math.cos on complex, real part

Percentage Accurate: 100.0% → 100.0%
Time: 7.0s
Alternatives: 14
Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

?
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(e^{-im} + e^{im}\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (* (* 0.5 (cos re)) (+ (exp (- im)) (exp im))))
double code(double re, double im) {
	return (0.5 * cos(re)) * (exp(-im) + exp(im));
}
real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    code = (0.5d0 * cos(re)) * (exp(-im) + exp(im))
end function
public static double code(double re, double im) {
	return (0.5 * Math.cos(re)) * (Math.exp(-im) + Math.exp(im));
}
def code(re, im):
	return (0.5 * math.cos(re)) * (math.exp(-im) + math.exp(im))
function code(re, im)
	return Float64(Float64(0.5 * cos(re)) * Float64(exp(Float64(-im)) + exp(im)))
end
function tmp = code(re, im)
	tmp = (0.5 * cos(re)) * (exp(-im) + exp(im));
end
code[re_, im_] := N[(N[(0.5 * N[Cos[re], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Exp[(-im)], $MachinePrecision] + N[Exp[im], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(e^{-im} + e^{im}\right)
\end{array}

Sampling outcomes in binary64 precision:

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 14 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(e^{-im} + e^{im}\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (* (* 0.5 (cos re)) (+ (exp (- im)) (exp im))))
double code(double re, double im) {
	return (0.5 * cos(re)) * (exp(-im) + exp(im));
}
real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    code = (0.5d0 * cos(re)) * (exp(-im) + exp(im))
end function
public static double code(double re, double im) {
	return (0.5 * Math.cos(re)) * (Math.exp(-im) + Math.exp(im));
}
def code(re, im):
	return (0.5 * math.cos(re)) * (math.exp(-im) + math.exp(im))
function code(re, im)
	return Float64(Float64(0.5 * cos(re)) * Float64(exp(Float64(-im)) + exp(im)))
end
function tmp = code(re, im)
	tmp = (0.5 * cos(re)) * (exp(-im) + exp(im));
end
code[re_, im_] := N[(N[(0.5 * N[Cos[re], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Exp[(-im)], $MachinePrecision] + N[Exp[im], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(e^{-im} + e^{im}\right)
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(e^{-im} + e^{im}\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (* (* 0.5 (cos re)) (+ (exp (- im)) (exp im))))
double code(double re, double im) {
	return (0.5 * cos(re)) * (exp(-im) + exp(im));
}
real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    code = (0.5d0 * cos(re)) * (exp(-im) + exp(im))
end function
public static double code(double re, double im) {
	return (0.5 * Math.cos(re)) * (Math.exp(-im) + Math.exp(im));
}
def code(re, im):
	return (0.5 * math.cos(re)) * (math.exp(-im) + math.exp(im))
function code(re, im)
	return Float64(Float64(0.5 * cos(re)) * Float64(exp(Float64(-im)) + exp(im)))
end
function tmp = code(re, im)
	tmp = (0.5 * cos(re)) * (exp(-im) + exp(im));
end
code[re_, im_] := N[(N[(0.5 * N[Cos[re], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Exp[(-im)], $MachinePrecision] + N[Exp[im], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(e^{-im} + e^{im}\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 100.0%

    \[\left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(e^{-im} + e^{im}\right) \]
  2. Add Preprocessing
  3. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 86.0% accurate, 1.5× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := 0.5 \cdot \cos re\\ \mathbf{if}\;im \leq 3.6:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0 \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(im, im, 2\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;im \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+102}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \left(\left(e^{im} + 1\right) - im\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0 \cdot \left(\left(1 - im\right) + \left(1 + im \cdot \left(1 + im \cdot \left(0.5 + im \cdot 0.16666666666666666\right)\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* 0.5 (cos re))))
   (if (<= im 3.6)
     (* t_0 (fma im im 2.0))
     (if (<= im 5e+102)
       (* 0.5 (- (+ (exp im) 1.0) im))
       (*
        t_0
        (+
         (- 1.0 im)
         (+ 1.0 (* im (+ 1.0 (* im (+ 0.5 (* im 0.16666666666666666))))))))))))
double code(double re, double im) {
	double t_0 = 0.5 * cos(re);
	double tmp;
	if (im <= 3.6) {
		tmp = t_0 * fma(im, im, 2.0);
	} else if (im <= 5e+102) {
		tmp = 0.5 * ((exp(im) + 1.0) - im);
	} else {
		tmp = t_0 * ((1.0 - im) + (1.0 + (im * (1.0 + (im * (0.5 + (im * 0.16666666666666666)))))));
	}
	return tmp;
}
function code(re, im)
	t_0 = Float64(0.5 * cos(re))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (im <= 3.6)
		tmp = Float64(t_0 * fma(im, im, 2.0));
	elseif (im <= 5e+102)
		tmp = Float64(0.5 * Float64(Float64(exp(im) + 1.0) - im));
	else
		tmp = Float64(t_0 * Float64(Float64(1.0 - im) + Float64(1.0 + Float64(im * Float64(1.0 + Float64(im * Float64(0.5 + Float64(im * 0.16666666666666666))))))));
	end
	return tmp
end
code[re_, im_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(0.5 * N[Cos[re], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[im, 3.6], N[(t$95$0 * N[(im * im + 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[im, 5e+102], N[(0.5 * N[(N[(N[Exp[im], $MachinePrecision] + 1.0), $MachinePrecision] - im), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(t$95$0 * N[(N[(1.0 - im), $MachinePrecision] + N[(1.0 + N[(im * N[(1.0 + N[(im * N[(0.5 + N[(im * 0.16666666666666666), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := 0.5 \cdot \cos re\\
\mathbf{if}\;im \leq 3.6:\\
\;\;\;\;t\_0 \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(im, im, 2\right)\\

