Linear.V4:$cdot from linear-1.19.1.3, C

Percentage Accurate: 95.9% → 98.7%

Time: 12.2s

Alternatives: 17

Speedup: 0.4×

• 41.3% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (+ (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* a b)) (* c i)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) + Float64(a * b)) + Float64(c * i))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 95.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (+ (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* a b)) (* c i)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) + Float64(a * b)) + Float64(c * i))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 98.7% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\left(a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\right) + c \cdot i \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(x + \left(a \cdot \frac{b}{y} + c \cdot \frac{i}{y}\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (+ (+ (* a b) (+ (* x y) (* z t))) (* c i)) INFINITY)
   (+ (fma x y (* z t)) (+ (* a b) (* c i)))
   (* y (+ x (+ (* a (/ b y)) (* c (/ i y)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((((a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t))) + (c * i)) <= ((double) INFINITY)) {
		tmp = fma(x, y, (z * t)) + ((a * b) + (c * i));
	} else {
		tmp = y * (x + ((a * (b / y)) + (c * (i / y))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t))) + Float64(c * i)) <= Inf)
		tmp = Float64(fma(x, y, Float64(z * t)) + Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(c * i)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(x + Float64(Float64(a * Float64(b / y)) + Float64(c * Float64(i / y)))));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[N[(N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], Infinity], N[(N[(x * y + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(y * N[(x + N[(N[(a * N[(b / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c * N[(i / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (+.f64 (+.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (*.f64 z t)) (*.f64 a b)) (*.f64 c i)) < +inf.0

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   if +inf.0 < (+.f64 (+.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (*.f64 z t)) (*.f64 a b)) (*.f64 c i))

   1. Initial program 0.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 0.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 9.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right) \]

   3. Simplified 9.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 18.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around inf 45.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + \left(\frac{a \cdot b}{y} + \frac{c \cdot i}{y}\right)\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 63.6%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(x + \left(\color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{b}{y}} + \frac{c \cdot i}{y}\right)\right) \]

      2. associate-/l* 72.7%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(x + \left(a \cdot \frac{b}{y} + \color{blue}{c \cdot \frac{i}{y}}\right)\right) \]

   8. Simplified 72.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + \left(a \cdot \frac{b}{y} + c \cdot \frac{i}{y}\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\left(a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\right) + c \cdot i \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(x + \left(a \cdot \frac{b}{y} + c \cdot \frac{i}{y}\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 97.9% accurate, 0.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (fma c i (fma a b (fma x y (* z t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return fma(c, i, fma(a, b, fma(x, y, (z * t))));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return fma(c, i, fma(a, b, fma(x, y, Float64(z * t))))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(c * i + N[(a * b + N[(x * y + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 95.7%

   \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 95.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

   2. fma-define 96.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. +-commutative 96.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

   4. fma-define 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

   5. fma-define 98.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

3. Simplified 98.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 98.7% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \left(a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\right) + c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_1 \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(x + \left(a \cdot \frac{b}{y} + c \cdot \frac{i}{y}\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ (+ (* a b) (+ (* x y) (* z t))) (* c i))))
   (if (<= t_1 INFINITY) t_1 (* y (+ x (+ (* a (/ b y)) (* c (/ i y))))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = ((a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t))) + (c * i);
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= ((double) INFINITY)) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = y * (x + ((a * (b / y)) + (c * (i / y))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = ((a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t))) + (c * i);
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= Double.POSITIVE_INFINITY) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = y * (x + ((a * (b / y)) + (c * (i / y))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	t_1 = ((a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t))) + (c * i)
	tmp = 0
	if t_1 <= math.inf:
		tmp = t_1
	else:
		tmp = y * (x + ((a * (b / y)) + (c * (i / y))))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t))) + Float64(c * i))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_1 <= Inf)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(x + Float64(Float64(a * Float64(b / y)) + Float64(c * Float64(i / y)))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = ((a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t))) + (c * i);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t_1 <= Inf)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = y * (x + ((a * (b / y)) + (c * (i / y))));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$1, Infinity], t$95$1, N[(y * N[(x + N[(N[(a * N[(b / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c * N[(i / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (+.f64 (+.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (*.f64 z t)) (*.f64 a b)) (*.f64 c i)) < +inf.0

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   if +inf.0 < (+.f64 (+.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (*.f64 z t)) (*.f64 a b)) (*.f64 c i))

   1. Initial program 0.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 0.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 9.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right) \]

   3. Simplified 9.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 18.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around inf 45.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + \left(\frac{a \cdot b}{y} + \frac{c \cdot i}{y}\right)\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 63.6%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(x + \left(\color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{b}{y}} + \frac{c \cdot i}{y}\right)\right) \]

      2. associate-/l* 72.7%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(x + \left(a \cdot \frac{b}{y} + \color{blue}{c \cdot \frac{i}{y}}\right)\right) \]

