Logistic regression 2

Percentage Accurate: 99.3% → 99.4%

Time: 11.3s

Alternatives: 9

Speedup: 1.8×

• could not determine a ground truth

  1. x = 7.220275755349338e+20
  2. y = -1.8776331368323896e-142

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \log \left(1 + e^{x}\right) - x \cdot y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (- (log (+ 1.0 (exp x))) (* x y)))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return log((1.0 + exp(x))) - (x * y);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = log((1.0d0 + exp(x))) - (x * y)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return Math.log((1.0 + Math.exp(x))) - (x * y);
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	return math.log((1.0 + math.exp(x))) - (x * y)

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return Float64(log(Float64(1.0 + exp(x))) - Float64(x * y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = log((1.0 + exp(x))) - (x * y);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := N[(N[Log[N[(1.0 + N[Exp[x], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.3% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \log \left(1 + e^{x}\right) - x \cdot y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (- (log (+ 1.0 (exp x))) (* x y)))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return log((1.0 + exp(x))) - (x * y);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = log((1.0d0 + exp(x))) - (x * y)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return Math.log((1.0 + Math.exp(x))) - (x * y);
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	return math.log((1.0 + math.exp(x))) - (x * y)

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return Float64(log(Float64(1.0 + exp(x))) - Float64(x * y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = log((1.0 + exp(x))) - (x * y);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := N[(N[Log[N[(1.0 + N[Exp[x], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.4% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -95:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(-y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\log 2 + x \cdot \left(\left(0.5 + x \cdot 0.125\right) - y\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -95.0) (* x (- y)) (+ (log 2.0) (* x (- (+ 0.5 (* x 0.125)) y)))))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -95.0) {
		tmp = x * -y;
	} else {
		tmp = log(2.0) + (x * ((0.5 + (x * 0.125)) - y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-95.0d0)) then
        tmp = x * -y
    else
        tmp = log(2.0d0) + (x * ((0.5d0 + (x * 0.125d0)) - y))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -95.0) {
		tmp = x * -y;
	} else {
		tmp = Math.log(2.0) + (x * ((0.5 + (x * 0.125)) - y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -95.0:
		tmp = x * -y
	else:
		tmp = math.log(2.0) + (x * ((0.5 + (x * 0.125)) - y))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -95.0)
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(-y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(log(2.0) + Float64(x * Float64(Float64(0.5 + Float64(x * 0.125)) - y)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -95.0)
		tmp = x * -y;
	else
		tmp = log(2.0) + (x * ((0.5 + (x * 0.125)) - y));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := If[LessEqual[x, -95.0], N[(x * (-y)), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[Log[2.0], $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * N[(N[(0.5 + N[(x * 0.125), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -95

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\log \left(1 + e^{x}\right) - x \cdot y \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. log1p-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{x}\right)} - x \cdot y \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{x}\right) - x \cdot y} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-x \cdot y} \]

      2. distribute-lft-neg-in 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-x\right) \cdot y} \]

      3. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-x\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-x\right)} \]

   if -95 < x

   1. Initial program 99.4%

      \[\log \left(1 + e^{x}\right) - x \cdot y \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. log1p-define 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{x}\right)} - x \cdot y \]

   3. Simplified 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{x}\right) - x \cdot y} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log 2 + x \cdot \left(\left(0.5 + 0.125 \cdot x\right) - y\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -95:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(-y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\log 2 + x \cdot \left(\left(0.5 + x \cdot 0.125\right) - y\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 99.4% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(x, -y, \mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{x}\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (fma x (- y) (log1p (exp x))))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return fma(x, -y, log1p(exp(x)));
}

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return fma(x, Float64(-y), log1p(exp(x)))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := N[(x * (-y) + N[Log[1 + N[Exp[x], $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.6%

   \[\log \left(1 + e^{x}\right) - x \cdot y \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. cancel-sign-sub-inv 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left(1 + e^{x}\right) + \left(-x\right) \cdot y} \]

   2. +-commutative 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-x\right) \cdot y + \log \left(1 + e^{x}\right)} \]

   3. distribute-lft-neg-out 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-x \cdot y\right)} + \log \left(1 + e^{x}\right) \]

   4. distribute-rgt-neg-out 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(-y\right)} + \log \left(1 + e^{x}\right) \]

