Graphics.Rendering.Chart.Backend.Diagrams:calcFontMetrics from Chart-diagrams-1.5.1, A

Percentage Accurate: 87.5% → 99.6%
Time: 7.5s
Alternatives: 7
Speedup: 0.3×

Specification

?
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{x + y}{1 - \frac{y}{z}} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (/ (+ x y) (- 1.0 (/ y z))))
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x + y) / (1.0 - (y / z));
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x + y) / (1.0d0 - (y / z))
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x + y) / (1.0 - (y / z));
}
def code(x, y, z):
	return (x + y) / (1.0 - (y / z))
function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x + y) / Float64(1.0 - Float64(y / z)))
end
function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x + y) / (1.0 - (y / z));
end
code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] / N[(1.0 - N[(y / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\frac{x + y}{1 - \frac{y}{z}}
\end{array}

Sampling outcomes in binary64 precision:

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 7 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 87.5% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{x + y}{1 - \frac{y}{z}} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (/ (+ x y) (- 1.0 (/ y z))))
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x + y) / (1.0 - (y / z));
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x + y) / (1.0d0 - (y / z))
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x + y) / (1.0 - (y / z));
}
def code(x, y, z):
	return (x + y) / (1.0 - (y / z))
function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x + y) / Float64(1.0 - Float64(y / z)))
end
function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x + y) / (1.0 - (y / z));
end
code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] / N[(1.0 - N[(y / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\frac{x + y}{1 - \frac{y}{z}}
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 99.6% accurate, 0.3× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{x + y}{1 - \frac{y}{z}}\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_0 \leq -5 \cdot 10^{-280} \lor \neg \left(t\_0 \leq 0\right):\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{z \cdot \left(\left(-x\right) - y\right)}{y}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (/ (+ x y) (- 1.0 (/ y z)))))
   (if (or (<= t_0 -5e-280) (not (<= t_0 0.0))) t_0 (/ (* z (- (- x) y)) y))))
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = (x + y) / (1.0 - (y / z));
	double tmp;
	if ((t_0 <= -5e-280) || !(t_0 <= 0.0)) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else {
		tmp = (z * (-x - y)) / y;
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = (x + y) / (1.0d0 - (y / z))
    if ((t_0 <= (-5d-280)) .or. (.not. (t_0 <= 0.0d0))) then
        tmp = t_0
    else
        tmp = (z * (-x - y)) / y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = (x + y) / (1.0 - (y / z));
	double tmp;
	if ((t_0 <= -5e-280) || !(t_0 <= 0.0)) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else {
		tmp = (z * (-x - y)) / y;
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(x, y, z):
	t_0 = (x + y) / (1.0 - (y / z))
	tmp = 0
	if (t_0 <= -5e-280) or not (t_0 <= 0.0):
		tmp = t_0
	else:
		tmp = (z * (-x - y)) / y
	return tmp
function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(x + y) / Float64(1.0 - Float64(y / z)))
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((t_0 <= -5e-280) || !(t_0 <= 0.0))
		tmp = t_0;
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(z * Float64(Float64(-x) - y)) / y);
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = (x + y) / (1.0 - (y / z));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((t_0 <= -5e-280) || ~((t_0 <= 0.0)))
		tmp = t_0;
	else
		tmp = (z * (-x - y)) / y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] / N[(1.0 - N[(y / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[Or[LessEqual[t$95$0, -5e-280], N[Not[LessEqual[t$95$0, 0.0]], $MachinePrecision]], t$95$0, N[(N[(z * N[((-x) - y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \frac{x + y}{1 - \frac{y}{z}}\\
\mathbf{if}\;t\_0 \leq -5 \cdot 10^{-280} \lor \neg \left(t\_0 \leq 0\right):\\
\;\;\;\;t\_0\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;\frac{z \cdot \left(\left(-x\right) - y\right)}{y}\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if (/.f64 (+.f64 x y) (-.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) (/.f64 y z))) < -5.00000000000000028e-280 or 0.0 < (/.f64 (+.f64 x y) (-.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) (/.f64 y z)))

    1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\frac{x + y}{1 - \frac{y}{z}} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing

    if -5.00000000000000028e-280 < (/.f64 (+.f64 x y) (-.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) (/.f64 y z))) < 0.0

