Equirectangular approximation to distance on a great circle

Percentage Accurate: 59.8% → 99.9%

Time: 20.9s

Alternatives: 12

Speedup: 1.6×

• 31.3% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\\ R \cdot \sqrt{t\_0 \cdot t\_0 + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (/ (+ phi1 phi2) 2.0)))))
   (* R (sqrt (+ (* t_0 t_0) (* (- phi1 phi2) (- phi1 phi2)))))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0));
	return R * sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    real(8) :: t_0
    t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0d0))
    code = r * sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * Math.cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0));
	return R * Math.sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))));
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * math.cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0))
	return R * math.sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))))

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(Float64(Float64(phi1 + phi2) / 2.0)))
	return Float64(R * sqrt(Float64(Float64(t_0 * t_0) + Float64(Float64(phi1 - phi2) * Float64(phi1 - phi2)))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0));
	tmp = R * sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))));
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(N[(phi1 + phi2), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(t$95$0 * t$95$0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] * N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Initial Program: 59.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\\ R \cdot \sqrt{t\_0 \cdot t\_0 + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (/ (+ phi1 phi2) 2.0)))))
   (* R (sqrt (+ (* t_0 t_0) (* (- phi1 phi2) (- phi1 phi2)))))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0));
	return R * sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    real(8) :: t_0
    t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0d0))
    code = r * sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * Math.cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0));
	return R * Math.sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))));
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * math.cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0))
	return R * math.sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))))

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(Float64(Float64(phi1 + phi2) / 2.0)))
	return Float64(R * sqrt(Float64(Float64(t_0 * t_0) + Float64(Float64(phi1 - phi2) * Float64(phi1 - phi2)))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0));
	tmp = R * sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))));
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(N[(phi1 + phi2), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(t$95$0 * t$95$0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] * N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Alternative 1: 99.9% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right), \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right), \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \left(-\sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  R
  (hypot
   (*
    (- lambda1 lambda2)
    (fma
     (cos (* phi2 0.5))
     (cos (* 0.5 phi1))
     (* (sin (* phi2 0.5)) (- (sin (* 0.5 phi1))))))
   (- phi1 phi2))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * fma(cos((phi2 * 0.5)), cos((0.5 * phi1)), (sin((phi2 * 0.5)) * -sin((0.5 * phi1))))), (phi1 - phi2));
}

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	return Float64(R * hypot(Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * fma(cos(Float64(phi2 * 0.5)), cos(Float64(0.5 * phi1)), Float64(sin(Float64(phi2 * 0.5)) * Float64(-sin(Float64(0.5 * phi1)))))), Float64(phi1 - phi2)))
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Cos[N[(phi2 * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(0.5 * phi1), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[Sin[N[(phi2 * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * (-N[Sin[N[(0.5 * phi1), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision])), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 62.5%

   \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. hypot-define 96.7%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

3. Simplified 96.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. add-log-exp 96.6%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\log \left(e^{\cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)}\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   2. div-inv 96.6%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \log \left(e^{\cos \color{blue}{\left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot \frac{1}{2}\right)}}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   3. metadata-eval 96.6%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \log \left(e^{\cos \left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{0.5}\right)}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

6. Applied egg-rr 96.6%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\log \left(e^{\cos \left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot 0.5\right)}\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 96.6%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \log \left(e^{\cos \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)}}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   2. +-commutative 96.6%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \log \left(e^{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)}\right)}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   3. distribute-rgt-in 96.6%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \log \left(e^{\cos \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5 + \phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)}}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   4. cos-sum 99.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \log \left(e^{\color{blue}{\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) - \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)}}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

8. Applied egg-rr 99.8%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \log \left(e^{\color{blue}{\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) - \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)}}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
9. Step-by-step derivation

   1. rem-log-exp 99.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) - \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   2. cancel-sign-sub-inv 99.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) + \left(-\sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   3. fma-define 99.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right), \cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right), \left(-\sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   4. *-commutative 99.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right), \cos \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}, \left(-\sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   5. *-commutative 99.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right), \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right), \left(-\sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)\right) \cdot \sin \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

10. Applied egg-rr 99.8%

    \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right), \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right), \left(-\sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

11. Final simplification 99.8%

    \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right), \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right), \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \left(-\sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
12. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 99.9% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) - \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  R
  (hypot
   (*
    (- lambda1 lambda2)
    (-
     (* (cos (* 0.5 phi1)) (cos (* phi2 0.5)))
     (* (sin (* phi2 0.5)) (sin (* 0.5 phi1)))))
   (- phi1 phi2))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * ((cos((0.5 * phi1)) * cos((phi2 * 0.5))) - (sin((phi2 * 0.5)) * sin((0.5 * phi1))))), (phi1 - phi2));
}

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * Math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * ((Math.cos((0.5 * phi1)) * Math.cos((phi2 * 0.5))) - (Math.sin((phi2 * 0.5)) * Math.sin((0.5 * phi1))))), (phi1 - phi2));
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	return R * math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * ((math.cos((0.5 * phi1)) * math.cos((phi2 * 0.5))) - (math.sin((phi2 * 0.5)) * math.sin((0.5 * phi1))))), (phi1 - phi2))

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	return Float64(R * hypot(Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * Float64(Float64(cos(Float64(0.5 * phi1)) * cos(Float64(phi2 * 0.5))) - Float64(sin(Float64(phi2 * 0.5)) * sin(Float64(0.5 * phi1))))), Float64(phi1 - phi2)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * ((cos((0.5 * phi1)) * cos((phi2 * 0.5))) - (sin((phi2 * 0.5)) * sin((0.5 * phi1))))), (phi1 - phi2));
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[(N[Cos[N[(0.5 * phi1), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(phi2 * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[Sin[N[(phi2 * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[Sin[N[(0.5 * phi1), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 62.5%

