math.exp on complex, real part

Percentage Accurate: 100.0% → 100.0%

Time: 6.5s

Alternatives: 11

Speedup: 1.0×

• 24.7% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ e^{re} \cdot \cos im \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im) :precision binary64 (* (exp re) (cos im)))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	return exp(re) * cos(im);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    code = exp(re) * cos(im)
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	return Math.exp(re) * Math.cos(im);
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	return math.exp(re) * math.cos(im)

Julia

function code(re, im)
	return Float64(exp(re) * cos(im))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(re, im)
	tmp = exp(re) * cos(im);
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := N[(N[Exp[re], $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[im], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ e^{re} \cdot \cos im \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im) :precision binary64 (* (exp re) (cos im)))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	return exp(re) * cos(im);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    code = exp(re) * cos(im)
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	return Math.exp(re) * Math.cos(im);
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	return math.exp(re) * math.cos(im)

Julia

function code(re, im)
	return Float64(exp(re) * cos(im))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(re, im)
	tmp = exp(re) * cos(im);
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := N[(N[Exp[re], $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[im], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ e^{re} \cdot \cos im \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im) :precision binary64 (* (exp re) (cos im)))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	return exp(re) * cos(im);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    code = exp(re) * cos(im)
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	return Math.exp(re) * Math.cos(im);
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	return math.exp(re) * math.cos(im)

Julia

function code(re, im)
	return Float64(exp(re) * cos(im))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(re, im)
	tmp = exp(re) * cos(im);
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := N[(N[Exp[re], $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[im], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[e^{re} \cdot \cos im \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 92.5% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;e^{re} \leq 0 \lor \neg \left(e^{re} \leq 2\right):\\ \;\;\;\;e^{re}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\cos im\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (exp re) 0.0) (not (<= (exp re) 2.0))) (exp re) (cos im)))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if ((exp(re) <= 0.0) || !(exp(re) <= 2.0)) {
		tmp = exp(re);
	} else {
		tmp = cos(im);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((exp(re) <= 0.0d0) .or. (.not. (exp(re) <= 2.0d0))) then
        tmp = exp(re)
    else
        tmp = cos(im)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if ((Math.exp(re) <= 0.0) || !(Math.exp(re) <= 2.0)) {
		tmp = Math.exp(re);
	} else {
		tmp = Math.cos(im);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	tmp = 0
	if (math.exp(re) <= 0.0) or not (math.exp(re) <= 2.0):
		tmp = math.exp(re)
	else:
		tmp = math.cos(im)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((exp(re) <= 0.0) || !(exp(re) <= 2.0))
		tmp = exp(re);
	else
		tmp = cos(im);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((exp(re) <= 0.0) || ~((exp(re) <= 2.0)))
		tmp = exp(re);
	else
		tmp = cos(im);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[Exp[re], $MachinePrecision], 0.0], N[Not[LessEqual[N[Exp[re], $MachinePrecision], 2.0]], $MachinePrecision]], N[Exp[re], $MachinePrecision], N[Cos[im], $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (exp.f64 re) < 0.0 or 2 < (exp.f64 re)

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{re} \cdot \cos im \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in im around 0 89.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{re}} \]

