Diagrams.Solve.Polynomial:cubForm from diagrams-solve-0.1, E

Percentage Accurate: 85.1% → 90.6%

Time: 22.3s

Alternatives: 18

Speedup: 0.5×

• 50.2% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t - \left(a \cdot 4\right) \cdot t\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot 4\right) \cdot i\right) - \left(j \cdot 27\right) \cdot k \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i j k)
 :precision binary64
 (-
  (-
   (+ (- (* (* (* (* x 18.0) y) z) t) (* (* a 4.0) t)) (* b c))
   (* (* x 4.0) i))
  (* (* j 27.0) k)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i, double j, double k) {
	return (((((((x * 18.0) * y) * z) * t) - ((a * 4.0) * t)) + (b * c)) - ((x * 4.0) * i)) - ((j * 27.0) * k);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8), intent (in) :: j
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    code = (((((((x * 18.0d0) * y) * z) * t) - ((a * 4.0d0) * t)) + (b * c)) - ((x * 4.0d0) * i)) - ((j * 27.0d0) * k)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i, double j, double k) {
	return (((((((x * 18.0) * y) * z) * t) - ((a * 4.0) * t)) + (b * c)) - ((x * 4.0) * i)) - ((j * 27.0) * k);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k):
	return (((((((x * 18.0) * y) * z) * t) - ((a * 4.0) * t)) + (b * c)) - ((x * 4.0) * i)) - ((j * 27.0) * k)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * 18.0) * y) * z) * t) - Float64(Float64(a * 4.0) * t)) + Float64(b * c)) - Float64(Float64(x * 4.0) * i)) - Float64(Float64(j * 27.0) * k))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k)
	tmp = (((((((x * 18.0) * y) * z) * t) - ((a * 4.0) * t)) + (b * c)) - ((x * 4.0) * i)) - ((j * 27.0) * k);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_, j_, k_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(x * 18.0), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] * t), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(a * 4.0), $MachinePrecision] * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(x * 4.0), $MachinePrecision] * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(j * 27.0), $MachinePrecision] * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 85.1% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t - \left(a \cdot 4\right) \cdot t\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot 4\right) \cdot i\right) - \left(j \cdot 27\right) \cdot k \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i j k)
 :precision binary64
 (-
  (-
   (+ (- (* (* (* (* x 18.0) y) z) t) (* (* a 4.0) t)) (* b c))
   (* (* x 4.0) i))
  (* (* j 27.0) k)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i, double j, double k) {
	return (((((((x * 18.0) * y) * z) * t) - ((a * 4.0) * t)) + (b * c)) - ((x * 4.0) * i)) - ((j * 27.0) * k);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8), intent (in) :: j
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    code = (((((((x * 18.0d0) * y) * z) * t) - ((a * 4.0d0) * t)) + (b * c)) - ((x * 4.0d0) * i)) - ((j * 27.0d0) * k)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i, double j, double k) {
	return (((((((x * 18.0) * y) * z) * t) - ((a * 4.0) * t)) + (b * c)) - ((x * 4.0) * i)) - ((j * 27.0) * k);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k):
	return (((((((x * 18.0) * y) * z) * t) - ((a * 4.0) * t)) + (b * c)) - ((x * 4.0) * i)) - ((j * 27.0) * k)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * 18.0) * y) * z) * t) - Float64(Float64(a * 4.0) * t)) + Float64(b * c)) - Float64(Float64(x * 4.0) * i)) - Float64(Float64(j * 27.0) * k))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k)
	tmp = (((((((x * 18.0) * y) * z) * t) - ((a * 4.0) * t)) + (b * c)) - ((x * 4.0) * i)) - ((j * 27.0) * k);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_, j_, k_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(x * 18.0), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] * t), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(a * 4.0), $MachinePrecision] * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(x * 4.0), $MachinePrecision] * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(j * 27.0), $MachinePrecision] * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 90.6% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t - t \cdot \left(a \cdot 4\right)\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot 4\right) \cdot i\right) - k \cdot \left(j \cdot 27\right) \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(t, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 18 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right), a \cdot -4\right), \mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, x \cdot \left(i \cdot -4\right)\right)\right) + j \cdot \left(k \cdot -27\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(18 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right) - 4 \cdot i\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, and k should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i j k)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<=
      (-
       (-
        (+ (- (* (* (* (* x 18.0) y) z) t) (* t (* a 4.0))) (* b c))
        (* (* x 4.0) i))
       (* k (* j 27.0)))
      INFINITY)
   (+
    (fma t (fma x (* 18.0 (* y z)) (* a -4.0)) (fma b c (* x (* i -4.0))))
    (* j (* k -27.0)))
   (* x (- (* 18.0 (* t (* y z))) (* 4.0 i)))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i && i < j && j < k);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i, double j, double k) {
	double tmp;
	if (((((((((x * 18.0) * y) * z) * t) - (t * (a * 4.0))) + (b * c)) - ((x * 4.0) * i)) - (k * (j * 27.0))) <= ((double) INFINITY)) {
		tmp = fma(t, fma(x, (18.0 * (y * z)), (a * -4.0)), fma(b, c, (x * (i * -4.0)))) + (j * (k * -27.0));
	} else {
		tmp = x * ((18.0 * (t * (y * z))) - (4.0 * i));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * 18.0) * y) * z) * t) - Float64(t * Float64(a * 4.0))) + Float64(b * c)) - Float64(Float64(x * 4.0) * i)) - Float64(k * Float64(j * 27.0))) <= Inf)
		tmp = Float64(fma(t, fma(x, Float64(18.0 * Float64(y * z)), Float64(a * -4.0)), fma(b, c, Float64(x * Float64(i * -4.0)))) + Float64(j * Float64(k * -27.0)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(Float64(18.0 * Float64(t * Float64(y * z))) - Float64(4.0 * i)));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, and k should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_, j_, k_] := If[LessEqual[N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(x * 18.0), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] * t), $MachinePrecision] - N[(t * N[(a * 4.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(x * 4.0), $MachinePrecision] * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(k * N[(j * 27.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], Infinity], N[(N[(t * N[(x * N[(18.0 * N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * -4.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(b * c + N[(x * N[(i * -4.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(j * N[(k * -27.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * N[(N[(18.0 * N[(t * N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(4.0 * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (-.f64 (-.f64 (+.f64 (-.f64 (*.f64 (*.f64 (*.f64 (*.f64 x #s(literal 18 binary64)) y) z) t) (*.f64 (*.f64 a #s(literal 4 binary64)) t)) (*.f64 b c)) (*.f64 (*.f64 x #s(literal 4 binary64)) i)) (*.f64 (*.f64 j #s(literal 27 binary64)) k)) < +inf.0

   1. Initial program 95.0%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t - \left(a \cdot 4\right) \cdot t\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot 4\right) \cdot i\right) - \left(j \cdot 27\right) \cdot k \]

   3. Simplified 97.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 18 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right), a \cdot -4\right), \mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, x \cdot \left(i \cdot -4\right)\right)\right) + j \cdot \left(k \cdot -27\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   if +inf.0 < (-.f64 (-.f64 (+.f64 (-.f64 (*.f64 (*.f64 (*.f64 (*.f64 x #s(literal 18 binary64)) y) z) t) (*.f64 (*.f64 a #s(literal 4 binary64)) t)) (*.f64 b c)) (*.f64 (*.f64 x #s(literal 4 binary64)) i)) (*.f64 (*.f64 j #s(literal 27 binary64)) k))

   1. Initial program 0.0%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t - \left(a \cdot 4\right) \cdot t\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot 4\right) \cdot i\right) - \left(j \cdot 27\right) \cdot k \]

   3. Simplified 16.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) - a \cdot 4\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 71.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(18 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right) - 4 \cdot i\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 94.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t - t \cdot \left(a \cdot 4\right)\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot 4\right) \cdot i\right) - k \cdot \left(j \cdot 27\right) \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(t, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 18 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right), a \cdot -4\right), \mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, x \cdot \left(i \cdot -4\right)\right)\right) + j \cdot \left(k \cdot -27\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(18 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right) - 4 \cdot i\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 90.6% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t - t \cdot \left(a \cdot 4\right)\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot 4\right) \cdot i\right) - k \cdot \left(j \cdot 27\right) \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(b \cdot c + t \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) - a \cdot 4\right)\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(18 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right) - 4 \cdot i\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, and k should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i j k)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<=
      (-
       (-
        (+ (- (* (* (* (* x 18.0) y) z) t) (* t (* a 4.0))) (* b c))
        (* (* x 4.0) i))
       (* k (* j 27.0)))
      INFINITY)
   (-
    (+ (* b c) (* t (- (* (* x 18.0) (* y z)) (* a 4.0))))
    (+ (* x (* 4.0 i)) (* j (* 27.0 k))))
   (* x (- (* 18.0 (* t (* y z))) (* 4.0 i)))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i && i < j && j < k);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i, double j, double k) {
	double tmp;
	if (((((((((x * 18.0) * y) * z) * t) - (t * (a * 4.0))) + (b * c)) - ((x * 4.0) * i)) - (k * (j * 27.0))) <= ((double) INFINITY)) {
		tmp = ((b * c) + (t * (((x * 18.0) * (y * z)) - (a * 4.0)))) - ((x * (4.0 * i)) + (j * (27.0 * k)));
	} else {
		tmp = x * ((18.0 * (t * (y * z))) - (4.0 * i));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i && i < j && j < k;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i, double j, double k) {
	double tmp;
	if (((((((((x * 18.0) * y) * z) * t) - (t * (a * 4.0))) + (b * c)) - ((x * 4.0) * i)) - (k * (j * 27.0))) <= Double.POSITIVE_INFINITY) {
		tmp = ((b * c) + (t * (((x * 18.0) * (y * z)) - (a * 4.0)))) - ((x * (4.0 * i)) + (j * (27.0 * k)));
	} else {
		tmp = x * ((18.0 * (t * (y * z))) - (4.0 * i));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k):
	tmp = 0
	if ((((((((x * 18.0) * y) * z) * t) - (t * (a * 4.0))) + (b * c)) - ((x * 4.0) * i)) - (k * (j * 27.0))) <= math.inf:
		tmp = ((b * c) + (t * (((x * 18.0) * (y * z)) - (a * 4.0)))) - ((x * (4.0 * i)) + (j * (27.0 * k)))
	else:
		tmp = x * ((18.0 * (t * (y * z))) - (4.0 * i))
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * 18.0) * y) * z) * t) - Float64(t * Float64(a * 4.0))) + Float64(b * c)) - Float64(Float64(x * 4.0) * i)) - Float64(k * Float64(j * 27.0))) <= Inf)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(b * c) + Float64(t * Float64(Float64(Float64(x * 18.0) * Float64(y * z)) - Float64(a * 4.0)))) - Float64(Float64(x * Float64(4.0 * i)) + Float64(j * Float64(27.0 * k))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(Float64(18.0 * Float64(t * Float64(y * z))) - Float64(4.0 * i)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((((((((x * 18.0) * y) * z) * t) - (t * (a * 4.0))) + (b * c)) - ((x * 4.0) * i)) - (k * (j * 27.0))) <= Inf)
		tmp = ((b * c) + (t * (((x * 18.0) * (y * z)) - (a * 4.0)))) - ((x * (4.0 * i)) + (j * (27.0 * k)));
	else
		tmp = x * ((18.0 * (t * (y * z))) - (4.0 * i));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, and k should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_, j_, k_] := If[LessEqual[N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(x * 18.0), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] * t), $MachinePrecision] - N[(t * N[(a * 4.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(x * 4.0), $MachinePrecision] * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(k * N[(j * 27.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], Infinity], N[(N[(N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision] + N[(t * N[(N[(N[(x * 18.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(a * 4.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(x * N[(4.0 * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(j * N[(27.0 * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * N[(N[(18.0 * N[(t * N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(4.0 * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (-.f64 (-.f64 (+.f64 (-.f64 (*.f64 (*.f64 (*.f64 (*.f64 x #s(literal 18 binary64)) y) z) t) (*.f64 (*.f64 a #s(literal 4 binary64)) t)) (*.f64 b c)) (*.f64 (*.f64 x #s(literal 4 binary64)) i)) (*.f64 (*.f64 j #s(literal 27 binary64)) k)) < +inf.0

   1. Initial program 95.0%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t - \left(a \cdot 4\right) \cdot t\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot 4\right) \cdot i\right) - \left(j \cdot 27\right) \cdot k \]

   3. Simplified 97.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) - a \cdot 4\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   if +inf.0 < (-.f64 (-.f64 (+.f64 (-.f64 (*.f64 (*.f64 (*.f64 (*.f64 x #s(literal 18 binary64)) y) z) t) (*.f64 (*.f64 a #s(literal 4 binary64)) t)) (*.f64 b c)) (*.f64 (*.f64 x #s(literal 4 binary64)) i)) (*.f64 (*.f64 j #s(literal 27 binary64)) k))

   1. Initial program 0.0%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t - \left(a \cdot 4\right) \cdot t\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot 4\right) \cdot i\right) - \left(j \cdot 27\right) \cdot k \]

