Numeric.SpecFunctions:logGamma from math-functions-0.1.5.2, B

Percentage Accurate: 68.9% → 98.3%

Time: 9.4s

Alternatives: 11

Speedup: 2.1×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (+
  x
  (/
   (*
    y
    (+
     (* (+ (* z 0.0692910599291889) 0.4917317610505968) z)
     0.279195317918525))
   (+ (* (+ z 6.012459259764103) z) 3.350343815022304))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889d0) + 0.4917317610505968d0) * z) + 0.279195317918525d0)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103d0) * z) + 3.350343815022304d0))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / Float64(Float64(Float64(z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(N[(y * N[(N[(N[(N[(z * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision] + 0.4917317610505968), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] + 0.279195317918525), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(N[(z + 6.012459259764103), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] + 3.350343815022304), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 68.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (+
  x
  (/
   (*
    y
    (+
     (* (+ (* z 0.0692910599291889) 0.4917317610505968) z)
     0.279195317918525))
   (+ (* (+ z 6.012459259764103) z) 3.350343815022304))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889d0) + 0.4917317610505968d0) * z) + 0.279195317918525d0)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103d0) * z) + 3.350343815022304d0))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / Float64(Float64(Float64(z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(N[(y * N[(N[(N[(N[(z * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision] + 0.4917317610505968), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] + 0.279195317918525), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(N[(z + 6.012459259764103), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] + 3.350343815022304), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 98.3% accurate, 1.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.7 \cdot 10^{+18}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 9.5 \cdot 10^{-13}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.08333333333333323\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \frac{0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -2.7e+18)
   (+ x (* y 0.0692910599291889))
   (if (<= z 9.5e-13)
     (+ x (* y 0.08333333333333323))
     (+ x (* y (+ 0.0692910599291889 (/ 0.07512208616047561 z)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -2.7e+18) {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	} else if (z <= 9.5e-13) {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.08333333333333323);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 + (0.07512208616047561 / z)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-2.7d+18)) then
        tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889d0)
    else if (z <= 9.5d-13) then
        tmp = x + (y * 0.08333333333333323d0)
    else
        tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889d0 + (0.07512208616047561d0 / z)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -2.7e+18) {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	} else if (z <= 9.5e-13) {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.08333333333333323);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 + (0.07512208616047561 / z)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -2.7e+18:
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889)
	elif z <= 9.5e-13:
		tmp = x + (y * 0.08333333333333323)
	else:
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 + (0.07512208616047561 / z)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -2.7e+18)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * 0.0692910599291889));
	elseif (z <= 9.5e-13)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * 0.08333333333333323));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(0.0692910599291889 + Float64(0.07512208616047561 / z))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -2.7e+18)
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	elseif (z <= 9.5e-13)
		tmp = x + (y * 0.08333333333333323);
	else
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 + (0.07512208616047561 / z)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[z, -2.7e+18], N[(x + N[(y * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 9.5e-13], N[(x + N[(y * 0.08333333333333323), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(y * N[(0.0692910599291889 + N[(0.07512208616047561 / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if z < -2.7e18

   1. Initial program 43.7%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 43.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]

      2. *-commutative 43.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right) \cdot y}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x \]

      3. associate-/l* 55.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right) \cdot \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]

      4. fma-define 55.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525, \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]

      5. *-commutative 55.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525, \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      6. fma-define 55.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}, \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      7. fma-define 55.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      8. *-commutative 55.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      9. fma-define 55.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]

   3. Simplified 55.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot y + x} \]

   7. Simplified 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot y + x} \]

   if -2.7e18 < z < 9.49999999999999991e-13

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]

      2. *-commutative 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right) \cdot y}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x \]

      3. associate-/l* 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right) \cdot \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]

      4. fma-define 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525, \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]

      5. *-commutative 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525, \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      6. fma-define 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}, \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      7. fma-define 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      8. *-commutative 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      9. fma-define 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + 0.08333333333333323 \cdot y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.08333333333333323 \cdot y + x} \]

   7. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.08333333333333323 \cdot y + x} \]

   if 9.49999999999999991e-13 < z

   1. Initial program 46.9%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. remove-double-neg 46.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      2. associate-/l* 55.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-\left(-\color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}}\right)\right) \]

      3. distribute-rgt-neg-in 55.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)}\right) \]

      4. distribute-lft-neg-in 55.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)} \]

      5. distribute-lft-neg-in 55.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      6. distribute-rgt-neg-in 55.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      7. remove-double-neg 55.1%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} \]

      8. fma-define 55.1%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      9. fma-define 55.1%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      10. fma-define 55.1%

          \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 55.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 99.6%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.0692910599291889 + 0.07512208616047561 \cdot \frac{1}{z}\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 99.6%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \color{blue}{\frac{0.07512208616047561 \cdot 1}{z}}\right) \]

      2. metadata-eval 99.6%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \frac{\color{blue}{0.07512208616047561}}{z}\right) \]