   if 0.0 < (exp.f64 re) < 2

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{re} \cdot \cos im \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in re around 0 97.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\cos im} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 93.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;e^{re} \leq 0 \lor \neg \left(e^{re} \leq 2\right):\\ \;\;\;\;e^{re}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\cos im\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 97.7% accurate, 1.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;re \leq -0.04 \lor \neg \left(re \leq 0.042\right) \land re \leq 1.05 \cdot 10^{+103}:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{re}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\cos im \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + re \cdot 0.16666666666666666\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= re -0.04) (and (not (<= re 0.042)) (<= re 1.05e+103)))
   (exp re)
   (*
    (cos im)
    (+ 1.0 (* re (+ 1.0 (* re (+ 0.5 (* re 0.16666666666666666)))))))))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if ((re <= -0.04) || (!(re <= 0.042) && (re <= 1.05e+103))) {
		tmp = exp(re);
	} else {
		tmp = cos(im) * (1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * (0.5 + (re * 0.16666666666666666))))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((re <= (-0.04d0)) .or. (.not. (re <= 0.042d0)) .and. (re <= 1.05d+103)) then
        tmp = exp(re)
    else
        tmp = cos(im) * (1.0d0 + (re * (1.0d0 + (re * (0.5d0 + (re * 0.16666666666666666d0))))))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if ((re <= -0.04) || (!(re <= 0.042) && (re <= 1.05e+103))) {
		tmp = Math.exp(re);
	} else {
		tmp = Math.cos(im) * (1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * (0.5 + (re * 0.16666666666666666))))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	tmp = 0
	if (re <= -0.04) or (not (re <= 0.042) and (re <= 1.05e+103)):
		tmp = math.exp(re)
	else:
		tmp = math.cos(im) * (1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * (0.5 + (re * 0.16666666666666666))))))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((re <= -0.04) || (!(re <= 0.042) && (re <= 1.05e+103)))
		tmp = exp(re);
	else
		tmp = Float64(cos(im) * Float64(1.0 + Float64(re * Float64(1.0 + Float64(re * Float64(0.5 + Float64(re * 0.16666666666666666)))))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((re <= -0.04) || (~((re <= 0.042)) && (re <= 1.05e+103)))
		tmp = exp(re);
	else
		tmp = cos(im) * (1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * (0.5 + (re * 0.16666666666666666))))));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := If[Or[LessEqual[re, -0.04], And[N[Not[LessEqual[re, 0.042]], $MachinePrecision], LessEqual[re, 1.05e+103]]], N[Exp[re], $MachinePrecision], N[(N[Cos[im], $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.0 + N[(re * N[(1.0 + N[(re * N[(0.5 + N[(re * 0.16666666666666666), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if re < -0.0400000000000000008 or 0.0420000000000000026 < re < 1.0500000000000001e103

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{re} \cdot \cos im \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in im around 0 95.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{re}} \]

   if -0.0400000000000000008 < re < 0.0420000000000000026 or 1.0500000000000001e103 < re

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{re} \cdot \cos im \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in re around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + 0.16666666666666666 \cdot re\right)\right)\right)} \cdot \cos im \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + \color{blue}{re \cdot 0.16666666666666666}\right)\right)\right) \cdot \cos im \]

   5. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + re \cdot 0.16666666666666666\right)\right)\right)} \cdot \cos im \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;re \leq -0.04 \lor \neg \left(re \leq 0.042\right) \land re \leq 1.05 \cdot 10^{+103}:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{re}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\cos im \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + re \cdot 0.16666666666666666\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 96.6% accurate, 1.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;re \leq -36 \lor \neg \left(re \leq 0.055\right) \land re \leq 1.9 \cdot 10^{+154}:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{re}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\cos im \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot 0.5\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= re -36.0) (and (not (<= re 0.055)) (<= re 1.9e+154)))
   (exp re)
   (* (cos im) (+ 1.0 (* re (+ 1.0 (* re 0.5)))))))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if ((re <= -36.0) || (!(re <= 0.055) && (re <= 1.9e+154))) {
		tmp = exp(re);
	} else {
		tmp = cos(im) * (1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * 0.5))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((re <= (-36.0d0)) .or. (.not. (re <= 0.055d0)) .and. (re <= 1.9d+154)) then
        tmp = exp(re)
    else
        tmp = cos(im) * (1.0d0 + (re * (1.0d0 + (re * 0.5d0))))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if ((re <= -36.0) || (!(re <= 0.055) && (re <= 1.9e+154))) {
		tmp = Math.exp(re);
	} else {
		tmp = Math.cos(im) * (1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * 0.5))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	tmp = 0
	if (re <= -36.0) or (not (re <= 0.055) and (re <= 1.9e+154)):
		tmp = math.exp(re)
	else:
		tmp = math.cos(im) * (1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * 0.5))))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((re <= -36.0) || (!(re <= 0.055) && (re <= 1.9e+154)))
		tmp = exp(re);
	else
		tmp = Float64(cos(im) * Float64(1.0 + Float64(re * Float64(1.0 + Float64(re * 0.5)))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((re <= -36.0) || (~((re <= 0.055)) && (re <= 1.9e+154)))
		tmp = exp(re);
	else
		tmp = cos(im) * (1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * 0.5))));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := If[Or[LessEqual[re, -36.0], And[N[Not[LessEqual[re, 0.055]], $MachinePrecision], LessEqual[re, 1.9e+154]]], N[Exp[re], $MachinePrecision], N[(N[Cos[im], $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.0 + N[(re * N[(1.0 + N[(re * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if re < -36 or 0.0550000000000000003 < re < 1.8999999999999999e154

