Sample trimmed logistic on [-pi, pi]

Percentage Accurate: 98.9% → 98.9%
Time: 16.8s
Alternatives: 11
Speedup: 1.3×

Specification

?
\[\left(2.328306437 \cdot 10^{-10} \leq u \land u \leq 1\right) \land \left(0 \leq s \land s \leq 1.0651631\right)\]
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t\_0\right) + t\_0} - 1\right) \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (let* ((t_0 (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s))))))
   (*
    (- s)
    (log
     (-
      (/ 1.0 (+ (* u (- (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s)))) t_0)) t_0))
      1.0)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	float t_0 = 1.0f / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s)));
	return -s * logf(((1.0f / ((u * ((1.0f / (1.0f + expf((-((float) M_PI) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - 1.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	t_0 = Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s))))
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u * Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(-Float32(pi)) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - Float32(1.0))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	t_0 = single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s)));
	tmp = -s * log(((single(1.0) / ((u * ((single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((-single(pi) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - single(1.0)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t\_0\right) + t\_0} - 1\right)
\end{array}
\end{array}

Sampling outcomes in binary32 precision:

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 11 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 98.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t\_0\right) + t\_0} - 1\right) \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (let* ((t_0 (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s))))))
   (*
    (- s)
    (log
     (-
      (/ 1.0 (+ (* u (- (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s)))) t_0)) t_0))
      1.0)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	float t_0 = 1.0f / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s)));
	return -s * logf(((1.0f / ((u * ((1.0f / (1.0f + expf((-((float) M_PI) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - 1.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	t_0 = Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s))))
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u * Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(-Float32(pi)) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - Float32(1.0))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	t_0 = single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s)));
	tmp = -s * log(((single(1.0) / ((u * ((single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((-single(pi) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - single(1.0)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t\_0\right) + t\_0} - 1\right)
\end{array}
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 98.9% accurate, 1.3× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + {e}^{\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)}}} + -1\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (*
  s
  (-
   (log
    (+
     (/
      1.0
      (+
       (/ u (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s))))
       (/ (- 1.0 u) (+ 1.0 (pow E (/ PI s))))))
     -1.0)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return s * -logf(((1.0f / ((u / (1.0f + expf((-((float) M_PI) / s)))) + ((1.0f - u) / (1.0f + powf(((float) M_E), (((float) M_PI) / s)))))) + -1.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(s * Float32(-log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(-Float32(pi)) / s)))) + Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) - u) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + (Float32(exp(1)) ^ Float32(Float32(pi) / s)))))) + Float32(-1.0)))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = s * -log(((single(1.0) / ((u / (single(1.0) + exp((-single(pi) / s)))) + ((single(1.0) - u) / (single(1.0) + (single(2.71828182845904523536) ^ (single(pi) / s)))))) + single(-1.0)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + {e}^{\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)}}} + -1\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.0%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified99.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Step-by-step derivation
    1. clear-num99.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{s}{\pi}}}}}} + -1\right) \]
    2. associate-/r/99.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{s} \cdot \pi}}}} + -1\right) \]
  5. Applied egg-rr99.0%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{s} \cdot \pi}}}} + -1\right) \]
  6. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate-*l/99.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{\frac{1 \cdot \pi}{s}}}}} + -1\right) \]
    2. *-un-lft-identity99.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\color{blue}{\pi}}{s}}}} + -1\right) \]
    3. *-un-lft-identity99.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}}} + -1\right) \]
    4. exp-prod99.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + \color{blue}{{\left(e^{1}\right)}^{\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)}}}} + -1\right) \]
  7. Applied egg-rr99.0%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + \color{blue}{{\left(e^{1}\right)}^{\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)}}}} + -1\right) \]
  8. Step-by-step derivation
    1. exp-1-e99.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + {\color{blue}{e}}^{\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)}}} + -1\right) \]
  9. Simplified99.0%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + \color{blue}{{e}^{\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)}}}} + -1\right) \]
  10. Final simplification99.0%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + {e}^{\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
  11. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 98.9% accurate, 1.3× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (*
  s
  (-
   (log
    (+
     -1.0
     (/
      1.0
      (+
       (/ u (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s))))
