Falkner and Boettcher, Appendix A

Percentage Accurate: 90.1% → 97.8%

Time: 11.4s

Alternatives: 14

Speedup: 1.0×

• 22.0% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

• could not determine a ground truth

  1. a = -1.9999999999999999e-154
  2. k = 0.0
  3. m = -2.00000000000000007e154

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m)
 :precision binary64
 (/ (* a (pow k m)) (+ (+ 1.0 (* 10.0 k)) (* k k))))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	return (a * pow(k, m)) / ((1.0 + (10.0 * k)) + (k * k));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    code = (a * (k ** m)) / ((1.0d0 + (10.0d0 * k)) + (k * k))
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	return (a * Math.pow(k, m)) / ((1.0 + (10.0 * k)) + (k * k));
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	return (a * math.pow(k, m)) / ((1.0 + (10.0 * k)) + (k * k))

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	return Float64(Float64(a * (k ^ m)) / Float64(Float64(1.0 + Float64(10.0 * k)) + Float64(k * k)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, k, m)
	tmp = (a * (k ^ m)) / ((1.0 + (10.0 * k)) + (k * k));
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := N[(N[(a * N[Power[k, m], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(1.0 + N[(10.0 * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(k * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 90.1% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m)
 :precision binary64
 (/ (* a (pow k m)) (+ (+ 1.0 (* 10.0 k)) (* k k))))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	return (a * pow(k, m)) / ((1.0 + (10.0 * k)) + (k * k));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    code = (a * (k ** m)) / ((1.0d0 + (10.0d0 * k)) + (k * k))
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	return (a * Math.pow(k, m)) / ((1.0 + (10.0 * k)) + (k * k));
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	return (a * math.pow(k, m)) / ((1.0 + (10.0 * k)) + (k * k))

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	return Float64(Float64(a * (k ^ m)) / Float64(Float64(1.0 + Float64(10.0 * k)) + Float64(k * k)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, k, m)
	tmp = (a * (k ^ m)) / ((1.0 + (10.0 * k)) + (k * k));
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := N[(N[(a * N[Power[k, m], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(1.0 + N[(10.0 * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(k * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 97.8% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := a \cdot {k}^{m}\\ \mathbf{if}\;\frac{t\_0}{\left(1 + k \cdot 10\right) + k \cdot k} \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{t\_0}{1 + k \cdot \left(k + 10\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a + a \cdot \left(k \cdot \left(k \cdot 99 - 10\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* a (pow k m))))
   (if (<= (/ t_0 (+ (+ 1.0 (* k 10.0)) (* k k))) INFINITY)
     (/ t_0 (+ 1.0 (* k (+ k 10.0))))
     (+ a (* a (* k (- (* k 99.0) 10.0)))))))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double t_0 = a * pow(k, m);
	double tmp;
	if ((t_0 / ((1.0 + (k * 10.0)) + (k * k))) <= ((double) INFINITY)) {
		tmp = t_0 / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0)));
	} else {
		tmp = a + (a * (k * ((k * 99.0) - 10.0)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double t_0 = a * Math.pow(k, m);
	double tmp;
	if ((t_0 / ((1.0 + (k * 10.0)) + (k * k))) <= Double.POSITIVE_INFINITY) {
		tmp = t_0 / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0)));
	} else {
		tmp = a + (a * (k * ((k * 99.0) - 10.0)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	t_0 = a * math.pow(k, m)
	tmp = 0
	if (t_0 / ((1.0 + (k * 10.0)) + (k * k))) <= math.inf:
		tmp = t_0 / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0)))
	else:
		tmp = a + (a * (k * ((k * 99.0) - 10.0)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	t_0 = Float64(a * (k ^ m))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(t_0 / Float64(Float64(1.0 + Float64(k * 10.0)) + Float64(k * k))) <= Inf)
		tmp = Float64(t_0 / Float64(1.0 + Float64(k * Float64(k + 10.0))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(a + Float64(a * Float64(k * Float64(Float64(k * 99.0) - 10.0))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(a, k, m)
	t_0 = a * (k ^ m);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((t_0 / ((1.0 + (k * 10.0)) + (k * k))) <= Inf)
		tmp = t_0 / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0)));
	else
		tmp = a + (a * (k * ((k * 99.0) - 10.0)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(a * N[Power[k, m], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(t$95$0 / N[(N[(1.0 + N[(k * 10.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(k * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], Infinity], N[(t$95$0 / N[(1.0 + N[(k * N[(k + 10.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(a + N[(a * N[(k * N[(N[(k * 99.0), $MachinePrecision] - 10.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (/.f64 (*.f64 a (pow.f64 k m)) (+.f64 (+.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) (*.f64 #s(literal 10 binary64) k)) (*.f64 k k))) < +inf.0

