Graphics.Rasterific.Shading:$sradialGradientWithFocusShader from Rasterific-0.6.1, B

Percentage Accurate: 90.6% → 93.5%

Time: 11.4s

Alternatives: 6

Speedup: 0.6×

• 49.8% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot x - \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (- (* x x) (* (* y 4.0) (- (* z z) t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x * x) - ((y * 4.0) * ((z * z) - t));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (x * x) - ((y * 4.0d0) * ((z * z) - t))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x * x) - ((y * 4.0) * ((z * z) - t));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (x * x) - ((y * 4.0) * ((z * z) - t))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(x * x) - Float64(Float64(y * 4.0) * Float64(Float64(z * z) - t)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (x * x) - ((y * 4.0) * ((z * z) - t));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(y * 4.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 90.6% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot x - \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (- (* x x) (* (* y 4.0) (- (* z z) t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x * x) - ((y * 4.0) * ((z * z) - t));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (x * x) - ((y * 4.0d0) * ((z * z) - t))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x * x) - ((y * 4.0) * ((z * z) - t));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (x * x) - ((y * 4.0) * ((z * z) - t))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(x * x) - Float64(Float64(y * 4.0) * Float64(Float64(z * z) - t)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (x * x) - ((y * 4.0) * ((z * z) - t));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(y * 4.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 93.5% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \cdot z \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+301}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot -4\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-4 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot \frac{z}{t} + -1\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* z z) 4e+301)
   (fma x x (* (- (* z z) t) (* y -4.0)))
   (* -4.0 (* t (* y (+ (* z (/ z t)) -1.0))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z * z) <= 4e+301) {
		tmp = fma(x, x, (((z * z) - t) * (y * -4.0)));
	} else {
		tmp = -4.0 * (t * (y * ((z * (z / t)) + -1.0)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(z * z) <= 4e+301)
		tmp = fma(x, x, Float64(Float64(Float64(z * z) - t) * Float64(y * -4.0)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(-4.0 * Float64(t * Float64(y * Float64(Float64(z * Float64(z / t)) + -1.0))));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision], 4e+301], N[(x * x + N[(N[(N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision] * N[(y * -4.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(-4.0 * N[(t * N[(y * N[(N[(z * N[(z / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 z z) < 4.00000000000000021e301

   1. Initial program 97.2%

      \[x \cdot x - \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-neg 98.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, -\left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right)\right)} \]

      2. distribute-lft-neg-in 98.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right)}\right) \]

      3. *-commutative 98.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z - t\right) \cdot \left(-y \cdot 4\right)}\right) \]

      4. distribute-rgt-neg-in 98.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(-4\right)\right)}\right) \]

      5. metadata-eval 98.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot \color{blue}{-4}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 98.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot -4\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   if 4.00000000000000021e301 < (*.f64 z z)

   1. Initial program 67.5%

      \[x \cdot x - \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around inf 67.5%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot x - \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(-4 \cdot y + 4 \cdot \frac{y \cdot {z}^{2}}{t}\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 67.5%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot x - t \cdot \color{blue}{\left(4 \cdot \frac{y \cdot {z}^{2}}{t} + -4 \cdot y\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 67.5%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot x - t \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot {z}^{2}}{t} \cdot 4} + -4 \cdot y\right) \]

      3. *-commutative 67.5%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot x - t \cdot \left(\frac{y \cdot {z}^{2}}{t} \cdot 4 + \color{blue}{y \cdot -4}\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 67.5%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot x - t \cdot \left(\frac{y \cdot {z}^{2}}{t} \cdot 4 + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-4\right)}\right) \]

      5. distribute-rgt-neg-in 67.5%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot x - t \cdot \left(\frac{y \cdot {z}^{2}}{t} \cdot 4 + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot 4\right)}\right) \]

      6. distribute-lft-neg-in 67.5%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot x - t \cdot \left(\frac{y \cdot {z}^{2}}{t} \cdot 4 + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot 4}\right) \]

      7. distribute-rgt-out 67.5%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot x - t \cdot \color{blue}{\left(4 \cdot \left(\frac{y \cdot {z}^{2}}{t} + \left(-y\right)\right)\right)} \]

      8. unsub-neg 67.5%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot x - t \cdot \left(4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{y \cdot {z}^{2}}{t} - y\right)}\right) \]

      9. associate-/l* 67.5%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot x - t \cdot \left(4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{{z}^{2}}{t}} - y\right)\right) \]

   5. Simplified 67.5%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot x - \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(4 \cdot \left(y \cdot \frac{{z}^{2}}{t} - y\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around inf 74.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(\frac{{z}^{2}}{t} - 1\right)\right)\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 74.9%

         \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(\frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot z}}{t} - 1\right)\right)\right) \]

      2. *-un-lft-identity 74.9%

         \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(\frac{z \cdot z}{\color{blue}{1 \cdot t}} - 1\right)\right)\right) \]

      3. times-frac 85.8%

         \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{z}{1} \cdot \frac{z}{t}} - 1\right)\right)\right) \]