   5. fma-define 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, -y, \log \left(1 + e^{x}\right)\right)} \]

   6. log1p-define 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, -y, \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{x}\right)}\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, -y, \mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{x}\right)\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 99.3% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{x}\right) - x \cdot y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (- (log1p (exp x)) (* x y)))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return log1p(exp(x)) - (x * y);
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return Math.log1p(Math.exp(x)) - (x * y);
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	return math.log1p(math.exp(x)) - (x * y)

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return Float64(log1p(exp(x)) - Float64(x * y))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := N[(N[Log[1 + N[Exp[x], $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.6%

   \[\log \left(1 + e^{x}\right) - x \cdot y \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. log1p-define 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{x}\right)} - x \cdot y \]

3. Simplified 99.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{x}\right) - x \cdot y} \]
4. Add Preprocessing
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 80.9% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -7.2 \cdot 10^{-93} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 5.6 \cdot 10^{-43}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(-y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\log \left(x + 2\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -7.2e-93) (not (<= x 5.6e-43))) (* x (- y)) (log (+ x 2.0))))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -7.2e-93) || !(x <= 5.6e-43)) {
		tmp = x * -y;
	} else {
		tmp = log((x + 2.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-7.2d-93)) .or. (.not. (x <= 5.6d-43))) then
        tmp = x * -y
    else
        tmp = log((x + 2.0d0))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -7.2e-93) || !(x <= 5.6e-43)) {
		tmp = x * -y;
	} else {
		tmp = Math.log((x + 2.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -7.2e-93) or not (x <= 5.6e-43):
		tmp = x * -y
	else:
		tmp = math.log((x + 2.0))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -7.2e-93) || !(x <= 5.6e-43))
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(-y));
	else
		tmp = log(Float64(x + 2.0));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -7.2e-93) || ~((x <= 5.6e-43)))
		tmp = x * -y;
	else
		tmp = log((x + 2.0));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -7.2e-93], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 5.6e-43]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * (-y)), $MachinePrecision], N[Log[N[(x + 2.0), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -7.2000000000000003e-93 or 5.5999999999999996e-43 < x

   1. Initial program 99.2%

      \[\log \left(1 + e^{x}\right) - x \cdot y \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. log1p-define 99.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{x}\right)} - x \cdot y \]

   3. Simplified 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{x}\right) - x \cdot y} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 90.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 90.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-x \cdot y} \]

      2. distribute-lft-neg-in 90.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-x\right) \cdot y} \]

      3. *-commutative 90.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-x\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 90.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-x\right)} \]

   if -7.2000000000000003e-93 < x < 5.5999999999999996e-43

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\log \left(1 + e^{x}\right) - x \cdot y \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. log1p-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{x}\right)} - x \cdot y \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{x}\right) - x \cdot y} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\frac{\log \left(1 + e^{x}\right)}{x} - y\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. log1p-define 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(\frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{x}\right)}}{x} - y\right) \]

   7. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{x}\right)}{x} - y\right)} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in y around 0 81.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left(1 + e^{x}\right)} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in x around 0 81.1%

      \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left(2 + x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 86.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -7.2 \cdot 10^{-93} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 5.6 \cdot 10^{-43}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(-y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\log \left(x + 2\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 99.2% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -24:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(-y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\log 2 + x \cdot \left(0.5 - y\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -24.0) (* x (- y)) (+ (log 2.0) (* x (- 0.5 y)))))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -24.0) {
		tmp = x * -y;
	} else {
		tmp = log(2.0) + (x * (0.5 - y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-24.0d0)) then
        tmp = x * -y
    else
        tmp = log(2.0d0) + (x * (0.5d0 - y))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -24.0) {
		tmp = x * -y;
	} else {
		tmp = Math.log(2.0) + (x * (0.5 - y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -24.0:
		tmp = x * -y
	else:
		tmp = math.log(2.0) + (x * (0.5 - y))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -24.0)
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(-y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(log(2.0) + Float64(x * Float64(0.5 - y)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -24.0)
		tmp = x * -y;
	else
		tmp = log(2.0) + (x * (0.5 - y));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := If[LessEqual[x, -24.0], N[(x * (-y)), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[Log[2.0], $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * N[(0.5 - y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -24

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\log \left(1 + e^{x}\right) - x \cdot y \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. log1p-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{x}\right)} - x \cdot y \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{x}\right) - x \cdot y} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-x \cdot y} \]