   1. Initial program 99.3%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 99.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 99.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 99.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 99.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 99.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 99.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 99.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 99.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 99.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 99.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around 0 99.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   if +inf.0 < (/.f64 (*.f64 a (pow.f64 k m)) (+.f64 (+.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) (*.f64 #s(literal 10 binary64) k)) (*.f64 k k)))

   1. Initial program 0.0%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 0.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 0.0%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 0.0%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 0.0%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 0.0%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 0.0%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 0.0%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 0.0%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 0.0%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 0.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 1.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in k around 0 74.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + k \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(k \cdot \left(a + -100 \cdot a\right)\right) - 10 \cdot a\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. cancel-sign-sub-inv 74.2%

         \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(k \cdot \left(a + -100 \cdot a\right)\right) + \left(-10\right) \cdot a\right)} \]

      2. metadata-eval 74.2%

         \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(k \cdot \left(a + -100 \cdot a\right)\right) + \color{blue}{-10} \cdot a\right) \]

      3. associate-*r* 74.2%

         \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot k\right) \cdot \left(a + -100 \cdot a\right)} + -10 \cdot a\right) \]

      4. neg-mul-1 74.2%

         \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(-k\right)} \cdot \left(a + -100 \cdot a\right) + -10 \cdot a\right) \]

      5. distribute-rgt1-in 74.2%

         \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \left(\left(-k\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(-100 + 1\right) \cdot a\right)} + -10 \cdot a\right) \]

      6. metadata-eval 74.2%

         \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \left(\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{-99} \cdot a\right) + -10 \cdot a\right) \]

      7. *-commutative 74.2%

         \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \left(\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-99 \cdot a\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot -10}\right) \]

   8. Simplified 74.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + k \cdot \left(\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-99 \cdot a\right) + a \cdot -10\right)} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in a around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(k \cdot \left(99 \cdot k - 10\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + k \cdot 10\right) + k \cdot k} \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(k + 10\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a + a \cdot \left(k \cdot \left(k \cdot 99 - 10\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 97.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 3.5:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(k + 10\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot {k}^{m}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= m 3.5) (* a (/ (pow k m) (+ 1.0 (* k (+ k 10.0))))) (* a (pow k m))))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 3.5) {
		tmp = a * (pow(k, m) / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0))));
	} else {
		tmp = a * pow(k, m);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 3.5d0) then
        tmp = a * ((k ** m) / (1.0d0 + (k * (k + 10.0d0))))
    else
        tmp = a * (k ** m)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 3.5) {
		tmp = a * (Math.pow(k, m) / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0))));
	} else {
		tmp = a * Math.pow(k, m);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 3.5:
		tmp = a * (math.pow(k, m) / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0))))
	else:
		tmp = a * math.pow(k, m)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 3.5)
		tmp = Float64(a * Float64((k ^ m) / Float64(1.0 + Float64(k * Float64(k + 10.0)))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(a * (k ^ m));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 3.5)
		tmp = a * ((k ^ m) / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0))));
	else
		tmp = a * (k ^ m);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := If[LessEqual[m, 3.5], N[(a * N[(N[Power[k, m], $MachinePrecision] / N[(1.0 + N[(k * N[(k + 10.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(a * N[Power[k, m], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 3.5

   1. Initial program 99.0%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 98.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 98.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 98.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 98.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 98.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 98.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 98.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 98.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 98.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 98.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   if 3.5 < m

   1. Initial program 81.1%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 81.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 81.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 81.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 81.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 81.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 81.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 81.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 81.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 81.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 81.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in k around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot {k}^{m}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{k}^{m} \cdot a} \]

