Graphics.Rasterific.CubicBezier:cachedBezierAt from Rasterific-0.6.1

Percentage Accurate: 92.0% → 98.4%

Time: 11.9s

Alternatives: 12

Speedup: 0.6×

• 32.4% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (+ (+ x (* y z)) (* t a)) (* (* a z) b)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x + Float64(y * z)) + Float64(t * a)) + Float64(Float64(a * z) * b))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(N[(x + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * z), $MachinePrecision] * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 92.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (+ (+ x (* y z)) (* t a)) (* (* a z) b)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x + Float64(y * z)) + Float64(t * a)) + Float64(Float64(a * z) * b))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(N[(x + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * z), $MachinePrecision] * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 98.4% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+43} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+131}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + a \cdot \left(b + \frac{t}{z}\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right) + a \cdot t\right) + \left(x + z \cdot y\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -1e+43) (not (<= z 5e+131)))
   (* z (+ y (+ (/ x z) (* a (+ b (/ t z))))))
   (+ (+ (* a (* z b)) (* a t)) (+ x (* z y)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1e+43) || !(z <= 5e+131)) {
		tmp = z * (y + ((x / z) + (a * (b + (t / z)))));
	} else {
		tmp = ((a * (z * b)) + (a * t)) + (x + (z * y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-1d+43)) .or. (.not. (z <= 5d+131))) then
        tmp = z * (y + ((x / z) + (a * (b + (t / z)))))
    else
        tmp = ((a * (z * b)) + (a * t)) + (x + (z * y))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1e+43) || !(z <= 5e+131)) {
		tmp = z * (y + ((x / z) + (a * (b + (t / z)))));
	} else {
		tmp = ((a * (z * b)) + (a * t)) + (x + (z * y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -1e+43) or not (z <= 5e+131):
		tmp = z * (y + ((x / z) + (a * (b + (t / z)))))
	else:
		tmp = ((a * (z * b)) + (a * t)) + (x + (z * y))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -1e+43) || !(z <= 5e+131))
		tmp = Float64(z * Float64(y + Float64(Float64(x / z) + Float64(a * Float64(b + Float64(t / z))))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(a * Float64(z * b)) + Float64(a * t)) + Float64(x + Float64(z * y)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -1e+43) || ~((z <= 5e+131)))
		tmp = z * (y + ((x / z) + (a * (b + (t / z)))));
	else
		tmp = ((a * (z * b)) + (a * t)) + (x + (z * y));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -1e+43], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 5e+131]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(z * N[(y + N[(N[(x / z), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * N[(b + N[(t / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(N[(a * N[(z * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x + N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -1.00000000000000001e43 or 4.99999999999999995e131 < z

   1. Initial program 75.1%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 75.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 79.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 79.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 96.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + \left(a \cdot b + \left(\frac{x}{z} + \frac{a \cdot t}{z}\right)\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 96.4%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(\left(\frac{x}{z} + \frac{a \cdot t}{z}\right) + a \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

      2. associate-+l+ 96.4%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{x}{z} + \left(\frac{a \cdot t}{z} + a \cdot b\right)\right)}\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 96.4%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b + \frac{a \cdot t}{z}\right)}\right)\right) \]

      4. associate-/l* 99.8%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + \left(a \cdot b + \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{t}{z}}\right)\right)\right) \]

      5. distribute-lft-out 99.8%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(b + \frac{t}{z}\right)}\right)\right) \]

   7. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + a \cdot \left(b + \frac{t}{z}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   if -1.00000000000000001e43 < z < 4.99999999999999995e131

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+43} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+131}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + a \cdot \left(b + \frac{t}{z}\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right) + a \cdot t\right) + \left(x + z \cdot y\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 96.3% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq 3.1 \cdot 10^{+131}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + z \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + a \cdot \left(b + \frac{t}{z}\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z 3.1e+131)
   (+ (fma y z x) (* a (+ t (* z b))))
   (* z (+ y (+ (/ x z) (* a (+ b (/ t z))))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= 3.1e+131) {
		tmp = fma(y, z, x) + (a * (t + (z * b)));
	} else {
		tmp = z * (y + ((x / z) + (a * (b + (t / z)))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= 3.1e+131)
		tmp = Float64(fma(y, z, x) + Float64(a * Float64(t + Float64(z * b))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * Float64(y + Float64(Float64(x / z) + Float64(a * Float64(b + Float64(t / z))))));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[z, 3.1e+131], N[(N[(y * z + x), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * N[(t + N[(z * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * N[(y + N[(N[(x / z), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * N[(b + N[(t / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < 3.10000000000000016e131