   7. Simplified 99.6%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.0692910599291889 + \frac{0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.7 \cdot 10^{+18}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 9.5 \cdot 10^{-13}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.08333333333333323\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \frac{0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 99.6% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) + 0.279195317918525\right)}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304} \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{0.24180012482592123 - {z}^{2} \cdot 0.004801250986110448}{0.4917317610505968 - z \cdot 0.0692910599291889}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<=
      (/
       (*
        y
        (+
         (* z (+ (* z 0.0692910599291889) 0.4917317610505968))
         0.279195317918525))
       (+ (* z (+ z 6.012459259764103)) 3.350343815022304))
      INFINITY)
   (+
    x
    (*
     y
     (/
      (fma
       (/
        (- 0.24180012482592123 (* (pow z 2.0) 0.004801250986110448))
        (- 0.4917317610505968 (* z 0.0692910599291889)))
       z
       0.279195317918525)
      (fma (+ z 6.012459259764103) z 3.350343815022304))))
   (+ x (* y 0.0692910599291889))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (((y * ((z * ((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / ((z * (z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304)) <= ((double) INFINITY)) {
		tmp = x + (y * (fma(((0.24180012482592123 - (pow(z, 2.0) * 0.004801250986110448)) / (0.4917317610505968 - (z * 0.0692910599291889))), z, 0.279195317918525) / fma((z + 6.012459259764103), z, 3.350343815022304)));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(Float64(y * Float64(Float64(z * Float64(Float64(z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / Float64(Float64(z * Float64(z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304)) <= Inf)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(fma(Float64(Float64(0.24180012482592123 - Float64((z ^ 2.0) * 0.004801250986110448)) / Float64(0.4917317610505968 - Float64(z * 0.0692910599291889))), z, 0.279195317918525) / fma(Float64(z + 6.012459259764103), z, 3.350343815022304))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * 0.0692910599291889));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[N[(N[(y * N[(N[(z * N[(N[(z * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision] + 0.4917317610505968), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + 0.279195317918525), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(z * N[(z + 6.012459259764103), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + 3.350343815022304), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], Infinity], N[(x + N[(y * N[(N[(N[(N[(0.24180012482592123 - N[(N[Power[z, 2.0], $MachinePrecision] * 0.004801250986110448), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(0.4917317610505968 - N[(z * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * z + 0.279195317918525), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(z + 6.012459259764103), $MachinePrecision] * z + 3.350343815022304), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(y * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (/.f64 (*.f64 y (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 z #s(literal 692910599291889/10000000000000000 binary64)) #s(literal 307332350656623/625000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 11167812716741/40000000000000 binary64))) (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 z #s(literal 6012459259764103/1000000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 104698244219447/31250000000000 binary64))) < +inf.0

   1. Initial program 93.1%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. remove-double-neg 93.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      2. associate-/l* 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-\left(-\color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}}\right)\right) \]

      3. distribute-rgt-neg-in 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)}\right) \]

      4. distribute-lft-neg-in 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)} \]

      5. distribute-lft-neg-in 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      6. distribute-rgt-neg-in 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      7. remove-double-neg 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} \]

      8. fma-define 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      9. fma-define 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      10. fma-define 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{0.4917317610505968 + z \cdot 0.0692910599291889}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)} \]

      3. flip-+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\frac{0.4917317610505968 \cdot 0.4917317610505968 - \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889\right)}{0.4917317610505968 - z \cdot 0.0692910599291889}}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)} \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{\color{blue}{0.24180012482592123} - \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889\right)}{0.4917317610505968 - z \cdot 0.0692910599291889}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)} \]

      5. swap-sqr 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{0.24180012482592123 - \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 \cdot 0.0692910599291889\right)}}{0.4917317610505968 - z \cdot 0.0692910599291889}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)} \]

      6. pow2 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{0.24180012482592123 - \color{blue}{{z}^{2}} \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 \cdot 0.0692910599291889\right)}{0.4917317610505968 - z \cdot 0.0692910599291889}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)} \]

      7. metadata-eval 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{0.24180012482592123 - {z}^{2} \cdot \color{blue}{0.004801250986110448}}{0.4917317610505968 - z \cdot 0.0692910599291889}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)} \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 99.8%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\frac{0.24180012482592123 - {z}^{2} \cdot 0.004801250986110448}{0.4917317610505968 - z \cdot 0.0692910599291889}}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)} \]

   if +inf.0 < (/.f64 (*.f64 y (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 z #s(literal 692910599291889/10000000000000000 binary64)) #s(literal 307332350656623/625000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 11167812716741/40000000000000 binary64))) (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 z #s(literal 6012459259764103/1000000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 104698244219447/31250000000000 binary64)))

   1. Initial program 0.0%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 0.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]

      2. *-commutative 0.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right) \cdot y}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x \]

      3. associate-/l* 0.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right) \cdot \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]

      4. fma-define 0.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525, \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]

      5. *-commutative 0.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525, \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      6. fma-define 0.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}, \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      7. fma-define 0.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      8. *-commutative 0.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      9. fma-define 0.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]