   7. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{k}^{m} \cdot a} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 3.5:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(k + 10\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot {k}^{m}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 96.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := a \cdot {k}^{m}\\ \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{t\_0}{1 + k \cdot k}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* a (pow k m)))) (if (<= m 1.0) (/ t_0 (+ 1.0 (* k k))) t_0)))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double t_0 = a * pow(k, m);
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.0) {
		tmp = t_0 / (1.0 + (k * k));
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = a * (k ** m)
    if (m <= 1.0d0) then
        tmp = t_0 / (1.0d0 + (k * k))
    else
        tmp = t_0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double t_0 = a * Math.pow(k, m);
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.0) {
		tmp = t_0 / (1.0 + (k * k));
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	t_0 = a * math.pow(k, m)
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 1.0:
		tmp = t_0 / (1.0 + (k * k))
	else:
		tmp = t_0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	t_0 = Float64(a * (k ^ m))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 1.0)
		tmp = Float64(t_0 / Float64(1.0 + Float64(k * k)));
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(a, k, m)
	t_0 = a * (k ^ m);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 1.0)
		tmp = t_0 / (1.0 + (k * k));
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(a * N[Power[k, m], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[m, 1.0], N[(t$95$0 / N[(1.0 + N[(k * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$0]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 1

   1. Initial program 99.0%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 98.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 98.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 98.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 98.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 98.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 98.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 98.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 98.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 98.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 98.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around 0 99.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in k around inf 97.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \color{blue}{k}} \]

   if 1 < m

   1. Initial program 81.1%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 81.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 81.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 81.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 81.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 81.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 81.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 81.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 81.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 81.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 81.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in k around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot {k}^{m}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{k}^{m} \cdot a} \]

   7. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{k}^{m} \cdot a} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot k}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot {k}^{m}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 96.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 6.6:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot k}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot {k}^{m}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= m 6.6) (* a (/ (pow k m) (+ 1.0 (* k k)))) (* a (pow k m))))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 6.6) {
		tmp = a * (pow(k, m) / (1.0 + (k * k)));
	} else {
		tmp = a * pow(k, m);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 6.6d0) then
        tmp = a * ((k ** m) / (1.0d0 + (k * k)))
    else
        tmp = a * (k ** m)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 6.6) {
		tmp = a * (Math.pow(k, m) / (1.0 + (k * k)));
	} else {
		tmp = a * Math.pow(k, m);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 6.6:
		tmp = a * (math.pow(k, m) / (1.0 + (k * k)))
	else:
		tmp = a * math.pow(k, m)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 6.6)
		tmp = Float64(a * Float64((k ^ m) / Float64(1.0 + Float64(k * k))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(a * (k ^ m));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 6.6)
		tmp = a * ((k ^ m) / (1.0 + (k * k)));
	else
		tmp = a * (k ^ m);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := If[LessEqual[m, 6.6], N[(a * N[(N[Power[k, m], $MachinePrecision] / N[(1.0 + N[(k * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(a * N[Power[k, m], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 6.5999999999999996

   1. Initial program 99.0%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 98.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 98.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 98.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 98.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 98.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 98.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 98.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 98.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 98.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 98.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in k around inf 97.6%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \color{blue}{k}} \]

   if 6.5999999999999996 < m

   1. Initial program 81.1%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 81.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 81.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 81.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 81.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 81.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 81.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 81.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 81.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 81.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 81.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in k around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot {k}^{m}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{k}^{m} \cdot a} \]

   7. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{k}^{m} \cdot a} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 6.6:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot k}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot {k}^{m}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 96.1% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq -3.6 \cdot 10^{+20} \lor \neg \left(m \leq 8.4 \cdot 10^{-13}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot {k}^{m}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(k + 10\right)}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= m -3.6e+20) (not (<= m 8.4e-13)))
   (* a (pow k m))
   (/ a (+ 1.0 (* k (+ k 10.0))))))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if ((m <= -3.6e+20) || !(m <= 8.4e-13)) {
		tmp = a * pow(k, m);
	} else {
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((m <= (-3.6d+20)) .or. (.not. (m <= 8.4d-13))) then
        tmp = a * (k ** m)
    else
        tmp = a / (1.0d0 + (k * (k + 10.0d0)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if ((m <= -3.6e+20) || !(m <= 8.4e-13)) {
		tmp = a * Math.pow(k, m);
	} else {
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	tmp = 0
	if (m <= -3.6e+20) or not (m <= 8.4e-13):
		tmp = a * math.pow(k, m)
	else:
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((m <= -3.6e+20) || !(m <= 8.4e-13))
		tmp = Float64(a * (k ^ m));
	else
		tmp = Float64(a / Float64(1.0 + Float64(k * Float64(k + 10.0))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((m <= -3.6e+20) || ~((m <= 8.4e-13)))
		tmp = a * (k ^ m);
	else
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := If[Or[LessEqual[m, -3.6e+20], N[Not[LessEqual[m, 8.4e-13]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(a * N[Power[k, m], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(a / N[(1.0 + N[(k * N[(k + 10.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < -3.6e20 or 8.39999999999999955e-13 < m