   1. Initial program 94.6%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 94.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative 94.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x\right)} + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      3. fma-define 94.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right)} + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      4. associate-*l* 96.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

      5. *-commutative 96.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

      6. *-commutative 96.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot z\right) \cdot a}\right) \]

      7. distribute-rgt-out 98.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right)} \]

      8. remove-double-neg 98.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-b \cdot z\right)\right)}\right) \]

      9. *-commutative 98.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \left(-\left(-\color{blue}{z \cdot b}\right)\right)\right) \]

      10. distribute-lft-neg-out 98.2%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-z\right) \cdot b}\right)\right) \]

      11. sub-neg 98.2%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t - \left(-z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      12. sub-neg 98.2%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t + \left(-\left(-z\right) \cdot b\right)\right)} \]

      13. distribute-lft-neg-in 98.2%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-z\right)\right) \cdot b}\right) \]

      14. remove-double-neg 98.2%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \color{blue}{z} \cdot b\right) \]

   3. Simplified 98.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + z \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   if 3.10000000000000016e131 < z

   1. Initial program 72.3%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 72.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 72.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 72.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 94.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + \left(a \cdot b + \left(\frac{x}{z} + \frac{a \cdot t}{z}\right)\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 94.2%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(\left(\frac{x}{z} + \frac{a \cdot t}{z}\right) + a \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

      2. associate-+l+ 94.2%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{x}{z} + \left(\frac{a \cdot t}{z} + a \cdot b\right)\right)}\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 94.2%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b + \frac{a \cdot t}{z}\right)}\right)\right) \]

      4. associate-/l* 99.8%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + \left(a \cdot b + \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{t}{z}}\right)\right)\right) \]

      5. distribute-lft-out 99.8%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(b + \frac{t}{z}\right)}\right)\right) \]

   7. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + a \cdot \left(b + \frac{t}{z}\right)\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 97.6% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \left(a \cdot t + \left(x + z \cdot y\right)\right) + b \cdot \left(z \cdot a\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_1 \leq 10^{+294}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + a \cdot \left(b + \frac{t}{z}\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ (+ (* a t) (+ x (* z y))) (* b (* z a)))))
   (if (<= t_1 1e+294) t_1 (* z (+ y (+ (/ x z) (* a (+ b (/ t z)))))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = ((a * t) + (x + (z * y))) + (b * (z * a));
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= 1e+294) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = z * (y + ((x / z) + (a * (b + (t / z)))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = ((a * t) + (x + (z * y))) + (b * (z * a))
    if (t_1 <= 1d+294) then
        tmp = t_1
    else
        tmp = z * (y + ((x / z) + (a * (b + (t / z)))))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = ((a * t) + (x + (z * y))) + (b * (z * a));
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= 1e+294) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = z * (y + ((x / z) + (a * (b + (t / z)))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	t_1 = ((a * t) + (x + (z * y))) + (b * (z * a))
	tmp = 0
	if t_1 <= 1e+294:
		tmp = t_1
	else:
		tmp = z * (y + ((x / z) + (a * (b + (t / z)))))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(Float64(a * t) + Float64(x + Float64(z * y))) + Float64(b * Float64(z * a)))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_1 <= 1e+294)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * Float64(y + Float64(Float64(x / z) + Float64(a * Float64(b + Float64(t / z))))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = ((a * t) + (x + (z * y))) + (b * (z * a));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t_1 <= 1e+294)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = z * (y + ((x / z) + (a * (b + (t / z)))));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(N[(a * t), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x + N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(b * N[(z * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$1, 1e+294], t$95$1, N[(z * N[(y + N[(N[(x / z), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * N[(b + N[(t / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (+.f64 (+.f64 (+.f64 x (*.f64 y z)) (*.f64 t a)) (*.f64 (*.f64 a z) b)) < 1.00000000000000007e294

   1. Initial program 98.5%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   if 1.00000000000000007e294 < (+.f64 (+.f64 (+.f64 x (*.f64 y z)) (*.f64 t a)) (*.f64 (*.f64 a z) b))

   1. Initial program 67.1%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 67.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 80.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 80.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 92.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + \left(a \cdot b + \left(\frac{x}{z} + \frac{a \cdot t}{z}\right)\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 92.9%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(\left(\frac{x}{z} + \frac{a \cdot t}{z}\right) + a \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

      2. associate-+l+ 92.9%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{x}{z} + \left(\frac{a \cdot t}{z} + a \cdot b\right)\right)}\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 92.9%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b + \frac{a \cdot t}{z}\right)}\right)\right) \]