      2. distribute-lft-neg-in 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-x\right) \cdot y} \]

      3. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-x\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-x\right)} \]

   if -24 < x

   1. Initial program 99.4%

      \[\log \left(1 + e^{x}\right) - x \cdot y \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. log1p-define 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{x}\right)} - x \cdot y \]

   3. Simplified 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{x}\right) - x \cdot y} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log 2 + x \cdot \left(0.5 - y\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -24:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(-y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\log 2 + x \cdot \left(0.5 - y\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 81.0% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -7 \cdot 10^{-91} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1.46 \cdot 10^{-43}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(-y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\log 2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -7e-91) (not (<= x 1.46e-43))) (* x (- y)) (log 2.0)))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -7e-91) || !(x <= 1.46e-43)) {
		tmp = x * -y;
	} else {
		tmp = log(2.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-7d-91)) .or. (.not. (x <= 1.46d-43))) then
        tmp = x * -y
    else
        tmp = log(2.0d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -7e-91) || !(x <= 1.46e-43)) {
		tmp = x * -y;
	} else {
		tmp = Math.log(2.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -7e-91) or not (x <= 1.46e-43):
		tmp = x * -y
	else:
		tmp = math.log(2.0)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -7e-91) || !(x <= 1.46e-43))
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(-y));
	else
		tmp = log(2.0);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -7e-91) || ~((x <= 1.46e-43)))
		tmp = x * -y;
	else
		tmp = log(2.0);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -7e-91], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 1.46e-43]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * (-y)), $MachinePrecision], N[Log[2.0], $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -6.9999999999999997e-91 or 1.45999999999999997e-43 < x

   1. Initial program 99.2%

      \[\log \left(1 + e^{x}\right) - x \cdot y \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. log1p-define 99.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{x}\right)} - x \cdot y \]

   3. Simplified 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{x}\right) - x \cdot y} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 90.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 90.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-x \cdot y} \]

      2. distribute-lft-neg-in 90.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-x\right) \cdot y} \]

      3. *-commutative 90.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-x\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 90.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-x\right)} \]

   if -6.9999999999999997e-91 < x < 1.45999999999999997e-43

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\log \left(1 + e^{x}\right) - x \cdot y \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. log1p-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{x}\right)} - x \cdot y \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{x}\right) - x \cdot y} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\frac{\log \left(1 + e^{x}\right)}{x} - y\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. log1p-define 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(\frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{x}\right)}}{x} - y\right) \]

   7. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{x}\right)}{x} - y\right)} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in x around 0 81.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log 2} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 86.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -7 \cdot 10^{-91} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1.46 \cdot 10^{-43}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(-y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\log 2\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 98.8% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -105:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(-y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{log1p}\left(1\right) - x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -105.0) (* x (- y)) (- (log1p 1.0) (* x y))))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -105.0) {
		tmp = x * -y;
	} else {
		tmp = log1p(1.0) - (x * y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -105.0) {
		tmp = x * -y;
	} else {
		tmp = Math.log1p(1.0) - (x * y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -105.0:
		tmp = x * -y
	else:
		tmp = math.log1p(1.0) - (x * y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -105.0)
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(-y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(log1p(1.0) - Float64(x * y));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := If[LessEqual[x, -105.0], N[(x * (-y)), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[Log[1 + 1.0], $MachinePrecision] - N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -105

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\log \left(1 + e^{x}\right) - x \cdot y \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. log1p-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{x}\right)} - x \cdot y \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{x}\right) - x \cdot y} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-x \cdot y} \]

      2. distribute-lft-neg-in 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-x\right) \cdot y} \]

      3. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-x\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-x\right)} \]

   if -105 < x

   1. Initial program 99.4%

      \[\log \left(1 + e^{x}\right) - x \cdot y \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. log1p-define 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{x}\right)} - x \cdot y \]

   3. Simplified 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{x}\right) - x \cdot y} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 99.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{1}\right) - x \cdot y \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -105:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(-y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{log1p}\left(1\right) - x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 51.8% accurate, 51.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot \left(-y\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (* x (- y)))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return x * -y;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = x * -y
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return x * -y;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	return x * -y

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return Float64(x * Float64(-y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = x * -y;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := N[(x * (-y)), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.6%

   \[\log \left(1 + e^{x}\right) - x \cdot y \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. log1p-define 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{x}\right)} - x \cdot y \]