   1. Initial program 89.8%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 89.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 89.8%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 89.8%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 89.8%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 89.8%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 89.8%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 89.8%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 89.8%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 89.8%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 89.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in k around 0 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot {k}^{m}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{k}^{m} \cdot a} \]

   7. Simplified 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{k}^{m} \cdot a} \]

   if -3.6e20 < m < 8.39999999999999955e-13

   1. Initial program 97.9%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 97.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 97.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 97.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 97.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 97.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 97.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 97.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 97.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 97.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 97.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 97.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq -3.6 \cdot 10^{+20} \lor \neg \left(m \leq 8.4 \cdot 10^{-13}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot {k}^{m}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(k + 10\right)}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 54.6% accurate, 7.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 2.3:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(k + 10\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a + a \cdot \left(k \cdot \left(k \cdot 100 - 10\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= m 2.3)
   (/ a (+ 1.0 (* k (+ k 10.0))))
   (+ a (* a (* k (- (* k 100.0) 10.0))))))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 2.3) {
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0)));
	} else {
		tmp = a + (a * (k * ((k * 100.0) - 10.0)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 2.3d0) then
        tmp = a / (1.0d0 + (k * (k + 10.0d0)))
    else
        tmp = a + (a * (k * ((k * 100.0d0) - 10.0d0)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 2.3) {
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0)));
	} else {
		tmp = a + (a * (k * ((k * 100.0) - 10.0)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 2.3:
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0)))
	else:
		tmp = a + (a * (k * ((k * 100.0) - 10.0)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 2.3)
		tmp = Float64(a / Float64(1.0 + Float64(k * Float64(k + 10.0))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(a + Float64(a * Float64(k * Float64(Float64(k * 100.0) - 10.0))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 2.3)
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0)));
	else
		tmp = a + (a * (k * ((k * 100.0) - 10.0)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := If[LessEqual[m, 2.3], N[(a / N[(1.0 + N[(k * N[(k + 10.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(a + N[(a * N[(k * N[(N[(k * 100.0), $MachinePrecision] - 10.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 2.2999999999999998

   1. Initial program 99.0%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 98.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 98.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 98.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 98.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 98.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 98.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 98.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 98.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 98.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 98.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 67.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   if 2.2999999999999998 < m

   1. Initial program 81.1%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 81.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 81.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 81.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 81.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 81.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 81.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 81.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 81.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 81.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 81.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 3.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in k around 0 2.9%

      \[\leadsto \frac{a}{1 + \color{blue}{10 \cdot k}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 2.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot 10}} \]

   8. Simplified 2.9%

      \[\leadsto \frac{a}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot 10}} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in k around 0 23.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + k \cdot \left(100 \cdot \left(a \cdot k\right) - 10 \cdot a\right)} \]

   10. Taylor expanded in a around 0 28.2%

       \[\leadsto a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(k \cdot \left(100 \cdot k - 10\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 52.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 2.3:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(k + 10\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a + a \cdot \left(k \cdot \left(k \cdot 100 - 10\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 54.6% accurate, 7.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1.95:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(k + 10\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a + a \cdot \left(k \cdot \left(k \cdot 99 - 10\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= m 1.95)
   (/ a (+ 1.0 (* k (+ k 10.0))))
   (+ a (* a (* k (- (* k 99.0) 10.0))))))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.95) {
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0)));
	} else {
		tmp = a + (a * (k * ((k * 99.0) - 10.0)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 1.95d0) then
        tmp = a / (1.0d0 + (k * (k + 10.0d0)))
    else
        tmp = a + (a * (k * ((k * 99.0d0) - 10.0d0)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.95) {
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0)));
	} else {
		tmp = a + (a * (k * ((k * 99.0) - 10.0)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 1.95:
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0)))
	else:
		tmp = a + (a * (k * ((k * 99.0) - 10.0)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 1.95)
		tmp = Float64(a / Float64(1.0 + Float64(k * Float64(k + 10.0))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(a + Float64(a * Float64(k * Float64(Float64(k * 99.0) - 10.0))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 1.95)
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0)));
	else
		tmp = a + (a * (k * ((k * 99.0) - 10.0)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := If[LessEqual[m, 1.95], N[(a / N[(1.0 + N[(k * N[(k + 10.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(a + N[(a * N[(k * N[(N[(k * 99.0), $MachinePrecision] - 10.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 1.94999999999999996