\mathbf{elif}\;im \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+102}:\\
\;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \left(\left(e^{im} + 1\right) - im\right)\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;t\_0 \cdot \left(\left(1 - im\right) + \left(1 + im \cdot \left(1 + im \cdot \left(0.5 + im \cdot 0.16666666666666666\right)\right)\right)\right)\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 3 regimes
  2. if im < 3.60000000000000009

    1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(e^{-im} + e^{im}\right) \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in im around 0 87.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(2 + {im}^{2}\right)} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative87.0%

        \[\leadsto \left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left({im}^{2} + 2\right)} \]
      2. unpow287.0%

        \[\leadsto \left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{im \cdot im} + 2\right) \]
      3. fma-define87.0%

        \[\leadsto \left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(im, im, 2\right)} \]
    5. Simplified87.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(im, im, 2\right)} \]

    if 3.60000000000000009 < im < 5e102

    1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(e^{-im} + e^{im}\right) \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in im around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + -1 \cdot im\right)} + e^{im}\right) \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. neg-mul-1100.0%

        \[\leadsto \left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(\left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-im\right)}\right) + e^{im}\right) \]
      2. unsub-neg100.0%

        \[\leadsto \left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 - im\right)} + e^{im}\right) \]
    5. Simplified100.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 - im\right)} + e^{im}\right) \]
    6. Taylor expanded in re around 0 71.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot \left(\left(1 + e^{im}\right) - im\right)} \]

    if 5e102 < im

    1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(e^{-im} + e^{im}\right) \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in im around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + -1 \cdot im\right)} + e^{im}\right) \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. neg-mul-1100.0%

        \[\leadsto \left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(\left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-im\right)}\right) + e^{im}\right) \]
      2. unsub-neg100.0%

        \[\leadsto \left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 - im\right)} + e^{im}\right) \]
    5. Simplified100.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 - im\right)} + e^{im}\right) \]
    6. Taylor expanded in im around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(\left(1 - im\right) + \color{blue}{\left(1 + im \cdot \left(1 + im \cdot \left(0.5 + 0.16666666666666666 \cdot im\right)\right)\right)}\right) \]
    7. Step-by-step derivation
      1. *-commutative100.0%

        \[\leadsto \left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(\left(1 - im\right) + \left(1 + im \cdot \left(1 + im \cdot \left(0.5 + \color{blue}{im \cdot 0.16666666666666666}\right)\right)\right)\right) \]
    8. Simplified100.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(\left(1 - im\right) + \color{blue}{\left(1 + im \cdot \left(1 + im \cdot \left(0.5 + im \cdot 0.16666666666666666\right)\right)\right)}\right) \]
  3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification87.8%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;im \leq 3.6:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(im, im, 2\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;im \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+102}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \left(\left(e^{im} + 1\right) - im\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(\left(1 - im\right) + \left(1 + im \cdot \left(1 + im \cdot \left(0.5 + im \cdot 0.16666666666666666\right)\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 75.4% accurate, 1.5× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(e^{im} + \left(1 - im\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (* (* 0.5 (cos re)) (+ (exp im) (- 1.0 im))))
double code(double re, double im) {
	return (0.5 * cos(re)) * (exp(im) + (1.0 - im));
}
real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    code = (0.5d0 * cos(re)) * (exp(im) + (1.0d0 - im))
end function
public static double code(double re, double im) {
	return (0.5 * Math.cos(re)) * (Math.exp(im) + (1.0 - im));
}
def code(re, im):
	return (0.5 * math.cos(re)) * (math.exp(im) + (1.0 - im))
function code(re, im)
	return Float64(Float64(0.5 * cos(re)) * Float64(exp(im) + Float64(1.0 - im)))
end
function tmp = code(re, im)
	tmp = (0.5 * cos(re)) * (exp(im) + (1.0 - im));
end
code[re_, im_] := N[(N[(0.5 * N[Cos[re], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Exp[im], $MachinePrecision] + N[(1.0 - im), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(e^{im} + \left(1 - im\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 100.0%

    \[\left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(e^{-im} + e^{im}\right) \]
  2. Add Preprocessing
  3. Taylor expanded in im around 0 78.1%

    \[\leadsto \left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + -1 \cdot im\right)} + e^{im}\right) \]
  4. Step-by-step derivation
    1. neg-mul-178.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(\left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-im\right)}\right) + e^{im}\right) \]
    2. unsub-neg78.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 - im\right)} + e^{im}\right) \]
  5. Simplified78.1%

    \[\leadsto \left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 - im\right)} + e^{im}\right) \]
  6. Final simplification78.1%