   \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. hypot-define 96.7%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

3. Simplified 96.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. add-log-exp 96.6%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\log \left(e^{\cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)}\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   2. div-inv 96.6%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \log \left(e^{\cos \color{blue}{\left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot \frac{1}{2}\right)}}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   3. metadata-eval 96.6%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \log \left(e^{\cos \left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{0.5}\right)}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

6. Applied egg-rr 96.6%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\log \left(e^{\cos \left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot 0.5\right)}\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 96.6%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \log \left(e^{\cos \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)}}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   2. +-commutative 96.6%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \log \left(e^{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)}\right)}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   3. distribute-rgt-in 96.6%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \log \left(e^{\cos \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5 + \phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)}}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   4. cos-sum 99.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \log \left(e^{\color{blue}{\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) - \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)}}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

8. Applied egg-rr 99.8%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \log \left(e^{\color{blue}{\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) - \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)}}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

9. Taylor expanded in phi2 around inf 99.8%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) - \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
10. Step-by-step derivation

    1. *-commutative 99.8%

       \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) - \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

11. Simplified 99.8%

    \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) - \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

12. Final simplification 99.8%

    \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) - \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
13. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 93.2% accurate, 1.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_2 \leq 3.1 \cdot 10^{-38}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= phi2 3.1e-38)
   (* R (hypot (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (/ phi1 2.0))) (- phi1 phi2)))
   (* R (hypot (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (/ phi2 2.0))) (- phi1 phi2)))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi2 <= 3.1e-38) {
		tmp = R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos((phi1 / 2.0))), (phi1 - phi2));
	} else {
		tmp = R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos((phi2 / 2.0))), (phi1 - phi2));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi2 <= 3.1e-38) {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * Math.cos((phi1 / 2.0))), (phi1 - phi2));
	} else {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * Math.cos((phi2 / 2.0))), (phi1 - phi2));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if phi2 <= 3.1e-38:
		tmp = R * math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * math.cos((phi1 / 2.0))), (phi1 - phi2))
	else:
		tmp = R * math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * math.cos((phi2 / 2.0))), (phi1 - phi2))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (phi2 <= 3.1e-38)
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(Float64(phi1 / 2.0))), Float64(phi1 - phi2)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(Float64(phi2 / 2.0))), Float64(phi1 - phi2)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (phi2 <= 3.1e-38)
		tmp = R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos((phi1 / 2.0))), (phi1 - phi2));
	else
		tmp = R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos((phi2 / 2.0))), (phi1 - phi2));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[phi2, 3.1e-38], N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(phi1 / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(phi2 / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if phi2 < 3.09999999999999983e-38

   1. Initial program 64.2%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 97.3%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 97.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in phi1 around inf 94.1%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\color{blue}{\phi_1}}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   if 3.09999999999999983e-38 < phi2

   1. Initial program 57.3%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 94.7%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 94.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0 95.0%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\color{blue}{\phi_2}}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 95.9% accurate, 1.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_2 + \phi_1}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  R
  (hypot (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (/ (+ phi2 phi1) 2.0))) (- phi1 phi2))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi2 + phi1) / 2.0))), (phi1 - phi2));
}

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * Math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * Math.cos(((phi2 + phi1) / 2.0))), (phi1 - phi2));
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	return R * math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * math.cos(((phi2 + phi1) / 2.0))), (phi1 - phi2))

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	return Float64(R * hypot(Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(Float64(Float64(phi2 + phi1) / 2.0))), Float64(phi1 - phi2)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi2 + phi1) / 2.0))), (phi1 - phi2));
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(N[(phi2 + phi1), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 62.5%

   \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. hypot-define 96.7%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

3. Simplified 96.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Final simplification 96.7%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_2 + \phi_1}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 90.7% accurate, 1.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (* R (hypot (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (/ phi1 2.0))) (- phi1 phi2))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos((phi1 / 2.0))), (phi1 - phi2));
}

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * Math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * Math.cos((phi1 / 2.0))), (phi1 - phi2));
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	return R * math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * math.cos((phi1 / 2.0))), (phi1 - phi2))

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	return Float64(R * hypot(Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(Float64(phi1 / 2.0))), Float64(phi1 - phi2)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos((phi1 / 2.0))), (phi1 - phi2));
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(phi1 / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 62.5%

   \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. hypot-define 96.7%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