   1. Initial program 99.0%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 98.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 98.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 98.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 98.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 98.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 98.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 98.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 98.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 98.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 98.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 67.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   if 1.94999999999999996 < m

   1. Initial program 81.1%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 81.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 81.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 81.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 81.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 81.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 81.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 81.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 81.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 81.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 81.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 3.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in k around 0 23.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + k \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(k \cdot \left(a + -100 \cdot a\right)\right) - 10 \cdot a\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. cancel-sign-sub-inv 23.3%

         \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(k \cdot \left(a + -100 \cdot a\right)\right) + \left(-10\right) \cdot a\right)} \]

      2. metadata-eval 23.3%

         \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(k \cdot \left(a + -100 \cdot a\right)\right) + \color{blue}{-10} \cdot a\right) \]

      3. associate-*r* 23.3%

         \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot k\right) \cdot \left(a + -100 \cdot a\right)} + -10 \cdot a\right) \]

      4. neg-mul-1 23.3%

         \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(-k\right)} \cdot \left(a + -100 \cdot a\right) + -10 \cdot a\right) \]

      5. distribute-rgt1-in 23.3%

         \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \left(\left(-k\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(-100 + 1\right) \cdot a\right)} + -10 \cdot a\right) \]

      6. metadata-eval 23.3%

         \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \left(\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{-99} \cdot a\right) + -10 \cdot a\right) \]

      7. *-commutative 23.3%

         \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \left(\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-99 \cdot a\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot -10}\right) \]

   8. Simplified 23.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + k \cdot \left(\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-99 \cdot a\right) + a \cdot -10\right)} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in a around 0 28.2%

      \[\leadsto a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(k \cdot \left(99 \cdot k - 10\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 52.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1.95:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(k + 10\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a + a \cdot \left(k \cdot \left(k \cdot 99 - 10\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 52.8% accurate, 8.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 2.2:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(k + 10\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a + k \cdot \left(100 \cdot \left(a \cdot k\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= m 2.2) (/ a (+ 1.0 (* k (+ k 10.0)))) (+ a (* k (* 100.0 (* a k))))))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 2.2) {
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0)));
	} else {
		tmp = a + (k * (100.0 * (a * k)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 2.2d0) then
        tmp = a / (1.0d0 + (k * (k + 10.0d0)))
    else
        tmp = a + (k * (100.0d0 * (a * k)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 2.2) {
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0)));
	} else {
		tmp = a + (k * (100.0 * (a * k)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 2.2:
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0)))
	else:
		tmp = a + (k * (100.0 * (a * k)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 2.2)
		tmp = Float64(a / Float64(1.0 + Float64(k * Float64(k + 10.0))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(a + Float64(k * Float64(100.0 * Float64(a * k))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 2.2)
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0)));
	else
		tmp = a + (k * (100.0 * (a * k)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := If[LessEqual[m, 2.2], N[(a / N[(1.0 + N[(k * N[(k + 10.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(a + N[(k * N[(100.0 * N[(a * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 2.2000000000000002

   1. Initial program 99.0%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 98.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 98.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 98.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 98.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 98.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 98.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 98.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 98.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 98.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 98.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 67.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   if 2.2000000000000002 < m

   1. Initial program 81.1%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 81.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 81.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 81.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 81.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 81.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 81.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 81.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 81.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 81.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 81.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 3.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in k around 0 2.9%

      \[\leadsto \frac{a}{1 + \color{blue}{10 \cdot k}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 2.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot 10}} \]

   8. Simplified 2.9%

      \[\leadsto \frac{a}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot 10}} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in k around 0 23.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + k \cdot \left(100 \cdot \left(a \cdot k\right) - 10 \cdot a\right)} \]

