math.exp on complex, imaginary part

Percentage Accurate: 100.0% → 100.0%

Time: 9.3s

Alternatives: 13

Speedup: 1.0×

• 25.3% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ e^{re} \cdot \sin im \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im) :precision binary64 (* (exp re) (sin im)))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	return exp(re) * sin(im);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    code = exp(re) * sin(im)
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	return Math.exp(re) * Math.sin(im);
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	return math.exp(re) * math.sin(im)

Julia

function code(re, im)
	return Float64(exp(re) * sin(im))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(re, im)
	tmp = exp(re) * sin(im);
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := N[(N[Exp[re], $MachinePrecision] * N[Sin[im], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ e^{re} \cdot \sin im \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im) :precision binary64 (* (exp re) (sin im)))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	return exp(re) * sin(im);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    code = exp(re) * sin(im)
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	return Math.exp(re) * Math.sin(im);
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	return math.exp(re) * math.sin(im)

Julia

function code(re, im)
	return Float64(exp(re) * sin(im))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(re, im)
	tmp = exp(re) * sin(im);
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := N[(N[Exp[re], $MachinePrecision] * N[Sin[im], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ e^{re} \cdot \sin im \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im) :precision binary64 (* (exp re) (sin im)))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	return exp(re) * sin(im);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    code = exp(re) * sin(im)
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	return Math.exp(re) * Math.sin(im);
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	return math.exp(re) * math.sin(im)

Julia

function code(re, im)
	return Float64(exp(re) * sin(im))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(re, im)
	tmp = exp(re) * sin(im);
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := N[(N[Exp[re], $MachinePrecision] * N[Sin[im], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[e^{re} \cdot \sin im \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 92.2% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;e^{re} \leq 0.999998 \lor \neg \left(e^{re} \leq 2\right):\\ \;\;\;\;e^{re} \cdot im\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\sin im\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (exp re) 0.999998) (not (<= (exp re) 2.0)))
   (* (exp re) im)
   (sin im)))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if ((exp(re) <= 0.999998) || !(exp(re) <= 2.0)) {
		tmp = exp(re) * im;
	} else {
		tmp = sin(im);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((exp(re) <= 0.999998d0) .or. (.not. (exp(re) <= 2.0d0))) then
        tmp = exp(re) * im
    else
        tmp = sin(im)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if ((Math.exp(re) <= 0.999998) || !(Math.exp(re) <= 2.0)) {
		tmp = Math.exp(re) * im;
	} else {
		tmp = Math.sin(im);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	tmp = 0
	if (math.exp(re) <= 0.999998) or not (math.exp(re) <= 2.0):
		tmp = math.exp(re) * im
	else:
		tmp = math.sin(im)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((exp(re) <= 0.999998) || !(exp(re) <= 2.0))
		tmp = Float64(exp(re) * im);
	else
		tmp = sin(im);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((exp(re) <= 0.999998) || ~((exp(re) <= 2.0)))
		tmp = exp(re) * im;
	else
		tmp = sin(im);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[Exp[re], $MachinePrecision], 0.999998], N[Not[LessEqual[N[Exp[re], $MachinePrecision], 2.0]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[Exp[re], $MachinePrecision] * im), $MachinePrecision], N[Sin[im], $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (exp.f64 re) < 0.999998000000000054 or 2 < (exp.f64 re)

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{re} \cdot \sin im \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in im around 0 87.0%

      \[\leadsto e^{re} \cdot \color{blue}{im} \]