   8. Simplified 72.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + \left(a \cdot \frac{b}{y} + c \cdot \frac{i}{y}\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\left(a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\right) + c \cdot i \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\right) + c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(x + \left(a \cdot \frac{b}{y} + c \cdot \frac{i}{y}\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 42.4% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \cdot b \leq -9.8 \cdot 10^{+66}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \cdot b \leq -4.6 \cdot 10^{-113}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \cdot b \leq 1.3 \cdot 10^{-55}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \cdot b \leq 1.35 \cdot 10^{+165}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* a b) -9.8e+66)
   (* a b)
   (if (<= (* a b) -4.6e-113)
     (* z t)
     (if (<= (* a b) 1.3e-55)
       (* c i)
       (if (<= (* a b) 1.35e+165) (* z t) (* a b))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((a * b) <= -9.8e+66) {
		tmp = a * b;
	} else if ((a * b) <= -4.6e-113) {
		tmp = z * t;
	} else if ((a * b) <= 1.3e-55) {
		tmp = c * i;
	} else if ((a * b) <= 1.35e+165) {
		tmp = z * t;
	} else {
		tmp = a * b;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((a * b) <= (-9.8d+66)) then
        tmp = a * b
    else if ((a * b) <= (-4.6d-113)) then
        tmp = z * t
    else if ((a * b) <= 1.3d-55) then
        tmp = c * i
    else if ((a * b) <= 1.35d+165) then
        tmp = z * t
    else
        tmp = a * b
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((a * b) <= -9.8e+66) {
		tmp = a * b;
	} else if ((a * b) <= -4.6e-113) {
		tmp = z * t;
	} else if ((a * b) <= 1.3e-55) {
		tmp = c * i;
	} else if ((a * b) <= 1.35e+165) {
		tmp = z * t;
	} else {
		tmp = a * b;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if (a * b) <= -9.8e+66:
		tmp = a * b
	elif (a * b) <= -4.6e-113:
		tmp = z * t
	elif (a * b) <= 1.3e-55:
		tmp = c * i
	elif (a * b) <= 1.35e+165:
		tmp = z * t
	else:
		tmp = a * b
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(a * b) <= -9.8e+66)
		tmp = Float64(a * b);
	elseif (Float64(a * b) <= -4.6e-113)
		tmp = Float64(z * t);
	elseif (Float64(a * b) <= 1.3e-55)
		tmp = Float64(c * i);
	elseif (Float64(a * b) <= 1.35e+165)
		tmp = Float64(z * t);
	else
		tmp = Float64(a * b);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((a * b) <= -9.8e+66)
		tmp = a * b;
	elseif ((a * b) <= -4.6e-113)
		tmp = z * t;
	elseif ((a * b) <= 1.3e-55)
		tmp = c * i;
	elseif ((a * b) <= 1.35e+165)
		tmp = z * t;
	else
		tmp = a * b;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], -9.8e+66], N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], -4.6e-113], N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], 1.3e-55], N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], 1.35e+165], N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision], N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 a b) < -9.7999999999999995e66 or 1.35e165 < (*.f64 a b)

   1. Initial program 91.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 91.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 95.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 95.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 97.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 97.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 97.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around inf 64.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b} \]

   if -9.7999999999999995e66 < (*.f64 a b) < -4.60000000000000016e-113 or 1.2999999999999999e-55 < (*.f64 a b) < 1.35e165

   1. Initial program 98.6%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 98.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 98.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 98.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 98.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 70.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in i around inf 65.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot \left(c + \left(\frac{a \cdot b}{i} + \frac{t \cdot z}{i}\right)\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+r+ 65.8%

         \[\leadsto i \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(c + \frac{a \cdot b}{i}\right) + \frac{t \cdot z}{i}\right)} \]

   8. Simplified 65.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot \left(\left(c + \frac{a \cdot b}{i}\right) + \frac{t \cdot z}{i}\right)} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in t around inf 42.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]

