Diagrams.Solve.Polynomial:cubForm from diagrams-solve-0.1, A

Percentage Accurate: 95.2% → 98.6%

Time: 44.8s

Alternatives: 11

Speedup: 0.8×

• 26.9% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (- (* x 2.0) (* (* (* y 9.0) z) t)) (* (* a 27.0) b)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x * 2.0) - (((y * 9.0) * z) * t)) + ((a * 27.0) * b);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = ((x * 2.0d0) - (((y * 9.0d0) * z) * t)) + ((a * 27.0d0) * b)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x * 2.0) - (((y * 9.0) * z) * t)) + ((a * 27.0) * b);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return ((x * 2.0) - (((y * 9.0) * z) * t)) + ((a * 27.0) * b)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x * 2.0) - Float64(Float64(Float64(y * 9.0) * z) * t)) + Float64(Float64(a * 27.0) * b))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = ((x * 2.0) - (((y * 9.0) * z) * t)) + ((a * 27.0) * b);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(N[(y * 9.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * 27.0), $MachinePrecision] * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 95.2% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (- (* x 2.0) (* (* (* y 9.0) z) t)) (* (* a 27.0) b)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x * 2.0) - (((y * 9.0) * z) * t)) + ((a * 27.0) * b);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = ((x * 2.0d0) - (((y * 9.0d0) * z) * t)) + ((a * 27.0d0) * b)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x * 2.0) - (((y * 9.0) * z) * t)) + ((a * 27.0) * b);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return ((x * 2.0) - (((y * 9.0) * z) * t)) + ((a * 27.0) * b)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x * 2.0) - Float64(Float64(Float64(y * 9.0) * z) * t)) + Float64(Float64(a * 27.0) * b))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = ((x * 2.0) - (((y * 9.0) * z) * t)) + ((a * 27.0) * b);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(N[(y * 9.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * 27.0), $MachinePrecision] * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 98.6% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b])\\\\ [x, y, z, t, a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq 9 \cdot 10^{-93}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2, \frac{x}{t}, 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot \frac{b}{t}\right)\right) + \left(z \cdot y\right) \cdot -9\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z 9e-93)
   (+ (- (* x 2.0) (* (* y 9.0) (* z t))) (* a (* 27.0 b)))
   (* t (+ (fma 2.0 (/ x t) (* 27.0 (* a (/ b t)))) (* (* z y) -9.0)))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b);
assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= 9e-93) {
		tmp = ((x * 2.0) - ((y * 9.0) * (z * t))) + (a * (27.0 * b));
	} else {
		tmp = t * (fma(2.0, (x / t), (27.0 * (a * (b / t)))) + ((z * y) * -9.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
x, y, z, t, a, b = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= 9e-93)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(x * 2.0) - Float64(Float64(y * 9.0) * Float64(z * t))) + Float64(a * Float64(27.0 * b)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(t * Float64(fma(2.0, Float64(x / t), Float64(27.0 * Float64(a * Float64(b / t)))) + Float64(Float64(z * y) * -9.0)));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[z, 9e-93], N[(N[(N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(y * 9.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * N[(27.0 * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(t * N[(N[(2.0 * N[(x / t), $MachinePrecision] + N[(27.0 * N[(a * N[(b / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision] * -9.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < 9.0000000000000004e-93

   1. Initial program 94.5%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 94.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      2. sub-neg 94.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      3. associate-*l* 97.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      4. associate-*l* 97.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 97.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   if 9.0000000000000004e-93 < z

   1. Initial program 94.7%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 94.7%

      \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(9 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

   4. Taylor expanded in t around inf 81.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(\left(2 \cdot \frac{x}{t} + 27 \cdot \frac{a \cdot b}{t}\right) - 9 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. cancel-sign-sub-inv 81.2%

         \[\leadsto t \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(2 \cdot \frac{x}{t} + 27 \cdot \frac{a \cdot b}{t}\right) + \left(-9\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

      2. metadata-eval 81.2%

         \[\leadsto t \cdot \left(\left(2 \cdot \frac{x}{t} + 27 \cdot \frac{a \cdot b}{t}\right) + \color{blue}{-9} \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right) \]

      3. fma-define 81.2%

         \[\leadsto t \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, \frac{x}{t}, 27 \cdot \frac{a \cdot b}{t}\right)} + -9 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right) \]

      4. associate-/l* 77.2%

         \[\leadsto t \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2, \frac{x}{t}, 27 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot \frac{b}{t}\right)}\right) + -9 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right) \]

      5. *-commutative 77.2%

         \[\leadsto t \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2, \frac{x}{t}, 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot \frac{b}{t}\right)\right) + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot -9}\right) \]

