Diagrams.Solve.Polynomial:cubForm from diagrams-solve-0.1, A

Percentage Accurate: 95.1% → 98.8%

Time: 11.3s

Alternatives: 12

Speedup: 1.0×

• 28.2% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (- (* x 2.0) (* (* (* y 9.0) z) t)) (* (* a 27.0) b)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x * 2.0) - (((y * 9.0) * z) * t)) + ((a * 27.0) * b);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = ((x * 2.0d0) - (((y * 9.0d0) * z) * t)) + ((a * 27.0d0) * b)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x * 2.0) - (((y * 9.0) * z) * t)) + ((a * 27.0) * b);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return ((x * 2.0) - (((y * 9.0) * z) * t)) + ((a * 27.0) * b)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x * 2.0) - Float64(Float64(Float64(y * 9.0) * z) * t)) + Float64(Float64(a * 27.0) * b))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = ((x * 2.0) - (((y * 9.0) * z) * t)) + ((a * 27.0) * b);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(N[(y * 9.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * 27.0), $MachinePrecision] * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 95.1% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (- (* x 2.0) (* (* (* y 9.0) z) t)) (* (* a 27.0) b)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x * 2.0) - (((y * 9.0) * z) * t)) + ((a * 27.0) * b);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = ((x * 2.0d0) - (((y * 9.0d0) * z) * t)) + ((a * 27.0d0) * b)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x * 2.0) - (((y * 9.0) * z) * t)) + ((a * 27.0) * b);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return ((x * 2.0) - (((y * 9.0) * z) * t)) + ((a * 27.0) * b)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x * 2.0) - Float64(Float64(Float64(y * 9.0) * z) * t)) + Float64(Float64(a * 27.0) * b))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = ((x * 2.0) - (((y * 9.0) * z) * t)) + ((a * 27.0) * b);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(N[(y * 9.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * 27.0), $MachinePrecision] * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 98.8% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq 2 \cdot 10^{-72}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, 27 \cdot b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2, y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(t \cdot -9\right)\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, 27 \cdot b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2, t \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot -9\right)\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z 2e-72)
   (fma a (* 27.0 b) (fma x 2.0 (* y (* z (* t -9.0)))))
   (fma a (* 27.0 b) (fma x 2.0 (* t (* y (* z -9.0)))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= 2e-72) {
		tmp = fma(a, (27.0 * b), fma(x, 2.0, (y * (z * (t * -9.0)))));
	} else {
		tmp = fma(a, (27.0 * b), fma(x, 2.0, (t * (y * (z * -9.0)))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= 2e-72)
		tmp = fma(a, Float64(27.0 * b), fma(x, 2.0, Float64(y * Float64(z * Float64(t * -9.0)))));
	else
		tmp = fma(a, Float64(27.0 * b), fma(x, 2.0, