Graphics.Rendering.Plot.Render.Plot.Legend:renderLegendInside from plot-0.2.3.4

Percentage Accurate: 99.9% → 100.0%
Time: 7.9s
Alternatives: 9
Speedup: 1.2×

Specification

?
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (+ (+ (+ (+ x y) y) x) z) x))
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((((x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x;
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = ((((x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((((x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x;
}
def code(x, y, z):
	return ((((x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x
function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x)
end
function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = ((((x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x;
end
code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] + y), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x
\end{array}

Sampling outcomes in binary64 precision:

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 9 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (+ (+ (+ (+ x y) y) x) z) x))
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((((x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x;
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = ((((x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((((x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x;
}
def code(x, y, z):
	return ((((x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x
function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x)
end
function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = ((((x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x;
end
code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] + y), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 0.1× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, y \cdot 2\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ z (fma x 3.0 (* y 2.0))))
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z + fma(x, 3.0, (y * 2.0));
}
function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(z + fma(x, 3.0, Float64(y * 2.0)))
end
code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(z + N[(x * 3.0 + N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, y \cdot 2\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.9%

    \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. +-commutative99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right)\right)} + x \]
    2. associate-+l+99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + x\right)} \]
    3. +-commutative99.9%

      \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right)\right)} \]
    4. +-commutative99.9%

      \[\leadsto z + \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right)\right)}\right) \]
    5. associate-+l+99.9%

      \[\leadsto z + \left(x + \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(y + y\right)\right)}\right)\right) \]
    6. associate-+r+99.9%

      \[\leadsto z + \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + x\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right)}\right) \]
    7. associate-+r+100.0%

      \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + \left(x + x\right)\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right)} \]
    8. *-lft-identity100.0%

      \[\leadsto z + \left(\left(\color{blue}{1 \cdot x} + \left(x + x\right)\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]
    9. metadata-eval100.0%

      \[\leadsto z + \left(\left(\color{blue}{\left(--1\right)} \cdot x + \left(x + x\right)\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]
    10. count-2100.0%

      \[\leadsto z + \left(\left(\left(--1\right) \cdot x + \color{blue}{2 \cdot x}\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]
    11. distribute-rgt-out100.0%

      \[\leadsto z + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\left(--1\right) + 2\right)} + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]
    12. fma-define99.9%

      \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \left(--1\right) + 2, y + y\right)} \]
    13. metadata-eval99.9%

      \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{1} + 2, y + y\right) \]
    14. metadata-eval99.9%

      \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{3}, y + y\right) \]
    15. count-299.9%

      \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, \color{blue}{2 \cdot y}\right) \]
    16. *-commutative99.9%

      \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, \color{blue}{y \cdot 2}\right) \]
  3. Simplified99.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, y \cdot 2\right)} \]
  4. Add Preprocessing
  5. Final simplification99.9%

    \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, y \cdot 2\right) \]
  6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 53.1% accurate, 0.3× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -15500000000:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 3\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -6.5 \cdot 10^{-154}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -1 \cdot 10^{-286}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 6.8 \cdot 10^{-261}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 2.3 \cdot 10^{-217}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 1.15 \cdot 10^{-60}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 3.5 \cdot 10^{+41}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 3\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -15500000000.0)
   (* x 3.0)
   (if (<= x -6.5e-154)
     z
     (if (<= x -1e-286)
       (* y 2.0)
       (if (<= x 6.8e-261)
         z
         (if (<= x 2.3e-217)
           (* y 2.0)
           (if (<= x 1.15e-60) z (if (<= x 3.5e+41) (* y 2.0) (* x 3.0)))))))))
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -15500000000.0) {
		tmp = x * 3.0;
	} else if (x <= -6.5e-154) {
		tmp = z;
	} else if (x <= -1e-286) {
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	} else if (x <= 6.8e-261) {
		tmp = z;
	} else if (x <= 2.3e-217) {
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	} else if (x <= 1.15e-60) {
		tmp = z;
	} else if (x <= 3.5e+41) {
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = x * 3.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-15500000000.0d0)) then
        tmp = x * 3.0d0
    else if (x <= (-6.5d-154)) then
        tmp = z
    else if (x <= (-1d-286)) then
        tmp = y * 2.0d0
    else if (x <= 6.8d-261) then
        tmp = z
    else if (x <= 2.3d-217) then
        tmp = y * 2.0d0
    else if (x <= 1.15d-60) then
        tmp = z
    else if (x <= 3.5d+41) then
        tmp = y * 2.0d0
    else
        tmp = x * 3.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -15500000000.0) {
		tmp = x * 3.0;
	} else if (x <= -6.5e-154) {
		tmp = z;
	} else if (x <= -1e-286) {
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	} else if (x <= 6.8e-261) {
		tmp = z;
	} else if (x <= 2.3e-217) {
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	} else if (x <= 1.15e-60) {
		tmp = z;
	} else if (x <= 3.5e+41) {
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = x * 3.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -15500000000.0:
		tmp = x * 3.0
	elif x <= -6.5e-154:
		tmp = z
	elif x <= -1e-286:
		tmp = y * 2.0
	elif x <= 6.8e-261:
		tmp = z
	elif x <= 2.3e-217:
		tmp = y * 2.0
	elif x <= 1.15e-60:
		tmp = z
	elif x <= 3.5e+41:
		tmp = y * 2.0
	else:
		tmp = x * 3.0
	return tmp
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -15500000000.0)
		tmp = Float64(x * 3.0);
	elseif (x <= -6.5e-154)
		tmp = z;
	elseif (x <= -1e-286)
		tmp = Float64(y * 2.0);
	elseif (x <= 6.8e-261)
		tmp = z;
	elseif (x <= 2.3e-217)
		tmp = Float64(y * 2.0);
	elseif (x <= 1.15e-60)
		tmp = z;
	elseif (x <= 3.5e+41)
		tmp = Float64(y * 2.0);
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * 3.0);
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -15500000000.0)
		tmp = x * 3.0;
	elseif (x <= -6.5e-154)
		tmp = z;
	elseif (x <= -1e-286)
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	elseif (x <= 6.8e-261)
		tmp = z;
	elseif (x <= 2.3e-217)
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	elseif (x <= 1.15e-60)
		tmp = z;
	elseif (x <= 3.5e+41)
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	else
		tmp = x * 3.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[x, -15500000000.0], N[(x * 3.0), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[x, -6.5e-154], z, If[LessEqual[x, -1e-286], N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[x, 6.8e-261], z, If[LessEqual[x, 2.3e-217], N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[x, 1.15e-60], z, If[LessEqual[x, 3.5e+41], N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * 3.0), $MachinePrecision]]]]]]]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;x \leq -15500000000:\\
\;\;\;\;x \cdot 3\\

\mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -6.5 \cdot 10^{-154}:\\
\;\;\;\;z\\

\mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -1 \cdot 10^{-286}:\\
\;\;\;\;y \cdot 2\\

\mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 6.8 \cdot 10^{-261}:\\
\;\;\;\;z\\

\mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 2.3 \cdot 10^{-217}:\\
\;\;\;\;y \cdot 2\\

\mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 1.15 \cdot 10^{-60}:\\
\;\;\;\;z\\

\mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 3.5 \cdot 10^{+41}:\\
\;\;\;\;y \cdot 2\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;x \cdot 3\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 3 regimes
  2. if x < -1.55e10 or 3.4999999999999999e41 < x

    1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative99.9%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right)\right)} + x \]
      2. associate-+l+99.9%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + x\right)} \]
      3. +-commutative99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right)\right)} \]
      4. +-commutative99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right)\right)}\right) \]
      5. associate-+l+99.8%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(x + \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(y + y\right)\right)}\right)\right) \]
      6. associate-+r+99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + x\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right)}\right) \]
      7. associate-+r+99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + \left(x + x\right)\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right)} \]
      8. *-lft-identity99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(\left(\color{blue}{1 \cdot x} + \left(x + x\right)\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]
      9. metadata-eval99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(\left(\color{blue}{\left(--1\right)} \cdot x + \left(x + x\right)\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]
      10. count-299.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(\left(\left(--1\right) \cdot x + \color{blue}{2 \cdot x}\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]
      11. distribute-rgt-out99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\left(--1\right) + 2\right)} + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]
      12. fma-define99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \left(--1\right) + 2, y + y\right)} \]
      13. metadata-eval99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{1} + 2, y + y\right) \]
      14. metadata-eval99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{3}, y + y\right) \]
      15. count-299.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, \color{blue}{2 \cdot y}\right) \]
      16. *-commutative99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, \color{blue}{y \cdot 2}\right) \]
    3. Simplified99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, y \cdot 2\right)} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 65.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{3 \cdot x} \]

    if -1.55e10 < x < -6.5000000000000003e-154 or -1.00000000000000005e-286 < x < 6.8e-261 or 2.30000000000000005e-217 < x < 1.1500000000000001e-60

    1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative99.9%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right)\right)} + x \]
      2. associate-+l+99.9%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + x\right)} \]
      3. +-commutative99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right)\right)} \]
      4. +-commutative99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right)\right)}\right) \]
      5. associate-+l+99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(x + \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(y + y\right)\right)}\right)\right) \]
      6. associate-+r+100.0%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + x\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right)}\right) \]
      7. associate-+r+100.0%

        \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + \left(x + x\right)\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right)} \]
      8. *-lft-identity100.0%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(\left(\color{blue}{1 \cdot x} + \left(x + x\right)\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]
      9. metadata-eval100.0%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(\left(\color{blue}{\left(--1\right)} \cdot x + \left(x + x\right)\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]
      10. count-2100.0%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(\left(\left(--1\right) \cdot x + \color{blue}{2 \cdot x}\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]
      11. distribute-rgt-out100.0%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\left(--1\right) + 2\right)} + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]
      12. fma-define100.0%

        \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \left(--1\right) + 2, y + y\right)} \]
      13. metadata-eval100.0%

        \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{1} + 2, y + y\right) \]
      14. metadata-eval100.0%

        \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{3}, y + y\right) \]
      15. count-2100.0%

        \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, \color{blue}{2 \cdot y}\right) \]
      16. *-commutative100.0%

        \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, \color{blue}{y \cdot 2}\right) \]
    3. Simplified100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, y \cdot 2\right)} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 59.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]

    if -6.5000000000000003e-154 < x < -1.00000000000000005e-286 or 6.8e-261 < x < 2.30000000000000005e-217 or 1.1500000000000001e-60 < x < 3.4999999999999999e41

    1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative100.0%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right)\right)} + x \]
      2. associate-+l+100.0%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + x\right)} \]
      3. +-commutative100.0%

        \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right)\right)} \]
      4. +-commutative100.0%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right)\right)}\right) \]
      5. associate-+l+100.0%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(x + \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(y + y\right)\right)}\right)\right) \]
      6. associate-+r+100.0%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + x\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right)}\right) \]
      7. associate-+r+100.0%

