(pi) * Float32(Float32(u * Float32(0.5)) + Float32(-0.25)))
	return Float32(s * Float32(Float32(Float32(s * Float32(0.25)) / t_0) - Float32(log(Float32(t_0 * Float32(-4.0))) - log(s))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	t_0 = single(pi) * ((u * single(0.5)) + single(-0.25));
	tmp = s * (((s * single(0.25)) / t_0) - (log((t_0 * single(-4.0))) - log(s)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \pi \cdot \left(u \cdot 0.5 + -0.25\right)\\
s \cdot \left(\frac{s \cdot 0.25}{t\_0} - \left(\log \left(t\_0 \cdot -4\right) - \log s\right)\right)
\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.9%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Taylor expanded in s around inf 25.2%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + -4 \cdot \frac{0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)}{s}\right)} \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. +-commutative25.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(-4 \cdot \frac{0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)}{s} + 1\right)} \]
    2. fma-define25.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-4, \frac{0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)}{s}, 1\right)\right)} \]
    3. associate--r+25.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-4, \frac{\color{blue}{\left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) - 0.25 \cdot \pi}}{s}, 1\right)\right) \]
    4. cancel-sign-sub-inv25.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-4, \frac{\color{blue}{\left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi}}{s}, 1\right)\right) \]
    5. distribute-rgt-out--25.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-4, \frac{\color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \pi\right) \cdot \left(0.25 - -0.25\right)} + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi}{s}, 1\right)\right) \]
    6. *-commutative25.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-4, \frac{\color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot u\right)} \cdot \left(0.25 - -0.25\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi}{s}, 1\right)\right) \]
    7. metadata-eval25.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-4, \frac{\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot \color{blue}{0.5} + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi}{s}, 1\right)\right) \]
    8. metadata-eval25.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-4, \frac{\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{-0.25} \cdot \pi}{s}, 1\right)\right) \]
    9. *-commutative25.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-4, \frac{\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\pi \cdot -0.25}}{s}, 1\right)\right) \]
  6. Simplified25.2%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-4, \frac{\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot 0.5 + \pi \cdot -0.25}{s}, 1\right)\right)} \]
  7. Taylor expanded in s around 0 25.4%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(\log \left(-4 \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.5 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)\right) + -1 \cdot \log s\right) + 0.25 \cdot \frac{s}{-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.5 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)}\right)} \]
  8. Step-by-step derivation
    1. +-commutative25.4%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.25 \cdot \frac{s}{-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.5 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)} + -1 \cdot \left(\log \left(-4 \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.5 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)\right) + -1 \cdot \log s\right)\right)} \]
    2. mul-1-neg25.4%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(0.25 \cdot \frac{s}{-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.5 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)} + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(\log \left(-4 \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.5 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)\right) + -1 \cdot \log s\right)\right)}\right) \]
    3. unsub-neg25.4%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.25 \cdot \frac{s}{-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.5 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)} - \left(\log \left(-4 \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.5 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)\right) + -1 \cdot \log s\right)\right)} \]
  9. Simplified25.4%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(\frac{0.25 \cdot s}{\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot 0.5 + -0.25\right)} - \left(\log \left(\left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot 0.5 + -0.25\right)\right) \cdot -4\right) - \log s\right)\right)} \]
  10. Final simplification25.4%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\frac{s \cdot 0.25}{\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot 0.5 + -0.25\right)} - \left(\log \left(\left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot 0.5 + -0.25\right)\right) \cdot -4\right) - \log s\right)\right) \]
  11. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 25.0% accurate, 2.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \left(\log s - \log \left(\left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot 0.5 + -0.25\right)\right) \cdot -4\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (* s (- (log s) (log (* (* PI (+ (* u 0.5) -0.25)) -4.0)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return s * (logf(s) - logf(((((float) M_PI) * ((u * 0.5f) + -0.25f)) * -4.0f)));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(s * Float32(log(s) - log(Float32(Float32(Float32(pi) * Float32(Float32(u * Float32(0.5)) + Float32(-0.25))) * Float32(-4.0)))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = s * (log(s) - log(((single(pi) * ((u * single(0.5)) + single(-0.25))) * single(-4.0))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \left(\log s - \log \left(\left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot 0.5 + -0.25\right)\right) \cdot -4\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.9%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Taylor expanded in s around inf 25.2%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + -4 \cdot \frac{0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)}{s}\right)} \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. +-commutative25.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(-4 \cdot \frac{0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)}{s} + 1\right)} \]
