SynthBasics:oscSampleBasedAux from YampaSynth-0.2

Percentage Accurate: 100.0% → 100.0%

Time: 11.6s

Alternatives: 9

Speedup: 1.0×

• 21.2% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (* y (- z x))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (z - x));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (y * (z - x))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (z - x));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (y * (z - x))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(z - x)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (y * (z - x));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(y * N[(z - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (* y (- z x))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (z - x));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (y * (z - x))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (z - x));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (y * (z - x))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(z - x)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (y * (z - x));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(y * N[(z - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z - x, x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (fma y (- z x) x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return fma(y, (z - x), x);
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return fma(y, Float64(z - x), x)
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(y * N[(z - x), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z - x\right) + x} \]

   2. fma-define 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z - x, x\right)} \]

3. Simplified 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z - x, x\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 60.9% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -3 \cdot 10^{+54}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(-x\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq -4.6 \cdot 10^{-58} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 7.6 \cdot 10^{-87}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -3e+54)
   (* y (- x))
   (if (or (<= y -4.6e-58) (not (<= y 7.6e-87))) (* y z) x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -3e+54) {
		tmp = y * -x;
	} else if ((y <= -4.6e-58) || !(y <= 7.6e-87)) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= (-3d+54)) then
        tmp = y * -x
    else if ((y <= (-4.6d-58)) .or. (.not. (y <= 7.6d-87))) then
        tmp = y * z
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -3e+54) {
		tmp = y * -x;
	} else if ((y <= -4.6e-58) || !(y <= 7.6e-87)) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -3e+54:
		tmp = y * -x
	elif (y <= -4.6e-58) or not (y <= 7.6e-87):
		tmp = y * z
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -3e+54)
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(-x));
	elseif ((y <= -4.6e-58) || !(y <= 7.6e-87))
		tmp = Float64(y * z);
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -3e+54)
		tmp = y * -x;
	elseif ((y <= -4.6e-58) || ~((y <= 7.6e-87)))
		tmp = y * z;
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, -3e+54], N[(y * (-x)), $MachinePrecision], If[Or[LessEqual[y, -4.6e-58], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 7.6e-87]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision], x]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if y < -2.9999999999999999e54

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z - x\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 58.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 58.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-x \cdot y} \]

      2. distribute-lft-neg-out 58.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-x\right) \cdot y} \]

      3. *-commutative 58.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-x\right)} \]

   6. Simplified 58.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-x\right)} \]

   if -2.9999999999999999e54 < y < -4.5999999999999998e-58 or 7.6e-87 < y

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 57.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]

   if -4.5999999999999998e-58 < y < 7.6e-87

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 80.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 66.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -3 \cdot 10^{+54}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(-x\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq -4.6 \cdot 10^{-58} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 7.6 \cdot 10^{-87}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 99.0% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1 \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(z - x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -1.0) (not (<= y 1.0))) (* y (- z x)) (+ x (* y z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -1.0) || !(y <= 1.0)) {
		tmp = y * (z - x);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-1.0d0)) .or. (.not. (y <= 1.0d0))) then
        tmp = y * (z - x)
    else
        tmp = x + (y * z)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -1.0) || !(y <= 1.0)) {
		tmp = y * (z - x);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -1.0) or not (y <= 1.0):
		tmp = y * (z - x)
	else:
		tmp = x + (y * z)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -1.0) || !(y <= 1.0))
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(z - x));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * z));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -1.0) || ~((y <= 1.0)))
		tmp = y * (z - x);
	else
		tmp = x + (y * z);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -1.0], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 1.0]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * N[(z - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -1 or 1 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 98.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z - x\right)} \]

