a parameter of renormalized beta distribution

Percentage Accurate: 99.8% → 99.8%

Time: 9.3s

Alternatives: 11

Speedup: 1.0×

• 40.9% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

\[\left(0 < m \land 0 < v\right) \land v < 0.25\]

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (* (- (/ (* m (- 1.0 m)) v) 1.0) m))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * m;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = (((m * (1.0d0 - m)) / v) - 1.0d0) * m
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * m;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * m

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(m * Float64(1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * m)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * m;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(m * N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / v), $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * m), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (* (- (/ (* m (- 1.0 m)) v) 1.0) m))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * m;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = (((m * (1.0d0 - m)) / v) - 1.0d0) * m
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * m;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * m

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(m * Float64(1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * m)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * m;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(m * N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / v), $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * m), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ m \cdot \left(\frac{m - m \cdot m}{v} + -1\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (* m (+ (/ (- m (* m m)) v) -1.0)))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return m * (((m - (m * m)) / v) + -1.0);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = m * (((m - (m * m)) / v) + (-1.0d0))
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return m * (((m - (m * m)) / v) + -1.0);
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return m * (((m - (m * m)) / v) + -1.0)

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return Float64(m * Float64(Float64(Float64(m - Float64(m * m)) / v) + -1.0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = m * (((m - (m * m)) / v) + -1.0);
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := N[(m * N[(N[(N[(m - N[(m * m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / v), $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. sub-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\frac{m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-m\right)\right)}}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]

   2. distribute-rgt-in 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\frac{\color{blue}{1 \cdot m + \left(-m\right) \cdot m}}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]

   3. *-un-lft-identity 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\frac{\color{blue}{m} + \left(-m\right) \cdot m}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]

4. Applied egg-rr 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \left(\frac{\color{blue}{m + \left(-m\right) \cdot m}}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]

5. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\frac{m - m \cdot m}{v} + -1\right) \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 39.4% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 2.35 \cdot 10^{-136} \lor \neg \left(m \leq 1\right):\\ \;\;\;\;-m\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{m \cdot m}{v}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= m 2.35e-136) (not (<= m 1.0))) (- m) (/ (* m m) v)))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if ((m <= 2.35e-136) || !(m <= 1.0)) {
		tmp = -m;
	} else {
		tmp = (m * m) / v;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((m <= 2.35d-136) .or. (.not. (m <= 1.0d0))) then
        tmp = -m
    else
        tmp = (m * m) / v
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if ((m <= 2.35e-136) || !(m <= 1.0)) {
		tmp = -m;
	} else {
		tmp = (m * m) / v;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	tmp = 0
	if (m <= 2.35e-136) or not (m <= 1.0):
		tmp = -m
	else:
		tmp = (m * m) / v
	return tmp

Julia

function code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((m <= 2.35e-136) || !(m <= 1.0))
		tmp = Float64(-m);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(m * m) / v);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((m <= 2.35e-136) || ~((m <= 1.0)))
		tmp = -m;
	else
		tmp = (m * m) / v;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := If[Or[LessEqual[m, 2.35e-136], N[Not[LessEqual[m, 1.0]], $MachinePrecision]], (-m), N[(N[(m * m), $MachinePrecision] / v), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 2.35000000000000011e-136 or 1 < m

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-/l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + -1\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 34.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot m} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 34.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-m} \]

   7. Simplified 34.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-m} \]

   if 2.35000000000000011e-136 < m < 1

   1. Initial program 99.6%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 99.6%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-/l* 99.5%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.5%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + -1\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around inf 45.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{m}^{3} \cdot \left(\frac{1}{m \cdot v} - \frac{1}{v}\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in m around 0 75.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{{m}^{2}}{v}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 75.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{m \cdot m}}{v} \]