   3. Simplified 16.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) - a \cdot 4\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 71.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(18 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right) - 4 \cdot i\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 93.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t - t \cdot \left(a \cdot 4\right)\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot 4\right) \cdot i\right) - k \cdot \left(j \cdot 27\right) \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(b \cdot c + t \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) - a \cdot 4\right)\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(18 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right) - 4 \cdot i\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 48.9% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := j \cdot \left(k \cdot -27\right)\\ t_2 := 18 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)\right)\\ t_3 := -4 \cdot \left(t \cdot a\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -9 \cdot 10^{+113}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq -420000000:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1 + t\_3\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 4.4 \cdot 10^{-110}:\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot c - k \cdot \left(j \cdot 27\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 1.56 \cdot 10^{-80}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1 + -4 \cdot \left(x \cdot i\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 1.05 \cdot 10^{+181}:\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot \left(c + -27 \cdot \left(j \cdot \frac{k}{b}\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 1.65 \cdot 10^{+213}:\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot c + t\_3\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, and k should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i j k)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* j (* k -27.0)))
        (t_2 (* 18.0 (* t (* x (* y z)))))
        (t_3 (* -4.0 (* t a))))
   (if (<= t -9e+113)
     t_2
     (if (<= t -420000000.0)
       (+ t_1 t_3)
       (if (<= t 4.4e-110)
         (- (* b c) (* k (* j 27.0)))
         (if (<= t 1.56e-80)
           (+ t_1 (* -4.0 (* x i)))
           (if (<= t 1.05e+181)
             (* b (+ c (* -27.0 (* j (/ k b)))))
             (if (<= t 1.65e+213) (+ (* b c) t_3) t_2))))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i && i < j && j < k);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i, double j, double k) {
	double t_1 = j * (k * -27.0);
	double t_2 = 18.0 * (t * (x * (y * z)));
	double t_3 = -4.0 * (t * a);
	double tmp;
	if (t <= -9e+113) {
		tmp = t_2;
	} else if (t <= -420000000.0) {
		tmp = t_1 + t_3;
	} else if (t <= 4.4e-110) {
		tmp = (b * c) - (k * (j * 27.0));
	} else if (t <= 1.56e-80) {
		tmp = t_1 + (-4.0 * (x * i));
	} else if (t <= 1.05e+181) {
		tmp = b * (c + (-27.0 * (j * (k / b))));
	} else if (t <= 1.65e+213) {
		tmp = (b * c) + t_3;
	} else {
		tmp = t_2;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, and k should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8), intent (in) :: j
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: t_2
    real(8) :: t_3
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = j * (k * (-27.0d0))
    t_2 = 18.0d0 * (t * (x * (y * z)))
    t_3 = (-4.0d0) * (t * a)
    if (t <= (-9d+113)) then
        tmp = t_2
    else if (t <= (-420000000.0d0)) then
        tmp = t_1 + t_3
    else if (t <= 4.4d-110) then
        tmp = (b * c) - (k * (j * 27.0d0))
    else if (t <= 1.56d-80) then
        tmp = t_1 + ((-4.0d0) * (x * i))
    else if (t <= 1.05d+181) then
        tmp = b * (c + ((-27.0d0) * (j * (k / b))))
    else if (t <= 1.65d+213) then
        tmp = (b * c) + t_3
    else
        tmp = t_2
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i && i < j && j < k;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i, double j, double k) {
	double t_1 = j * (k * -27.0);
	double t_2 = 18.0 * (t * (x * (y * z)));
	double t_3 = -4.0 * (t * a);
	double tmp;
	if (t <= -9e+113) {
		tmp = t_2;
	} else if (t <= -420000000.0) {
		tmp = t_1 + t_3;
	} else if (t <= 4.4e-110) {
		tmp = (b * c) - (k * (j * 27.0));
	} else if (t <= 1.56e-80) {
		tmp = t_1 + (-4.0 * (x * i));
	} else if (t <= 1.05e+181) {
		tmp = b * (c + (-27.0 * (j * (k / b))));
	} else if (t <= 1.65e+213) {
		tmp = (b * c) + t_3;
	} else {
		tmp = t_2;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k):
	t_1 = j * (k * -27.0)
	t_2 = 18.0 * (t * (x * (y * z)))
	t_3 = -4.0 * (t * a)
	tmp = 0
	if t <= -9e+113:
		tmp = t_2
	elif t <= -420000000.0:
		tmp = t_1 + t_3
	elif t <= 4.4e-110:
		tmp = (b * c) - (k * (j * 27.0))
	elif t <= 1.56e-80:
		tmp = t_1 + (-4.0 * (x * i))
	elif t <= 1.05e+181:
		tmp = b * (c + (-27.0 * (j * (k / b))))
	elif t <= 1.65e+213:
		tmp = (b * c) + t_3
	else:
		tmp = t_2
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k)
	t_1 = Float64(j * Float64(k * -27.0))
	t_2 = Float64(18.0 * Float64(t * Float64(x * Float64(y * z))))
	t_3 = Float64(-4.0 * Float64(t * a))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t <= -9e+113)
		tmp = t_2;
	elseif (t <= -420000000.0)
		tmp = Float64(t_1 + t_3);
	elseif (t <= 4.4e-110)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(b * c) - Float64(k * Float64(j * 27.0)));
	elseif (t <= 1.56e-80)
		tmp = Float64(t_1 + Float64(-4.0 * Float64(x * i)));
	elseif (t <= 1.05e+181)
		tmp = Float64(b * Float64(c + Float64(-27.0 * Float64(j * Float64(k / b)))));
	elseif (t <= 1.65e+213)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(b * c) + t_3);
	else
		tmp = t_2;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k)
	t_1 = j * (k * -27.0);
	t_2 = 18.0 * (t * (x * (y * z)));
	t_3 = -4.0 * (t * a);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t <= -9e+113)
		tmp = t_2;
	elseif (t <= -420000000.0)
		tmp = t_1 + t_3;
	elseif (t <= 4.4e-110)
		tmp = (b * c) - (k * (j * 27.0));
	elseif (t <= 1.56e-80)
		tmp = t_1 + (-4.0 * (x * i));
	elseif (t <= 1.05e+181)
		tmp = b * (c + (-27.0 * (j * (k / b))));
	elseif (t <= 1.65e+213)
		tmp = (b * c) + t_3;
	else
		tmp = t_2;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, and k should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_, j_, k_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(j * N[(k * -27.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[(18.0 * N[(t * N[(x * N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$3 = N[(-4.0 * N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t, -9e+113], t$95$2, If[LessEqual[t, -420000000.0], N[(t$95$1 + t$95$3), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[t, 4.4e-110], N[(N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision] - N[(k * N[(j * 27.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[t, 1.56e-80], N[(t$95$1 + N[(-4.0 * N[(x * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[t, 1.05e+181], N[(b * N[(c + N[(-27.0 * N[(j * N[(k / b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[t, 1.65e+213], N[(N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision] + t$95$3), $MachinePrecision], t$95$2]]]]]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 6 regimes

2. if t < -9.0000000000000001e113 or 1.6500000000000001e213 < t

   1. Initial program 73.0%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t - \left(a \cdot 4\right) \cdot t\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot 4\right) \cdot i\right) - \left(j \cdot 27\right) \cdot k \]

   3. Simplified 76.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) - a \cdot 4\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 75.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(18 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right) - 4 \cdot i\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around inf 75.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{18 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)\right)} \]

   if -9.0000000000000001e113 < t < -4.2e8

   1. Initial program 91.2%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t - \left(a \cdot 4\right) \cdot t\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot 4\right) \cdot i\right) - \left(j \cdot 27\right) \cdot k \]

   3. Simplified 91.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 18 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right), a \cdot -4\right), \mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, x \cdot \left(i \cdot -4\right)\right)\right) + j \cdot \left(k \cdot -27\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around inf 60.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \left(a \cdot t\right)} + j \cdot \left(k \cdot -27\right) \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 60.8%

         \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot a\right)} + j \cdot \left(k \cdot -27\right) \]

   7. Simplified 60.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \left(t \cdot a\right)} + j \cdot \left(k \cdot -27\right) \]

   if -4.2e8 < t < 4.3999999999999999e-110

   1. Initial program 87.1%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t - \left(a \cdot 4\right) \cdot t\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot 4\right) \cdot i\right) - \left(j \cdot 27\right) \cdot k \]

   3. Simplified 91.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) - a \cdot 4\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in t around 0 82.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot c - \left(4 \cdot \left(i \cdot x\right) + 27 \cdot \left(j \cdot k\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in i around 0 63.7%

      \[\leadsto b \cdot c - \color{blue}{27 \cdot \left(j \cdot k\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 63.8%

         \[\leadsto b \cdot c - \color{blue}{\left(27 \cdot j\right) \cdot k} \]

      2. *-commutative 63.8%

         \[\leadsto b \cdot c - \color{blue}{\left(j \cdot 27\right)} \cdot k \]

      3. *-commutative 63.8%

         \[\leadsto b \cdot c - \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(j \cdot 27\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 63.8%

         \[\leadsto b \cdot c - k \cdot \color{blue}{\left(27 \cdot j\right)} \]

   8. Simplified 63.8%

      \[\leadsto b \cdot c - \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(27 \cdot j\right)} \]

   if 4.3999999999999999e-110 < t < 1.55999999999999994e-80

   1. Initial program 90.0%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t - \left(a \cdot 4\right) \cdot t\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot 4\right) \cdot i\right) - \left(j \cdot 27\right) \cdot k \]

   3. Simplified 90.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 18 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right), a \cdot -4\right), \mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, x \cdot \left(i \cdot -4\right)\right)\right) + j \cdot \left(k \cdot -27\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in i around inf 80.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \left(i \cdot x\right)} + j \cdot \left(k \cdot -27\right) \]

   if 1.55999999999999994e-80 < t < 1.04999999999999999e181

   1. Initial program 82.0%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t - \left(a \cdot 4\right) \cdot t\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot 4\right) \cdot i\right) - \left(j \cdot 27\right) \cdot k \]

   3. Simplified 84.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) - a \cdot 4\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in t around 0 60.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot c - \left(4 \cdot \left(i \cdot x\right) + 27 \cdot \left(j \cdot k\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in i around 0 55.7%

      \[\leadsto b \cdot c - \color{blue}{27 \cdot \left(j \cdot k\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 55.8%

         \[\leadsto b \cdot c - \color{blue}{\left(27 \cdot j\right) \cdot k} \]

      2. *-commutative 55.8%

         \[\leadsto b \cdot c - \color{blue}{\left(j \cdot 27\right)} \cdot k \]

      3. *-commutative 55.8%

         \[\leadsto b \cdot c - \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(j \cdot 27\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 55.8%

         \[\leadsto b \cdot c - k \cdot \color{blue}{\left(27 \cdot j\right)} \]

   8. Simplified 55.8%

      \[\leadsto b \cdot c - \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(27 \cdot j\right)} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in b around inf 55.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot \left(c + -27 \cdot \frac{j \cdot k}{b}\right)} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

       1. *-commutative 55.6%

          \[\leadsto b \cdot \left(c + \color{blue}{\frac{j \cdot k}{b} \cdot -27}\right) \]

       2. associate-/l* 60.2%

          \[\leadsto b \cdot \left(c + \color{blue}{\left(j \cdot \frac{k}{b}\right)} \cdot -27\right) \]

   11. Simplified 60.2%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot \left(c + \left(j \cdot \frac{k}{b}\right) \cdot -27\right)} \]

   if 1.04999999999999999e181 < t < 1.6500000000000001e213

   1. Initial program 76.5%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t - \left(a \cdot 4\right) \cdot t\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot 4\right) \cdot i\right) - \left(j \cdot 27\right) \cdot k \]

   3. Simplified 87.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) - a \cdot 4\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 88.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-4 \cdot \left(a \cdot t\right) + b \cdot c\right) - 27 \cdot \left(j \cdot k\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in j around 0 88.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \left(a \cdot t\right) + b \cdot c} \]
3. Recombined 6 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 66.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -9 \cdot 10^{+113}:\\ \;\;\;\;18 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq -420000000:\\ \;\;\;\;j \cdot \left(k \cdot -27\right) + -4 \cdot \left(t \cdot a\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 4.4 \cdot 10^{-110}:\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot c - k \cdot \left(j \cdot 27\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 1.56 \cdot 10^{-80}:\\ \;\;\;\;j \cdot \left(k \cdot -27\right) + -4 \cdot \left(x \cdot i\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 1.05 \cdot 10^{+181}:\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot \left(c + -27 \cdot \left(j \cdot \frac{k}{b}\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 1.65 \cdot 10^{+213}:\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot c + -4 \cdot \left(t \cdot a\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;18 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 48.8% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := 18 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -5.5 \cdot 10^{+113}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 2.2 \cdot 10^{-103}:\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot c - k \cdot \left(j \cdot 27\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 1.32 \cdot 10^{-80}:\\ \;\;\;\;j \cdot \left(k \cdot -27\right) + -4 \cdot \left(x \cdot i\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 2.2 \cdot 10^{+182}:\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot \left(c + -27 \cdot \left(j \cdot \frac{k}{b}\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 1.02 \cdot 10^{+213}:\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot c + -4 \cdot \left(t \cdot a\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, and k should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i j k)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* 18.0 (* t (* x (* y z))))))
   (if (<= t -5.5e+113)
     t_1
     (if (<= t 2.2e-103)
       (- (* b c) (* k (* j 27.0)))
       (if (<= t 1.32e-80)
         (+ (* j (* k -27.0)) (* -4.0 (* x i)))
         (if (<= t 2.2e+182)
           (* b (+ c (* -27.0 (* j (/ k b)))))
           (if (<= t 1.02e+213) (+ (* b c) (* -4.0 (* t a))) t_1)))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i && i < j && j < k);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i, double j, double k) {
	double t_1 = 18.0 * (t * (x * (y * z)));
	double tmp;
	if (t <= -5.5e+113) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (t <= 2.2e-103) {
		tmp = (b * c) - (k * (j * 27.0));
	} else if (t <= 1.32e-80) {
		tmp = (j * (k * -27.0)) + (-4.0 * (x * i));
	} else if (t <= 2.2e+182) {
		tmp = b * (c + (-27.0 * (j * (k / b))));
	} else if (t <= 1.02e+213) {
		tmp = (b * c) + (-4.0 * (t * a));
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, and k should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8), intent (in) :: j
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = 18.0d0 * (t * (x * (y * z)))
    if (t <= (-5.5d+113)) then
        tmp = t_1
    else if (t <= 2.2d-103) then
        tmp = (b * c) - (k * (j * 27.0d0))
    else if (t <= 1.32d-80) then
        tmp = (j * (k * (-27.0d0))) + ((-4.0d0) * (x * i))
    else if (t <= 2.2d+182) then
        tmp = b * (c + ((-27.0d0) * (j * (k / b))))
    else if (t <= 1.02d+213) then
        tmp = (b * c) + ((-4.0d0) * (t * a))
    else
        tmp = t_1
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i && i < j && j < k;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i, double j, double k) {
	double t_1 = 18.0 * (t * (x * (y * z)));
	double tmp;
	if (t <= -5.5e+113) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (t <= 2.2e-103) {
		tmp = (b * c) - (k * (j * 27.0));
	} else if (t <= 1.32e-80) {
		tmp = (j * (k * -27.0)) + (-4.0 * (x * i));
	} else if (t <= 2.2e+182) {
		tmp = b * (c + (-27.0 * (j * (k / b))));
	} else if (t <= 1.02e+213) {
		tmp = (b * c) + (-4.0 * (t * a));
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k):
	t_1 = 18.0 * (t * (x * (y * z)))
	tmp = 0
	if t <= -5.5e+113:
		tmp = t_1
	elif t <= 2.2e-103:
		tmp = (b * c) - (k * (j * 27.0))
	elif t <= 1.32e-80:
		tmp = (j * (k * -27.0)) + (-4.0 * (x * i))
	elif t <= 2.2e+182:
		tmp = b * (c + (-27.0 * (j * (k / b))))
	elif t <= 1.02e+213:
		tmp = (b * c) + (-4.0 * (t * a))
	else:
		tmp = t_1
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k)
	t_1 = Float64(18.0 * Float64(t * Float64(x * Float64(y * z))))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t <= -5.5e+113)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (t <= 2.2e-103)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(b * c) - Float64(k * Float64(j * 27.0)));
	elseif (t <= 1.32e-80)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(j * Float64(k * -27.0)) + Float64(-4.0 * Float64(x * i)));
	elseif (t <= 2.2e+182)
		tmp = Float64(b * Float64(c + Float64(-27.0 * Float64(j * Float64(k / b)))));
	elseif (t <= 1.02e+213)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(b * c) + Float64(-4.0 * Float64(t * a)));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k)
	t_1 = 18.0 * (t * (x * (y * z)));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t <= -5.5e+113)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (t <= 2.2e-103)
		tmp = (b * c) - (k * (j * 27.0));
	elseif (t <= 1.32e-80)
		tmp = (j * (k * -27.0)) + (-4.0 * (x * i));
	elseif (t <= 2.2e+182)
		tmp = b * (c + (-27.0 * (j * (k / b))));
	elseif (t <= 1.02e+213)
		tmp = (b * c) + (-4.0 * (t * a));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, and k should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_, j_, k_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(18.0 * N[(t * N[(x * N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t, -5.5e+113], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[t, 2.2e-103], N[(N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision] - N[(k * N[(j * 27.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[t, 1.32e-80], N[(N[(j * N[(k * -27.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(-4.0 * N[(x * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[t, 2.2e+182], N[(b * N[(c + N[(-27.0 * N[(j * N[(k / b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[t, 1.02e+213], N[(N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision] + N[(-4.0 * N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 5 regimes

2. if t < -5.5000000000000001e113 or 1.02e213 < t

   1. Initial program 73.0%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t - \left(a \cdot 4\right) \cdot t\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot 4\right) \cdot i\right) - \left(j \cdot 27\right) \cdot k \]

   3. Simplified 76.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) - a \cdot 4\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 75.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(18 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right) - 4 \cdot i\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around inf 75.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{18 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)\right)} \]

   if -5.5000000000000001e113 < t < 2.1999999999999999e-103

   1. Initial program 87.7%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t - \left(a \cdot 4\right) \cdot t\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot 4\right) \cdot i\right) - \left(j \cdot 27\right) \cdot k \]

