Data.Histogram.Bin.BinF:$cfromIndex from histogram-fill-0.8.4.1

Percentage Accurate: 100.0% → 100.0%

Time: 4.4s

Alternatives: 7

Speedup: 1.3×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right) + z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (+ (/ x 2.0) (* y x)) z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x / 2.0) + (y * x)) + z;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = ((x / 2.0d0) + (y * x)) + z
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x / 2.0) + (y * x)) + z;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return ((x / 2.0) + (y * x)) + z

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x / 2.0) + Float64(y * x)) + z)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = ((x / 2.0) + (y * x)) + z;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(x / 2.0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right) + z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (+ (/ x 2.0) (* y x)) z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x / 2.0) + (y * x)) + z;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = ((x / 2.0d0) + (y * x)) + z
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x / 2.0) + (y * x)) + z;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return ((x / 2.0) + (y * x)) + z

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x / 2.0) + Float64(y * x)) + z)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = ((x / 2.0) + (y * x)) + z;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(x / 2.0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 1.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ z + x \cdot \left(y - -0.5\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ z (* x (- y -0.5))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z + (x * (y - -0.5));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = z + (x * (y - (-0.5d0)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z + (x * (y - -0.5));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return z + (x * (y - -0.5))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(z + Float64(x * Float64(y - -0.5)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = z + (x * (y - -0.5));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(z + N[(x * N[(y - -0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[\left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right) + z \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right)} \]

   2. remove-double-neg 100.0%

      \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right)\right)\right)} \]

   3. distribute-neg-in 100.0%

      \[\leadsto z + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(\left(-\frac{x}{2}\right) + \left(-y \cdot x\right)\right)}\right) \]

   4. distribute-frac-neg 100.0%

      \[\leadsto z + \left(-\left(\color{blue}{\frac{-x}{2}} + \left(-y \cdot x\right)\right)\right) \]

   5. distribute-rgt-neg-out 100.0%

      \[\leadsto z + \left(-\left(\frac{-x}{2} + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-x\right)}\right)\right) \]

   6. unsub-neg 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z - \left(\frac{-x}{2} + y \cdot \left(-x\right)\right)} \]

   7. +-commutative 100.0%

      \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(-x\right) + \frac{-x}{2}\right)} \]

   8. +-commutative 100.0%

      \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{\left(\frac{-x}{2} + y \cdot \left(-x\right)\right)} \]

   9. *-commutative 100.0%

      \[\leadsto z - \left(\frac{-x}{2} + \color{blue}{\left(-x\right) \cdot y}\right) \]

   10. cancel-sign-sub-inv 100.0%

       \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{\left(\frac{-x}{2} - x \cdot y\right)} \]

   11. neg-mul-1 100.0%

       \[\leadsto z - \left(\frac{\color{blue}{-1 \cdot x}}{2} - x \cdot y\right) \]

   12. *-commutative 100.0%

       \[\leadsto z - \left(\frac{\color{blue}{x \cdot -1}}{2} - x \cdot y\right) \]

   13. associate-/l* 100.0%

       \[\leadsto z - \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{-1}{2}} - x \cdot y\right) \]

   14. distribute-lft-out-- 100.0%

       \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\frac{-1}{2} - y\right)} \]

   15. metadata-eval 100.0%

       \[\leadsto z - x \cdot \left(\color{blue}{-0.5} - y\right) \]