   8. Applied egg-rr 75.9%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{m \cdot m}}{v} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 43.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 2.35 \cdot 10^{-136} \lor \neg \left(m \leq 1\right):\\ \;\;\;\;-m\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{m \cdot m}{v}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 97.9% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1:\\ \;\;\;\;m \cdot \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;m \cdot \left(-1 - \frac{m \cdot m}{v}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= m 1.0) (* m (+ -1.0 (/ m v))) (* m (- -1.0 (/ (* m m) v)))))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.0) {
		tmp = m * (-1.0 + (m / v));
	} else {
		tmp = m * (-1.0 - ((m * m) / v));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 1.0d0) then
        tmp = m * ((-1.0d0) + (m / v))
    else
        tmp = m * ((-1.0d0) - ((m * m) / v))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.0) {
		tmp = m * (-1.0 + (m / v));
	} else {
		tmp = m * (-1.0 - ((m * m) / v));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 1.0:
		tmp = m * (-1.0 + (m / v))
	else:
		tmp = m * (-1.0 - ((m * m) / v))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 1.0)
		tmp = Float64(m * Float64(-1.0 + Float64(m / v)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(m * Float64(-1.0 - Float64(Float64(m * m) / v)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 1.0)
		tmp = m * (-1.0 + (m / v));
	else
		tmp = m * (-1.0 - ((m * m) / v));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := If[LessEqual[m, 1.0], N[(m * N[(-1.0 + N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(m * N[(-1.0 - N[(N[(m * m), $MachinePrecision] / v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 1

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in m around 0 97.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(\frac{\color{blue}{m}}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]

   if 1 < m

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in m around inf 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\frac{m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(m \cdot \left(\frac{1}{m} - 1\right)\right)}}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]

   4. Taylor expanded in m around inf 98.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(\frac{m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot m\right)}}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 98.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(\frac{m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-m\right)}}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]

   6. Simplified 98.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(\frac{m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-m\right)}}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1:\\ \;\;\;\;m \cdot \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;m \cdot \left(-1 - \frac{m \cdot m}{v}\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 97.9% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1:\\ \;\;\;\;m \cdot \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;m \cdot \left(-1 - m \cdot \frac{m}{v}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= m 1.0) (* m (+ -1.0 (/ m v))) (* m (- -1.0 (* m (/ m v))))))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.0) {
		tmp = m * (-1.0 + (m / v));
	} else {
		tmp = m * (-1.0 - (m * (m / v)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 1.0d0) then
        tmp = m * ((-1.0d0) + (m / v))
    else
        tmp = m * ((-1.0d0) - (m * (m / v)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.0) {
		tmp = m * (-1.0 + (m / v));
	} else {
		tmp = m * (-1.0 - (m * (m / v)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 1.0:
		tmp = m * (-1.0 + (m / v))
	else:
		tmp = m * (-1.0 - (m * (m / v)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 1.0)
		tmp = Float64(m * Float64(-1.0 + Float64(m / v)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(m * Float64(-1.0 - Float64(m * Float64(m / v))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 1.0)
		tmp = m * (-1.0 + (m / v));
	else
		tmp = m * (-1.0 - (m * (m / v)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := If[LessEqual[m, 1.0], N[(m * N[(-1.0 + N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(m * N[(-1.0 - N[(m * N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 1

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in m around 0 97.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(\frac{\color{blue}{m}}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]

   if 1 < m

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-/l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + -1\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around inf 98.1%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \frac{m}{v}\right)} + -1\right) \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 98.1%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{m}{v}\right)} + -1\right) \]

      2. distribute-neg-frac2 98.1%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(m \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{m}{-v}} + -1\right) \]

   7. Simplified 98.1%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(m \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{m}{-v}} + -1\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1:\\ \;\;\;\;m \cdot \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;m \cdot \left(-1 - m \cdot \frac{m}{v}\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 88.3% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1:\\ \;\;\;\;m \cdot \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{-m \cdot m}{v}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= m 1.0) (* m (+ -1.0 (/ m v))) (/ (- (* m m)) v)))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.0) {
		tmp = m * (-1.0 + (m / v));
	} else {
		tmp = -(m * m) / v;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 1.0d0) then
        tmp = m * ((-1.0d0) + (m / v))
    else
        tmp = -(m * m) / v
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.0) {
		tmp = m * (-1.0 + (m / v));
	} else {
		tmp = -(m * m) / v;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 1.0:
		tmp = m * (-1.0 + (m / v))
	else:
		tmp = -(m * m) / v
	return tmp

