Optimisation.CirclePacking:place from circle-packing-0.1.0.4, G

Percentage Accurate: 100.0% → 100.0%

Time: 4.2s

Alternatives: 8

Speedup: 1.0×

• 20.8% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(z + 1\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* (+ x y) (+ z 1.0)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x + y) * (z + 1.0);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x + y) * (z + 1.0d0)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x + y) * (z + 1.0);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x + y) * (z + 1.0)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x + y) * Float64(z + 1.0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x + y) * (z + 1.0);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] * N[(z + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(z + 1\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* (+ x y) (+ z 1.0)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x + y) * (z + 1.0);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x + y) * (z + 1.0d0)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x + y) * (z + 1.0);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x + y) * (z + 1.0)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x + y) * Float64(z + 1.0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x + y) * (z + 1.0);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] * N[(z + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(z + 1\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* (+ x y) (+ z 1.0)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x + y) * (z + 1.0);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x + y) * (z + 1.0d0)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x + y) * (z + 1.0);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x + y) * (z + 1.0)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x + y) * Float64(z + 1.0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x + y) * (z + 1.0);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] * N[(z + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(z + 1\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(z + 1\right) \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 49.2% accurate, 0.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq -7.2 \cdot 10^{-129}:\\ \;\;\;\;y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq -1.15 \cdot 10^{-274}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1.7 \cdot 10^{-184}:\\ \;\;\;\;y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 4.3 \cdot 10^{-97}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 0.05:\\ \;\;\;\;y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -1.0)
   (* x z)
   (if (<= z -7.2e-129)
     y
     (if (<= z -1.15e-274)
       x
       (if (<= z 1.7e-184)
         y
         (if (<= z 4.3e-97) x (if (<= z 0.05) y (* x z))))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -1.0) {
		tmp = x * z;
	} else if (z <= -7.2e-129) {
		tmp = y;
	} else if (z <= -1.15e-274) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (z <= 1.7e-184) {
		tmp = y;
	} else if (z <= 4.3e-97) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (z <= 0.05) {
		tmp = y;
	} else {
		tmp = x * z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-1.0d0)) then
        tmp = x * z
    else if (z <= (-7.2d-129)) then
        tmp = y
    else if (z <= (-1.15d-274)) then
        tmp = x
    else if (z <= 1.7d-184) then
        tmp = y
    else if (z <= 4.3d-97) then
        tmp = x
    else if (z <= 0.05d0) then
        tmp = y
    else
        tmp = x * z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -1.0) {
		tmp = x * z;
	} else if (z <= -7.2e-129) {
		tmp = y;
	} else if (z <= -1.15e-274) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (z <= 1.7e-184) {
		tmp = y;
	} else if (z <= 4.3e-97) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (z <= 0.05) {
		tmp = y;
	} else {
		tmp = x * z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -1.0:
		tmp = x * z
	elif z <= -7.2e-129:
		tmp = y
	elif z <= -1.15e-274:
		tmp = x
	elif z <= 1.7e-184:
		tmp = y
	elif z <= 4.3e-97:
		tmp = x
	elif z <= 0.05:
		tmp = y
	else:
		tmp = x * z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -1.0)
		tmp = Float64(x * z);
	elseif (z <= -7.2e-129)
		tmp = y;
	elseif (z <= -1.15e-274)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (z <= 1.7e-184)
		tmp = y;
	elseif (z <= 4.3e-97)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (z <= 0.05)
		tmp = y;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * z);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -1.0)
		tmp = x * z;
	elseif (z <= -7.2e-129)
		tmp = y;
	elseif (z <= -1.15e-274)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (z <= 1.7e-184)
		tmp = y;
	elseif (z <= 4.3e-97)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (z <= 0.05)
		tmp = y;
	else
		tmp = x * z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[z, -1.0], N[(x * z), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, -7.2e-129], y, If[LessEqual[z, -1.15e-274], x, If[LessEqual[z, 1.7e-184], y, If[LessEqual[z, 4.3e-97], x, If[LessEqual[z, 0.05], y, N[(x * z), $MachinePrecision]]]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if z < -1 or 0.050000000000000003 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(z + 1\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 42.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 42.4%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z + 1\right)} \]

      2. distribute-lft-in 42.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot z + x \cdot 1} \]

      3. *-rgt-identity 42.4%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot z + \color{blue}{x} \]

   5. Applied egg-rr 42.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot z + x} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around inf 40.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot z} \]

   if -1 < z < -7.2e-129 or -1.14999999999999998e-274 < z < 1.70000000000000002e-184 or 4.3e-97 < z < 0.050000000000000003

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(z + 1\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 44.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(1 + z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 43.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y} \]

   if -7.2e-129 < z < -1.14999999999999998e-274 or 1.70000000000000002e-184 < z < 4.3e-97