3. Simplified 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z - x \cdot \left(-0.5 - y\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto z + x \cdot \left(y - -0.5\right) \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 59.7% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.8 \cdot 10^{+14}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq -9 \cdot 10^{-158}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1.8 \cdot 10^{-171}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 0.5\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 5.9 \cdot 10^{+40}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -1.8e+14)
   (* x y)
   (if (<= y -9e-158)
     z
     (if (<= y 1.8e-171) (* x 0.5) (if (<= y 5.9e+40) z (* x y))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -1.8e+14) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else if (y <= -9e-158) {
		tmp = z;
	} else if (y <= 1.8e-171) {
		tmp = x * 0.5;
	} else if (y <= 5.9e+40) {
		tmp = z;
	} else {
		tmp = x * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= (-1.8d+14)) then
        tmp = x * y
    else if (y <= (-9d-158)) then
        tmp = z
    else if (y <= 1.8d-171) then
        tmp = x * 0.5d0
    else if (y <= 5.9d+40) then
        tmp = z
    else
        tmp = x * y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -1.8e+14) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else if (y <= -9e-158) {
		tmp = z;
	} else if (y <= 1.8e-171) {
		tmp = x * 0.5;
	} else if (y <= 5.9e+40) {
		tmp = z;
	} else {
		tmp = x * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -1.8e+14:
		tmp = x * y
	elif y <= -9e-158:
		tmp = z
	elif y <= 1.8e-171:
		tmp = x * 0.5
	elif y <= 5.9e+40:
		tmp = z
	else:
		tmp = x * y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -1.8e+14)
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	elseif (y <= -9e-158)
		tmp = z;
	elseif (y <= 1.8e-171)
		tmp = Float64(x * 0.5);
	elseif (y <= 5.9e+40)
		tmp = z;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -1.8e+14)
		tmp = x * y;
	elseif (y <= -9e-158)
		tmp = z;
	elseif (y <= 1.8e-171)
		tmp = x * 0.5;
	elseif (y <= 5.9e+40)
		tmp = z;
	else
		tmp = x * y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, -1.8e+14], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, -9e-158], z, If[LessEqual[y, 1.8e-171], N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, 5.9e+40], z, N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if y < -1.8e14 or 5.8999999999999999e40 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right) + z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{2} + \left(y \cdot x + z\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{2} + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot y} + z\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{2} + \left(x \cdot y + z\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 75.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]

   if -1.8e14 < y < -9e-158 or 1.80000000000000002e-171 < y < 5.8999999999999999e40

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right) + z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{2} + \left(y \cdot x + z\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{2} + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot y} + z\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{2} + \left(x \cdot y + z\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 65.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]

   if -9e-158 < y < 1.80000000000000002e-171

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right) + z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{2} + \left(y \cdot x + z\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{2} + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot y} + z\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{2} + \left(x \cdot y + z\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 56.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(0.5 + y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around 0 56.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot x} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 56.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot 0.5} \]

   8. Simplified 56.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot 0.5} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 68.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.8 \cdot 10^{+14}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq -9 \cdot 10^{-158}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1.8 \cdot 10^{-171}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 0.5\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 5.9 \cdot 10^{+40}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 75.3% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -3.8 \cdot 10^{-97} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1.02 \cdot 10^{-77}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(y + 0.5\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -3.8e-97) (not (<= x 1.02e-77))) (* x (+ y 0.5)) z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -3.8e-97) || !(x <= 1.02e-77)) {
		tmp = x * (y + 0.5);
	} else {
		tmp = z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-3.8d-97)) .or. (.not. (x <= 1.02d-77))) then
        tmp = x * (y + 0.5d0)
    else
        tmp = z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -3.8e-97) || !(x <= 1.02e-77)) {
		tmp = x * (y + 0.5);
	} else {
		tmp = z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -3.8e-97) or not (x <= 1.02e-77):
		tmp = x * (y + 0.5)
	else:
		tmp = z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -3.8e-97) || !(x <= 1.02e-77))
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(y + 0.5));
	else
		tmp = z;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -3.8e-97) || ~((x <= 1.02e-77)))
		tmp = x * (y + 0.5);
	else
		tmp = z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -3.8e-97], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 1.02e-77]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[(y + 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], z]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -3.8000000000000001e-97 or 1.02e-77 < x