   10. Taylor expanded in k around inf 23.3%

       \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \color{blue}{\left(100 \cdot \left(a \cdot k\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 50.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 2.2:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(k + 10\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a + k \cdot \left(100 \cdot \left(a \cdot k\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 51.9% accurate, 8.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1.92:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot k}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a + k \cdot \left(100 \cdot \left(a \cdot k\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= m 1.92) (/ a (+ 1.0 (* k k))) (+ a (* k (* 100.0 (* a k))))))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.92) {
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * k));
	} else {
		tmp = a + (k * (100.0 * (a * k)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 1.92d0) then
        tmp = a / (1.0d0 + (k * k))
    else
        tmp = a + (k * (100.0d0 * (a * k)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.92) {
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * k));
	} else {
		tmp = a + (k * (100.0 * (a * k)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 1.92:
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * k))
	else:
		tmp = a + (k * (100.0 * (a * k)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 1.92)
		tmp = Float64(a / Float64(1.0 + Float64(k * k)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(a + Float64(k * Float64(100.0 * Float64(a * k))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 1.92)
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * k));
	else
		tmp = a + (k * (100.0 * (a * k)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := If[LessEqual[m, 1.92], N[(a / N[(1.0 + N[(k * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(a + N[(k * N[(100.0 * N[(a * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 1.9199999999999999

   1. Initial program 99.0%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 98.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 98.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 98.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 98.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 98.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 98.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 98.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 98.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 98.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 98.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 67.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in k around inf 65.9%

      \[\leadsto \frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \color{blue}{k}} \]

   if 1.9199999999999999 < m

   1. Initial program 81.1%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 81.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 81.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 81.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 81.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 81.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 81.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 81.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 81.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 81.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 81.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 3.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in k around 0 2.9%

      \[\leadsto \frac{a}{1 + \color{blue}{10 \cdot k}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 2.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot 10}} \]

   8. Simplified 2.9%

      \[\leadsto \frac{a}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot 10}} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in k around 0 23.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + k \cdot \left(100 \cdot \left(a \cdot k\right) - 10 \cdot a\right)} \]

   10. Taylor expanded in k around inf 23.3%

       \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \color{blue}{\left(100 \cdot \left(a \cdot k\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 45.6% accurate, 9.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 2.2 \cdot 10^{+35}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot k}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot \left(1 + k \cdot -10\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= m 2.2e+35) (/ a (+ 1.0 (* k k))) (* a (+ 1.0 (* k -10.0)))))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 2.2e+35) {
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * k));
	} else {
		tmp = a * (1.0 + (k * -10.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 2.2d+35) then
        tmp = a / (1.0d0 + (k * k))
    else
        tmp = a * (1.0d0 + (k * (-10.0d0)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 2.2e+35) {
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * k));
	} else {
		tmp = a * (1.0 + (k * -10.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 2.2e+35:
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * k))
	else:
		tmp = a * (1.0 + (k * -10.0))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 2.2e+35)
		tmp = Float64(a / Float64(1.0 + Float64(k * k)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(a * Float64(1.0 + Float64(k * -10.0)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 2.2e+35)
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * k));
	else
		tmp = a * (1.0 + (k * -10.0));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := If[LessEqual[m, 2.2e+35], N[(a / N[(1.0 + N[(k * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(a * N[(1.0 + N[(k * -10.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 2.1999999999999999e35

   1. Initial program 97.3%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 97.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 97.2%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 97.2%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 97.2%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 97.2%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 97.2%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 97.2%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 97.2%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 97.2%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 97.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 63.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in k around inf 62.6%

      \[\leadsto \frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \color{blue}{k}} \]

   if 2.1999999999999999e35 < m

   1. Initial program 82.6%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 82.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 82.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 82.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 82.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 82.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 82.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 82.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 82.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 82.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 82.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in k around 0 79.1%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-10 \cdot \left(k \cdot {k}^{m}\right) + {k}^{m}\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 79.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(-10 \cdot k\right) \cdot {k}^{m}} + {k}^{m}\right) \]

      2. *-lft-identity 79.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(\left(-10 \cdot k\right) \cdot {k}^{m} + \color{blue}{1 \cdot {k}^{m}}\right) \]