3. Simplified 96.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in phi1 around inf 92.9%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\color{blue}{\phi_1}}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 27.0% accurate, 2.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;\lambda_1 \leq -5.9 \cdot 10^{+277}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(t\_0 \cdot \left(-\lambda_1\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\lambda_1 \leq -4.5 \cdot 10^{+229}:\\ \;\;\;\;\lambda_1 \cdot \left(R \cdot t\_0\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\lambda_1 \leq 2.15 \cdot 10^{-81}:\\ \;\;\;\;\phi_1 \cdot \left(\frac{R \cdot \phi_2}{\phi_1} - R\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \left(R \cdot \lambda_2\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (cos (* 0.5 (+ phi2 phi1)))))
   (if (<= lambda1 -5.9e+277)
     (* R (* t_0 (- lambda1)))
     (if (<= lambda1 -4.5e+229)
       (* lambda1 (* R t_0))
       (if (<= lambda1 2.15e-81)
         (* phi1 (- (/ (* R phi2) phi1) R))
         (* (cos (* phi2 0.5)) (* R lambda2)))))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double t_0 = cos((0.5 * (phi2 + phi1)));
	double tmp;
	if (lambda1 <= -5.9e+277) {
		tmp = R * (t_0 * -lambda1);
	} else if (lambda1 <= -4.5e+229) {
		tmp = lambda1 * (R * t_0);
	} else if (lambda1 <= 2.15e-81) {
		tmp = phi1 * (((R * phi2) / phi1) - R);
	} else {
		tmp = cos((phi2 * 0.5)) * (R * lambda2);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = cos((0.5d0 * (phi2 + phi1)))
    if (lambda1 <= (-5.9d+277)) then
        tmp = r * (t_0 * -lambda1)
    else if (lambda1 <= (-4.5d+229)) then
        tmp = lambda1 * (r * t_0)
    else if (lambda1 <= 2.15d-81) then
        tmp = phi1 * (((r * phi2) / phi1) - r)
    else
        tmp = cos((phi2 * 0.5d0)) * (r * lambda2)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double t_0 = Math.cos((0.5 * (phi2 + phi1)));
	double tmp;
	if (lambda1 <= -5.9e+277) {
		tmp = R * (t_0 * -lambda1);
	} else if (lambda1 <= -4.5e+229) {
		tmp = lambda1 * (R * t_0);
	} else if (lambda1 <= 2.15e-81) {
		tmp = phi1 * (((R * phi2) / phi1) - R);
	} else {
		tmp = Math.cos((phi2 * 0.5)) * (R * lambda2);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	t_0 = math.cos((0.5 * (phi2 + phi1)))
	tmp = 0
	if lambda1 <= -5.9e+277:
		tmp = R * (t_0 * -lambda1)
	elif lambda1 <= -4.5e+229:
		tmp = lambda1 * (R * t_0)
	elif lambda1 <= 2.15e-81:
		tmp = phi1 * (((R * phi2) / phi1) - R)
	else:
		tmp = math.cos((phi2 * 0.5)) * (R * lambda2)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	t_0 = cos(Float64(0.5 * Float64(phi2 + phi1)))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (lambda1 <= -5.9e+277)
		tmp = Float64(R * Float64(t_0 * Float64(-lambda1)));
	elseif (lambda1 <= -4.5e+229)
		tmp = Float64(lambda1 * Float64(R * t_0));
	elseif (lambda1 <= 2.15e-81)
		tmp = Float64(phi1 * Float64(Float64(Float64(R * phi2) / phi1) - R));
	else
		tmp = Float64(cos(Float64(phi2 * 0.5)) * Float64(R * lambda2));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	t_0 = cos((0.5 * (phi2 + phi1)));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (lambda1 <= -5.9e+277)
		tmp = R * (t_0 * -lambda1);
	elseif (lambda1 <= -4.5e+229)
		tmp = lambda1 * (R * t_0);
	elseif (lambda1 <= 2.15e-81)
		tmp = phi1 * (((R * phi2) / phi1) - R);
	else
		tmp = cos((phi2 * 0.5)) * (R * lambda2);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[Cos[N[(0.5 * N[(phi2 + phi1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[lambda1, -5.9e+277], N[(R * N[(t$95$0 * (-lambda1)), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[lambda1, -4.5e+229], N[(lambda1 * N[(R * t$95$0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[lambda1, 2.15e-81], N[(phi1 * N[(N[(N[(R * phi2), $MachinePrecision] / phi1), $MachinePrecision] - R), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[Cos[N[(phi2 * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[(R * lambda2), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 4 regimes

2. if lambda1 < -5.89999999999999964e277

   1. Initial program 65.4%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 92.5%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 92.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in lambda1 around -inf 72.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(\lambda_1 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 72.8%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\lambda_1 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 72.8%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right) \cdot \lambda_1}\right) \]

      3. distribute-rgt-neg-in 72.8%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right) \cdot \left(-\lambda_1\right)\right)} \]

      4. +-commutative 72.8%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)}\right) \cdot \left(-\lambda_1\right)\right) \]

   7. Simplified 72.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)\right) \cdot \left(-\lambda_1\right)\right)} \]

   if -5.89999999999999964e277 < lambda1 < -4.50000000000000023e229

   1. Initial program 23.1%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 83.6%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 83.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in lambda1 around inf 64.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\lambda_1 \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \frac{R \cdot \left(\lambda_2 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)\right)}{\lambda_1} + R \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 64.0%

         \[\leadsto \lambda_1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(R \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right) + -1 \cdot \frac{R \cdot \left(\lambda_2 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)\right)}{\lambda_1}\right)} \]

      2. mul-1-neg 64.0%

         \[\leadsto \lambda_1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{R \cdot \left(\lambda_2 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)\right)}{\lambda_1}\right)}\right) \]

      3. unsub-neg 64.0%

         \[\leadsto \lambda_1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(R \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right) - \frac{R \cdot \left(\lambda_2 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)\right)}{\lambda_1}\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 64.0%

         \[\leadsto \lambda_1 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right) \cdot R} - \frac{R \cdot \left(\lambda_2 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)\right)}{\lambda_1}\right) \]

      5. +-commutative 64.0%

         \[\leadsto \lambda_1 \cdot \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)}\right) \cdot R - \frac{R \cdot \left(\lambda_2 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)\right)}{\lambda_1}\right) \]

      6. associate-/l* 64.0%

         \[\leadsto \lambda_1 \cdot \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)\right) \cdot R - \color{blue}{R \cdot \frac{\lambda_2 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)}{\lambda_1}}\right) \]

      7. associate-/l* 64.0%

         \[\leadsto \lambda_1 \cdot \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)\right) \cdot R - R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\lambda_2 \cdot \frac{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)}{\lambda_1}\right)}\right) \]

      8. +-commutative 64.0%

         \[\leadsto \lambda_1 \cdot \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)\right) \cdot R - R \cdot \left(\lambda_2 \cdot \frac{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)}\right)}{\lambda_1}\right)\right) \]

