Language.Haskell.HsColour.ColourHighlight:unbase from hscolour-1.23

Percentage Accurate: 99.9% → 99.9%

Time: 7.5s

Alternatives: 8

Speedup: 1.0×

• 29.2% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (+ (* (+ (* x y) z) y) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((x * y) + z) * y) + t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (((x * y) + z) * y) + t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((x * y) + z) * y) + t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (((x * y) + z) * y) + t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + z) * y) + t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (((x * y) + z) * y) + t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision] + t), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (+ (* (+ (* x y) z) y) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((x * y) + z) * y) + t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (((x * y) + z) * y) + t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((x * y) + z) * y) + t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (((x * y) + z) * y) + t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + z) * y) + t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (((x * y) + z) * y) + t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision] + t), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.9% accurate, 0.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z\right), y, t\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (fma (fma x y z) y t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return fma(fma(x, y, z), y, t);
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return fma(fma(x, y, z), y, t)
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(x * y + z), $MachinePrecision] * y + t), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. fma-define 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x \cdot y + z, y, t\right)} \]

   2. fma-define 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z\right)}, y, t\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z\right), y, t\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 61.4% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := y \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -6.8 \cdot 10^{+35}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq -3.4 \cdot 10^{-143}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 6.5 \cdot 10^{-55}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 9.2 \cdot 10^{+111}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* y (* x y))))
   (if (<= y -6.8e+35)
     t_1
     (if (<= y -3.4e-143)
       (* y z)
       (if (<= y 6.5e-55) t (if (<= y 9.2e+111) (* y z) t_1))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = y * (x * y);
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -6.8e+35) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (y <= -3.4e-143) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else if (y <= 6.5e-55) {
		tmp = t;
	} else if (y <= 9.2e+111) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = y * (x * y)
    if (y <= (-6.8d+35)) then
        tmp = t_1
    else if (y <= (-3.4d-143)) then
        tmp = y * z
    else if (y <= 6.5d-55) then
        tmp = t
    else if (y <= 9.2d+111) then
        tmp = y * z
    else
        tmp = t_1
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = y * (x * y);
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -6.8e+35) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (y <= -3.4e-143) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else if (y <= 6.5e-55) {
		tmp = t;
	} else if (y <= 9.2e+111) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	t_1 = y * (x * y)
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -6.8e+35:
		tmp = t_1
	elif y <= -3.4e-143:
		tmp = y * z
	elif y <= 6.5e-55:
		tmp = t
	elif y <= 9.2e+111:
		tmp = y * z
	else:
		tmp = t_1
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = Float64(y * Float64(x * y))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -6.8e+35)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (y <= -3.4e-143)
		tmp = Float64(y * z);
	elseif (y <= 6.5e-55)
		tmp = t;
	elseif (y <= 9.2e+111)
		tmp = Float64(y * z);
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = y * (x * y);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -6.8e+35)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (y <= -3.4e-143)
		tmp = y * z;
	elseif (y <= 6.5e-55)
		tmp = t;
	elseif (y <= 9.2e+111)
		tmp = y * z;
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(y * N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[y, -6.8e+35], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[y, -3.4e-143], N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, 6.5e-55], t, If[LessEqual[y, 9.2e+111], N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if y < -6.8000000000000002e35 or 9.20000000000000008e111 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around inf 94.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(1 + \frac{y \cdot \left(z + x \cdot y\right)}{t}\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 94.2%

         \[\leadsto t \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{z + x \cdot y}{t}}\right) \]

      2. +-commutative 94.2%

         \[\leadsto t \cdot \left(1 + y \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + z}}{t}\right) \]

      3. *-commutative 94.2%

         \[\leadsto t \cdot \left(1 + y \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + z}{t}\right) \]

      4. fma-undefine 94.2%

         \[\leadsto t \cdot \left(1 + y \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, z\right)}}{t}\right) \]

   5. Simplified 94.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(1 + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, z\right)}{t}\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around 0 93.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in z around 0 80.4%

      \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y\right)} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 80.4%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot x\right)} \]

   9. Simplified 80.4%

      \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot x\right)} \]

   if -6.8000000000000002e35 < y < -3.39999999999999983e-143 or 6.50000000000000006e-55 < y < 9.20000000000000008e111

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around inf 87.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(1 + \frac{y \cdot \left(z + x \cdot y\right)}{t}\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 85.4%

         \[\leadsto t \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{z + x \cdot y}{t}}\right) \]

