math.exp on complex, real part

Percentage Accurate: 100.0% → 100.0%

Time: 7.2s

Alternatives: 11

Speedup: 1.0×

• 24.8% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ e^{re} \cdot \cos im \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im) :precision binary64 (* (exp re) (cos im)))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	return exp(re) * cos(im);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    code = exp(re) * cos(im)
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	return Math.exp(re) * Math.cos(im);
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	return math.exp(re) * math.cos(im)

Julia

function code(re, im)
	return Float64(exp(re) * cos(im))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(re, im)
	tmp = exp(re) * cos(im);
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := N[(N[Exp[re], $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[im], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ e^{re} \cdot \cos im \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im) :precision binary64 (* (exp re) (cos im)))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	return exp(re) * cos(im);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    code = exp(re) * cos(im)
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	return Math.exp(re) * Math.cos(im);
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	return math.exp(re) * math.cos(im)

Julia

function code(re, im)
	return Float64(exp(re) * cos(im))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(re, im)
	tmp = exp(re) * cos(im);
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := N[(N[Exp[re], $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[im], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ e^{re} \cdot \cos im \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im) :precision binary64 (* (exp re) (cos im)))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	return exp(re) * cos(im);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    code = exp(re) * cos(im)
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	return Math.exp(re) * Math.cos(im);
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	return math.exp(re) * math.cos(im)

Julia

function code(re, im)
	return Float64(exp(re) * cos(im))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(re, im)
	tmp = exp(re) * cos(im);
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := N[(N[Exp[re], $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[im], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[e^{re} \cdot \cos im \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 71.0% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;e^{re} \leq 1 \lor \neg \left(e^{re} \leq 2\right):\\ \;\;\;\;e^{re}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;re + \cos im\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (exp re) 1.0) (not (<= (exp re) 2.0))) (exp re) (+ re (cos im))))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if ((exp(re) <= 1.0) || !(exp(re) <= 2.0)) {
		tmp = exp(re);
	} else {
		tmp = re + cos(im);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((exp(re) <= 1.0d0) .or. (.not. (exp(re) <= 2.0d0))) then
        tmp = exp(re)
    else
        tmp = re + cos(im)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if ((Math.exp(re) <= 1.0) || !(Math.exp(re) <= 2.0)) {
		tmp = Math.exp(re);
	} else {
		tmp = re + Math.cos(im);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	tmp = 0
	if (math.exp(re) <= 1.0) or not (math.exp(re) <= 2.0):
		tmp = math.exp(re)
	else:
		tmp = re + math.cos(im)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((exp(re) <= 1.0) || !(exp(re) <= 2.0))
		tmp = exp(re);
	else
		tmp = Float64(re + cos(im));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((exp(re) <= 1.0) || ~((exp(re) <= 2.0)))
		tmp = exp(re);
	else
		tmp = re + cos(im);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[Exp[re], $MachinePrecision], 1.0], N[Not[LessEqual[N[Exp[re], $MachinePrecision], 2.0]], $MachinePrecision]], N[Exp[re], $MachinePrecision], N[(re + N[Cos[im], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (exp.f64 re) < 1 or 2 < (exp.f64 re)

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{re} \cdot \cos im \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in im around 0 72.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{re}} \]

   if 1 < (exp.f64 re) < 2

   1. Initial program 99.4%

      \[e^{re} \cdot \cos im \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in re around 0 91.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\cos im + re \cdot \cos im} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-rgt1-in 90.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(re + 1\right) \cdot \cos im} \]

   5. Simplified 90.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(re + 1\right) \cdot \cos im} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 90.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\cos im \cdot \left(re + 1\right)} \]

      2. distribute-lft-in 91.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\cos im \cdot re + \cos im \cdot 1} \]

      3. *-commutative 91.3%

         \[\leadsto \cos im \cdot re + \color{blue}{1 \cdot \cos im} \]

      4. *-un-lft-identity 91.3%

         \[\leadsto \cos im \cdot re + \color{blue}{\cos im} \]