   if 0.999998000000000054 < (exp.f64 re) < 2

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{re} \cdot \sin im \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in re around 0 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sin im} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 93.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;e^{re} \leq 0.999998 \lor \neg \left(e^{re} \leq 2\right):\\ \;\;\;\;e^{re} \cdot im\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\sin im\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 97.1% accurate, 1.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;re \leq -2.7 \cdot 10^{-6}:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{re} \cdot im\\ \mathbf{elif}\;re \leq 0.00028:\\ \;\;\;\;\sin im \cdot \left(re + 1\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;re \leq 1.02 \cdot 10^{+103}:\\ \;\;\;\;im \cdot \left(\left(e^{re} + 1\right) + -1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\sin im \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + re \cdot 0.16666666666666666\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= re -2.7e-6)
   (* (exp re) im)
   (if (<= re 0.00028)
     (* (sin im) (+ re 1.0))
     (if (<= re 1.02e+103)
       (* im (+ (+ (exp re) 1.0) -1.0))
       (*
        (sin im)
        (+ 1.0 (* re (+ 1.0 (* re (+ 0.5 (* re 0.16666666666666666)))))))))))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if (re <= -2.7e-6) {
		tmp = exp(re) * im;
	} else if (re <= 0.00028) {
		tmp = sin(im) * (re + 1.0);
	} else if (re <= 1.02e+103) {
		tmp = im * ((exp(re) + 1.0) + -1.0);
	} else {
		tmp = sin(im) * (1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * (0.5 + (re * 0.16666666666666666))))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (re <= (-2.7d-6)) then
        tmp = exp(re) * im
    else if (re <= 0.00028d0) then
        tmp = sin(im) * (re + 1.0d0)
    else if (re <= 1.02d+103) then
        tmp = im * ((exp(re) + 1.0d0) + (-1.0d0))
    else
        tmp = sin(im) * (1.0d0 + (re * (1.0d0 + (re * (0.5d0 + (re * 0.16666666666666666d0))))))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if (re <= -2.7e-6) {
		tmp = Math.exp(re) * im;
	} else if (re <= 0.00028) {
		tmp = Math.sin(im) * (re + 1.0);
	} else if (re <= 1.02e+103) {
		tmp = im * ((Math.exp(re) + 1.0) + -1.0);
	} else {
		tmp = Math.sin(im) * (1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * (0.5 + (re * 0.16666666666666666))))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	tmp = 0
	if re <= -2.7e-6:
		tmp = math.exp(re) * im
	elif re <= 0.00028:
		tmp = math.sin(im) * (re + 1.0)
	elif re <= 1.02e+103:
		tmp = im * ((math.exp(re) + 1.0) + -1.0)
	else:
		tmp = math.sin(im) * (1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * (0.5 + (re * 0.16666666666666666))))))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (re <= -2.7e-6)
		tmp = Float64(exp(re) * im);
	elseif (re <= 0.00028)
		tmp = Float64(sin(im) * Float64(re + 1.0));
	elseif (re <= 1.02e+103)
		tmp = Float64(im * Float64(Float64(exp(re) + 1.0) + -1.0));
	else
		tmp = Float64(sin(im) * Float64(1.0 + Float64(re * Float64(1.0 + Float64(re * Float64(0.5 + Float64(re * 0.16666666666666666)))))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (re <= -2.7e-6)
		tmp = exp(re) * im;
	elseif (re <= 0.00028)
		tmp = sin(im) * (re + 1.0);
	elseif (re <= 1.02e+103)
		tmp = im * ((exp(re) + 1.0) + -1.0);
	else
		tmp = sin(im) * (1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * (0.5 + (re * 0.16666666666666666))))));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := If[LessEqual[re, -2.7e-6], N[(N[Exp[re], $MachinePrecision] * im), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[re, 0.00028], N[(N[Sin[im], $MachinePrecision] * N[(re + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[re, 1.02e+103], N[(im * N[(N[(N[Exp[re], $MachinePrecision] + 1.0), $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[Sin[im], $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.0 + N[(re * N[(1.0 + N[(re * N[(0.5 + N[(re * 0.16666666666666666), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 4 regimes

2. if re < -2.69999999999999998e-6

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{re} \cdot \sin im \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in im around 0 99.7%

      \[\leadsto e^{re} \cdot \color{blue}{im} \]

   if -2.69999999999999998e-6 < re < 2.7999999999999998e-4

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{re} \cdot \sin im \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in re around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sin im + re \cdot \sin im} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-rgt1-in 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(re + 1\right) \cdot \sin im} \]