   if -4.60000000000000016e-113 < (*.f64 a b) < 1.2999999999999999e-55

   1. Initial program 96.8%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 96.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 96.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 96.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 96.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 96.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 96.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in c around inf 40.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 49.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \cdot b \leq -9.8 \cdot 10^{+66}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \cdot b \leq -4.6 \cdot 10^{-113}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \cdot b \leq 1.3 \cdot 10^{-55}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \cdot b \leq 1.35 \cdot 10^{+165}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 65.9% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+230}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(x + \frac{c \cdot i}{y}\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 10^{-280}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 10^{+86}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + c \cdot i\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* x y) -1e+230)
   (* y (+ x (/ (* c i) y)))
   (if (<= (* x y) 1e-280)
     (+ (* c i) (* z t))
     (if (<= (* x y) 1e+86) (+ (* a b) (* z t)) (+ (* x y) (* c i))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -1e+230) {
		tmp = y * (x + ((c * i) / y));
	} else if ((x * y) <= 1e-280) {
		tmp = (c * i) + (z * t);
	} else if ((x * y) <= 1e+86) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	} else {
		tmp = (x * y) + (c * i);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x * y) <= (-1d+230)) then
        tmp = y * (x + ((c * i) / y))
    else if ((x * y) <= 1d-280) then
        tmp = (c * i) + (z * t)
    else if ((x * y) <= 1d+86) then
        tmp = (a * b) + (z * t)
    else
        tmp = (x * y) + (c * i)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -1e+230) {
		tmp = y * (x + ((c * i) / y));
	} else if ((x * y) <= 1e-280) {
		tmp = (c * i) + (z * t);
	} else if ((x * y) <= 1e+86) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	} else {
		tmp = (x * y) + (c * i);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if (x * y) <= -1e+230:
		tmp = y * (x + ((c * i) / y))
	elif (x * y) <= 1e-280:
		tmp = (c * i) + (z * t)
	elif (x * y) <= 1e+86:
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t)
	else:
		tmp = (x * y) + (c * i)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(x * y) <= -1e+230)
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(x + Float64(Float64(c * i) / y)));
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= 1e-280)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(c * i) + Float64(z * t));
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= 1e+86)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(z * t));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(c * i));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x * y) <= -1e+230)
		tmp = y * (x + ((c * i) / y));
	elseif ((x * y) <= 1e-280)
		tmp = (c * i) + (z * t);
	elseif ((x * y) <= 1e+86)
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	else
		tmp = (x * y) + (c * i);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -1e+230], N[(y * N[(x + N[(N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 1e-280], N[(N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 1e+86], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 4 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -1.0000000000000001e230

   1. Initial program 82.4%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 82.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 82.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 82.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 85.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 88.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 88.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around 0 82.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around 0 82.6%

      \[\leadsto c \cdot i + \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in y around inf 91.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + \frac{c \cdot i}{y}\right)} \]

   if -1.0000000000000001e230 < (*.f64 x y) < 9.9999999999999996e-281

   1. Initial program 97.4%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 97.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 99.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 99.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 99.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 99.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 87.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in a around 0 65.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + t \cdot z} \]

   if 9.9999999999999996e-281 < (*.f64 x y) < 1e86

   1. Initial program 98.3%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 98.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 94.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in c around 0 78.7%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]

   if 1e86 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 97.7%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 97.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 97.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 97.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around 0 91.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around 0 85.3%

      \[\leadsto c \cdot i + \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
3. Recombined 4 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 75.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+230}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(x + \frac{c \cdot i}{y}\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 10^{-280}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 10^{+86}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + c \cdot i\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 65.9% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := x \cdot y + c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -6.4 \cdot 10^{+219}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 4.5 \cdot 10^{-280}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 1.45 \cdot 10^{+91}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ (* x y) (* c i))))
   (if (<= (* x y) -6.4e+219)
     t_1
     (if (<= (* x y) 4.5e-280)
       (+ (* c i) (* z t))
       (if (<= (* x y) 1.45e+91) (+ (* a b) (* z t)) t_1)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = (x * y) + (c * i);
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -6.4e+219) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if ((x * y) <= 4.5e-280) {
		tmp = (c * i) + (z * t);
	} else if ((x * y) <= 1.45e+91) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = (x * y) + (c * i)
    if ((x * y) <= (-6.4d+219)) then
        tmp = t_1
    else if ((x * y) <= 4.5d-280) then
        tmp = (c * i) + (z * t)
    else if ((x * y) <= 1.45d+91) then
        tmp = (a * b) + (z * t)
    else
        tmp = t_1
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = (x * y) + (c * i);
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -6.4e+219) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if ((x * y) <= 4.5e-280) {
		tmp = (c * i) + (z * t);
	} else if ((x * y) <= 1.45e+91) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	t_1 = (x * y) + (c * i)
	tmp = 0
	if (x * y) <= -6.4e+219:
		tmp = t_1
	elif (x * y) <= 4.5e-280:
		tmp = (c * i) + (z * t)
	elif (x * y) <= 1.45e+91:
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t)
	else:
		tmp = t_1
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(c * i))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(x * y) <= -6.4e+219)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= 4.5e-280)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(c * i) + Float64(z * t));
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= 1.45e+91)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(z * t));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = (x * y) + (c * i);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x * y) <= -6.4e+219)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif ((x * y) <= 4.5e-280)
		tmp = (c * i) + (z * t);
	elseif ((x * y) <= 1.45e+91)
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -6.4e+219], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 4.5e-280], N[(N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 1.45e+91], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -6.40000000000000053e219 or 1.45000000000000007e91 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 91.1%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 91.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 91.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 91.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 93.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 94.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 94.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around 0 87.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around 0 84.2%