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{re} \cdot \cos im \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in im around 0 94.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{re}} \]

   if -36 < re < 0.0550000000000000003 or 1.8999999999999999e154 < re

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{re} \cdot \cos im \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in re around 0 99.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + 0.5 \cdot re\right)\right)} \cdot \cos im \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 97.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;re \leq -36 \lor \neg \left(re \leq 0.055\right) \land re \leq 1.9 \cdot 10^{+154}:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{re}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\cos im \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot 0.5\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 93.2% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;re \leq -0.00052 \lor \neg \left(re \leq 0.0146\right):\\ \;\;\;\;e^{re}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\cos im \cdot \left(re + 1\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= re -0.00052) (not (<= re 0.0146)))
   (exp re)
   (* (cos im) (+ re 1.0))))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if ((re <= -0.00052) || !(re <= 0.0146)) {
		tmp = exp(re);
	} else {
		tmp = cos(im) * (re + 1.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((re <= (-0.00052d0)) .or. (.not. (re <= 0.0146d0))) then
        tmp = exp(re)
    else
        tmp = cos(im) * (re + 1.0d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if ((re <= -0.00052) || !(re <= 0.0146)) {
		tmp = Math.exp(re);
	} else {
		tmp = Math.cos(im) * (re + 1.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	tmp = 0
	if (re <= -0.00052) or not (re <= 0.0146):
		tmp = math.exp(re)
	else:
		tmp = math.cos(im) * (re + 1.0)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((re <= -0.00052) || !(re <= 0.0146))
		tmp = exp(re);
	else
		tmp = Float64(cos(im) * Float64(re + 1.0));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((re <= -0.00052) || ~((re <= 0.0146)))
		tmp = exp(re);
	else
		tmp = cos(im) * (re + 1.0);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := If[Or[LessEqual[re, -0.00052], N[Not[LessEqual[re, 0.0146]], $MachinePrecision]], N[Exp[re], $MachinePrecision], N[(N[Cos[im], $MachinePrecision] * N[(re + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if re < -5.19999999999999954e-4 or 0.0146000000000000001 < re

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{re} \cdot \cos im \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in im around 0 88.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{re}} \]

   if -5.19999999999999954e-4 < re < 0.0146000000000000001

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{re} \cdot \cos im \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in re around 0 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + re\right)} \cdot \cos im \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 93.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;re \leq -0.00052 \lor \neg \left(re \leq 0.0146\right):\\ \;\;\;\;e^{re}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\cos im \cdot \left(re + 1\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 63.3% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;re \leq 3.6 \cdot 10^{-6}:\\ \;\;\;\;\cos im\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + re \cdot 0.16666666666666666\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= re 3.6e-6)
   (cos im)
   (+ 1.0 (* re (+ 1.0 (* re (+ 0.5 (* re 0.16666666666666666))))))))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if (re <= 3.6e-6) {
		tmp = cos(im);
	} else {
		tmp = 1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * (0.5 + (re * 0.16666666666666666)))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (re <= 3.6d-6) then
        tmp = cos(im)
    else
        tmp = 1.0d0 + (re * (1.0d0 + (re * (0.5d0 + (re * 0.16666666666666666d0)))))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if (re <= 3.6e-6) {
		tmp = Math.cos(im);
	} else {
		tmp = 1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * (0.5 + (re * 0.16666666666666666)))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	tmp = 0
	if re <= 3.6e-6:
		tmp = math.cos(im)
	else:
		tmp = 1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * (0.5 + (re * 0.16666666666666666)))))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (re <= 3.6e-6)
		tmp = cos(im);
	else
		tmp = Float64(1.0 + Float64(re * Float64(1.0 + Float64(re * Float64(0.5 + Float64(re * 0.16666666666666666))))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (re <= 3.6e-6)
		tmp = cos(im);
	else
		tmp = 1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * (0.5 + (re * 0.16666666666666666)))));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := If[LessEqual[re, 3.6e-6], N[Cos[im], $MachinePrecision], N[(1.0 + N[(re * N[(1.0 + N[(re * N[(0.5 + N[(re * 0.16666666666666666), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if re < 3.59999999999999984e-6