   7. Applied egg-rr 91.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\cos im \cdot re + \cos im} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in im around 0 80.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{re} + \cos im \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 72.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;e^{re} \leq 1 \lor \neg \left(e^{re} \leq 2\right):\\ \;\;\;\;e^{re}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;re + \cos im\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 70.9% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;e^{re} \leq 1 \lor \neg \left(e^{re} \leq 1.0000000001\right):\\ \;\;\;\;e^{re}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\cos im\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (exp re) 1.0) (not (<= (exp re) 1.0000000001)))
   (exp re)
   (cos im)))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if ((exp(re) <= 1.0) || !(exp(re) <= 1.0000000001)) {
		tmp = exp(re);
	} else {
		tmp = cos(im);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((exp(re) <= 1.0d0) .or. (.not. (exp(re) <= 1.0000000001d0))) then
        tmp = exp(re)
    else
        tmp = cos(im)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if ((Math.exp(re) <= 1.0) || !(Math.exp(re) <= 1.0000000001)) {
		tmp = Math.exp(re);
	} else {
		tmp = Math.cos(im);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	tmp = 0
	if (math.exp(re) <= 1.0) or not (math.exp(re) <= 1.0000000001):
		tmp = math.exp(re)
	else:
		tmp = math.cos(im)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((exp(re) <= 1.0) || !(exp(re) <= 1.0000000001))
		tmp = exp(re);
	else
		tmp = cos(im);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((exp(re) <= 1.0) || ~((exp(re) <= 1.0000000001)))
		tmp = exp(re);
	else
		tmp = cos(im);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[Exp[re], $MachinePrecision], 1.0], N[Not[LessEqual[N[Exp[re], $MachinePrecision], 1.0000000001]], $MachinePrecision]], N[Exp[re], $MachinePrecision], N[Cos[im], $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (exp.f64 re) < 1 or 1.0000000001 < (exp.f64 re)

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{re} \cdot \cos im \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in im around 0 72.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{re}} \]

   if 1 < (exp.f64 re) < 1.0000000001

   1. Initial program 99.0%

      \[e^{re} \cdot \cos im \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in re around 0 85.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\cos im} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 72.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;e^{re} \leq 1 \lor \neg \left(e^{re} \leq 1.0000000001\right):\\ \;\;\;\;e^{re}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\cos im\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 97.4% accurate, 1.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;re \leq -0.0105 \lor \neg \left(re \leq 0.037\right) \land re \leq 10^{+103}:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{re}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\cos im \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + re \cdot 0.16666666666666666\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= re -0.0105) (and (not (<= re 0.037)) (<= re 1e+103)))
   (exp re)
   (*
    (cos im)
    (+ 1.0 (* re (+ 1.0 (* re (+ 0.5 (* re 0.16666666666666666)))))))))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if ((re <= -0.0105) || (!(re <= 0.037) && (re <= 1e+103))) {
		tmp = exp(re);
	} else {
		tmp = cos(im) * (1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * (0.5 + (re * 0.16666666666666666))))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((re <= (-0.0105d0)) .or. (.not. (re <= 0.037d0)) .and. (re <= 1d+103)) then
        tmp = exp(re)
    else
        tmp = cos(im) * (1.0d0 + (re * (1.0d0 + (re * (0.5d0 + (re * 0.16666666666666666d0))))))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if ((re <= -0.0105) || (!(re <= 0.037) && (re <= 1e+103))) {
		tmp = Math.exp(re);
	} else {
		tmp = Math.cos(im) * (1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * (0.5 + (re * 0.16666666666666666))))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	tmp = 0
	if (re <= -0.0105) or (not (re <= 0.037) and (re <= 1e+103)):
		tmp = math.exp(re)
	else:
		tmp = math.cos(im) * (1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * (0.5 + (re * 0.16666666666666666))))))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((re <= -0.0105) || (!(re <= 0.037) && (re <= 1e+103)))
		tmp = exp(re);
	else
		tmp = Float64(cos(im) * Float64(1.0 + Float64(re * Float64(1.0 + Float64(re * Float64(0.5 + Float64(re * 0.16666666666666666)))))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((re <= -0.0105) || (~((re <= 0.037)) && (re <= 1e+103)))
		tmp = exp(re);
	else
		tmp = cos(im) * (1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * (0.5 + (re * 0.16666666666666666))))));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := If[Or[LessEqual[re, -0.0105], And[N[Not[LessEqual[re, 0.037]], $MachinePrecision], LessEqual[re, 1e+103]]], N[Exp[re], $MachinePrecision], N[(N[Cos[im], $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.0 + N[(re * N[(1.0 + N[(re * N[(0.5 + N[(re * 0.16666666666666666), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if re < -0.0105000000000000007 or 0.0369999999999999982 < re < 1e103