      \[\leadsto c \cdot i + \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]

   if -6.40000000000000053e219 < (*.f64 x y) < 4.4999999999999996e-280

   1. Initial program 97.4%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 97.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 99.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 99.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 99.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 99.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 87.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in a around 0 65.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + t \cdot z} \]

   if 4.4999999999999996e-280 < (*.f64 x y) < 1.45000000000000007e91

   1. Initial program 98.3%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 98.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 94.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in c around 0 78.7%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 74.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -6.4 \cdot 10^{+219}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 4.5 \cdot 10^{-280}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 1.45 \cdot 10^{+91}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + c \cdot i\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 66.7% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := x \cdot y + a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -1.04 \cdot 10^{+170}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 6.8 \cdot 10^{-280}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 9 \cdot 10^{+88}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ (* x y) (* a b))))
   (if (<= (* x y) -1.04e+170)
     t_1
     (if (<= (* x y) 6.8e-280)
       (+ (* c i) (* z t))
       (if (<= (* x y) 9e+88) (+ (* a b) (* z t)) t_1)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = (x * y) + (a * b);
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -1.04e+170) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if ((x * y) <= 6.8e-280) {
		tmp = (c * i) + (z * t);
	} else if ((x * y) <= 9e+88) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = (x * y) + (a * b)
    if ((x * y) <= (-1.04d+170)) then
        tmp = t_1
    else if ((x * y) <= 6.8d-280) then
        tmp = (c * i) + (z * t)
    else if ((x * y) <= 9d+88) then
        tmp = (a * b) + (z * t)
    else
        tmp = t_1
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = (x * y) + (a * b);
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -1.04e+170) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if ((x * y) <= 6.8e-280) {
		tmp = (c * i) + (z * t);
	} else if ((x * y) <= 9e+88) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	t_1 = (x * y) + (a * b)
	tmp = 0
	if (x * y) <= -1.04e+170:
		tmp = t_1
	elif (x * y) <= 6.8e-280:
		tmp = (c * i) + (z * t)
	elif (x * y) <= 9e+88:
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t)
	else:
		tmp = t_1
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(a * b))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(x * y) <= -1.04e+170)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= 6.8e-280)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(c * i) + Float64(z * t));
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= 9e+88)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(z * t));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = (x * y) + (a * b);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x * y) <= -1.04e+170)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif ((x * y) <= 6.8e-280)
		tmp = (c * i) + (z * t);
	elseif ((x * y) <= 9e+88)
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -1.04e+170], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 6.8e-280], N[(N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 9e+88], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -1.04e170 or 9e88 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 91.6%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 91.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 92.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right) \]

   3. Simplified 92.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 87.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in c around 0 78.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + x \cdot y} \]

   if -1.04e170 < (*.f64 x y) < 6.7999999999999995e-280

   1. Initial program 97.3%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 97.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 99.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 99.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 99.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 99.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 88.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in a around 0 66.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + t \cdot z} \]

   if 6.7999999999999995e-280 < (*.f64 x y) < 9e88

   1. Initial program 98.3%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 98.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 94.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in c around 0 78.7%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 73.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -1.04 \cdot 10^{+170}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 6.8 \cdot 10^{-280}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 9 \cdot 10^{+88}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + a \cdot b\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 87.8% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+230}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(x + \left(a \cdot \frac{b}{y} + c \cdot \frac{i}{y}\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 10^{+86}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* x y) -1e+230)
   (* y (+ x (+ (* a (/ b y)) (* c (/ i y)))))
   (if (<= (* x y) 1e+86)
     (+ (* a b) (+ (* c i) (* z t)))
     (+ (* x y) (+ (* a b) (* c i))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -1e+230) {
		tmp = y * (x + ((a * (b / y)) + (c * (i / y))));
	} else if ((x * y) <= 1e+86) {
		tmp = (a * b) + ((c * i) + (z * t));
	} else {
		tmp = (x * y) + ((a * b) + (c * i));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x * y) <= (-1d+230)) then
        tmp = y * (x + ((a * (b / y)) + (c * (i / y))))
    else if ((x * y) <= 1d+86) then
        tmp = (a * b) + ((c * i) + (z * t))
    else
        tmp = (x * y) + ((a * b) + (c * i))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -1e+230) {
		tmp = y * (x + ((a * (b / y)) + (c * (i / y))));
	} else if ((x * y) <= 1e+86) {
		tmp = (a * b) + ((c * i) + (z * t));
	} else {
		tmp = (x * y) + ((a * b) + (c * i));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if (x * y) <= -1e+230:
		tmp = y * (x + ((a * (b / y)) + (c * (i / y))))
	elif (x * y) <= 1e+86:
		tmp = (a * b) + ((c * i) + (z * t))
	else:
		tmp = (x * y) + ((a * b) + (c * i))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(x * y) <= -1e+230)
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(x + Float64(Float64(a * Float64(b / y)) + Float64(c * Float64(i / y)))));
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= 1e+86)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(Float64(c * i) + Float64(z * t)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(c * i)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x * y) <= -1e+230)
		tmp = y * (x + ((a * (b / y)) + (c * (i / y))));
	elseif ((x * y) <= 1e+86)
		tmp = (a * b) + ((c * i) + (z * t));
	else
		tmp = (x * y) + ((a * b) + (c * i));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -1e+230], N[(y * N[(x + N[(N[(a * N[(b / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c * N[(i / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 1e+86], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -1.0000000000000001e230