      4. associate-/l* 98.2%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + \left(a \cdot b + \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{t}{z}}\right)\right)\right) \]

      5. distribute-lft-out 98.2%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(b + \frac{t}{z}\right)}\right)\right) \]

   7. Simplified 98.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + a \cdot \left(b + \frac{t}{z}\right)\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\left(a \cdot t + \left(x + z \cdot y\right)\right) + b \cdot \left(z \cdot a\right) \leq 10^{+294}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(a \cdot t + \left(x + z \cdot y\right)\right) + b \cdot \left(z \cdot a\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + a \cdot \left(b + \frac{t}{z}\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 93.6% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -7.2 \cdot 10^{-127} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 3 \cdot 10^{-77}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + a \cdot \left(b + \frac{t}{z}\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + a \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(1 + b \cdot \frac{z}{t}\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -7.2e-127) (not (<= z 3e-77)))
   (* z (+ y (+ (/ x z) (* a (+ b (/ t z))))))
   (+ x (* a (* t (+ 1.0 (* b (/ z t))))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -7.2e-127) || !(z <= 3e-77)) {
		tmp = z * (y + ((x / z) + (a * (b + (t / z)))));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (a * (t * (1.0 + (b * (z / t)))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-7.2d-127)) .or. (.not. (z <= 3d-77))) then
        tmp = z * (y + ((x / z) + (a * (b + (t / z)))))
    else
        tmp = x + (a * (t * (1.0d0 + (b * (z / t)))))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -7.2e-127) || !(z <= 3e-77)) {
		tmp = z * (y + ((x / z) + (a * (b + (t / z)))));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (a * (t * (1.0 + (b * (z / t)))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -7.2e-127) or not (z <= 3e-77):
		tmp = z * (y + ((x / z) + (a * (b + (t / z)))))
	else:
		tmp = x + (a * (t * (1.0 + (b * (z / t)))))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -7.2e-127) || !(z <= 3e-77))
		tmp = Float64(z * Float64(y + Float64(Float64(x / z) + Float64(a * Float64(b + Float64(t / z))))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(a * Float64(t * Float64(1.0 + Float64(b * Float64(z / t))))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -7.2e-127) || ~((z <= 3e-77)))
		tmp = z * (y + ((x / z) + (a * (b + (t / z)))));
	else
		tmp = x + (a * (t * (1.0 + (b * (z / t)))));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -7.2e-127], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 3e-77]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(z * N[(y + N[(N[(x / z), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * N[(b + N[(t / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(a * N[(t * N[(1.0 + N[(b * N[(z / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -7.1999999999999999e-127 or 3.00000000000000016e-77 < z

   1. Initial program 86.8%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 86.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 89.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 89.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 97.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + \left(a \cdot b + \left(\frac{x}{z} + \frac{a \cdot t}{z}\right)\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 97.4%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(\left(\frac{x}{z} + \frac{a \cdot t}{z}\right) + a \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

      2. associate-+l+ 97.4%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{x}{z} + \left(\frac{a \cdot t}{z} + a \cdot b\right)\right)}\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 97.4%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b + \frac{a \cdot t}{z}\right)}\right)\right) \]

      4. associate-/l* 98.7%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + \left(a \cdot b + \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{t}{z}}\right)\right)\right) \]

      5. distribute-lft-out 98.7%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(b + \frac{t}{z}\right)}\right)\right) \]

   7. Simplified 98.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + a \cdot \left(b + \frac{t}{z}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   if -7.1999999999999999e-127 < z < 3.00000000000000016e-77

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x\right)} + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      3. fma-define 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right)} + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      4. associate-*l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

      5. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

      6. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot z\right) \cdot a}\right) \]

      7. distribute-rgt-out 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right)} \]

      8. remove-double-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-b \cdot z\right)\right)}\right) \]

      9. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \left(-\left(-\color{blue}{z \cdot b}\right)\right)\right) \]

      10. distribute-lft-neg-out 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-z\right) \cdot b}\right)\right) \]

      11. sub-neg 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t - \left(-z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      12. sub-neg 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t + \left(-\left(-z\right) \cdot b\right)\right)} \]

      13. distribute-lft-neg-in 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-z\right)\right) \cdot b}\right) \]

      14. remove-double-neg 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \color{blue}{z} \cdot b\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + z \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 93.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} + a \cdot \left(t + z \cdot b\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around inf 93.6%

      \[\leadsto x + a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot \left(1 + \frac{b \cdot z}{t}\right)\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 93.6%

         \[\leadsto x + a \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{b \cdot \frac{z}{t}}\right)\right) \]