   3. Simplified 91.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) - a \cdot 4\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in t around 0 77.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot c - \left(4 \cdot \left(i \cdot x\right) + 27 \cdot \left(j \cdot k\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in i around 0 60.4%

      \[\leadsto b \cdot c - \color{blue}{27 \cdot \left(j \cdot k\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 60.4%

         \[\leadsto b \cdot c - \color{blue}{\left(27 \cdot j\right) \cdot k} \]

      2. *-commutative 60.4%

         \[\leadsto b \cdot c - \color{blue}{\left(j \cdot 27\right)} \cdot k \]

      3. *-commutative 60.4%

         \[\leadsto b \cdot c - \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(j \cdot 27\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 60.4%

         \[\leadsto b \cdot c - k \cdot \color{blue}{\left(27 \cdot j\right)} \]

   8. Simplified 60.4%

      \[\leadsto b \cdot c - \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(27 \cdot j\right)} \]

   if 2.1999999999999999e-103 < t < 1.31999999999999995e-80

   1. Initial program 90.0%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t - \left(a \cdot 4\right) \cdot t\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot 4\right) \cdot i\right) - \left(j \cdot 27\right) \cdot k \]

   3. Simplified 90.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 18 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right), a \cdot -4\right), \mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, x \cdot \left(i \cdot -4\right)\right)\right) + j \cdot \left(k \cdot -27\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in i around inf 80.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \left(i \cdot x\right)} + j \cdot \left(k \cdot -27\right) \]

   if 1.31999999999999995e-80 < t < 2.19999999999999997e182

   1. Initial program 82.0%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t - \left(a \cdot 4\right) \cdot t\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot 4\right) \cdot i\right) - \left(j \cdot 27\right) \cdot k \]

   3. Simplified 84.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) - a \cdot 4\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in t around 0 60.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot c - \left(4 \cdot \left(i \cdot x\right) + 27 \cdot \left(j \cdot k\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in i around 0 55.7%

      \[\leadsto b \cdot c - \color{blue}{27 \cdot \left(j \cdot k\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 55.8%

         \[\leadsto b \cdot c - \color{blue}{\left(27 \cdot j\right) \cdot k} \]

      2. *-commutative 55.8%

         \[\leadsto b \cdot c - \color{blue}{\left(j \cdot 27\right)} \cdot k \]

      3. *-commutative 55.8%

         \[\leadsto b \cdot c - \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(j \cdot 27\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 55.8%

         \[\leadsto b \cdot c - k \cdot \color{blue}{\left(27 \cdot j\right)} \]

   8. Simplified 55.8%

      \[\leadsto b \cdot c - \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(27 \cdot j\right)} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in b around inf 55.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot \left(c + -27 \cdot \frac{j \cdot k}{b}\right)} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

       1. *-commutative 55.6%

          \[\leadsto b \cdot \left(c + \color{blue}{\frac{j \cdot k}{b} \cdot -27}\right) \]

       2. associate-/l* 60.2%

          \[\leadsto b \cdot \left(c + \color{blue}{\left(j \cdot \frac{k}{b}\right)} \cdot -27\right) \]

   11. Simplified 60.2%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot \left(c + \left(j \cdot \frac{k}{b}\right) \cdot -27\right)} \]

   if 2.19999999999999997e182 < t < 1.02e213

   1. Initial program 76.5%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t - \left(a \cdot 4\right) \cdot t\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot 4\right) \cdot i\right) - \left(j \cdot 27\right) \cdot k \]

   3. Simplified 87.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) - a \cdot 4\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 88.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-4 \cdot \left(a \cdot t\right) + b \cdot c\right) - 27 \cdot \left(j \cdot k\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in j around 0 88.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \left(a \cdot t\right) + b \cdot c} \]
3. Recombined 5 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 65.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -5.5 \cdot 10^{+113}:\\ \;\;\;\;18 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 2.2 \cdot 10^{-103}:\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot c - k \cdot \left(j \cdot 27\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 1.32 \cdot 10^{-80}:\\ \;\;\;\;j \cdot \left(k \cdot -27\right) + -4 \cdot \left(x \cdot i\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 2.2 \cdot 10^{+182}:\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot \left(c + -27 \cdot \left(j \cdot \frac{k}{b}\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 1.02 \cdot 10^{+213}:\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot c + -4 \cdot \left(t \cdot a\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;18 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 79.2% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.15 \cdot 10^{+21}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(-27 \cdot \frac{j \cdot k}{y} + 18 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 2.4 \cdot 10^{+60}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(\left(b \cdot c - 4 \cdot \left(t \cdot a\right)\right) - \left(x \cdot 4\right) \cdot i\right) - k \cdot \left(j \cdot 27\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(b \cdot c + t \cdot \left(18 \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right) - a \cdot 4\right)\right) - 4 \cdot \left(x \cdot i\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, and k should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i j k)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -2.15e+21)
   (* y (+ (* -27.0 (/ (* j k) y)) (* 18.0 (* t (* x z)))))
   (if (<= z 2.4e+60)
     (- (- (- (* b c) (* 4.0 (* t a))) (* (* x 4.0) i)) (* k (* j 27.0)))
     (-
      (+ (* b c) (* t (- (* 18.0 (* x (* y z))) (* a 4.0))))
      (* 4.0 (* x i))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i && i < j && j < k);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i, double j, double k) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -2.15e+21) {
		tmp = y * ((-27.0 * ((j * k) / y)) + (18.0 * (t * (x * z))));
	} else if (z <= 2.4e+60) {
		tmp = (((b * c) - (4.0 * (t * a))) - ((x * 4.0) * i)) - (k * (j * 27.0));
	} else {
		tmp = ((b * c) + (t * ((18.0 * (x * (y * z))) - (a * 4.0)))) - (4.0 * (x * i));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, and k should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8), intent (in) :: j
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-2.15d+21)) then
        tmp = y * (((-27.0d0) * ((j * k) / y)) + (18.0d0 * (t * (x * z))))
    else if (z <= 2.4d+60) then
        tmp = (((b * c) - (4.0d0 * (t * a))) - ((x * 4.0d0) * i)) - (k * (j * 27.0d0))
    else
        tmp = ((b * c) + (t * ((18.0d0 * (x * (y * z))) - (a * 4.0d0)))) - (4.0d0 * (x * i))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i && i < j && j < k;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i, double j, double k) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -2.15e+21) {
		tmp = y * ((-27.0 * ((j * k) / y)) + (18.0 * (t * (x * z))));
	} else if (z <= 2.4e+60) {
		tmp = (((b * c) - (4.0 * (t * a))) - ((x * 4.0) * i)) - (k * (j * 27.0));
	} else {
		tmp = ((b * c) + (t * ((18.0 * (x * (y * z))) - (a * 4.0)))) - (4.0 * (x * i));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -2.15e+21:
		tmp = y * ((-27.0 * ((j * k) / y)) + (18.0 * (t * (x * z))))
	elif z <= 2.4e+60:
		tmp = (((b * c) - (4.0 * (t * a))) - ((x * 4.0) * i)) - (k * (j * 27.0))
	else:
		tmp = ((b * c) + (t * ((18.0 * (x * (y * z))) - (a * 4.0)))) - (4.0 * (x * i))
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -2.15e+21)
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(Float64(-27.0 * Float64(Float64(j * k) / y)) + Float64(18.0 * Float64(t * Float64(x * z)))));
	elseif (z <= 2.4e+60)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(b * c) - Float64(4.0 * Float64(t * a))) - Float64(Float64(x * 4.0) * i)) - Float64(k * Float64(j * 27.0)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(b * c) + Float64(t * Float64(Float64(18.0 * Float64(x * Float64(y * z))) - Float64(a * 4.0)))) - Float64(4.0 * Float64(x * i)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -2.15e+21)
		tmp = y * ((-27.0 * ((j * k) / y)) + (18.0 * (t * (x * z))));
	elseif (z <= 2.4e+60)
		tmp = (((b * c) - (4.0 * (t * a))) - ((x * 4.0) * i)) - (k * (j * 27.0));
	else
		tmp = ((b * c) + (t * ((18.0 * (x * (y * z))) - (a * 4.0)))) - (4.0 * (x * i));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, and k should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_, j_, k_] := If[LessEqual[z, -2.15e+21], N[(y * N[(N[(-27.0 * N[(N[(j * k), $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(18.0 * N[(t * N[(x * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 2.4e+60], N[(N[(N[(N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision] - N[(4.0 * N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(x * 4.0), $MachinePrecision] * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(k * N[(j * 27.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision] + N[(t * N[(N[(18.0 * N[(x * N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(a * 4.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(4.0 * N[(x * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if z < -2.15e21

   1. Initial program 81.3%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t - \left(a \cdot 4\right) \cdot t\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot 4\right) \cdot i\right) - \left(j \cdot 27\right) \cdot k \]

   3. Simplified 78.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 18 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right), a \cdot -4\right), \mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, x \cdot \left(i \cdot -4\right)\right)\right) + j \cdot \left(k \cdot -27\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 60.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{18 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)\right)} + j \cdot \left(k \cdot -27\right) \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 61.7%

         \[\leadsto 18 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(t \cdot x\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} + j \cdot \left(k \cdot -27\right) \]

   7. Simplified 61.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{18 \cdot \left(\left(t \cdot x\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} + j \cdot \left(k \cdot -27\right) \]

   8. Taylor expanded in y around inf 58.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-27 \cdot \frac{j \cdot k}{y} + 18 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right)\right)\right)} \]

   if -2.15e21 < z < 2.4e60

   1. Initial program 86.7%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t - \left(a \cdot 4\right) \cdot t\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot 4\right) \cdot i\right) - \left(j \cdot 27\right) \cdot k \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 89.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(b \cdot c - 4 \cdot \left(a \cdot t\right)\right)} - \left(x \cdot 4\right) \cdot i\right) - \left(j \cdot 27\right) \cdot k \]

   if 2.4e60 < z

   1. Initial program 76.6%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t - \left(a \cdot 4\right) \cdot t\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot 4\right) \cdot i\right) - \left(j \cdot 27\right) \cdot k \]

   3. Simplified 80.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) - a \cdot 4\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in j around 0 70.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot c + t \cdot \left(18 \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right) - 4 \cdot a\right)\right) - 4 \cdot \left(i \cdot x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 78.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.15 \cdot 10^{+21}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(-27 \cdot \frac{j \cdot k}{y} + 18 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 2.4 \cdot 10^{+60}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(\left(b \cdot c - 4 \cdot \left(t \cdot a\right)\right) - \left(x \cdot 4\right) \cdot i\right) - k \cdot \left(j \cdot 27\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(b \cdot c + t \cdot \left(18 \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right) - a \cdot 4\right)\right) - 4 \cdot \left(x \cdot i\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 78.2% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.25 \cdot 10^{+21}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(-27 \cdot \frac{j \cdot k}{y} + 18 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 2.1 \cdot 10^{+154}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(\left(b \cdot c - 4 \cdot \left(t \cdot a\right)\right) - \left(x \cdot 4\right) \cdot i\right) - k \cdot \left(j \cdot 27\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(-27 \cdot \frac{j \cdot k}{z} + 18 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, and k should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i j k)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -2.25e+21)
   (* y (+ (* -27.0 (/ (* j k) y)) (* 18.0 (* t (* x z)))))
   (if (<= z 2.1e+154)
     (- (- (- (* b c) (* 4.0 (* t a))) (* (* x 4.0) i)) (* k (* j 27.0)))
     (* z (+ (* -27.0 (/ (* j k) z)) (* 18.0 (* t (* x y))))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i && i < j && j < k);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i, double j, double k) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -2.25e+21) {
		tmp = y * ((-27.0 * ((j * k) / y)) + (18.0 * (t * (x * z))));
	} else if (z <= 2.1e+154) {
		tmp = (((b * c) - (4.0 * (t * a))) - ((x * 4.0) * i)) - (k * (j * 27.0));
	} else {
		tmp = z * ((-27.0 * ((j * k) / z)) + (18.0 * (t * (x * y))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, and k should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8), intent (in) :: j
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-2.25d+21)) then
        tmp = y * (((-27.0d0) * ((j * k) / y)) + (18.0d0 * (t * (x * z))))
    else if (z <= 2.1d+154) then
        tmp = (((b * c) - (4.0d0 * (t * a))) - ((x * 4.0d0) * i)) - (k * (j * 27.0d0))
    else
        tmp = z * (((-27.0d0) * ((j * k) / z)) + (18.0d0 * (t * (x * y))))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i && i < j && j < k;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i, double j, double k) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -2.25e+21) {
		tmp = y * ((-27.0 * ((j * k) / y)) + (18.0 * (t * (x * z))));
	} else if (z <= 2.1e+154) {
		tmp = (((b * c) - (4.0 * (t * a))) - ((x * 4.0) * i)) - (k * (j * 27.0));
	} else {
		tmp = z * ((-27.0 * ((j * k) / z)) + (18.0 * (t * (x * y))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -2.25e+21:
		tmp = y * ((-27.0 * ((j * k) / y)) + (18.0 * (t * (x * z))))
	elif z <= 2.1e+154:
		tmp = (((b * c) - (4.0 * (t * a))) - ((x * 4.0) * i)) - (k * (j * 27.0))
	else:
		tmp = z * ((-27.0 * ((j * k) / z)) + (18.0 * (t * (x * y))))
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -2.25e+21)
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(Float64(-27.0 * Float64(Float64(j * k) / y)) + Float64(18.0 * Float64(t * Float64(x * z)))));
	elseif (z <= 2.1e+154)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(b * c) - Float64(4.0 * Float64(t * a))) - Float64(Float64(x * 4.0) * i)) - Float64(k * Float64(j * 27.0)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * Float64(Float64(-27.0 * Float64(Float64(j * k) / z)) + Float64(18.0 * Float64(t * Float64(x * y)))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -2.25e+21)
		tmp = y * ((-27.0 * ((j * k) / y)) + (18.0 * (t * (x * z))));
	elseif (z <= 2.1e+154)
		tmp = (((b * c) - (4.0 * (t * a))) - ((x * 4.0) * i)) - (k * (j * 27.0));
	else
		tmp = z * ((-27.0 * ((j * k) / z)) + (18.0 * (t * (x * y))));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, and k should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_, j_, k_] := If[LessEqual[z, -2.25e+21], N[(y * N[(N[(-27.0 * N[(N[(j * k), $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(18.0 * N[(t * N[(x * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 2.1e+154], N[(N[(N[(N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision] - N[(4.0 * N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(x * 4.0), $MachinePrecision] * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(k * N[(j * 27.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * N[(N[(-27.0 * N[(N[(j * k), $MachinePrecision] / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(18.0 * N[(t * N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if z < -2.25e21

   1. Initial program 81.3%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t - \left(a \cdot 4\right) \cdot t\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot 4\right) \cdot i\right) - \left(j \cdot 27\right) \cdot k \]

   3. Simplified 78.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 18 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right), a \cdot -4\right), \mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, x \cdot \left(i \cdot -4\right)\right)\right) + j \cdot \left(k \cdot -27\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 60.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{18 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)\right)} + j \cdot \left(k \cdot -27\right) \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 61.7%

         \[\leadsto 18 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(t \cdot x\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} + j \cdot \left(k \cdot -27\right) \]

   7. Simplified 61.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{18 \cdot \left(\left(t \cdot x\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} + j \cdot \left(k \cdot -27\right) \]