      3. distribute-rgt-out 79.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left({k}^{m} \cdot \left(-10 \cdot k + 1\right)\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 79.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left({k}^{m} \cdot \left(\color{blue}{k \cdot -10} + 1\right)\right) \]

      5. fma-define 79.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left({k}^{m} \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(k, -10, 1\right)}\right) \]

   7. Simplified 79.1%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left({k}^{m} \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(k, -10, 1\right)\right)} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in m around 0 11.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(1 + -10 \cdot k\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 45.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 2.2 \cdot 10^{+35}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot k}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot \left(1 + k \cdot -10\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 30.3% accurate, 9.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 2.7 \cdot 10^{+42}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot 10}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot \left(1 + k \cdot -10\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= m 2.7e+42) (/ a (+ 1.0 (* k 10.0))) (* a (+ 1.0 (* k -10.0)))))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 2.7e+42) {
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * 10.0));
	} else {
		tmp = a * (1.0 + (k * -10.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 2.7d+42) then
        tmp = a / (1.0d0 + (k * 10.0d0))
    else
        tmp = a * (1.0d0 + (k * (-10.0d0)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 2.7e+42) {
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * 10.0));
	} else {
		tmp = a * (1.0 + (k * -10.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 2.7e+42:
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * 10.0))
	else:
		tmp = a * (1.0 + (k * -10.0))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 2.7e+42)
		tmp = Float64(a / Float64(1.0 + Float64(k * 10.0)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(a * Float64(1.0 + Float64(k * -10.0)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 2.7e+42)
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * 10.0));
	else
		tmp = a * (1.0 + (k * -10.0));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := If[LessEqual[m, 2.7e+42], N[(a / N[(1.0 + N[(k * 10.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(a * N[(1.0 + N[(k * -10.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 2.7000000000000001e42

   1. Initial program 97.3%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 97.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 97.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 97.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 97.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 97.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 97.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 97.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 97.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 97.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 97.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 63.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in k around 0 34.6%

      \[\leadsto \frac{a}{1 + \color{blue}{10 \cdot k}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 34.6%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot 10}} \]

   8. Simplified 34.6%

      \[\leadsto \frac{a}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot 10}} \]

   if 2.7000000000000001e42 < m

   1. Initial program 82.1%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 82.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 82.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 82.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 82.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 82.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 82.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 82.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 82.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 82.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 82.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in k around 0 78.6%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-10 \cdot \left(k \cdot {k}^{m}\right) + {k}^{m}\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 78.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(-10 \cdot k\right) \cdot {k}^{m}} + {k}^{m}\right) \]

      2. *-lft-identity 78.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(\left(-10 \cdot k\right) \cdot {k}^{m} + \color{blue}{1 \cdot {k}^{m}}\right) \]

      3. distribute-rgt-out 78.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left({k}^{m} \cdot \left(-10 \cdot k + 1\right)\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 78.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left({k}^{m} \cdot \left(\color{blue}{k \cdot -10} + 1\right)\right) \]

      5. fma-define 78.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left({k}^{m} \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(k, -10, 1\right)}\right) \]

   7. Simplified 78.6%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left({k}^{m} \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(k, -10, 1\right)\right)} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in m around 0 12.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(1 + -10 \cdot k\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 27.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 2.7 \cdot 10^{+42}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot 10}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot \left(1 + k \cdot -10\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 12: 27.5% accurate, 9.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq -0.00044:\\ \;\;\;\;0.1 \cdot \frac{a}{k}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot \left(1 + k \cdot -10\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= m -0.00044) (* 0.1 (/ a k)) (* a (+ 1.0 (* k -10.0)))))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= -0.00044) {
		tmp = 0.1 * (a / k);
	} else {
		tmp = a * (1.0 + (k * -10.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= (-0.00044d0)) then
        tmp = 0.1d0 * (a / k)
    else
        tmp = a * (1.0d0 + (k * (-10.0d0)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= -0.00044) {
		tmp = 0.1 * (a / k);
	} else {
		tmp = a * (1.0 + (k * -10.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= -0.00044:
		tmp = 0.1 * (a / k)
	else:
		tmp = a * (1.0 + (k * -10.0))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= -0.00044)
		tmp = Float64(0.1 * Float64(a / k));
	else
		tmp = Float64(a * Float64(1.0 + Float64(k * -10.0)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= -0.00044)
		tmp = 0.1 * (a / k);
	else
		tmp = a * (1.0 + (k * -10.0));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := If[LessEqual[m, -0.00044], N[(0.1 * N[(a / k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(a * N[(1.0 + N[(k * -10.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < -4.40000000000000016e-4