   5. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(re + 1\right) \cdot \sin im} \]

   if 2.7999999999999998e-4 < re < 1.01999999999999991e103

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{re} \cdot \sin im \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in im around 0 73.1%

      \[\leadsto e^{re} \cdot \color{blue}{im} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. expm1-log1p-u 73.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{re}\right)\right)} \cdot im \]

      2. expm1-undefine 73.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{re}\right)} - 1\right)} \cdot im \]

      3. log1p-undefine 73.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(e^{\color{blue}{\log \left(1 + e^{re}\right)}} - 1\right) \cdot im \]

      4. rem-exp-log 73.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + e^{re}\right)} - 1\right) \cdot im \]

   5. Applied egg-rr 73.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(1 + e^{re}\right) - 1\right)} \cdot im \]

   if 1.01999999999999991e103 < re

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{re} \cdot \sin im \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in re around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + 0.16666666666666666 \cdot re\right)\right)\right)} \cdot \sin im \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + \color{blue}{re \cdot 0.16666666666666666}\right)\right)\right) \cdot \sin im \]

   5. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + re \cdot 0.16666666666666666\right)\right)\right)} \cdot \sin im \]
3. Recombined 4 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 97.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;re \leq -2.7 \cdot 10^{-6}:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{re} \cdot im\\ \mathbf{elif}\;re \leq 0.00028:\\ \;\;\;\;\sin im \cdot \left(re + 1\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;re \leq 1.02 \cdot 10^{+103}:\\ \;\;\;\;im \cdot \left(\left(e^{re} + 1\right) + -1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\sin im \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + re \cdot 0.16666666666666666\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 95.9% accurate, 1.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := e^{re} \cdot im\\ \mathbf{if}\;re \leq -2.7 \cdot 10^{-6}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;re \leq 0.00044:\\ \;\;\;\;\sin im \cdot \left(re + 1\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;re \leq 1.9 \cdot 10^{+154}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\sin im \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot 0.5\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* (exp re) im)))
   (if (<= re -2.7e-6)
     t_0
     (if (<= re 0.00044)
       (* (sin im) (+ re 1.0))
       (if (<= re 1.9e+154)
         t_0
         (* (sin im) (+ 1.0 (* re (+ 1.0 (* re 0.5))))))))))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	double t_0 = exp(re) * im;
	double tmp;
	if (re <= -2.7e-6) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (re <= 0.00044) {
		tmp = sin(im) * (re + 1.0);
	} else if (re <= 1.9e+154) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else {
		tmp = sin(im) * (1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * 0.5))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = exp(re) * im
    if (re <= (-2.7d-6)) then
        tmp = t_0
    else if (re <= 0.00044d0) then
        tmp = sin(im) * (re + 1.0d0)
    else if (re <= 1.9d+154) then
        tmp = t_0
    else
        tmp = sin(im) * (1.0d0 + (re * (1.0d0 + (re * 0.5d0))))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	double t_0 = Math.exp(re) * im;
	double tmp;
	if (re <= -2.7e-6) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (re <= 0.00044) {
		tmp = Math.sin(im) * (re + 1.0);
	} else if (re <= 1.9e+154) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else {
		tmp = Math.sin(im) * (1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * 0.5))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	t_0 = math.exp(re) * im
	tmp = 0
	if re <= -2.7e-6:
		tmp = t_0
	elif re <= 0.00044:
		tmp = math.sin(im) * (re + 1.0)
	elif re <= 1.9e+154:
		tmp = t_0
	else:
		tmp = math.sin(im) * (1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * 0.5))))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(re, im)
	t_0 = Float64(exp(re) * im)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (re <= -2.7e-6)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (re <= 0.00044)
		tmp = Float64(sin(im) * Float64(re + 1.0));
	elseif (re <= 1.9e+154)
		tmp = t_0;
	else
		tmp = Float64(sin(im) * Float64(1.0 + Float64(re * Float64(1.0 + Float64(re * 0.5)))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(re, im)
	t_0 = exp(re) * im;
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (re <= -2.7e-6)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (re <= 0.00044)
		tmp = sin(im) * (re + 1.0);
	elseif (re <= 1.9e+154)
		tmp = t_0;
	else
		tmp = sin(im) * (1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * 0.5))));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[Exp[re], $MachinePrecision] * im), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[re, -2.7e-6], t$95$0, If[LessEqual[re, 0.00044], N[(N[Sin[im], $MachinePrecision] * N[(re + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[re, 1.9e+154], t$95$0, N[(N[Sin[im], $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.0 + N[(re * N[(1.0 + N[(re * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if re < -2.69999999999999998e-6 or 4.40000000000000016e-4 < re < 1.8999999999999999e154