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(z + 1\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 45.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 45.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 42.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq -7.2 \cdot 10^{-129}:\\ \;\;\;\;y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq -1.15 \cdot 10^{-274}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1.7 \cdot 10^{-184}:\\ \;\;\;\;y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 4.3 \cdot 10^{-97}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 0.05:\\ \;\;\;\;y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot z\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 74.7% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -0.000155 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 9.5 \cdot 10^{-5}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(z + 1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -0.000155) (not (<= z 9.5e-5))) (* x (+ z 1.0)) (+ x y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -0.000155) || !(z <= 9.5e-5)) {
		tmp = x * (z + 1.0);
	} else {
		tmp = x + y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-0.000155d0)) .or. (.not. (z <= 9.5d-5))) then
        tmp = x * (z + 1.0d0)
    else
        tmp = x + y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -0.000155) || !(z <= 9.5e-5)) {
		tmp = x * (z + 1.0);
	} else {
		tmp = x + y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -0.000155) or not (z <= 9.5e-5):
		tmp = x * (z + 1.0)
	else:
		tmp = x + y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -0.000155) || !(z <= 9.5e-5))
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(z + 1.0));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -0.000155) || ~((z <= 9.5e-5)))
		tmp = x * (z + 1.0);
	else
		tmp = x + y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -0.000155], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 9.5e-5]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[(z + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -1.55e-4 or 9.5000000000000005e-5 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(z + 1\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 42.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + z\right)} \]

   if -1.55e-4 < z < 9.5000000000000005e-5

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(z + 1\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]

   5. Simplified 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 70.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -0.000155 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 9.5 \cdot 10^{-5}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(z + 1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 97.9% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(x + y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -1.0) (not (<= z 1.0))) (* z (+ x y)) (+ x y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1.0) || !(z <= 1.0)) {
		tmp = z * (x + y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-1.0d0)) .or. (.not. (z <= 1.0d0))) then
        tmp = z * (x + y)
    else
        tmp = x + y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1.0) || !(z <= 1.0)) {
		tmp = z * (x + y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -1.0) or not (z <= 1.0):
		tmp = z * (x + y)
	else:
		tmp = x + y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -1.0) || !(z <= 1.0))
		tmp = Float64(z * Float64(x + y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -1.0) || ~((z <= 1.0)))
		tmp = z * (x + y);
	else
		tmp = x + y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -1.0], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 1.0]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(z * N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -1 or 1 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(z + 1\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 96.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(x + y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 96.3%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 96.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)} \]

   if -1 < z < 1

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(z + 1\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 99.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]

   5. Simplified 99.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 97.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(x + y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 74.1% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 26.5\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -1.0) (not (<= z 26.5))) (* x z) (+ x y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1.0) || !(z <= 26.5)) {
		tmp = x * z;
	} else {
		tmp = x + y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-1.0d0)) .or. (.not. (z <= 26.5d0))) then
        tmp = x * z
    else
        tmp = x + y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1.0) || !(z <= 26.5)) {
		tmp = x * z;
	} else {
		tmp = x + y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -1.0) or not (z <= 26.5):
		tmp = x * z
	else:
		tmp = x + y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -1.0) || !(z <= 26.5))
		tmp = Float64(x * z);
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -1.0) || ~((z <= 26.5)))
		tmp = x * z;
	else
		tmp = x + y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -1.0], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 26.5]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * z), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -1 or 26.5 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(z + 1\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 42.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 42.8%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z + 1\right)} \]

      2. distribute-lft-in 42.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot z + x \cdot 1} \]

      3. *-rgt-identity 42.7%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot z + \color{blue}{x} \]

   5. Applied egg-rr 42.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot z + x} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around inf 41.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot z} \]

   if -1 < z < 26.5

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(z + 1\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 99.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]

   5. Simplified 99.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 69.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 26.5\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 61.0% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -5.9 \cdot 10^{-152}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(z + 1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(z + 1\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -5.9e-152) (* x (+ z 1.0)) (* y (+ z 1.0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -5.9e-152) {
		tmp = x * (z + 1.0);
	} else {
		tmp = y * (z + 1.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-5.9d-152)) then
        tmp = x * (z + 1.0d0)
    else
        tmp = y * (z + 1.0d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -5.9e-152) {
		tmp = x * (z + 1.0);
	} else {
		tmp = y * (z + 1.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -5.9e-152:
		tmp = x * (z + 1.0)
	else:
		tmp = y * (z + 1.0)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -5.9e-152)
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(z + 1.0));
	else
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(z + 1.0));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -5.9e-152)
		tmp = x * (z + 1.0);
	else
		tmp = y * (z + 1.0);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[x, -5.9e-152], N[(x * N[(z + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(y * N[(z + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -5.90000000000000011e-152

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(z + 1\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 59.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + z\right)} \]

   if -5.90000000000000011e-152 < x

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(z + 1\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 61.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(1 + z\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 61.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -5.9 \cdot 10^{-152}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(z + 1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(z + 1\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 31.2% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 2.4 \cdot 10^{-151}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (if (<= y 2.4e-151) x y))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 2.4e-151) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 2.4d-151) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 2.4e-151) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 2.4e-151:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 2.4e-151)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = y;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 2.4e-151)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, 2.4e-151], x, y]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 2.4e-151

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(z + 1\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 53.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 33.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if 2.4e-151 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(z + 1\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 70.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(1 + z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 27.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 31.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 2.4 \cdot 10^{-151}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 26.6% accurate, 7.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(z + 1\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 46.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + z\right)} \]

4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 26.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

5. Final simplification 26.1%

   \[\leadsto x \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024130 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Optimisation.CirclePacking:place from circle-packing-0.1.0.4, G"
  :precision binary64
  (* (+ x y) (+ z 1.0)))