    \[\leadsto \left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(e^{im} + \left(1 - im\right)\right) \]
  7. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 72.0% accurate, 2.4× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;im \leq 6.9 \lor \neg \left(im \leq 10^{+103}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(\left(1 - im\right) + \left(1 + im \cdot \left(1 + im \cdot \left(0.5 + im \cdot 0.16666666666666666\right)\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \left(\left(e^{im} + 1\right) - im\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= im 6.9) (not (<= im 1e+103)))
   (*
    (* 0.5 (cos re))
    (+
     (- 1.0 im)
     (+ 1.0 (* im (+ 1.0 (* im (+ 0.5 (* im 0.16666666666666666))))))))
   (* 0.5 (- (+ (exp im) 1.0) im))))
double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if ((im <= 6.9) || !(im <= 1e+103)) {
		tmp = (0.5 * cos(re)) * ((1.0 - im) + (1.0 + (im * (1.0 + (im * (0.5 + (im * 0.16666666666666666)))))));
	} else {
		tmp = 0.5 * ((exp(im) + 1.0) - im);
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((im <= 6.9d0) .or. (.not. (im <= 1d+103))) then
        tmp = (0.5d0 * cos(re)) * ((1.0d0 - im) + (1.0d0 + (im * (1.0d0 + (im * (0.5d0 + (im * 0.16666666666666666d0)))))))
    else
        tmp = 0.5d0 * ((exp(im) + 1.0d0) - im)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if ((im <= 6.9) || !(im <= 1e+103)) {
		tmp = (0.5 * Math.cos(re)) * ((1.0 - im) + (1.0 + (im * (1.0 + (im * (0.5 + (im * 0.16666666666666666)))))));
	} else {
		tmp = 0.5 * ((Math.exp(im) + 1.0) - im);
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(re, im):
	tmp = 0
	if (im <= 6.9) or not (im <= 1e+103):
		tmp = (0.5 * math.cos(re)) * ((1.0 - im) + (1.0 + (im * (1.0 + (im * (0.5 + (im * 0.16666666666666666)))))))
	else:
		tmp = 0.5 * ((math.exp(im) + 1.0) - im)
	return tmp
function code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((im <= 6.9) || !(im <= 1e+103))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(0.5 * cos(re)) * Float64(Float64(1.0 - im) + Float64(1.0 + Float64(im * Float64(1.0 + Float64(im * Float64(0.5 + Float64(im * 0.16666666666666666))))))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(0.5 * Float64(Float64(exp(im) + 1.0) - im));
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((im <= 6.9) || ~((im <= 1e+103)))
		tmp = (0.5 * cos(re)) * ((1.0 - im) + (1.0 + (im * (1.0 + (im * (0.5 + (im * 0.16666666666666666)))))));
	else
		tmp = 0.5 * ((exp(im) + 1.0) - im);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[re_, im_] := If[Or[LessEqual[im, 6.9], N[Not[LessEqual[im, 1e+103]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(0.5 * N[Cos[re], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[(1.0 - im), $MachinePrecision] + N[(1.0 + N[(im * N[(1.0 + N[(im * N[(0.5 + N[(im * 0.16666666666666666), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(0.5 * N[(N[(N[Exp[im], $MachinePrecision] + 1.0), $MachinePrecision] - im), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;im \leq 6.9 \lor \neg \left(im \leq 10^{+103}\right):\\
\;\;\;\;\left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(\left(1 - im\right) + \left(1 + im \cdot \left(1 + im \cdot \left(0.5 + im \cdot 0.16666666666666666\right)\right)\right)\right)\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \left(\left(e^{im} + 1\right) - im\right)\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if im < 6.9000000000000004 or 1e103 < im

    1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(e^{-im} + e^{im}\right) \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in im around 0 76.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + -1 \cdot im\right)} + e^{im}\right) \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. neg-mul-176.1%

        \[\leadsto \left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(\left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-im\right)}\right) + e^{im}\right) \]
      2. unsub-neg76.1%

        \[\leadsto \left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 - im\right)} + e^{im}\right) \]
    5. Simplified76.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 - im\right)} + e^{im}\right) \]
    6. Taylor expanded in im around 0 74.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(\left(1 - im\right) + \color{blue}{\left(1 + im \cdot \left(1 + im \cdot \left(0.5 + 0.16666666666666666 \cdot im\right)\right)\right)}\right) \]
    7. Step-by-step derivation
      1. *-commutative74.8%

        \[\leadsto \left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(\left(1 - im\right) + \left(1 + im \cdot \left(1 + im \cdot \left(0.5 + \color{blue}{im \cdot 0.16666666666666666}\right)\right)\right)\right) \]
    8. Simplified74.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(\left(1 - im\right) + \color{blue}{\left(1 + im \cdot \left(1 + im \cdot \left(0.5 + im \cdot 0.16666666666666666\right)\right)\right)}\right) \]

    if 6.9000000000000004 < im < 1e103

    1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(e^{-im} + e^{im}\right) \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in im around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + -1 \cdot im\right)} + e^{im}\right) \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. neg-mul-1100.0%

        \[\leadsto \left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(\left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-im\right)}\right) + e^{im}\right) \]
      2. unsub-neg100.0%

        \[\leadsto \left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 - im\right)} + e^{im}\right) \]
    5. Simplified100.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 - im\right)} + e^{im}\right) \]
    6. Taylor expanded in re around 0 71.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot \left(\left(1 + e^{im}\right) - im\right)} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification74.5%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;im \leq 6.9 \lor \neg \left(im \leq 10^{+103}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(\left(1 - im\right) + \left(1 + im \cdot \left(1 + im \cdot \left(0.5 + im \cdot 0.16666666666666666\right)\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \left(\left(e^{im} + 1\right) - im\right)\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 84.6% accurate, 2.5× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;im \leq 2.5 \lor \neg \left(im \leq 1.9 \cdot 10^{+154}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \left(\cos re \cdot \left(\left(2 + im \cdot \left(1 + 0.5 \cdot im\right)\right) - im\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \left(\left(e^{im} + 1\right) - im\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= im 2.5) (not (<= im 1.9e+154)))
   (* 0.5 (* (cos re) (- (+ 2.0 (* im (+ 1.0 (* 0.5 im)))) im)))
   (* 0.5 (- (+ (exp im) 1.0) im))))
double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if ((im <= 2.5) || !(im <= 1.9e+154)) {
		tmp = 0.5 * (cos(re) * ((2.0 + (im * (1.0 + (0.5 * im)))) - im));
	} else {
		tmp = 0.5 * ((exp(im) + 1.0) - im);
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((im <= 2.5d0) .or. (.not. (im <= 1.9d+154))) then
        tmp = 0.5d0 * (cos(re) * ((2.0d0 + (im * (1.0d0 + (0.5d0 * im)))) - im))
    else
        tmp = 0.5d0 * ((exp(im) + 1.0d0) - im)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if ((im <= 2.5) || !(im <= 1.9e+154)) {
		tmp = 0.5 * (Math.cos(re) * ((2.0 + (im * (1.0 + (0.5 * im)))) - im));
	} else {
		tmp = 0.5 * ((Math.exp(im) + 1.0) - im);
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(re, im):
	tmp = 0
	if (im <= 2.5) or not (im <= 1.9e+154):
		tmp = 0.5 * (math.cos(re) * ((2.0 + (im * (1.0 + (0.5 * im)))) - im))
	else:
		tmp = 0.5 * ((math.exp(im) + 1.0) - im)
	return tmp
function code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((im <= 2.5) || !(im <= 1.9e+154))
		tmp = Float64(0.5 * Float64(cos(re) * Float64(Float64(2.0 + Float64(im * Float64(1.0 + Float64(0.5 * im)))) - im)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(0.5 * Float64(Float64(exp(im) + 1.0) - im));
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((im <= 2.5) || ~((im <= 1.9e+154)))
		tmp = 0.5 * (cos(re) * ((2.0 + (im * (1.0 + (0.5 * im)))) - im));
	else
		tmp = 0.5 * ((exp(im) + 1.0) - im);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[re_, im_] := If[Or[LessEqual[im, 2.5], N[Not[LessEqual[im, 1.9e+154]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(0.5 * N[(N[Cos[re], $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[(2.0 + N[(im * N[(1.0 + N[(0.5 * im), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - im), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(0.5 * N[(N[(N[Exp[im], $MachinePrecision] + 1.0), $MachinePrecision] - im), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;im \leq 2.5 \lor \neg \left(im \leq 1.9 \cdot 10^{+154}\right):\\
\;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \left(\cos re \cdot \left(\left(2 + im \cdot \left(1 + 0.5 \cdot im\right)\right) - im\right)\right)\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \left(\left(e^{im} + 1\right) - im\right)\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if im < 2.5 or 1.8999999999999999e154 < im