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{re} \cdot \sin im \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in im around 0 91.3%

      \[\leadsto e^{re} \cdot \color{blue}{im} \]

   if -2.69999999999999998e-6 < re < 4.40000000000000016e-4

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{re} \cdot \sin im \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in re around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sin im + re \cdot \sin im} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-rgt1-in 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(re + 1\right) \cdot \sin im} \]

   5. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(re + 1\right) \cdot \sin im} \]

   if 1.8999999999999999e154 < re

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{re} \cdot \sin im \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in re around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + 0.5 \cdot re\right)\right)} \cdot \sin im \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{re \cdot 0.5}\right)\right) \cdot \sin im \]

   5. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot 0.5\right)\right)} \cdot \sin im \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 96.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;re \leq -2.7 \cdot 10^{-6}:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{re} \cdot im\\ \mathbf{elif}\;re \leq 0.00044:\\ \;\;\;\;\sin im \cdot \left(re + 1\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;re \leq 1.9 \cdot 10^{+154}:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{re} \cdot im\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\sin im \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot 0.5\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 92.7% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;re \leq -2.7 \cdot 10^{-6} \lor \neg \left(re \leq 0.0026\right):\\ \;\;\;\;e^{re} \cdot im\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\sin im \cdot \left(re + 1\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= re -2.7e-6) (not (<= re 0.0026)))
   (* (exp re) im)
   (* (sin im) (+ re 1.0))))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if ((re <= -2.7e-6) || !(re <= 0.0026)) {
		tmp = exp(re) * im;
	} else {
		tmp = sin(im) * (re + 1.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((re <= (-2.7d-6)) .or. (.not. (re <= 0.0026d0))) then
        tmp = exp(re) * im
    else
        tmp = sin(im) * (re + 1.0d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if ((re <= -2.7e-6) || !(re <= 0.0026)) {
		tmp = Math.exp(re) * im;
	} else {
		tmp = Math.sin(im) * (re + 1.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	tmp = 0
	if (re <= -2.7e-6) or not (re <= 0.0026):
		tmp = math.exp(re) * im
	else:
		tmp = math.sin(im) * (re + 1.0)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((re <= -2.7e-6) || !(re <= 0.0026))
		tmp = Float64(exp(re) * im);
	else
		tmp = Float64(sin(im) * Float64(re + 1.0));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((re <= -2.7e-6) || ~((re <= 0.0026)))
		tmp = exp(re) * im;
	else
		tmp = sin(im) * (re + 1.0);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := If[Or[LessEqual[re, -2.7e-6], N[Not[LessEqual[re, 0.0026]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[Exp[re], $MachinePrecision] * im), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[Sin[im], $MachinePrecision] * N[(re + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if re < -2.69999999999999998e-6 or 0.0025999999999999999 < re

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{re} \cdot \sin im \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in im around 0 87.0%

      \[\leadsto e^{re} \cdot \color{blue}{im} \]

   if -2.69999999999999998e-6 < re < 0.0025999999999999999

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{re} \cdot \sin im \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in re around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sin im + re \cdot \sin im} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-rgt1-in 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(re + 1\right) \cdot \sin im} \]