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{re} \cdot \cos im \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in re around 0 61.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\cos im} \]

   if 3.59999999999999984e-6 < re

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{re} \cdot \cos im \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in im around 0 76.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{re}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in re around 0 53.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + 0.16666666666666666 \cdot re\right)\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 73.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + \color{blue}{re \cdot 0.16666666666666666}\right)\right)\right) \cdot \cos im \]

   6. Simplified 53.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + re \cdot 0.16666666666666666\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 40.8% accurate, 11.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;im \leq 1.1 \cdot 10^{+182}:\\ \;\;\;\;1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + re \cdot 0.16666666666666666\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;1 + -0.5 \cdot \left(im \cdot im\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= im 1.1e+182)
   (+ 1.0 (* re (+ 1.0 (* re (+ 0.5 (* re 0.16666666666666666))))))
   (+ 1.0 (* -0.5 (* im im)))))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if (im <= 1.1e+182) {
		tmp = 1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * (0.5 + (re * 0.16666666666666666)))));
	} else {
		tmp = 1.0 + (-0.5 * (im * im));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (im <= 1.1d+182) then
        tmp = 1.0d0 + (re * (1.0d0 + (re * (0.5d0 + (re * 0.16666666666666666d0)))))
    else
        tmp = 1.0d0 + ((-0.5d0) * (im * im))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if (im <= 1.1e+182) {
		tmp = 1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * (0.5 + (re * 0.16666666666666666)))));
	} else {
		tmp = 1.0 + (-0.5 * (im * im));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	tmp = 0
	if im <= 1.1e+182:
		tmp = 1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * (0.5 + (re * 0.16666666666666666)))))
	else:
		tmp = 1.0 + (-0.5 * (im * im))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (im <= 1.1e+182)
		tmp = Float64(1.0 + Float64(re * Float64(1.0 + Float64(re * Float64(0.5 + Float64(re * 0.16666666666666666))))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(1.0 + Float64(-0.5 * Float64(im * im)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (im <= 1.1e+182)
		tmp = 1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * (0.5 + (re * 0.16666666666666666)))));
	else
		tmp = 1.0 + (-0.5 * (im * im));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := If[LessEqual[im, 1.1e+182], N[(1.0 + N[(re * N[(1.0 + N[(re * N[(0.5 + N[(re * 0.16666666666666666), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(1.0 + N[(-0.5 * N[(im * im), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if im < 1.09999999999999998e182

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{re} \cdot \cos im \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in im around 0 75.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{re}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in re around 0 42.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + 0.16666666666666666 \cdot re\right)\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 65.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + \color{blue}{re \cdot 0.16666666666666666}\right)\right)\right) \cdot \cos im \]

   6. Simplified 42.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + re \cdot 0.16666666666666666\right)\right)} \]

   if 1.09999999999999998e182 < im

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{re} \cdot \cos im \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in re around 0 35.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\cos im} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in im around 0 22.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 + -0.5 \cdot {im}^{2}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 22.9%

         \[\leadsto 1 + -0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(im \cdot im\right)} \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 22.9%

      \[\leadsto 1 + -0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(im \cdot im\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 38.2% accurate, 14.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;im \leq 3.4 \cdot 10^{+170}:\\ \;\;\;\;1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot 0.5\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;1 + -0.5 \cdot \left(im \cdot im\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= im 3.4e+170)
   (+ 1.0 (* re (+ 1.0 (* re 0.5))))
   (+ 1.0 (* -0.5 (* im im)))))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if (im <= 3.4e+170) {
		tmp = 1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * 0.5)));
	} else {
		tmp = 1.0 + (-0.5 * (im * im));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (im <= 3.4d+170) then
        tmp = 1.0d0 + (re * (1.0d0 + (re * 0.5d0)))
    else
        tmp = 1.0d0 + ((-0.5d0) * (im * im))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if (im <= 3.4e+170) {
		tmp = 1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * 0.5)));
	} else {
		tmp = 1.0 + (-0.5 * (im * im));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	tmp = 0
	if im <= 3.4e+170:
		tmp = 1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * 0.5)))
	else:
		tmp = 1.0 + (-0.5 * (im * im))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (im <= 3.4e+170)
		tmp = Float64(1.0 + Float64(re * Float64(1.0 + Float64(re * 0.5))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(1.0 + Float64(-0.5 * Float64(im * im)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (im <= 3.4e+170)
		tmp = 1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * 0.5)));
	else
		tmp = 1.0 + (-0.5 * (im * im));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := If[LessEqual[im, 3.4e+170], N[(1.0 + N[(re * N[(1.0 + N[(re * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(1.0 + N[(-0.5 * N[(im * im), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if im < 3.4000000000000001e170