    1. Initial program 5.8%

      \[\frac{x + y}{1 - \frac{y}{z}} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \frac{z \cdot \left(x + y\right)}{y}} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-*r/99.8%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{-1 \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(x + y\right)\right)}{y}} \]
      2. *-commutative99.8%

        \[\leadsto \frac{-1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) \cdot z\right)}}{y} \]
      3. associate-*r*99.8%

        \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(x + y\right)\right) \cdot z}}{y} \]
      4. neg-mul-199.8%

        \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(-\left(x + y\right)\right)} \cdot z}{y} \]
      5. distribute-neg-in99.8%

        \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(\left(-x\right) + \left(-y\right)\right)} \cdot z}{y} \]
      6. unsub-neg99.8%

        \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(\left(-x\right) - y\right)} \cdot z}{y} \]
    5. Simplified99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\left(\left(-x\right) - y\right) \cdot z}{y}} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification99.9%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{x + y}{1 - \frac{y}{z}} \leq -5 \cdot 10^{-280} \lor \neg \left(\frac{x + y}{1 - \frac{y}{z}} \leq 0\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x + y}{1 - \frac{y}{z}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{z \cdot \left(\left(-x\right) - y\right)}{y}\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 72.7% accurate, 0.5× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+74} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1.65 \cdot 10^{+55}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\left(-z\right) - x \cdot \frac{z}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x + y\right) + y \cdot \frac{y}{z}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -5e+74) (not (<= y 1.65e+55)))
   (- (- z) (* x (/ z y)))
   (+ (+ x y) (* y (/ y z)))))
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -5e+74) || !(y <= 1.65e+55)) {
		tmp = -z - (x * (z / y));
	} else {
		tmp = (x + y) + (y * (y / z));
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-5d+74)) .or. (.not. (y <= 1.65d+55))) then
        tmp = -z - (x * (z / y))
    else
        tmp = (x + y) + (y * (y / z))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -5e+74) || !(y <= 1.65e+55)) {
		tmp = -z - (x * (z / y));
	} else {
		tmp = (x + y) + (y * (y / z));
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -5e+74) or not (y <= 1.65e+55):
		tmp = -z - (x * (z / y))
	else:
		tmp = (x + y) + (y * (y / z))
	return tmp
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -5e+74) || !(y <= 1.65e+55))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(-z) - Float64(x * Float64(z / y)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x + y) + Float64(y * Float64(y / z)));
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -5e+74) || ~((y <= 1.65e+55)))
		tmp = -z - (x * (z / y));
	else
		tmp = (x + y) + (y * (y / z));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -5e+74], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 1.65e+55]], $MachinePrecision]], N[((-z) - N[(x * N[(z / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * N[(y / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;y \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+74} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1.65 \cdot 10^{+55}\right):\\
\;\;\;\;\left(-z\right) - x \cdot \frac{z}{y}\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;\left(x + y\right) + y \cdot \frac{y}{z}\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if y < -4.99999999999999963e74 or 1.65e55 < y

    1. Initial program 66.3%

      \[\frac{x + y}{1 - \frac{y}{z}} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 54.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{x + y}{\color{blue}{-1 \cdot \frac{y}{z}}} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. neg-mul-154.0%

        \[\leadsto \frac{x + y}{\color{blue}{-\frac{y}{z}}} \]
      2. distribute-neg-frac54.0%

        \[\leadsto \frac{x + y}{\color{blue}{\frac{-y}{z}}} \]
    5. Simplified54.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{x + y}{\color{blue}{\frac{-y}{z}}} \]
    6. Taylor expanded in x around 0 80.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot z + -1 \cdot \frac{x \cdot z}{y}} \]
    7. Step-by-step derivation
      1. mul-1-neg80.3%

        \[\leadsto -1 \cdot z + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{x \cdot z}{y}\right)} \]
      2. unsub-neg80.3%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot z - \frac{x \cdot z}{y}} \]
      3. neg-mul-180.3%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)} - \frac{x \cdot z}{y} \]
      4. associate-/l*85.4%

        \[\leadsto \left(-z\right) - \color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{z}{y}} \]
    8. Simplified85.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-z\right) - x \cdot \frac{z}{y}} \]

    if -4.99999999999999963e74 < y < 1.65e55

    1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\frac{x + y}{1 - \frac{y}{z}} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 79.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(y + \frac{y \cdot \left(x + y\right)}{z}\right)} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-+r+79.3%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right) + \frac{y \cdot \left(x + y\right)}{z}} \]
      2. +-commutative79.3%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)} + \frac{y \cdot \left(x + y\right)}{z} \]
      3. associate-/l*78.9%

