a parameter of renormalized beta distribution

Percentage Accurate: 99.8% → 99.1%

Time: 8.9s

Alternatives: 8

Speedup: 1.0×

• 41.8% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

\[\left(0 < m \land 0 < v\right) \land v < 0.25\]

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (* (- (/ (* m (- 1.0 m)) v) 1.0) m))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * m;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = (((m * (1.0d0 - m)) / v) - 1.0d0) * m
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * m;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * m

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(m * Float64(1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * m)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * m;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(m * N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / v), $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * m), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (* (- (/ (* m (- 1.0 m)) v) 1.0) m))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * m;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = (((m * (1.0d0 - m)) / v) - 1.0d0) * m
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * m;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * m

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(m * Float64(1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * m)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * m;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(m * N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / v), $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * m), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.1% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 3.3 \cdot 10^{-44}:\\ \;\;\;\;m \cdot \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)\right) \cdot \frac{m}{v}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= m 3.3e-44) (* m (+ -1.0 (/ m v))) (* (* m (- 1.0 m)) (/ m v))))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 3.3e-44) {
		tmp = m * (-1.0 + (m / v));
	} else {
		tmp = (m * (1.0 - m)) * (m / v);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 3.3d-44) then
        tmp = m * ((-1.0d0) + (m / v))
    else
        tmp = (m * (1.0d0 - m)) * (m / v)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 3.3e-44) {
		tmp = m * (-1.0 + (m / v));
	} else {
		tmp = (m * (1.0 - m)) * (m / v);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 3.3e-44:
		tmp = m * (-1.0 + (m / v))
	else:
		tmp = (m * (1.0 - m)) * (m / v)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 3.3e-44)
		tmp = Float64(m * Float64(-1.0 + Float64(m / v)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(m * Float64(1.0 - m)) * Float64(m / v));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 3.3e-44)
		tmp = m * (-1.0 + (m / v));
	else
		tmp = (m * (1.0 - m)) * (m / v);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := If[LessEqual[m, 3.3e-44], N[(m * N[(-1.0 + N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(m * N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 3.30000000000000006e-44

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in m around 0 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\frac{\color{blue}{m}}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]

   if 3.30000000000000006e-44 < m

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-/l* 99.8%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.8%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + -1\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in v around 0 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{{m}^{2} \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{m}^{2} \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}} \]

      2. unpow2 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(m \cdot m\right)} \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} \]

      3. associate-*l* 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1 - m}{v} \cdot m\right)} \]

      5. associate-/r/ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1 - m}{\frac{v}{m}}} \]

      6. div-inv 99.8%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\frac{v}{m}}\right)} \]

      7. associate-/r/ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{v} \cdot m\right)}\right) \]

      8. associate-*r* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)\right) \cdot \left(\frac{1}{v} \cdot m\right)} \]

      9. associate-*l/ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1 \cdot m}{v}} \]

      10. *-un-lft-identity 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \left(m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{m}}{v} \]

   7. Applied egg-rr 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)\right) \cdot \frac{m}{v}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 3.3 \cdot 10^{-44}:\\ \;\;\;\;m \cdot \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)\right) \cdot \frac{m}{v}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 51.5% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1:\\ \;\;\;\;m \cdot \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-m\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (if (<= m 1.0) (* m (+ -1.0 (/ m v))) (- m)))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.0) {
		tmp = m * (-1.0 + (m / v));
	} else {
		tmp = -m;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 1.0d0) then
        tmp = m * ((-1.0d0) + (m / v))
    else
        tmp = -m
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.0) {
		tmp = m * (-1.0 + (m / v));
	} else {
		tmp = -m;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 1.0:
		tmp = m * (-1.0 + (m / v))
	else:
		tmp = -m
	return tmp

Julia

function code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 1.0)
		tmp = Float64(m * Float64(-1.0 + Float64(m / v)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(-m);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 1.0)
		tmp = m * (-1.0 + (m / v));
	else
		tmp = -m;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := If[LessEqual[m, 1.0], N[(m * N[(-1.0 + N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], (-m)]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 1

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in m around 0 97.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(\frac{\color{blue}{m}}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]

   if 1 < m

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-/l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + -1\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 5.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot m} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 5.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-m} \]