        \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + \left(x + x\right)\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right)} \]
      8. *-lft-identity100.0%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(\left(\color{blue}{1 \cdot x} + \left(x + x\right)\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]
      9. metadata-eval100.0%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(\left(\color{blue}{\left(--1\right)} \cdot x + \left(x + x\right)\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]
      10. count-2100.0%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(\left(\left(--1\right) \cdot x + \color{blue}{2 \cdot x}\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]
      11. distribute-rgt-out100.0%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\left(--1\right) + 2\right)} + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]
      12. fma-define100.0%

        \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \left(--1\right) + 2, y + y\right)} \]
      13. metadata-eval100.0%

        \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{1} + 2, y + y\right) \]
      14. metadata-eval100.0%

        \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{3}, y + y\right) \]
      15. count-2100.0%

        \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, \color{blue}{2 \cdot y}\right) \]
      16. *-commutative100.0%

        \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, \color{blue}{y \cdot 2}\right) \]
    3. Simplified100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, y \cdot 2\right)} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 68.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot y} \]
  3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification64.2%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -15500000000:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 3\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -6.5 \cdot 10^{-154}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -1 \cdot 10^{-286}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 6.8 \cdot 10^{-261}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 2.3 \cdot 10^{-217}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 1.15 \cdot 10^{-60}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 3.5 \cdot 10^{+41}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 3\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 53.4% accurate, 0.3× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.65 \cdot 10^{+27}:\\ \;\;\;\;z + x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq -2.8 \cdot 10^{-181}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 3.5 \cdot 10^{-179}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 3\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 2.1 \cdot 10^{-78}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 6.5 \cdot 10^{-25}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 3\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 6.5 \cdot 10^{+109}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z + x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -1.65e+27)
   (+ z x)
   (if (<= z -2.8e-181)
     (* y 2.0)
     (if (<= z 3.5e-179)
       (* x 3.0)
       (if (<= z 2.1e-78)
         (* y 2.0)
         (if (<= z 6.5e-25)
           (* x 3.0)
           (if (<= z 6.5e+109) (* y 2.0) (+ z x))))))))
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -1.65e+27) {
		tmp = z + x;
	} else if (z <= -2.8e-181) {
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	} else if (z <= 3.5e-179) {
		tmp = x * 3.0;
	} else if (z <= 2.1e-78) {
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	} else if (z <= 6.5e-25) {
		tmp = x * 3.0;
	} else if (z <= 6.5e+109) {
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = z + x;
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-1.65d+27)) then
        tmp = z + x
    else if (z <= (-2.8d-181)) then
        tmp = y * 2.0d0
    else if (z <= 3.5d-179) then
        tmp = x * 3.0d0
    else if (z <= 2.1d-78) then
        tmp = y * 2.0d0
    else if (z <= 6.5d-25) then
        tmp = x * 3.0d0
    else if (z <= 6.5d+109) then
        tmp = y * 2.0d0
    else
        tmp = z + x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -1.65e+27) {
		tmp = z + x;
	} else if (z <= -2.8e-181) {
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	} else if (z <= 3.5e-179) {
		tmp = x * 3.0;
	} else if (z <= 2.1e-78) {
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	} else if (z <= 6.5e-25) {
		tmp = x * 3.0;
	} else if (z <= 6.5e+109) {
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = z + x;
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -1.65e+27:
		tmp = z + x
	elif z <= -2.8e-181:
		tmp = y * 2.0
	elif z <= 3.5e-179:
		tmp = x * 3.0
	elif z <= 2.1e-78:
		tmp = y * 2.0
	elif z <= 6.5e-25:
		tmp = x * 3.0
	elif z <= 6.5e+109:
		tmp = y * 2.0
	else:
		tmp = z + x
	return tmp
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -1.65e+27)
		tmp = Float64(z + x);
	elseif (z <= -2.8e-181)
		tmp = Float64(y * 2.0);
	elseif (z <= 3.5e-179)
		tmp = Float64(x * 3.0);
	elseif (z <= 2.1e-78)
		tmp = Float64(y * 2.0);
	elseif (z <= 6.5e-25)
		tmp = Float64(x * 3.0);
	elseif (z <= 6.5e+109)
		tmp = Float64(y * 2.0);
	else
		tmp = Float64(z + x);
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -1.65e+27)
		tmp = z + x;
	elseif (z <= -2.8e-181)
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	elseif (z <= 3.5e-179)
		tmp = x * 3.0;
	elseif (z <= 2.1e-78)
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	elseif (z <= 6.5e-25)
		tmp = x * 3.0;
	elseif (z <= 6.5e+109)
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	else
		tmp = z + x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[z, -1.65e+27], N[(z + x), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, -2.8e-181], N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 3.5e-179], N[(x * 3.0), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 2.1e-78], N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 6.5e-25], N[(x * 3.0), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 6.5e+109], N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision], N[(z + x), $MachinePrecision]]]]]]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.65 \cdot 10^{+27}:\\
\;\;\;\;z + x\\

\mathbf{elif}\;z \leq -2.8 \cdot 10^{-181}:\\
\;\;\;\;y \cdot 2\\

\mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 3.5 \cdot 10^{-179}:\\
\;\;\;\;x \cdot 3\\

\mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 2.1 \cdot 10^{-78}:\\
\;\;\;\;y \cdot 2\\

\mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 6.5 \cdot 10^{-25}:\\
\;\;\;\;x \cdot 3\\

\mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 6.5 \cdot 10^{+109}:\\
\;\;\;\;y \cdot 2\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;z + x\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 3 regimes
  2. if z < -1.6499999999999999e27 or 6.5e109 < z

    1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-+l+100.0%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + \left(z + x\right)} \]
      2. associate-+l+100.0%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]
      3. +-commutative100.0%