        \[\leadsto \left(y + x\right) + \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{x + y}{z}} \]
      4. +-commutative78.9%

        \[\leadsto \left(y + x\right) + y \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{y + x}}{z} \]
    5. Simplified78.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + x\right) + y \cdot \frac{y + x}{z}} \]
    6. Taylor expanded in y around inf 81.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(y + x\right) + y \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{y}}{z} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification83.2%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+74} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1.65 \cdot 10^{+55}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\left(-z\right) - x \cdot \frac{z}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x + y\right) + y \cdot \frac{y}{z}\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 72.7% accurate, 0.5× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -8.2 \cdot 10^{+74} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1.15 \cdot 10^{+65}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\left(-z\right) - x \cdot \frac{z}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -8.2e+74) (not (<= y 1.15e+65)))
   (- (- z) (* x (/ z y)))
   (+ x y)))
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -8.2e+74) || !(y <= 1.15e+65)) {
		tmp = -z - (x * (z / y));
	} else {
		tmp = x + y;
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-8.2d+74)) .or. (.not. (y <= 1.15d+65))) then
        tmp = -z - (x * (z / y))
    else
        tmp = x + y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -8.2e+74) || !(y <= 1.15e+65)) {
		tmp = -z - (x * (z / y));
	} else {
		tmp = x + y;
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -8.2e+74) or not (y <= 1.15e+65):
		tmp = -z - (x * (z / y))
	else:
		tmp = x + y
	return tmp
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -8.2e+74) || !(y <= 1.15e+65))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(-z) - Float64(x * Float64(z / y)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + y);
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -8.2e+74) || ~((y <= 1.15e+65)))
		tmp = -z - (x * (z / y));
	else
		tmp = x + y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -8.2e+74], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 1.15e+65]], $MachinePrecision]], N[((-z) - N[(x * N[(z / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;y \leq -8.2 \cdot 10^{+74} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1.15 \cdot 10^{+65}\right):\\
\;\;\;\;\left(-z\right) - x \cdot \frac{z}{y}\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;x + y\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if y < -8.2000000000000001e74 or 1.15e65 < y

    1. Initial program 66.3%

      \[\frac{x + y}{1 - \frac{y}{z}} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 54.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{x + y}{\color{blue}{-1 \cdot \frac{y}{z}}} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. neg-mul-154.0%

        \[\leadsto \frac{x + y}{\color{blue}{-\frac{y}{z}}} \]
      2. distribute-neg-frac54.0%

        \[\leadsto \frac{x + y}{\color{blue}{\frac{-y}{z}}} \]
    5. Simplified54.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{x + y}{\color{blue}{\frac{-y}{z}}} \]
    6. Taylor expanded in x around 0 80.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot z + -1 \cdot \frac{x \cdot z}{y}} \]
    7. Step-by-step derivation
      1. mul-1-neg80.3%

        \[\leadsto -1 \cdot z + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{x \cdot z}{y}\right)} \]
      2. unsub-neg80.3%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot z - \frac{x \cdot z}{y}} \]
      3. neg-mul-180.3%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)} - \frac{x \cdot z}{y} \]
      4. associate-/l*85.4%

        \[\leadsto \left(-z\right) - \color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{z}{y}} \]
    8. Simplified85.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-z\right) - x \cdot \frac{z}{y}} \]