   6. Simplified 77.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2, \frac{x}{t}, 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot \frac{b}{t}\right)\right) + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot -9\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 91.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq 9 \cdot 10^{-93}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2, \frac{x}{t}, 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot \frac{b}{t}\right)\right) + \left(z \cdot y\right) \cdot -9\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 98.2% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b])\\\\ [x, y, z, t, a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := z \cdot \left(y \cdot 9\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_1 \leq 10^{+97}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot 2 - t \cdot t\_1\right) + b \cdot \left(a \cdot 27\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* z (* y 9.0))))
   (if (<= t_1 1e+97)
     (+ (- (* x 2.0) (* t t_1)) (* b (* a 27.0)))
     (+ (- (* x 2.0) (* (* y 9.0) (* z t))) (* a (* 27.0 b))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b);
assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = z * (y * 9.0);
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= 1e+97) {
		tmp = ((x * 2.0) - (t * t_1)) + (b * (a * 27.0));
	} else {
		tmp = ((x * 2.0) - ((y * 9.0) * (z * t))) + (a * (27.0 * b));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = z * (y * 9.0d0)
    if (t_1 <= 1d+97) then
        tmp = ((x * 2.0d0) - (t * t_1)) + (b * (a * 27.0d0))
    else
        tmp = ((x * 2.0d0) - ((y * 9.0d0) * (z * t))) + (a * (27.0d0 * b))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b;
assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = z * (y * 9.0);
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= 1e+97) {
		tmp = ((x * 2.0) - (t * t_1)) + (b * (a * 27.0));
	} else {
		tmp = ((x * 2.0) - ((y * 9.0) * (z * t))) + (a * (27.0 * b));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
[x, y, z, t, a, b] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	t_1 = z * (y * 9.0)
	tmp = 0
	if t_1 <= 1e+97:
		tmp = ((x * 2.0) - (t * t_1)) + (b * (a * 27.0))
	else:
		tmp = ((x * 2.0) - ((y * 9.0) * (z * t))) + (a * (27.0 * b))
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
x, y, z, t, a, b = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64(z * Float64(y * 9.0))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_1 <= 1e+97)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(x * 2.0) - Float64(t * t_1)) + Float64(b * Float64(a * 27.0)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(x * 2.0) - Float64(Float64(y * 9.0) * Float64(z * t))) + Float64(a * Float64(27.0 * b)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])){:}
x, y, z, t, a, b = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = z * (y * 9.0);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t_1 <= 1e+97)
		tmp = ((x * 2.0) - (t * t_1)) + (b * (a * 27.0));
	else
		tmp = ((x * 2.0) - ((y * 9.0) * (z * t))) + (a * (27.0 * b));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(z * N[(y * 9.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$1, 1e+97], N[(N[(N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] - N[(t * t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(b * N[(a * 27.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(y * 9.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * N[(27.0 * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 (*.f64 y #s(literal 9 binary64)) z) < 1.0000000000000001e97

   1. Initial program 96.2%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   if 1.0000000000000001e97 < (*.f64 (*.f64 y #s(literal 9 binary64)) z)

   1. Initial program 85.4%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 85.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      2. sub-neg 85.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      3. associate-*l* 89.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      4. associate-*l* 89.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 89.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 95.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \cdot \left(y \cdot 9\right) \leq 10^{+97}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot 2 - t \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(y \cdot 9\right)\right)\right) + b \cdot \left(a \cdot 27\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 48.4% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b])\\\\ [x, y, z, t, a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -1.5 \cdot 10^{+15}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq -7.8 \cdot 10^{-62}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq -1.02 \cdot 10^{-151}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot y\right) \cdot -9\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 6.5 \cdot 10^{-36}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* 27.0 (* a b))))
   (if (<= a -1.5e+15)
     t_1
     (if (<= a -7.8e-62)
       (* x 2.0)
       (if (<= a -1.02e-151)
         (* t (* (* z y) -9.0))
         (if (<= a 6.5e-36) (* x 2.0) t_1))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b);
assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = 27.0 * (a * b);
	double tmp;
	if (a <= -1.5e+15) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (a <= -7.8e-62) {
		tmp = x * 2.0;
	} else if (a <= -1.02e-151) {
		tmp = t * ((z * y) * -9.0);
	} else if (a <= 6.5e-36) {
		tmp = x * 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = 27.0d0 * (a * b)
    if (a <= (-1.5d+15)) then
        tmp = t_1
    else if (a <= (-7.8d-62)) then
        tmp = x * 2.0d0
    else if (a <= (-1.02d-151)) then
        tmp = t * ((z * y) * (-9.0d0))
    else if (a <= 6.5d-36) then
        tmp = x * 2.0d0
    else
        tmp = t_1
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b;
assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = 27.0 * (a * b);
	double tmp;
	if (a <= -1.5e+15) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (a <= -7.8e-62) {
		tmp = x * 2.0;
	} else if (a <= -1.02e-151) {
		tmp = t * ((z * y) * -9.0);
	} else if (a <= 6.5e-36) {
		tmp = x * 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
[x, y, z, t, a, b] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	t_1 = 27.0 * (a * b)
	tmp = 0
	if a <= -1.5e+15:
		tmp = t_1
	elif a <= -7.8e-62:
		tmp = x * 2.0
	elif a <= -1.02e-151:
		tmp = t * ((z * y) * -9.0)
	elif a <= 6.5e-36:
		tmp = x * 2.0
	else:
		tmp = t_1
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
x, y, z, t, a, b = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64(27.0 * Float64(a * b))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (a <= -1.5e+15)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (a <= -7.8e-62)
		tmp = Float64(x * 2.0);
	elseif (a <= -1.02e-151)
		tmp = Float64(t * Float64(Float64(z * y) * -9.0));
	elseif (a <= 6.5e-36)
		tmp = Float64(x * 2.0);
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])){:}
x, y, z, t, a, b = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = 27.0 * (a * b);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (a <= -1.5e+15)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (a <= -7.8e-62)
		tmp = x * 2.0;
	elseif (a <= -1.02e-151)
		tmp = t * ((z * y) * -9.0);
	elseif (a <= 6.5e-36)
		tmp = x * 2.0;
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(27.0 * N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[a, -1.5e+15], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[a, -7.8e-62], N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[a, -1.02e-151], N[(t * N[(N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision] * -9.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[a, 6.5e-36], N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if a < -1.5e15 or 6.50000000000000012e-36 < a