   7. Simplified 64.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\lambda_1 \cdot \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)\right) \cdot R - R \cdot \left(\lambda_2 \cdot \frac{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)\right)}{\lambda_1}\right)\right)} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in lambda1 around inf 58.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \left(\lambda_1 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)\right)} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 58.7%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \left(\lambda_1 \cdot \cos \color{blue}{\left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot 0.5\right)}\right) \]

      2. *-commutative 58.7%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \lambda_1\right)} \]

      3. associate-*l* 58.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(R \cdot \cos \left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot 0.5\right)\right) \cdot \lambda_1} \]

      4. *-commutative 58.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\lambda_1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \cos \left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot 0.5\right)\right)} \]

      5. *-commutative 58.9%

         \[\leadsto \lambda_1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot R\right)} \]

      6. *-commutative 58.9%

         \[\leadsto \lambda_1 \cdot \left(\cos \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)} \cdot R\right) \]

      7. *-rgt-identity 58.9%

         \[\leadsto \lambda_1 \cdot \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot 1}\right)\right) \cdot R\right) \]

      8. *-commutative 58.9%

         \[\leadsto \lambda_1 \cdot \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \color{blue}{1 \cdot \phi_2}\right)\right) \cdot R\right) \]

      9. metadata-eval 58.9%

         \[\leadsto \lambda_1 \cdot \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \color{blue}{\left(--1\right)} \cdot \phi_2\right)\right) \cdot R\right) \]

      10. cancel-sign-sub-inv 58.9%

          \[\leadsto \lambda_1 \cdot \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_1 - -1 \cdot \phi_2\right)}\right) \cdot R\right) \]

      11. cancel-sign-sub-inv 58.9%

          \[\leadsto \lambda_1 \cdot \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_1 + \left(--1\right) \cdot \phi_2\right)}\right) \cdot R\right) \]

      12. metadata-eval 58.9%

          \[\leadsto \lambda_1 \cdot \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \color{blue}{1} \cdot \phi_2\right)\right) \cdot R\right) \]

      13. *-commutative 58.9%

          \[\leadsto \lambda_1 \cdot \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot 1}\right)\right) \cdot R\right) \]

      14. *-rgt-identity 58.9%

          \[\leadsto \lambda_1 \cdot \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \color{blue}{\phi_2}\right)\right) \cdot R\right) \]

      15. +-commutative 58.9%

          \[\leadsto \lambda_1 \cdot \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)}\right) \cdot R\right) \]

   10. Simplified 58.9%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\lambda_1 \cdot \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)\right) \cdot R\right)} \]

   if -4.50000000000000023e229 < lambda1 < 2.15000000000000015e-81

   1. Initial program 63.7%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 98.3%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 98.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. add-log-exp 98.3%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\log \left(e^{\cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)}\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      2. div-inv 98.3%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \log \left(e^{\cos \color{blue}{\left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot \frac{1}{2}\right)}}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      3. metadata-eval 98.3%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \log \left(e^{\cos \left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{0.5}\right)}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 98.3%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\log \left(e^{\cos \left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot 0.5\right)}\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   7. Taylor expanded in phi1 around -inf 38.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(\phi_1 \cdot \left(R + -1 \cdot \frac{R \cdot \phi_2}{\phi_1}\right)\right)} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 38.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(R + -1 \cdot \frac{R \cdot \phi_2}{\phi_1}\right)} \]

      2. mul-1-neg 38.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-\phi_1\right)} \cdot \left(R + -1 \cdot \frac{R \cdot \phi_2}{\phi_1}\right) \]

      3. mul-1-neg 38.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(-\phi_1\right) \cdot \left(R + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{R \cdot \phi_2}{\phi_1}\right)}\right) \]

      4. unsub-neg 38.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(-\phi_1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(R - \frac{R \cdot \phi_2}{\phi_1}\right)} \]

      5. *-commutative 38.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(-\phi_1\right) \cdot \left(R - \frac{\color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot R}}{\phi_1}\right) \]

   9. Simplified 38.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-\phi_1\right) \cdot \left(R - \frac{\phi_2 \cdot R}{\phi_1}\right)} \]

   if 2.15000000000000015e-81 < lambda1

   1. Initial program 64.9%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 95.5%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 95.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in lambda2 around -inf 14.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \left(\lambda_2 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 14.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-R \cdot \left(\lambda_2 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 14.1%

         \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\left(\lambda_2 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)\right) \cdot R} \]

      3. *-commutative 14.1%

         \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right) \cdot \lambda_2\right)} \cdot R \]

      4. +-commutative 14.1%

         \[\leadsto -\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)}\right) \cdot \lambda_2\right) \cdot R \]

   7. Simplified 14.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)\right) \cdot \lambda_2\right) \cdot R} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. add-sqr-sqrt 9.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sqrt{-\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)\right) \cdot \lambda_2\right) \cdot R} \cdot \sqrt{-\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)\right) \cdot \lambda_2\right) \cdot R}} \]

      2. sqrt-unprod 21.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sqrt{\left(-\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)\right) \cdot \lambda_2\right) \cdot R\right) \cdot \left(-\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)\right) \cdot \lambda_2\right) \cdot R\right)}} \]

      3. sqr-neg 21.4%

         \[\leadsto \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)\right) \cdot \lambda_2\right) \cdot R\right) \cdot \left(\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)\right) \cdot \lambda_2\right) \cdot R\right)}} \]

      4. sqrt-unprod 9.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sqrt{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)\right) \cdot \lambda_2\right) \cdot R} \cdot \sqrt{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)\right) \cdot \lambda_2\right) \cdot R}} \]

      5. add-sqr-sqrt 14.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)\right) \cdot \lambda_2\right) \cdot R} \]