        \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)} + \left(y + x\right)\right) + \left(z + x\right) \]
      4. count-2100.0%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + x\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]
      5. +-commutative100.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]
      6. +-commutative100.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + z\right)} \]
    3. Simplified100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \left(x + z\right)} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(1 + \left(2 \cdot \frac{x + y}{z} + \frac{x}{z}\right)\right)} \]
    6. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-+r+99.9%

        \[\leadsto z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(1 + 2 \cdot \frac{x + y}{z}\right) + \frac{x}{z}\right)} \]
      2. distribute-rgt-in99.9%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + 2 \cdot \frac{x + y}{z}\right) \cdot z + \frac{x}{z} \cdot z} \]
      3. clear-num99.8%

        \[\leadsto \left(1 + 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{z}{x + y}}}\right) \cdot z + \frac{x}{z} \cdot z \]
      4. un-div-inv99.8%

        \[\leadsto \left(1 + \color{blue}{\frac{2}{\frac{z}{x + y}}}\right) \cdot z + \frac{x}{z} \cdot z \]
      5. +-commutative99.8%

        \[\leadsto \left(1 + \frac{2}{\frac{z}{\color{blue}{y + x}}}\right) \cdot z + \frac{x}{z} \cdot z \]
    7. Applied egg-rr99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + \frac{2}{\frac{z}{y + x}}\right) \cdot z + \frac{x}{z} \cdot z} \]
    8. Taylor expanded in x around 0 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 + \frac{2}{\frac{z}{y + x}}\right) \cdot z + \color{blue}{x} \]
    9. Taylor expanded in z around inf 74.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} + x \]

    if -1.6499999999999999e27 < z < -2.79999999999999986e-181 or 3.50000000000000024e-179 < z < 2.1000000000000001e-78 or 6.5e-25 < z < 6.5e109

    1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative99.9%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right)\right)} + x \]
      2. associate-+l+99.9%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + x\right)} \]
      3. +-commutative99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right)\right)} \]
      4. +-commutative99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right)\right)}\right) \]
      5. associate-+l+99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(x + \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(y + y\right)\right)}\right)\right) \]
      6. associate-+r+99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + x\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right)}\right) \]
      7. associate-+r+99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + \left(x + x\right)\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right)} \]
      8. *-lft-identity99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(\left(\color{blue}{1 \cdot x} + \left(x + x\right)\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]
      9. metadata-eval99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(\left(\color{blue}{\left(--1\right)} \cdot x + \left(x + x\right)\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]
      10. count-299.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(\left(\left(--1\right) \cdot x + \color{blue}{2 \cdot x}\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]
      11. distribute-rgt-out99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\left(--1\right) + 2\right)} + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]
      12. fma-define99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \left(--1\right) + 2, y + y\right)} \]
      13. metadata-eval99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{1} + 2, y + y\right) \]
      14. metadata-eval99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{3}, y + y\right) \]
      15. count-299.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, \color{blue}{2 \cdot y}\right) \]
      16. *-commutative99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, \color{blue}{y \cdot 2}\right) \]
    3. Simplified99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, y \cdot 2\right)} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 56.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot y} \]

    if -2.79999999999999986e-181 < z < 3.50000000000000024e-179 or 2.1000000000000001e-78 < z < 6.5e-25

    1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative99.9%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right)\right)} + x \]
      2. associate-+l+99.9%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + x\right)} \]
      3. +-commutative99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right)\right)} \]
      4. +-commutative99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right)\right)}\right) \]
      5. associate-+l+99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(x + \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(y + y\right)\right)}\right)\right) \]
      6. associate-+r+99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + x\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right)}\right) \]
      7. associate-+r+99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + \left(x + x\right)\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right)} \]
      8. *-lft-identity99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(\left(\color{blue}{1 \cdot x} + \left(x + x\right)\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]
      9. metadata-eval99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(\left(\color{blue}{\left(--1\right)} \cdot x + \left(x + x\right)\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]
      10. count-299.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(\left(\left(--1\right) \cdot x + \color{blue}{2 \cdot x}\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]
      11. distribute-rgt-out99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\left(--1\right) + 2\right)} + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]
      12. fma-define99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \left(--1\right) + 2, y + y\right)} \]
      13. metadata-eval99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{1} + 2, y + y\right) \]
      14. metadata-eval99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{3}, y + y\right) \]
      15. count-299.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, \color{blue}{2 \cdot y}\right) \]
      16. *-commutative99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, \color{blue}{y \cdot 2}\right) \]
    3. Simplified99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, y \cdot 2\right)} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 58.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{3 \cdot x} \]
  3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification63.3%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.65 \cdot 10^{+27}:\\ \;\;\;\;z + x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq -2.8 \cdot 10^{-181}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 3.5 \cdot 10^{-179}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 3\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 2.1 \cdot 10^{-78}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 6.5 \cdot 10^{-25}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 3\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 6.5 \cdot 10^{+109}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z + x\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 85.4% accurate, 0.6× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -2.15 \cdot 10^{-30}:\\ \;\;\;\;z + x \cdot 3\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 47:\\ \;\;\;\;z + y \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 3 + y \cdot 2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -2.15e-30)
   (+ z (* x 3.0))
   (if (<= x 47.0) (+ z (* y 2.0)) (+ (* x 3.0) (* y 2.0)))))
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -2.15e-30) {
		tmp = z + (x * 3.0);
	} else if (x <= 47.0) {
		tmp = z + (y * 2.0);
	} else {
		tmp = (x * 3.0) + (y * 2.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-2.15d-30)) then
        tmp = z + (x * 3.0d0)
    else if (x <= 47.0d0) then
        tmp = z + (y * 2.0d0)
    else
        tmp = (x * 3.0d0) + (y * 2.0d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -2.15e-30) {
		tmp = z + (x * 3.0);
	} else if (x <= 47.0) {
		tmp = z + (y * 2.0);
	} else {
		tmp = (x * 3.0) + (y * 2.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -2.15e-30:
		tmp = z + (x * 3.0)
	elif x <= 47.0:
		tmp = z + (y * 2.0)
	else:
		tmp = (x * 3.0) + (y * 2.0)
	return tmp
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -2.15e-30)
		tmp = Float64(z + Float64(x * 3.0));
	elseif (x <= 47.0)
		tmp = Float64(z + Float64(y * 2.0));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * 3.0) + Float64(y * 2.0));
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -2.15e-30)
		tmp = z + (x * 3.0);
	elseif (x <= 47.0)
		tmp = z + (y * 2.0);
	else
		tmp = (x * 3.0) + (y * 2.0);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[x, -2.15e-30], N[(z + N[(x * 3.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[x, 47.0], N[(z + N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(x * 3.0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;x \leq -2.15 \cdot 10^{-30}:\\
\;\;\;\;z + x \cdot 3\\

\mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 47:\\
\;\;\;\;z + y \cdot 2\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;x \cdot 3 + y \cdot 2\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 3 regimes
  2. if x < -2.14999999999999983e-30

    1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative99.9%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right)\right)} + x \]
      2. associate-+l+99.9%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + x\right)} \]
      3. +-commutative99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right)\right)} \]
      4. +-commutative99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right)\right)}\right) \]
      5. associate-+l+99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(x + \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(y + y\right)\right)}\right)\right) \]
      6. associate-+r+100.0%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + x\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right)}\right) \]
      7. associate-+r+100.0%

        \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + \left(x + x\right)\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right)} \]
      8. *-lft-identity100.0%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(\left(\color{blue}{1 \cdot x} + \left(x + x\right)\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]
      9. metadata-eval100.0%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(\left(\color{blue}{\left(--1\right)} \cdot x + \left(x + x\right)\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]
      10. count-2100.0%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(\left(\left(--1\right) \cdot x + \color{blue}{2 \cdot x}\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]
      11. distribute-rgt-out100.0%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\left(--1\right) + 2\right)} + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]
      12. fma-define99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \left(--1\right) + 2, y + y\right)} \]
      13. metadata-eval99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{1} + 2, y + y\right) \]
      14. metadata-eval99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{3}, y + y\right) \]
      15. count-299.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, \color{blue}{2 \cdot y}\right) \]
      16. *-commutative99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, \color{blue}{y \cdot 2}\right) \]
    3. Simplified99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, y \cdot 2\right)} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 81.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + 3 \cdot x} \]

    if -2.14999999999999983e-30 < x < 47

    1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative99.9%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right)\right)} + x \]
      2. associate-+l+100.0%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + x\right)} \]
      3. +-commutative100.0%

        \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right)\right)} \]
      4. +-commutative100.0%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right)\right)}\right) \]
      5. associate-+l+100.0%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(x + \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(y + y\right)\right)}\right)\right) \]
      6. associate-+r+100.0%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + x\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right)}\right) \]
      7. associate-+r+100.0%

        \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + \left(x + x\right)\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right)} \]
      8. *-lft-identity100.0%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(\left(\color{blue}{1 \cdot x} + \left(x + x\right)\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]
      9. metadata-eval100.0%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(\left(\color{blue}{\left(--1\right)} \cdot x + \left(x + x\right)\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]
      10. count-2100.0%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(\left(\left(--1\right) \cdot x + \color{blue}{2 \cdot x}\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]
      11. distribute-rgt-out100.0%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\left(--1\right) + 2\right)} + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]
      12. fma-define100.0%

        \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \left(--1\right) + 2, y + y\right)} \]
      13. metadata-eval100.0%

        \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{1} + 2, y + y\right) \]
      14. metadata-eval100.0%

        \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{3}, y + y\right) \]
      15. count-2100.0%

        \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, \color{blue}{2 \cdot y}\right) \]
      16. *-commutative100.0%

        \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, \color{blue}{y \cdot 2}\right) \]
    3. Simplified100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, y \cdot 2\right)} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 92.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + 2 \cdot y} \]