   5. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(re + 1\right) \cdot \sin im} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 93.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;re \leq -2.7 \cdot 10^{-6} \lor \neg \left(re \leq 0.0026\right):\\ \;\;\;\;e^{re} \cdot im\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\sin im \cdot \left(re + 1\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 64.4% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;re \leq 6.5 \cdot 10^{-8}:\\ \;\;\;\;\sin im\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;im \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + re \cdot 0.16666666666666666\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= re 6.5e-8)
   (sin im)
   (* im (+ 1.0 (* re (+ 1.0 (* re (+ 0.5 (* re 0.16666666666666666)))))))))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if (re <= 6.5e-8) {
		tmp = sin(im);
	} else {
		tmp = im * (1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * (0.5 + (re * 0.16666666666666666))))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (re <= 6.5d-8) then
        tmp = sin(im)
    else
        tmp = im * (1.0d0 + (re * (1.0d0 + (re * (0.5d0 + (re * 0.16666666666666666d0))))))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if (re <= 6.5e-8) {
		tmp = Math.sin(im);
	} else {
		tmp = im * (1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * (0.5 + (re * 0.16666666666666666))))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	tmp = 0
	if re <= 6.5e-8:
		tmp = math.sin(im)
	else:
		tmp = im * (1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * (0.5 + (re * 0.16666666666666666))))))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (re <= 6.5e-8)
		tmp = sin(im);
	else
		tmp = Float64(im * Float64(1.0 + Float64(re * Float64(1.0 + Float64(re * Float64(0.5 + Float64(re * 0.16666666666666666)))))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (re <= 6.5e-8)
		tmp = sin(im);
	else
		tmp = im * (1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * (0.5 + (re * 0.16666666666666666))))));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := If[LessEqual[re, 6.5e-8], N[Sin[im], $MachinePrecision], N[(im * N[(1.0 + N[(re * N[(1.0 + N[(re * N[(0.5 + N[(re * 0.16666666666666666), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if re < 6.49999999999999997e-8

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{re} \cdot \sin im \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in re around 0 69.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sin im} \]

   if 6.49999999999999997e-8 < re

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{re} \cdot \sin im \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in im around 0 73.5%

      \[\leadsto e^{re} \cdot \color{blue}{im} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in re around 0 56.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + 0.16666666666666666 \cdot re\right)\right)\right)} \cdot im \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 65.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + \color{blue}{re \cdot 0.16666666666666666}\right)\right)\right) \cdot \sin im \]

   6. Simplified 56.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + re \cdot 0.16666666666666666\right)\right)\right)} \cdot im \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 66.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;re \leq 6.5 \cdot 10^{-8}:\\ \;\;\;\;\sin im\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;im \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + re \cdot 0.16666666666666666\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 40.0% accurate, 13.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ im \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + re \cdot 0.16666666666666666\right)\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (* im (+ 1.0 (* re (+ 1.0 (* re (+ 0.5 (* re 0.16666666666666666))))))))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	return im * (1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * (0.5 + (re * 0.16666666666666666))))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    code = im * (1.0d0 + (re * (1.0d0 + (re * (0.5d0 + (re * 0.16666666666666666d0))))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	return im * (1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * (0.5 + (re * 0.16666666666666666))))));
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	return im * (1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * (0.5 + (re * 0.16666666666666666))))))

Julia

function code(re, im)
	return Float64(im * Float64(1.0 + Float64(re * Float64(1.0 + Float64(re * Float64(0.5 + Float64(re * 0.16666666666666666)))))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(re, im)
	tmp = im * (1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * (0.5 + (re * 0.16666666666666666))))));
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := N[(im * N[(1.0 + N[(re * N[(1.0 + N[(re * N[(0.5 + N[(re * 0.16666666666666666), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[e^{re} \cdot \sin im \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in im around 0 70.6%

   \[\leadsto e^{re} \cdot \color{blue}{im} \]

4. Taylor expanded in re around 0 42.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + 0.16666666666666666 \cdot re\right)\right)\right)} \cdot im \]
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 68.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + \color{blue}{re \cdot 0.16666666666666666}\right)\right)\right) \cdot \sin im \]

6. Simplified 42.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + re \cdot 0.16666666666666666\right)\right)\right)} \cdot im \]