   7. Simplified 5.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-m} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 52.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1:\\ \;\;\;\;m \cdot \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-m\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ m \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + -1\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (* m (+ (/ (* m (- 1.0 m)) v) -1.0)))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return m * (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) + -1.0);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = m * (((m * (1.0d0 - m)) / v) + (-1.0d0))
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return m * (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) + -1.0);
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return m * (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) + -1.0)

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return Float64(m * Float64(Float64(Float64(m * Float64(1.0 - m)) / v) + -1.0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = m * (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) + -1.0);
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := N[(m * N[(N[(N[(m * N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / v), $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + -1\right) \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ m \cdot \left(\frac{1 - m}{\frac{v}{m}} + -1\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (* m (+ (/ (- 1.0 m) (/ v m)) -1.0)))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return m * (((1.0 - m) / (v / m)) + -1.0);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = m * (((1.0d0 - m) / (v / m)) + (-1.0d0))
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return m * (((1.0 - m) / (v / m)) + -1.0);
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return m * (((1.0 - m) / (v / m)) + -1.0)

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return Float64(m * Float64(Float64(Float64(1.0 - m) / Float64(v / m)) + -1.0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = m * (((1.0 - m) / (v / m)) + -1.0);
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := N[(m * N[(N[(N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision] / N[(v / m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

   2. sub-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

   3. associate-/l* 99.8%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

   4. metadata-eval 99.8%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + -1\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-*r/ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v}} + -1\right) \]

   2. *-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\frac{\color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot m}}{v} + -1\right) \]

   3. associate-*r/ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \frac{m}{v}} + -1\right) \]

   4. clear-num 99.8%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{v}{m}}} + -1\right) \]

   5. un-div-inv 99.8%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{1 - m}{\frac{v}{m}}} + -1\right) \]

6. Applied egg-rr 99.8%

   \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{1 - m}{\frac{v}{m}}} + -1\right) \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ m \cdot \left(-1 + m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (* m (+ -1.0 (* m (/ (- 1.0 m) v)))))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return m * (-1.0 + (m * ((1.0 - m) / v)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = m * ((-1.0d0) + (m * ((1.0d0 - m) / v)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return m * (-1.0 + (m * ((1.0 - m) / v)));
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return m * (-1.0 + (m * ((1.0 - m) / v)))

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return Float64(m * Float64(-1.0 + Float64(m * Float64(Float64(1.0 - m) / v))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = m * (-1.0 + (m * ((1.0 - m) / v)));
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := N[(m * N[(-1.0 + N[(m * N[(N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision] / v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

   2. sub-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

   3. associate-/l* 99.8%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

   4. metadata-eval 99.8%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + -1\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Final simplification 99.8%

   \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(-1 + m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}\right) \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 37.1% accurate, 1.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;v \leq 5.2 \cdot 10^{-116}:\\ \;\;\;\;m \cdot \frac{m}{v}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-m\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (if (<= v 5.2e-116) (* m (/ m v)) (- m)))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (v <= 5.2e-116) {
		tmp = m * (m / v);
	} else {
		tmp = -m;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (v <= 5.2d-116) then
        tmp = m * (m / v)
    else
        tmp = -m
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (v <= 5.2e-116) {
		tmp = m * (m / v);
	} else {
		tmp = -m;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	tmp = 0
	if v <= 5.2e-116:
		tmp = m * (m / v)
	else:
		tmp = -m
	return tmp

Julia

function code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (v <= 5.2e-116)
		tmp = Float64(m * Float64(m / v));
	else
		tmp = Float64(-m);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (v <= 5.2e-116)
		tmp = m * (m / v);
	else
		tmp = -m;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := If[LessEqual[v, 5.2e-116], N[(m * N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], (-m)]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if v < 5.2000000000000001e-116

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 99.8%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-/l* 99.8%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.8%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + -1\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around -inf 66.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left({m}^{3} \cdot \left(\frac{1}{v} - \frac{1}{m \cdot v}\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 66.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-{m}^{3} \cdot \left(\frac{1}{v} - \frac{1}{m \cdot v}\right)} \]