   8. Applied egg-rr 85.8%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{z}{1} \cdot \frac{z}{t}} - 1\right)\right)\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 95.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \cdot z \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+301}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot -4\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-4 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot \frac{z}{t} + -1\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 93.0% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \cdot z \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+301}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot x + \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(t - z \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-4 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot \frac{z}{t} + -1\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* z z) 4e+301)
   (+ (* x x) (* (* y 4.0) (- t (* z z))))
   (* -4.0 (* t (* y (+ (* z (/ z t)) -1.0))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z * z) <= 4e+301) {
		tmp = (x * x) + ((y * 4.0) * (t - (z * z)));
	} else {
		tmp = -4.0 * (t * (y * ((z * (z / t)) + -1.0)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z * z) <= 4d+301) then
        tmp = (x * x) + ((y * 4.0d0) * (t - (z * z)))
    else
        tmp = (-4.0d0) * (t * (y * ((z * (z / t)) + (-1.0d0))))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z * z) <= 4e+301) {
		tmp = (x * x) + ((y * 4.0) * (t - (z * z)));
	} else {
		tmp = -4.0 * (t * (y * ((z * (z / t)) + -1.0)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (z * z) <= 4e+301:
		tmp = (x * x) + ((y * 4.0) * (t - (z * z)))
	else:
		tmp = -4.0 * (t * (y * ((z * (z / t)) + -1.0)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(z * z) <= 4e+301)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * x) + Float64(Float64(y * 4.0) * Float64(t - Float64(z * z))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(-4.0 * Float64(t * Float64(y * Float64(Float64(z * Float64(z / t)) + -1.0))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z * z) <= 4e+301)
		tmp = (x * x) + ((y * 4.0) * (t - (z * z)));
	else
		tmp = -4.0 * (t * (y * ((z * (z / t)) + -1.0)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision], 4e+301], N[(N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(y * 4.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(t - N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(-4.0 * N[(t * N[(y * N[(N[(z * N[(z / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 z z) < 4.00000000000000021e301

   1. Initial program 97.2%

      \[x \cdot x - \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   if 4.00000000000000021e301 < (*.f64 z z)

   1. Initial program 67.5%

      \[x \cdot x - \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around inf 67.5%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot x - \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(-4 \cdot y + 4 \cdot \frac{y \cdot {z}^{2}}{t}\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 67.5%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot x - t \cdot \color{blue}{\left(4 \cdot \frac{y \cdot {z}^{2}}{t} + -4 \cdot y\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 67.5%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot x - t \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot {z}^{2}}{t} \cdot 4} + -4 \cdot y\right) \]

      3. *-commutative 67.5%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot x - t \cdot \left(\frac{y \cdot {z}^{2}}{t} \cdot 4 + \color{blue}{y \cdot -4}\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 67.5%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot x - t \cdot \left(\frac{y \cdot {z}^{2}}{t} \cdot 4 + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-4\right)}\right) \]

      5. distribute-rgt-neg-in 67.5%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot x - t \cdot \left(\frac{y \cdot {z}^{2}}{t} \cdot 4 + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot 4\right)}\right) \]

      6. distribute-lft-neg-in 67.5%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot x - t \cdot \left(\frac{y \cdot {z}^{2}}{t} \cdot 4 + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot 4}\right) \]

      7. distribute-rgt-out 67.5%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot x - t \cdot \color{blue}{\left(4 \cdot \left(\frac{y \cdot {z}^{2}}{t} + \left(-y\right)\right)\right)} \]

      8. unsub-neg 67.5%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot x - t \cdot \left(4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{y \cdot {z}^{2}}{t} - y\right)}\right) \]

      9. associate-/l* 67.5%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot x - t \cdot \left(4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{{z}^{2}}{t}} - y\right)\right) \]

   5. Simplified 67.5%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot x - \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(4 \cdot \left(y \cdot \frac{{z}^{2}}{t} - y\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around inf 74.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(\frac{{z}^{2}}{t} - 1\right)\right)\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 74.9%

         \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(\frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot z}}{t} - 1\right)\right)\right) \]

      2. *-un-lft-identity 74.9%

         \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(\frac{z \cdot z}{\color{blue}{1 \cdot t}} - 1\right)\right)\right) \]

      3. times-frac 85.8%

         \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{z}{1} \cdot \frac{z}{t}} - 1\right)\right)\right) \]