       (/ (- 1.0 u) (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s)))))))))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return s * -logf((-1.0f + (1.0f / ((u / (1.0f + expf((-((float) M_PI) / s)))) + ((1.0f - u) / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s))))))));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(s * Float32(-log(Float32(Float32(-1.0) + Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(-Float32(pi)) / s)))) + Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) - u) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s))))))))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = s * -log((single(-1.0) + (single(1.0) / ((u / (single(1.0) + exp((-single(pi) / s)))) + ((single(1.0) - u) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s))))))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.0%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified99.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Final simplification99.0%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right)\right) \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 97.6% accurate, 2.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{u} + \left(-1 + \frac{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}}{u}\right)\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (* s (- (log (+ (/ 1.0 u) (+ -1.0 (/ (exp (/ (- PI) s)) u)))))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return s * -logf(((1.0f / u) + (-1.0f + (expf((-((float) M_PI) / s)) / u))));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(s * Float32(-log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / u) + Float32(Float32(-1.0) + Float32(exp(Float32(Float32(-Float32(pi)) / s)) / u))))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = s * -log(((single(1.0) / u) + (single(-1.0) + (exp((-single(pi) / s)) / u))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{u} + \left(-1 + \frac{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}}{u}\right)\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.0%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified99.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Taylor expanded in s around inf 84.0%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + \color{blue}{\left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right)}}} + -1\right) \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. +-commutative84.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{\pi}{s} + 1\right)}}} + -1\right) \]
  6. Simplified84.0%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{\pi}{s} + 1\right)}}} + -1\right) \]
  7. Taylor expanded in s around 0 97.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(s \cdot \log \left(\left(\frac{1}{u} + \frac{e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}{u}\right) - 1\right)\right)} \]
  8. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate-*r*97.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot s\right) \cdot \log \left(\left(\frac{1}{u} + \frac{e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}{u}\right) - 1\right)} \]
    2. neg-mul-197.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right)} \cdot \log \left(\left(\frac{1}{u} + \frac{e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}{u}\right) - 1\right) \]
    3. associate--l+97.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{u} + \left(\frac{e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}{u} - 1\right)\right)} \]
    4. neg-mul-197.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u} + \left(\frac{e^{\color{blue}{-\frac{\pi}{s}}}}{u} - 1\right)\right) \]
    5. distribute-neg-frac297.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u} + \left(\frac{e^{\color{blue}{\frac{\pi}{-s}}}}{u} - 1\right)\right) \]
  9. Simplified97.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u} + \left(\frac{e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}}{u} - 1\right)\right)} \]
  10. Final simplification97.1%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{u} + \left(-1 + \frac{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}}{u}\right)\right)\right) \]
  11. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 25.1% accurate, 4.1× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \left(-\mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (* s (- (log1p (/ PI s)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return s * -log1pf((((float) M_PI) / s));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(s * Float32(-log1p(Float32(Float32(pi) / s))))
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \left(-\mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.0%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified99.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Taylor expanded in s around inf 84.0%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + \color{blue}{\left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right)}}} + -1\right) \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. +-commutative84.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{\pi}{s} + 1\right)}}} + -1\right) \]
  6. Simplified84.0%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{\pi}{s} + 1\right)}}} + -1\right) \]
  7. Taylor expanded in u around 0 25.2%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(s \cdot \log \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right)\right)} \]
  8. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate-*r*25.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot s\right) \cdot \log \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right)} \]
    2. neg-mul-125.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right)} \cdot \log \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right) \]
    3. log1p-define25.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)} \]
  9. Simplified25.2%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)} \]
  10. Final simplification25.2%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)\right) \]
  11. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 11.6% accurate, 25.5× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 4 \cdot \left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(\left(u \cdot \pi\right) \cdot -0.25 + \pi \cdot 0.25\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (* 4.0 (- (* 0.25 (* u PI)) (+ (* (* u PI) -0.25) (* PI 0.25)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return 4.0f * ((0.25f * (u * ((float) M_PI))) - (((u * ((float) M_PI)) * -0.25f) + (((float) M_PI) * 0.25f)));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(4.0) * Float32(Float32(Float32(0.25) * Float32(u * Float32(pi))) - Float32(Float32(Float32(u * Float32(pi)) * Float32(-0.25)) + Float32(Float32(pi) * Float32(0.25)))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = single(4.0) * ((single(0.25) * (u * single(pi))) - (((u * single(pi)) * single(-0.25)) + (single(pi) * single(0.25))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
4 \cdot \left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(\left(u \cdot \pi\right) \cdot -0.25 + \pi \cdot 0.25\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.0%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified99.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Taylor expanded in s around inf 12.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)\right)} \]
  5. Final simplification12.1%