    1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(e^{-im} + e^{im}\right) \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in im around 0 75.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + -1 \cdot im\right)} + e^{im}\right) \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. neg-mul-175.0%

        \[\leadsto \left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(\left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-im\right)}\right) + e^{im}\right) \]
      2. unsub-neg75.0%

        \[\leadsto \left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 - im\right)} + e^{im}\right) \]
    5. Simplified75.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 - im\right)} + e^{im}\right) \]
    6. Taylor expanded in im around 0 88.5%

      \[\leadsto \left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(\left(1 - im\right) + \color{blue}{\left(1 + im \cdot \left(1 + 0.5 \cdot im\right)\right)}\right) \]
    7. Taylor expanded in re around inf 88.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot \left(\cos re \cdot \left(\left(2 + im \cdot \left(1 + 0.5 \cdot im\right)\right) - im\right)\right)} \]

    if 2.5 < im < 1.8999999999999999e154

    1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(e^{-im} + e^{im}\right) \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in im around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + -1 \cdot im\right)} + e^{im}\right) \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. neg-mul-1100.0%

        \[\leadsto \left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(\left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-im\right)}\right) + e^{im}\right) \]
      2. unsub-neg100.0%

        \[\leadsto \left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 - im\right)} + e^{im}\right) \]
    5. Simplified100.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 - im\right)} + e^{im}\right) \]
    6. Taylor expanded in re around 0 71.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot \left(\left(1 + e^{im}\right) - im\right)} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification86.4%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;im \leq 2.5 \lor \neg \left(im \leq 1.9 \cdot 10^{+154}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \left(\cos re \cdot \left(\left(2 + im \cdot \left(1 + 0.5 \cdot im\right)\right) - im\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \left(\left(e^{im} + 1\right) - im\right)\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 65.1% accurate, 2.7× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;im \leq 540:\\ \;\;\;\;\cos re\\ \mathbf{elif}\;im \leq 1.25 \cdot 10^{+73}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 - {re}^{2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{im}^{4} \cdot 0.041666666666666664\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= im 540.0)
   (cos re)
   (if (<= im 1.25e+73)
     (- 2.0 (pow re 2.0))
     (* (pow im 4.0) 0.041666666666666664))))
double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if (im <= 540.0) {
		tmp = cos(re);
	} else if (im <= 1.25e+73) {
		tmp = 2.0 - pow(re, 2.0);
	} else {
		tmp = pow(im, 4.0) * 0.041666666666666664;
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (im <= 540.0d0) then
        tmp = cos(re)
    else if (im <= 1.25d+73) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 - (re ** 2.0d0)
    else
        tmp = (im ** 4.0d0) * 0.041666666666666664d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if (im <= 540.0) {
		tmp = Math.cos(re);
	} else if (im <= 1.25e+73) {
		tmp = 2.0 - Math.pow(re, 2.0);
	} else {
		tmp = Math.pow(im, 4.0) * 0.041666666666666664;
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(re, im):
	tmp = 0
	if im <= 540.0:
		tmp = math.cos(re)
	elif im <= 1.25e+73:
		tmp = 2.0 - math.pow(re, 2.0)
	else:
		tmp = math.pow(im, 4.0) * 0.041666666666666664
	return tmp
function code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (im <= 540.0)
		tmp = cos(re);
	elseif (im <= 1.25e+73)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 - (re ^ 2.0));
	else
		tmp = Float64((im ^ 4.0) * 0.041666666666666664);
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (im <= 540.0)
		tmp = cos(re);
	elseif (im <= 1.25e+73)
		tmp = 2.0 - (re ^ 2.0);
	else
		tmp = (im ^ 4.0) * 0.041666666666666664;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[re_, im_] := If[LessEqual[im, 540.0], N[Cos[re], $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[im, 1.25e+73], N[(2.0 - N[Power[re, 2.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[Power[im, 4.0], $MachinePrecision] * 0.041666666666666664), $MachinePrecision]]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;im \leq 540:\\
\;\;\;\;\cos re\\

\mathbf{elif}\;im \leq 1.25 \cdot 10^{+73}:\\
\;\;\;\;2 - {re}^{2}\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;{im}^{4} \cdot 0.041666666666666664\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 3 regimes
  2. if im < 540