   8. Taylor expanded in y around inf 58.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-27 \cdot \frac{j \cdot k}{y} + 18 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right)\right)\right)} \]

   if -2.25e21 < z < 2.09999999999999994e154

   1. Initial program 86.7%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t - \left(a \cdot 4\right) \cdot t\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot 4\right) \cdot i\right) - \left(j \cdot 27\right) \cdot k \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 85.5%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(b \cdot c - 4 \cdot \left(a \cdot t\right)\right)} - \left(x \cdot 4\right) \cdot i\right) - \left(j \cdot 27\right) \cdot k \]

   if 2.09999999999999994e154 < z

   1. Initial program 71.0%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t - \left(a \cdot 4\right) \cdot t\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot 4\right) \cdot i\right) - \left(j \cdot 27\right) \cdot k \]

   3. Simplified 80.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 18 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right), a \cdot -4\right), \mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, x \cdot \left(i \cdot -4\right)\right)\right) + j \cdot \left(k \cdot -27\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 74.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{18 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)\right)} + j \cdot \left(k \cdot -27\right) \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 74.4%

         \[\leadsto 18 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(t \cdot x\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} + j \cdot \left(k \cdot -27\right) \]

   7. Simplified 74.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{18 \cdot \left(\left(t \cdot x\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} + j \cdot \left(k \cdot -27\right) \]

   8. Taylor expanded in z around inf 80.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(-27 \cdot \frac{j \cdot k}{z} + 18 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 78.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.25 \cdot 10^{+21}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(-27 \cdot \frac{j \cdot k}{y} + 18 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 2.1 \cdot 10^{+154}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(\left(b \cdot c - 4 \cdot \left(t \cdot a\right)\right) - \left(x \cdot 4\right) \cdot i\right) - k \cdot \left(j \cdot 27\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(-27 \cdot \frac{j \cdot k}{z} + 18 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 72.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := 27 \cdot \left(j \cdot k\right)\\ t_2 := t \cdot \left(18 \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right) - a \cdot 4\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -5.4 \cdot 10^{+114}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq -7000000:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(b \cdot c + -4 \cdot \left(t \cdot a\right)\right) - t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 1.9 \cdot 10^{+108}:\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot c - \left(4 \cdot \left(x \cdot i\right) + t\_1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, and k should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i j k)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* 27.0 (* j k)))
        (t_2 (* t (- (* 18.0 (* x (* y z))) (* a 4.0)))))
   (if (<= t -5.4e+114)
     t_2
     (if (<= t -7000000.0)
       (- (+ (* b c) (* -4.0 (* t a))) t_1)
       (if (<= t 1.9e+108) (- (* b c) (+ (* 4.0 (* x i)) t_1)) t_2)))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i && i < j && j < k);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i, double j, double k) {
	double t_1 = 27.0 * (j * k);
	double t_2 = t * ((18.0 * (x * (y * z))) - (a * 4.0));
	double tmp;
	if (t <= -5.4e+114) {
		tmp = t_2;
	} else if (t <= -7000000.0) {
		tmp = ((b * c) + (-4.0 * (t * a))) - t_1;
	} else if (t <= 1.9e+108) {
		tmp = (b * c) - ((4.0 * (x * i)) + t_1);
	} else {
		tmp = t_2;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, and k should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8), intent (in) :: j
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: t_2
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = 27.0d0 * (j * k)
    t_2 = t * ((18.0d0 * (x * (y * z))) - (a * 4.0d0))
    if (t <= (-5.4d+114)) then
        tmp = t_2
    else if (t <= (-7000000.0d0)) then
        tmp = ((b * c) + ((-4.0d0) * (t * a))) - t_1
    else if (t <= 1.9d+108) then
        tmp = (b * c) - ((4.0d0 * (x * i)) + t_1)
    else
        tmp = t_2
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i && i < j && j < k;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i, double j, double k) {
	double t_1 = 27.0 * (j * k);
	double t_2 = t * ((18.0 * (x * (y * z))) - (a * 4.0));
	double tmp;
	if (t <= -5.4e+114) {
		tmp = t_2;
	} else if (t <= -7000000.0) {
		tmp = ((b * c) + (-4.0 * (t * a))) - t_1;
	} else if (t <= 1.9e+108) {
		tmp = (b * c) - ((4.0 * (x * i)) + t_1);
	} else {
		tmp = t_2;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k):
	t_1 = 27.0 * (j * k)
	t_2 = t * ((18.0 * (x * (y * z))) - (a * 4.0))
	tmp = 0
	if t <= -5.4e+114:
		tmp = t_2
	elif t <= -7000000.0:
		tmp = ((b * c) + (-4.0 * (t * a))) - t_1
	elif t <= 1.9e+108:
		tmp = (b * c) - ((4.0 * (x * i)) + t_1)
	else:
		tmp = t_2
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k)
	t_1 = Float64(27.0 * Float64(j * k))
	t_2 = Float64(t * Float64(Float64(18.0 * Float64(x * Float64(y * z))) - Float64(a * 4.0)))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t <= -5.4e+114)
		tmp = t_2;
	elseif (t <= -7000000.0)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(b * c) + Float64(-4.0 * Float64(t * a))) - t_1);
	elseif (t <= 1.9e+108)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(b * c) - Float64(Float64(4.0 * Float64(x * i)) + t_1));
	else
		tmp = t_2;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k)
	t_1 = 27.0 * (j * k);
	t_2 = t * ((18.0 * (x * (y * z))) - (a * 4.0));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t <= -5.4e+114)
		tmp = t_2;
	elseif (t <= -7000000.0)
		tmp = ((b * c) + (-4.0 * (t * a))) - t_1;
	elseif (t <= 1.9e+108)
		tmp = (b * c) - ((4.0 * (x * i)) + t_1);
	else
		tmp = t_2;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, and k should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_, j_, k_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(27.0 * N[(j * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[(t * N[(N[(18.0 * N[(x * N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(a * 4.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t, -5.4e+114], t$95$2, If[LessEqual[t, -7000000.0], N[(N[(N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision] + N[(-4.0 * N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t$95$1), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[t, 1.9e+108], N[(N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(4.0 * N[(x * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$2]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if t < -5.4000000000000001e114 or 1.90000000000000004e108 < t

   1. Initial program 74.2%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t - \left(a \cdot 4\right) \cdot t\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot 4\right) \cdot i\right) - \left(j \cdot 27\right) \cdot k \]

   3. Simplified 80.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) - a \cdot 4\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in t around inf 81.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(18 \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right) - 4 \cdot a\right)} \]

   if -5.4000000000000001e114 < t < -7e6

   1. Initial program 91.2%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t - \left(a \cdot 4\right) \cdot t\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot 4\right) \cdot i\right) - \left(j \cdot 27\right) \cdot k \]

   3. Simplified 91.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) - a \cdot 4\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 69.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-4 \cdot \left(a \cdot t\right) + b \cdot c\right) - 27 \cdot \left(j \cdot k\right)} \]

   if -7e6 < t < 1.90000000000000004e108

   1. Initial program 86.6%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t - \left(a \cdot 4\right) \cdot t\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot 4\right) \cdot i\right) - \left(j \cdot 27\right) \cdot k \]

   3. Simplified 89.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) - a \cdot 4\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in t around 0 78.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot c - \left(4 \cdot \left(i \cdot x\right) + 27 \cdot \left(j \cdot k\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 78.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -5.4 \cdot 10^{+114}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot \left(18 \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right) - a \cdot 4\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq -7000000:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(b \cdot c + -4 \cdot \left(t \cdot a\right)\right) - 27 \cdot \left(j \cdot k\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 1.9 \cdot 10^{+108}:\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot c - \left(4 \cdot \left(x \cdot i\right) + 27 \cdot \left(j \cdot k\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot \left(18 \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right) - a \cdot 4\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 48.9% accurate, 1.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := 18 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -3.55 \cdot 10^{+114}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 2.4 \cdot 10^{-105}:\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot c - k \cdot \left(j \cdot 27\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 1.8 \cdot 10^{+180}:\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot \left(c + -27 \cdot \left(j \cdot \frac{k}{b}\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 3.35 \cdot 10^{+212}:\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot c + -4 \cdot \left(t \cdot a\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, and k should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i j k)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* 18.0 (* t (* x (* y z))))))
   (if (<= t -3.55e+114)
     t_1
     (if (<= t 2.4e-105)
       (- (* b c) (* k (* j 27.0)))
       (if (<= t 1.8e+180)
         (* b (+ c (* -27.0 (* j (/ k b)))))
         (if (<= t 3.35e+212) (+ (* b c) (* -4.0 (* t a))) t_1))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i && i < j && j < k);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i, double j, double k) {
	double t_1 = 18.0 * (t * (x * (y * z)));
	double tmp;
	if (t <= -3.55e+114) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (t <= 2.4e-105) {
		tmp = (b * c) - (k * (j * 27.0));
	} else if (t <= 1.8e+180) {
		tmp = b * (c + (-27.0 * (j * (k / b))));
	} else if (t <= 3.35e+212) {
		tmp = (b * c) + (-4.0 * (t * a));
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, and k should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8), intent (in) :: j
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = 18.0d0 * (t * (x * (y * z)))
    if (t <= (-3.55d+114)) then
        tmp = t_1
    else if (t <= 2.4d-105) then
        tmp = (b * c) - (k * (j * 27.0d0))
    else if (t <= 1.8d+180) then
        tmp = b * (c + ((-27.0d0) * (j * (k / b))))
    else if (t <= 3.35d+212) then
        tmp = (b * c) + ((-4.0d0) * (t * a))
    else
        tmp = t_1
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i && i < j && j < k;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i, double j, double k) {
	double t_1 = 18.0 * (t * (x * (y * z)));
	double tmp;
	if (t <= -3.55e+114) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (t <= 2.4e-105) {
		tmp = (b * c) - (k * (j * 27.0));
	} else if (t <= 1.8e+180) {
		tmp = b * (c + (-27.0 * (j * (k / b))));
	} else if (t <= 3.35e+212) {
		tmp = (b * c) + (-4.0 * (t * a));
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k):
	t_1 = 18.0 * (t * (x * (y * z)))
	tmp = 0
	if t <= -3.55e+114:
		tmp = t_1
	elif t <= 2.4e-105:
		tmp = (b * c) - (k * (j * 27.0))
	elif t <= 1.8e+180:
		tmp = b * (c + (-27.0 * (j * (k / b))))
	elif t <= 3.35e+212:
		tmp = (b * c) + (-4.0 * (t * a))
	else:
		tmp = t_1
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k)
	t_1 = Float64(18.0 * Float64(t * Float64(x * Float64(y * z))))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t <= -3.55e+114)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (t <= 2.4e-105)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(b * c) - Float64(k * Float64(j * 27.0)));
	elseif (t <= 1.8e+180)
		tmp = Float64(b * Float64(c + Float64(-27.0 * Float64(j * Float64(k / b)))));
	elseif (t <= 3.35e+212)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(b * c) + Float64(-4.0 * Float64(t * a)));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k)
	t_1 = 18.0 * (t * (x * (y * z)));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t <= -3.55e+114)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (t <= 2.4e-105)
		tmp = (b * c) - (k * (j * 27.0));
	elseif (t <= 1.8e+180)
		tmp = b * (c + (-27.0 * (j * (k / b))));
	elseif (t <= 3.35e+212)
		tmp = (b * c) + (-4.0 * (t * a));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, and k should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_, j_, k_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(18.0 * N[(t * N[(x * N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t, -3.55e+114], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[t, 2.4e-105], N[(N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision] - N[(k * N[(j * 27.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[t, 1.8e+180], N[(b * N[(c + N[(-27.0 * N[(j * N[(k / b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[t, 3.35e+212], N[(N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision] + N[(-4.0 * N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 4 regimes

2. if t < -3.5500000000000001e114 or 3.3499999999999999e212 < t

   1. Initial program 73.0%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t - \left(a \cdot 4\right) \cdot t\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot 4\right) \cdot i\right) - \left(j \cdot 27\right) \cdot k \]

   3. Simplified 76.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) - a \cdot 4\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 75.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(18 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right) - 4 \cdot i\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around inf 75.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{18 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)\right)} \]

   if -3.5500000000000001e114 < t < 2.40000000000000015e-105

   1. Initial program 87.7%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t - \left(a \cdot 4\right) \cdot t\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot 4\right) \cdot i\right) - \left(j \cdot 27\right) \cdot k \]

   3. Simplified 91.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) - a \cdot 4\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in t around 0 77.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot c - \left(4 \cdot \left(i \cdot x\right) + 27 \cdot \left(j \cdot k\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in i around 0 60.4%

      \[\leadsto b \cdot c - \color{blue}{27 \cdot \left(j \cdot k\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 60.4%

         \[\leadsto b \cdot c - \color{blue}{\left(27 \cdot j\right) \cdot k} \]

      2. *-commutative 60.4%

         \[\leadsto b \cdot c - \color{blue}{\left(j \cdot 27\right)} \cdot k \]

      3. *-commutative 60.4%

         \[\leadsto b \cdot c - \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(j \cdot 27\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 60.4%

         \[\leadsto b \cdot c - k \cdot \color{blue}{\left(27 \cdot j\right)} \]

   8. Simplified 60.4%

      \[\leadsto b \cdot c - \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(27 \cdot j\right)} \]

   if 2.40000000000000015e-105 < t < 1.8000000000000001e180

   1. Initial program 83.5%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t - \left(a \cdot 4\right) \cdot t\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot 4\right) \cdot i\right) - \left(j \cdot 27\right) \cdot k \]

   3. Simplified 85.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) - a \cdot 4\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in t around 0 63.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot c - \left(4 \cdot \left(i \cdot x\right) + 27 \cdot \left(j \cdot k\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in i around 0 51.2%

      \[\leadsto b \cdot c - \color{blue}{27 \cdot \left(j \cdot k\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 51.2%

         \[\leadsto b \cdot c - \color{blue}{\left(27 \cdot j\right) \cdot k} \]

      2. *-commutative 51.2%

         \[\leadsto b \cdot c - \color{blue}{\left(j \cdot 27\right)} \cdot k \]

      3. *-commutative 51.2%

         \[\leadsto b \cdot c - \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(j \cdot 27\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 51.2%

         \[\leadsto b \cdot c - k \cdot \color{blue}{\left(27 \cdot j\right)} \]

   8. Simplified 51.2%

      \[\leadsto b \cdot c - \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(27 \cdot j\right)} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in b around inf 51.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot \left(c + -27 \cdot \frac{j \cdot k}{b}\right)} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

       1. *-commutative 51.3%

          \[\leadsto b \cdot \left(c + \color{blue}{\frac{j \cdot k}{b} \cdot -27}\right) \]

       2. associate-/l* 55.0%

          \[\leadsto b \cdot \left(c + \color{blue}{\left(j \cdot \frac{k}{b}\right)} \cdot -27\right) \]

   11. Simplified 55.0%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot \left(c + \left(j \cdot \frac{k}{b}\right) \cdot -27\right)} \]

   if 1.8000000000000001e180 < t < 3.3499999999999999e212

   1. Initial program 76.5%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t - \left(a \cdot 4\right) \cdot t\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot 4\right) \cdot i\right) - \left(j \cdot 27\right) \cdot k \]