   8. Applied egg-rr 85.8%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{z}{1} \cdot \frac{z}{t}} - 1\right)\right)\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 94.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \cdot z \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+301}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot x + \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(t - z \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-4 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot \frac{z}{t} + -1\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 93.0% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot x \leq 3.2 \cdot 10^{+296}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot x + \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(t - z \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* x x) 3.2e+296) (+ (* x x) (* (* y 4.0) (- t (* z z)))) (* x x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x * x) <= 3.2e+296) {
		tmp = (x * x) + ((y * 4.0) * (t - (z * z)));
	} else {
		tmp = x * x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x * x) <= 3.2d+296) then
        tmp = (x * x) + ((y * 4.0d0) * (t - (z * z)))
    else
        tmp = x * x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x * x) <= 3.2e+296) {
		tmp = (x * x) + ((y * 4.0) * (t - (z * z)));
	} else {
		tmp = x * x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (x * x) <= 3.2e+296:
		tmp = (x * x) + ((y * 4.0) * (t - (z * z)))
	else:
		tmp = x * x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(x * x) <= 3.2e+296)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * x) + Float64(Float64(y * 4.0) * Float64(t - Float64(z * z))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * x);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x * x) <= 3.2e+296)
		tmp = (x * x) + ((y * 4.0) * (t - (z * z)));
	else
		tmp = x * x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision], 3.2e+296], N[(N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(y * 4.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(t - N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x x) < 3.1999999999999999e296

   1. Initial program 92.9%

      \[x \cdot x - \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   if 3.1999999999999999e296 < (*.f64 x x)

   1. Initial program 79.7%

      \[x \cdot x - \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 79.7%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot x - \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left({z}^{2} - t\right)\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 88.4%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot x - \color{blue}{0} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. --rgt-identity 88.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot x} \]

   7. Applied egg-rr 88.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 91.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot x \leq 3.2 \cdot 10^{+296}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot x + \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(t - z \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 45.4% accurate, 1.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq 5.6 \cdot 10^{+31}:\\ \;\;\;\;4 \cdot \left(t \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x 5.6e+31) (* 4.0 (* t y)) (* x x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= 5.6e+31) {
		tmp = 4.0 * (t * y);
	} else {
		tmp = x * x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= 5.6d+31) then
        tmp = 4.0d0 * (t * y)
    else
        tmp = x * x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= 5.6e+31) {
		tmp = 4.0 * (t * y);
	} else {
		tmp = x * x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= 5.6e+31:
		tmp = 4.0 * (t * y)
	else:
		tmp = x * x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= 5.6e+31)
		tmp = Float64(4.0 * Float64(t * y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * x);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= 5.6e+31)
		tmp = 4.0 * (t * y);
	else
		tmp = x * x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[x, 5.6e+31], N[(4.0 * N[(t * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < 5.60000000000000034e31

   1. Initial program 90.7%

      \[x \cdot x - \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around inf 35.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(t \cdot y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 35.3%

         \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot t\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 35.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(y \cdot t\right)} \]

   if 5.60000000000000034e31 < x

   1. Initial program 84.4%

      \[x \cdot x - \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 84.4%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot x - \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left({z}^{2} - t\right)\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 63.8%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot x - \color{blue}{0} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. --rgt-identity 63.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot x} \]

   7. Applied egg-rr 63.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 41.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq 5.6 \cdot 10^{+31}:\\ \;\;\;\;4 \cdot \left(t \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 66.4% accurate, 1.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot x - y \cdot \left(t \cdot -4\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (- (* x x) (* y (* t -4.0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x * x) - (y * (t * -4.0));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (x * x) - (y * (t * (-4.0d0)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x * x) - (y * (t * -4.0));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (x * x) - (y * (t * -4.0))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(x * x) - Float64(y * Float64(t * -4.0)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (x * x) - (y * (t * -4.0));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * N[(t * -4.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 89.3%

   \[x \cdot x - \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 62.5%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot x - \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \left(t \cdot y\right)} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 62.5%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot x - \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot y\right) \cdot -4} \]

   2. *-commutative 62.5%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot x - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot t\right)} \cdot -4 \]

   3. associate-*l* 62.5%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot x - \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(t \cdot -4\right)} \]

5. Simplified 62.5%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot x - \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(t \cdot -4\right)} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 41.0% accurate, 4.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (* x x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x * x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x * x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x * x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x * x

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x * x)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x * x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 89.3%

   \[x \cdot x - \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 89.3%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot x - \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left({z}^{2} - t\right)\right)} \]

5. Simplified 38.2%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot x - \color{blue}{0} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. --rgt-identity 38.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot x} \]

7. Applied egg-rr 38.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot x} \]
8. Add Preprocessing

Developer Target 1: 90.7% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot x - 4 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (- (* x x) (* 4.0 (* y (- (* z z) t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x * x) - (4.0 * (y * ((z * z) - t)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (x * x) - (4.0d0 * (y * ((z * z) - t)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x * x) - (4.0 * (y * ((z * z) - t)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (x * x) - (4.0 * (y * ((z * z) - t)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(x * x) - Float64(4.0 * Float64(y * Float64(Float64(z * z) - t))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (x * x) - (4.0 * (y * ((z * z) - t)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision] - N[(4.0 * N[(y * N[(N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024116 
(FPCore (x y z t)
  :name "Graphics.Rasterific.Shading:$sradialGradientWithFocusShader from Rasterific-0.6.1, B"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (! :herbie-platform default (- (* x x) (* 4 (* y (- (* z z) t)))))

  (- (* x x) (* (* y 4.0) (- (* z z) t))))