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{re} \cdot \cos im \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in im around 0 94.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{re}} \]

   if -0.0105000000000000007 < re < 0.0369999999999999982 or 1e103 < re

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{re} \cdot \cos im \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in re around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + 0.16666666666666666 \cdot re\right)\right)\right)} \cdot \cos im \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + \color{blue}{re \cdot 0.16666666666666666}\right)\right)\right) \cdot \cos im \]

   5. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + re \cdot 0.16666666666666666\right)\right)\right)} \cdot \cos im \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;re \leq -0.0105 \lor \neg \left(re \leq 0.037\right) \land re \leq 10^{+103}:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{re}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\cos im \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + re \cdot 0.16666666666666666\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 96.2% accurate, 1.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;re \leq -1.3 \cdot 10^{-5} \lor \neg \left(re \leq 0.0028\right) \land re \leq 1.9 \cdot 10^{+154}:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{re}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\cos im \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot 0.5\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= re -1.3e-5) (and (not (<= re 0.0028)) (<= re 1.9e+154)))
   (exp re)
   (* (cos im) (+ 1.0 (* re (+ 1.0 (* re 0.5)))))))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if ((re <= -1.3e-5) || (!(re <= 0.0028) && (re <= 1.9e+154))) {
		tmp = exp(re);
	} else {
		tmp = cos(im) * (1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * 0.5))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((re <= (-1.3d-5)) .or. (.not. (re <= 0.0028d0)) .and. (re <= 1.9d+154)) then
        tmp = exp(re)
    else
        tmp = cos(im) * (1.0d0 + (re * (1.0d0 + (re * 0.5d0))))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if ((re <= -1.3e-5) || (!(re <= 0.0028) && (re <= 1.9e+154))) {
		tmp = Math.exp(re);
	} else {
		tmp = Math.cos(im) * (1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * 0.5))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	tmp = 0
	if (re <= -1.3e-5) or (not (re <= 0.0028) and (re <= 1.9e+154)):
		tmp = math.exp(re)
	else:
		tmp = math.cos(im) * (1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * 0.5))))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((re <= -1.3e-5) || (!(re <= 0.0028) && (re <= 1.9e+154)))
		tmp = exp(re);
	else
		tmp = Float64(cos(im) * Float64(1.0 + Float64(re * Float64(1.0 + Float64(re * 0.5)))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((re <= -1.3e-5) || (~((re <= 0.0028)) && (re <= 1.9e+154)))
		tmp = exp(re);
	else
		tmp = cos(im) * (1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * 0.5))));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := If[Or[LessEqual[re, -1.3e-5], And[N[Not[LessEqual[re, 0.0028]], $MachinePrecision], LessEqual[re, 1.9e+154]]], N[Exp[re], $MachinePrecision], N[(N[Cos[im], $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.0 + N[(re * N[(1.0 + N[(re * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if re < -1.29999999999999992e-5 or 0.00279999999999999997 < re < 1.8999999999999999e154

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{re} \cdot \cos im \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in im around 0 91.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{re}} \]

   if -1.29999999999999992e-5 < re < 0.00279999999999999997 or 1.8999999999999999e154 < re

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{re} \cdot \cos im \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in re around 0 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + 0.5 \cdot re\right)\right)} \cdot \cos im \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{re \cdot 0.5}\right)\right) \cdot \cos im \]

   5. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot 0.5\right)\right)} \cdot \cos im \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 96.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;re \leq -1.3 \cdot 10^{-5} \lor \neg \left(re \leq 0.0028\right) \land re \leq 1.9 \cdot 10^{+154}:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{re}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\cos im \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot 0.5\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 93.0% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;re \leq -1.3 \cdot 10^{-5} \lor \neg \left(re \leq 0.0023\right):\\ \;\;\;\;e^{re}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\cos im \cdot \left(re + 1\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= re -1.3e-5) (not (<= re 0.0023)))
   (exp re)
   (* (cos im) (+ re 1.0))))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if ((re <= -1.3e-5) || !(re <= 0.0023)) {
		tmp = exp(re);
	} else {
		tmp = cos(im) * (re + 1.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((re <= (-1.3d-5)) .or. (.not. (re <= 0.0023d0))) then
        tmp = exp(re)
    else
        tmp = cos(im) * (re + 1.0d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if ((re <= -1.3e-5) || !(re <= 0.0023)) {
		tmp = Math.exp(re);
	} else {
		tmp = Math.cos(im) * (re + 1.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	tmp = 0
	if (re <= -1.3e-5) or not (re <= 0.0023):
		tmp = math.exp(re)
	else:
		tmp = math.cos(im) * (re + 1.0)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((re <= -1.3e-5) || !(re <= 0.0023))
		tmp = exp(re);
	else
		tmp = Float64(cos(im) * Float64(re + 1.0));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((re <= -1.3e-5) || ~((re <= 0.0023)))
		tmp = exp(re);
	else
		tmp = cos(im) * (re + 1.0);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := If[Or[LessEqual[re, -1.3e-5], N[Not[LessEqual[re, 0.0023]], $MachinePrecision]], N[Exp[re], $MachinePrecision], N[(N[Cos[im], $MachinePrecision] * N[(re + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if re < -1.29999999999999992e-5 or 0.0023 < re