7. Final simplification 42.9%

   \[\leadsto im \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + re \cdot 0.16666666666666666\right)\right)\right) \]
8. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 37.3% accurate, 18.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ im + im \cdot \left(re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot 0.5\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im) :precision binary64 (+ im (* im (* re (+ 1.0 (* re 0.5))))))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	return im + (im * (re * (1.0 + (re * 0.5))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    code = im + (im * (re * (1.0d0 + (re * 0.5d0))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	return im + (im * (re * (1.0 + (re * 0.5))));
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	return im + (im * (re * (1.0 + (re * 0.5))))

Julia

function code(re, im)
	return Float64(im + Float64(im * Float64(re * Float64(1.0 + Float64(re * 0.5)))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(re, im)
	tmp = im + (im * (re * (1.0 + (re * 0.5))));
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := N[(im + N[(im * N[(re * N[(1.0 + N[(re * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[e^{re} \cdot \sin im \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in im around 0 70.6%

   \[\leadsto e^{re} \cdot \color{blue}{im} \]

4. Taylor expanded in re around 0 38.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{im + re \cdot \left(im + 0.5 \cdot \left(im \cdot re\right)\right)} \]
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-*r* 38.5%

      \[\leadsto im + re \cdot \left(im + \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot im\right) \cdot re}\right) \]

   2. *-commutative 38.5%

      \[\leadsto im + re \cdot \left(im + \color{blue}{\left(im \cdot 0.5\right)} \cdot re\right) \]

6. Simplified 38.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{im + re \cdot \left(im + \left(im \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot re\right)} \]

7. Taylor expanded in im around 0 41.4%

   \[\leadsto im + \color{blue}{im \cdot \left(re \cdot \left(1 + 0.5 \cdot re\right)\right)} \]

8. Final simplification 41.4%

   \[\leadsto im + im \cdot \left(re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot 0.5\right)\right) \]
9. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 37.3% accurate, 18.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ im \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot 0.5\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im) :precision binary64 (* im (+ 1.0 (* re (+ 1.0 (* re 0.5))))))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	return im * (1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * 0.5))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    code = im * (1.0d0 + (re * (1.0d0 + (re * 0.5d0))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	return im * (1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * 0.5))));
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	return im * (1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * 0.5))))

Julia

function code(re, im)
	return Float64(im * Float64(1.0 + Float64(re * Float64(1.0 + Float64(re * 0.5)))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(re, im)
	tmp = im * (1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * 0.5))));
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := N[(im * N[(1.0 + N[(re * N[(1.0 + N[(re * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[e^{re} \cdot \sin im \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in im around 0 70.6%

   \[\leadsto e^{re} \cdot \color{blue}{im} \]

4. Taylor expanded in re around 0 41.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + 0.5 \cdot re\right)\right)} \cdot im \]
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 65.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{re \cdot 0.5}\right)\right) \cdot \sin im \]

6. Simplified 41.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot 0.5\right)\right)} \cdot im \]

7. Final simplification 41.4%

   \[\leadsto im \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot 0.5\right)\right) \]
8. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 37.0% accurate, 22.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ im + im \cdot \left(re \cdot \left(re \cdot 0.5\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im) :precision binary64 (+ im (* im (* re (* re 0.5)))))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	return im + (im * (re * (re * 0.5)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    code = im + (im * (re * (re * 0.5d0)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	return im + (im * (re * (re * 0.5)));
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	return im + (im * (re * (re * 0.5)))

Julia

function code(re, im)
	return Float64(im + Float64(im * Float64(re * Float64(re * 0.5))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(re, im)
	tmp = im + (im * (re * (re * 0.5)));
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := N[(im + N[(im * N[(re * N[(re * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[e^{re} \cdot \sin im \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in im around 0 70.6%

   \[\leadsto e^{re} \cdot \color{blue}{im} \]

4. Taylor expanded in re around 0 38.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{im + re \cdot \left(im + 0.5 \cdot \left(im \cdot re\right)\right)} \]
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-*r* 38.5%

      \[\leadsto im + re \cdot \left(im + \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot im\right) \cdot re}\right) \]