   3. Simplified 87.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) - a \cdot 4\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 88.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-4 \cdot \left(a \cdot t\right) + b \cdot c\right) - 27 \cdot \left(j \cdot k\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in j around 0 88.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \left(a \cdot t\right) + b \cdot c} \]
3. Recombined 4 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 63.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -3.55 \cdot 10^{+114}:\\ \;\;\;\;18 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 2.4 \cdot 10^{-105}:\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot c - k \cdot \left(j \cdot 27\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 1.8 \cdot 10^{+180}:\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot \left(c + -27 \cdot \left(j \cdot \frac{k}{b}\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 3.35 \cdot 10^{+212}:\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot c + -4 \cdot \left(t \cdot a\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;18 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 44.2% accurate, 1.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := b \cdot c + -4 \cdot \left(t \cdot a\right)\\ t_2 := 18 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -6.2 \cdot 10^{-102}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 6 \cdot 10^{-70}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 3.65 \cdot 10^{-10}:\\ \;\;\;\;k \cdot \left(j \cdot -27\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1.8 \cdot 10^{+154}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, and k should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i j k)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ (* b c) (* -4.0 (* t a)))) (t_2 (* 18.0 (* t (* x (* y z))))))
   (if (<= z -6.2e-102)
     t_2
     (if (<= z 6e-70)
       t_1
       (if (<= z 3.65e-10) (* k (* j -27.0)) (if (<= z 1.8e+154) t_1 t_2))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i && i < j && j < k);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i, double j, double k) {
	double t_1 = (b * c) + (-4.0 * (t * a));
	double t_2 = 18.0 * (t * (x * (y * z)));
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -6.2e-102) {
		tmp = t_2;
	} else if (z <= 6e-70) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (z <= 3.65e-10) {
		tmp = k * (j * -27.0);
	} else if (z <= 1.8e+154) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = t_2;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, and k should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8), intent (in) :: j
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: t_2
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = (b * c) + ((-4.0d0) * (t * a))
    t_2 = 18.0d0 * (t * (x * (y * z)))
    if (z <= (-6.2d-102)) then
        tmp = t_2
    else if (z <= 6d-70) then
        tmp = t_1
    else if (z <= 3.65d-10) then
        tmp = k * (j * (-27.0d0))
    else if (z <= 1.8d+154) then
        tmp = t_1
    else
        tmp = t_2
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i && i < j && j < k;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i, double j, double k) {
	double t_1 = (b * c) + (-4.0 * (t * a));
	double t_2 = 18.0 * (t * (x * (y * z)));
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -6.2e-102) {
		tmp = t_2;
	} else if (z <= 6e-70) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (z <= 3.65e-10) {
		tmp = k * (j * -27.0);
	} else if (z <= 1.8e+154) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = t_2;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k):
	t_1 = (b * c) + (-4.0 * (t * a))
	t_2 = 18.0 * (t * (x * (y * z)))
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -6.2e-102:
		tmp = t_2
	elif z <= 6e-70:
		tmp = t_1
	elif z <= 3.65e-10:
		tmp = k * (j * -27.0)
	elif z <= 1.8e+154:
		tmp = t_1
	else:
		tmp = t_2
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(b * c) + Float64(-4.0 * Float64(t * a)))
	t_2 = Float64(18.0 * Float64(t * Float64(x * Float64(y * z))))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -6.2e-102)
		tmp = t_2;
	elseif (z <= 6e-70)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (z <= 3.65e-10)
		tmp = Float64(k * Float64(j * -27.0));
	elseif (z <= 1.8e+154)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = t_2;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k)
	t_1 = (b * c) + (-4.0 * (t * a));
	t_2 = 18.0 * (t * (x * (y * z)));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -6.2e-102)
		tmp = t_2;
	elseif (z <= 6e-70)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (z <= 3.65e-10)
		tmp = k * (j * -27.0);
	elseif (z <= 1.8e+154)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = t_2;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, and k should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_, j_, k_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision] + N[(-4.0 * N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[(18.0 * N[(t * N[(x * N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[z, -6.2e-102], t$95$2, If[LessEqual[z, 6e-70], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[z, 3.65e-10], N[(k * N[(j * -27.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 1.8e+154], t$95$1, t$95$2]]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if z < -6.20000000000000026e-102 or 1.8e154 < z

   1. Initial program 78.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t - \left(a \cdot 4\right) \cdot t\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot 4\right) \cdot i\right) - \left(j \cdot 27\right) \cdot k \]

   3. Simplified 81.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) - a \cdot 4\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 52.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(18 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right) - 4 \cdot i\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around inf 44.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{18 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)\right)} \]

   if -6.20000000000000026e-102 < z < 6.0000000000000003e-70 or 3.6499999999999998e-10 < z < 1.8e154

   1. Initial program 88.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t - \left(a \cdot 4\right) \cdot t\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot 4\right) \cdot i\right) - \left(j \cdot 27\right) \cdot k \]

   3. Simplified 94.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) - a \cdot 4\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 68.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-4 \cdot \left(a \cdot t\right) + b \cdot c\right) - 27 \cdot \left(j \cdot k\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in j around 0 45.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \left(a \cdot t\right) + b \cdot c} \]

   if 6.0000000000000003e-70 < z < 3.6499999999999998e-10

   1. Initial program 71.2%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t - \left(a \cdot 4\right) \cdot t\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot 4\right) \cdot i\right) - \left(j \cdot 27\right) \cdot k \]

   3. Simplified 71.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) - a \cdot 4\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 71.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(t \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot z} - a \cdot 4\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      2. distribute-rgt-out-- 71.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t - \left(a \cdot 4\right) \cdot t\right)} + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      3. sub-neg 71.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t + \left(-\left(a \cdot 4\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      4. associate-*l* 71.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)} + \left(-\left(a \cdot 4\right) \cdot t\right)\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      5. *-commutative 71.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(x \cdot 18\right)\right)} \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right) + \left(-\left(a \cdot 4\right) \cdot t\right)\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      6. *-commutative 71.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(y \cdot \left(x \cdot 18\right)\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right) + \left(-\color{blue}{t \cdot \left(a \cdot 4\right)}\right)\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 71.4%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(y \cdot \left(x \cdot 18\right)\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right) + \left(-t \cdot \left(a \cdot 4\right)\right)\right)} + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 71.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(y \cdot \left(x \cdot 18\right)\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right) - t \cdot \left(a \cdot 4\right)\right)} + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      2. associate-*l* 71.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right)} - t \cdot \left(a \cdot 4\right)\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      3. associate-*r* 71.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(y \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) - \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot a\right) \cdot 4}\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      4. *-commutative 71.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(y \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) - \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot t\right)} \cdot 4\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      5. *-commutative 71.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(y \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) - \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(a \cdot t\right)}\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      6. fma-neg 71.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right), -4 \cdot \left(a \cdot t\right)\right)} + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      7. *-commutative 71.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z\right)}, -4 \cdot \left(a \cdot t\right)\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      8. distribute-lft-neg-in 71.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right), \color{blue}{\left(-4\right) \cdot \left(a \cdot t\right)}\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      9. metadata-eval 71.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right), \color{blue}{-4} \cdot \left(a \cdot t\right)\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      10. *-commutative 71.4%

          \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right), -4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot a\right)}\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

   8. Simplified 71.4%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right), -4 \cdot \left(t \cdot a\right)\right)} + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-undefine 71.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)\right) + -4 \cdot \left(t \cdot a\right)\right)} + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

   10. Applied egg-rr 71.4%

       \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)\right) + -4 \cdot \left(t \cdot a\right)\right)} + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

   11. Taylor expanded in j around inf 71.7%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-27 \cdot \left(j \cdot k\right)} \]
   12. Step-by-step derivation

       1. *-commutative 71.7%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(j \cdot k\right) \cdot -27} \]

       2. *-commutative 71.7%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(k \cdot j\right)} \cdot -27 \]

       3. associate-*r* 71.7%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(j \cdot -27\right)} \]

   13. Simplified 71.7%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(j \cdot -27\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 45.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -6.2 \cdot 10^{-102}:\\ \;\;\;\;18 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 6 \cdot 10^{-70}:\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot c + -4 \cdot \left(t \cdot a\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 3.65 \cdot 10^{-10}:\\ \;\;\;\;k \cdot \left(j \cdot -27\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1.8 \cdot 10^{+154}:\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot c + -4 \cdot \left(t \cdot a\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;18 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 58.2% accurate, 1.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := t \cdot \left(18 \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right) - a \cdot 4\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -2.05 \cdot 10^{-5}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq -4 \cdot 10^{-233}:\\ \;\;\;\;j \cdot \left(k \cdot -27\right) + -4 \cdot \left(x \cdot i\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 1.05 \cdot 10^{+39}:\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot \left(c + -27 \cdot \left(j \cdot \frac{k}{b}\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, and k should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i j k)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* t (- (* 18.0 (* x (* y z))) (* a 4.0)))))
   (if (<= t -2.05e-5)
     t_1
     (if (<= t -4e-233)
       (+ (* j (* k -27.0)) (* -4.0 (* x i)))
       (if (<= t 1.05e+39) (* b (+ c (* -27.0 (* j (/ k b))))) t_1)))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i && i < j && j < k);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i, double j, double k) {
	double t_1 = t * ((18.0 * (x * (y * z))) - (a * 4.0));
	double tmp;
	if (t <= -2.05e-5) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (t <= -4e-233) {
		tmp = (j * (k * -27.0)) + (-4.0 * (x * i));
	} else if (t <= 1.05e+39) {
		tmp = b * (c + (-27.0 * (j * (k / b))));
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, and k should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8), intent (in) :: j
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = t * ((18.0d0 * (x * (y * z))) - (a * 4.0d0))
    if (t <= (-2.05d-5)) then
        tmp = t_1
    else if (t <= (-4d-233)) then
        tmp = (j * (k * (-27.0d0))) + ((-4.0d0) * (x * i))
    else if (t <= 1.05d+39) then
        tmp = b * (c + ((-27.0d0) * (j * (k / b))))
    else
        tmp = t_1
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i && i < j && j < k;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i, double j, double k) {
	double t_1 = t * ((18.0 * (x * (y * z))) - (a * 4.0));
	double tmp;
	if (t <= -2.05e-5) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (t <= -4e-233) {
		tmp = (j * (k * -27.0)) + (-4.0 * (x * i));
	} else if (t <= 1.05e+39) {
		tmp = b * (c + (-27.0 * (j * (k / b))));
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k):
	t_1 = t * ((18.0 * (x * (y * z))) - (a * 4.0))
	tmp = 0
	if t <= -2.05e-5:
		tmp = t_1
	elif t <= -4e-233:
		tmp = (j * (k * -27.0)) + (-4.0 * (x * i))
	elif t <= 1.05e+39:
		tmp = b * (c + (-27.0 * (j * (k / b))))
	else:
		tmp = t_1
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k)
	t_1 = Float64(t * Float64(Float64(18.0 * Float64(x * Float64(y * z))) - Float64(a * 4.0)))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t <= -2.05e-5)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (t <= -4e-233)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(j * Float64(k * -27.0)) + Float64(-4.0 * Float64(x * i)));
	elseif (t <= 1.05e+39)
		tmp = Float64(b * Float64(c + Float64(-27.0 * Float64(j * Float64(k / b)))));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k)
	t_1 = t * ((18.0 * (x * (y * z))) - (a * 4.0));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t <= -2.05e-5)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (t <= -4e-233)
		tmp = (j * (k * -27.0)) + (-4.0 * (x * i));
	elseif (t <= 1.05e+39)
		tmp = b * (c + (-27.0 * (j * (k / b))));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, and k should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_, j_, k_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(t * N[(N[(18.0 * N[(x * N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(a * 4.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t, -2.05e-5], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[t, -4e-233], N[(N[(j * N[(k * -27.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(-4.0 * N[(x * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[t, 1.05e+39], N[(b * N[(c + N[(-27.0 * N[(j * N[(k / b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if t < -2.05000000000000002e-5 or 1.0499999999999999e39 < t

   1. Initial program 79.1%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t - \left(a \cdot 4\right) \cdot t\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot 4\right) \cdot i\right) - \left(j \cdot 27\right) \cdot k \]

   3. Simplified 83.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) - a \cdot 4\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in t around inf 71.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(18 \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right) - 4 \cdot a\right)} \]

   if -2.05000000000000002e-5 < t < -3.99999999999999983e-233

   1. Initial program 82.7%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t - \left(a \cdot 4\right) \cdot t\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot 4\right) \cdot i\right) - \left(j \cdot 27\right) \cdot k \]

   3. Simplified 94.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 18 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right), a \cdot -4\right), \mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, x \cdot \left(i \cdot -4\right)\right)\right) + j \cdot \left(k \cdot -27\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in i around inf 59.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \left(i \cdot x\right)} + j \cdot \left(k \cdot -27\right) \]

   if -3.99999999999999983e-233 < t < 1.0499999999999999e39

   1. Initial program 88.7%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t - \left(a \cdot 4\right) \cdot t\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot 4\right) \cdot i\right) - \left(j \cdot 27\right) \cdot k \]

   3. Simplified 86.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) - a \cdot 4\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in t around 0 80.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot c - \left(4 \cdot \left(i \cdot x\right) + 27 \cdot \left(j \cdot k\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in i around 0 66.0%

      \[\leadsto b \cdot c - \color{blue}{27 \cdot \left(j \cdot k\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 66.1%

         \[\leadsto b \cdot c - \color{blue}{\left(27 \cdot j\right) \cdot k} \]

      2. *-commutative 66.1%

         \[\leadsto b \cdot c - \color{blue}{\left(j \cdot 27\right)} \cdot k \]

      3. *-commutative 66.1%

         \[\leadsto b \cdot c - \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(j \cdot 27\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 66.1%

         \[\leadsto b \cdot c - k \cdot \color{blue}{\left(27 \cdot j\right)} \]

   8. Simplified 66.1%

      \[\leadsto b \cdot c - \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(27 \cdot j\right)} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in b around inf 62.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot \left(c + -27 \cdot \frac{j \cdot k}{b}\right)} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

       1. *-commutative 62.5%

          \[\leadsto b \cdot \left(c + \color{blue}{\frac{j \cdot k}{b} \cdot -27}\right) \]

       2. associate-/l* 64.5%

          \[\leadsto b \cdot \left(c + \color{blue}{\left(j \cdot \frac{k}{b}\right)} \cdot -27\right) \]

   11. Simplified 64.5%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot \left(c + \left(j \cdot \frac{k}{b}\right) \cdot -27\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 66.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -2.05 \cdot 10^{-5}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot \left(18 \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right) - a \cdot 4\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq -4 \cdot 10^{-233}:\\ \;\;\;\;j \cdot \left(k \cdot -27\right) + -4 \cdot \left(x \cdot i\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 1.05 \cdot 10^{+39}:\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot \left(c + -27 \cdot \left(j \cdot \frac{k}{b}\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot \left(18 \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right) - a \cdot 4\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 71.9% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -2800000 \lor \neg \left(t \leq 1.12 \cdot 10^{+108}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot \left(18 \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right) - a \cdot 4\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot c - \left(4 \cdot \left(x \cdot i\right) + 27 \cdot \left(j \cdot k\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, and k should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i j k)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= t -2800000.0) (not (<= t 1.12e+108)))
   (* t (- (* 18.0 (* x (* y z))) (* a 4.0)))
   (- (* b c) (+ (* 4.0 (* x i)) (* 27.0 (* j k))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i && i < j && j < k);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i, double j, double k) {
	double tmp;
	if ((t <= -2800000.0) || !(t <= 1.12e+108)) {
		tmp = t * ((18.0 * (x * (y * z))) - (a * 4.0));
	} else {
		tmp = (b * c) - ((4.0 * (x * i)) + (27.0 * (j * k)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, and k should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8), intent (in) :: j
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((t <= (-2800000.0d0)) .or. (.not. (t <= 1.12d+108))) then
        tmp = t * ((18.0d0 * (x * (y * z))) - (a * 4.0d0))
    else
        tmp = (b * c) - ((4.0d0 * (x * i)) + (27.0d0 * (j * k)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i && i < j && j < k;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i, double j, double k) {
	double tmp;
	if ((t <= -2800000.0) || !(t <= 1.12e+108)) {
		tmp = t * ((18.0 * (x * (y * z))) - (a * 4.0));
	} else {
		tmp = (b * c) - ((4.0 * (x * i)) + (27.0 * (j * k)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k):
	tmp = 0
	if (t <= -2800000.0) or not (t <= 1.12e+108):
		tmp = t * ((18.0 * (x * (y * z))) - (a * 4.0))
	else:
		tmp = (b * c) - ((4.0 * (x * i)) + (27.0 * (j * k)))
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((t <= -2800000.0) || !(t <= 1.12e+108))
		tmp = Float64(t * Float64(Float64(18.0 * Float64(x * Float64(y * z))) - Float64(a * 4.0)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(b * c) - Float64(Float64(4.0 * Float64(x * i)) + Float64(27.0 * Float64(j * k))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((t <= -2800000.0) || ~((t <= 1.12e+108)))
		tmp = t * ((18.0 * (x * (y * z))) - (a * 4.0));
	else
		tmp = (b * c) - ((4.0 * (x * i)) + (27.0 * (j * k)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, and k should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_, j_, k_] := If[Or[LessEqual[t, -2800000.0], N[Not[LessEqual[t, 1.12e+108]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(t * N[(N[(18.0 * N[(x * N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(a * 4.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(4.0 * N[(x * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(27.0 * N[(j * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if t < -2.8e6 or 1.11999999999999994e108 < t

