Optimisation.CirclePacking:place from circle-packing-0.1.0.4, H

Percentage Accurate: 100.0% → 100.0%

Time: 6.2s

Alternatives: 11

Speedup: 1.0×

• 20.9% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* (+ x y) (- 1.0 z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x + y) * (1.0 - z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x + y) * (1.0d0 - z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x + y) * (1.0 - z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x + y) * (1.0 - z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x + y) * Float64(1.0 - z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x + y) * (1.0 - z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* (+ x y) (- 1.0 z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x + y) * (1.0 - z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x + y) * (1.0d0 - z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x + y) * (1.0 - z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x + y) * (1.0 - z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x + y) * Float64(1.0 - z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x + y) * (1.0 - z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x + y\right) - z \cdot \left(x + y\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- (+ x y) (* z (+ x y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x + y) - (z * (x + y));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x + y) - (z * (x + y))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x + y) - (z * (x + y));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x + y) - (z * (x + y))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x + y) - Float64(z * Float64(x + y)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x + y) - (z * (x + y));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] - N[(z * N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. sub-neg 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(x + y\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-z\right)\right)} \]

   2. distribute-lft-in 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right) \cdot 1 + \left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(-z\right)} \]

   3. *-commutative 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 \cdot \left(x + y\right)} + \left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(-z\right) \]

   4. *-un-lft-identity 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)} + \left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(-z\right) \]

4. Applied egg-rr 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right) + \left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(-z\right)} \]

5. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \left(x + y\right) - z \cdot \left(x + y\right) \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 74.1% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := y \cdot \left(-z\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -20:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 6.3 \cdot 10^{+97}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(-z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* y (- z))))
   (if (<= z -20.0)
     t_0
     (if (<= z 1.0) (+ x y) (if (<= z 6.3e+97) (* x (- z)) t_0)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = y * -z;
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -20.0) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (z <= 1.0) {
		tmp = x + y;
	} else if (z <= 6.3e+97) {
		tmp = x * -z;
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = y * -z
    if (z <= (-20.0d0)) then
        tmp = t_0
    else if (z <= 1.0d0) then
        tmp = x + y
    else if (z <= 6.3d+97) then
        tmp = x * -z
    else
        tmp = t_0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = y * -z;
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -20.0) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (z <= 1.0) {
		tmp = x + y;
	} else if (z <= 6.3e+97) {
		tmp = x * -z;
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	t_0 = y * -z
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -20.0:
		tmp = t_0
	elif z <= 1.0:
		tmp = x + y
	elif z <= 6.3e+97:
		tmp = x * -z
	else:
		tmp = t_0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(y * Float64(-z))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -20.0)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (z <= 1.0)
		tmp = Float64(x + y);
	elseif (z <= 6.3e+97)
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(-z));
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = y * -z;
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -20.0)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (z <= 1.0)
		tmp = x + y;
	elseif (z <= 6.3e+97)
		tmp = x * -z;
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(y * (-z)), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[z, -20.0], t$95$0, If[LessEqual[z, 1.0], N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 6.3e+97], N[(x * (-z)), $MachinePrecision], t$95$0]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if z < -20 or 6.29999999999999997e97 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 98.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(x + y\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 98.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 98.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(x + y\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around 0 59.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 59.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot y\right) \cdot z} \]

      2. mul-1-neg 59.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} \cdot z \]

   8. Simplified 59.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot z} \]

   if -20 < z < 1

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 97.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 97.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]

   5. Simplified 97.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]

   if 1 < z < 6.29999999999999997e97

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 51.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 51.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x} \]

   5. Simplified 51.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around inf 51.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot z\right)} \cdot x \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 95.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)} \]

   8. Simplified 51.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)} \cdot x \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 78.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -20:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(-z\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 6.3 \cdot 10^{+97}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(-z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(-z\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 74.2% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.2 \cdot 10^{-5} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 6.2 \cdot 10^{-25}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(1 - z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -1.2e-5) (not (<= z 6.2e-25))) (* y (- 1.0 z)) (+ x y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1.2e-5) || !(z <= 6.2e-25)) {
		tmp = y * (1.0 - z);
	} else {
		tmp = x + y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-1.2d-5)) .or. (.not. (z <= 6.2d-25))) then
        tmp = y * (1.0d0 - z)
    else
        tmp = x + y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1.2e-5) || !(z <= 6.2e-25)) {
		tmp = y * (1.0 - z);
	} else {
		tmp = x + y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -1.2e-5) or not (z <= 6.2e-25):
		tmp = y * (1.0 - z)
	else:
		tmp = x + y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -1.2e-5) || !(z <= 6.2e-25))
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(1.0 - z));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -1.2e-5) || ~((z <= 6.2e-25)))
		tmp = y * (1.0 - z);
	else
		tmp = x + y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -1.2e-5], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 6.2e-25]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -1.2e-5 or 6.19999999999999989e-25 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 59.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(1 - z\right)} \]