      2. +-commutative 85.4%

         \[\leadsto t \cdot \left(1 + y \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + z}}{t}\right) \]

      3. *-commutative 85.4%

         \[\leadsto t \cdot \left(1 + y \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + z}{t}\right) \]

      4. fma-undefine 85.4%

         \[\leadsto t \cdot \left(1 + y \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, z\right)}}{t}\right) \]

   5. Simplified 85.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(1 + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, z\right)}{t}\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around inf 50.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]

   if -3.39999999999999983e-143 < y < 6.50000000000000006e-55

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 70.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 68.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -6.8 \cdot 10^{+35}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq -3.4 \cdot 10^{-143}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 6.5 \cdot 10^{-55}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 9.2 \cdot 10^{+111}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 88.6% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -8 \cdot 10^{+113} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1.35 \cdot 10^{+66}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;t + y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t + y \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -8e+113) (not (<= z 1.35e+66)))
   (+ t (* y z))
   (+ t (* y (* x y)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -8e+113) || !(z <= 1.35e+66)) {
		tmp = t + (y * z);
	} else {
		tmp = t + (y * (x * y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-8d+113)) .or. (.not. (z <= 1.35d+66))) then
        tmp = t + (y * z)
    else
        tmp = t + (y * (x * y))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -8e+113) || !(z <= 1.35e+66)) {
		tmp = t + (y * z);
	} else {
		tmp = t + (y * (x * y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -8e+113) or not (z <= 1.35e+66):
		tmp = t + (y * z)
	else:
		tmp = t + (y * (x * y))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -8e+113) || !(z <= 1.35e+66))
		tmp = Float64(t + Float64(y * z));
	else
		tmp = Float64(t + Float64(y * Float64(x * y)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -8e+113) || ~((z <= 1.35e+66)))
		tmp = t + (y * z);
	else
		tmp = t + (y * (x * y));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -8e+113], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 1.35e+66]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(t + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(t + N[(y * N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -8e113 or 1.35e66 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 93.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \cdot y + t \]

   if -8e113 < z < 1.35e66

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 90.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y\right)} \cdot y + t \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 90.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot x\right)} \cdot y + t \]

   5. Simplified 90.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot x\right)} \cdot y + t \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 91.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -8 \cdot 10^{+113} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1.35 \cdot 10^{+66}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;t + y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t + y \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 87.5% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.85 \cdot 10^{-25} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 6 \cdot 10^{+99}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(z + x \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t + y \cdot z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -1.85e-25) (not (<= y 6e+99)))
   (* y (+ z (* x y)))
   (+ t (* y z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -1.85e-25) || !(y <= 6e+99)) {
		tmp = y * (z + (x * y));
	} else {
		tmp = t + (y * z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-1.85d-25)) .or. (.not. (y <= 6d+99))) then
        tmp = y * (z + (x * y))
    else
        tmp = t + (y * z)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -1.85e-25) || !(y <= 6e+99)) {
		tmp = y * (z + (x * y));
	} else {
		tmp = t + (y * z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -1.85e-25) or not (y <= 6e+99):
		tmp = y * (z + (x * y))
	else:
		tmp = t + (y * z)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -1.85e-25) || !(y <= 6e+99))
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(z + Float64(x * y)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(t + Float64(y * z));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -1.85e-25) || ~((y <= 6e+99)))
		tmp = y * (z + (x * y));
	else
		tmp = t + (y * z);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -1.85e-25], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 6e+99]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * N[(z + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(t + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -1.85000000000000004e-25 or 6.00000000000000029e99 < y

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around inf 92.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(1 + \frac{y \cdot \left(z + x \cdot y\right)}{t}\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 92.0%

         \[\leadsto t \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{z + x \cdot y}{t}}\right) \]

      2. +-commutative 92.0%

         \[\leadsto t \cdot \left(1 + y \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + z}}{t}\right) \]

      3. *-commutative 92.0%

         \[\leadsto t \cdot \left(1 + y \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + z}{t}\right) \]

      4. fma-undefine 92.0%

         \[\leadsto t \cdot \left(1 + y \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, z\right)}}{t}\right) \]

   5. Simplified 92.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(1 + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, z\right)}{t}\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around 0 91.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   if -1.85000000000000004e-25 < y < 6.00000000000000029e99