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{re} \cdot \cos im \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in im around 0 88.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{re}} \]

   if -1.29999999999999992e-5 < re < 0.0023

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{re} \cdot \cos im \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in re around 0 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\cos im + re \cdot \cos im} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-rgt1-in 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(re + 1\right) \cdot \cos im} \]

   5. Simplified 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(re + 1\right) \cdot \cos im} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 94.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;re \leq -1.3 \cdot 10^{-5} \lor \neg \left(re \leq 0.0023\right):\\ \;\;\;\;e^{re}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\cos im \cdot \left(re + 1\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 62.5% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;re \leq 4.5 \cdot 10^{+44}:\\ \;\;\;\;\cos im\\ \mathbf{elif}\;re \leq 2.7 \cdot 10^{+125}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot 0.5\right)\right) \cdot \left(1 + -0.5 \cdot \left(im \cdot im\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + re \cdot 0.16666666666666666\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= re 4.5e+44)
   (cos im)
   (if (<= re 2.7e+125)
     (* (+ 1.0 (* re (+ 1.0 (* re 0.5)))) (+ 1.0 (* -0.5 (* im im))))
     (+ 1.0 (* re (+ 1.0 (* re (+ 0.5 (* re 0.16666666666666666)))))))))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if (re <= 4.5e+44) {
		tmp = cos(im);
	} else if (re <= 2.7e+125) {
		tmp = (1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * 0.5)))) * (1.0 + (-0.5 * (im * im)));
	} else {
		tmp = 1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * (0.5 + (re * 0.16666666666666666)))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (re <= 4.5d+44) then
        tmp = cos(im)
    else if (re <= 2.7d+125) then
        tmp = (1.0d0 + (re * (1.0d0 + (re * 0.5d0)))) * (1.0d0 + ((-0.5d0) * (im * im)))
    else
        tmp = 1.0d0 + (re * (1.0d0 + (re * (0.5d0 + (re * 0.16666666666666666d0)))))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if (re <= 4.5e+44) {
		tmp = Math.cos(im);
	} else if (re <= 2.7e+125) {
		tmp = (1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * 0.5)))) * (1.0 + (-0.5 * (im * im)));
	} else {
		tmp = 1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * (0.5 + (re * 0.16666666666666666)))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	tmp = 0
	if re <= 4.5e+44:
		tmp = math.cos(im)
	elif re <= 2.7e+125:
		tmp = (1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * 0.5)))) * (1.0 + (-0.5 * (im * im)))
	else:
		tmp = 1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * (0.5 + (re * 0.16666666666666666)))))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (re <= 4.5e+44)
		tmp = cos(im);
	elseif (re <= 2.7e+125)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(1.0 + Float64(re * Float64(1.0 + Float64(re * 0.5)))) * Float64(1.0 + Float64(-0.5 * Float64(im * im))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(1.0 + Float64(re * Float64(1.0 + Float64(re * Float64(0.5 + Float64(re * 0.16666666666666666))))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (re <= 4.5e+44)
		tmp = cos(im);
	elseif (re <= 2.7e+125)
		tmp = (1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * 0.5)))) * (1.0 + (-0.5 * (im * im)));
	else
		tmp = 1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * (0.5 + (re * 0.16666666666666666)))));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := If[LessEqual[re, 4.5e+44], N[Cos[im], $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[re, 2.7e+125], N[(N[(1.0 + N[(re * N[(1.0 + N[(re * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.0 + N[(-0.5 * N[(im * im), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(1.0 + N[(re * N[(1.0 + N[(re * N[(0.5 + N[(re * 0.16666666666666666), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if re < 4.5e44

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{re} \cdot \cos im \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in re around 0 63.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\cos im} \]

   if 4.5e44 < re < 2.6999999999999999e125

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{re} \cdot \cos im \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in re around 0 4.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + 0.5 \cdot re\right)\right)} \cdot \cos im \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 4.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{re \cdot 0.5}\right)\right) \cdot \cos im \]