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right) + z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{2} + \left(y \cdot x + z\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{2} + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot y} + z\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{2} + \left(x \cdot y + z\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 83.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(0.5 + y\right)} \]

   if -3.8000000000000001e-97 < x < 1.02e-77

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right) + z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{2} + \left(y \cdot x + z\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{2} + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot y} + z\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{2} + \left(x \cdot y + z\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 73.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 79.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -3.8 \cdot 10^{-97} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1.02 \cdot 10^{-77}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(y + 0.5\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 86.2% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -36000000000 \lor \neg \left(x \leq 52\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(y + 0.5\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z + x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -36000000000.0) (not (<= x 52.0)))
   (* x (+ y 0.5))
   (+ z (* x y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -36000000000.0) || !(x <= 52.0)) {
		tmp = x * (y + 0.5);
	} else {
		tmp = z + (x * y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-36000000000.0d0)) .or. (.not. (x <= 52.0d0))) then
        tmp = x * (y + 0.5d0)
    else
        tmp = z + (x * y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -36000000000.0) || !(x <= 52.0)) {
		tmp = x * (y + 0.5);
	} else {
		tmp = z + (x * y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -36000000000.0) or not (x <= 52.0):
		tmp = x * (y + 0.5)
	else:
		tmp = z + (x * y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -36000000000.0) || !(x <= 52.0))
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(y + 0.5));
	else
		tmp = Float64(z + Float64(x * y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -36000000000.0) || ~((x <= 52.0)))
		tmp = x * (y + 0.5);
	else
		tmp = z + (x * y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -36000000000.0], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 52.0]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[(y + 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(z + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -3.6e10 or 52 < x

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right) + z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{2} + \left(y \cdot x + z\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{2} + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot y} + z\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{2} + \left(x \cdot y + z\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 91.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(0.5 + y\right)} \]

   if -3.6e10 < x < 52

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right) + z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right)} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right)\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-neg-in 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(\left(-\frac{x}{2}\right) + \left(-y \cdot x\right)\right)}\right) \]

      4. distribute-frac-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z + \left(-\left(\color{blue}{\frac{-x}{2}} + \left(-y \cdot x\right)\right)\right) \]

      5. distribute-rgt-neg-out 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z + \left(-\left(\frac{-x}{2} + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-x\right)}\right)\right) \]

      6. unsub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z - \left(\frac{-x}{2} + y \cdot \left(-x\right)\right)} \]

      7. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(-x\right) + \frac{-x}{2}\right)} \]

      8. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{\left(\frac{-x}{2} + y \cdot \left(-x\right)\right)} \]

      9. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z - \left(\frac{-x}{2} + \color{blue}{\left(-x\right) \cdot y}\right) \]

      10. cancel-sign-sub-inv 100.0%

          \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{\left(\frac{-x}{2} - x \cdot y\right)} \]

      11. neg-mul-1 100.0%

          \[\leadsto z - \left(\frac{\color{blue}{-1 \cdot x}}{2} - x \cdot y\right) \]

      12. *-commutative 100.0%

          \[\leadsto z - \left(\frac{\color{blue}{x \cdot -1}}{2} - x \cdot y\right) \]

      13. associate-/l* 100.0%

          \[\leadsto z - \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{-1}{2}} - x \cdot y\right) \]

      14. distribute-lft-out-- 100.0%

          \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\frac{-1}{2} - y\right)} \]

      15. metadata-eval 100.0%

          \[\leadsto z - x \cdot \left(\color{blue}{-0.5} - y\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z - x \cdot \left(-0.5 - y\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 88.7%

      \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 88.7%

         \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{\left(-x \cdot y\right)} \]

      2. distribute-rgt-neg-out 88.7%

         \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(-y\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 88.7%

      \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(-y\right)} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 88.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \left(-x \cdot \left(-y\right)\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative 88.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-x \cdot \left(-y\right)\right) + z} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-neg-out 88.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-x \cdot y\right)}\right) + z \]

      4. remove-double-neg 88.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} + z \]