      2. distribute-rgt-neg-in 66.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{m}^{3} \cdot \left(-\left(\frac{1}{v} - \frac{1}{m \cdot v}\right)\right)} \]

      3. sub-neg 66.0%

         \[\leadsto {m}^{3} \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{v} + \left(-\frac{1}{m \cdot v}\right)\right)}\right) \]

      4. associate-/r* 66.0%

         \[\leadsto {m}^{3} \cdot \left(-\left(\frac{1}{v} + \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{m}}{v}}\right)\right)\right) \]

      5. distribute-neg-frac 66.0%

         \[\leadsto {m}^{3} \cdot \left(-\left(\frac{1}{v} + \color{blue}{\frac{-\frac{1}{m}}{v}}\right)\right) \]

      6. distribute-neg-frac 66.0%

         \[\leadsto {m}^{3} \cdot \left(-\left(\frac{1}{v} + \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{-1}{m}}}{v}\right)\right) \]

      7. metadata-eval 66.0%

         \[\leadsto {m}^{3} \cdot \left(-\left(\frac{1}{v} + \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{-1}}{m}}{v}\right)\right) \]

   7. Simplified 66.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{m}^{3} \cdot \left(-\left(\frac{1}{v} + \frac{\frac{-1}{m}}{v}\right)\right)} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in m around 0 27.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{{m}^{2}}{v}} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 27.3%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{m \cdot m}}{v} \]

      2. associate-/l* 34.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{m}{v}} \]

      3. clear-num 34.1%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{v}{m}}} \]

      4. div-inv 34.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m}{\frac{v}{m}}} \]

      5. associate-/r/ 34.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m}{v} \cdot m} \]

   10. Applied egg-rr 34.1%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m}{v} \cdot m} \]

   if 5.2000000000000001e-116 < v

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-/l* 99.8%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.8%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + -1\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 47.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot m} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 47.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-m} \]

   7. Simplified 47.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-m} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 39.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;v \leq 5.2 \cdot 10^{-116}:\\ \;\;\;\;m \cdot \frac{m}{v}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-m\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 27.0% accurate, 5.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -m \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (- m))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return -m;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = -m
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return -m;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return -m

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return Float64(-m)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = -m;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := (-m)

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

   2. sub-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

   3. associate-/l* 99.8%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

   4. metadata-eval 99.8%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + -1\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 30.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot m} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. neg-mul-1 30.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-m} \]

7. Simplified 30.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-m} \]
8. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 3.0% accurate, 11.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ m \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 m)

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return m;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = m
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return m;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return m

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return m
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = m;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := m

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

   2. sub-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

   3. associate-/l* 99.8%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

   4. metadata-eval 99.8%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + -1\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 30.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot m} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. neg-mul-1 30.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-m} \]

7. Simplified 30.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-m} \]
8. Step-by-step derivation

   1. neg-sub0 30.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0 - m} \]

   2. sub-neg 30.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0 + \left(-m\right)} \]

   3. add-sqr-sqrt 0.0%

      \[\leadsto 0 + \color{blue}{\sqrt{-m} \cdot \sqrt{-m}} \]

   4. sqrt-unprod 3.1%

      \[\leadsto 0 + \color{blue}{\sqrt{\left(-m\right) \cdot \left(-m\right)}} \]

   5. sqr-neg 3.1%

      \[\leadsto 0 + \sqrt{\color{blue}{m \cdot m}} \]

   6. sqrt-unprod 2.9%

      \[\leadsto 0 + \color{blue}{\sqrt{m} \cdot \sqrt{m}} \]

   7. add-sqr-sqrt 2.9%

      \[\leadsto 0 + \color{blue}{m} \]

9. Applied egg-rr 2.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0 + m} \]
10. Step-by-step derivation

    1. +-lft-identity 2.9%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m} \]

11. Simplified 2.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m} \]
12. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024121 
(FPCore (m v)
  :name "a parameter of renormalized beta distribution"
  :precision binary64
  :pre (and (and (< 0.0 m) (< 0.0 v)) (< v 0.25))
  (* (- (/ (* m (- 1.0 m)) v) 1.0) m))