      6. *-commutative 14.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)\right) \cdot \lambda_2\right)} \]

      7. associate-*r* 14.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(R \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)\right)\right) \cdot \lambda_2} \]

      8. +-commutative 14.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(R \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)}\right)\right) \cdot \lambda_2 \]

      9. *-commutative 14.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(R \cdot \cos \color{blue}{\left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot 0.5\right)}\right) \cdot \lambda_2 \]

   9. Applied egg-rr 14.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(R \cdot \cos \left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot 0.5\right)\right) \cdot \lambda_2} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

       1. pow1 14.7%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\left(\left(R \cdot \cos \left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot 0.5\right)\right) \cdot \lambda_2\right)}^{1}} \]

       2. *-commutative 14.7%

          \[\leadsto {\color{blue}{\left(\lambda_2 \cdot \left(R \cdot \cos \left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot 0.5\right)\right)\right)}}^{1} \]

       3. *-commutative 14.7%

          \[\leadsto {\left(\lambda_2 \cdot \left(R \cdot \cos \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)}\right)\right)}^{1} \]

       4. +-commutative 14.7%

          \[\leadsto {\left(\lambda_2 \cdot \left(R \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)}\right)\right)\right)}^{1} \]

   11. Applied egg-rr 14.7%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\left(\lambda_2 \cdot \left(R \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)\right)\right)\right)}^{1}} \]
   12. Step-by-step derivation

       1. unpow1 14.7%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\lambda_2 \cdot \left(R \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)\right)\right)} \]

       2. associate-*r* 14.7%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\lambda_2 \cdot R\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)\right)} \]

       3. +-commutative 14.7%

          \[\leadsto \left(\lambda_2 \cdot R\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)}\right) \]

   13. Simplified 14.7%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\lambda_2 \cdot R\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)} \]

   14. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0 13.0%

       \[\leadsto \left(\lambda_2 \cdot R\right) \cdot \cos \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)} \]
3. Recombined 4 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 33.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\lambda_1 \leq -5.9 \cdot 10^{+277}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)\right) \cdot \left(-\lambda_1\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\lambda_1 \leq -4.5 \cdot 10^{+229}:\\ \;\;\;\;\lambda_1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\lambda_1 \leq 2.15 \cdot 10^{-81}:\\ \;\;\;\;\phi_1 \cdot \left(\frac{R \cdot \phi_2}{\phi_1} - R\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \left(R \cdot \lambda_2\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 33.1% accurate, 2.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\lambda_2 \leq 2.45 \cdot 10^{+191}:\\ \;\;\;\;\phi_1 \cdot \left(\frac{R \cdot \phi_2}{\phi_1} - R\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\lambda_2 \cdot \left(R \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= lambda2 2.45e+191)
   (* phi1 (- (/ (* R phi2) phi1) R))
   (* lambda2 (* R (cos (* 0.5 phi1))))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (lambda2 <= 2.45e+191) {
		tmp = phi1 * (((R * phi2) / phi1) - R);
	} else {
		tmp = lambda2 * (R * cos((0.5 * phi1)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (lambda2 <= 2.45d+191) then
        tmp = phi1 * (((r * phi2) / phi1) - r)
    else
        tmp = lambda2 * (r * cos((0.5d0 * phi1)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (lambda2 <= 2.45e+191) {
		tmp = phi1 * (((R * phi2) / phi1) - R);
	} else {
		tmp = lambda2 * (R * Math.cos((0.5 * phi1)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if lambda2 <= 2.45e+191:
		tmp = phi1 * (((R * phi2) / phi1) - R)
	else:
		tmp = lambda2 * (R * math.cos((0.5 * phi1)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (lambda2 <= 2.45e+191)
		tmp = Float64(phi1 * Float64(Float64(Float64(R * phi2) / phi1) - R));
	else
		tmp = Float64(lambda2 * Float64(R * cos(Float64(0.5 * phi1))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (lambda2 <= 2.45e+191)
		tmp = phi1 * (((R * phi2) / phi1) - R);
	else
		tmp = lambda2 * (R * cos((0.5 * phi1)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[lambda2, 2.45e+191], N[(phi1 * N[(N[(N[(R * phi2), $MachinePrecision] / phi1), $MachinePrecision] - R), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(lambda2 * N[(R * N[Cos[N[(0.5 * phi1), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if lambda2 < 2.45e191

   1. Initial program 64.6%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 97.4%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 97.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. add-log-exp 97.3%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\log \left(e^{\cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)}\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      2. div-inv 97.3%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \log \left(e^{\cos \color{blue}{\left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot \frac{1}{2}\right)}}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      3. metadata-eval 97.3%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \log \left(e^{\cos \left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{0.5}\right)}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 97.3%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\log \left(e^{\cos \left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot 0.5\right)}\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   7. Taylor expanded in phi1 around -inf 35.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(\phi_1 \cdot \left(R + -1 \cdot \frac{R \cdot \phi_2}{\phi_1}\right)\right)} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 35.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(R + -1 \cdot \frac{R \cdot \phi_2}{\phi_1}\right)} \]

      2. mul-1-neg 35.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-\phi_1\right)} \cdot \left(R + -1 \cdot \frac{R \cdot \phi_2}{\phi_1}\right) \]

      3. mul-1-neg 35.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(-\phi_1\right) \cdot \left(R + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{R \cdot \phi_2}{\phi_1}\right)}\right) \]

      4. unsub-neg 35.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(-\phi_1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(R - \frac{R \cdot \phi_2}{\phi_1}\right)} \]

      5. *-commutative 35.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(-\phi_1\right) \cdot \left(R - \frac{\color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot R}}{\phi_1}\right) \]