    1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(e^{-im} + e^{im}\right) \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in im around 0 70.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\cos re} \]

    if 540 < im < 1.24999999999999994e73

    1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(e^{-im} + e^{im}\right) \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Applied egg-rr3.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\cos re + \cos re} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. count-23.1%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \cos re} \]
    5. Simplified3.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \cos re} \]
    6. Taylor expanded in re around 0 29.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 + -1 \cdot {re}^{2}} \]

    if 1.24999999999999994e73 < im

    1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(e^{-im} + e^{im}\right) \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in im around 0 98.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(2 + {im}^{2} \cdot \left(1 + 0.08333333333333333 \cdot {im}^{2}\right)\right)} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative98.0%

        \[\leadsto \left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left({im}^{2} \cdot \left(1 + 0.08333333333333333 \cdot {im}^{2}\right) + 2\right)} \]
      2. distribute-lft-in98.0%

        \[\leadsto \left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left({im}^{2} \cdot 1 + {im}^{2} \cdot \left(0.08333333333333333 \cdot {im}^{2}\right)\right)} + 2\right) \]
      3. *-rgt-identity98.0%

        \[\leadsto \left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(\left(\color{blue}{{im}^{2}} + {im}^{2} \cdot \left(0.08333333333333333 \cdot {im}^{2}\right)\right) + 2\right) \]
      4. associate-+l+98.0%

        \[\leadsto \left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left({im}^{2} + \left({im}^{2} \cdot \left(0.08333333333333333 \cdot {im}^{2}\right) + 2\right)\right)} \]
      5. unpow298.0%

        \[\leadsto \left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{im \cdot im} + \left({im}^{2} \cdot \left(0.08333333333333333 \cdot {im}^{2}\right) + 2\right)\right) \]
      6. fma-define98.0%

        \[\leadsto \left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(im, im, {im}^{2} \cdot \left(0.08333333333333333 \cdot {im}^{2}\right) + 2\right)} \]
      7. *-commutative98.0%

        \[\leadsto \left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(im, im, \color{blue}{\left(0.08333333333333333 \cdot {im}^{2}\right) \cdot {im}^{2}} + 2\right) \]
      8. associate-*l*98.0%

        \[\leadsto \left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(im, im, \color{blue}{0.08333333333333333 \cdot \left({im}^{2} \cdot {im}^{2}\right)} + 2\right) \]
      9. fma-define98.0%

        \[\leadsto \left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(im, im, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(0.08333333333333333, {im}^{2} \cdot {im}^{2}, 2\right)}\right) \]
      10. pow-sqr98.0%

        \[\leadsto \left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(im, im, \mathsf{fma}\left(0.08333333333333333, \color{blue}{{im}^{\left(2 \cdot 2\right)}}, 2\right)\right) \]
      11. metadata-eval98.0%

        \[\leadsto \left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(im, im, \mathsf{fma}\left(0.08333333333333333, {im}^{\color{blue}{4}}, 2\right)\right) \]
    5. Simplified98.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(im, im, \mathsf{fma}\left(0.08333333333333333, {im}^{4}, 2\right)\right)} \]
    6. Taylor expanded in im around inf 98.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.041666666666666664 \cdot \left({im}^{4} \cdot \cos re\right)} \]
    7. Step-by-step derivation
      1. *-commutative98.0%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left({im}^{4} \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot 0.041666666666666664} \]
      2. associate-*r*98.0%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{im}^{4} \cdot \left(\cos re \cdot 0.041666666666666664\right)} \]
    8. Simplified98.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{im}^{4} \cdot \left(\cos re \cdot 0.041666666666666664\right)} \]
    9. Taylor expanded in re around 0 63.9%

      \[\leadsto {im}^{4} \cdot \color{blue}{0.041666666666666664} \]
  3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification66.4%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;im \leq 540:\\ \;\;\;\;\cos re\\ \mathbf{elif}\;im \leq 1.25 \cdot 10^{+73}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 - {re}^{2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{im}^{4} \cdot 0.041666666666666664\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 68.6% accurate, 2.7× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;im \leq 3.8:\\ \;\;\;\;\cos re\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \left(\left(e^{im} + 1\right) - im\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= im 3.8) (cos re) (* 0.5 (- (+ (exp im) 1.0) im))))
double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if (im <= 3.8) {
		tmp = cos(re);
	} else {
		tmp = 0.5 * ((exp(im) + 1.0) - im);
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (im <= 3.8d0) then
        tmp = cos(re)
    else
        tmp = 0.5d0 * ((exp(im) + 1.0d0) - im)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if (im <= 3.8) {
		tmp = Math.cos(re);
	} else {
		tmp = 0.5 * ((Math.exp(im) + 1.0) - im);
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(re, im):
	tmp = 0
	if im <= 3.8:
		tmp = math.cos(re)
	else:
		tmp = 0.5 * ((math.exp(im) + 1.0) - im)
	return tmp
function code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (im <= 3.8)
		tmp = cos(re);
	else
		tmp = Float64(0.5 * Float64(Float64(exp(im) + 1.0) - im));
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (im <= 3.8)
		tmp = cos(re);
	else
		tmp = 0.5 * ((exp(im) + 1.0) - im);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[re_, im_] := If[LessEqual[im, 3.8], N[Cos[re], $MachinePrecision], N[(0.5 * N[(N[(N[Exp[im], $MachinePrecision] + 1.0), $MachinePrecision] - im), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;im \leq 3.8:\\
\;\;\;\;\cos re\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \left(\left(e^{im} + 1\right) - im\right)\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if im < 3.7999999999999998