    if -8.2000000000000001e74 < y < 1.15e65

    1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\frac{x + y}{1 - \frac{y}{z}} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 81.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative81.7%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]
    5. Simplified81.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification83.1%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -8.2 \cdot 10^{+74} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1.15 \cdot 10^{+65}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\left(-z\right) - x \cdot \frac{z}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 57.6% accurate, 0.5× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -4.7 \cdot 10^{+74}:\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 5.4 \cdot 10^{-117}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 6.6 \cdot 10^{+54}:\\ \;\;\;\;y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -4.7e+74) (- z) (if (<= y 5.4e-117) x (if (<= y 6.6e+54) y (- z)))))
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -4.7e+74) {
		tmp = -z;
	} else if (y <= 5.4e-117) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (y <= 6.6e+54) {
		tmp = y;
	} else {
		tmp = -z;
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= (-4.7d+74)) then
        tmp = -z
    else if (y <= 5.4d-117) then
        tmp = x
    else if (y <= 6.6d+54) then
        tmp = y
    else
        tmp = -z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -4.7e+74) {
		tmp = -z;
	} else if (y <= 5.4e-117) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (y <= 6.6e+54) {
		tmp = y;
	} else {
		tmp = -z;
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -4.7e+74:
		tmp = -z
	elif y <= 5.4e-117:
		tmp = x
	elif y <= 6.6e+54:
		tmp = y
	else:
		tmp = -z
	return tmp
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -4.7e+74)
		tmp = Float64(-z);
	elseif (y <= 5.4e-117)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (y <= 6.6e+54)
		tmp = y;
	else
		tmp = Float64(-z);
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -4.7e+74)
		tmp = -z;
	elseif (y <= 5.4e-117)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (y <= 6.6e+54)
		tmp = y;
	else
		tmp = -z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, -4.7e+74], (-z), If[LessEqual[y, 5.4e-117], x, If[LessEqual[y, 6.6e+54], y, (-z)]]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;y \leq -4.7 \cdot 10^{+74}:\\
\;\;\;\;-z\\

\mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 5.4 \cdot 10^{-117}:\\
\;\;\;\;x\\

\mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 6.6 \cdot 10^{+54}:\\
\;\;\;\;y\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;-z\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 3 regimes
  2. if y < -4.70000000000000044e74 or 6.6e54 < y

    1. Initial program 66.3%

      \[\frac{x + y}{1 - \frac{y}{z}} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 75.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot z} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. neg-mul-175.3%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]
    5. Simplified75.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]

    if -4.70000000000000044e74 < y < 5.40000000000000005e-117

    1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\frac{x + y}{1 - \frac{y}{z}} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 66.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

    if 5.40000000000000005e-117 < y < 6.6e54

    1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\frac{x + y}{1 - \frac{y}{z}} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 71.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative71.5%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]
    5. Simplified71.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]
    6. Taylor expanded in y around inf 52.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y} \]
  3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
  4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 69.3% accurate, 0.7× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -8.8 \cdot 10^{+76} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 3.9 \cdot 10^{+57}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -8.8e+76) (not (<= y 3.9e+57))) (- z) (+ x y)))
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -8.8e+76) || !(y <= 3.9e+57)) {
		tmp = -z;
	} else {
		tmp = x + y;
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-8.8d+76)) .or. (.not. (y <= 3.9d+57))) then
        tmp = -z
    else
        tmp = x + y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -8.8e+76) || !(y <= 3.9e+57)) {
		tmp = -z;
	} else {
		tmp = x + y;
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -8.8e+76) or not (y <= 3.9e+57):
		tmp = -z
	else:
		tmp = x + y
	return tmp
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -8.8e+76) || !(y <= 3.9e+57))
		tmp = Float64(-z);
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + y);
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -8.8e+76) || ~((y <= 3.9e+57)))
		tmp = -z;
	else
		tmp = x + y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -8.8e+76], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 3.9e+57]], $MachinePrecision]], (-z), N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;y \leq -8.8 \cdot 10^{+76} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 3.9 \cdot 10^{+57}\right):\\
\;\;\;\;-z\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;x + y\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if y < -8.8000000000000002e76 or 3.89999999999999968e57 < y

    1. Initial program 66.3%

      \[\frac{x + y}{1 - \frac{y}{z}} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 75.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot z} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. neg-mul-175.3%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]
    5. Simplified75.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]

    if -8.8000000000000002e76 < y < 3.89999999999999968e57

    1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\frac{x + y}{1 - \frac{y}{z}} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 81.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative81.7%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]
    5. Simplified81.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification79.3%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -8.8 \cdot 10^{+76} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 3.9 \cdot 10^{+57}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 40.3% accurate, 0.8× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.85 \cdot 10^{-162}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 6.8 \cdot 10^{-186}:\\ \;\;\;\;y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -1.85e-162) x (if (<= x 6.8e-186) y x)))
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1.85e-162) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (x <= 6.8e-186) {
		tmp = y;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-1.85d-162)) then
        tmp = x
    else if (x <= 6.8d-186) then
        tmp = y
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1.85e-162) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (x <= 6.8e-186) {
		tmp = y;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -1.85e-162:
		tmp = x
	elif x <= 6.8e-186:
		tmp = y
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -1.85e-162)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (x <= 6.8e-186)
		tmp = y;
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -1.85e-162)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (x <= 6.8e-186)
		tmp = y;
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[x, -1.85e-162], x, If[LessEqual[x, 6.8e-186], y, x]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.85 \cdot 10^{-162}:\\
\;\;\;\;x\\

\mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 6.8 \cdot 10^{-186}:\\
\;\;\;\;y\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;x\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if x < -1.8500000000000001e-162 or 6.7999999999999999e-186 < x

    1. Initial program 88.3%

      \[\frac{x + y}{1 - \frac{y}{z}} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 47.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

    if -1.8500000000000001e-162 < x < 6.7999999999999999e-186

    1. Initial program 83.7%

      \[\frac{x + y}{1 - \frac{y}{z}} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 51.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative51.0%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]
    5. Simplified51.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]
    6. Taylor expanded in y around inf 39.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 34.7% accurate, 9.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 x)
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}
def code(x, y, z):
	return x
function code(x, y, z)
	return x
end
function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x;
end
code[x_, y_, z_] := x
\begin{array}{l}

\\
x
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 87.0%

    \[\frac{x + y}{1 - \frac{y}{z}} \]
  2. Add Preprocessing
  3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 38.5%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
  4. Add Preprocessing

Developer Target 1: 93.8% accurate, 0.5× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{y + x}{-y} \cdot z\\ \mathbf{if}\;y < -3.7429310762689856 \cdot 10^{+171}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y < 3.5534662456086734 \cdot 10^{+168}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x + y}{1 - \frac{y}{z}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* (/ (+ y x) (- y)) z)))
   (if (< y -3.7429310762689856e+171)
     t_0
     (if (< y 3.5534662456086734e+168) (/ (+ x y) (- 1.0 (/ y z))) t_0))))
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = ((y + x) / -y) * z;
	double tmp;
	if (y < -3.7429310762689856e+171) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (y < 3.5534662456086734e+168) {
		tmp = (x + y) / (1.0 - (y / z));
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = ((y + x) / -y) * z
    if (y < (-3.7429310762689856d+171)) then
        tmp = t_0
    else if (y < 3.5534662456086734d+168) then
        tmp = (x + y) / (1.0d0 - (y / z))
    else
        tmp = t_0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = ((y + x) / -y) * z;
	double tmp;
	if (y < -3.7429310762689856e+171) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (y < 3.5534662456086734e+168) {
		tmp = (x + y) / (1.0 - (y / z));
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(x, y, z):
	t_0 = ((y + x) / -y) * z
	tmp = 0
	if y < -3.7429310762689856e+171:
		tmp = t_0
	elif y < 3.5534662456086734e+168:
		tmp = (x + y) / (1.0 - (y / z))
	else:
		tmp = t_0
	return tmp
function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(Float64(y + x) / Float64(-y)) * z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y < -3.7429310762689856e+171)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (y < 3.5534662456086734e+168)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x + y) / Float64(1.0 - Float64(y / z)));
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = ((y + x) / -y) * z;
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y < -3.7429310762689856e+171)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (y < 3.5534662456086734e+168)
		tmp = (x + y) / (1.0 - (y / z));
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(N[(y + x), $MachinePrecision] / (-y)), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision]}, If[Less[y, -3.7429310762689856e+171], t$95$0, If[Less[y, 3.5534662456086734e+168], N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] / N[(1.0 - N[(y / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$0]]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \frac{y + x}{-y} \cdot z\\
\mathbf{if}\;y < -3.7429310762689856 \cdot 10^{+171}:\\
\;\;\;\;t\_0\\

\mathbf{elif}\;y < 3.5534662456086734 \cdot 10^{+168}:\\
\;\;\;\;\frac{x + y}{1 - \frac{y}{z}}\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;t\_0\\


\end{array}
\end{array}

Reproduce

?
herbie shell --seed 2024119 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Graphics.Rendering.Chart.Backend.Diagrams:calcFontMetrics from Chart-diagrams-1.5.1, A"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (! :herbie-platform default (if (< y -3742931076268985600000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000) (* (/ (+ y x) (- y)) z) (if (< y 3553466245608673400000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000) (/ (+ x y) (- 1 (/ y z))) (* (/ (+ y x) (- y)) z))))

  (/ (+ x y) (- 1.0 (/ y z))))