   if -1.2e-5 < z < 6.19999999999999989e-25

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]

   5. Simplified 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 78.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.2 \cdot 10^{-5} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 6.2 \cdot 10^{-25}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(1 - z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 74.1% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -16.5 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(-z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -16.5) (not (<= z 1.0))) (* y (- z)) (+ x y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -16.5) || !(z <= 1.0)) {
		tmp = y * -z;
	} else {
		tmp = x + y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-16.5d0)) .or. (.not. (z <= 1.0d0))) then
        tmp = y * -z
    else
        tmp = x + y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -16.5) || !(z <= 1.0)) {
		tmp = y * -z;
	} else {
		tmp = x + y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -16.5) or not (z <= 1.0):
		tmp = y * -z
	else:
		tmp = x + y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -16.5) || !(z <= 1.0))
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(-z));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -16.5) || ~((z <= 1.0)))
		tmp = y * -z;
	else
		tmp = x + y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -16.5], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 1.0]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * (-z)), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -16.5 or 1 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 97.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(x + y\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 97.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 97.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(x + y\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around 0 58.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 58.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot y\right) \cdot z} \]

      2. mul-1-neg 58.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} \cdot z \]

   8. Simplified 58.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot z} \]

   if -16.5 < z < 1

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 97.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 97.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]

   5. Simplified 97.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 78.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -16.5 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(-z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 51.3% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x + y \leq -2 \cdot 10^{-226}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - x \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y - y \cdot z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (+ x y) -2e-226) (- x (* x z)) (- y (* y z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x + y) <= -2e-226) {
		tmp = x - (x * z);
	} else {
		tmp = y - (y * z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x + y) <= (-2d-226)) then
        tmp = x - (x * z)
    else
        tmp = y - (y * z)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x + y) <= -2e-226) {
		tmp = x - (x * z);
	} else {
		tmp = y - (y * z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (x + y) <= -2e-226:
		tmp = x - (x * z)
	else:
		tmp = y - (y * z)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(x + y) <= -2e-226)
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(x * z));
	else
		tmp = Float64(y - Float64(y * z));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x + y) <= -2e-226)
		tmp = x - (x * z);
	else
		tmp = y - (y * z);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision], -2e-226], N[(x - N[(x * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(y - N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (+.f64 x y) < -1.99999999999999984e-226

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-z\right)\right)} \]

      2. distribute-lft-in 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right) \cdot 1 + \left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(-z\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 \cdot \left(x + y\right)} + \left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(-z\right) \]

      4. *-un-lft-identity 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)} + \left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(-z\right) \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right) + \left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(-z\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 73.3%

      \[\leadsto \left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 73.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot x\right) \cdot z} \]

      2. mul-1-neg 73.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-x\right)} \cdot z \]

   7. Simplified 73.3%

      \[\leadsto \left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-x\right) \cdot z} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-lft-neg-out 73.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-x \cdot z\right)} \]

      2. unsub-neg 73.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right) - x \cdot z} \]

   9. Applied egg-rr 73.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right) - x \cdot z} \]

   10. Taylor expanded in y around 0 52.2%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - x \cdot z} \]

   if -1.99999999999999984e-226 < (+.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-z\right)\right)} \]

      2. distribute-lft-in 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right) \cdot 1 + \left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(-z\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 \cdot \left(x + y\right)} + \left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(-z\right) \]

      4. *-un-lft-identity 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)} + \left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(-z\right) \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right) + \left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(-z\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 58.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 58.2%

         \[\leadsto y + \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot y\right) \cdot z} \]

      2. mul-1-neg 58.2%

         \[\leadsto y + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} \cdot z \]

   7. Simplified 58.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + \left(-y\right) \cdot z} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-lft-neg-out 58.2%

         \[\leadsto y + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot z\right)} \]