    1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(e^{-im} + e^{im}\right) \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in im around 0 70.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\cos re} \]

    if 3.7999999999999998 < im

    1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(e^{-im} + e^{im}\right) \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in im around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + -1 \cdot im\right)} + e^{im}\right) \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. neg-mul-1100.0%

        \[\leadsto \left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(\left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-im\right)}\right) + e^{im}\right) \]
      2. unsub-neg100.0%

        \[\leadsto \left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 - im\right)} + e^{im}\right) \]
    5. Simplified100.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 - im\right)} + e^{im}\right) \]
    6. Taylor expanded in re around 0 66.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot \left(\left(1 + e^{im}\right) - im\right)} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification69.3%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;im \leq 3.8:\\ \;\;\;\;\cos re\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \left(\left(e^{im} + 1\right) - im\right)\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 64.4% accurate, 2.8× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;im \leq 4.7 \cdot 10^{+26}:\\ \;\;\;\;\cos re\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{im}^{4} \cdot 0.041666666666666664\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= im 4.7e+26) (cos re) (* (pow im 4.0) 0.041666666666666664)))
double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if (im <= 4.7e+26) {
		tmp = cos(re);
	} else {
		tmp = pow(im, 4.0) * 0.041666666666666664;
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (im <= 4.7d+26) then
        tmp = cos(re)
    else
        tmp = (im ** 4.0d0) * 0.041666666666666664d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if (im <= 4.7e+26) {
		tmp = Math.cos(re);
	} else {
		tmp = Math.pow(im, 4.0) * 0.041666666666666664;
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(re, im):
	tmp = 0
	if im <= 4.7e+26:
		tmp = math.cos(re)
	else:
		tmp = math.pow(im, 4.0) * 0.041666666666666664
	return tmp
function code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (im <= 4.7e+26)
		tmp = cos(re);
	else
		tmp = Float64((im ^ 4.0) * 0.041666666666666664);
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (im <= 4.7e+26)
		tmp = cos(re);
	else
		tmp = (im ^ 4.0) * 0.041666666666666664;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[re_, im_] := If[LessEqual[im, 4.7e+26], N[Cos[re], $MachinePrecision], N[(N[Power[im, 4.0], $MachinePrecision] * 0.041666666666666664), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;im \leq 4.7 \cdot 10^{+26}:\\
\;\;\;\;\cos re\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;{im}^{4} \cdot 0.041666666666666664\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if im < 4.6999999999999998e26

    1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(e^{-im} + e^{im}\right) \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in im around 0 69.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\cos re} \]

    if 4.6999999999999998e26 < im

    1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(e^{-im} + e^{im}\right) \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in im around 0 75.7%

      \[\leadsto \left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(2 + {im}^{2} \cdot \left(1 + 0.08333333333333333 \cdot {im}^{2}\right)\right)} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative75.7%

        \[\leadsto \left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left({im}^{2} \cdot \left(1 + 0.08333333333333333 \cdot {im}^{2}\right) + 2\right)} \]
      2. distribute-lft-in75.7%

        \[\leadsto \left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left({im}^{2} \cdot 1 + {im}^{2} \cdot \left(0.08333333333333333 \cdot {im}^{2}\right)\right)} + 2\right) \]
      3. *-rgt-identity75.7%

        \[\leadsto \left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(\left(\color{blue}{{im}^{2}} + {im}^{2} \cdot \left(0.08333333333333333 \cdot {im}^{2}\right)\right) + 2\right) \]
      4. associate-+l+75.7%

        \[\leadsto \left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left({im}^{2} + \left({im}^{2} \cdot \left(0.08333333333333333 \cdot {im}^{2}\right) + 2\right)\right)} \]
      5. unpow275.7%

        \[\leadsto \left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{im \cdot im} + \left({im}^{2} \cdot \left(0.08333333333333333 \cdot {im}^{2}\right) + 2\right)\right) \]
      6. fma-define75.7%

        \[\leadsto \left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(im, im, {im}^{2} \cdot \left(0.08333333333333333 \cdot {im}^{2}\right) + 2\right)} \]
      7. *-commutative75.7%

        \[\leadsto \left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(im, im, \color{blue}{\left(0.08333333333333333 \cdot {im}^{2}\right) \cdot {im}^{2}} + 2\right) \]
      8. associate-*l*75.7%

        \[\leadsto \left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(im, im, \color{blue}{0.08333333333333333 \cdot \left({im}^{2} \cdot {im}^{2}\right)} + 2\right) \]
      9. fma-define75.7%

        \[\leadsto \left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(im, im, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(0.08333333333333333, {im}^{2} \cdot {im}^{2}, 2\right)}\right) \]
      10. pow-sqr75.7%

        \[\leadsto \left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(im, im, \mathsf{fma}\left(0.08333333333333333, \color{blue}{{im}^{\left(2 \cdot 2\right)}}, 2\right)\right) \]
      11. metadata-eval75.7%

        \[\leadsto \left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(im, im, \mathsf{fma}\left(0.08333333333333333, {im}^{\color{blue}{4}}, 2\right)\right) \]
    5. Simplified75.7%

      \[\leadsto \left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(im, im, \mathsf{fma}\left(0.08333333333333333, {im}^{4}, 2\right)\right)} \]
    6. Taylor expanded in im around inf 75.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.041666666666666664 \cdot \left({im}^{4} \cdot \cos re\right)} \]
    7. Step-by-step derivation
      1. *-commutative75.7%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left({im}^{4} \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot 0.041666666666666664} \]
      2. associate-*r*75.7%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{im}^{4} \cdot \left(\cos re \cdot 0.041666666666666664\right)} \]
    8. Simplified75.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{im}^{4} \cdot \left(\cos re \cdot 0.041666666666666664\right)} \]
    9. Taylor expanded in re around 0 49.4%