   3. Simplified 0.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot y + x} \]

   7. Simplified 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot y + x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) + 0.279195317918525\right)}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304} \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{0.24180012482592123 - {z}^{2} \cdot 0.004801250986110448}{0.4917317610505968 - z \cdot 0.0692910599291889}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 99.6% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) + 0.279195317918525\right)}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304} \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+305}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \frac{0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<=
      (/
       (*
        y
        (+
         (* z (+ (* z 0.0692910599291889) 0.4917317610505968))
         0.279195317918525))
       (+ (* z (+ z 6.012459259764103)) 3.350343815022304))
      4e+305)
   (+
    x
    (*
     y
     (/
      (fma (fma z 0.0692910599291889 0.4917317610505968) z 0.279195317918525)
      (fma (+ z 6.012459259764103) z 3.350343815022304))))
   (+ x (* y (+ 0.0692910599291889 (/ 0.07512208616047561 z))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (((y * ((z * ((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / ((z * (z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304)) <= 4e+305) {
		tmp = x + (y * (fma(fma(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968), z, 0.279195317918525) / fma((z + 6.012459259764103), z, 3.350343815022304)));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 + (0.07512208616047561 / z)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(Float64(y * Float64(Float64(z * Float64(Float64(z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / Float64(Float64(z * Float64(z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304)) <= 4e+305)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(fma(fma(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968), z, 0.279195317918525) / fma(Float64(z + 6.012459259764103), z, 3.350343815022304))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(0.0692910599291889 + Float64(0.07512208616047561 / z))));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[N[(N[(y * N[(N[(z * N[(N[(z * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision] + 0.4917317610505968), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + 0.279195317918525), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(z * N[(z + 6.012459259764103), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + 3.350343815022304), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 4e+305], N[(x + N[(y * N[(N[(N[(z * 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968), $MachinePrecision] * z + 0.279195317918525), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(z + 6.012459259764103), $MachinePrecision] * z + 3.350343815022304), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(y * N[(0.0692910599291889 + N[(0.07512208616047561 / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (/.f64 (*.f64 y (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 z #s(literal 692910599291889/10000000000000000 binary64)) #s(literal 307332350656623/625000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 11167812716741/40000000000000 binary64))) (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 z #s(literal 6012459259764103/1000000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 104698244219447/31250000000000 binary64))) < 3.9999999999999998e305

   1. Initial program 98.2%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. remove-double-neg 98.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      2. associate-/l* 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-\left(-\color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}}\right)\right) \]

      3. distribute-rgt-neg-in 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)}\right) \]

      4. distribute-lft-neg-in 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)} \]

      5. distribute-lft-neg-in 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      6. distribute-rgt-neg-in 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      7. remove-double-neg 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} \]

      8. fma-define 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      9. fma-define 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      10. fma-define 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   if 3.9999999999999998e305 < (/.f64 (*.f64 y (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 z #s(literal 692910599291889/10000000000000000 binary64)) #s(literal 307332350656623/625000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 11167812716741/40000000000000 binary64))) (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 z #s(literal 6012459259764103/1000000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 104698244219447/31250000000000 binary64)))

   1. Initial program 0.9%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. remove-double-neg 0.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      2. associate-/l* 16.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-\left(-\color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}}\right)\right) \]

      3. distribute-rgt-neg-in 16.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)}\right) \]

      4. distribute-lft-neg-in 16.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)} \]

      5. distribute-lft-neg-in 16.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      6. distribute-rgt-neg-in 16.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      7. remove-double-neg 16.1%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} \]

      8. fma-define 16.1%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      9. fma-define 16.1%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      10. fma-define 16.1%

          \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 16.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 99.5%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.0692910599291889 + 0.07512208616047561 \cdot \frac{1}{z}\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 99.5%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \color{blue}{\frac{0.07512208616047561 \cdot 1}{z}}\right) \]

      2. metadata-eval 99.5%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \frac{\color{blue}{0.07512208616047561}}{z}\right) \]

   7. Simplified 99.5%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.0692910599291889 + \frac{0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) + 0.279195317918525\right)}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304} \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+305}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \frac{0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 99.3% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304\\ t_1 := z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;\frac{y \cdot \left(t\_1 + 0.279195317918525\right)}{t\_0} \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+305}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.279195317918525 \cdot \frac{1}{t\_0} + \frac{t\_1}{t\_0}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \frac{0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (+ (* z (+ z 6.012459259764103)) 3.350343815022304))
        (t_1 (* z (+ (* z 0.0692910599291889) 0.4917317610505968))))
   (if (<= (/ (* y (+ t_1 0.279195317918525)) t_0) 4e+305)
     (+ x (* y (+ (* 0.279195317918525 (/ 1.0 t_0)) (/ t_1 t_0))))
     (+ x (* y (+ 0.0692910599291889 (/ 0.07512208616047561 z)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = (z * (z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304;
	double t_1 = z * ((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968);
	double tmp;
	if (((y * (t_1 + 0.279195317918525)) / t_0) <= 4e+305) {
		tmp = x + (y * ((0.279195317918525 * (1.0 / t_0)) + (t_1 / t_0)));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 + (0.07512208616047561 / z)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = (z * (z + 6.012459259764103d0)) + 3.350343815022304d0
    t_1 = z * ((z * 0.0692910599291889d0) + 0.4917317610505968d0)
    if (((y * (t_1 + 0.279195317918525d0)) / t_0) <= 4d+305) then
        tmp = x + (y * ((0.279195317918525d0 * (1.0d0 / t_0)) + (t_1 / t_0)))
    else
        tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889d0 + (0.07512208616047561d0 / z)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = (z * (z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304;
	double t_1 = z * ((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968);
	double tmp;
	if (((y * (t_1 + 0.279195317918525)) / t_0) <= 4e+305) {
		tmp = x + (y * ((0.279195317918525 * (1.0 / t_0)) + (t_1 / t_0)));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 + (0.07512208616047561 / z)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	t_0 = (z * (z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304
	t_1 = z * ((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)
	tmp = 0
	if ((y * (t_1 + 0.279195317918525)) / t_0) <= 4e+305:
		tmp = x + (y * ((0.279195317918525 * (1.0 / t_0)) + (t_1 / t_0)))
	else:
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 + (0.07512208616047561 / z)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(z * Float64(z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304)
	t_1 = Float64(z * Float64(Float64(z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(Float64(y * Float64(t_1 + 0.279195317918525)) / t_0) <= 4e+305)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(Float64(0.279195317918525 * Float64(1.0 / t_0)) + Float64(t_1 / t_0))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(0.0692910599291889 + Float64(0.07512208616047561 / z))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = (z * (z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304;
	t_1 = z * ((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((y * (t_1 + 0.279195317918525)) / t_0) <= 4e+305)
		tmp = x + (y * ((0.279195317918525 * (1.0 / t_0)) + (t_1 / t_0)));
	else
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 + (0.07512208616047561 / z)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(z * N[(z + 6.012459259764103), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + 3.350343815022304), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$1 = N[(z * N[(N[(z * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision] + 0.4917317610505968), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(N[(y * N[(t$95$1 + 0.279195317918525), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / t$95$0), $MachinePrecision], 4e+305], N[(x + N[(y * N[(N[(0.279195317918525 * N[(1.0 / t$95$0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(t$95$1 / t$95$0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(y * N[(0.0692910599291889 + N[(0.07512208616047561 / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (/.f64 (*.f64 y (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 z #s(literal 692910599291889/10000000000000000 binary64)) #s(literal 307332350656623/625000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 11167812716741/40000000000000 binary64))) (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 z #s(literal 6012459259764103/1000000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 104698244219447/31250000000000 binary64))) < 3.9999999999999998e305