   9. Applied egg-rr 88.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y + z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 89.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -36000000000 \lor \neg \left(x \leq 52\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(y + 0.5\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z + x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 98.4% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -160 \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1.8 \cdot 10^{-20}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z + x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z - x \cdot -0.5\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -160.0) (not (<= y 1.8e-20))) (+ z (* x y)) (- z (* x -0.5))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -160.0) || !(y <= 1.8e-20)) {
		tmp = z + (x * y);
	} else {
		tmp = z - (x * -0.5);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-160.0d0)) .or. (.not. (y <= 1.8d-20))) then
        tmp = z + (x * y)
    else
        tmp = z - (x * (-0.5d0))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -160.0) || !(y <= 1.8e-20)) {
		tmp = z + (x * y);
	} else {
		tmp = z - (x * -0.5);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -160.0) or not (y <= 1.8e-20):
		tmp = z + (x * y)
	else:
		tmp = z - (x * -0.5)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -160.0) || !(y <= 1.8e-20))
		tmp = Float64(z + Float64(x * y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(z - Float64(x * -0.5));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -160.0) || ~((y <= 1.8e-20)))
		tmp = z + (x * y);
	else
		tmp = z - (x * -0.5);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -160.0], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 1.8e-20]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(z + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(z - N[(x * -0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -160 or 1.79999999999999987e-20 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right) + z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right)} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right)\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-neg-in 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(\left(-\frac{x}{2}\right) + \left(-y \cdot x\right)\right)}\right) \]

      4. distribute-frac-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z + \left(-\left(\color{blue}{\frac{-x}{2}} + \left(-y \cdot x\right)\right)\right) \]

      5. distribute-rgt-neg-out 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z + \left(-\left(\frac{-x}{2} + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-x\right)}\right)\right) \]

      6. unsub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z - \left(\frac{-x}{2} + y \cdot \left(-x\right)\right)} \]

      7. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(-x\right) + \frac{-x}{2}\right)} \]

      8. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{\left(\frac{-x}{2} + y \cdot \left(-x\right)\right)} \]

      9. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z - \left(\frac{-x}{2} + \color{blue}{\left(-x\right) \cdot y}\right) \]

      10. cancel-sign-sub-inv 100.0%

          \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{\left(\frac{-x}{2} - x \cdot y\right)} \]

      11. neg-mul-1 100.0%

          \[\leadsto z - \left(\frac{\color{blue}{-1 \cdot x}}{2} - x \cdot y\right) \]

      12. *-commutative 100.0%

          \[\leadsto z - \left(\frac{\color{blue}{x \cdot -1}}{2} - x \cdot y\right) \]

      13. associate-/l* 100.0%

          \[\leadsto z - \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{-1}{2}} - x \cdot y\right) \]

      14. distribute-lft-out-- 100.0%

          \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\frac{-1}{2} - y\right)} \]

      15. metadata-eval 100.0%

          \[\leadsto z - x \cdot \left(\color{blue}{-0.5} - y\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z - x \cdot \left(-0.5 - y\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 99.2%

      \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 99.2%

         \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{\left(-x \cdot y\right)} \]

      2. distribute-rgt-neg-out 99.2%

         \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(-y\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 99.2%

      \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(-y\right)} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 99.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \left(-x \cdot \left(-y\right)\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative 99.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-x \cdot \left(-y\right)\right) + z} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-neg-out 99.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-x \cdot y\right)}\right) + z \]

      4. remove-double-neg 99.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} + z \]

   9. Applied egg-rr 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y + z} \]

   if -160 < y < 1.79999999999999987e-20

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right) + z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right)} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right)\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-neg-in 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(\left(-\frac{x}{2}\right) + \left(-y \cdot x\right)\right)}\right) \]

      4. distribute-frac-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z + \left(-\left(\color{blue}{\frac{-x}{2}} + \left(-y \cdot x\right)\right)\right) \]