   8. Simplified 93.6%

      \[\leadsto x + a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot \left(1 + b \cdot \frac{z}{t}\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 96.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -7.2 \cdot 10^{-127} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 3 \cdot 10^{-77}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + a \cdot \left(b + \frac{t}{z}\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + a \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(1 + b \cdot \frac{z}{t}\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 63.0% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -6.6 \cdot 10^{+243}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq -1.2 \cdot 10^{-38} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 2.1 \cdot 10^{-64}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + a \cdot t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -6.6e+243)
   (* a (* z b))
   (if (or (<= z -1.2e-38) (not (<= z 2.1e-64))) (+ x (* z y)) (+ x (* a t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -6.6e+243) {
		tmp = a * (z * b);
	} else if ((z <= -1.2e-38) || !(z <= 2.1e-64)) {
		tmp = x + (z * y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (a * t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-6.6d+243)) then
        tmp = a * (z * b)
    else if ((z <= (-1.2d-38)) .or. (.not. (z <= 2.1d-64))) then
        tmp = x + (z * y)
    else
        tmp = x + (a * t)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -6.6e+243) {
		tmp = a * (z * b);
	} else if ((z <= -1.2e-38) || !(z <= 2.1e-64)) {
		tmp = x + (z * y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (a * t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -6.6e+243:
		tmp = a * (z * b)
	elif (z <= -1.2e-38) or not (z <= 2.1e-64):
		tmp = x + (z * y)
	else:
		tmp = x + (a * t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -6.6e+243)
		tmp = Float64(a * Float64(z * b));
	elseif ((z <= -1.2e-38) || !(z <= 2.1e-64))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(a * t));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -6.6e+243)
		tmp = a * (z * b);
	elseif ((z <= -1.2e-38) || ~((z <= 2.1e-64)))
		tmp = x + (z * y);
	else
		tmp = x + (a * t);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[z, -6.6e+243], N[(a * N[(z * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[Or[LessEqual[z, -1.2e-38], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 2.1e-64]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(a * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if z < -6.59999999999999989e243

   1. Initial program 53.1%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 53.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. add-cube-cbrt 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(\sqrt[3]{z \cdot b} \cdot \sqrt[3]{z \cdot b}\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{z \cdot b}\right)}\right) \]

      2. pow3 99.5%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt[3]{z \cdot b}\right)}^{3}}\right) \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt[3]{z \cdot b}\right)}^{3}}\right) \]

   7. Taylor expanded in z around inf 89.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 89.9%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b + y\right)} \]

   9. Simplified 89.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(a \cdot b + y\right)} \]

   10. Taylor expanded in a around inf 89.5%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)} \]

   if -6.59999999999999989e243 < z < -1.20000000000000011e-38 or 2.10000000000000011e-64 < z

   1. Initial program 87.6%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 87.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 87.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 87.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in b around 0 71.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot t + y \cdot z\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in a around 0 55.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 55.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

   8. Simplified 55.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

   if -1.20000000000000011e-38 < z < 2.10000000000000011e-64

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 81.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + a \cdot t} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 68.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -6.6 \cdot 10^{+243}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq -1.2 \cdot 10^{-38} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 2.1 \cdot 10^{-64}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + a \cdot t\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 59.4% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.35 \cdot 10^{+241}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq -4.1 \cdot 10^{+82} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+89}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + a \cdot t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -2.35e+241)
   (* a (* z b))
   (if (or (<= z -4.1e+82) (not (<= z 5e+89))) (* z y) (+ x (* a t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -2.35e+241) {
		tmp = a * (z * b);
	} else if ((z <= -4.1e+82) || !(z <= 5e+89)) {
		tmp = z * y;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (a * t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-2.35d+241)) then
        tmp = a * (z * b)
    else if ((z <= (-4.1d+82)) .or. (.not. (z <= 5d+89))) then
        tmp = z * y
    else
        tmp = x + (a * t)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -2.35e+241) {
		tmp = a * (z * b);
	} else if ((z <= -4.1e+82) || !(z <= 5e+89)) {
		tmp = z * y;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (a * t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -2.35e+241:
		tmp = a * (z * b)
	elif (z <= -4.1e+82) or not (z <= 5e+89):
		tmp = z * y
	else:
		tmp = x + (a * t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -2.35e+241)
		tmp = Float64(a * Float64(z * b));
	elseif ((z <= -4.1e+82) || !(z <= 5e+89))
		tmp = Float64(z * y);
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(a * t));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -2.35e+241)
		tmp = a * (z * b);
	elseif ((z <= -4.1e+82) || ~((z <= 5e+89)))
		tmp = z * y;
	else
		tmp = x + (a * t);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[z, -2.35e+241], N[(a * N[(z * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[Or[LessEqual[z, -4.1e+82], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 5e+89]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(a * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if z < -2.34999999999999991e241