   5. Simplified 4.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot 0.5\right)\right)} \cdot \cos im \]

   6. Taylor expanded in im around 0 35.6%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot 0.5\right)\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + -0.5 \cdot {im}^{2}\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 35.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot 0.5\right)\right) \cdot \left(1 + -0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(im \cdot im\right)}\right) \]

   8. Applied egg-rr 35.6%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot 0.5\right)\right) \cdot \left(1 + -0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(im \cdot im\right)}\right) \]

   if 2.6999999999999999e125 < re

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{re} \cdot \cos im \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in im around 0 81.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{re}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in re around 0 81.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + 0.16666666666666666 \cdot re\right)\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + \color{blue}{re \cdot 0.16666666666666666}\right)\right)\right) \cdot \cos im \]

   6. Simplified 81.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + re \cdot 0.16666666666666666\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 40.6% accurate, 15.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + re \cdot 0.16666666666666666\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (+ 1.0 (* re (+ 1.0 (* re (+ 0.5 (* re 0.16666666666666666)))))))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	return 1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * (0.5 + (re * 0.16666666666666666)))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    code = 1.0d0 + (re * (1.0d0 + (re * (0.5d0 + (re * 0.16666666666666666d0)))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	return 1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * (0.5 + (re * 0.16666666666666666)))));
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	return 1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * (0.5 + (re * 0.16666666666666666)))))

Julia

function code(re, im)
	return Float64(1.0 + Float64(re * Float64(1.0 + Float64(re * Float64(0.5 + Float64(re * 0.16666666666666666))))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(re, im)
	tmp = 1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * (0.5 + (re * 0.16666666666666666)))));
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := N[(1.0 + N[(re * N[(1.0 + N[(re * N[(0.5 + N[(re * 0.16666666666666666), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[e^{re} \cdot \cos im \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in im around 0 71.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{re}} \]

4. Taylor expanded in re around 0 39.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + 0.16666666666666666 \cdot re\right)\right)} \]
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 66.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + \color{blue}{re \cdot 0.16666666666666666}\right)\right)\right) \cdot \cos im \]

6. Simplified 39.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + re \cdot 0.16666666666666666\right)\right)} \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 37.4% accurate, 22.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot 0.5\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im) :precision binary64 (+ 1.0 (* re (+ 1.0 (* re 0.5)))))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	return 1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * 0.5)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    code = 1.0d0 + (re * (1.0d0 + (re * 0.5d0)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	return 1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * 0.5)));
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	return 1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * 0.5)))

Julia

function code(re, im)
	return Float64(1.0 + Float64(re * Float64(1.0 + Float64(re * 0.5))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(re, im)
	tmp = 1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * 0.5)));
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := N[(1.0 + N[(re * N[(1.0 + N[(re * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[e^{re} \cdot \cos im \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in im around 0 71.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{re}} \]

4. Taylor expanded in re around 0 37.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 + re \cdot \left(1 + 0.5 \cdot re\right)} \]
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 62.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{re \cdot 0.5}\right)\right) \cdot \cos im \]

6. Simplified 37.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot 0.5\right)} \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 28.3% accurate, 67.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ re + 1 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im) :precision binary64 (+ re 1.0))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	return re + 1.0;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    code = re + 1.0d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	return re + 1.0;
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	return re + 1.0

Julia

function code(re, im)
	return Float64(re + 1.0)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(re, im)
	tmp = re + 1.0;
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := N[(re + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[e^{re} \cdot \cos im \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in re around 0 50.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\cos im + re \cdot \cos im} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. distribute-rgt1-in 50.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(re + 1\right) \cdot \cos im} \]

5. Simplified 50.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(re + 1\right) \cdot \cos im} \]

6. Taylor expanded in im around 0 28.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 + re} \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 28.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{re + 1} \]

8. Simplified 28.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{re + 1} \]
9. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 27.9% accurate, 203.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 1 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im) :precision binary64 1.0)

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	return 1.0;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    code = 1.0d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	return 1.0;
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	return 1.0

Julia

function code(re, im)
	return 1.0
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(re, im)
	tmp = 1.0;
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := 1.0

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[e^{re} \cdot \cos im \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in im around 0 71.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{re}} \]

4. Taylor expanded in re around 0 27.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024130 
(FPCore (re im)
  :name "math.exp on complex, real part"
  :precision binary64
  (* (exp re) (cos im)))