   1. Initial program 98.2%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 98.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]

      2. *-commutative 98.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right) \cdot y}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x \]

      3. associate-/l* 99.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right) \cdot \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]

      4. fma-define 99.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525, \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]

      5. *-commutative 99.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525, \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      6. fma-define 99.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}, \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      7. fma-define 99.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      8. *-commutative 99.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      9. fma-define 99.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \left(0.279195317918525 \cdot \frac{1}{3.350343815022304 + z \cdot \left(6.012459259764103 + z\right)} + \frac{z \cdot \left(0.4917317610505968 + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot z\right)}{3.350343815022304 + z \cdot \left(6.012459259764103 + z\right)}\right)} \]

   if 3.9999999999999998e305 < (/.f64 (*.f64 y (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 z #s(literal 692910599291889/10000000000000000 binary64)) #s(literal 307332350656623/625000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 11167812716741/40000000000000 binary64))) (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 z #s(literal 6012459259764103/1000000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 104698244219447/31250000000000 binary64)))

   1. Initial program 0.9%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. remove-double-neg 0.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      2. associate-/l* 16.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-\left(-\color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}}\right)\right) \]

      3. distribute-rgt-neg-in 16.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)}\right) \]

      4. distribute-lft-neg-in 16.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)} \]

      5. distribute-lft-neg-in 16.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      6. distribute-rgt-neg-in 16.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      7. remove-double-neg 16.1%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} \]

      8. fma-define 16.1%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      9. fma-define 16.1%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      10. fma-define 16.1%

          \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 16.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 99.5%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.0692910599291889 + 0.07512208616047561 \cdot \frac{1}{z}\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 99.5%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \color{blue}{\frac{0.07512208616047561 \cdot 1}{z}}\right) \]

      2. metadata-eval 99.5%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \frac{\color{blue}{0.07512208616047561}}{z}\right) \]

   7. Simplified 99.5%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.0692910599291889 + \frac{0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) + 0.279195317918525\right)}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304} \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+305}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.279195317918525 \cdot \frac{1}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304} + \frac{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \frac{0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 96.8% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304\\ \mathbf{if}\;\frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) + 0.279195317918525\right)}{t\_0} \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+305}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y \cdot 0.279195317918525 + z \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) + y \cdot 0.4917317610505968\right)}{t\_0}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \frac{0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (+ (* z (+ z 6.012459259764103)) 3.350343815022304)))
   (if (<=
        (/
         (*
          y
          (+
           (* z (+ (* z 0.0692910599291889) 0.4917317610505968))
           0.279195317918525))
         t_0)
        4e+305)
     (+
      x
      (/
       (+
        (* y 0.279195317918525)
        (* z (+ (* 0.0692910599291889 (* y z)) (* y 0.4917317610505968))))
       t_0))
     (+ x (* y (+ 0.0692910599291889 (/ 0.07512208616047561 z)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = (z * (z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304;
	double tmp;
	if (((y * ((z * ((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / t_0) <= 4e+305) {
		tmp = x + (((y * 0.279195317918525) + (z * ((0.0692910599291889 * (y * z)) + (y * 0.4917317610505968)))) / t_0);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 + (0.07512208616047561 / z)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = (z * (z + 6.012459259764103d0)) + 3.350343815022304d0
    if (((y * ((z * ((z * 0.0692910599291889d0) + 0.4917317610505968d0)) + 0.279195317918525d0)) / t_0) <= 4d+305) then
        tmp = x + (((y * 0.279195317918525d0) + (z * ((0.0692910599291889d0 * (y * z)) + (y * 0.4917317610505968d0)))) / t_0)
    else
        tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889d0 + (0.07512208616047561d0 / z)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = (z * (z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304;
	double tmp;
	if (((y * ((z * ((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / t_0) <= 4e+305) {
		tmp = x + (((y * 0.279195317918525) + (z * ((0.0692910599291889 * (y * z)) + (y * 0.4917317610505968)))) / t_0);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 + (0.07512208616047561 / z)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	t_0 = (z * (z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304
	tmp = 0
	if ((y * ((z * ((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / t_0) <= 4e+305:
		tmp = x + (((y * 0.279195317918525) + (z * ((0.0692910599291889 * (y * z)) + (y * 0.4917317610505968)))) / t_0)
	else:
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 + (0.07512208616047561 / z)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(z * Float64(z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(Float64(y * Float64(Float64(z * Float64(Float64(z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / t_0) <= 4e+305)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(Float64(y * 0.279195317918525) + Float64(z * Float64(Float64(0.0692910599291889 * Float64(y * z)) + Float64(y * 0.4917317610505968)))) / t_0));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(0.0692910599291889 + Float64(0.07512208616047561 / z))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = (z * (z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304;
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((y * ((z * ((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / t_0) <= 4e+305)
		tmp = x + (((y * 0.279195317918525) + (z * ((0.0692910599291889 * (y * z)) + (y * 0.4917317610505968)))) / t_0);
	else
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 + (0.07512208616047561 / z)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(z * N[(z + 6.012459259764103), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + 3.350343815022304), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(N[(y * N[(N[(z * N[(N[(z * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision] + 0.4917317610505968), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + 0.279195317918525), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / t$95$0), $MachinePrecision], 4e+305], N[(x + N[(N[(N[(y * 0.279195317918525), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * N[(N[(0.0692910599291889 * N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * 0.4917317610505968), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / t$95$0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(y * N[(0.0692910599291889 + N[(0.07512208616047561 / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (/.f64 (*.f64 y (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 z #s(literal 692910599291889/10000000000000000 binary64)) #s(literal 307332350656623/625000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 11167812716741/40000000000000 binary64))) (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 z #s(literal 6012459259764103/1000000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 104698244219447/31250000000000 binary64))) < 3.9999999999999998e305