    \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(\left(u \cdot \pi\right) \cdot -0.25 + \pi \cdot 0.25\right)\right) \]
  6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 16.2% accurate, 25.5× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \left(\left(u \cdot -4\right) \cdot \left(\frac{1}{-1 + \left(\frac{\pi}{s} + -1\right)} - -0.5\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (* s (* (* u -4.0) (- (/ 1.0 (+ -1.0 (+ (/ PI s) -1.0))) -0.5))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return s * ((u * -4.0f) * ((1.0f / (-1.0f + ((((float) M_PI) / s) + -1.0f))) - -0.5f));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(s * Float32(Float32(u * Float32(-4.0)) * Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(-1.0) + Float32(Float32(Float32(pi) / s) + Float32(-1.0)))) - Float32(-0.5))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = s * ((u * single(-4.0)) * ((single(1.0) / (single(-1.0) + ((single(pi) / s) + single(-1.0)))) - single(-0.5)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \left(\left(u \cdot -4\right) \cdot \left(\frac{1}{-1 + \left(\frac{\pi}{s} + -1\right)} - -0.5\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.0%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified99.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Taylor expanded in s around inf 9.1%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + \color{blue}{1}}} + -1\right) \]
  5. Taylor expanded in u around 0 8.9%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}} - 0.5\right)\right)\right)} \]
  6. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate-*r*8.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(-4 \cdot u\right) \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}} - 0.5\right)\right)} \]
    2. sub-neg8.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \left(\left(-4 \cdot u\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}} + \left(-0.5\right)\right)}\right) \]
    3. neg-mul-18.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \left(\left(-4 \cdot u\right) \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{-\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + \left(-0.5\right)\right)\right) \]
    4. distribute-neg-frac28.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \left(\left(-4 \cdot u\right) \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{\frac{\pi}{-s}}}} + \left(-0.5\right)\right)\right) \]
    5. metadata-eval8.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \left(\left(-4 \cdot u\right) \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \color{blue}{-0.5}\right)\right) \]
  7. Simplified8.9%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(-4 \cdot u\right) \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + -0.5\right)\right)} \]
  8. Taylor expanded in s around inf 16.3%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \left(\left(-4 \cdot u\right) \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + \color{blue}{\left(1 + -1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}\right)}} + -0.5\right)\right) \]
  9. Step-by-step derivation
    1. neg-mul-116.3%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \left(\left(-4 \cdot u\right) \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{\pi}{s}\right)}\right)} + -0.5\right)\right) \]
    2. unsub-neg16.3%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \left(\left(-4 \cdot u\right) \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + \color{blue}{\left(1 - \frac{\pi}{s}\right)}} + -0.5\right)\right) \]
  10. Simplified16.3%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \left(\left(-4 \cdot u\right) \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + \color{blue}{\left(1 - \frac{\pi}{s}\right)}} + -0.5\right)\right) \]
  11. Final simplification16.3%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\left(u \cdot -4\right) \cdot \left(\frac{1}{-1 + \left(\frac{\pi}{s} + -1\right)} - -0.5\right)\right) \]
  12. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 11.6% accurate, 28.9× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(0.25 + u \cdot -0.25\right) + u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (* -4.0 (+ (* PI (+ 0.25 (* u -0.25))) (* u (* PI -0.25)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return -4.0f * ((((float) M_PI) * (0.25f + (u * -0.25f))) + (u * (((float) M_PI) * -0.25f)));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(-4.0) * Float32(Float32(Float32(pi) * Float32(Float32(0.25) + Float32(u * Float32(-0.25)))) + Float32(u * Float32(Float32(pi) * Float32(-0.25)))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = single(-4.0) * ((single(pi) * (single(0.25) + (u * single(-0.25)))) + (u * (single(pi) * single(-0.25))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
-4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(0.25 + u \cdot -0.25\right) + u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.0%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified99.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Taylor expanded in s around -inf 12.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)\right)} \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate--r+12.1%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \pi\right) - 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)} \]
    2. cancel-sign-sub-inv12.1%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \pi\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)} \]
    3. cancel-sign-sub-inv12.1%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + \left(--0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right)} + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    4. metadata-eval12.1%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + \color{blue}{0.25} \cdot \pi\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    5. +-commutative12.1%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(0.25 \cdot \pi + -0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)} + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    6. associate-*r*12.1%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\left(0.25 \cdot \pi + \color{blue}{\left(-0.25 \cdot u\right) \cdot \pi}\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    7. distribute-rgt-out12.1%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\pi \cdot \left(0.25 + -0.25 \cdot u\right)} + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    8. *-commutative12.1%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(0.25 + \color{blue}{u \cdot -0.25}\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    9. metadata-eval12.1%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(0.25 + u \cdot -0.25\right) + \color{blue}{-0.25} \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    10. *-commutative12.1%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(0.25 + u \cdot -0.25\right) + \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \pi\right) \cdot -0.25}\right) \]
    11. associate-*l*12.1%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(0.25 + u \cdot -0.25\right) + \color{blue}{u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25\right)}\right) \]
  6. Simplified12.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(0.25 + u \cdot -0.25\right) + u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25\right)\right)} \]
  7. Final simplification12.1%