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{re} \cdot \cos im \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in re around 0 59.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + 0.5 \cdot re\right)\right)} \cdot \cos im \]

   4. Taylor expanded in im around 0 38.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 + re \cdot \left(1 + 0.5 \cdot re\right)} \]

   if 3.4000000000000001e170 < im

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{re} \cdot \cos im \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in re around 0 38.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\cos im} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in im around 0 22.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 + -0.5 \cdot {im}^{2}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 22.0%

         \[\leadsto 1 + -0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(im \cdot im\right)} \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 22.0%

      \[\leadsto 1 + -0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(im \cdot im\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 35.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;im \leq 3.4 \cdot 10^{+170}:\\ \;\;\;\;1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot 0.5\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;1 + -0.5 \cdot \left(im \cdot im\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 31.6% accurate, 16.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;re \leq 7.8 \cdot 10^{+42}:\\ \;\;\;\;re + 1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;1 + -0.5 \cdot \left(im \cdot im\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= re 7.8e+42) (+ re 1.0) (+ 1.0 (* -0.5 (* im im)))))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if (re <= 7.8e+42) {
		tmp = re + 1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = 1.0 + (-0.5 * (im * im));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (re <= 7.8d+42) then
        tmp = re + 1.0d0
    else
        tmp = 1.0d0 + ((-0.5d0) * (im * im))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if (re <= 7.8e+42) {
		tmp = re + 1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = 1.0 + (-0.5 * (im * im));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	tmp = 0
	if re <= 7.8e+42:
		tmp = re + 1.0
	else:
		tmp = 1.0 + (-0.5 * (im * im))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (re <= 7.8e+42)
		tmp = Float64(re + 1.0);
	else
		tmp = Float64(1.0 + Float64(-0.5 * Float64(im * im)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (re <= 7.8e+42)
		tmp = re + 1.0;
	else
		tmp = 1.0 + (-0.5 * (im * im));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := If[LessEqual[re, 7.8e+42], N[(re + 1.0), $MachinePrecision], N[(1.0 + N[(-0.5 * N[(im * im), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if re < 7.79999999999999939e42

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{re} \cdot \cos im \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in re around 0 60.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + re\right)} \cdot \cos im \]

   4. Taylor expanded in im around 0 32.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 + re} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 32.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{re + 1} \]

   6. Simplified 32.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{re + 1} \]

   if 7.79999999999999939e42 < re

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{re} \cdot \cos im \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in re around 0 3.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\cos im} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in im around 0 19.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 + -0.5 \cdot {im}^{2}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 19.7%

         \[\leadsto 1 + -0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(im \cdot im\right)} \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 19.7%

      \[\leadsto 1 + -0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(im \cdot im\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 29.4% accurate, 67.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ re + 1 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im) :precision binary64 (+ re 1.0))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	return re + 1.0;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    code = re + 1.0d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	return re + 1.0;
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	return re + 1.0

Julia

function code(re, im)
	return Float64(re + 1.0)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(re, im)
	tmp = re + 1.0;
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := N[(re + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[e^{re} \cdot \cos im \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in re around 0 48.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + re\right)} \cdot \cos im \]

4. Taylor expanded in im around 0 26.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 + re} \]
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 26.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{re + 1} \]

6. Simplified 26.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{re + 1} \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 28.9% accurate, 203.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 1 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im) :precision binary64 1.0)

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	return 1.0;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    code = 1.0d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	return 1.0;
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	return 1.0

Julia

function code(re, im)
	return 1.0
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(re, im)
	tmp = 1.0;
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := 1.0

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[e^{re} \cdot \cos im \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in re around 0 47.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\cos im} \]

4. Taylor expanded in im around 0 25.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024113 
(FPCore (re im)
  :name "math.exp on complex, real part"
  :precision binary64
  (* (exp re) (cos im)))