   1. Initial program 98.2%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 98.2%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{0.279195317918525 \cdot y + z \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) + 0.4917317610505968 \cdot y\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

   if 3.9999999999999998e305 < (/.f64 (*.f64 y (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 z #s(literal 692910599291889/10000000000000000 binary64)) #s(literal 307332350656623/625000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 11167812716741/40000000000000 binary64))) (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 z #s(literal 6012459259764103/1000000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 104698244219447/31250000000000 binary64)))

   1. Initial program 0.9%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. remove-double-neg 0.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      2. associate-/l* 16.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-\left(-\color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}}\right)\right) \]

      3. distribute-rgt-neg-in 16.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)}\right) \]

      4. distribute-lft-neg-in 16.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)} \]

      5. distribute-lft-neg-in 16.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      6. distribute-rgt-neg-in 16.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      7. remove-double-neg 16.1%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} \]

      8. fma-define 16.1%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      9. fma-define 16.1%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      10. fma-define 16.1%

          \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 16.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 99.5%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.0692910599291889 + 0.07512208616047561 \cdot \frac{1}{z}\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 99.5%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \color{blue}{\frac{0.07512208616047561 \cdot 1}{z}}\right) \]

      2. metadata-eval 99.5%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \frac{\color{blue}{0.07512208616047561}}{z}\right) \]

   7. Simplified 99.5%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.0692910599291889 + \frac{0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) + 0.279195317918525\right)}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304} \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+305}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y \cdot 0.279195317918525 + z \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) + y \cdot 0.4917317610505968\right)}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \frac{0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 96.8% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) + 0.279195317918525\right)}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304}\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_0 \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+305}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0 + x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \frac{0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0
         (/
          (*
           y
           (+
            (* z (+ (* z 0.0692910599291889) 0.4917317610505968))
            0.279195317918525))
          (+ (* z (+ z 6.012459259764103)) 3.350343815022304))))
   (if (<= t_0 4e+305)
     (+ t_0 x)
     (+ x (* y (+ 0.0692910599291889 (/ 0.07512208616047561 z)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = (y * ((z * ((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / ((z * (z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304);
	double tmp;
	if (t_0 <= 4e+305) {
		tmp = t_0 + x;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 + (0.07512208616047561 / z)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = (y * ((z * ((z * 0.0692910599291889d0) + 0.4917317610505968d0)) + 0.279195317918525d0)) / ((z * (z + 6.012459259764103d0)) + 3.350343815022304d0)
    if (t_0 <= 4d+305) then
        tmp = t_0 + x
    else
        tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889d0 + (0.07512208616047561d0 / z)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = (y * ((z * ((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / ((z * (z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304);
	double tmp;
	if (t_0 <= 4e+305) {
		tmp = t_0 + x;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 + (0.07512208616047561 / z)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	t_0 = (y * ((z * ((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / ((z * (z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304)
	tmp = 0
	if t_0 <= 4e+305:
		tmp = t_0 + x
	else:
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 + (0.07512208616047561 / z)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(y * Float64(Float64(z * Float64(Float64(z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / Float64(Float64(z * Float64(z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_0 <= 4e+305)
		tmp = Float64(t_0 + x);
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(0.0692910599291889 + Float64(0.07512208616047561 / z))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = (y * ((z * ((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / ((z * (z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t_0 <= 4e+305)
		tmp = t_0 + x;
	else
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 + (0.07512208616047561 / z)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(y * N[(N[(z * N[(N[(z * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision] + 0.4917317610505968), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + 0.279195317918525), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(z * N[(z + 6.012459259764103), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + 3.350343815022304), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$0, 4e+305], N[(t$95$0 + x), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(y * N[(0.0692910599291889 + N[(0.07512208616047561 / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (/.f64 (*.f64 y (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 z #s(literal 692910599291889/10000000000000000 binary64)) #s(literal 307332350656623/625000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 11167812716741/40000000000000 binary64))) (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 z #s(literal 6012459259764103/1000000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 104698244219447/31250000000000 binary64))) < 3.9999999999999998e305

