Diagrams.ThreeD.Transform:aboutY from diagrams-lib-1.3.0.3

Percentage Accurate: 99.8% → 99.8%

Time: 11.6s

Alternatives: 8

Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot \cos y + z \cdot \sin y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* x (cos y)) (* z (sin y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * cos(y)) + (z * sin(y));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * cos(y)) + (z * sin(y))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * Math.cos(y)) + (z * Math.sin(y));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * math.cos(y)) + (z * math.sin(y))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * cos(y)) + Float64(z * sin(y)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * cos(y)) + (z * sin(y));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * N[Cos[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * N[Sin[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot \cos y + z \cdot \sin y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* x (cos y)) (* z (sin y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * cos(y)) + (z * sin(y));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * cos(y)) + (z * sin(y))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * Math.cos(y)) + (z * Math.sin(y));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * math.cos(y)) + (z * math.sin(y))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * cos(y)) + Float64(z * sin(y)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * cos(y)) + (z * sin(y));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * N[Cos[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * N[Sin[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.8% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \cos y, z \cdot \sin y\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (fma x (cos y) (* z (sin y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return fma(x, cos(y), (z * sin(y)));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return fma(x, cos(y), Float64(z * sin(y)))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x * N[Cos[y], $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * N[Sin[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[x \cdot \cos y + z \cdot \sin y \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. fma-define 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \cos y, z \cdot \sin y\right)} \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \cos y, z \cdot \sin y\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ z \cdot \sin y + x \cdot \cos y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* z (sin y)) (* x (cos y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (z * sin(y)) + (x * cos(y));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (z * sin(y)) + (x * cos(y))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (z * Math.sin(y)) + (x * Math.cos(y));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (z * math.sin(y)) + (x * math.cos(y))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(z * sin(y)) + Float64(x * cos(y)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (z * sin(y)) + (x * cos(y));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(z * N[Sin[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * N[Cos[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[x \cdot \cos y + z \cdot \sin y \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto z \cdot \sin y + x \cdot \cos y \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 85.8% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -2.35 \cdot 10^{+117} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1.05 \cdot 10^{+95}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \cos y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \sin y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -2.35e+117) (not (<= x 1.05e+95)))
   (* x (cos y))
   (+ x (* z (sin y)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -2.35e+117) || !(x <= 1.05e+95)) {
		tmp = x * cos(y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * sin(y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-2.35d+117)) .or. (.not. (x <= 1.05d+95))) then
        tmp = x * cos(y)
    else
        tmp = x + (z * sin(y))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -2.35e+117) || !(x <= 1.05e+95)) {
		tmp = x * Math.cos(y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * Math.sin(y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -2.35e+117) or not (x <= 1.05e+95):
		tmp = x * math.cos(y)
	else:
		tmp = x + (z * math.sin(y))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -2.35e+117) || !(x <= 1.05e+95))
		tmp = Float64(x * cos(y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * sin(y)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -2.35e+117) || ~((x <= 1.05e+95)))
		tmp = x * cos(y);
	else
		tmp = x + (z * sin(y));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -2.35e+117], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 1.05e+95]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[Cos[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(z * N[Sin[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -2.35000000000000003e117 or 1.05e95 < x

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot \cos y + z \cdot \sin y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 92.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \cos y} \]

   if -2.35000000000000003e117 < x < 1.05e95

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[x \cdot \cos y + z \cdot \sin y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 89.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} + z \cdot \sin y \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 90.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -2.35 \cdot 10^{+117} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1.05 \cdot 10^{+95}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \cos y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \sin y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 73.5% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.4 \cdot 10^{+87} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 5.8 \cdot 10^{-17}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \sin y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \cos y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -2.4e+87) (not (<= z 5.8e-17))) (* z (sin y)) (* x (cos y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -2.4e+87) || !(z <= 5.8e-17)) {
		tmp = z * sin(y);
	} else {
		tmp = x * cos(y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-2.4d+87)) .or. (.not. (z <= 5.8d-17))) then
        tmp = z * sin(y)
    else
        tmp = x * cos(y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -2.4e+87) || !(z <= 5.8e-17)) {
		tmp = z * Math.sin(y);
	} else {
		tmp = x * Math.cos(y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -2.4e+87) or not (z <= 5.8e-17):
		tmp = z * math.sin(y)
	else:
		tmp = x * math.cos(y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -2.4e+87) || !(z <= 5.8e-17))
		tmp = Float64(z * sin(y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * cos(y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -2.4e+87) || ~((z <= 5.8e-17)))
		tmp = z * sin(y);
	else
		tmp = x * cos(y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -2.4e+87], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 5.8e-17]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(z * N[Sin[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * N[Cos[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -2.39999999999999981e87 or 5.8000000000000006e-17 < z