    2. fma-define25.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-4, \frac{0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)}{s}, 1\right)\right)} \]
    3. associate--r+25.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-4, \frac{\color{blue}{\left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) - 0.25 \cdot \pi}}{s}, 1\right)\right) \]
    4. cancel-sign-sub-inv25.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-4, \frac{\color{blue}{\left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi}}{s}, 1\right)\right) \]
    5. distribute-rgt-out--25.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-4, \frac{\color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \pi\right) \cdot \left(0.25 - -0.25\right)} + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi}{s}, 1\right)\right) \]
    6. *-commutative25.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-4, \frac{\color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot u\right)} \cdot \left(0.25 - -0.25\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi}{s}, 1\right)\right) \]
    7. metadata-eval25.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-4, \frac{\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot \color{blue}{0.5} + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi}{s}, 1\right)\right) \]
    8. metadata-eval25.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-4, \frac{\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{-0.25} \cdot \pi}{s}, 1\right)\right) \]
    9. *-commutative25.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-4, \frac{\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\pi \cdot -0.25}}{s}, 1\right)\right) \]
  6. Simplified25.2%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-4, \frac{\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot 0.5 + \pi \cdot -0.25}{s}, 1\right)\right)} \]
  7. Taylor expanded in s around 0 25.4%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(s \cdot \left(\log \left(-4 \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.5 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)\right) + -1 \cdot \log s\right)\right)} \]
  8. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate-*r*25.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot s\right) \cdot \left(\log \left(-4 \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.5 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)\right) + -1 \cdot \log s\right)} \]
    2. neg-mul-125.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right)} \cdot \left(\log \left(-4 \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.5 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)\right) + -1 \cdot \log s\right) \]
    3. mul-1-neg25.4%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \left(\log \left(-4 \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.5 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-\log s\right)}\right) \]
    4. unsub-neg25.4%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\log \left(-4 \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.5 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)\right) - \log s\right)} \]
    5. *-commutative25.4%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \left(\log \color{blue}{\left(\left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.5 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \cdot -4\right)} - \log s\right) \]
    6. +-commutative25.4%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \left(\log \left(\color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + -0.25 \cdot \pi\right)} \cdot -4\right) - \log s\right) \]
    7. associate-*r*25.4%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \left(\log \left(\left(\color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot u\right) \cdot \pi} + -0.25 \cdot \pi\right) \cdot -4\right) - \log s\right) \]
    8. *-commutative25.4%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \left(\log \left(\left(\color{blue}{\left(u \cdot 0.5\right)} \cdot \pi + -0.25 \cdot \pi\right) \cdot -4\right) - \log s\right) \]
    9. distribute-rgt-out25.4%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \left(\log \left(\color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot 0.5 + -0.25\right)\right)} \cdot -4\right) - \log s\right) \]
  9. Simplified25.4%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \left(\log \left(\left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot 0.5 + -0.25\right)\right) \cdot -4\right) - \log s\right)} \]
  10. Final simplification25.4%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\log s - \log \left(\left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot 0.5 + -0.25\right)\right) \cdot -4\right)\right) \]
  11. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 25.1% accurate, 4.1× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (* (- s) (log1p (/ PI s))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return -s * log1pf((((float) M_PI) / s));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log1p(Float32(Float32(pi) / s)))
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.9%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Taylor expanded in s around inf 25.2%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + -4 \cdot \frac{0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)}{s}\right)} \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. +-commutative25.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(-4 \cdot \frac{0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)}{s} + 1\right)} \]
    2. fma-define25.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-4, \frac{0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)}{s}, 1\right)\right)} \]
    3. associate--r+25.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-4, \frac{\color{blue}{\left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) - 0.25 \cdot \pi}}{s}, 1\right)\right) \]
    4. cancel-sign-sub-inv25.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-4, \frac{\color{blue}{\left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi}}{s}, 1\right)\right) \]
    5. distribute-rgt-out--25.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-4, \frac{\color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \pi\right) \cdot \left(0.25 - -0.25\right)} + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi}{s}, 1\right)\right) \]
    6. *-commutative25.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-4, \frac{\color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot u\right)} \cdot \left(0.25 - -0.25\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi}{s}, 1\right)\right) \]
    7. metadata-eval25.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-4, \frac{\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot \color{blue}{0.5} + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi}{s}, 1\right)\right) \]