   1. Initial program 78.4%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t - \left(a \cdot 4\right) \cdot t\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot 4\right) \cdot i\right) - \left(j \cdot 27\right) \cdot k \]

   3. Simplified 83.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) - a \cdot 4\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in t around inf 74.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(18 \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right) - 4 \cdot a\right)} \]

   if -2.8e6 < t < 1.11999999999999994e108

   1. Initial program 86.5%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t - \left(a \cdot 4\right) \cdot t\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot 4\right) \cdot i\right) - \left(j \cdot 27\right) \cdot k \]

   3. Simplified 89.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) - a \cdot 4\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in t around 0 78.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot c - \left(4 \cdot \left(i \cdot x\right) + 27 \cdot \left(j \cdot k\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 76.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -2800000 \lor \neg \left(t \leq 1.12 \cdot 10^{+108}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot \left(18 \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right) - a \cdot 4\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot c - \left(4 \cdot \left(x \cdot i\right) + 27 \cdot \left(j \cdot k\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 12: 50.4% accurate, 1.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := 18 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -2.35 \cdot 10^{+114}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 7 \cdot 10^{-40}:\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot c - k \cdot \left(j \cdot 27\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 1.6 \cdot 10^{+213}:\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot c + -4 \cdot \left(t \cdot a\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, and k should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i j k)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* 18.0 (* t (* x (* y z))))))
   (if (<= t -2.35e+114)
     t_1
     (if (<= t 7e-40)
       (- (* b c) (* k (* j 27.0)))
       (if (<= t 1.6e+213) (+ (* b c) (* -4.0 (* t a))) t_1)))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i && i < j && j < k);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i, double j, double k) {
	double t_1 = 18.0 * (t * (x * (y * z)));
	double tmp;
	if (t <= -2.35e+114) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (t <= 7e-40) {
		tmp = (b * c) - (k * (j * 27.0));
	} else if (t <= 1.6e+213) {
		tmp = (b * c) + (-4.0 * (t * a));
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, and k should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8), intent (in) :: j
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = 18.0d0 * (t * (x * (y * z)))
    if (t <= (-2.35d+114)) then
        tmp = t_1
    else if (t <= 7d-40) then
        tmp = (b * c) - (k * (j * 27.0d0))
    else if (t <= 1.6d+213) then
        tmp = (b * c) + ((-4.0d0) * (t * a))
    else
        tmp = t_1
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i && i < j && j < k;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i, double j, double k) {
	double t_1 = 18.0 * (t * (x * (y * z)));
	double tmp;
	if (t <= -2.35e+114) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (t <= 7e-40) {
		tmp = (b * c) - (k * (j * 27.0));
	} else if (t <= 1.6e+213) {
		tmp = (b * c) + (-4.0 * (t * a));
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k):
	t_1 = 18.0 * (t * (x * (y * z)))
	tmp = 0
	if t <= -2.35e+114:
		tmp = t_1
	elif t <= 7e-40:
		tmp = (b * c) - (k * (j * 27.0))
	elif t <= 1.6e+213:
		tmp = (b * c) + (-4.0 * (t * a))
	else:
		tmp = t_1
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k)
	t_1 = Float64(18.0 * Float64(t * Float64(x * Float64(y * z))))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t <= -2.35e+114)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (t <= 7e-40)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(b * c) - Float64(k * Float64(j * 27.0)));
	elseif (t <= 1.6e+213)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(b * c) + Float64(-4.0 * Float64(t * a)));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k)
	t_1 = 18.0 * (t * (x * (y * z)));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t <= -2.35e+114)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (t <= 7e-40)
		tmp = (b * c) - (k * (j * 27.0));
	elseif (t <= 1.6e+213)
		tmp = (b * c) + (-4.0 * (t * a));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, and k should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_, j_, k_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(18.0 * N[(t * N[(x * N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t, -2.35e+114], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[t, 7e-40], N[(N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision] - N[(k * N[(j * 27.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[t, 1.6e+213], N[(N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision] + N[(-4.0 * N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if t < -2.35e114 or 1.5999999999999999e213 < t

   1. Initial program 73.0%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t - \left(a \cdot 4\right) \cdot t\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot 4\right) \cdot i\right) - \left(j \cdot 27\right) \cdot k \]

   3. Simplified 76.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) - a \cdot 4\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 75.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(18 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right) - 4 \cdot i\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around inf 75.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{18 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)\right)} \]

   if -2.35e114 < t < 7.0000000000000003e-40

   1. Initial program 88.5%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t - \left(a \cdot 4\right) \cdot t\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot 4\right) \cdot i\right) - \left(j \cdot 27\right) \cdot k \]

   3. Simplified 92.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) - a \cdot 4\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in t around 0 77.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot c - \left(4 \cdot \left(i \cdot x\right) + 27 \cdot \left(j \cdot k\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in i around 0 59.3%

      \[\leadsto b \cdot c - \color{blue}{27 \cdot \left(j \cdot k\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 59.4%

         \[\leadsto b \cdot c - \color{blue}{\left(27 \cdot j\right) \cdot k} \]

      2. *-commutative 59.4%

         \[\leadsto b \cdot c - \color{blue}{\left(j \cdot 27\right)} \cdot k \]

      3. *-commutative 59.4%

         \[\leadsto b \cdot c - \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(j \cdot 27\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 59.4%

         \[\leadsto b \cdot c - k \cdot \color{blue}{\left(27 \cdot j\right)} \]

   8. Simplified 59.4%

      \[\leadsto b \cdot c - \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(27 \cdot j\right)} \]

   if 7.0000000000000003e-40 < t < 1.5999999999999999e213

   1. Initial program 77.7%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t - \left(a \cdot 4\right) \cdot t\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot 4\right) \cdot i\right) - \left(j \cdot 27\right) \cdot k \]

   3. Simplified 82.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) - a \cdot 4\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 64.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-4 \cdot \left(a \cdot t\right) + b \cdot c\right) - 27 \cdot \left(j \cdot k\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in j around 0 58.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \left(a \cdot t\right) + b \cdot c} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 62.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -2.35 \cdot 10^{+114}:\\ \;\;\;\;18 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 7 \cdot 10^{-40}:\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot c - k \cdot \left(j \cdot 27\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 1.6 \cdot 10^{+213}:\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot c + -4 \cdot \left(t \cdot a\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;18 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 13: 50.2% accurate, 1.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := 18 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -4.3 \cdot 10^{+112}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 1.8 \cdot 10^{-40}:\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot c + j \cdot \left(k \cdot -27\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 1.25 \cdot 10^{+213}:\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot c + -4 \cdot \left(t \cdot a\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, and k should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i j k)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* 18.0 (* t (* x (* y z))))))
   (if (<= t -4.3e+112)
     t_1
     (if (<= t 1.8e-40)
       (+ (* b c) (* j (* k -27.0)))
       (if (<= t 1.25e+213) (+ (* b c) (* -4.0 (* t a))) t_1)))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i && i < j && j < k);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i, double j, double k) {
	double t_1 = 18.0 * (t * (x * (y * z)));
	double tmp;
	if (t <= -4.3e+112) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (t <= 1.8e-40) {
		tmp = (b * c) + (j * (k * -27.0));
	} else if (t <= 1.25e+213) {
		tmp = (b * c) + (-4.0 * (t * a));
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, and k should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8), intent (in) :: j
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = 18.0d0 * (t * (x * (y * z)))
    if (t <= (-4.3d+112)) then
        tmp = t_1
    else if (t <= 1.8d-40) then
        tmp = (b * c) + (j * (k * (-27.0d0)))
    else if (t <= 1.25d+213) then
        tmp = (b * c) + ((-4.0d0) * (t * a))
    else
        tmp = t_1
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i && i < j && j < k;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i, double j, double k) {
	double t_1 = 18.0 * (t * (x * (y * z)));
	double tmp;
	if (t <= -4.3e+112) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (t <= 1.8e-40) {
		tmp = (b * c) + (j * (k * -27.0));
	} else if (t <= 1.25e+213) {
		tmp = (b * c) + (-4.0 * (t * a));
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k):
	t_1 = 18.0 * (t * (x * (y * z)))
	tmp = 0
	if t <= -4.3e+112:
		tmp = t_1
	elif t <= 1.8e-40:
		tmp = (b * c) + (j * (k * -27.0))
	elif t <= 1.25e+213:
		tmp = (b * c) + (-4.0 * (t * a))
	else:
		tmp = t_1
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k)
	t_1 = Float64(18.0 * Float64(t * Float64(x * Float64(y * z))))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t <= -4.3e+112)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (t <= 1.8e-40)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(b * c) + Float64(j * Float64(k * -27.0)));
	elseif (t <= 1.25e+213)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(b * c) + Float64(-4.0 * Float64(t * a)));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k)
	t_1 = 18.0 * (t * (x * (y * z)));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t <= -4.3e+112)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (t <= 1.8e-40)
		tmp = (b * c) + (j * (k * -27.0));
	elseif (t <= 1.25e+213)
		tmp = (b * c) + (-4.0 * (t * a));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, and k should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_, j_, k_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(18.0 * N[(t * N[(x * N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t, -4.3e+112], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[t, 1.8e-40], N[(N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision] + N[(j * N[(k * -27.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[t, 1.25e+213], N[(N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision] + N[(-4.0 * N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if t < -4.29999999999999983e112 or 1.2499999999999999e213 < t

   1. Initial program 73.0%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t - \left(a \cdot 4\right) \cdot t\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot 4\right) \cdot i\right) - \left(j \cdot 27\right) \cdot k \]

   3. Simplified 76.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) - a \cdot 4\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 75.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(18 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right) - 4 \cdot i\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around inf 75.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{18 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)\right)} \]

   if -4.29999999999999983e112 < t < 1.8e-40

   1. Initial program 88.5%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t - \left(a \cdot 4\right) \cdot t\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot 4\right) \cdot i\right) - \left(j \cdot 27\right) \cdot k \]

   3. Simplified 92.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 18 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right), a \cdot -4\right), \mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, x \cdot \left(i \cdot -4\right)\right)\right) + j \cdot \left(k \cdot -27\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in b around inf 59.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot c} + j \cdot \left(k \cdot -27\right) \]

   if 1.8e-40 < t < 1.2499999999999999e213

   1. Initial program 77.7%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t - \left(a \cdot 4\right) \cdot t\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot 4\right) \cdot i\right) - \left(j \cdot 27\right) \cdot k \]

   3. Simplified 82.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) - a \cdot 4\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 64.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-4 \cdot \left(a \cdot t\right) + b \cdot c\right) - 27 \cdot \left(j \cdot k\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in j around 0 58.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \left(a \cdot t\right) + b \cdot c} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 62.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -4.3 \cdot 10^{+112}:\\ \;\;\;\;18 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 1.8 \cdot 10^{-40}:\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot c + j \cdot \left(k \cdot -27\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 1.25 \cdot 10^{+213}:\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot c + -4 \cdot \left(t \cdot a\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;18 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 14: 32.5% accurate, 1.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := 18 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.46 \cdot 10^{-124}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 8.5 \cdot 10^{-141}:\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot c\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 2.8 \cdot 10^{+67}:\\ \;\;\;\;k \cdot \left(j \cdot -27\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, and k should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i j k)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* 18.0 (* t (* x (* y z))))))
   (if (<= z -1.46e-124)
     t_1
     (if (<= z 8.5e-141) (* b c) (if (<= z 2.8e+67) (* k (* j -27.0)) t_1)))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i && i < j && j < k);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i, double j, double k) {
	double t_1 = 18.0 * (t * (x * (y * z)));
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -1.46e-124) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (z <= 8.5e-141) {
		tmp = b * c;
	} else if (z <= 2.8e+67) {
		tmp = k * (j * -27.0);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, and k should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8), intent (in) :: j
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = 18.0d0 * (t * (x * (y * z)))
    if (z <= (-1.46d-124)) then
        tmp = t_1
    else if (z <= 8.5d-141) then
        tmp = b * c
    else if (z <= 2.8d+67) then
        tmp = k * (j * (-27.0d0))
    else
        tmp = t_1
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i && i < j && j < k;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i, double j, double k) {
	double t_1 = 18.0 * (t * (x * (y * z)));
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -1.46e-124) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (z <= 8.5e-141) {
		tmp = b * c;
	} else if (z <= 2.8e+67) {
		tmp = k * (j * -27.0);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k):
	t_1 = 18.0 * (t * (x * (y * z)))
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -1.46e-124:
		tmp = t_1
	elif z <= 8.5e-141:
		tmp = b * c
	elif z <= 2.8e+67:
		tmp = k * (j * -27.0)
	else:
		tmp = t_1
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k)
	t_1 = Float64(18.0 * Float64(t * Float64(x * Float64(y * z))))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -1.46e-124)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (z <= 8.5e-141)
		tmp = Float64(b * c);
	elseif (z <= 2.8e+67)
		tmp = Float64(k * Float64(j * -27.0));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k)
	t_1 = 18.0 * (t * (x * (y * z)));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -1.46e-124)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (z <= 8.5e-141)
		tmp = b * c;
	elseif (z <= 2.8e+67)
		tmp = k * (j * -27.0);
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, and k should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_, j_, k_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(18.0 * N[(t * N[(x * N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[z, -1.46e-124], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[z, 8.5e-141], N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 2.8e+67], N[(k * N[(j * -27.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if z < -1.4599999999999999e-124 or 2.7999999999999998e67 < z

   1. Initial program 80.1%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t - \left(a \cdot 4\right) \cdot t\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot 4\right) \cdot i\right) - \left(j \cdot 27\right) \cdot k \]

   3. Simplified 82.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) - a \cdot 4\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 54.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(18 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right) - 4 \cdot i\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around inf 45.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{18 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)\right)} \]

   if -1.4599999999999999e-124 < z < 8.50000000000000021e-141

   1. Initial program 86.4%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t - \left(a \cdot 4\right) \cdot t\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot 4\right) \cdot i\right) - \left(j \cdot 27\right) \cdot k \]