   1. Initial program 53.1%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 53.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. add-cube-cbrt 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(\sqrt[3]{z \cdot b} \cdot \sqrt[3]{z \cdot b}\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{z \cdot b}\right)}\right) \]

      2. pow3 99.5%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt[3]{z \cdot b}\right)}^{3}}\right) \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt[3]{z \cdot b}\right)}^{3}}\right) \]

   7. Taylor expanded in z around inf 89.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 89.9%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b + y\right)} \]

   9. Simplified 89.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(a \cdot b + y\right)} \]

   10. Taylor expanded in a around inf 89.5%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)} \]

   if -2.34999999999999991e241 < z < -4.09999999999999995e82 or 4.99999999999999983e89 < z

   1. Initial program 80.3%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 80.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 79.5%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 79.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 97.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + \left(a \cdot b + \left(\frac{x}{z} + \frac{a \cdot t}{z}\right)\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 97.2%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(\left(\frac{x}{z} + \frac{a \cdot t}{z}\right) + a \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

      2. associate-+l+ 97.2%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{x}{z} + \left(\frac{a \cdot t}{z} + a \cdot b\right)\right)}\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 97.2%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b + \frac{a \cdot t}{z}\right)}\right)\right) \]

      4. associate-/l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + \left(a \cdot b + \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{t}{z}}\right)\right)\right) \]

      5. distribute-lft-out 99.9%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(b + \frac{t}{z}\right)}\right)\right) \]

   7. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + a \cdot \left(b + \frac{t}{z}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in y around inf 51.1%

      \[\leadsto z \cdot \color{blue}{y} \]

   if -4.09999999999999995e82 < z < 4.99999999999999983e89

   1. Initial program 98.8%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 98.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 98.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 98.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 68.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + a \cdot t} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 64.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.35 \cdot 10^{+241}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq -4.1 \cdot 10^{+82} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+89}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + a \cdot t\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 88.4% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -5.6 \cdot 10^{-14} \lor \neg \left(a \leq 1.2 \cdot 10^{-24}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + a \cdot \left(t + z \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(a \cdot t + z \cdot y\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= a -5.6e-14) (not (<= a 1.2e-24)))
   (+ x (* a (+ t (* z b))))
   (+ x (+ (* a t) (* z y)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((a <= -5.6e-14) || !(a <= 1.2e-24)) {
		tmp = x + (a * (t + (z * b)));
	} else {
		tmp = x + ((a * t) + (z * y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((a <= (-5.6d-14)) .or. (.not. (a <= 1.2d-24))) then
        tmp = x + (a * (t + (z * b)))
    else
        tmp = x + ((a * t) + (z * y))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((a <= -5.6e-14) || !(a <= 1.2e-24)) {
		tmp = x + (a * (t + (z * b)));
	} else {
		tmp = x + ((a * t) + (z * y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if (a <= -5.6e-14) or not (a <= 1.2e-24):
		tmp = x + (a * (t + (z * b)))
	else:
		tmp = x + ((a * t) + (z * y))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((a <= -5.6e-14) || !(a <= 1.2e-24))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(a * Float64(t + Float64(z * b))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(a * t) + Float64(z * y)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((a <= -5.6e-14) || ~((a <= 1.2e-24)))
		tmp = x + (a * (t + (z * b)));
	else
		tmp = x + ((a * t) + (z * y));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[a, -5.6e-14], N[Not[LessEqual[a, 1.2e-24]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(a * N[(t + N[(z * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(N[(a * t), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if a < -5.6000000000000001e-14 or 1.1999999999999999e-24 < a

   1. Initial program 85.3%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 85.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative 85.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x\right)} + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      3. fma-define 85.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right)} + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      4. associate-*l* 92.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

      5. *-commutative 92.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

      6. *-commutative 92.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot z\right) \cdot a}\right) \]

      7. distribute-rgt-out 96.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right)} \]

      8. remove-double-neg 96.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-b \cdot z\right)\right)}\right) \]

      9. *-commutative 96.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \left(-\left(-\color{blue}{z \cdot b}\right)\right)\right) \]

      10. distribute-lft-neg-out 96.4%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-z\right) \cdot b}\right)\right) \]