   1. Initial program 98.2%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   if 3.9999999999999998e305 < (/.f64 (*.f64 y (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 z #s(literal 692910599291889/10000000000000000 binary64)) #s(literal 307332350656623/625000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 11167812716741/40000000000000 binary64))) (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 z #s(literal 6012459259764103/1000000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 104698244219447/31250000000000 binary64)))

   1. Initial program 0.9%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. remove-double-neg 0.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      2. associate-/l* 16.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-\left(-\color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}}\right)\right) \]

      3. distribute-rgt-neg-in 16.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)}\right) \]

      4. distribute-lft-neg-in 16.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)} \]

      5. distribute-lft-neg-in 16.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      6. distribute-rgt-neg-in 16.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      7. remove-double-neg 16.1%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} \]

      8. fma-define 16.1%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      9. fma-define 16.1%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      10. fma-define 16.1%

          \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 16.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 99.5%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.0692910599291889 + 0.07512208616047561 \cdot \frac{1}{z}\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 99.5%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \color{blue}{\frac{0.07512208616047561 \cdot 1}{z}}\right) \]

      2. metadata-eval 99.5%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \frac{\color{blue}{0.07512208616047561}}{z}\right) \]

   7. Simplified 99.5%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.0692910599291889 + \frac{0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) + 0.279195317918525\right)}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304} \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+305}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) + 0.279195317918525\right)}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304} + x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \frac{0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 60.9% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -3.4 \cdot 10^{+20}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 0.08333333333333323\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1.2 \cdot 10^{+58}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1.5 \cdot 10^{+244}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 0.08333333333333323\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -3.4e+20)
   (* y 0.08333333333333323)
   (if (<= y 1.2e+58)
     x
     (if (<= y 1.5e+244) (* y 0.0692910599291889) (* y 0.08333333333333323)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -3.4e+20) {
		tmp = y * 0.08333333333333323;
	} else if (y <= 1.2e+58) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (y <= 1.5e+244) {
		tmp = y * 0.0692910599291889;
	} else {
		tmp = y * 0.08333333333333323;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= (-3.4d+20)) then
        tmp = y * 0.08333333333333323d0
    else if (y <= 1.2d+58) then
        tmp = x
    else if (y <= 1.5d+244) then
        tmp = y * 0.0692910599291889d0
    else
        tmp = y * 0.08333333333333323d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -3.4e+20) {
		tmp = y * 0.08333333333333323;
	} else if (y <= 1.2e+58) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (y <= 1.5e+244) {
		tmp = y * 0.0692910599291889;
	} else {
		tmp = y * 0.08333333333333323;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -3.4e+20:
		tmp = y * 0.08333333333333323
	elif y <= 1.2e+58:
		tmp = x
	elif y <= 1.5e+244:
		tmp = y * 0.0692910599291889
	else:
		tmp = y * 0.08333333333333323
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -3.4e+20)
		tmp = Float64(y * 0.08333333333333323);
	elseif (y <= 1.2e+58)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (y <= 1.5e+244)
		tmp = Float64(y * 0.0692910599291889);
	else
		tmp = Float64(y * 0.08333333333333323);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -3.4e+20)
		tmp = y * 0.08333333333333323;
	elseif (y <= 1.2e+58)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (y <= 1.5e+244)
		tmp = y * 0.0692910599291889;
	else
		tmp = y * 0.08333333333333323;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, -3.4e+20], N[(y * 0.08333333333333323), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, 1.2e+58], x, If[LessEqual[y, 1.5e+244], N[(y * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision], N[(y * 0.08333333333333323), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if y < -3.4e20 or 1.4999999999999999e244 < y

   1. Initial program 70.3%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 70.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]

      2. *-commutative 70.3%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right) \cdot y}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x \]

      3. associate-/l* 77.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right) \cdot \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]

      4. fma-define 77.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525, \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]

      5. *-commutative 77.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525, \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      6. fma-define 77.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}, \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      7. fma-define 77.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      8. *-commutative 77.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      9. fma-define 77.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]

   3. Simplified 77.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 75.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + 0.08333333333333323 \cdot y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 75.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.08333333333333323 \cdot y + x} \]

   7. Simplified 75.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.08333333333333323 \cdot y + x} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in y around inf 55.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.08333333333333323 \cdot y} \]

   if -3.4e20 < y < 1.2e58

   1. Initial program 77.2%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 77.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]

      2. *-commutative 77.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right) \cdot y}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x \]

      3. associate-/l* 77.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right) \cdot \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]

      4. fma-define 77.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525, \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]

      5. *-commutative 77.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525, \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      6. fma-define 77.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}, \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      7. fma-define 77.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      8. *-commutative 77.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      9. fma-define 77.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]

   3. Simplified 77.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 77.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if 1.2e58 < y < 1.4999999999999999e244

   1. Initial program 57.8%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 57.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]

      2. *-commutative 57.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right) \cdot y}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x \]

      3. associate-/l* 75.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right) \cdot \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]

      4. fma-define 75.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525, \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]

      5. *-commutative 75.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525, \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      6. fma-define 75.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}, \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      7. fma-define 75.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      8. *-commutative 75.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      9. fma-define 75.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]

   3. Simplified 75.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 75.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 75.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot y + x} \]