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[x \cdot \cos y + z \cdot \sin y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 80.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \sin y} \]

   if -2.39999999999999981e87 < z < 5.8000000000000006e-17

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot \cos y + z \cdot \sin y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 83.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \cos y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 82.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.4 \cdot 10^{+87} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 5.8 \cdot 10^{-17}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \sin y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \cos y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 74.3% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -3400 \lor \neg \left(y \leq 0.019\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \cos y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(z + y \cdot \left(x \cdot -0.5 + -0.16666666666666666 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -3400.0) (not (<= y 0.019)))
   (* x (cos y))
   (+ x (* y (+ z (* y (+ (* x -0.5) (* -0.16666666666666666 (* y z)))))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -3400.0) || !(y <= 0.019)) {
		tmp = x * cos(y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * (z + (y * ((x * -0.5) + (-0.16666666666666666 * (y * z))))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-3400.0d0)) .or. (.not. (y <= 0.019d0))) then
        tmp = x * cos(y)
    else
        tmp = x + (y * (z + (y * ((x * (-0.5d0)) + ((-0.16666666666666666d0) * (y * z))))))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -3400.0) || !(y <= 0.019)) {
		tmp = x * Math.cos(y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * (z + (y * ((x * -0.5) + (-0.16666666666666666 * (y * z))))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -3400.0) or not (y <= 0.019):
		tmp = x * math.cos(y)
	else:
		tmp = x + (y * (z + (y * ((x * -0.5) + (-0.16666666666666666 * (y * z))))))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -3400.0) || !(y <= 0.019))
		tmp = Float64(x * cos(y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(z + Float64(y * Float64(Float64(x * -0.5) + Float64(-0.16666666666666666 * Float64(y * z)))))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -3400.0) || ~((y <= 0.019)))
		tmp = x * cos(y);
	else
		tmp = x + (y * (z + (y * ((x * -0.5) + (-0.16666666666666666 * (y * z))))));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -3400.0], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 0.019]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[Cos[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(y * N[(z + N[(y * N[(N[(x * -0.5), $MachinePrecision] + N[(-0.16666666666666666 * N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -3400 or 0.0189999999999999995 < y

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[x \cdot \cos y + z \cdot \sin y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 46.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \cos y} \]

   if -3400 < y < 0.0189999999999999995

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot \cos y + z \cdot \sin y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 98.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \left(z + y \cdot \left(-0.5 \cdot x + -0.16666666666666666 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 71.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -3400 \lor \neg \left(y \leq 0.019\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \cos y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(z + y \cdot \left(x \cdot -0.5 + -0.16666666666666666 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 39.2% accurate, 15.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.5 \cdot 10^{+97} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 5.1 \cdot 10^{-20}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -2.5e+97) (not (<= z 5.1e-20))) (* y z) x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -2.5e+97) || !(z <= 5.1e-20)) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-2.5d+97)) .or. (.not. (z <= 5.1d-20))) then
        tmp = y * z
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -2.5e+97) || !(z <= 5.1e-20)) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -2.5e+97) or not (z <= 5.1e-20):
		tmp = y * z
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -2.5e+97) || !(z <= 5.1e-20))
		tmp = Float64(y * z);
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -2.5e+97) || ~((z <= 5.1e-20)))
		tmp = y * z;
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -2.5e+97], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 5.1e-20]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision], x]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -2.49999999999999999e97 or 5.10000000000000019e-20 < z

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[x \cdot \cos y + z \cdot \sin y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 80.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \sin y} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around 0 32.9%

      \[\leadsto z \cdot \color{blue}{y} \]

   if -2.49999999999999999e97 < z < 5.10000000000000019e-20

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot \cos y + z \cdot \sin y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 55.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 55.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z + x} \]

   5. Simplified 55.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z + x} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around 0 52.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 43.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.5 \cdot 10^{+97} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 5.1 \cdot 10^{-20}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 51.8% accurate, 41.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + y \cdot z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (* y z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (y * z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (y * z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(y * z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (y * z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[x \cdot \cos y + z \cdot \sin y \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 50.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot z} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 50.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z + x} \]

5. Simplified 50.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z + x} \]

6. Final simplification 50.0%

   \[\leadsto x + y \cdot z \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 37.8% accurate, 207.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[x \cdot \cos y + z \cdot \sin y \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 50.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot z} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 50.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z + x} \]

5. Simplified 50.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z + x} \]

6. Taylor expanded in y around 0 33.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024112 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Diagrams.ThreeD.Transform:aboutY from diagrams-lib-1.3.0.3"
  :precision binary64
  (+ (* x (cos y)) (* z (sin y))))