   1. Initial program 95.2%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 95.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      2. sub-neg 95.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      3. associate-*l* 93.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      4. associate-*l* 93.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 93.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around inf 52.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]

   if -1.5e15 < a < -7.8000000000000007e-62 or -1.0200000000000001e-151 < a < 6.50000000000000012e-36

   1. Initial program 93.2%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 93.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      2. sub-neg 93.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      3. associate-*l* 97.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      4. associate-*l* 97.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 97.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 53.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot x} \]

   if -7.8000000000000007e-62 < a < -1.0200000000000001e-151

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      2. sub-neg 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      3. associate-*l* 93.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      4. associate-*l* 93.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 93.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in t around inf 93.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(\left(2 \cdot \frac{x}{t} + 27 \cdot \frac{a \cdot b}{t}\right) - 9 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around inf 54.2%

      \[\leadsto t \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-9 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 53.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -1.5 \cdot 10^{+15}:\\ \;\;\;\;27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq -7.8 \cdot 10^{-62}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq -1.02 \cdot 10^{-151}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot y\right) \cdot -9\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 6.5 \cdot 10^{-36}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 78.9% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b])\\\\ [x, y, z, t, a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -9 \cdot 10^{+39}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 2 + t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 460000000:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1 - 9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(z \cdot y\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 2 - y \cdot \left(9 \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* 27.0 (* a b))))
   (if (<= x -9e+39)
     (+ (* x 2.0) t_1)
     (if (<= x 460000000.0)
       (- t_1 (* 9.0 (* t (* z y))))
       (- (* x 2.0) (* y (* 9.0 (* z t))))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b);
assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = 27.0 * (a * b);
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -9e+39) {
		tmp = (x * 2.0) + t_1;
	} else if (x <= 460000000.0) {
		tmp = t_1 - (9.0 * (t * (z * y)));
	} else {
		tmp = (x * 2.0) - (y * (9.0 * (z * t)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = 27.0d0 * (a * b)
    if (x <= (-9d+39)) then
        tmp = (x * 2.0d0) + t_1
    else if (x <= 460000000.0d0) then
        tmp = t_1 - (9.0d0 * (t * (z * y)))
    else
        tmp = (x * 2.0d0) - (y * (9.0d0 * (z * t)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b;
assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = 27.0 * (a * b);
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -9e+39) {
		tmp = (x * 2.0) + t_1;
	} else if (x <= 460000000.0) {
		tmp = t_1 - (9.0 * (t * (z * y)));
	} else {
		tmp = (x * 2.0) - (y * (9.0 * (z * t)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
[x, y, z, t, a, b] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	t_1 = 27.0 * (a * b)
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -9e+39:
		tmp = (x * 2.0) + t_1
	elif x <= 460000000.0:
		tmp = t_1 - (9.0 * (t * (z * y)))
	else:
		tmp = (x * 2.0) - (y * (9.0 * (z * t)))
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
x, y, z, t, a, b = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64(27.0 * Float64(a * b))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -9e+39)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * 2.0) + t_1);
	elseif (x <= 460000000.0)
		tmp = Float64(t_1 - Float64(9.0 * Float64(t * Float64(z * y))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * 2.0) - Float64(y * Float64(9.0 * Float64(z * t))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])){:}
x, y, z, t, a, b = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = 27.0 * (a * b);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -9e+39)
		tmp = (x * 2.0) + t_1;
	elseif (x <= 460000000.0)
		tmp = t_1 - (9.0 * (t * (z * y)));
	else
		tmp = (x * 2.0) - (y * (9.0 * (z * t)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(27.0 * N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[x, -9e+39], N[(N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] + t$95$1), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[x, 460000000.0], N[(t$95$1 - N[(9.0 * N[(t * N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * N[(9.0 * N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if x < -8.99999999999999991e39