   1. Initial program 82.4%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 82.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 85.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right) \]

   3. Simplified 85.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 82.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around inf 91.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + \left(\frac{a \cdot b}{y} + \frac{c \cdot i}{y}\right)\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 94.1%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(x + \left(\color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{b}{y}} + \frac{c \cdot i}{y}\right)\right) \]

      2. associate-/l* 91.4%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(x + \left(a \cdot \frac{b}{y} + \color{blue}{c \cdot \frac{i}{y}}\right)\right) \]

   8. Simplified 91.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + \left(a \cdot \frac{b}{y} + c \cdot \frac{i}{y}\right)\right)} \]

   if -1.0000000000000001e230 < (*.f64 x y) < 1e86

   1. Initial program 97.7%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 97.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 90.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

   if 1e86 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 97.7%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 97.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 97.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right) \]

   3. Simplified 97.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 91.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right) \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 90.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+230}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(x + \left(a \cdot \frac{b}{y} + c \cdot \frac{i}{y}\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 10^{+86}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 86.8% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+230}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(x + \frac{c \cdot i}{y}\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 10^{+86}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* x y) -1e+230)
   (* y (+ x (/ (* c i) y)))
   (if (<= (* x y) 1e+86)
     (+ (* a b) (+ (* c i) (* z t)))
     (+ (* x y) (+ (* a b) (* c i))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -1e+230) {
		tmp = y * (x + ((c * i) / y));
	} else if ((x * y) <= 1e+86) {
		tmp = (a * b) + ((c * i) + (z * t));
	} else {
		tmp = (x * y) + ((a * b) + (c * i));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x * y) <= (-1d+230)) then
        tmp = y * (x + ((c * i) / y))
    else if ((x * y) <= 1d+86) then
        tmp = (a * b) + ((c * i) + (z * t))
    else
        tmp = (x * y) + ((a * b) + (c * i))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -1e+230) {
		tmp = y * (x + ((c * i) / y));
	} else if ((x * y) <= 1e+86) {
		tmp = (a * b) + ((c * i) + (z * t));
	} else {
		tmp = (x * y) + ((a * b) + (c * i));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if (x * y) <= -1e+230:
		tmp = y * (x + ((c * i) / y))
	elif (x * y) <= 1e+86:
		tmp = (a * b) + ((c * i) + (z * t))
	else:
		tmp = (x * y) + ((a * b) + (c * i))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(x * y) <= -1e+230)
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(x + Float64(Float64(c * i) / y)));
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= 1e+86)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(Float64(c * i) + Float64(z * t)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(c * i)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x * y) <= -1e+230)
		tmp = y * (x + ((c * i) / y));
	elseif ((x * y) <= 1e+86)
		tmp = (a * b) + ((c * i) + (z * t));
	else
		tmp = (x * y) + ((a * b) + (c * i));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -1e+230], N[(y * N[(x + N[(N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 1e+86], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -1.0000000000000001e230

   1. Initial program 82.4%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 82.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 82.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 82.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 85.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 88.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 88.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around 0 82.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around 0 82.6%

      \[\leadsto c \cdot i + \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in y around inf 91.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + \frac{c \cdot i}{y}\right)} \]

   if -1.0000000000000001e230 < (*.f64 x y) < 1e86

   1. Initial program 97.7%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 97.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 90.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

   if 1e86 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 97.7%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 97.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 97.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right) \]