Julia

function code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 1.0)
		tmp = Float64(m * Float64(-1.0 + Float64(m / v)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(-Float64(m * m)) / v);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 1.0)
		tmp = m * (-1.0 + (m / v));
	else
		tmp = -(m * m) / v;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := If[LessEqual[m, 1.0], N[(m * N[(-1.0 + N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[((-N[(m * m), $MachinePrecision]) / v), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 1

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in m around 0 97.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(\frac{\color{blue}{m}}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]

   if 1 < m

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-/l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + -1\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around inf 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{m}^{3} \cdot \left(\frac{1}{m \cdot v} - \frac{1}{v}\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in m around 0 0.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{{m}^{2}}{v}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. add-sqr-sqrt 0.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\sqrt{{m}^{2}} \cdot \sqrt{{m}^{2}}}}{v} \]

      2. sqrt-unprod 0.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\sqrt{{m}^{2} \cdot {m}^{2}}}}{v} \]

      3. unpow2 0.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\sqrt{{m}^{2} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(m \cdot m\right)}}}{v} \]

      4. unpow2 0.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(m \cdot m\right)} \cdot \left(m \cdot m\right)}}{v} \]

      5. sqr-neg 0.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\sqrt{\left(m \cdot m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(-m\right) \cdot \left(-m\right)\right)}}}{v} \]

      6. swap-sqr 0.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(m \cdot \left(-m\right)\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \left(-m\right)\right)}}}{v} \]

      7. sqrt-unprod 0.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\sqrt{m \cdot \left(-m\right)} \cdot \sqrt{m \cdot \left(-m\right)}}}{v} \]

      8. add-sqr-sqrt 77.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{m \cdot \left(-m\right)}}{v} \]

      9. neg-mul-1 77.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot m\right)}}{v} \]

      10. associate-*r* 77.9%

          \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(m \cdot -1\right) \cdot m}}{v} \]

   8. Applied egg-rr 77.9%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(m \cdot -1\right) \cdot m}}{v} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 88.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1:\\ \;\;\;\;m \cdot \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{-m \cdot m}{v}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 53.2% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1:\\ \;\;\;\;m \cdot \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-m\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (if (<= m 1.0) (* m (+ -1.0 (/ m v))) (- m)))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.0) {
		tmp = m * (-1.0 + (m / v));
	} else {
		tmp = -m;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 1.0d0) then
        tmp = m * ((-1.0d0) + (m / v))
    else
        tmp = -m
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.0) {
		tmp = m * (-1.0 + (m / v));
	} else {
		tmp = -m;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 1.0:
		tmp = m * (-1.0 + (m / v))
	else:
		tmp = -m
	return tmp

Julia

function code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 1.0)
		tmp = Float64(m * Float64(-1.0 + Float64(m / v)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(-m);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 1.0)
		tmp = m * (-1.0 + (m / v));
	else
		tmp = -m;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := If[LessEqual[m, 1.0], N[(m * N[(-1.0 + N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], (-m)]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 1

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in m around 0 97.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(\frac{\color{blue}{m}}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]

   if 1 < m

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-/l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + -1\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 5.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot m} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 5.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-m} \]

   7. Simplified 5.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-m} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 54.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1:\\ \;\;\;\;m \cdot \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-m\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ m \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + -1\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (* m (+ (/ (* m (- 1.0 m)) v) -1.0)))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return m * (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) + -1.0);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = m * (((m * (1.0d0 - m)) / v) + (-1.0d0))
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return m * (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) + -1.0);
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return m * (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) + -1.0)

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return Float64(m * Float64(Float64(Float64(m * Float64(1.0 - m)) / v) + -1.0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = m * (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) + -1.0);
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := N[(m * N[(N[(N[(m * N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / v), $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + -1\right) \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ m \cdot \left(\frac{m}{\frac{v}{1 - m}} + -1\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (* m (+ (/ m (/ v (- 1.0 m))) -1.0)))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return m * ((m / (v / (1.0 - m))) + -1.0);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = m * ((m / (v / (1.0d0 - m))) + (-1.0d0))
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return m * ((m / (v / (1.0 - m))) + -1.0);
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return m * ((m / (v / (1.0 - m))) + -1.0)