   if -1 < y < 1

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 98.2%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1 \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(z - x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot z\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 83.9% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -2.6 \cdot 10^{-58} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 2.55 \cdot 10^{-85}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(z - x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -2.6e-58) (not (<= y 2.55e-85))) (* y (- z x)) x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -2.6e-58) || !(y <= 2.55e-85)) {
		tmp = y * (z - x);
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-2.6d-58)) .or. (.not. (y <= 2.55d-85))) then
        tmp = y * (z - x)
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -2.6e-58) || !(y <= 2.55e-85)) {
		tmp = y * (z - x);
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -2.6e-58) or not (y <= 2.55e-85):
		tmp = y * (z - x)
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -2.6e-58) || !(y <= 2.55e-85))
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(z - x));
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -2.6e-58) || ~((y <= 2.55e-85)))
		tmp = y * (z - x);
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -2.6e-58], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 2.55e-85]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * N[(z - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], x]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -2.60000000000000007e-58 or 2.5500000000000001e-85 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 92.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z - x\right)} \]

   if -2.60000000000000007e-58 < y < 2.5500000000000001e-85

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 80.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 88.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -2.6 \cdot 10^{-58} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 2.55 \cdot 10^{-85}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(z - x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 75.1% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -6.2 \cdot 10^{+23} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1.7 \cdot 10^{+41}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - y\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -6.2e+23) (not (<= z 1.7e+41))) (* y z) (* x (- 1.0 y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -6.2e+23) || !(z <= 1.7e+41)) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-6.2d+23)) .or. (.not. (z <= 1.7d+41))) then
        tmp = y * z
    else
        tmp = x * (1.0d0 - y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -6.2e+23) || !(z <= 1.7e+41)) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -6.2e+23) or not (z <= 1.7e+41):
		tmp = y * z
	else:
		tmp = x * (1.0 - y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -6.2e+23) || !(z <= 1.7e+41))
		tmp = Float64(y * z);
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(1.0 - y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -6.2e+23) || ~((z <= 1.7e+41)))
		tmp = y * z;
	else
		tmp = x * (1.0 - y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -6.2e+23], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 1.7e+41]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * N[(1.0 - y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -6.19999999999999941e23 or 1.69999999999999999e41 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 70.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]

   if -6.19999999999999941e23 < z < 1.69999999999999999e41

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 83.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 83.1%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)}\right) \]

      2. unsub-neg 83.1%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - y\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 83.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 - y\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 77.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -6.2 \cdot 10^{+23} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1.7 \cdot 10^{+41}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - y\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 60.6% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -2.5 \cdot 10^{-58} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 2.55 \cdot 10^{-85}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -2.5e-58) (not (<= y 2.55e-85))) (* y z) x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -2.5e-58) || !(y <= 2.55e-85)) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-2.5d-58)) .or. (.not. (y <= 2.55d-85))) then
        tmp = y * z
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -2.5e-58) || !(y <= 2.55e-85)) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -2.5e-58) or not (y <= 2.55e-85):
		tmp = y * z
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -2.5e-58) || !(y <= 2.55e-85))
		tmp = Float64(y * z);
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -2.5e-58) || ~((y <= 2.55e-85)))
		tmp = y * z;
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -2.5e-58], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 2.55e-85]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision], x]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -2.49999999999999989e-58 or 2.5500000000000001e-85 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 55.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]

   if -2.49999999999999989e-58 < y < 2.5500000000000001e-85

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 80.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 64.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -2.5 \cdot 10^{-58} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 2.55 \cdot 10^{-85}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (* y (- z x))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (z - x));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (y * (z - x))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (z - x));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (y * (z - x))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(z - x)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (y * (z - x));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(y * N[(z - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 37.1% accurate, 7.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 34.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 2.6% accurate, 7.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 0 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 0.0)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 0.0;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = 0.0d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 0.0;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return 0.0

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return 0.0
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := 0.0

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 67.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z - x\right)} \]

4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 29.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)} \]
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. mul-1-neg 29.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-x \cdot y} \]

   2. distribute-lft-neg-out 29.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-x\right) \cdot y} \]

   3. *-commutative 29.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-x\right)} \]

6. Simplified 29.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-x\right)} \]

8. Applied egg-rr 2.6%

   \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{0} \]

9. Taylor expanded in y around 0 2.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0} \]
10. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024111 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "SynthBasics:oscSampleBasedAux from YampaSynth-0.2"
  :precision binary64
  (+ x (* y (- z x))))