    \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(0.25 + u \cdot -0.25\right) + u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25\right)\right) \]
  8. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 11.3% accurate, 48.1× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \frac{0.25}{u}\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (* -4.0 (* u (* PI (/ 0.25 u)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return -4.0f * (u * (((float) M_PI) * (0.25f / u)));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(-4.0) * Float32(u * Float32(Float32(pi) * Float32(Float32(0.25) / u))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = single(-4.0) * (u * (single(pi) * (single(0.25) / u)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
-4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \frac{0.25}{u}\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.0%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified99.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Taylor expanded in s around -inf 12.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)\right)} \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate--r+12.1%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \pi\right) - 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)} \]
    2. cancel-sign-sub-inv12.1%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \pi\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)} \]
    3. cancel-sign-sub-inv12.1%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + \left(--0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right)} + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    4. metadata-eval12.1%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + \color{blue}{0.25} \cdot \pi\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    5. +-commutative12.1%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(0.25 \cdot \pi + -0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)} + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    6. associate-*r*12.1%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\left(0.25 \cdot \pi + \color{blue}{\left(-0.25 \cdot u\right) \cdot \pi}\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    7. distribute-rgt-out12.1%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\pi \cdot \left(0.25 + -0.25 \cdot u\right)} + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    8. *-commutative12.1%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(0.25 + \color{blue}{u \cdot -0.25}\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    9. metadata-eval12.1%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(0.25 + u \cdot -0.25\right) + \color{blue}{-0.25} \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    10. *-commutative12.1%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(0.25 + u \cdot -0.25\right) + \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \pi\right) \cdot -0.25}\right) \]
    11. associate-*l*12.1%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(0.25 + u \cdot -0.25\right) + \color{blue}{u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25\right)}\right) \]
  6. Simplified12.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(0.25 + u \cdot -0.25\right) + u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25\right)\right)} \]
  7. Taylor expanded in u around inf 12.1%

    \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \left(-0.5 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \frac{\pi}{u}\right)\right)} \]
  8. Taylor expanded in u around 0 11.8%