   9. Simplified 35.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-\phi_1\right) \cdot \left(R - \frac{\phi_2 \cdot R}{\phi_1}\right)} \]

   if 2.45e191 < lambda2

   1. Initial program 45.8%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 91.0%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 91.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in lambda2 around -inf 24.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \left(\lambda_2 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 24.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-R \cdot \left(\lambda_2 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 24.7%

         \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\left(\lambda_2 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)\right) \cdot R} \]

      3. *-commutative 24.7%

         \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right) \cdot \lambda_2\right)} \cdot R \]

      4. +-commutative 24.7%

         \[\leadsto -\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)}\right) \cdot \lambda_2\right) \cdot R \]

   7. Simplified 24.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)\right) \cdot \lambda_2\right) \cdot R} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. add-sqr-sqrt 5.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sqrt{-\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)\right) \cdot \lambda_2\right) \cdot R} \cdot \sqrt{-\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)\right) \cdot \lambda_2\right) \cdot R}} \]

      2. sqrt-unprod 30.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sqrt{\left(-\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)\right) \cdot \lambda_2\right) \cdot R\right) \cdot \left(-\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)\right) \cdot \lambda_2\right) \cdot R\right)}} \]

      3. sqr-neg 30.0%

         \[\leadsto \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)\right) \cdot \lambda_2\right) \cdot R\right) \cdot \left(\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)\right) \cdot \lambda_2\right) \cdot R\right)}} \]

      4. sqrt-unprod 28.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sqrt{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)\right) \cdot \lambda_2\right) \cdot R} \cdot \sqrt{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)\right) \cdot \lambda_2\right) \cdot R}} \]

      5. add-sqr-sqrt 57.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)\right) \cdot \lambda_2\right) \cdot R} \]

      6. *-commutative 57.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)\right) \cdot \lambda_2\right)} \]

      7. associate-*r* 57.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(R \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)\right)\right) \cdot \lambda_2} \]

      8. +-commutative 57.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(R \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)}\right)\right) \cdot \lambda_2 \]

      9. *-commutative 57.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(R \cdot \cos \color{blue}{\left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot 0.5\right)}\right) \cdot \lambda_2 \]

   9. Applied egg-rr 57.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(R \cdot \cos \left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot 0.5\right)\right) \cdot \lambda_2} \]

   10. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 60.9%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(R \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)} \cdot \lambda_2 \]
   11. Step-by-step derivation

       1. *-commutative 60.9%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot R\right)} \cdot \lambda_2 \]

   12. Simplified 60.9%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot R\right)} \cdot \lambda_2 \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 38.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\lambda_2 \leq 2.45 \cdot 10^{+191}:\\ \;\;\;\;\phi_1 \cdot \left(\frac{R \cdot \phi_2}{\phi_1} - R\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\lambda_2 \cdot \left(R \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 33.1% accurate, 2.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\lambda_2 \leq 4.9 \cdot 10^{+194}:\\ \;\;\;\;\phi_1 \cdot \left(\frac{R \cdot \phi_2}{\phi_1} - R\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(\lambda_2 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= lambda2 4.9e+194)
   (* phi1 (- (/ (* R phi2) phi1) R))
   (* R (* lambda2 (cos (* 0.5 phi1))))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (lambda2 <= 4.9e+194) {
		tmp = phi1 * (((R * phi2) / phi1) - R);
	} else {
		tmp = R * (lambda2 * cos((0.5 * phi1)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (lambda2 <= 4.9d+194) then
        tmp = phi1 * (((r * phi2) / phi1) - r)
    else
        tmp = r * (lambda2 * cos((0.5d0 * phi1)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (lambda2 <= 4.9e+194) {
		tmp = phi1 * (((R * phi2) / phi1) - R);
	} else {
		tmp = R * (lambda2 * Math.cos((0.5 * phi1)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if lambda2 <= 4.9e+194:
		tmp = phi1 * (((R * phi2) / phi1) - R)
	else:
		tmp = R * (lambda2 * math.cos((0.5 * phi1)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (lambda2 <= 4.9e+194)
		tmp = Float64(phi1 * Float64(Float64(Float64(R * phi2) / phi1) - R));
	else
		tmp = Float64(R * Float64(lambda2 * cos(Float64(0.5 * phi1))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (lambda2 <= 4.9e+194)
		tmp = phi1 * (((R * phi2) / phi1) - R);
	else
		tmp = R * (lambda2 * cos((0.5 * phi1)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[lambda2, 4.9e+194], N[(phi1 * N[(N[(N[(R * phi2), $MachinePrecision] / phi1), $MachinePrecision] - R), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(R * N[(lambda2 * N[Cos[N[(0.5 * phi1), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if lambda2 < 4.90000000000000026e194

   1. Initial program 64.6%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 97.4%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 97.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. add-log-exp 97.3%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\log \left(e^{\cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)}\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      2. div-inv 97.3%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \log \left(e^{\cos \color{blue}{\left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot \frac{1}{2}\right)}}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      3. metadata-eval 97.3%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \log \left(e^{\cos \left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{0.5}\right)}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 97.3%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\log \left(e^{\cos \left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot 0.5\right)}\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   7. Taylor expanded in phi1 around -inf 35.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(\phi_1 \cdot \left(R + -1 \cdot \frac{R \cdot \phi_2}{\phi_1}\right)\right)} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 35.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(R + -1 \cdot \frac{R \cdot \phi_2}{\phi_1}\right)} \]

      2. mul-1-neg 35.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-\phi_1\right)} \cdot \left(R + -1 \cdot \frac{R \cdot \phi_2}{\phi_1}\right) \]

      3. mul-1-neg 35.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(-\phi_1\right) \cdot \left(R + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{R \cdot \phi_2}{\phi_1}\right)}\right) \]