   1. Initial program 96.6%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 96.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      2. sub-neg 96.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      3. associate-*l* 93.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      4. associate-*l* 93.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 93.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 87.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot x + 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]

   if -8.99999999999999991e39 < x < 4.6e8

   1. Initial program 93.8%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 93.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      2. sub-neg 93.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      3. associate-*l* 93.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      4. associate-*l* 93.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 93.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 86.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right) - 9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

   if 4.6e8 < x

   1. Initial program 94.5%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 94.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      2. sub-neg 94.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      3. associate-*l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      4. associate-*l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around 0 80.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot x - 9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. pow1 80.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot x - \color{blue}{{\left(9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)\right)}^{1}} \]

   7. Applied egg-rr 80.3%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot x - \color{blue}{{\left(9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)\right)}^{1}} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow1 80.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot x - \color{blue}{9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

      2. associate-*r* 80.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot x - \color{blue}{\left(9 \cdot t\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative 80.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot x - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(9 \cdot t\right)} \]

      4. associate-*l* 83.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot x - \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(9 \cdot t\right)\right)} \]

      5. *-commutative 83.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot x - y \cdot \left(z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot 9\right)}\right) \]

   9. Simplified 83.0%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot x - \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(t \cdot 9\right)\right)} \]

   10. Taylor expanded in z around 0 83.0%

       \[\leadsto 2 \cdot x - y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(9 \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 85.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -9 \cdot 10^{+39}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 2 + 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 460000000:\\ \;\;\;\;27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right) - 9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(z \cdot y\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 2 - y \cdot \left(9 \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 98.3% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b])\\\\ [x, y, z, t, a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1 \cdot 10^{-47}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot \left(a \cdot 27\right) + \left(x \cdot 2 - t \cdot \left(9 \cdot \left(z \cdot y\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -1e-47)
   (+ (- (* x 2.0) (* (* y 9.0) (* z t))) (* a (* 27.0 b)))
   (+ (* b (* a 27.0)) (- (* x 2.0) (* t (* 9.0 (* z y)))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b);
assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -1e-47) {
		tmp = ((x * 2.0) - ((y * 9.0) * (z * t))) + (a * (27.0 * b));
	} else {
		tmp = (b * (a * 27.0)) + ((x * 2.0) - (t * (9.0 * (z * y))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-1d-47)) then
        tmp = ((x * 2.0d0) - ((y * 9.0d0) * (z * t))) + (a * (27.0d0 * b))
    else
        tmp = (b * (a * 27.0d0)) + ((x * 2.0d0) - (t * (9.0d0 * (z * y))))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b;
assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -1e-47) {
		tmp = ((x * 2.0) - ((y * 9.0) * (z * t))) + (a * (27.0 * b));
	} else {
		tmp = (b * (a * 27.0)) + ((x * 2.0) - (t * (9.0 * (z * y))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
[x, y, z, t, a, b] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -1e-47:
		tmp = ((x * 2.0) - ((y * 9.0) * (z * t))) + (a * (27.0 * b))
	else:
		tmp = (b * (a * 27.0)) + ((x * 2.0) - (t * (9.0 * (z * y))))
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
x, y, z, t, a, b = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -1e-47)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(x * 2.0) - Float64(Float64(y * 9.0) * Float64(z * t))) + Float64(a * Float64(27.0 * b)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(b * Float64(a * 27.0)) + Float64(Float64(x * 2.0) - Float64(t * Float64(9.0 * Float64(z * y)))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])){:}
x, y, z, t, a, b = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -1e-47)
		tmp = ((x * 2.0) - ((y * 9.0) * (z * t))) + (a * (27.0 * b));
	else
		tmp = (b * (a * 27.0)) + ((x * 2.0) - (t * (9.0 * (z * y))));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[z, -1e-47], N[(N[(N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(y * 9.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * N[(27.0 * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(b * N[(a * 27.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] - N[(t * N[(9.0 * N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -9.9999999999999997e-48

   1. Initial program 88.9%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 88.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      2. sub-neg 88.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      3. associate-*l* 93.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      4. associate-*l* 93.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 93.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   if -9.9999999999999997e-48 < z

