Diagrams.Solve.Polynomial:cubForm from diagrams-solve-0.1, B

Percentage Accurate: 99.8% → 99.8%

Time: 3.9s

Alternatives: 6

Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x \cdot 3\right) \cdot y - z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- (* (* x 3.0) y) z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x * 3.0) * y) - z;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = ((x * 3.0d0) * y) - z
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x * 3.0) * y) - z;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return ((x * 3.0) * y) - z

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x * 3.0) * y) - z)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = ((x * 3.0) * y) - z;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(x * 3.0), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x \cdot 3\right) \cdot y - z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- (* (* x 3.0) y) z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x * 3.0) * y) - z;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = ((x * 3.0d0) * y) - z
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x * 3.0) * y) - z;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return ((x * 3.0) * y) - z

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x * 3.0) * y) - z)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = ((x * 3.0) * y) - z;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(x * 3.0), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot \left(3 \cdot y\right) - z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- (* x (* 3.0 y)) z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * (3.0 * y)) - z;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * (3.0d0 * y)) - z
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * (3.0 * y)) - z;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * (3.0 * y)) - z

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * Float64(3.0 * y)) - z)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * (3.0 * y)) - z;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * N[(3.0 * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.8%

   \[\left(x \cdot 3\right) \cdot y - z \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-*l* 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(3 \cdot y\right)} - z \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(3 \cdot y\right) - z} \]
4. Add Preprocessing
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 69.4% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -6.4 \cdot 10^{+78} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 6 \cdot 10^{-98}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(3 \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -6.4e+78) (not (<= x 6e-98))) (* x (* 3.0 y)) (- z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -6.4e+78) || !(x <= 6e-98)) {
		tmp = x * (3.0 * y);
	} else {
		tmp = -z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-6.4d+78)) .or. (.not. (x <= 6d-98))) then
        tmp = x * (3.0d0 * y)
    else
        tmp = -z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -6.4e+78) || !(x <= 6e-98)) {
		tmp = x * (3.0 * y);
	} else {
		tmp = -z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -6.4e+78) or not (x <= 6e-98):
		tmp = x * (3.0 * y)
	else:
		tmp = -z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -6.4e+78) || !(x <= 6e-98))
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(3.0 * y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(-z);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -6.4e+78) || ~((x <= 6e-98)))
		tmp = x * (3.0 * y);
	else
		tmp = -z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -6.4e+78], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 6e-98]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[(3.0 * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], (-z)]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -6.39999999999999989e78 or 6e-98 < x

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(x \cdot 3\right) \cdot y - z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(3 \cdot y\right)} - z \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(3 \cdot y\right) - z} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 85.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(3 \cdot \frac{x \cdot y}{z} - 1\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around 0 71.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{3 \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 71.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y\right) \cdot 3} \]

      2. associate-*r* 71.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y \cdot 3\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative 71.1%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(3 \cdot y\right)} \]

   8. Simplified 71.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(3 \cdot y\right)} \]

   if -6.39999999999999989e78 < x < 6e-98

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(x \cdot 3\right) \cdot y - z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(3 \cdot y\right)} - z \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(3 \cdot y\right) - z} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 75.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot z} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 75.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]

   7. Simplified 75.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 73.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -6.4 \cdot 10^{+78} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 6 \cdot 10^{-98}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(3 \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 69.6% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -7 \cdot 10^{+78} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 2.65 \cdot 10^{-79}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;3 \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -7e+78) (not (<= x 2.65e-79))) (* 3.0 (* x y)) (- z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -7e+78) || !(x <= 2.65e-79)) {
		tmp = 3.0 * (x * y);
	} else {
		tmp = -z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-7d+78)) .or. (.not. (x <= 2.65d-79))) then
        tmp = 3.0d0 * (x * y)
    else
        tmp = -z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -7e+78) || !(x <= 2.65e-79)) {
		tmp = 3.0 * (x * y);
	} else {
		tmp = -z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -7e+78) or not (x <= 2.65e-79):
		tmp = 3.0 * (x * y)
	else:
		tmp = -z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -7e+78) || !(x <= 2.65e-79))
		tmp = Float64(3.0 * Float64(x * y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(-z);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -7e+78) || ~((x <= 2.65e-79)))
		tmp = 3.0 * (x * y);
	else
		tmp = -z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -7e+78], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 2.65e-79]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(3.0 * N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], (-z)]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -7.0000000000000003e78 or 2.6499999999999999e-79 < x