    8. metadata-eval25.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-4, \frac{\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{-0.25} \cdot \pi}{s}, 1\right)\right) \]
    9. *-commutative25.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-4, \frac{\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\pi \cdot -0.25}}{s}, 1\right)\right) \]
  6. Simplified25.2%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-4, \frac{\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot 0.5 + \pi \cdot -0.25}{s}, 1\right)\right)} \]
  7. Taylor expanded in u around 0 25.4%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(s \cdot \log \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right)\right)} \]
  8. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate-*r*25.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot s\right) \cdot \log \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right)} \]
    2. neg-mul-125.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right)} \cdot \log \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right) \]
    3. log1p-define25.4%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)} \]
  9. Simplified25.4%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)} \]
  10. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 11.5% accurate, 61.9× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \pi \cdot \left(-1 + u \cdot 2\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (* PI (+ -1.0 (* u 2.0))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return ((float) M_PI) * (-1.0f + (u * 2.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(pi) * Float32(Float32(-1.0) + Float32(u * Float32(2.0))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = single(pi) * (single(-1.0) + (u * single(2.0)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\pi \cdot \left(-1 + u \cdot 2\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.9%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Step-by-step derivation
    1. add-sqr-sqrt97.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(-\color{blue}{\sqrt{s} \cdot \sqrt{s}}\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right) \]
    2. distribute-rgt-neg-in97.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{s} \cdot \left(-\sqrt{s}\right)\right)} \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right) \]
  5. Applied egg-rr97.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{s} \cdot \left(-\sqrt{s}\right)\right)} \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right) \]
  6. Taylor expanded in s around inf 11.4%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)\right)} \]
  7. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate--r+11.4%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) - 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)} \]
    2. cancel-sign-sub-inv11.4%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right)} \]
    3. distribute-rgt-out--11.4%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \pi\right) \cdot \left(0.25 - -0.25\right)} + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right) \]
    4. *-commutative11.4%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot u\right)} \cdot \left(0.25 - -0.25\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right) \]
    5. metadata-eval11.4%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot \color{blue}{0.5} + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right) \]
    6. associate-*r*11.4%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot 0.5\right)} + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right) \]
    7. metadata-eval11.4%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot 0.5\right) + \color{blue}{-0.25} \cdot \pi\right) \]
    8. *-commutative11.4%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot 0.5\right) + \color{blue}{\pi \cdot -0.25}\right) \]
    9. fma-undefine11.4%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\pi, u \cdot 0.5, \pi \cdot -0.25\right)} \]
    10. fma-undefine11.4%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot 0.5\right) + \pi \cdot -0.25\right)} \]
    11. distribute-lft-in11.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot 0.5\right)\right) + 4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25\right)} \]
  8. Simplified11.4%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\pi \cdot \left(2 \cdot u + -1\right)} \]
  9. Final simplification11.4%

    \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \left(-1 + u \cdot 2\right) \]
  10. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 11.3% accurate, 216.5× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -\pi \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (- PI))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return -((float) M_PI);
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(-Float32(pi))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = -single(pi);
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
-\pi
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.9%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Taylor expanded in u around 0 11.3%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \pi} \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. neg-mul-111.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\pi} \]
  6. Simplified11.3%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\pi} \]
  7. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 10.4% accurate, 433.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 0 \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 0.0)
float code(float u, float s) {
	return 0.0f;
}
real(4) function code(u, s)
    real(4), intent (in) :: u
    real(4), intent (in) :: s
    code = 0.0e0
end function
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(0.0)
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = single(0.0);
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
0
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.9%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Taylor expanded in s around inf 10.0%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{1} \]
  5. Taylor expanded in s around 0 10.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0} \]
  6. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

?
herbie shell --seed 2024130 
(FPCore (u s)
  :name "Sample trimmed logistic on [-pi, pi]"
  :precision binary32
  :pre (and (and (<= 2.328306437e-10 u) (<= u 1.0)) (and (<= 0.0 s) (<= s 1.0651631)))
  (* (- s) (log (- (/ 1.0 (+ (* u (- (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s)))) (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s)))))) (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s)))))) 1.0))))