   3. Simplified 93.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) - a \cdot 4\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 86.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(t \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot z} - a \cdot 4\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      2. distribute-rgt-out-- 86.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t - \left(a \cdot 4\right) \cdot t\right)} + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      3. sub-neg 86.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t + \left(-\left(a \cdot 4\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      4. associate-*l* 86.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)} + \left(-\left(a \cdot 4\right) \cdot t\right)\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      5. *-commutative 86.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(x \cdot 18\right)\right)} \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right) + \left(-\left(a \cdot 4\right) \cdot t\right)\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      6. *-commutative 86.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(y \cdot \left(x \cdot 18\right)\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right) + \left(-\color{blue}{t \cdot \left(a \cdot 4\right)}\right)\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 86.3%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(y \cdot \left(x \cdot 18\right)\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right) + \left(-t \cdot \left(a \cdot 4\right)\right)\right)} + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 86.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(y \cdot \left(x \cdot 18\right)\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right) - t \cdot \left(a \cdot 4\right)\right)} + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      2. associate-*l* 93.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right)} - t \cdot \left(a \cdot 4\right)\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      3. associate-*r* 93.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(y \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) - \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot a\right) \cdot 4}\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      4. *-commutative 93.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(y \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) - \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot t\right)} \cdot 4\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      5. *-commutative 93.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(y \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) - \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(a \cdot t\right)}\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      6. fma-neg 93.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right), -4 \cdot \left(a \cdot t\right)\right)} + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      7. *-commutative 93.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z\right)}, -4 \cdot \left(a \cdot t\right)\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      8. distribute-lft-neg-in 93.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right), \color{blue}{\left(-4\right) \cdot \left(a \cdot t\right)}\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      9. metadata-eval 93.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right), \color{blue}{-4} \cdot \left(a \cdot t\right)\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      10. *-commutative 93.6%

          \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right), -4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot a\right)}\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

   8. Simplified 93.6%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right), -4 \cdot \left(t \cdot a\right)\right)} + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

   9. Taylor expanded in b around inf 36.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot c} \]

   if 8.50000000000000021e-141 < z < 2.7999999999999998e67

   1. Initial program 91.2%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t - \left(a \cdot 4\right) \cdot t\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot 4\right) \cdot i\right) - \left(j \cdot 27\right) \cdot k \]

   3. Simplified 93.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) - a \cdot 4\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 91.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(t \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot z} - a \cdot 4\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      2. distribute-rgt-out-- 91.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t - \left(a \cdot 4\right) \cdot t\right)} + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      3. sub-neg 91.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t + \left(-\left(a \cdot 4\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      4. associate-*l* 91.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)} + \left(-\left(a \cdot 4\right) \cdot t\right)\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      5. *-commutative 91.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(x \cdot 18\right)\right)} \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right) + \left(-\left(a \cdot 4\right) \cdot t\right)\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      6. *-commutative 91.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(y \cdot \left(x \cdot 18\right)\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right) + \left(-\color{blue}{t \cdot \left(a \cdot 4\right)}\right)\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 91.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(y \cdot \left(x \cdot 18\right)\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right) + \left(-t \cdot \left(a \cdot 4\right)\right)\right)} + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 91.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(y \cdot \left(x \cdot 18\right)\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right) - t \cdot \left(a \cdot 4\right)\right)} + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      2. associate-*l* 93.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right)} - t \cdot \left(a \cdot 4\right)\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      3. associate-*r* 93.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(y \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) - \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot a\right) \cdot 4}\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      4. *-commutative 93.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(y \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) - \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot t\right)} \cdot 4\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      5. *-commutative 93.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(y \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) - \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(a \cdot t\right)}\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      6. fma-neg 93.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right), -4 \cdot \left(a \cdot t\right)\right)} + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      7. *-commutative 93.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z\right)}, -4 \cdot \left(a \cdot t\right)\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      8. distribute-lft-neg-in 93.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right), \color{blue}{\left(-4\right) \cdot \left(a \cdot t\right)}\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      9. metadata-eval 93.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right), \color{blue}{-4} \cdot \left(a \cdot t\right)\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      10. *-commutative 93.9%

          \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right), -4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot a\right)}\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

   8. Simplified 93.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right), -4 \cdot \left(t \cdot a\right)\right)} + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-undefine 93.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)\right) + -4 \cdot \left(t \cdot a\right)\right)} + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

   10. Applied egg-rr 93.9%

       \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)\right) + -4 \cdot \left(t \cdot a\right)\right)} + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

   11. Taylor expanded in j around inf 34.5%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-27 \cdot \left(j \cdot k\right)} \]
   12. Step-by-step derivation

       1. *-commutative 34.5%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(j \cdot k\right) \cdot -27} \]

       2. *-commutative 34.5%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(k \cdot j\right)} \cdot -27 \]

       3. associate-*r* 34.5%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(j \cdot -27\right)} \]

   13. Simplified 34.5%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(j \cdot -27\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 15: 32.7% accurate, 2.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;k \leq -2.4 \cdot 10^{-79} \lor \neg \left(k \leq 8.5 \cdot 10^{+132}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;-27 \cdot \left(j \cdot k\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot c\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, and k should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i j k)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= k -2.4e-79) (not (<= k 8.5e+132))) (* -27.0 (* j k)) (* b c)))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i && i < j && j < k);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i, double j, double k) {
	double tmp;
	if ((k <= -2.4e-79) || !(k <= 8.5e+132)) {
		tmp = -27.0 * (j * k);
	} else {
		tmp = b * c;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, and k should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8), intent (in) :: j
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((k <= (-2.4d-79)) .or. (.not. (k <= 8.5d+132))) then
        tmp = (-27.0d0) * (j * k)
    else
        tmp = b * c
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i && i < j && j < k;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i, double j, double k) {
	double tmp;
	if ((k <= -2.4e-79) || !(k <= 8.5e+132)) {
		tmp = -27.0 * (j * k);
	} else {
		tmp = b * c;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k):
	tmp = 0
	if (k <= -2.4e-79) or not (k <= 8.5e+132):
		tmp = -27.0 * (j * k)
	else:
		tmp = b * c
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((k <= -2.4e-79) || !(k <= 8.5e+132))
		tmp = Float64(-27.0 * Float64(j * k));
	else
		tmp = Float64(b * c);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((k <= -2.4e-79) || ~((k <= 8.5e+132)))
		tmp = -27.0 * (j * k);
	else
		tmp = b * c;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, and k should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_, j_, k_] := If[Or[LessEqual[k, -2.4e-79], N[Not[LessEqual[k, 8.5e+132]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(-27.0 * N[(j * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if k < -2.40000000000000006e-79 or 8.49999999999999969e132 < k

   1. Initial program 82.3%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t - \left(a \cdot 4\right) \cdot t\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot 4\right) \cdot i\right) - \left(j \cdot 27\right) \cdot k \]

   3. Simplified 87.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 18 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right), a \cdot -4\right), \mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, x \cdot \left(i \cdot -4\right)\right)\right) + j \cdot \left(k \cdot -27\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in j around inf 46.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-27 \cdot \left(j \cdot k\right)} \]

   if -2.40000000000000006e-79 < k < 8.49999999999999969e132

   1. Initial program 84.5%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t - \left(a \cdot 4\right) \cdot t\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot 4\right) \cdot i\right) - \left(j \cdot 27\right) \cdot k \]

   3. Simplified 87.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) - a \cdot 4\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 85.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(t \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot z} - a \cdot 4\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      2. distribute-rgt-out-- 84.5%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t - \left(a \cdot 4\right) \cdot t\right)} + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      3. sub-neg 84.5%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t + \left(-\left(a \cdot 4\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      4. associate-*l* 83.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)} + \left(-\left(a \cdot 4\right) \cdot t\right)\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      5. *-commutative 83.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(x \cdot 18\right)\right)} \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right) + \left(-\left(a \cdot 4\right) \cdot t\right)\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      6. *-commutative 83.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(y \cdot \left(x \cdot 18\right)\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right) + \left(-\color{blue}{t \cdot \left(a \cdot 4\right)}\right)\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 83.3%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(y \cdot \left(x \cdot 18\right)\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right) + \left(-t \cdot \left(a \cdot 4\right)\right)\right)} + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 83.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(y \cdot \left(x \cdot 18\right)\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right) - t \cdot \left(a \cdot 4\right)\right)} + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      2. associate-*l* 88.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right)} - t \cdot \left(a \cdot 4\right)\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      3. associate-*r* 88.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(y \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) - \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot a\right) \cdot 4}\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      4. *-commutative 88.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(y \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) - \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot t\right)} \cdot 4\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      5. *-commutative 88.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(y \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) - \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(a \cdot t\right)}\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      6. fma-neg 88.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right), -4 \cdot \left(a \cdot t\right)\right)} + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      7. *-commutative 88.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z\right)}, -4 \cdot \left(a \cdot t\right)\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      8. distribute-lft-neg-in 88.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right), \color{blue}{\left(-4\right) \cdot \left(a \cdot t\right)}\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      9. metadata-eval 88.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right), \color{blue}{-4} \cdot \left(a \cdot t\right)\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      10. *-commutative 88.0%

          \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right), -4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot a\right)}\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

   8. Simplified 88.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right), -4 \cdot \left(t \cdot a\right)\right)} + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

   9. Taylor expanded in b around inf 38.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot c} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 42.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;k \leq -2.4 \cdot 10^{-79} \lor \neg \left(k \leq 8.5 \cdot 10^{+132}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;-27 \cdot \left(j \cdot k\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot c\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 16: 32.6% accurate, 2.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;k \leq -3.6 \cdot 10^{-90}:\\ \;\;\;\;j \cdot \left(k \cdot -27\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;k \leq 1.7 \cdot 10^{+133}:\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot c\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;k \cdot \left(j \cdot -27\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, and k should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i j k)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= k -3.6e-90)
   (* j (* k -27.0))
   (if (<= k 1.7e+133) (* b c) (* k (* j -27.0)))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i && i < j && j < k);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i, double j, double k) {
	double tmp;
	if (k <= -3.6e-90) {
		tmp = j * (k * -27.0);
	} else if (k <= 1.7e+133) {
		tmp = b * c;
	} else {
		tmp = k * (j * -27.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, and k should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8), intent (in) :: j
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (k <= (-3.6d-90)) then
        tmp = j * (k * (-27.0d0))
    else if (k <= 1.7d+133) then
        tmp = b * c
    else
        tmp = k * (j * (-27.0d0))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i && i < j && j < k;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i, double j, double k) {
	double tmp;
	if (k <= -3.6e-90) {
		tmp = j * (k * -27.0);
	} else if (k <= 1.7e+133) {
		tmp = b * c;
	} else {
		tmp = k * (j * -27.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k):
	tmp = 0
	if k <= -3.6e-90:
		tmp = j * (k * -27.0)
	elif k <= 1.7e+133:
		tmp = b * c
	else:
		tmp = k * (j * -27.0)
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (k <= -3.6e-90)
		tmp = Float64(j * Float64(k * -27.0));
	elseif (k <= 1.7e+133)
		tmp = Float64(b * c);
	else
		tmp = Float64(k * Float64(j * -27.0));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (k <= -3.6e-90)
		tmp = j * (k * -27.0);
	elseif (k <= 1.7e+133)
		tmp = b * c;
	else
		tmp = k * (j * -27.0);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, and k should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_, j_, k_] := If[LessEqual[k, -3.6e-90], N[(j * N[(k * -27.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[k, 1.7e+133], N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision], N[(k * N[(j * -27.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if k < -3.59999999999999981e-90

   1. Initial program 79.0%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t - \left(a \cdot 4\right) \cdot t\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot 4\right) \cdot i\right) - \left(j \cdot 27\right) \cdot k \]

   3. Simplified 88.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 18 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right), a \cdot -4\right), \mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, x \cdot \left(i \cdot -4\right)\right)\right) + j \cdot \left(k \cdot -27\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in j around inf 44.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-27 \cdot \left(j \cdot k\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 44.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(j \cdot k\right) \cdot -27} \]

      2. associate-*r* 44.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{j \cdot \left(k \cdot -27\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative 44.7%

         \[\leadsto j \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-27 \cdot k\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 44.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{j \cdot \left(-27 \cdot k\right)} \]

   if -3.59999999999999981e-90 < k < 1.69999999999999994e133

   1. Initial program 84.4%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t - \left(a \cdot 4\right) \cdot t\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot 4\right) \cdot i\right) - \left(j \cdot 27\right) \cdot k \]

   3. Simplified 87.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) - a \cdot 4\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 85.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(t \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot z} - a \cdot 4\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      2. distribute-rgt-out-- 84.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t - \left(a \cdot 4\right) \cdot t\right)} + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      3. sub-neg 84.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t + \left(-\left(a \cdot 4\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      4. associate-*l* 83.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)} + \left(-\left(a \cdot 4\right) \cdot t\right)\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      5. *-commutative 83.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(x \cdot 18\right)\right)} \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right) + \left(-\left(a \cdot 4\right) \cdot t\right)\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      6. *-commutative 83.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(y \cdot \left(x \cdot 18\right)\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right) + \left(-\color{blue}{t \cdot \left(a \cdot 4\right)}\right)\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 83.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(y \cdot \left(x \cdot 18\right)\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right) + \left(-t \cdot \left(a \cdot 4\right)\right)\right)} + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 83.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(y \cdot \left(x \cdot 18\right)\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right) - t \cdot \left(a \cdot 4\right)\right)} + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      2. associate-*l* 87.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right)} - t \cdot \left(a \cdot 4\right)\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      3. associate-*r* 87.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(y \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) - \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot a\right) \cdot 4}\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      4. *-commutative 87.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(y \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) - \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot t\right)} \cdot 4\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      5. *-commutative 87.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(y \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) - \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(a \cdot t\right)}\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      6. fma-neg 87.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right), -4 \cdot \left(a \cdot t\right)\right)} + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      7. *-commutative 87.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z\right)}, -4 \cdot \left(a \cdot t\right)\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      8. distribute-lft-neg-in 87.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right), \color{blue}{\left(-4\right) \cdot \left(a \cdot t\right)}\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      9. metadata-eval 87.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right), \color{blue}{-4} \cdot \left(a \cdot t\right)\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      10. *-commutative 87.9%

          \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right), -4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot a\right)}\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

   8. Simplified 87.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right), -4 \cdot \left(t \cdot a\right)\right)} + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

   9. Taylor expanded in b around inf 38.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot c} \]

   if 1.69999999999999994e133 < k

   1. Initial program 88.2%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t - \left(a \cdot 4\right) \cdot t\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot 4\right) \cdot i\right) - \left(j \cdot 27\right) \cdot k \]

   3. Simplified 86.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) - a \cdot 4\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 88.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(t \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot z} - a \cdot 4\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      2. distribute-rgt-out-- 88.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t - \left(a \cdot 4\right) \cdot t\right)} + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      3. sub-neg 88.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t + \left(-\left(a \cdot 4\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      4. associate-*l* 85.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)} + \left(-\left(a \cdot 4\right) \cdot t\right)\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      5. *-commutative 85.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(x \cdot 18\right)\right)} \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right) + \left(-\left(a \cdot 4\right) \cdot t\right)\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      6. *-commutative 85.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(y \cdot \left(x \cdot 18\right)\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right) + \left(-\color{blue}{t \cdot \left(a \cdot 4\right)}\right)\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 85.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(y \cdot \left(x \cdot 18\right)\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right) + \left(-t \cdot \left(a \cdot 4\right)\right)\right)} + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 85.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(y \cdot \left(x \cdot 18\right)\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right) - t \cdot \left(a \cdot 4\right)\right)} + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      2. associate-*l* 85.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right)} - t \cdot \left(a \cdot 4\right)\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      3. associate-*r* 85.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(y \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) - \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot a\right) \cdot 4}\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      4. *-commutative 85.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(y \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) - \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot t\right)} \cdot 4\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      5. *-commutative 85.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(y \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) - \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(a \cdot t\right)}\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      6. fma-neg 85.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right), -4 \cdot \left(a \cdot t\right)\right)} + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      7. *-commutative 85.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z\right)}, -4 \cdot \left(a \cdot t\right)\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      8. distribute-lft-neg-in 85.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right), \color{blue}{\left(-4\right) \cdot \left(a \cdot t\right)}\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      9. metadata-eval 85.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right), \color{blue}{-4} \cdot \left(a \cdot t\right)\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      10. *-commutative 85.9%