   1. Initial program 97.1%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 97.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(9 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 96.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1 \cdot 10^{-47}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot \left(a \cdot 27\right) + \left(x \cdot 2 - t \cdot \left(9 \cdot \left(z \cdot y\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 96.8% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b])\\\\ [x, y, z, t, a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -4.8 \cdot 10^{+115}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 2 - y \cdot \left(9 \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot \left(a \cdot 27\right) + \left(x \cdot 2 - t \cdot \left(9 \cdot \left(z \cdot y\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -4.8e+115)
   (- (* x 2.0) (* y (* 9.0 (* z t))))
   (+ (* b (* a 27.0)) (- (* x 2.0) (* t (* 9.0 (* z y)))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b);
assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -4.8e+115) {
		tmp = (x * 2.0) - (y * (9.0 * (z * t)));
	} else {
		tmp = (b * (a * 27.0)) + ((x * 2.0) - (t * (9.0 * (z * y))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-4.8d+115)) then
        tmp = (x * 2.0d0) - (y * (9.0d0 * (z * t)))
    else
        tmp = (b * (a * 27.0d0)) + ((x * 2.0d0) - (t * (9.0d0 * (z * y))))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b;
assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -4.8e+115) {
		tmp = (x * 2.0) - (y * (9.0 * (z * t)));
	} else {
		tmp = (b * (a * 27.0)) + ((x * 2.0) - (t * (9.0 * (z * y))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
[x, y, z, t, a, b] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -4.8e+115:
		tmp = (x * 2.0) - (y * (9.0 * (z * t)))
	else:
		tmp = (b * (a * 27.0)) + ((x * 2.0) - (t * (9.0 * (z * y))))
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
x, y, z, t, a, b = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -4.8e+115)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * 2.0) - Float64(y * Float64(9.0 * Float64(z * t))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(b * Float64(a * 27.0)) + Float64(Float64(x * 2.0) - Float64(t * Float64(9.0 * Float64(z * y)))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])){:}
x, y, z, t, a, b = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -4.8e+115)
		tmp = (x * 2.0) - (y * (9.0 * (z * t)));
	else
		tmp = (b * (a * 27.0)) + ((x * 2.0) - (t * (9.0 * (z * y))));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[z, -4.8e+115], N[(N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * N[(9.0 * N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(b * N[(a * 27.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] - N[(t * N[(9.0 * N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -4.8000000000000001e115

   1. Initial program 86.2%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 86.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      2. sub-neg 86.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      3. associate-*l* 90.5%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      4. associate-*l* 90.5%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 90.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around 0 67.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot x - 9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. pow1 67.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot x - \color{blue}{{\left(9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)\right)}^{1}} \]

   7. Applied egg-rr 67.0%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot x - \color{blue}{{\left(9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)\right)}^{1}} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow1 67.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot x - \color{blue}{9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

      2. associate-*r* 67.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot x - \color{blue}{\left(9 \cdot t\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative 67.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot x - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(9 \cdot t\right)} \]

      4. associate-*l* 66.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot x - \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(9 \cdot t\right)\right)} \]

      5. *-commutative 66.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot x - y \cdot \left(z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot 9\right)}\right) \]

   9. Simplified 66.8%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot x - \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(t \cdot 9\right)\right)} \]

   10. Taylor expanded in z around 0 66.8%

       \[\leadsto 2 \cdot x - y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(9 \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

   if -4.8000000000000001e115 < z

   1. Initial program 96.2%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 96.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(9 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 91.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -4.8 \cdot 10^{+115}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 2 - y \cdot \left(9 \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot \left(a \cdot 27\right) + \left(x \cdot 2 - t \cdot \left(9 \cdot \left(z \cdot y\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 76.5% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b])\\\\ [x, y, z, t, a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -1.1 \cdot 10^{-5} \lor \neg \left(a \leq 4 \cdot 10^{-158}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 2 + 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 2 - 9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(z \cdot y\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= a -1.1e-5) (not (<= a 4e-158)))
   (+ (* x 2.0) (* 27.0 (* a b)))
   (- (* x 2.0) (* 9.0 (* t (* z y))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b);
assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((a <= -1.1e-5) || !(a <= 4e-158)) {
		tmp = (x * 2.0) + (27.0 * (a * b));
	} else {
		tmp = (x * 2.0) - (9.0 * (t * (z * y)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((a <= (-1.1d-5)) .or. (.not. (a <= 4d-158))) then
        tmp = (x * 2.0d0) + (27.0d0 * (a * b))
    else
        tmp = (x * 2.0d0) - (9.0d0 * (t * (z * y)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b;
assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((a <= -1.1e-5) || !(a <= 4e-158)) {
		tmp = (x * 2.0) + (27.0 * (a * b));
	} else {
		tmp = (x * 2.0) - (9.0 * (t * (z * y)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
[x, y, z, t, a, b] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if (a <= -1.1e-5) or not (a <= 4e-158):
		tmp = (x * 2.0) + (27.0 * (a * b))
	else:
		tmp = (x * 2.0) - (9.0 * (t * (z * y)))
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
x, y, z, t, a, b = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((a <= -1.1e-5) || !(a <= 4e-158))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * 2.0) + Float64(27.0 * Float64(a * b)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * 2.0) - Float64(9.0 * Float64(t * Float64(z * y))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])){:}
x, y, z, t, a, b = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((a <= -1.1e-5) || ~((a <= 4e-158)))
		tmp = (x * 2.0) + (27.0 * (a * b));
	else
		tmp = (x * 2.0) - (9.0 * (t * (z * y)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[a, -1.1e-5], N[Not[LessEqual[a, 4e-158]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(27.0 * N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] - N[(9.0 * N[(t * N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if a < -1.1e-5 or 4.00000000000000026e-158 < a