      11. sub-neg 96.4%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t - \left(-z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      12. sub-neg 96.4%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t + \left(-\left(-z\right) \cdot b\right)\right)} \]

      13. distribute-lft-neg-in 96.4%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-z\right)\right) \cdot b}\right) \]

      14. remove-double-neg 96.4%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \color{blue}{z} \cdot b\right) \]

   3. Simplified 96.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + z \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 89.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} + a \cdot \left(t + z \cdot b\right) \]

   if -5.6000000000000001e-14 < a < 1.1999999999999999e-24

   1. Initial program 99.0%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 99.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 93.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 93.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in b around 0 90.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot t + y \cdot z\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 90.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -5.6 \cdot 10^{-14} \lor \neg \left(a \leq 1.2 \cdot 10^{-24}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + a \cdot \left(t + z \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(a \cdot t + z \cdot y\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 87.7% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -7 \cdot 10^{+19} \lor \neg \left(a \leq 140000000\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + a \cdot \left(t + z \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= a -7e+19) (not (<= a 140000000.0)))
   (+ x (* a (+ t (* z b))))
   (+ x (* z (+ y (* a b))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((a <= -7e+19) || !(a <= 140000000.0)) {
		tmp = x + (a * (t + (z * b)));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (y + (a * b)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((a <= (-7d+19)) .or. (.not. (a <= 140000000.0d0))) then
        tmp = x + (a * (t + (z * b)))
    else
        tmp = x + (z * (y + (a * b)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((a <= -7e+19) || !(a <= 140000000.0)) {
		tmp = x + (a * (t + (z * b)));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (y + (a * b)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if (a <= -7e+19) or not (a <= 140000000.0):
		tmp = x + (a * (t + (z * b)))
	else:
		tmp = x + (z * (y + (a * b)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((a <= -7e+19) || !(a <= 140000000.0))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(a * Float64(t + Float64(z * b))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(y + Float64(a * b))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((a <= -7e+19) || ~((a <= 140000000.0)))
		tmp = x + (a * (t + (z * b)));
	else
		tmp = x + (z * (y + (a * b)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[a, -7e+19], N[Not[LessEqual[a, 140000000.0]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(a * N[(t + N[(z * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(z * N[(y + N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if a < -7e19 or 1.4e8 < a

   1. Initial program 83.6%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 83.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative 83.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x\right)} + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      3. fma-define 83.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right)} + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      4. associate-*l* 92.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

      5. *-commutative 92.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

      6. *-commutative 92.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot z\right) \cdot a}\right) \]

      7. distribute-rgt-out 95.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right)} \]

      8. remove-double-neg 95.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-b \cdot z\right)\right)}\right) \]

      9. *-commutative 95.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \left(-\left(-\color{blue}{z \cdot b}\right)\right)\right) \]

      10. distribute-lft-neg-out 95.9%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-z\right) \cdot b}\right)\right) \]

      11. sub-neg 95.9%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t - \left(-z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      12. sub-neg 95.9%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t + \left(-\left(-z\right) \cdot b\right)\right)} \]

      13. distribute-lft-neg-in 95.9%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-z\right)\right) \cdot b}\right) \]

      14. remove-double-neg 95.9%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \color{blue}{z} \cdot b\right) \]

   3. Simplified 95.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + z \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 90.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} + a \cdot \left(t + z \cdot b\right) \]

   if -7e19 < a < 1.4e8

   1. Initial program 99.2%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 99.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 94.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 94.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in t around 0 79.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 84.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot z} + y \cdot z\right) \]

      2. distribute-rgt-in 85.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(a \cdot b + y\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 85.2%

         \[\leadsto x + z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y + a \cdot b\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 85.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 87.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -7 \cdot 10^{+19} \lor \neg \left(a \leq 140000000\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + a \cdot \left(t + z \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 83.0% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -1.55 \cdot 10^{-33} \lor \neg \left(a \leq 3.6 \cdot 10^{-32}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + a \cdot \left(t + z \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= a -1.55e-33) (not (<= a 3.6e-32)))
   (+ x (* a (+ t (* z b))))
   (+ x (* z y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((a <= -1.55e-33) || !(a <= 3.6e-32)) {
		tmp = x + (a * (t + (z * b)));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((a <= (-1.55d-33)) .or. (.not. (a <= 3.6d-32))) then
        tmp = x + (a * (t + (z * b)))
    else
        tmp = x + (z * y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((a <= -1.55e-33) || !(a <= 3.6e-32)) {
		tmp = x + (a * (t + (z * b)));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if (a <= -1.55e-33) or not (a <= 3.6e-32):
		tmp = x + (a * (t + (z * b)))
	else:
		tmp = x + (z * y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((a <= -1.55e-33) || !(a <= 3.6e-32))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(a * Float64(t + Float64(z * b))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((a <= -1.55e-33) || ~((a <= 3.6e-32)))
		tmp = x + (a * (t + (z * b)));
	else
		tmp = x + (z * y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[a, -1.55e-33], N[Not[LessEqual[a, 3.6e-32]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(a * N[(t + N[(z * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if a < -1.54999999999999998e-33 or 3.59999999999999993e-32 < a