   7. Simplified 75.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot y + x} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in y around inf 57.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot y} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 68.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -3.4 \cdot 10^{+20}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 0.08333333333333323\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1.2 \cdot 10^{+58}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1.5 \cdot 10^{+244}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 0.08333333333333323\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 98.2% accurate, 1.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.7 \cdot 10^{+18} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 9.5 \cdot 10^{-13}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.08333333333333323\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -2.7e+18) (not (<= z 9.5e-13)))
   (+ x (* y 0.0692910599291889))
   (+ x (* y 0.08333333333333323))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -2.7e+18) || !(z <= 9.5e-13)) {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.08333333333333323);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-2.7d+18)) .or. (.not. (z <= 9.5d-13))) then
        tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889d0)
    else
        tmp = x + (y * 0.08333333333333323d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -2.7e+18) || !(z <= 9.5e-13)) {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.08333333333333323);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -2.7e+18) or not (z <= 9.5e-13):
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889)
	else:
		tmp = x + (y * 0.08333333333333323)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -2.7e+18) || !(z <= 9.5e-13))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * 0.0692910599291889));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * 0.08333333333333323));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -2.7e+18) || ~((z <= 9.5e-13)))
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	else
		tmp = x + (y * 0.08333333333333323);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -2.7e+18], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 9.5e-13]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(y * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(y * 0.08333333333333323), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -2.7e18 or 9.49999999999999991e-13 < z

   1. Initial program 45.1%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 45.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]

      2. *-commutative 45.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right) \cdot y}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x \]

      3. associate-/l* 54.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right) \cdot \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]

      4. fma-define 54.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525, \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]

      5. *-commutative 54.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525, \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      6. fma-define 54.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}, \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      7. fma-define 54.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      8. *-commutative 54.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      9. fma-define 54.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]

   3. Simplified 54.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 99.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot y + x} \]

   7. Simplified 99.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot y + x} \]

   if -2.7e18 < z < 9.49999999999999991e-13

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]

      2. *-commutative 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right) \cdot y}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x \]

      3. associate-/l* 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right) \cdot \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]

      4. fma-define 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525, \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]

      5. *-commutative 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525, \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      6. fma-define 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}, \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      7. fma-define 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      8. *-commutative 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      9. fma-define 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + 0.08333333333333323 \cdot y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.08333333333333323 \cdot y + x} \]

   7. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.08333333333333323 \cdot y + x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.7 \cdot 10^{+18} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 9.5 \cdot 10^{-13}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.08333333333333323\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 61.2% accurate, 1.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -4.4 \cdot 10^{+78} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 7.5 \cdot 10^{+57}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -4.4e+78) (not (<= y 7.5e+57))) (* y 0.0692910599291889) x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -4.4e+78) || !(y <= 7.5e+57)) {
		tmp = y * 0.0692910599291889;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-4.4d+78)) .or. (.not. (y <= 7.5d+57))) then
        tmp = y * 0.0692910599291889d0
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -4.4e+78) || !(y <= 7.5e+57)) {
		tmp = y * 0.0692910599291889;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -4.4e+78) or not (y <= 7.5e+57):
		tmp = y * 0.0692910599291889
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -4.4e+78) || !(y <= 7.5e+57))
		tmp = Float64(y * 0.0692910599291889);
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -4.4e+78) || ~((y <= 7.5e+57)))
		tmp = y * 0.0692910599291889;
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -4.4e+78], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 7.5e+57]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision], x]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -4.40000000000000028e78 or 7.5000000000000006e57 < y

   1. Initial program 65.7%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 65.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]

      2. *-commutative 65.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right) \cdot y}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x \]

      3. associate-/l* 79.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right) \cdot \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]

      4. fma-define 79.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525, \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]

      5. *-commutative 79.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525, \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      6. fma-define 79.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}, \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      7. fma-define 79.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      8. *-commutative 79.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      9. fma-define 79.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]

   3. Simplified 79.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 66.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 66.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot y + x} \]

   7. Simplified 66.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot y + x} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in y around inf 50.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot y} \]

   if -4.40000000000000028e78 < y < 7.5000000000000006e57

   1. Initial program 75.9%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 75.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]

      2. *-commutative 75.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right) \cdot y}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x \]

      3. associate-/l* 76.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right) \cdot \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]

      4. fma-define 76.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525, \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]

      5. *-commutative 76.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525, \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      6. fma-define 76.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}, \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      7. fma-define 76.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      8. *-commutative 76.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      9. fma-define 76.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]

   3. Simplified 76.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 74.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 65.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -4.4 \cdot 10^{+78} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 7.5 \cdot 10^{+57}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 79.0% accurate, 2.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 2.95 \cdot 10^{+247}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 0.08333333333333323\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 2.95e+247)
   (+ x (* y 0.0692910599291889))
   (* y 0.08333333333333323)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 2.95e+247) {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	} else {
		tmp = y * 0.08333333333333323;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 2.95d+247) then
        tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889d0)
    else
        tmp = y * 0.08333333333333323d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 2.95e+247) {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	} else {
		tmp = y * 0.08333333333333323;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 2.95e+247:
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889)
	else:
		tmp = y * 0.08333333333333323
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 2.95e+247)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * 0.0692910599291889));
	else
		tmp = Float64(y * 0.08333333333333323);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 2.95e+247)
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	else
		tmp = y * 0.08333333333333323;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, 2.95e+247], N[(x + N[(y * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(y * 0.08333333333333323), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 2.9500000000000001e247

   1. Initial program 71.9%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 71.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]

      2. *-commutative 71.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right) \cdot y}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x \]

      3. associate-/l* 76.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right) \cdot \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]

      4. fma-define 76.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525, \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]

      5. *-commutative 76.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525, \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      6. fma-define 76.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}, \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      7. fma-define 76.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      8. *-commutative 76.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      9. fma-define 76.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]

   3. Simplified 76.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 81.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 81.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot y + x} \]

   7. Simplified 81.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot y + x} \]

   if 2.9500000000000001e247 < y

   1. Initial program 83.0%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 83.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]