   1. Initial program 94.5%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 94.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      2. sub-neg 94.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      3. associate-*l* 94.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      4. associate-*l* 94.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 94.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 69.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot x + 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]

   if -1.1e-5 < a < 4.00000000000000026e-158

   1. Initial program 94.8%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 94.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      2. sub-neg 94.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      3. associate-*l* 96.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      4. associate-*l* 96.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 96.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around 0 83.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot x - 9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 74.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -1.1 \cdot 10^{-5} \lor \neg \left(a \leq 4 \cdot 10^{-158}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 2 + 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 2 - 9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(z \cdot y\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 81.2% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b])\\\\ [x, y, z, t, a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -8 \cdot 10^{-32}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 2 - y \cdot \left(9 \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 7.8 \cdot 10^{-69}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 2 + 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 2 - 9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(z \cdot y\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -8e-32)
   (- (* x 2.0) (* y (* 9.0 (* z t))))
   (if (<= z 7.8e-69)
     (+ (* x 2.0) (* 27.0 (* a b)))
     (- (* x 2.0) (* 9.0 (* t (* z y)))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b);
assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -8e-32) {
		tmp = (x * 2.0) - (y * (9.0 * (z * t)));
	} else if (z <= 7.8e-69) {
		tmp = (x * 2.0) + (27.0 * (a * b));
	} else {
		tmp = (x * 2.0) - (9.0 * (t * (z * y)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-8d-32)) then
        tmp = (x * 2.0d0) - (y * (9.0d0 * (z * t)))
    else if (z <= 7.8d-69) then
        tmp = (x * 2.0d0) + (27.0d0 * (a * b))
    else
        tmp = (x * 2.0d0) - (9.0d0 * (t * (z * y)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b;
assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -8e-32) {
		tmp = (x * 2.0) - (y * (9.0 * (z * t)));
	} else if (z <= 7.8e-69) {
		tmp = (x * 2.0) + (27.0 * (a * b));
	} else {
		tmp = (x * 2.0) - (9.0 * (t * (z * y)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
[x, y, z, t, a, b] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -8e-32:
		tmp = (x * 2.0) - (y * (9.0 * (z * t)))
	elif z <= 7.8e-69:
		tmp = (x * 2.0) + (27.0 * (a * b))
	else:
		tmp = (x * 2.0) - (9.0 * (t * (z * y)))
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
x, y, z, t, a, b = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -8e-32)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * 2.0) - Float64(y * Float64(9.0 * Float64(z * t))));
	elseif (z <= 7.8e-69)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * 2.0) + Float64(27.0 * Float64(a * b)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * 2.0) - Float64(9.0 * Float64(t * Float64(z * y))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])){:}
x, y, z, t, a, b = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -8e-32)
		tmp = (x * 2.0) - (y * (9.0 * (z * t)));
	elseif (z <= 7.8e-69)
		tmp = (x * 2.0) + (27.0 * (a * b));
	else
		tmp = (x * 2.0) - (9.0 * (t * (z * y)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[z, -8e-32], N[(N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * N[(9.0 * N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 7.8e-69], N[(N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(27.0 * N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] - N[(9.0 * N[(t * N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if z < -8.00000000000000045e-32

   1. Initial program 88.3%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 88.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      2. sub-neg 88.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      3. associate-*l* 93.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      4. associate-*l* 93.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 93.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around 0 64.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot x - 9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. pow1 64.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot x - \color{blue}{{\left(9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)\right)}^{1}} \]

   7. Applied egg-rr 64.5%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot x - \color{blue}{{\left(9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)\right)}^{1}} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow1 64.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot x - \color{blue}{9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

      2. associate-*r* 64.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot x - \color{blue}{\left(9 \cdot t\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative 64.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot x - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(9 \cdot t\right)} \]

      4. associate-*l* 66.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot x - \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(9 \cdot t\right)\right)} \]

      5. *-commutative 66.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot x - y \cdot \left(z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot 9\right)}\right) \]

   9. Simplified 66.9%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot x - \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(t \cdot 9\right)\right)} \]