   3. Simplified 97.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 91.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right) \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 90.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+230}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(x + \frac{c \cdot i}{y}\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 10^{+86}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 86.7% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+230}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(x + \frac{c \cdot i}{y}\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 10^{+59}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* x y) -1e+230)
   (* y (+ x (/ (* c i) y)))
   (if (<= (* x y) 1e+59)
     (+ (* a b) (+ (* c i) (* z t)))
     (+ (* c i) (+ (* x y) (* z t))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -1e+230) {
		tmp = y * (x + ((c * i) / y));
	} else if ((x * y) <= 1e+59) {
		tmp = (a * b) + ((c * i) + (z * t));
	} else {
		tmp = (c * i) + ((x * y) + (z * t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x * y) <= (-1d+230)) then
        tmp = y * (x + ((c * i) / y))
    else if ((x * y) <= 1d+59) then
        tmp = (a * b) + ((c * i) + (z * t))
    else
        tmp = (c * i) + ((x * y) + (z * t))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -1e+230) {
		tmp = y * (x + ((c * i) / y));
	} else if ((x * y) <= 1e+59) {
		tmp = (a * b) + ((c * i) + (z * t));
	} else {
		tmp = (c * i) + ((x * y) + (z * t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if (x * y) <= -1e+230:
		tmp = y * (x + ((c * i) / y))
	elif (x * y) <= 1e+59:
		tmp = (a * b) + ((c * i) + (z * t))
	else:
		tmp = (c * i) + ((x * y) + (z * t))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(x * y) <= -1e+230)
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(x + Float64(Float64(c * i) / y)));
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= 1e+59)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(Float64(c * i) + Float64(z * t)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(c * i) + Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x * y) <= -1e+230)
		tmp = y * (x + ((c * i) / y));
	elseif ((x * y) <= 1e+59)
		tmp = (a * b) + ((c * i) + (z * t));
	else
		tmp = (c * i) + ((x * y) + (z * t));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -1e+230], N[(y * N[(x + N[(N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 1e+59], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -1.0000000000000001e230

   1. Initial program 82.4%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 82.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 82.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 82.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 85.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 88.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 88.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around 0 82.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around 0 82.6%

      \[\leadsto c \cdot i + \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in y around inf 91.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + \frac{c \cdot i}{y}\right)} \]

   if -1.0000000000000001e230 < (*.f64 x y) < 9.99999999999999972e58

   1. Initial program 97.7%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 97.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 90.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

   if 9.99999999999999972e58 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 97.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 97.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 97.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 97.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around 0 91.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 90.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+230}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(x + \frac{c \cdot i}{y}\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 10^{+59}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 84.9% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+230}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(x + \frac{c \cdot i}{y}\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+221}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + c \cdot i\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* x y) -1e+230)
   (* y (+ x (/ (* c i) y)))
   (if (<= (* x y) 2e+221)
     (+ (* a b) (+ (* c i) (* z t)))
     (+ (* x y) (* c i)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -1e+230) {
		tmp = y * (x + ((c * i) / y));
	} else if ((x * y) <= 2e+221) {
		tmp = (a * b) + ((c * i) + (z * t));
	} else {
		tmp = (x * y) + (c * i);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x * y) <= (-1d+230)) then
        tmp = y * (x + ((c * i) / y))
    else if ((x * y) <= 2d+221) then
        tmp = (a * b) + ((c * i) + (z * t))
    else
        tmp = (x * y) + (c * i)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -1e+230) {
		tmp = y * (x + ((c * i) / y));
	} else if ((x * y) <= 2e+221) {
		tmp = (a * b) + ((c * i) + (z * t));
	} else {
		tmp = (x * y) + (c * i);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if (x * y) <= -1e+230:
		tmp = y * (x + ((c * i) / y))
	elif (x * y) <= 2e+221:
		tmp = (a * b) + ((c * i) + (z * t))
	else:
		tmp = (x * y) + (c * i)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(x * y) <= -1e+230)
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(x + Float64(Float64(c * i) / y)));
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= 2e+221)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(Float64(c * i) + Float64(z * t)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(c * i));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x * y) <= -1e+230)
		tmp = y * (x + ((c * i) / y));
	elseif ((x * y) <= 2e+221)
		tmp = (a * b) + ((c * i) + (z * t));
	else
		tmp = (x * y) + (c * i);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -1e+230], N[(y * N[(x + N[(N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 2e+221], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -1.0000000000000001e230

   1. Initial program 82.4%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 82.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 82.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 82.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 85.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 88.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 88.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around 0 82.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around 0 82.6%

      \[\leadsto c \cdot i + \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in y around inf 91.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + \frac{c \cdot i}{y}\right)} \]

   if -1.0000000000000001e230 < (*.f64 x y) < 2.0000000000000001e221

   1. Initial program 97.8%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 97.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 99.5%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 99.5%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 88.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

   if 2.0000000000000001e221 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 96.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 96.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 96.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 96.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around 0 94.7%