   2. *-commutative 38.5%

      \[\leadsto im + re \cdot \left(im + \color{blue}{\left(im \cdot 0.5\right)} \cdot re\right) \]

6. Simplified 38.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{im + re \cdot \left(im + \left(im \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot re\right)} \]

7. Taylor expanded in im around 0 41.4%

   \[\leadsto im + \color{blue}{im \cdot \left(re \cdot \left(1 + 0.5 \cdot re\right)\right)} \]

8. Taylor expanded in re around inf 41.0%

   \[\leadsto im + im \cdot \left(re \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot re\right)}\right) \]
9. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 41.0%

      \[\leadsto im + im \cdot \left(re \cdot \color{blue}{\left(re \cdot 0.5\right)}\right) \]

10. Simplified 41.0%

    \[\leadsto im + im \cdot \left(re \cdot \color{blue}{\left(re \cdot 0.5\right)}\right) \]
11. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 28.0% accurate, 25.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;im \leq 1.15 \cdot 10^{+49}:\\ \;\;\;\;im\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;re \cdot im\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im) :precision binary64 (if (<= im 1.15e+49) im (* re im)))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if (im <= 1.15e+49) {
		tmp = im;
	} else {
		tmp = re * im;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (im <= 1.15d+49) then
        tmp = im
    else
        tmp = re * im
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if (im <= 1.15e+49) {
		tmp = im;
	} else {
		tmp = re * im;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	tmp = 0
	if im <= 1.15e+49:
		tmp = im
	else:
		tmp = re * im
	return tmp

Julia

function code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (im <= 1.15e+49)
		tmp = im;
	else
		tmp = Float64(re * im);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (im <= 1.15e+49)
		tmp = im;
	else
		tmp = re * im;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := If[LessEqual[im, 1.15e+49], im, N[(re * im), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if im < 1.15000000000000001e49

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{re} \cdot \sin im \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in im around 0 79.3%

      \[\leadsto e^{re} \cdot \color{blue}{im} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in re around 0 38.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{im} \]

   if 1.15000000000000001e49 < im

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{re} \cdot \sin im \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in re around 0 49.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sin im + re \cdot \sin im} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-rgt1-in 49.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(re + 1\right) \cdot \sin im} \]

   5. Simplified 49.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(re + 1\right) \cdot \sin im} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in re around inf 3.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{re \cdot \sin im} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in im around 0 6.6%

      \[\leadsto re \cdot \color{blue}{im} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 12: 29.4% accurate, 40.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ im \cdot \left(re + 1\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im) :precision binary64 (* im (+ re 1.0)))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	return im * (re + 1.0);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    code = im * (re + 1.0d0)
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	return im * (re + 1.0);
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	return im * (re + 1.0)

Julia

function code(re, im)
	return Float64(im * Float64(re + 1.0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(re, im)
	tmp = im * (re + 1.0);
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := N[(im * N[(re + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[e^{re} \cdot \sin im \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in im around 0 70.6%

   \[\leadsto e^{re} \cdot \color{blue}{im} \]

4. Taylor expanded in re around 0 33.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + re\right)} \cdot im \]
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 33.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(re + 1\right)} \cdot im \]

6. Simplified 33.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(re + 1\right)} \cdot im \]

7. Final simplification 33.1%

   \[\leadsto im \cdot \left(re + 1\right) \]
8. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 13: 26.6% accurate, 203.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ im \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im) :precision binary64 im)

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	return im;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    code = im
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	return im;
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	return im

Julia

function code(re, im)
	return im
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(re, im)
	tmp = im;
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := im

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[e^{re} \cdot \sin im \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in im around 0 70.6%

   \[\leadsto e^{re} \cdot \color{blue}{im} \]

4. Taylor expanded in re around 0 30.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{im} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024129 
(FPCore (re im)
  :name "math.exp on complex, imaginary part"
  :precision binary64
  (* (exp re) (sin im)))