          \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right), -4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot a\right)}\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

   8. Simplified 85.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right), -4 \cdot \left(t \cdot a\right)\right)} + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-undefine 85.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)\right) + -4 \cdot \left(t \cdot a\right)\right)} + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

   10. Applied egg-rr 85.9%

       \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)\right) + -4 \cdot \left(t \cdot a\right)\right)} + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

   11. Taylor expanded in j around inf 49.2%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-27 \cdot \left(j \cdot k\right)} \]
   12. Step-by-step derivation

       1. *-commutative 49.2%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(j \cdot k\right) \cdot -27} \]

       2. *-commutative 49.2%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(k \cdot j\right)} \cdot -27 \]

       3. associate-*r* 49.2%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(j \cdot -27\right)} \]

   13. Simplified 49.2%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(j \cdot -27\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 42.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;k \leq -3.6 \cdot 10^{-90}:\\ \;\;\;\;j \cdot \left(k \cdot -27\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;k \leq 1.7 \cdot 10^{+133}:\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot c\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;k \cdot \left(j \cdot -27\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 17: 32.6% accurate, 2.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;k \leq -5.2 \cdot 10^{-87}:\\ \;\;\;\;j \cdot \left(k \cdot -27\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;k \leq 1.1 \cdot 10^{+133}:\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot c\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-27 \cdot \left(j \cdot k\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, and k should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i j k)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= k -5.2e-87)
   (* j (* k -27.0))
   (if (<= k 1.1e+133) (* b c) (* -27.0 (* j k)))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i && i < j && j < k);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i, double j, double k) {
	double tmp;
	if (k <= -5.2e-87) {
		tmp = j * (k * -27.0);
	} else if (k <= 1.1e+133) {
		tmp = b * c;
	} else {
		tmp = -27.0 * (j * k);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, and k should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8), intent (in) :: j
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (k <= (-5.2d-87)) then
        tmp = j * (k * (-27.0d0))
    else if (k <= 1.1d+133) then
        tmp = b * c
    else
        tmp = (-27.0d0) * (j * k)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i && i < j && j < k;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i, double j, double k) {
	double tmp;
	if (k <= -5.2e-87) {
		tmp = j * (k * -27.0);
	} else if (k <= 1.1e+133) {
		tmp = b * c;
	} else {
		tmp = -27.0 * (j * k);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k):
	tmp = 0
	if k <= -5.2e-87:
		tmp = j * (k * -27.0)
	elif k <= 1.1e+133:
		tmp = b * c
	else:
		tmp = -27.0 * (j * k)
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (k <= -5.2e-87)
		tmp = Float64(j * Float64(k * -27.0));
	elseif (k <= 1.1e+133)
		tmp = Float64(b * c);
	else
		tmp = Float64(-27.0 * Float64(j * k));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (k <= -5.2e-87)
		tmp = j * (k * -27.0);
	elseif (k <= 1.1e+133)
		tmp = b * c;
	else
		tmp = -27.0 * (j * k);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, and k should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_, j_, k_] := If[LessEqual[k, -5.2e-87], N[(j * N[(k * -27.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[k, 1.1e+133], N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision], N[(-27.0 * N[(j * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if k < -5.20000000000000005e-87

   1. Initial program 78.8%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t - \left(a \cdot 4\right) \cdot t\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot 4\right) \cdot i\right) - \left(j \cdot 27\right) \cdot k \]

   3. Simplified 87.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 18 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right), a \cdot -4\right), \mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, x \cdot \left(i \cdot -4\right)\right)\right) + j \cdot \left(k \cdot -27\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in j around inf 45.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-27 \cdot \left(j \cdot k\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 45.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(j \cdot k\right) \cdot -27} \]

      2. associate-*r* 45.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{j \cdot \left(k \cdot -27\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative 45.2%

         \[\leadsto j \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-27 \cdot k\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 45.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{j \cdot \left(-27 \cdot k\right)} \]

   if -5.20000000000000005e-87 < k < 1.1e133

   1. Initial program 84.5%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t - \left(a \cdot 4\right) \cdot t\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot 4\right) \cdot i\right) - \left(j \cdot 27\right) \cdot k \]

   3. Simplified 87.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) - a \cdot 4\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 85.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(t \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot z} - a \cdot 4\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      2. distribute-rgt-out-- 84.5%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t - \left(a \cdot 4\right) \cdot t\right)} + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      3. sub-neg 84.5%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t + \left(-\left(a \cdot 4\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      4. associate-*l* 83.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)} + \left(-\left(a \cdot 4\right) \cdot t\right)\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      5. *-commutative 83.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(x \cdot 18\right)\right)} \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right) + \left(-\left(a \cdot 4\right) \cdot t\right)\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      6. *-commutative 83.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(y \cdot \left(x \cdot 18\right)\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right) + \left(-\color{blue}{t \cdot \left(a \cdot 4\right)}\right)\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 83.3%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(y \cdot \left(x \cdot 18\right)\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right) + \left(-t \cdot \left(a \cdot 4\right)\right)\right)} + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 83.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(y \cdot \left(x \cdot 18\right)\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right) - t \cdot \left(a \cdot 4\right)\right)} + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      2. associate-*l* 88.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right)} - t \cdot \left(a \cdot 4\right)\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      3. associate-*r* 88.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(y \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) - \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot a\right) \cdot 4}\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      4. *-commutative 88.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(y \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) - \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot t\right)} \cdot 4\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      5. *-commutative 88.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(y \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) - \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(a \cdot t\right)}\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      6. fma-neg 88.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right), -4 \cdot \left(a \cdot t\right)\right)} + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      7. *-commutative 88.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z\right)}, -4 \cdot \left(a \cdot t\right)\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      8. distribute-lft-neg-in 88.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right), \color{blue}{\left(-4\right) \cdot \left(a \cdot t\right)}\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      9. metadata-eval 88.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right), \color{blue}{-4} \cdot \left(a \cdot t\right)\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

      10. *-commutative 88.0%

          \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right), -4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot a\right)}\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

   8. Simplified 88.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right), -4 \cdot \left(t \cdot a\right)\right)} + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

   9. Taylor expanded in b around inf 38.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot c} \]

   if 1.1e133 < k

   1. Initial program 88.2%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t - \left(a \cdot 4\right) \cdot t\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot 4\right) \cdot i\right) - \left(j \cdot 27\right) \cdot k \]

   3. Simplified 86.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 18 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right), a \cdot -4\right), \mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, x \cdot \left(i \cdot -4\right)\right)\right) + j \cdot \left(k \cdot -27\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in j around inf 49.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-27 \cdot \left(j \cdot k\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 42.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;k \leq -5.2 \cdot 10^{-87}:\\ \;\;\;\;j \cdot \left(k \cdot -27\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;k \leq 1.1 \cdot 10^{+133}:\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot c\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-27 \cdot \left(j \cdot k\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 18: 24.6% accurate, 10.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k])\\ \\ b \cdot c \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, and k should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i j k) :precision binary64 (* b c))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i && i < j && j < k);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i, double j, double k) {
	return b * c;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, and k should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8), intent (in) :: j
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    code = b * c
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i && i < j && j < k;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i, double j, double k) {
	return b * c;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k):
	return b * c

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k)
	return Float64(b * c)
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k])){:}
function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k)
	tmp = b * c;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, and k should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_, j_, k_] := N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 83.5%

   \[\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t - \left(a \cdot 4\right) \cdot t\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot 4\right) \cdot i\right) - \left(j \cdot 27\right) \cdot k \]

3. Simplified 87.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) - a \cdot 4\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-*r* 84.7%

      \[\leadsto \left(t \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot z} - a \cdot 4\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

   2. distribute-rgt-out-- 83.5%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t - \left(a \cdot 4\right) \cdot t\right)} + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

   3. sub-neg 83.5%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t + \left(-\left(a \cdot 4\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

   4. associate-*l* 81.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)} + \left(-\left(a \cdot 4\right) \cdot t\right)\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

   5. *-commutative 81.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(x \cdot 18\right)\right)} \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right) + \left(-\left(a \cdot 4\right) \cdot t\right)\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

   6. *-commutative 81.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(y \cdot \left(x \cdot 18\right)\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right) + \left(-\color{blue}{t \cdot \left(a \cdot 4\right)}\right)\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

6. Applied egg-rr 81.9%

   \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(y \cdot \left(x \cdot 18\right)\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right) + \left(-t \cdot \left(a \cdot 4\right)\right)\right)} + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

   1. sub-neg 81.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(y \cdot \left(x \cdot 18\right)\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right) - t \cdot \left(a \cdot 4\right)\right)} + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

   2. associate-*l* 86.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right)} - t \cdot \left(a \cdot 4\right)\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

   3. associate-*r* 86.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(y \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) - \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot a\right) \cdot 4}\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

   4. *-commutative 86.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(y \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) - \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot t\right)} \cdot 4\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

   5. *-commutative 86.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(y \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) - \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(a \cdot t\right)}\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

   6. fma-neg 86.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right), -4 \cdot \left(a \cdot t\right)\right)} + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

   7. *-commutative 86.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z\right)}, -4 \cdot \left(a \cdot t\right)\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

   8. distribute-lft-neg-in 86.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right), \color{blue}{\left(-4\right) \cdot \left(a \cdot t\right)}\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

   9. metadata-eval 86.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right), \color{blue}{-4} \cdot \left(a \cdot t\right)\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

   10. *-commutative 86.0%

       \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right), -4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot a\right)}\right) + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

8. Simplified 86.0%

   \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \left(x \cdot 18\right) \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right), -4 \cdot \left(t \cdot a\right)\right)} + b \cdot c\right) - \left(x \cdot \left(4 \cdot i\right) + j \cdot \left(27 \cdot k\right)\right) \]

9. Taylor expanded in b around inf 26.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot c} \]
10. Add Preprocessing

Developer Target 1: 88.9% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \left(a \cdot t + i \cdot x\right) \cdot 4\\ t_2 := \left(\left(18 \cdot t\right) \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right) - t\_1\right) - \left(\left(k \cdot j\right) \cdot 27 - c \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t < -1.6210815397541398 \cdot 10^{-69}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t < 165.68027943805222:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(\left(18 \cdot y\right) \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) - t\_1\right) + \left(c \cdot b - 27 \cdot \left(k \cdot j\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i j k)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* (+ (* a t) (* i x)) 4.0))
        (t_2
         (-
          (- (* (* 18.0 t) (* (* x y) z)) t_1)
          (- (* (* k j) 27.0) (* c b)))))
   (if (< t -1.6210815397541398e-69)
     t_2
     (if (< t 165.68027943805222)
       (+ (- (* (* 18.0 y) (* x (* z t))) t_1) (- (* c b) (* 27.0 (* k j))))
       t_2))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i, double j, double k) {
	double t_1 = ((a * t) + (i * x)) * 4.0;
	double t_2 = (((18.0 * t) * ((x * y) * z)) - t_1) - (((k * j) * 27.0) - (c * b));
	double tmp;
	if (t < -1.6210815397541398e-69) {
		tmp = t_2;
	} else if (t < 165.68027943805222) {
		tmp = (((18.0 * y) * (x * (z * t))) - t_1) + ((c * b) - (27.0 * (k * j)));
	} else {
		tmp = t_2;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8), intent (in) :: j
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: t_2
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = ((a * t) + (i * x)) * 4.0d0
    t_2 = (((18.0d0 * t) * ((x * y) * z)) - t_1) - (((k * j) * 27.0d0) - (c * b))
    if (t < (-1.6210815397541398d-69)) then
        tmp = t_2
    else if (t < 165.68027943805222d0) then
        tmp = (((18.0d0 * y) * (x * (z * t))) - t_1) + ((c * b) - (27.0d0 * (k * j)))
    else
        tmp = t_2
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i, double j, double k) {
	double t_1 = ((a * t) + (i * x)) * 4.0;
	double t_2 = (((18.0 * t) * ((x * y) * z)) - t_1) - (((k * j) * 27.0) - (c * b));
	double tmp;
	if (t < -1.6210815397541398e-69) {
		tmp = t_2;
	} else if (t < 165.68027943805222) {
		tmp = (((18.0 * y) * (x * (z * t))) - t_1) + ((c * b) - (27.0 * (k * j)));
	} else {
		tmp = t_2;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k):
	t_1 = ((a * t) + (i * x)) * 4.0
	t_2 = (((18.0 * t) * ((x * y) * z)) - t_1) - (((k * j) * 27.0) - (c * b))
	tmp = 0
	if t < -1.6210815397541398e-69:
		tmp = t_2
	elif t < 165.68027943805222:
		tmp = (((18.0 * y) * (x * (z * t))) - t_1) + ((c * b) - (27.0 * (k * j)))
	else:
		tmp = t_2
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(Float64(a * t) + Float64(i * x)) * 4.0)
	t_2 = Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(18.0 * t) * Float64(Float64(x * y) * z)) - t_1) - Float64(Float64(Float64(k * j) * 27.0) - Float64(c * b)))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t < -1.6210815397541398e-69)
		tmp = t_2;
	elseif (t < 165.68027943805222)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(18.0 * y) * Float64(x * Float64(z * t))) - t_1) + Float64(Float64(c * b) - Float64(27.0 * Float64(k * j))));
	else
		tmp = t_2;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i, j, k)
	t_1 = ((a * t) + (i * x)) * 4.0;
	t_2 = (((18.0 * t) * ((x * y) * z)) - t_1) - (((k * j) * 27.0) - (c * b));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t < -1.6210815397541398e-69)
		tmp = t_2;
	elseif (t < 165.68027943805222)
		tmp = (((18.0 * y) * (x * (z * t))) - t_1) + ((c * b) - (27.0 * (k * j)));
	else
		tmp = t_2;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_, j_, k_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(N[(a * t), $MachinePrecision] + N[(i * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * 4.0), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[(N[(N[(N[(18.0 * t), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t$95$1), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(N[(k * j), $MachinePrecision] * 27.0), $MachinePrecision] - N[(c * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[Less[t, -1.6210815397541398e-69], t$95$2, If[Less[t, 165.68027943805222], N[(N[(N[(N[(18.0 * y), $MachinePrecision] * N[(x * N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t$95$1), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(c * b), $MachinePrecision] - N[(27.0 * N[(k * j), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$2]]]]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024112 
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i j k)
  :name "Diagrams.Solve.Polynomial:cubForm  from diagrams-solve-0.1, E"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (! :herbie-platform default (if (< t -8105407698770699/5000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000) (- (- (* (* 18 t) (* (* x y) z)) (* (+ (* a t) (* i x)) 4)) (- (* (* k j) 27) (* c b))) (if (< t 8284013971902611/50000000000000) (+ (- (* (* 18 y) (* x (* z t))) (* (+ (* a t) (* i x)) 4)) (- (* c b) (* 27 (* k j)))) (- (- (* (* 18 t) (* (* x y) z)) (* (+ (* a t) (* i x)) 4)) (- (* (* k j) 27) (* c b))))))

  (- (- (+ (- (* (* (* (* x 18.0) y) z) t) (* (* a 4.0) t)) (* b c)) (* (* x 4.0) i)) (* (* j 27.0) k)))