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return Float64(m * Float64(Float64(m / Float64(v / Float64(1.0 - m))) + -1.0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = m * ((m / (v / (1.0 - m))) + -1.0);
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := N[(m * N[(N[(m / N[(v / N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

   2. sub-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

   3. associate-/l* 99.8%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

   4. metadata-eval 99.8%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + -1\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 99.8%

   \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{m \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \frac{m}{v} + \frac{1}{v}\right)} + -1\right) \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. neg-mul-1 99.8%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(-\frac{m}{v}\right)} + \frac{1}{v}\right) + -1\right) \]

   2. +-commutative 99.8%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{v} + \left(-\frac{m}{v}\right)\right)} + -1\right) \]

   3. sub-neg 99.8%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{v} - \frac{m}{v}\right)} + -1\right) \]

   4. div-sub 99.8%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(m \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1 - m}{v}} + -1\right) \]

   5. associate-*r/ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v}} + -1\right) \]

   6. associate-*l/ 99.8%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right)} + -1\right) \]

   7. associate-/r/ 99.8%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{\frac{v}{1 - m}}} + -1\right) \]

7. Simplified 99.8%

   \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{\frac{v}{1 - m}}} + -1\right) \]
8. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ m \cdot \left(-1 + m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (* m (+ -1.0 (* m (/ (- 1.0 m) v)))))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return m * (-1.0 + (m * ((1.0 - m) / v)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = m * ((-1.0d0) + (m * ((1.0d0 - m) / v)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return m * (-1.0 + (m * ((1.0 - m) / v)));
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return m * (-1.0 + (m * ((1.0 - m) / v)))

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return Float64(m * Float64(-1.0 + Float64(m * Float64(Float64(1.0 - m) / v))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = m * (-1.0 + (m * ((1.0 - m) / v)));
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := N[(m * N[(-1.0 + N[(m * N[(N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision] / v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

   2. sub-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

   3. associate-/l* 99.8%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

   4. metadata-eval 99.8%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + -1\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Final simplification 99.8%

   \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(-1 + m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}\right) \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 27.5% accurate, 5.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -m \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (- m))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return -m;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = -m
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return -m;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return -m

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return Float64(-m)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = -m;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := (-m)

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

   2. sub-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

   3. associate-/l* 99.8%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

   4. metadata-eval 99.8%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + -1\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 30.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot m} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. neg-mul-1 30.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-m} \]

7. Simplified 30.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-m} \]
8. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 3.1% accurate, 11.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ m \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 m)

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return m;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = m
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return m;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return m

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return m
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = m;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := m

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

   2. sub-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

   3. associate-/l* 99.8%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

   4. metadata-eval 99.8%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + -1\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 30.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot m} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. neg-mul-1 30.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-m} \]

7. Simplified 30.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-m} \]
8. Step-by-step derivation

   1. add-sqr-sqrt 0.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sqrt{-m} \cdot \sqrt{-m}} \]

   2. sqrt-unprod 3.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sqrt{\left(-m\right) \cdot \left(-m\right)}} \]

   3. sqr-neg 3.4%

      \[\leadsto \sqrt{\color{blue}{m \cdot m}} \]

   4. sqrt-unprod 3.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sqrt{m} \cdot \sqrt{m}} \]

   5. add-sqr-sqrt 3.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m} \]

   6. expm1-log1p-u 3.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(m\right)\right)} \]

   7. expm1-undefine 3.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(m\right)} - 1} \]

   8. log1p-undefine 3.0%

      \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{\log \left(1 + m\right)}} - 1 \]

   9. add-exp-log 3.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + m\right)} - 1 \]

9. Applied egg-rr 3.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + m\right) - 1} \]

10. Taylor expanded in m around 0 3.2%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m} \]
11. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024111 
(FPCore (m v)
  :name "a parameter of renormalized beta distribution"
  :precision binary64
  :pre (and (and (< 0.0 m) (< 0.0 v)) (< v 0.25))
  (* (- (/ (* m (- 1.0 m)) v) 1.0) m))