    if 47 < x

    1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative99.9%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right)\right)} + x \]
      2. associate-+l+99.9%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + x\right)} \]
      3. +-commutative99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right)\right)} \]
      4. +-commutative99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right)\right)}\right) \]
      5. associate-+l+99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(x + \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(y + y\right)\right)}\right)\right) \]
      6. associate-+r+99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + x\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right)}\right) \]
      7. associate-+r+99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + \left(x + x\right)\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right)} \]
      8. *-lft-identity99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(\left(\color{blue}{1 \cdot x} + \left(x + x\right)\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]
      9. metadata-eval99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(\left(\color{blue}{\left(--1\right)} \cdot x + \left(x + x\right)\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]
      10. count-299.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(\left(\left(--1\right) \cdot x + \color{blue}{2 \cdot x}\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]
      11. distribute-rgt-out99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\left(--1\right) + 2\right)} + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]
      12. fma-define99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \left(--1\right) + 2, y + y\right)} \]
      13. metadata-eval99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{1} + 2, y + y\right) \]
      14. metadata-eval99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{3}, y + y\right) \]
      15. count-299.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, \color{blue}{2 \cdot y}\right) \]
      16. *-commutative99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, \color{blue}{y \cdot 2}\right) \]
    3. Simplified99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, y \cdot 2\right)} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 84.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot y + 3 \cdot x} \]
  3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification88.3%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -2.15 \cdot 10^{-30}:\\ \;\;\;\;z + x \cdot 3\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 47:\\ \;\;\;\;z + y \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 3 + y \cdot 2\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 80.4% accurate, 0.7× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -6.4 \cdot 10^{+162} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1.15 \cdot 10^{+152}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 3\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z + y \cdot 2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -6.4e+162) (not (<= x 1.15e+152))) (* x 3.0) (+ z (* y 2.0))))
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -6.4e+162) || !(x <= 1.15e+152)) {
		tmp = x * 3.0;
	} else {
		tmp = z + (y * 2.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-6.4d+162)) .or. (.not. (x <= 1.15d+152))) then
        tmp = x * 3.0d0
    else
        tmp = z + (y * 2.0d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -6.4e+162) || !(x <= 1.15e+152)) {
		tmp = x * 3.0;
	} else {
		tmp = z + (y * 2.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -6.4e+162) or not (x <= 1.15e+152):
		tmp = x * 3.0
	else:
		tmp = z + (y * 2.0)
	return tmp
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -6.4e+162) || !(x <= 1.15e+152))
		tmp = Float64(x * 3.0);
	else
		tmp = Float64(z + Float64(y * 2.0));
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -6.4e+162) || ~((x <= 1.15e+152)))
		tmp = x * 3.0;
	else
		tmp = z + (y * 2.0);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -6.4e+162], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 1.15e+152]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * 3.0), $MachinePrecision], N[(z + N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;x \leq -6.4 \cdot 10^{+162} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1.15 \cdot 10^{+152}\right):\\
\;\;\;\;x \cdot 3\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;z + y \cdot 2\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if x < -6.4000000000000002e162 or 1.14999999999999993e152 < x

    1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative99.9%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right)\right)} + x \]
      2. associate-+l+99.9%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + x\right)} \]
      3. +-commutative99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right)\right)} \]
      4. +-commutative99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right)\right)}\right) \]
      5. associate-+l+99.8%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(x + \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(y + y\right)\right)}\right)\right) \]
      6. associate-+r+99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + x\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right)}\right) \]
      7. associate-+r+99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + \left(x + x\right)\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right)} \]
      8. *-lft-identity99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(\left(\color{blue}{1 \cdot x} + \left(x + x\right)\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]
      9. metadata-eval99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(\left(\color{blue}{\left(--1\right)} \cdot x + \left(x + x\right)\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]
      10. count-299.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(\left(\left(--1\right) \cdot x + \color{blue}{2 \cdot x}\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]
      11. distribute-rgt-out99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\left(--1\right) + 2\right)} + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]
      12. fma-define99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \left(--1\right) + 2, y + y\right)} \]
      13. metadata-eval99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{1} + 2, y + y\right) \]
      14. metadata-eval99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{3}, y + y\right) \]
      15. count-299.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, \color{blue}{2 \cdot y}\right) \]
      16. *-commutative99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, \color{blue}{y \cdot 2}\right) \]
    3. Simplified99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, y \cdot 2\right)} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 81.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{3 \cdot x} \]

    if -6.4000000000000002e162 < x < 1.14999999999999993e152

    1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative99.9%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right)\right)} + x \]
      2. associate-+l+100.0%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + x\right)} \]
      3. +-commutative100.0%

        \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right)\right)} \]
      4. +-commutative100.0%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right)\right)}\right) \]
      5. associate-+l+99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(x + \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(y + y\right)\right)}\right)\right) \]
      6. associate-+r+100.0%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + x\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right)}\right) \]
      7. associate-+r+100.0%

        \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + \left(x + x\right)\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right)} \]
      8. *-lft-identity100.0%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(\left(\color{blue}{1 \cdot x} + \left(x + x\right)\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]
      9. metadata-eval100.0%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(\left(\color{blue}{\left(--1\right)} \cdot x + \left(x + x\right)\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]
      10. count-2100.0%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(\left(\left(--1\right) \cdot x + \color{blue}{2 \cdot x}\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]
      11. distribute-rgt-out100.0%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\left(--1\right) + 2\right)} + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]
      12. fma-define99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \left(--1\right) + 2, y + y\right)} \]
      13. metadata-eval99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{1} + 2, y + y\right) \]
      14. metadata-eval99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{3}, y + y\right) \]
      15. count-299.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, \color{blue}{2 \cdot y}\right) \]
      16. *-commutative99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, \color{blue}{y \cdot 2}\right) \]
    3. Simplified99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, y \cdot 2\right)} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 83.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + 2 \cdot y} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification83.4%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -6.4 \cdot 10^{+162} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1.15 \cdot 10^{+152}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 3\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z + y \cdot 2\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 85.2% accurate, 0.7× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -2.15 \cdot 10^{-30} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 3.15 \cdot 10^{+41}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z + x \cdot 3\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z + y \cdot 2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -2.15e-30) (not (<= x 3.15e+41)))
   (+ z (* x 3.0))
   (+ z (* y 2.0))))
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -2.15e-30) || !(x <= 3.15e+41)) {
		tmp = z + (x * 3.0);
	} else {
		tmp = z + (y * 2.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-2.15d-30)) .or. (.not. (x <= 3.15d+41))) then
        tmp = z + (x * 3.0d0)
    else
        tmp = z + (y * 2.0d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -2.15e-30) || !(x <= 3.15e+41)) {
		tmp = z + (x * 3.0);
	} else {
		tmp = z + (y * 2.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -2.15e-30) or not (x <= 3.15e+41):
		tmp = z + (x * 3.0)
	else:
		tmp = z + (y * 2.0)
	return tmp
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -2.15e-30) || !(x <= 3.15e+41))
		tmp = Float64(z + Float64(x * 3.0));
	else
		tmp = Float64(z + Float64(y * 2.0));
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -2.15e-30) || ~((x <= 3.15e+41)))
		tmp = z + (x * 3.0);
	else
		tmp = z + (y * 2.0);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -2.15e-30], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 3.15e+41]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(z + N[(x * 3.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(z + N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;x \leq -2.15 \cdot 10^{-30} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 3.15 \cdot 10^{+41}\right):\\
\;\;\;\;z + x \cdot 3\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;z + y \cdot 2\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if x < -2.14999999999999983e-30 or 3.1499999999999999e41 < x