      2. unsub-neg 58.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y - y \cdot z} \]

      3. *-commutative 58.2%

         \[\leadsto y - \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

   9. Applied egg-rr 58.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y - z \cdot y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 55.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x + y \leq -2 \cdot 10^{-226}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - x \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y - y \cdot z\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 61.0% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -7 \cdot 10^{-134}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - x \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(1 - z\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -7e-134) (- x (* x z)) (* y (- 1.0 z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -7e-134) {
		tmp = x - (x * z);
	} else {
		tmp = y * (1.0 - z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-7d-134)) then
        tmp = x - (x * z)
    else
        tmp = y * (1.0d0 - z)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -7e-134) {
		tmp = x - (x * z);
	} else {
		tmp = y * (1.0 - z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -7e-134:
		tmp = x - (x * z)
	else:
		tmp = y * (1.0 - z)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -7e-134)
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(x * z));
	else
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(1.0 - z));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -7e-134)
		tmp = x - (x * z);
	else
		tmp = y * (1.0 - z);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[x, -7e-134], N[(x - N[(x * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(y * N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -6.9999999999999997e-134

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-z\right)\right)} \]

      2. distribute-lft-in 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right) \cdot 1 + \left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(-z\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 \cdot \left(x + y\right)} + \left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(-z\right) \]

      4. *-un-lft-identity 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)} + \left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(-z\right) \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right) + \left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(-z\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 79.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 79.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot x\right) \cdot z} \]

      2. mul-1-neg 79.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-x\right)} \cdot z \]

   7. Simplified 79.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-x\right) \cdot z} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-lft-neg-out 79.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-x \cdot z\right)} \]

      2. unsub-neg 79.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right) - x \cdot z} \]

   9. Applied egg-rr 79.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right) - x \cdot z} \]

   10. Taylor expanded in y around 0 65.7%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - x \cdot z} \]

   if -6.9999999999999997e-134 < x

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 63.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(1 - z\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 61.0% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -7 \cdot 10^{-134}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(1 - z\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -7e-134) (* x (- 1.0 z)) (* y (- 1.0 z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -7e-134) {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z);
	} else {
		tmp = y * (1.0 - z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-7d-134)) then
        tmp = x * (1.0d0 - z)
    else
        tmp = y * (1.0d0 - z)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -7e-134) {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z);
	} else {
		tmp = y * (1.0 - z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -7e-134:
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z)
	else:
		tmp = y * (1.0 - z)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -7e-134)
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(1.0 - z));
	else
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(1.0 - z));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -7e-134)
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z);
	else
		tmp = y * (1.0 - z);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[x, -7e-134], N[(x * N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(y * N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -6.9999999999999997e-134

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 65.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 65.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x} \]

   5. Simplified 65.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x} \]

   if -6.9999999999999997e-134 < x

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 63.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(1 - z\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 64.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -7 \cdot 10^{-134}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(1 - z\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(1 - z\right) \cdot \left(x + y\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* (- 1.0 z) (+ x y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (1.0 - z) * (x + y);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (1.0d0 - z) * (x + y)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (1.0 - z) * (x + y);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (1.0 - z) * (x + y)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(1.0 - z) * Float64(x + y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (1.0 - z) * (x + y);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision] * N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \left(1 - z\right) \cdot \left(x + y\right) \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 31.3% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -4 \cdot 10^{-135}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (if (<= x -4e-135) x y))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -4e-135) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-4d-135)) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -4e-135) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -4e-135:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -4e-135)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = y;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -4e-135)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[x, -4e-135], x, y]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -4.0000000000000002e-135

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 45.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 45.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]

   5. Simplified 45.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around 0 32.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if -4.0000000000000002e-135 < x

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 53.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 53.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]

   5. Simplified 53.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around inf 31.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 50.6% accurate, 2.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x y))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + y;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + y
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + y;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + y

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + y)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + y;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 51.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 51.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]

5. Simplified 51.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]

6. Final simplification 51.0%

   \[\leadsto x + y \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 26.2% accurate, 7.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 51.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 51.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]

5. Simplified 51.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]

6. Taylor expanded in y around 0 26.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024116 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Optimisation.CirclePacking:place from circle-packing-0.1.0.4, H"
  :precision binary64
  (* (+ x y) (- 1.0 z)))