    \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.25 \cdot \frac{\pi}{u}\right)}\right) \]
  9. Step-by-step derivation
    1. *-commutative11.8%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{\pi}{u} \cdot 0.25\right)}\right) \]
    2. *-rgt-identity11.8%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\frac{\color{blue}{\pi \cdot 1}}{u} \cdot 0.25\right)\right) \]
    3. associate-*r/11.8%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot \frac{1}{u}\right)} \cdot 0.25\right)\right) \]
    4. associate-*l*11.8%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot \left(\frac{1}{u} \cdot 0.25\right)\right)}\right) \]
    5. *-commutative11.8%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.25 \cdot \frac{1}{u}\right)}\right)\right) \]
    6. associate-*r/11.8%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{0.25 \cdot 1}{u}}\right)\right) \]
    7. metadata-eval11.8%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{0.25}}{u}\right)\right) \]
  10. Simplified11.8%

    \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot \frac{0.25}{u}\right)}\right) \]
  11. Final simplification11.8%

    \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \frac{0.25}{u}\right)\right) \]
  12. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 11.6% accurate, 48.1× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(0.25 + u \cdot -0.5\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (* -4.0 (* PI (+ 0.25 (* u -0.5)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return -4.0f * (((float) M_PI) * (0.25f + (u * -0.5f)));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(-4.0) * Float32(Float32(pi) * Float32(Float32(0.25) + Float32(u * Float32(-0.5)))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = single(-4.0) * (single(pi) * (single(0.25) + (u * single(-0.5))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
-4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(0.25 + u \cdot -0.5\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.0%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified99.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Taylor expanded in s around -inf 12.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)\right)} \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate--r+12.1%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \pi\right) - 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)} \]
    2. cancel-sign-sub-inv12.1%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \pi\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)} \]
    3. cancel-sign-sub-inv12.1%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + \left(--0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right)} + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    4. metadata-eval12.1%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + \color{blue}{0.25} \cdot \pi\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    5. +-commutative12.1%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(0.25 \cdot \pi + -0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)} + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    6. associate-*r*12.1%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\left(0.25 \cdot \pi + \color{blue}{\left(-0.25 \cdot u\right) \cdot \pi}\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    7. distribute-rgt-out12.1%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\pi \cdot \left(0.25 + -0.25 \cdot u\right)} + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    8. *-commutative12.1%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(0.25 + \color{blue}{u \cdot -0.25}\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    9. metadata-eval12.1%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(0.25 + u \cdot -0.25\right) + \color{blue}{-0.25} \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    10. *-commutative12.1%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(0.25 + u \cdot -0.25\right) + \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \pi\right) \cdot -0.25}\right) \]
    11. associate-*l*12.1%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(0.25 + u \cdot -0.25\right) + \color{blue}{u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25\right)}\right) \]
  6. Simplified12.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(0.25 + u \cdot -0.25\right) + u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25\right)\right)} \]
  7. Taylor expanded in u around 0 12.1%

    \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-0.5 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)} \]
  8. Step-by-step derivation
    1. +-commutative12.1%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.25 \cdot \pi + -0.5 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)} \]
    2. associate-*r*12.1%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(0.25 \cdot \pi + \color{blue}{\left(-0.5 \cdot u\right) \cdot \pi}\right) \]
    3. distribute-rgt-out12.1%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot \left(0.25 + -0.5 \cdot u\right)\right)} \]
  9. Simplified12.1%

    \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot \left(0.25 + -0.5 \cdot u\right)\right)} \]
  10. Final simplification12.1%

    \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(0.25 + u \cdot -0.5\right)\right) \]
  11. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 11.3% accurate, 61.9× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{-1}{\frac{\frac{s}{\pi}}{s}} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (/ -1.0 (/ (/ s PI) s)))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return -1.0f / ((s / ((float) M_PI)) / s);
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(-1.0) / Float32(Float32(s / Float32(pi)) / s))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = single(-1.0) / ((s / single(pi)) / s);
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\frac{-1}{\frac{\frac{s}{\pi}}{s}}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.0%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified99.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Applied egg-rr6.2%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0 - \log \left({\left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)}^{s}\right)} \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. neg-sub06.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\log \left({\left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)}^{s}\right)} \]
  6. Simplified6.2%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\log \left({\left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + 0}\right)}^{s}\right)} \]
  7. Step-by-step derivation
    1. log-pow6.2%