      5. distribute-rgt-neg-out 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z + \left(-\left(\frac{-x}{2} + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-x\right)}\right)\right) \]

      6. unsub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z - \left(\frac{-x}{2} + y \cdot \left(-x\right)\right)} \]

      7. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(-x\right) + \frac{-x}{2}\right)} \]

      8. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{\left(\frac{-x}{2} + y \cdot \left(-x\right)\right)} \]

      9. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z - \left(\frac{-x}{2} + \color{blue}{\left(-x\right) \cdot y}\right) \]

      10. cancel-sign-sub-inv 100.0%

          \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{\left(\frac{-x}{2} - x \cdot y\right)} \]

      11. neg-mul-1 100.0%

          \[\leadsto z - \left(\frac{\color{blue}{-1 \cdot x}}{2} - x \cdot y\right) \]

      12. *-commutative 100.0%

          \[\leadsto z - \left(\frac{\color{blue}{x \cdot -1}}{2} - x \cdot y\right) \]

      13. associate-/l* 100.0%

          \[\leadsto z - \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{-1}{2}} - x \cdot y\right) \]

      14. distribute-lft-out-- 100.0%

          \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\frac{-1}{2} - y\right)} \]

      15. metadata-eval 100.0%

          \[\leadsto z - x \cdot \left(\color{blue}{-0.5} - y\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z - x \cdot \left(-0.5 - y\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.3%

      \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{-0.5 \cdot x} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.3%

         \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{x \cdot -0.5} \]

   7. Simplified 99.3%

      \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{x \cdot -0.5} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -160 \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1.8 \cdot 10^{-20}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z + x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z - x \cdot -0.5\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 51.3% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -68000000000 \lor \neg \left(x \leq 9.5 \cdot 10^{+71}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 0.5\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -68000000000.0) (not (<= x 9.5e+71))) (* x 0.5) z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -68000000000.0) || !(x <= 9.5e+71)) {
		tmp = x * 0.5;
	} else {
		tmp = z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-68000000000.0d0)) .or. (.not. (x <= 9.5d+71))) then
        tmp = x * 0.5d0
    else
        tmp = z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -68000000000.0) || !(x <= 9.5e+71)) {
		tmp = x * 0.5;
	} else {
		tmp = z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -68000000000.0) or not (x <= 9.5e+71):
		tmp = x * 0.5
	else:
		tmp = z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -68000000000.0) || !(x <= 9.5e+71))
		tmp = Float64(x * 0.5);
	else
		tmp = z;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -68000000000.0) || ~((x <= 9.5e+71)))
		tmp = x * 0.5;
	else
		tmp = z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -68000000000.0], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 9.5e+71]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision], z]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -6.8e10 or 9.50000000000000015e71 < x

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right) + z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{2} + \left(y \cdot x + z\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{2} + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot y} + z\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{2} + \left(x \cdot y + z\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 92.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(0.5 + y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around 0 39.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot x} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 39.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot 0.5} \]

   8. Simplified 39.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot 0.5} \]

   if -6.8e10 < x < 9.50000000000000015e71

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right) + z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{2} + \left(y \cdot x + z\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{2} + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot y} + z\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{2} + \left(x \cdot y + z\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 59.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 52.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -68000000000 \lor \neg \left(x \leq 9.5 \cdot 10^{+71}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 0.5\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 40.7% accurate, 9.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 z)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = z
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return z

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return z
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = z;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := z

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[\left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right) + z \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-+l+ 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{2} + \left(y \cdot x + z\right)} \]

   2. *-commutative 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{x}{2} + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot y} + z\right) \]

3. Simplified 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{2} + \left(x \cdot y + z\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 42.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]

6. Final simplification 42.2%

   \[\leadsto z \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024130 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Data.Histogram.Bin.BinF:$cfromIndex from histogram-fill-0.8.4.1"
  :precision binary64
  (+ (+ (/ x 2.0) (* y x)) z))