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(x \cdot 3\right) \cdot y - z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(3 \cdot y\right)} - z \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(3 \cdot y\right) - z} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 84.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(3 \cdot \frac{x \cdot y}{z} - 1\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around 0 71.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{3 \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)} \]

   if -7.0000000000000003e78 < x < 2.6499999999999999e-79

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(x \cdot 3\right) \cdot y - z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(3 \cdot y\right)} - z \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(3 \cdot y\right) - z} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 75.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot z} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 75.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]

   7. Simplified 75.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 73.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -7 \cdot 10^{+78} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 2.65 \cdot 10^{-79}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;3 \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 3 \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right) - z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- (* 3.0 (* x y)) z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (3.0 * (x * y)) - z;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (3.0d0 * (x * y)) - z
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (3.0 * (x * y)) - z;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (3.0 * (x * y)) - z

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(3.0 * Float64(x * y)) - z)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (3.0 * (x * y)) - z;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(3.0 * N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.8%

   \[\left(x \cdot 3\right) \cdot y - z \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-*l* 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(3 \cdot y\right)} - z \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(3 \cdot y\right) - z} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{3 \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)} - z \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 49.8% accurate, 3.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return -z;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = -z
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return -z;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return -z

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(-z)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = -z;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := (-z)

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.8%

   \[\left(x \cdot 3\right) \cdot y - z \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-*l* 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(3 \cdot y\right)} - z \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(3 \cdot y\right) - z} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 53.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot z} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. neg-mul-1 53.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]

7. Simplified 53.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]
8. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 2.3% accurate, 7.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 z)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = z
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return z

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return z
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = z;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := z

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.8%

   \[\left(x \cdot 3\right) \cdot y - z \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-*l* 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(3 \cdot y\right)} - z \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(3 \cdot y\right) - z} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 53.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot z} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. neg-mul-1 53.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]

7. Simplified 53.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]
8. Step-by-step derivation

   1. neg-sub0 53.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0 - z} \]

   2. sub-neg 53.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0 + \left(-z\right)} \]

   3. add-sqr-sqrt 27.0%

      \[\leadsto 0 + \color{blue}{\sqrt{-z} \cdot \sqrt{-z}} \]

   4. sqrt-unprod 17.6%

      \[\leadsto 0 + \color{blue}{\sqrt{\left(-z\right) \cdot \left(-z\right)}} \]

   5. sqr-neg 17.6%

      \[\leadsto 0 + \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot z}} \]

   6. sqrt-unprod 1.0%

      \[\leadsto 0 + \color{blue}{\sqrt{z} \cdot \sqrt{z}} \]

   7. add-sqr-sqrt 2.1%

      \[\leadsto 0 + \color{blue}{z} \]

9. Applied egg-rr 2.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0 + z} \]
10. Step-by-step derivation

    1. +-lft-identity 2.1%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]

11. Simplified 2.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]
12. Add Preprocessing

Developer Target 1: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot \left(3 \cdot y\right) - z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- (* x (* 3.0 y)) z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * (3.0 * y)) - z;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * (3.0d0 * y)) - z
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * (3.0 * y)) - z;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * (3.0 * y)) - z

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * Float64(3.0 * y)) - z)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * (3.0 * y)) - z;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * N[(3.0 * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024123 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Diagrams.Solve.Polynomial:cubForm  from diagrams-solve-0.1, B"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (! :herbie-platform default (- (* x (* 3 y)) z))

  (- (* (* x 3.0) y) z))