      4. unsub-neg 35.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(-\phi_1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(R - \frac{R \cdot \phi_2}{\phi_1}\right)} \]

      5. *-commutative 35.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(-\phi_1\right) \cdot \left(R - \frac{\color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot R}}{\phi_1}\right) \]

   9. Simplified 35.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-\phi_1\right) \cdot \left(R - \frac{\phi_2 \cdot R}{\phi_1}\right)} \]

   if 4.90000000000000026e194 < lambda2

   1. Initial program 45.8%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 91.0%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 91.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in lambda2 around -inf 24.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \left(\lambda_2 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 24.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-R \cdot \left(\lambda_2 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 24.7%

         \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\left(\lambda_2 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)\right) \cdot R} \]

      3. *-commutative 24.7%

         \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right) \cdot \lambda_2\right)} \cdot R \]

      4. +-commutative 24.7%

         \[\leadsto -\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)}\right) \cdot \lambda_2\right) \cdot R \]

   7. Simplified 24.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)\right) \cdot \lambda_2\right) \cdot R} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. add-sqr-sqrt 5.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sqrt{-\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)\right) \cdot \lambda_2\right) \cdot R} \cdot \sqrt{-\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)\right) \cdot \lambda_2\right) \cdot R}} \]

      2. sqrt-unprod 30.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sqrt{\left(-\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)\right) \cdot \lambda_2\right) \cdot R\right) \cdot \left(-\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)\right) \cdot \lambda_2\right) \cdot R\right)}} \]

      3. sqr-neg 30.0%

         \[\leadsto \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)\right) \cdot \lambda_2\right) \cdot R\right) \cdot \left(\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)\right) \cdot \lambda_2\right) \cdot R\right)}} \]

      4. sqrt-unprod 28.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sqrt{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)\right) \cdot \lambda_2\right) \cdot R} \cdot \sqrt{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)\right) \cdot \lambda_2\right) \cdot R}} \]

      5. add-sqr-sqrt 57.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)\right) \cdot \lambda_2\right) \cdot R} \]

      6. *-commutative 57.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)\right) \cdot \lambda_2\right)} \]

      7. associate-*r* 57.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(R \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)\right)\right) \cdot \lambda_2} \]

      8. +-commutative 57.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(R \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)}\right)\right) \cdot \lambda_2 \]

      9. *-commutative 57.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(R \cdot \cos \color{blue}{\left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot 0.5\right)}\right) \cdot \lambda_2 \]

   9. Applied egg-rr 57.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(R \cdot \cos \left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot 0.5\right)\right) \cdot \lambda_2} \]

   10. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 60.9%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \left(\lambda_2 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 38.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\lambda_2 \leq 4.9 \cdot 10^{+194}:\\ \;\;\;\;\phi_1 \cdot \left(\frac{R \cdot \phi_2}{\phi_1} - R\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(\lambda_2 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 31.2% accurate, 23.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_2 \leq 0.1:\\ \;\;\;\;\phi_1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \frac{\phi_2}{\phi_1} - R\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\phi_2 \cdot \left(R - R \cdot \frac{\phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= phi2 0.1)
   (* phi1 (- (* R (/ phi2 phi1)) R))
   (* phi2 (- R (* R (/ phi1 phi2))))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi2 <= 0.1) {
		tmp = phi1 * ((R * (phi2 / phi1)) - R);
	} else {
		tmp = phi2 * (R - (R * (phi1 / phi2)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (phi2 <= 0.1d0) then
        tmp = phi1 * ((r * (phi2 / phi1)) - r)
    else
        tmp = phi2 * (r - (r * (phi1 / phi2)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi2 <= 0.1) {
		tmp = phi1 * ((R * (phi2 / phi1)) - R);
	} else {
		tmp = phi2 * (R - (R * (phi1 / phi2)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if phi2 <= 0.1:
		tmp = phi1 * ((R * (phi2 / phi1)) - R)
	else:
		tmp = phi2 * (R - (R * (phi1 / phi2)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (phi2 <= 0.1)
		tmp = Float64(phi1 * Float64(Float64(R * Float64(phi2 / phi1)) - R));
	else
		tmp = Float64(phi2 * Float64(R - Float64(R * Float64(phi1 / phi2))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (phi2 <= 0.1)
		tmp = phi1 * ((R * (phi2 / phi1)) - R);
	else
		tmp = phi2 * (R - (R * (phi1 / phi2)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[phi2, 0.1], N[(phi1 * N[(N[(R * N[(phi2 / phi1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - R), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(phi2 * N[(R - N[(R * N[(phi1 / phi2), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if phi2 < 0.10000000000000001

   1. Initial program 64.0%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 97.4%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 97.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in phi1 around -inf 23.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(\phi_1 \cdot \left(R + -1 \cdot \frac{R \cdot \phi_2}{\phi_1}\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 23.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(R + -1 \cdot \frac{R \cdot \phi_2}{\phi_1}\right)} \]

      2. mul-1-neg 23.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-\phi_1\right)} \cdot \left(R + -1 \cdot \frac{R \cdot \phi_2}{\phi_1}\right) \]

      3. mul-1-neg 23.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(-\phi_1\right) \cdot \left(R + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{R \cdot \phi_2}{\phi_1}\right)}\right) \]

      4. unsub-neg 23.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(-\phi_1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(R - \frac{R \cdot \phi_2}{\phi_1}\right)} \]

      5. associate-/l* 24.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(-\phi_1\right) \cdot \left(R - \color{blue}{R \cdot \frac{\phi_2}{\phi_1}}\right) \]