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 100.0%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 100.0%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 100.0%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 39.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in k around 0 13.6%

      \[\leadsto \frac{a}{1 + \color{blue}{10 \cdot k}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 13.6%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot 10}} \]

   8. Simplified 13.6%

      \[\leadsto \frac{a}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot 10}} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in k around inf 18.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.1 \cdot \frac{a}{k}} \]

   if -4.40000000000000016e-4 < m

   1. Initial program 88.7%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 88.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 88.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 88.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 88.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 88.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 88.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 88.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 88.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 88.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 88.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in k around 0 66.6%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-10 \cdot \left(k \cdot {k}^{m}\right) + {k}^{m}\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 66.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(-10 \cdot k\right) \cdot {k}^{m}} + {k}^{m}\right) \]

      2. *-lft-identity 66.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(\left(-10 \cdot k\right) \cdot {k}^{m} + \color{blue}{1 \cdot {k}^{m}}\right) \]

      3. distribute-rgt-out 66.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left({k}^{m} \cdot \left(-10 \cdot k + 1\right)\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 66.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left({k}^{m} \cdot \left(\color{blue}{k \cdot -10} + 1\right)\right) \]

      5. fma-define 66.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left({k}^{m} \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(k, -10, 1\right)}\right) \]

   7. Simplified 66.6%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left({k}^{m} \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(k, -10, 1\right)\right)} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in m around 0 31.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(1 + -10 \cdot k\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 27.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq -0.00044:\\ \;\;\;\;0.1 \cdot \frac{a}{k}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot \left(1 + k \cdot -10\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 13: 26.4% accurate, 11.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq -0.00021:\\ \;\;\;\;0.1 \cdot \frac{a}{k}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m) :precision binary64 (if (<= m -0.00021) (* 0.1 (/ a k)) a))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= -0.00021) {
		tmp = 0.1 * (a / k);
	} else {
		tmp = a;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= (-0.00021d0)) then
        tmp = 0.1d0 * (a / k)
    else
        tmp = a
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= -0.00021) {
		tmp = 0.1 * (a / k);
	} else {
		tmp = a;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= -0.00021:
		tmp = 0.1 * (a / k)
	else:
		tmp = a
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= -0.00021)
		tmp = Float64(0.1 * Float64(a / k));
	else
		tmp = a;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= -0.00021)
		tmp = 0.1 * (a / k);
	else
		tmp = a;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := If[LessEqual[m, -0.00021], N[(0.1 * N[(a / k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], a]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < -2.1000000000000001e-4

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 100.0%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 100.0%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 100.0%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 39.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in k around 0 13.6%

      \[\leadsto \frac{a}{1 + \color{blue}{10 \cdot k}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 13.6%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot 10}} \]

   8. Simplified 13.6%

      \[\leadsto \frac{a}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot 10}} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in k around inf 18.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.1 \cdot \frac{a}{k}} \]

   if -2.1000000000000001e-4 < m

   1. Initial program 88.7%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 88.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 88.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 88.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 88.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 88.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 88.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 88.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 88.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 88.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 88.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 45.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in k around 0 27.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 14: 20.4% accurate, 114.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ a \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m) :precision binary64 a)

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	return a;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    code = a
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	return a;
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	return a

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	return a
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, k, m)
	tmp = a;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := a

Derivation

1. Initial program 92.3%

   \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-/l* 92.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

   2. remove-double-neg 92.3%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

   3. distribute-frac-neg2 92.3%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

   4. distribute-neg-frac2 92.3%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

   5. remove-double-neg 92.3%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

   6. sqr-neg 92.3%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

   7. associate-+l+ 92.3%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

   8. sqr-neg 92.3%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

   9. distribute-rgt-out 92.3%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

3. Simplified 92.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 43.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

6. Taylor expanded in k around 0 19.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a} \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024117 
(FPCore (a k m)
  :name "Falkner and Boettcher, Appendix A"
  :precision binary64
  (/ (* a (pow k m)) (+ (+ 1.0 (* 10.0 k)) (* k k))))