   10. Taylor expanded in z around 0 67.0%

       \[\leadsto 2 \cdot x - y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(9 \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

   if -8.00000000000000045e-32 < z < 7.79999999999999961e-69

   1. Initial program 99.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 99.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      2. sub-neg 99.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      3. associate-*l* 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      4. associate-*l* 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 87.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot x + 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]

   if 7.79999999999999961e-69 < z

   1. Initial program 94.3%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 94.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      2. sub-neg 94.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      3. associate-*l* 90.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      4. associate-*l* 90.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 90.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around 0 73.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot x - 9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 77.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -8 \cdot 10^{-32}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 2 - y \cdot \left(9 \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 7.8 \cdot 10^{-69}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 2 + 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 2 - 9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(z \cdot y\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 75.5% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b])\\\\ [x, y, z, t, a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.8 \cdot 10^{+109}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(y \cdot t\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot -9\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 0.0115:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 2 + 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(y \cdot -9\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -1.8e+109)
   (* (* y t) (* z -9.0))
   (if (<= z 0.0115) (+ (* x 2.0) (* 27.0 (* a b))) (* t (* z (* y -9.0))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b);
assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -1.8e+109) {
		tmp = (y * t) * (z * -9.0);
	} else if (z <= 0.0115) {
		tmp = (x * 2.0) + (27.0 * (a * b));
	} else {
		tmp = t * (z * (y * -9.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-1.8d+109)) then
        tmp = (y * t) * (z * (-9.0d0))
    else if (z <= 0.0115d0) then
        tmp = (x * 2.0d0) + (27.0d0 * (a * b))
    else
        tmp = t * (z * (y * (-9.0d0)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b;
assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -1.8e+109) {
		tmp = (y * t) * (z * -9.0);
	} else if (z <= 0.0115) {
		tmp = (x * 2.0) + (27.0 * (a * b));
	} else {
		tmp = t * (z * (y * -9.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
[x, y, z, t, a, b] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -1.8e+109:
		tmp = (y * t) * (z * -9.0)
	elif z <= 0.0115:
		tmp = (x * 2.0) + (27.0 * (a * b))
	else:
		tmp = t * (z * (y * -9.0))
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
x, y, z, t, a, b = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -1.8e+109)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(y * t) * Float64(z * -9.0));
	elseif (z <= 0.0115)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * 2.0) + Float64(27.0 * Float64(a * b)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(t * Float64(z * Float64(y * -9.0)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])){:}
x, y, z, t, a, b = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -1.8e+109)
		tmp = (y * t) * (z * -9.0);
	elseif (z <= 0.0115)
		tmp = (x * 2.0) + (27.0 * (a * b));
	else
		tmp = t * (z * (y * -9.0));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[z, -1.8e+109], N[(N[(y * t), $MachinePrecision] * N[(z * -9.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 0.0115], N[(N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(27.0 * N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(t * N[(z * N[(y * -9.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if z < -1.8e109

   1. Initial program 87.4%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 87.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      2. sub-neg 87.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      3. associate-*l* 91.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      4. associate-*l* 91.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 91.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 50.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 50.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right) \cdot -9} \]

      2. associate-*r* 56.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(t \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right)} \cdot -9 \]

      3. associate-*l* 56.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot y\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot -9\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 56.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot y\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot -9\right)} \]

   if -1.8e109 < z < 0.0115

   1. Initial program 97.3%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 97.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      2. sub-neg 97.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      3. associate-*l* 99.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      4. associate-*l* 99.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 79.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot x + 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]

   if 0.0115 < z

   1. Initial program 92.9%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 92.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      2. sub-neg 92.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      3. associate-*l* 87.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      4. associate-*l* 87.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 87.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 53.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 53.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right) \cdot -9} \]

   7. Simplified 53.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right) \cdot -9} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. pow1 53.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\left(\left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right) \cdot -9\right)}^{1}} \]

      2. associate-*l* 53.1%

         \[\leadsto {\color{blue}{\left(t \cdot \left(\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot -9\right)\right)}}^{1} \]

      3. associate-*l* 53.0%

         \[\leadsto {\left(t \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot -9\right)\right)}\right)}^{1} \]

   9. Applied egg-rr 53.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot -9\right)\right)\right)}^{1}} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

       1. unpow1 53.0%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot -9\right)\right)} \]

       2. associate-*r* 53.1%

          \[\leadsto t \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot -9\right)} \]

       3. *-commutative 53.1%

          \[\leadsto t \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-9 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

       4. associate-*r* 53.1%

          \[\leadsto t \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(-9 \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right)} \]

       5. *-commutative 53.1%

          \[\leadsto t \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot -9\right)} \cdot z\right) \]