    1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative99.9%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right)\right)} + x \]
      2. associate-+l+99.9%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + x\right)} \]
      3. +-commutative99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right)\right)} \]
      4. +-commutative99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right)\right)}\right) \]
      5. associate-+l+99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(x + \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(y + y\right)\right)}\right)\right) \]
      6. associate-+r+99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + x\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right)}\right) \]
      7. associate-+r+99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + \left(x + x\right)\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right)} \]
      8. *-lft-identity99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(\left(\color{blue}{1 \cdot x} + \left(x + x\right)\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]
      9. metadata-eval99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(\left(\color{blue}{\left(--1\right)} \cdot x + \left(x + x\right)\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]
      10. count-299.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(\left(\left(--1\right) \cdot x + \color{blue}{2 \cdot x}\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]
      11. distribute-rgt-out99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\left(--1\right) + 2\right)} + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]
      12. fma-define99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \left(--1\right) + 2, y + y\right)} \]
      13. metadata-eval99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{1} + 2, y + y\right) \]
      14. metadata-eval99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{3}, y + y\right) \]
      15. count-299.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, \color{blue}{2 \cdot y}\right) \]
      16. *-commutative99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, \color{blue}{y \cdot 2}\right) \]
    3. Simplified99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, y \cdot 2\right)} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 82.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + 3 \cdot x} \]

    if -2.14999999999999983e-30 < x < 3.1499999999999999e41

    1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative99.9%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right)\right)} + x \]
      2. associate-+l+100.0%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + x\right)} \]
      3. +-commutative100.0%

        \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right)\right)} \]
      4. +-commutative100.0%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right)\right)}\right) \]
      5. associate-+l+100.0%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(x + \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(y + y\right)\right)}\right)\right) \]
      6. associate-+r+100.0%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + x\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right)}\right) \]
      7. associate-+r+100.0%

        \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + \left(x + x\right)\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right)} \]
      8. *-lft-identity100.0%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(\left(\color{blue}{1 \cdot x} + \left(x + x\right)\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]
      9. metadata-eval100.0%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(\left(\color{blue}{\left(--1\right)} \cdot x + \left(x + x\right)\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]
      10. count-2100.0%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(\left(\left(--1\right) \cdot x + \color{blue}{2 \cdot x}\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]
      11. distribute-rgt-out100.0%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\left(--1\right) + 2\right)} + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]
      12. fma-define100.0%

        \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \left(--1\right) + 2, y + y\right)} \]
      13. metadata-eval100.0%

        \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{1} + 2, y + y\right) \]
      14. metadata-eval100.0%

        \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{3}, y + y\right) \]
      15. count-2100.0%

        \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, \color{blue}{2 \cdot y}\right) \]
      16. *-commutative100.0%

        \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, \color{blue}{y \cdot 2}\right) \]
    3. Simplified100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, y \cdot 2\right)} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 91.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + 2 \cdot y} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification88.0%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -2.15 \cdot 10^{-30} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 3.15 \cdot 10^{+41}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z + x \cdot 3\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z + y \cdot 2\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 51.9% accurate, 0.8× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.75 \cdot 10^{+25}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 2.8 \cdot 10^{+113}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -1.75e+25) z (if (<= z 2.8e+113) (* y 2.0) z)))
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -1.75e+25) {
		tmp = z;
	} else if (z <= 2.8e+113) {
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = z;
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-1.75d+25)) then
        tmp = z
    else if (z <= 2.8d+113) then
        tmp = y * 2.0d0
    else
        tmp = z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -1.75e+25) {
		tmp = z;
	} else if (z <= 2.8e+113) {
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = z;
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -1.75e+25:
		tmp = z
	elif z <= 2.8e+113:
		tmp = y * 2.0
	else:
		tmp = z
	return tmp
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -1.75e+25)
		tmp = z;
	elseif (z <= 2.8e+113)
		tmp = Float64(y * 2.0);
	else
		tmp = z;
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -1.75e+25)
		tmp = z;
	elseif (z <= 2.8e+113)
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	else
		tmp = z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[z, -1.75e+25], z, If[LessEqual[z, 2.8e+113], N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision], z]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.75 \cdot 10^{+25}:\\
\;\;\;\;z\\

\mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 2.8 \cdot 10^{+113}:\\
\;\;\;\;y \cdot 2\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;z\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if z < -1.75e25 or 2.79999999999999998e113 < z

    1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative100.0%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right)\right)} + x \]
      2. associate-+l+100.0%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + x\right)} \]
      3. +-commutative100.0%

        \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right)\right)} \]
      4. +-commutative100.0%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right)\right)}\right) \]
      5. associate-+l+100.0%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(x + \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(y + y\right)\right)}\right)\right) \]
      6. associate-+r+100.0%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + x\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right)}\right) \]
      7. associate-+r+100.0%