      \[\leadsto c \cdot i + \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 89.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+230}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(x + \frac{c \cdot i}{y}\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+221}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + c \cdot i\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 12: 42.6% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -6.4 \cdot 10^{+219}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 9 \cdot 10^{-226}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 9 \cdot 10^{+85}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* x y) -6.4e+219)
   (* x y)
   (if (<= (* x y) 9e-226) (* z t) (if (<= (* x y) 9e+85) (* a b) (* x y)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -6.4e+219) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else if ((x * y) <= 9e-226) {
		tmp = z * t;
	} else if ((x * y) <= 9e+85) {
		tmp = a * b;
	} else {
		tmp = x * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x * y) <= (-6.4d+219)) then
        tmp = x * y
    else if ((x * y) <= 9d-226) then
        tmp = z * t
    else if ((x * y) <= 9d+85) then
        tmp = a * b
    else
        tmp = x * y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -6.4e+219) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else if ((x * y) <= 9e-226) {
		tmp = z * t;
	} else if ((x * y) <= 9e+85) {
		tmp = a * b;
	} else {
		tmp = x * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if (x * y) <= -6.4e+219:
		tmp = x * y
	elif (x * y) <= 9e-226:
		tmp = z * t
	elif (x * y) <= 9e+85:
		tmp = a * b
	else:
		tmp = x * y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(x * y) <= -6.4e+219)
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= 9e-226)
		tmp = Float64(z * t);
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= 9e+85)
		tmp = Float64(a * b);
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x * y) <= -6.4e+219)
		tmp = x * y;
	elseif ((x * y) <= 9e-226)
		tmp = z * t;
	elseif ((x * y) <= 9e+85)
		tmp = a * b;
	else
		tmp = x * y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -6.4e+219], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 9e-226], N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 9e+85], N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -6.40000000000000053e219 or 9.00000000000000013e85 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 91.1%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 91.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 92.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right) \]

   3. Simplified 92.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 87.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around inf 75.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]

   if -6.40000000000000053e219 < (*.f64 x y) < 9.00000000000000023e-226

   1. Initial program 97.5%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 97.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 99.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 99.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 99.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 99.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 88.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in i around inf 81.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot \left(c + \left(\frac{a \cdot b}{i} + \frac{t \cdot z}{i}\right)\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+r+ 81.4%

         \[\leadsto i \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(c + \frac{a \cdot b}{i}\right) + \frac{t \cdot z}{i}\right)} \]

   8. Simplified 81.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot \left(\left(c + \frac{a \cdot b}{i}\right) + \frac{t \cdot z}{i}\right)} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in t around inf 35.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]

   if 9.00000000000000023e-226 < (*.f64 x y) < 9.00000000000000013e85

   1. Initial program 98.1%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 98.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around inf 47.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 50.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -6.4 \cdot 10^{+219}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 9 \cdot 10^{-226}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 9 \cdot 10^{+85}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 13: 62.9% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -1.25 \cdot 10^{+225} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq 1.25 \cdot 10^{+221}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* x y) -1.25e+225) (not (<= (* x y) 1.25e+221)))
   (* x y)
   (+ (* a b) (* z t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x * y) <= -1.25e+225) || !((x * y) <= 1.25e+221)) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((x * y) <= (-1.25d+225)) .or. (.not. ((x * y) <= 1.25d+221))) then
        tmp = x * y
    else
        tmp = (a * b) + (z * t)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x * y) <= -1.25e+225) || !((x * y) <= 1.25e+221)) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if ((x * y) <= -1.25e+225) or not ((x * y) <= 1.25e+221):
		tmp = x * y
	else:
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(x * y) <= -1.25e+225) || !(Float64(x * y) <= 1.25e+221))
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(z * t));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((x * y) <= -1.25e+225) || ~(((x * y) <= 1.25e+221)))
		tmp = x * y;
	else
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -1.25e+225], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 1.25e+221]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -1.24999999999999995e225 or 1.2500000000000001e221 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 89.5%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 89.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 91.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right) \]

   3. Simplified 91.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 86.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around inf 82.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]

   if -1.24999999999999995e225 < (*.f64 x y) < 1.2500000000000001e221

   1. Initial program 97.8%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 97.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 99.5%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 99.5%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 88.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in c around 0 64.7%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 69.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -1.25 \cdot 10^{+225} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq 1.25 \cdot 10^{+221}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 14: 62.9% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -1.9 \cdot 10^{+240} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq 1.3 \cdot 10^{+221}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + c \cdot i\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* x y) -1.9e+240) (not (<= (* x y) 1.3e+221)))
   (* x y)
   (+ (* a b) (* c i))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x * y) <= -1.9e+240) || !((x * y) <= 1.3e+221)) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((x * y) <= (-1.9d+240)) .or. (.not. ((x * y) <= 1.3d+221))) then
        tmp = x * y
    else
        tmp = (a * b) + (c * i)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x * y) <= -1.9e+240) || !((x * y) <= 1.3e+221)) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if ((x * y) <= -1.9e+240) or not ((x * y) <= 1.3e+221):
		tmp = x * y
	else:
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(x * y) <= -1.9e+240) || !(Float64(x * y) <= 1.3e+221))
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(c * i));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((x * y) <= -1.9e+240) || ~(((x * y) <= 1.3e+221)))
		tmp = x * y;
	else
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -1.9e+240], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 1.3e+221]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -1.9000000000000002e240 or 1.30000000000000002e221 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 89.2%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 89.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 90.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right) \]