   1. Initial program 86.2%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 86.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative 86.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x\right)} + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      3. fma-define 86.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right)} + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      4. associate-*l* 92.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

      5. *-commutative 92.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

      6. *-commutative 92.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot z\right) \cdot a}\right) \]

      7. distribute-rgt-out 96.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right)} \]

      8. remove-double-neg 96.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-b \cdot z\right)\right)}\right) \]

      9. *-commutative 96.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \left(-\left(-\color{blue}{z \cdot b}\right)\right)\right) \]

      10. distribute-lft-neg-out 96.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-z\right) \cdot b}\right)\right) \]

      11. sub-neg 96.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t - \left(-z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      12. sub-neg 96.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t + \left(-\left(-z\right) \cdot b\right)\right)} \]

      13. distribute-lft-neg-in 96.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-z\right)\right) \cdot b}\right) \]

      14. remove-double-neg 96.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \color{blue}{z} \cdot b\right) \]

   3. Simplified 96.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + z \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 87.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} + a \cdot \left(t + z \cdot b\right) \]

   if -1.54999999999999998e-33 < a < 3.59999999999999993e-32

   1. Initial program 99.0%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 99.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 93.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 93.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in b around 0 90.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot t + y \cdot z\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in a around 0 77.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 77.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

   8. Simplified 77.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 83.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -1.55 \cdot 10^{-33} \lor \neg \left(a \leq 3.6 \cdot 10^{-32}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + a \cdot \left(t + z \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 73.9% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -8 \cdot 10^{-36} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 3.3 \cdot 10^{+14}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + a \cdot t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -8e-36) (not (<= z 3.3e+14)))
   (* z (+ y (* a b)))
   (+ x (* a t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -8e-36) || !(z <= 3.3e+14)) {
		tmp = z * (y + (a * b));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (a * t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-8d-36)) .or. (.not. (z <= 3.3d+14))) then
        tmp = z * (y + (a * b))
    else
        tmp = x + (a * t)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -8e-36) || !(z <= 3.3e+14)) {
		tmp = z * (y + (a * b));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (a * t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -8e-36) or not (z <= 3.3e+14):
		tmp = z * (y + (a * b))
	else:
		tmp = x + (a * t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -8e-36) || !(z <= 3.3e+14))
		tmp = Float64(z * Float64(y + Float64(a * b)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(a * t));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -8e-36) || ~((z <= 3.3e+14)))
		tmp = z * (y + (a * b));
	else
		tmp = x + (a * t);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -8e-36], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 3.3e+14]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(z * N[(y + N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(a * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -7.9999999999999995e-36 or 3.3e14 < z

   1. Initial program 84.0%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 84.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 87.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 87.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 74.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)} \]

   if -7.9999999999999995e-36 < z < 3.3e14

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 79.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + a \cdot t} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 76.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -8 \cdot 10^{-36} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 3.3 \cdot 10^{+14}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + a \cdot t\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 39.4% accurate, 1.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -9 \cdot 10^{+23} \lor \neg \left(t \leq 1.03 \cdot 10^{+37}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= t -9e+23) (not (<= t 1.03e+37))) (* a t) x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((t <= -9e+23) || !(t <= 1.03e+37)) {
		tmp = a * t;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((t <= (-9d+23)) .or. (.not. (t <= 1.03d+37))) then
        tmp = a * t
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((t <= -9e+23) || !(t <= 1.03e+37)) {
		tmp = a * t;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if (t <= -9e+23) or not (t <= 1.03e+37):
		tmp = a * t
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((t <= -9e+23) || !(t <= 1.03e+37))
		tmp = Float64(a * t);
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((t <= -9e+23) || ~((t <= 1.03e+37)))
		tmp = a * t;
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[t, -9e+23], N[Not[LessEqual[t, 1.03e+37]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(a * t), $MachinePrecision], x]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if t < -8.99999999999999958e23 or 1.02999999999999994e37 < t