        \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + \left(x + x\right)\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right)} \]
      8. *-lft-identity100.0%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(\left(\color{blue}{1 \cdot x} + \left(x + x\right)\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]
      9. metadata-eval100.0%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(\left(\color{blue}{\left(--1\right)} \cdot x + \left(x + x\right)\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]
      10. count-2100.0%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(\left(\left(--1\right) \cdot x + \color{blue}{2 \cdot x}\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]
      11. distribute-rgt-out100.0%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\left(--1\right) + 2\right)} + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]
      12. fma-define100.0%

        \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \left(--1\right) + 2, y + y\right)} \]
      13. metadata-eval100.0%

        \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{1} + 2, y + y\right) \]
      14. metadata-eval100.0%

        \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{3}, y + y\right) \]
      15. count-2100.0%

        \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, \color{blue}{2 \cdot y}\right) \]
      16. *-commutative100.0%

        \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, \color{blue}{y \cdot 2}\right) \]
    3. Simplified100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, y \cdot 2\right)} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 73.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]

    if -1.75e25 < z < 2.79999999999999998e113

    1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative99.9%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right)\right)} + x \]
      2. associate-+l+99.9%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + x\right)} \]
      3. +-commutative99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right)\right)} \]
      4. +-commutative99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right)\right)}\right) \]
      5. associate-+l+99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(x + \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(y + y\right)\right)}\right)\right) \]
      6. associate-+r+99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + x\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right)}\right) \]
      7. associate-+r+99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + \left(x + x\right)\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right)} \]
      8. *-lft-identity99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(\left(\color{blue}{1 \cdot x} + \left(x + x\right)\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]
      9. metadata-eval99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(\left(\color{blue}{\left(--1\right)} \cdot x + \left(x + x\right)\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]
      10. count-299.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(\left(\left(--1\right) \cdot x + \color{blue}{2 \cdot x}\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]
      11. distribute-rgt-out99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\left(--1\right) + 2\right)} + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]
      12. fma-define99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \left(--1\right) + 2, y + y\right)} \]
      13. metadata-eval99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{1} + 2, y + y\right) \]
      14. metadata-eval99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{3}, y + y\right) \]
      15. count-299.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, \color{blue}{2 \cdot y}\right) \]
      16. *-commutative99.9%

        \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, \color{blue}{y \cdot 2}\right) \]
    3. Simplified99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, y \cdot 2\right)} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 45.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot y} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification55.0%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.75 \cdot 10^{+25}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 2.8 \cdot 10^{+113}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 99.9% accurate, 1.2× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \left(z + x\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* 2.0 (+ x y)) (+ z x)))
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (2.0 * (x + y)) + (z + x);
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (2.0d0 * (x + y)) + (z + x)
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (2.0 * (x + y)) + (z + x);
}
def code(x, y, z):
	return (2.0 * (x + y)) + (z + x)
function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(2.0 * Float64(x + y)) + Float64(z + x))
end
function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (2.0 * (x + y)) + (z + x);
end
code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(2.0 * N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \left(z + x\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.9%

    \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate-+l+99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + \left(z + x\right)} \]
    2. associate-+l+99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]
    3. +-commutative99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)} + \left(y + x\right)\right) + \left(z + x\right) \]
    4. count-299.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + x\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]
    5. +-commutative99.9%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]
    6. +-commutative99.9%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + z\right)} \]
  3. Simplified99.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \left(x + z\right)} \]
  4. Add Preprocessing
  5. Final simplification99.9%

    \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \left(z + x\right) \]
  6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 34.0% accurate, 11.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ z \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 z)
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z;
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = z
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z;
}
def code(x, y, z):
	return z
function code(x, y, z)
	return z
end
function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = z;
end
code[x_, y_, z_] := z
\begin{array}{l}

\\
z
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.9%

    \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. +-commutative99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right)\right)} + x \]
    2. associate-+l+99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + x\right)} \]
    3. +-commutative99.9%

      \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right)\right)} \]
    4. +-commutative99.9%

      \[\leadsto z + \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right)\right)}\right) \]
    5. associate-+l+99.9%

      \[\leadsto z + \left(x + \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(y + y\right)\right)}\right)\right) \]
    6. associate-+r+99.9%

      \[\leadsto z + \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + x\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right)}\right) \]
    7. associate-+r+100.0%

      \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + \left(x + x\right)\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right)} \]
    8. *-lft-identity100.0%

      \[\leadsto z + \left(\left(\color{blue}{1 \cdot x} + \left(x + x\right)\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]
    9. metadata-eval100.0%

      \[\leadsto z + \left(\left(\color{blue}{\left(--1\right)} \cdot x + \left(x + x\right)\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]
    10. count-2100.0%

      \[\leadsto z + \left(\left(\left(--1\right) \cdot x + \color{blue}{2 \cdot x}\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]
    11. distribute-rgt-out100.0%

      \[\leadsto z + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\left(--1\right) + 2\right)} + \left(y + y\right)\right) \]
    12. fma-define99.9%

      \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \left(--1\right) + 2, y + y\right)} \]
    13. metadata-eval99.9%

      \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{1} + 2, y + y\right) \]
    14. metadata-eval99.9%

      \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{3}, y + y\right) \]
    15. count-299.9%

      \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, \color{blue}{2 \cdot y}\right) \]
    16. *-commutative99.9%

      \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, \color{blue}{y \cdot 2}\right) \]
  3. Simplified99.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, y \cdot 2\right)} \]
  4. Add Preprocessing
  5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 35.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]
  6. Final simplification35.1%

    \[\leadsto z \]
  7. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

?
herbie shell --seed 2024130 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Graphics.Rendering.Plot.Render.Plot.Legend:renderLegendInside from plot-0.2.3.4"
  :precision binary64
  (+ (+ (+ (+ (+ x y) y) x) z) x))