   3. Simplified 90.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 86.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around inf 83.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]

   if -1.9000000000000002e240 < (*.f64 x y) < 1.30000000000000002e221

   1. Initial program 97.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 97.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 99.5%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 99.5%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 88.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in c around inf 58.2%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{c \cdot i} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 64.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -1.9 \cdot 10^{+240} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq 1.3 \cdot 10^{+221}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + c \cdot i\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 15: 64.8% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -6.4 \cdot 10^{+219}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 6.4 \cdot 10^{+88}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + a \cdot b\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* x y) -6.4e+219)
   (* x y)
   (if (<= (* x y) 6.4e+88) (+ (* a b) (* z t)) (+ (* x y) (* a b)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -6.4e+219) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else if ((x * y) <= 6.4e+88) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	} else {
		tmp = (x * y) + (a * b);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x * y) <= (-6.4d+219)) then
        tmp = x * y
    else if ((x * y) <= 6.4d+88) then
        tmp = (a * b) + (z * t)
    else
        tmp = (x * y) + (a * b)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -6.4e+219) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else if ((x * y) <= 6.4e+88) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	} else {
		tmp = (x * y) + (a * b);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if (x * y) <= -6.4e+219:
		tmp = x * y
	elif (x * y) <= 6.4e+88:
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t)
	else:
		tmp = (x * y) + (a * b)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(x * y) <= -6.4e+219)
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= 6.4e+88)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(z * t));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(a * b));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x * y) <= -6.4e+219)
		tmp = x * y;
	elseif ((x * y) <= 6.4e+88)
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	else
		tmp = (x * y) + (a * b);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -6.4e+219], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 6.4e+88], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -6.40000000000000053e219

   1. Initial program 82.4%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 82.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 85.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right) \]

   3. Simplified 85.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 82.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around inf 76.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]

   if -6.40000000000000053e219 < (*.f64 x y) < 6.3999999999999997e88

   1. Initial program 97.7%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 97.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 90.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in c around 0 66.1%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]

   if 6.3999999999999997e88 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 97.7%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 97.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 97.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right) \]

   3. Simplified 97.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 91.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in c around 0 81.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + x \cdot y} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 70.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -6.4 \cdot 10^{+219}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 6.4 \cdot 10^{+88}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + a \cdot b\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 16: 42.8% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \cdot b \leq -3.25 \cdot 10^{+53} \lor \neg \left(a \cdot b \leq 7.6 \cdot 10^{+143}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* a b) -3.25e+53) (not (<= (* a b) 7.6e+143))) (* a b) (* c i)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((a * b) <= -3.25e+53) || !((a * b) <= 7.6e+143)) {
		tmp = a * b;
	} else {
		tmp = c * i;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((a * b) <= (-3.25d+53)) .or. (.not. ((a * b) <= 7.6d+143))) then
        tmp = a * b
    else
        tmp = c * i
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((a * b) <= -3.25e+53) || !((a * b) <= 7.6e+143)) {
		tmp = a * b;
	} else {
		tmp = c * i;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if ((a * b) <= -3.25e+53) or not ((a * b) <= 7.6e+143):
		tmp = a * b
	else:
		tmp = c * i
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(a * b) <= -3.25e+53) || !(Float64(a * b) <= 7.6e+143))
		tmp = Float64(a * b);
	else
		tmp = Float64(c * i);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((a * b) <= -3.25e+53) || ~(((a * b) <= 7.6e+143)))
		tmp = a * b;
	else
		tmp = c * i;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], -3.25e+53], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], 7.6e+143]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 a b) < -3.25000000000000008e53 or 7.60000000000000001e143 < (*.f64 a b)

   1. Initial program 92.6%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 92.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 95.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 95.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 97.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 97.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 97.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around inf 61.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b} \]

   if -3.25000000000000008e53 < (*.f64 a b) < 7.60000000000000001e143

   1. Initial program 97.5%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 97.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 97.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 97.5%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 97.5%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 98.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 98.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in c around inf 32.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 43.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \cdot b \leq -3.25 \cdot 10^{+53} \lor \neg \left(a \cdot b \leq 7.6 \cdot 10^{+143}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 17: 26.9% accurate, 5.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ a \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i) :precision binary64 (* a b))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return a * b;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = a * b
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return a * b;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return a * b

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(a * b)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = a * b;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 95.7%

   \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 95.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

   2. fma-define 96.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. +-commutative 96.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

   4. fma-define 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

   5. fma-define 98.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

3. Simplified 98.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in a around inf 26.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024130 
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
  :name "Linear.V4:$cdot from linear-1.19.1.3, C"
  :precision binary64
  (+ (+ (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* a b)) (* c i)))