      \[\leadsto {im}^{4} \cdot \color{blue}{0.041666666666666664} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 62.9% accurate, 2.9× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;im \leq 8.5 \cdot 10^{+54}:\\ \;\;\;\;\cos re\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \left(\left(2 + im \cdot \left(1 + im \cdot \left(0.5 + im \cdot 0.16666666666666666\right)\right)\right) - im\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= im 8.5e+54)
   (cos re)
   (*
    0.5
    (- (+ 2.0 (* im (+ 1.0 (* im (+ 0.5 (* im 0.16666666666666666)))))) im))))
double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if (im <= 8.5e+54) {
		tmp = cos(re);
	} else {
		tmp = 0.5 * ((2.0 + (im * (1.0 + (im * (0.5 + (im * 0.16666666666666666)))))) - im);
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (im <= 8.5d+54) then
        tmp = cos(re)
    else
        tmp = 0.5d0 * ((2.0d0 + (im * (1.0d0 + (im * (0.5d0 + (im * 0.16666666666666666d0)))))) - im)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if (im <= 8.5e+54) {
		tmp = Math.cos(re);
	} else {
		tmp = 0.5 * ((2.0 + (im * (1.0 + (im * (0.5 + (im * 0.16666666666666666)))))) - im);
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(re, im):
	tmp = 0
	if im <= 8.5e+54:
		tmp = math.cos(re)
	else:
		tmp = 0.5 * ((2.0 + (im * (1.0 + (im * (0.5 + (im * 0.16666666666666666)))))) - im)
	return tmp
function code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (im <= 8.5e+54)
		tmp = cos(re);
	else
		tmp = Float64(0.5 * Float64(Float64(2.0 + Float64(im * Float64(1.0 + Float64(im * Float64(0.5 + Float64(im * 0.16666666666666666)))))) - im));
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (im <= 8.5e+54)
		tmp = cos(re);
	else
		tmp = 0.5 * ((2.0 + (im * (1.0 + (im * (0.5 + (im * 0.16666666666666666)))))) - im);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[re_, im_] := If[LessEqual[im, 8.5e+54], N[Cos[re], $MachinePrecision], N[(0.5 * N[(N[(2.0 + N[(im * N[(1.0 + N[(im * N[(0.5 + N[(im * 0.16666666666666666), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - im), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;im \leq 8.5 \cdot 10^{+54}:\\
\;\;\;\;\cos re\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \left(\left(2 + im \cdot \left(1 + im \cdot \left(0.5 + im \cdot 0.16666666666666666\right)\right)\right) - im\right)\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if im < 8.4999999999999995e54

    1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(e^{-im} + e^{im}\right) \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in im around 0 65.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\cos re} \]

    if 8.4999999999999995e54 < im

    1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(e^{-im} + e^{im}\right) \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in im around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + -1 \cdot im\right)} + e^{im}\right) \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. neg-mul-1100.0%

        \[\leadsto \left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(\left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-im\right)}\right) + e^{im}\right) \]
      2. unsub-neg100.0%

        \[\leadsto \left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 - im\right)} + e^{im}\right) \]
    5. Simplified100.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 - im\right)} + e^{im}\right) \]
    6. Taylor expanded in re around 0 66.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot \left(\left(1 + e^{im}\right) - im\right)} \]
    7. Taylor expanded in im around 0 56.0%

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(2 + im \cdot \left(1 + im \cdot \left(0.5 + 0.16666666666666666 \cdot im\right)\right)\right)} - im\right) \]
    8. Step-by-step derivation
      1. *-commutative56.0%

        \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \left(\left(2 + im \cdot \left(1 + im \cdot \left(0.5 + \color{blue}{im \cdot 0.16666666666666666}\right)\right)\right) - im\right) \]
    9. Simplified56.0%

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(2 + im \cdot \left(1 + im \cdot \left(0.5 + im \cdot 0.16666666666666666\right)\right)\right)} - im\right) \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 44.7% accurate, 18.1× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 0.5 \cdot \left(\left(2 + im \cdot \left(1 + im \cdot \left(0.5 + im \cdot 0.16666666666666666\right)\right)\right) - im\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  0.5
  (- (+ 2.0 (* im (+ 1.0 (* im (+ 0.5 (* im 0.16666666666666666)))))) im)))
double code(double re, double im) {
	return 0.5 * ((2.0 + (im * (1.0 + (im * (0.5 + (im * 0.16666666666666666)))))) - im);
}
real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    code = 0.5d0 * ((2.0d0 + (im * (1.0d0 + (im * (0.5d0 + (im * 0.16666666666666666d0)))))) - im)
end function
public static double code(double re, double im) {
	return 0.5 * ((2.0 + (im * (1.0 + (im * (0.5 + (im * 0.16666666666666666)))))) - im);
}
def code(re, im):
	return 0.5 * ((2.0 + (im * (1.0 + (im * (0.5 + (im * 0.16666666666666666)))))) - im)
function code(re, im)
	return Float64(0.5 * Float64(Float64(2.0 + Float64(im * Float64(1.0 + Float64(im * Float64(0.5 + Float64(im * 0.16666666666666666)))))) - im))
end
function tmp = code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.5 * ((2.0 + (im * (1.0 + (im * (0.5 + (im * 0.16666666666666666)))))) - im);
end
code[re_, im_] := N[(0.5 * N[(N[(2.0 + N[(im * N[(1.0 + N[(im * N[(0.5 + N[(im * 0.16666666666666666), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - im), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
0.5 \cdot \left(\left(2 + im \cdot \left(1 + im \cdot \left(0.5 + im \cdot 0.16666666666666666\right)\right)\right) - im\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 100.0%

    \[\left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(e^{-im} + e^{im}\right) \]
  2. Add Preprocessing
  3. Taylor expanded in im around 0 78.1%

    \[\leadsto \left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + -1 \cdot im\right)} + e^{im}\right) \]
  4. Step-by-step derivation
    1. neg-mul-178.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(\left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-im\right)}\right) + e^{im}\right) \]
    2. unsub-neg78.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 - im\right)} + e^{im}\right) \]
  5. Simplified78.1%

    \[\leadsto \left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 - im\right)} + e^{im}\right) \]
  6. Taylor expanded in re around 0 46.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot \left(\left(1 + e^{im}\right) - im\right)} \]
  7. Taylor expanded in im around 0 44.2%

    \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(2 + im \cdot \left(1 + im \cdot \left(0.5 + 0.16666666666666666 \cdot im\right)\right)\right)} - im\right) \]
  8. Step-by-step derivation
    1. *-commutative44.2%