      \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{s \cdot \log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + 0}\right)} \]
    2. inv-pow6.2%

      \[\leadsto -s \cdot \log \left(-1 + \color{blue}{{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + 0\right)}^{-1}}\right) \]
    3. +-rgt-identity6.2%

      \[\leadsto -s \cdot \log \left(-1 + {\color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right)}}^{-1}\right) \]
    4. inv-pow6.2%

      \[\leadsto -s \cdot \log \left(-1 + {\color{blue}{\left({\left(1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}\right)}^{-1}\right)}}^{-1}\right) \]
    5. pow-pow6.2%

      \[\leadsto -s \cdot \log \left(-1 + \color{blue}{{\left(1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}\right)}^{\left(-1 \cdot -1\right)}}\right) \]
    6. metadata-eval6.2%

      \[\leadsto -s \cdot \log \left(-1 + {\left(1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}\right)}^{\color{blue}{1}}\right) \]
    7. pow16.2%

      \[\leadsto -s \cdot \log \left(-1 + \color{blue}{\left(1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}\right)}\right) \]
  8. Applied egg-rr6.2%

    \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{s \cdot \log \left(-1 + \left(1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}\right)\right)} \]
  9. Step-by-step derivation
    1. +-commutative6.2%

      \[\leadsto -s \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\left(1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}\right) + -1\right)} \]
    2. metadata-eval6.2%

      \[\leadsto -s \cdot \log \left(\left(1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-1\right)}\right) \]
    3. sub-neg6.2%

      \[\leadsto -s \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\left(1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}\right) - 1\right)} \]
    4. associate--l+6.2%

      \[\leadsto -s \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(e^{\frac{\pi}{s}} - 1\right)\right)} \]
    5. expm1-undefine6.2%

      \[\leadsto -s \cdot \log \left(1 + \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)}\right) \]
    6. log1p-define6.2%

      \[\leadsto -s \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\mathsf{expm1}\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)\right)} \]
    7. log1p-expm111.8%

      \[\leadsto -s \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\pi}{s}} \]
  10. Simplified11.8%

    \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{s \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}} \]
  11. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate-*r/11.8%

      \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\frac{s \cdot \pi}{s}} \]
  12. Applied egg-rr11.8%

    \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\frac{s \cdot \pi}{s}} \]
  13. Step-by-step derivation
    1. clear-num11.8%

      \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{s}{s \cdot \pi}}} \]
    2. inv-pow11.8%

      \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{{\left(\frac{s}{s \cdot \pi}\right)}^{-1}} \]
    3. *-commutative11.8%

      \[\leadsto -{\left(\frac{s}{\color{blue}{\pi \cdot s}}\right)}^{-1} \]
  14. Applied egg-rr11.8%

    \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{{\left(\frac{s}{\pi \cdot s}\right)}^{-1}} \]
  15. Step-by-step derivation
    1. unpow-111.8%

      \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{s}{\pi \cdot s}}} \]
    2. associate-/r*11.8%

      \[\leadsto -\frac{1}{\color{blue}{\frac{\frac{s}{\pi}}{s}}} \]
  16. Simplified11.8%

    \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{\frac{s}{\pi}}{s}}} \]
  17. Final simplification11.8%

    \[\leadsto \frac{-1}{\frac{\frac{s}{\pi}}{s}} \]
  18. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 11.3% accurate, 216.5× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -\pi \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (- PI))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return -((float) M_PI);
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(-Float32(pi))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = -single(pi);
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
-\pi
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.0%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified99.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Taylor expanded in u around 0 11.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \pi} \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. neg-mul-111.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\pi} \]
  6. Simplified11.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\pi} \]
  7. Final simplification11.8%

    \[\leadsto -\pi \]
  8. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

?
herbie shell --seed 2024130 
(FPCore (u s)
  :name "Sample trimmed logistic on [-pi, pi]"
  :precision binary32
  :pre (and (and (<= 2.328306437e-10 u) (<= u 1.0)) (and (<= 0.0 s) (<= s 1.0651631)))
  (* (- s) (log (- (/ 1.0 (+ (* u (- (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s)))) (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s)))))) (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s)))))) 1.0))))