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 87.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \cdot y + t \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 89.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.85 \cdot 10^{-25} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 6 \cdot 10^{+99}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(z + x \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t + y \cdot z\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 79.5% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -3.6 \cdot 10^{+111} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 7 \cdot 10^{+111}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t + y \cdot z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -3.6e+111) (not (<= y 7e+111))) (* y (* x y)) (+ t (* y z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -3.6e+111) || !(y <= 7e+111)) {
		tmp = y * (x * y);
	} else {
		tmp = t + (y * z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-3.6d+111)) .or. (.not. (y <= 7d+111))) then
        tmp = y * (x * y)
    else
        tmp = t + (y * z)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -3.6e+111) || !(y <= 7e+111)) {
		tmp = y * (x * y);
	} else {
		tmp = t + (y * z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -3.6e+111) or not (y <= 7e+111):
		tmp = y * (x * y)
	else:
		tmp = t + (y * z)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -3.6e+111) || !(y <= 7e+111))
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(x * y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(t + Float64(y * z));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -3.6e+111) || ~((y <= 7e+111)))
		tmp = y * (x * y);
	else
		tmp = t + (y * z);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -3.6e+111], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 7e+111]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(t + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -3.6000000000000002e111 or 7.0000000000000004e111 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around inf 95.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(1 + \frac{y \cdot \left(z + x \cdot y\right)}{t}\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 95.4%

         \[\leadsto t \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{z + x \cdot y}{t}}\right) \]

      2. +-commutative 95.4%

         \[\leadsto t \cdot \left(1 + y \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + z}}{t}\right) \]

      3. *-commutative 95.4%

         \[\leadsto t \cdot \left(1 + y \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + z}{t}\right) \]

      4. fma-undefine 95.4%

         \[\leadsto t \cdot \left(1 + y \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, z\right)}}{t}\right) \]

   5. Simplified 95.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(1 + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, z\right)}{t}\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in z around 0 88.5%

      \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y\right)} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 88.5%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot x\right)} \]

   9. Simplified 88.5%

      \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot x\right)} \]

   if -3.6000000000000002e111 < y < 7.0000000000000004e111

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 83.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \cdot y + t \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 85.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -3.6 \cdot 10^{+111} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 7 \cdot 10^{+111}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t + y \cdot z\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 51.5% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -22 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 7.5 \cdot 10^{+54}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -22.0) (not (<= z 7.5e+54))) (* y z) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -22.0) || !(z <= 7.5e+54)) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else {
		tmp = t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-22.0d0)) .or. (.not. (z <= 7.5d+54))) then
        tmp = y * z
    else
        tmp = t
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -22.0) || !(z <= 7.5e+54)) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else {
		tmp = t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -22.0) or not (z <= 7.5e+54):
		tmp = y * z
	else:
		tmp = t
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -22.0) || !(z <= 7.5e+54))
		tmp = Float64(y * z);
	else
		tmp = t;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -22.0) || ~((z <= 7.5e+54)))
		tmp = y * z;
	else
		tmp = t;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -22.0], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 7.5e+54]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision], t]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -22 or 7.50000000000000042e54 < z

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around inf 89.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(1 + \frac{y \cdot \left(z + x \cdot y\right)}{t}\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 81.9%

         \[\leadsto t \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{z + x \cdot y}{t}}\right) \]

      2. +-commutative 81.9%

         \[\leadsto t \cdot \left(1 + y \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + z}}{t}\right) \]

      3. *-commutative 81.9%

         \[\leadsto t \cdot \left(1 + y \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + z}{t}\right) \]

      4. fma-undefine 81.9%

         \[\leadsto t \cdot \left(1 + y \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, z\right)}}{t}\right) \]

   5. Simplified 81.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(1 + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, z\right)}{t}\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around inf 63.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]

   if -22 < z < 7.50000000000000042e54

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 45.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 54.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -22 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 7.5 \cdot 10^{+54}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ t + y \cdot \left(z + x \cdot y\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (+ t (* y (+ z (* x y)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return t + (y * (z + (x * y)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = t + (y * (z + (x * y)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return t + (y * (z + (x * y)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return t + (y * (z + (x * y)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(t + Float64(y * Float64(z + Float64(x * y))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = t + (y * (z + (x * y)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(t + N[(y * N[(z + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto t + y \cdot \left(z + x \cdot y\right) \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 38.8% accurate, 9.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 t)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return t
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := t

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 34.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024116 
(FPCore (x y z t)
  :name "Language.Haskell.HsColour.ColourHighlight:unbase from hscolour-1.23"
  :precision binary64
  (+ (* (+ (* x y) z) y) t))