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \left(\left(2 + im \cdot \left(1 + im \cdot \left(0.5 + \color{blue}{im \cdot 0.16666666666666666}\right)\right)\right) - im\right) \]
  9. Simplified44.2%

    \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(2 + im \cdot \left(1 + im \cdot \left(0.5 + im \cdot 0.16666666666666666\right)\right)\right)} - im\right) \]
  10. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 47.9% accurate, 23.7× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 0.5 \cdot \left(\left(2 + im \cdot \left(1 + 0.5 \cdot im\right)\right) - im\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (* 0.5 (- (+ 2.0 (* im (+ 1.0 (* 0.5 im)))) im)))
double code(double re, double im) {
	return 0.5 * ((2.0 + (im * (1.0 + (0.5 * im)))) - im);
}
real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    code = 0.5d0 * ((2.0d0 + (im * (1.0d0 + (0.5d0 * im)))) - im)
end function
public static double code(double re, double im) {
	return 0.5 * ((2.0 + (im * (1.0 + (0.5 * im)))) - im);
}
def code(re, im):
	return 0.5 * ((2.0 + (im * (1.0 + (0.5 * im)))) - im)
function code(re, im)
	return Float64(0.5 * Float64(Float64(2.0 + Float64(im * Float64(1.0 + Float64(0.5 * im)))) - im))
end
function tmp = code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.5 * ((2.0 + (im * (1.0 + (0.5 * im)))) - im);
end
code[re_, im_] := N[(0.5 * N[(N[(2.0 + N[(im * N[(1.0 + N[(0.5 * im), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - im), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
0.5 \cdot \left(\left(2 + im \cdot \left(1 + 0.5 \cdot im\right)\right) - im\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 100.0%

    \[\left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(e^{-im} + e^{im}\right) \]
  2. Add Preprocessing
  3. Taylor expanded in im around 0 78.1%

    \[\leadsto \left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + -1 \cdot im\right)} + e^{im}\right) \]
  4. Step-by-step derivation
    1. neg-mul-178.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(\left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-im\right)}\right) + e^{im}\right) \]
    2. unsub-neg78.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 - im\right)} + e^{im}\right) \]
  5. Simplified78.1%

    \[\leadsto \left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 - im\right)} + e^{im}\right) \]
  6. Taylor expanded in im around 0 78.1%

    \[\leadsto \left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(\left(1 - im\right) + \color{blue}{\left(1 + im \cdot \left(1 + 0.5 \cdot im\right)\right)}\right) \]
  7. Taylor expanded in re around 0 48.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot \left(\left(2 + im \cdot \left(1 + 0.5 \cdot im\right)\right) - im\right)} \]
  8. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 12: 29.0% accurate, 308.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 1 \end{array} \]
(FPCore (re im) :precision binary64 1.0)
double code(double re, double im) {
	return 1.0;
}
real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    code = 1.0d0
end function
public static double code(double re, double im) {
	return 1.0;
}
def code(re, im):
	return 1.0
function code(re, im)
	return 1.0
end
function tmp = code(re, im)
	tmp = 1.0;
end
code[re_, im_] := 1.0
\begin{array}{l}

\\
1
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 100.0%

    \[\left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(e^{-im} + e^{im}\right) \]
  2. Add Preprocessing
  3. Taylor expanded in re around 0 63.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5} \cdot \left(e^{-im} + e^{im}\right) \]
  4. Taylor expanded in im around 0 48.0%

    \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(2 + {im}^{2}\right)} \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. +-commutative78.3%

      \[\leadsto \left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left({im}^{2} + 2\right)} \]
    2. unpow278.3%

      \[\leadsto \left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{im \cdot im} + 2\right) \]
    3. fma-define78.3%

      \[\leadsto \left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(im, im, 2\right)} \]
  6. Simplified48.0%

    \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(im, im, 2\right)} \]
  7. Taylor expanded in im around 0 31.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1} \]
  8. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 13: 9.2% accurate, 308.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 0.75 \end{array} \]
(FPCore (re im) :precision binary64 0.75)
double code(double re, double im) {
	return 0.75;
}
real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    code = 0.75d0
end function
public static double code(double re, double im) {
	return 0.75;
}
def code(re, im):
	return 0.75
function code(re, im)
	return 0.75
end
function tmp = code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.75;
end
code[re_, im_] := 0.75
\begin{array}{l}

\\
0.75
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 100.0%

    \[\left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(e^{-im} + e^{im}\right) \]
  2. Add Preprocessing
  3. Taylor expanded in re around 0 63.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5} \cdot \left(e^{-im} + e^{im}\right) \]
  4. Applied egg-rr9.4%

    \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{1.5} \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. metadata-eval9.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.75} \]
  6. Applied egg-rr9.4%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.75} \]
  7. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 14: 2.4% accurate, 308.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 0 \end{array} \]
(FPCore (re im) :precision binary64 0.0)
double code(double re, double im) {
	return 0.0;
}
real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    code = 0.0d0
end function
public static double code(double re, double im) {
	return 0.0;
}
def code(re, im):
	return 0.0
function code(re, im)
	return 0.0
end
function tmp = code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0;
end
code[re_, im_] := 0.0
\begin{array}{l}

\\
0
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 100.0%

    \[\left(0.5 \cdot \cos re\right) \cdot \left(e^{-im} + e^{im}\right) \]
  2. Add Preprocessing
  3. Applied egg-rr2.4%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left({1}^{\cos re}\right)} \]
  4. Step-by-step derivation
    1. pow-base-12.4%

      \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{1} \]
    2. metadata-eval2.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0} \]
  5. Simplified2.4%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0} \]
  6. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

?
herbie shell --seed 2024116 
(FPCore (re im)
  :name "math.cos on complex, real part"
  :precision binary64
  (* (* 0.5 (cos re)) (+ (exp (- im)) (exp im))))