   11. Simplified 53.1%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(\left(y \cdot -9\right) \cdot z\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 69.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.8 \cdot 10^{+109}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(y \cdot t\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot -9\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 0.0115:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 2 + 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(y \cdot -9\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 48.4% accurate, 1.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b])\\\\ [x, y, z, t, a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -4 \cdot 10^{+15} \lor \neg \left(a \leq 2.3 \cdot 10^{-36}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= a -4e+15) (not (<= a 2.3e-36))) (* 27.0 (* a b)) (* x 2.0)))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b);
assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((a <= -4e+15) || !(a <= 2.3e-36)) {
		tmp = 27.0 * (a * b);
	} else {
		tmp = x * 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((a <= (-4d+15)) .or. (.not. (a <= 2.3d-36))) then
        tmp = 27.0d0 * (a * b)
    else
        tmp = x * 2.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b;
assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((a <= -4e+15) || !(a <= 2.3e-36)) {
		tmp = 27.0 * (a * b);
	} else {
		tmp = x * 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
[x, y, z, t, a, b] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if (a <= -4e+15) or not (a <= 2.3e-36):
		tmp = 27.0 * (a * b)
	else:
		tmp = x * 2.0
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
x, y, z, t, a, b = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((a <= -4e+15) || !(a <= 2.3e-36))
		tmp = Float64(27.0 * Float64(a * b));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * 2.0);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])){:}
x, y, z, t, a, b = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((a <= -4e+15) || ~((a <= 2.3e-36)))
		tmp = 27.0 * (a * b);
	else
		tmp = x * 2.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[a, -4e+15], N[Not[LessEqual[a, 2.3e-36]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(27.0 * N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if a < -4e15 or 2.29999999999999996e-36 < a

   1. Initial program 95.2%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 95.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      2. sub-neg 95.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      3. associate-*l* 93.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      4. associate-*l* 93.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 93.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around inf 52.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]

   if -4e15 < a < 2.29999999999999996e-36

   1. Initial program 94.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 94.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      2. sub-neg 94.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      3. associate-*l* 96.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      4. associate-*l* 96.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 96.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 48.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 50.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -4 \cdot 10^{+15} \lor \neg \left(a \leq 2.3 \cdot 10^{-36}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 2\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 31.1% accurate, 5.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b])\\\\ [x, y, z, t, a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b])\\ \\ x \cdot 2 \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b) :precision binary64 (* x 2.0))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b);
assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return x * 2.0;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = x * 2.0d0
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b;
assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return x * 2.0;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
[x, y, z, t, a, b] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return x * 2.0

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
x, y, z, t, a, b = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(x * 2.0)
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])){:}
x, y, z, t, a, b = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])){:}
function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = x * 2.0;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 94.6%

   \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. sub-neg 94.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

   2. sub-neg 94.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

   3. associate-*l* 95.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

   4. associate-*l* 95.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

3. Simplified 95.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 33.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot x} \]

6. Final simplification 33.2%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot 2 \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Developer Target 1: 94.8% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y < 7.590524218811189 \cdot 10^{-161}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot 2 - 9 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)\right)\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (< y 7.590524218811189e-161)
   (+ (- (* x 2.0) (* (* (* y 9.0) z) t)) (* a (* 27.0 b)))
   (+ (- (* x 2.0) (* 9.0 (* y (* t z)))) (* (* a 27.0) b))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (y < 7.590524218811189e-161) {
		tmp = ((x * 2.0) - (((y * 9.0) * z) * t)) + (a * (27.0 * b));
	} else {
		tmp = ((x * 2.0) - (9.0 * (y * (t * z)))) + ((a * 27.0) * b);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y < 7.590524218811189d-161) then
        tmp = ((x * 2.0d0) - (((y * 9.0d0) * z) * t)) + (a * (27.0d0 * b))
    else
        tmp = ((x * 2.0d0) - (9.0d0 * (y * (t * z)))) + ((a * 27.0d0) * b)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (y < 7.590524218811189e-161) {
		tmp = ((x * 2.0) - (((y * 9.0) * z) * t)) + (a * (27.0 * b));
	} else {
		tmp = ((x * 2.0) - (9.0 * (y * (t * z)))) + ((a * 27.0) * b);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if y < 7.590524218811189e-161:
		tmp = ((x * 2.0) - (((y * 9.0) * z) * t)) + (a * (27.0 * b))
	else:
		tmp = ((x * 2.0) - (9.0 * (y * (t * z)))) + ((a * 27.0) * b)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y < 7.590524218811189e-161)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(x * 2.0) - Float64(Float64(Float64(y * 9.0) * z) * t)) + Float64(a * Float64(27.0 * b)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(x * 2.0) - Float64(9.0 * Float64(y * Float64(t * z)))) + Float64(Float64(a * 27.0) * b));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y < 7.590524218811189e-161)
		tmp = ((x * 2.0) - (((y * 9.0) * z) * t)) + (a * (27.0 * b));
	else
		tmp = ((x * 2.0) - (9.0 * (y * (t * z)))) + ((a * 27.0) * b);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Less[y, 7.590524218811189e-161], N[(N[(N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(N[(y * 9.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * N[(27.0 * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] - N[(9.0 * N[(y * N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * 27.0), $MachinePrecision] * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024116 
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
  :name "Diagrams.Solve.Polynomial:cubForm  from diagrams-solve-0.1, A"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (! :herbie-platform default (if (< y 7590524218811189/100000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000) (+ (- (* x 2) (* (* (* y 9) z) t)) (* a (* 27 b))) (+ (- (* x 2) (* 9 (* y (* t z)))) (* (* a 27) b))))

  (+ (- (* x 2.0) (* (* (* y 9.0) z) t)) (* (* a 27.0) b)))