   1. Initial program 91.1%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 91.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 90.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 90.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 83.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + \left(a \cdot b + \left(\frac{x}{z} + \frac{a \cdot t}{z}\right)\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 83.6%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(\left(\frac{x}{z} + \frac{a \cdot t}{z}\right) + a \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

      2. associate-+l+ 83.6%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{x}{z} + \left(\frac{a \cdot t}{z} + a \cdot b\right)\right)}\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 83.6%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b + \frac{a \cdot t}{z}\right)}\right)\right) \]

      4. associate-/l* 79.4%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + \left(a \cdot b + \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{t}{z}}\right)\right)\right) \]

      5. distribute-lft-out 79.4%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(b + \frac{t}{z}\right)}\right)\right) \]

   7. Simplified 79.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + a \cdot \left(b + \frac{t}{z}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in t around inf 83.6%

      \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(\frac{a}{z} + \frac{a \cdot b}{t}\right)}\right)\right) \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 83.6%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + t \cdot \left(\frac{a}{z} + \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{b}{t}}\right)\right)\right) \]

   10. Simplified 83.6%

       \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(\frac{a}{z} + a \cdot \frac{b}{t}\right)}\right)\right) \]

   11. Taylor expanded in t around inf 57.2%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t} \]

   if -8.99999999999999958e23 < t < 1.02999999999999994e37

   1. Initial program 91.8%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 91.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 95.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 95.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 43.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + a \cdot t} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around inf 37.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 46.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -9 \cdot 10^{+23} \lor \neg \left(t \leq 1.03 \cdot 10^{+37}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 12: 25.8% accurate, 15.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 91.5%

   \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-+l+ 91.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

   2. associate-*l* 93.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

3. Simplified 93.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 53.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + a \cdot t} \]

6. Taylor expanded in x around inf 24.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Developer Target 1: 97.0% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := z \cdot \left(b \cdot a + y\right) + \left(x + t \cdot a\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;z < -11820553527347888000:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z < 4.7589743188364287 \cdot 10^{-122}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(b \cdot z + t\right) \cdot a + \left(z \cdot y + x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ (* z (+ (* b a) y)) (+ x (* t a)))))
   (if (< z -11820553527347888000.0)
     t_1
     (if (< z 4.7589743188364287e-122)
       (+ (* (+ (* b z) t) a) (+ (* z y) x))
       t_1))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = (z * ((b * a) + y)) + (x + (t * a));
	double tmp;
	if (z < -11820553527347888000.0) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (z < 4.7589743188364287e-122) {
		tmp = (((b * z) + t) * a) + ((z * y) + x);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = (z * ((b * a) + y)) + (x + (t * a))
    if (z < (-11820553527347888000.0d0)) then
        tmp = t_1
    else if (z < 4.7589743188364287d-122) then
        tmp = (((b * z) + t) * a) + ((z * y) + x)
    else
        tmp = t_1
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = (z * ((b * a) + y)) + (x + (t * a));
	double tmp;
	if (z < -11820553527347888000.0) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (z < 4.7589743188364287e-122) {
		tmp = (((b * z) + t) * a) + ((z * y) + x);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	t_1 = (z * ((b * a) + y)) + (x + (t * a))
	tmp = 0
	if z < -11820553527347888000.0:
		tmp = t_1
	elif z < 4.7589743188364287e-122:
		tmp = (((b * z) + t) * a) + ((z * y) + x)
	else:
		tmp = t_1
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(z * Float64(Float64(b * a) + y)) + Float64(x + Float64(t * a)))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z < -11820553527347888000.0)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (z < 4.7589743188364287e-122)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(b * z) + t) * a) + Float64(Float64(z * y) + x));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = (z * ((b * a) + y)) + (x + (t * a));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z < -11820553527347888000.0)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (z < 4.7589743188364287e-122)
		tmp = (((b * z) + t) * a) + ((z * y) + x);
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(z * N[(N[(b * a), $MachinePrecision] + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x + N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[Less[z, -11820553527347888000.0], t$95$1, If[Less[z, 4.7589743188364287e-122], N[(N[(N[(N[(b * z), $MachinePrecision] + t), $MachinePrecision] * a), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024123 
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
  :name "Graphics.Rasterific.CubicBezier:cachedBezierAt from Rasterific-0.6.1"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (! :herbie-platform default (if (< z -11820553527347888000) (+ (* z (+ (* b a) y)) (+ x (* t a))) (if (< z 47589743188364287/1000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000) (+ (* (+ (* b z) t) a) (+ (* z y) x)) (+ (* z (+ (* b a) y)) (+ x (* t a))))))

  (+ (+ (+ x (* y z)) (* t a)) (* (* a z) b)))