      2. *-commutative 83.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right) \cdot y}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x \]

      3. associate-/l* 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right) \cdot \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]

      4. fma-define 99.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525, \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]

      5. *-commutative 99.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525, \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      6. fma-define 99.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}, \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      7. fma-define 99.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      8. *-commutative 99.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      9. fma-define 99.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 85.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + 0.08333333333333323 \cdot y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 85.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.08333333333333323 \cdot y + x} \]

   7. Simplified 85.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.08333333333333323 \cdot y + x} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in y around inf 76.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.08333333333333323 \cdot y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 81.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 2.95 \cdot 10^{+247}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 0.08333333333333323\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 50.5% accurate, 21.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 72.4%

   \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 72.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]

   2. *-commutative 72.4%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right) \cdot y}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x \]

   3. associate-/l* 77.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right) \cdot \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]

   4. fma-define 77.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525, \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]

   5. *-commutative 77.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525, \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

   6. fma-define 77.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}, \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

   7. fma-define 77.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

   8. *-commutative 77.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

   9. fma-define 77.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]

3. Simplified 77.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 54.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Developer Target 1: 99.4% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \left(\frac{0.07512208616047561}{z} + 0.0692910599291889\right) \cdot y - \left(\frac{0.40462203869992125 \cdot y}{z \cdot z} - x\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;z < -8120153.652456675:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z < 6.576118972787377 \cdot 10^{+20}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0
         (-
          (* (+ (/ 0.07512208616047561 z) 0.0692910599291889) y)
          (- (/ (* 0.40462203869992125 y) (* z z)) x))))
   (if (< z -8120153.652456675)
     t_0
     (if (< z 6.576118972787377e+20)
       (+
        x
        (*
         (*
          y
          (+
           (* (+ (* z 0.0692910599291889) 0.4917317610505968) z)
           0.279195317918525))
         (/ 1.0 (+ (* (+ z 6.012459259764103) z) 3.350343815022304))))
       t_0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = (((0.07512208616047561 / z) + 0.0692910599291889) * y) - (((0.40462203869992125 * y) / (z * z)) - x);
	double tmp;
	if (z < -8120153.652456675) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (z < 6.576118972787377e+20) {
		tmp = x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) * (1.0 / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304)));
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = (((0.07512208616047561d0 / z) + 0.0692910599291889d0) * y) - (((0.40462203869992125d0 * y) / (z * z)) - x)
    if (z < (-8120153.652456675d0)) then
        tmp = t_0
    else if (z < 6.576118972787377d+20) then
        tmp = x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889d0) + 0.4917317610505968d0) * z) + 0.279195317918525d0)) * (1.0d0 / (((z + 6.012459259764103d0) * z) + 3.350343815022304d0)))
    else
        tmp = t_0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = (((0.07512208616047561 / z) + 0.0692910599291889) * y) - (((0.40462203869992125 * y) / (z * z)) - x);
	double tmp;
	if (z < -8120153.652456675) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (z < 6.576118972787377e+20) {
		tmp = x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) * (1.0 / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304)));
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	t_0 = (((0.07512208616047561 / z) + 0.0692910599291889) * y) - (((0.40462203869992125 * y) / (z * z)) - x)
	tmp = 0
	if z < -8120153.652456675:
		tmp = t_0
	elif z < 6.576118972787377e+20:
		tmp = x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) * (1.0 / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304)))
	else:
		tmp = t_0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(0.07512208616047561 / z) + 0.0692910599291889) * y) - Float64(Float64(Float64(0.40462203869992125 * y) / Float64(z * z)) - x))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z < -8120153.652456675)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (z < 6.576118972787377e+20)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) * Float64(1.0 / Float64(Float64(Float64(z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304))));
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = (((0.07512208616047561 / z) + 0.0692910599291889) * y) - (((0.40462203869992125 * y) / (z * z)) - x);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z < -8120153.652456675)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (z < 6.576118972787377e+20)
		tmp = x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) * (1.0 / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304)));
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(N[(N[(0.07512208616047561 / z), $MachinePrecision] + 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(N[(0.40462203869992125 * y), $MachinePrecision] / N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[Less[z, -8120153.652456675], t$95$0, If[Less[z, 6.576118972787377e+20], N[(x + N[(N[(y * N[(N[(N[(N[(z * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision] + 0.4917317610505968), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] + 0.279195317918525), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.0 / N[(N[(N[(z + 6.012459259764103), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] + 3.350343815022304), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$0]]]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024116 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Numeric.SpecFunctions:logGamma from math-functions-0.1.5.2, B"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (! :herbie-platform default (if (< z -324806146098267/40000000) (- (* (+ (/ 7512208616047561/100000000000000000 z) 692910599291889/10000000000000000) y) (- (/ (* 323697630959937/800000000000000 y) (* z z)) x)) (if (< z 657611897278737700000) (+ x (* (* y (+ (* (+ (* z 692910599291889/10000000000000000) 307332350656623/625000000000000) z) 11167812716741/40000000000000)) (/ 1 (+ (* (+ z 6012459259764103/1000000000000000) z) 104698244219447/31250000000000)))) (- (* (+ (/ 7512208616047561/100000000000000000 z) 692910599291889/10000000000000000) y) (- (/ (* 323697630959937/800000000000000 y) (* z z)) x)))))

  (+ x (/ (* y (+ (* (+ (* z 0.0692910599291889) 0.4917317610505968) z) 0.279195317918525)) (+ (* (+ z 6.012459259764103) z) 3.350343815022304))))