3. Simplified 99.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{x}\right) - x \cdot y} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 55.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. neg-mul-1 55.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-x \cdot y} \]

   2. distribute-lft-neg-in 55.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-x\right) \cdot y} \]

   3. *-commutative 55.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-x\right)} \]

7. Simplified 55.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-x\right)} \]

8. Final simplification 55.9%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(-y\right) \]
9. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 2.2% accurate, 69.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (* x y))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return x * y;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = x * y
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return x * y;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	return x * y

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return Float64(x * y)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = x * y;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.6%

   \[\log \left(1 + e^{x}\right) - x \cdot y \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. log1p-define 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{x}\right)} - x \cdot y \]

3. Simplified 99.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{x}\right) - x \cdot y} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 55.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. neg-mul-1 55.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-x \cdot y} \]

   2. distribute-lft-neg-in 55.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-x\right) \cdot y} \]

   3. *-commutative 55.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-x\right)} \]

7. Simplified 55.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-x\right)} \]
8. Step-by-step derivation

   1. neg-sub0 55.9%

      \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0 - x\right)} \]

   2. sub-neg 55.9%

      \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0 + \left(-x\right)\right)} \]

   3. add-sqr-sqrt 45.5%

      \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(0 + \color{blue}{\sqrt{-x} \cdot \sqrt{-x}}\right) \]

   4. sqrt-unprod 35.3%

      \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(0 + \color{blue}{\sqrt{\left(-x\right) \cdot \left(-x\right)}}\right) \]

   5. sqr-neg 35.3%

      \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(0 + \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot x}}\right) \]

   6. sqrt-unprod 0.8%

      \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(0 + \color{blue}{\sqrt{x} \cdot \sqrt{x}}\right) \]

   7. add-sqr-sqrt 2.0%

      \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(0 + \color{blue}{x}\right) \]

9. Applied egg-rr 2.0%

   \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0 + x\right)} \]
10. Step-by-step derivation

    1. +-lft-identity 2.0%

       \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{x} \]

11. Simplified 2.0%

    \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{x} \]

12. Final simplification 2.0%

    \[\leadsto x \cdot y \]
13. Add Preprocessing

Developer Target 1: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq 0:\\ \;\;\;\;\log \left(1 + e^{x}\right) - x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\log \left(1 + e^{-x}\right) - \left(-x\right) \cdot \left(1 - y\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x 0.0)
   (- (log (+ 1.0 (exp x))) (* x y))
   (- (log (+ 1.0 (exp (- x)))) (* (- x) (- 1.0 y)))))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= 0.0) {
		tmp = log((1.0 + exp(x))) - (x * y);
	} else {
		tmp = log((1.0 + exp(-x))) - (-x * (1.0 - y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= 0.0d0) then
        tmp = log((1.0d0 + exp(x))) - (x * y)
    else
        tmp = log((1.0d0 + exp(-x))) - (-x * (1.0d0 - y))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= 0.0) {
		tmp = Math.log((1.0 + Math.exp(x))) - (x * y);
	} else {
		tmp = Math.log((1.0 + Math.exp(-x))) - (-x * (1.0 - y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= 0.0:
		tmp = math.log((1.0 + math.exp(x))) - (x * y)
	else:
		tmp = math.log((1.0 + math.exp(-x))) - (-x * (1.0 - y))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= 0.0)
		tmp = Float64(log(Float64(1.0 + exp(x))) - Float64(x * y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(log(Float64(1.0 + exp(Float64(-x)))) - Float64(Float64(-x) * Float64(1.0 - y)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= 0.0)
		tmp = log((1.0 + exp(x))) - (x * y);
	else
		tmp = log((1.0 + exp(-x))) - (-x * (1.0 - y));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := If[LessEqual[x, 0.0], N[(N[Log[N[(1.0 + N[Exp[x], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[Log[N[(1.0 + N[Exp[(-x)], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[((-x) * N[(1.0 - y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024130 
(FPCore (x y)
  :name "Logistic regression 2"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (! :herbie-platform default (if (<= x 0) (- (log (+ 1 (exp x))) (* x y)) (- (log (+ 1 (exp (- x)))) (* (- x) (- 1 y)))))

  (- (log (+ 1.0 (exp x))) (* x y)))