   7. Simplified 24.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-\phi_1\right) \cdot \left(R - R \cdot \frac{\phi_2}{\phi_1}\right)} \]

   if 0.10000000000000001 < phi2

   1. Initial program 57.2%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 94.0%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 94.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in phi2 around inf 66.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot \left(R + -1 \cdot \frac{R \cdot \phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 66.7%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \left(R + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{R \cdot \phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)}\right) \]

      2. unsub-neg 66.7%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(R - \frac{R \cdot \phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)} \]

      3. associate-/l* 68.5%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \left(R - \color{blue}{R \cdot \frac{\phi_1}{\phi_2}}\right) \]

   7. Simplified 68.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot \left(R - R \cdot \frac{\phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 34.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_2 \leq 0.1:\\ \;\;\;\;\phi_1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \frac{\phi_2}{\phi_1} - R\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\phi_2 \cdot \left(R - R \cdot \frac{\phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 30.8% accurate, 23.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_1 \leq -4.6 \cdot 10^{+128}:\\ \;\;\;\;\phi_1 \cdot \left(-R\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\phi_2 \cdot \left(R - R \cdot \frac{\phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= phi1 -4.6e+128) (* phi1 (- R)) (* phi2 (- R (* R (/ phi1 phi2))))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi1 <= -4.6e+128) {
		tmp = phi1 * -R;
	} else {
		tmp = phi2 * (R - (R * (phi1 / phi2)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (phi1 <= (-4.6d+128)) then
        tmp = phi1 * -r
    else
        tmp = phi2 * (r - (r * (phi1 / phi2)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi1 <= -4.6e+128) {
		tmp = phi1 * -R;
	} else {
		tmp = phi2 * (R - (R * (phi1 / phi2)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if phi1 <= -4.6e+128:
		tmp = phi1 * -R
	else:
		tmp = phi2 * (R - (R * (phi1 / phi2)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (phi1 <= -4.6e+128)
		tmp = Float64(phi1 * Float64(-R));
	else
		tmp = Float64(phi2 * Float64(R - Float64(R * Float64(phi1 / phi2))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (phi1 <= -4.6e+128)
		tmp = phi1 * -R;
	else
		tmp = phi2 * (R - (R * (phi1 / phi2)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[phi1, -4.6e+128], N[(phi1 * (-R)), $MachinePrecision], N[(phi2 * N[(R - N[(R * N[(phi1 / phi2), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if phi1 < -4.59999999999999996e128

   1. Initial program 51.1%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 98.1%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 98.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in phi1 around -inf 84.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \phi_1\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 84.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-R \cdot \phi_1} \]

      2. *-commutative 84.4%

         \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot R} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-neg-in 84.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot \left(-R\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 84.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot \left(-R\right)} \]

   if -4.59999999999999996e128 < phi1

   1. Initial program 65.0%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 96.4%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 96.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in phi2 around inf 23.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot \left(R + -1 \cdot \frac{R \cdot \phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 23.0%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \left(R + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{R \cdot \phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)}\right) \]

      2. unsub-neg 23.0%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(R - \frac{R \cdot \phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)} \]

      3. associate-/l* 23.0%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \left(R - \color{blue}{R \cdot \frac{\phi_1}{\phi_2}}\right) \]

   7. Simplified 23.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot \left(R - R \cdot \frac{\phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 29.9% accurate, 36.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_2 \leq 17000000000:\\ \;\;\;\;\phi_1 \cdot \left(-R\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \phi_2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= phi2 17000000000.0) (* phi1 (- R)) (* R phi2)))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi2 <= 17000000000.0) {
		tmp = phi1 * -R;
	} else {
		tmp = R * phi2;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (phi2 <= 17000000000.0d0) then
        tmp = phi1 * -r
    else
        tmp = r * phi2
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi2 <= 17000000000.0) {
		tmp = phi1 * -R;
	} else {
		tmp = R * phi2;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if phi2 <= 17000000000.0:
		tmp = phi1 * -R
	else:
		tmp = R * phi2
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (phi2 <= 17000000000.0)
		tmp = Float64(phi1 * Float64(-R));
	else
		tmp = Float64(R * phi2);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (phi2 <= 17000000000.0)
		tmp = phi1 * -R;
	else
		tmp = R * phi2;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[phi2, 17000000000.0], N[(phi1 * (-R)), $MachinePrecision], N[(R * phi2), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if phi2 < 1.7e10

   1. Initial program 64.2%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 97.4%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 97.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in phi1 around -inf 25.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \phi_1\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 25.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-R \cdot \phi_1} \]

      2. *-commutative 25.2%

         \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot R} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-neg-in 25.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot \left(-R\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 25.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot \left(-R\right)} \]

   if 1.7e10 < phi2

   1. Initial program 56.4%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 93.9%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 93.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in phi2 around inf 67.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \phi_2} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 67.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot R} \]

   7. Simplified 67.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot R} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 34.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_2 \leq 17000000000:\\ \;\;\;\;\phi_1 \cdot \left(-R\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \phi_2\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 12: 18.2% accurate, 109.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ R \cdot \phi_2 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2) :precision binary64 (* R phi2))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * phi2;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    code = r * phi2
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * phi2;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	return R * phi2

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	return Float64(R * phi2)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = R * phi2;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := N[(R * phi2), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 62.5%

   \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. hypot-define 96.7%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

3. Simplified 96.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in phi2 around inf 17.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \phi_2} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 17.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot R} \]

7. Simplified 17.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot R} \]

8. Final simplification 17.0%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \phi_2 \]
9. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024118 
(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
  :name "Equirectangular approximation to distance on a great circle"
  :precision binary64
  (* R (sqrt (+ (* (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (/ (+ phi1 phi2) 2.0))) (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (/ (+ phi1 phi2) 2.0)))) (* (- phi1 phi2) (- phi1 phi2))))))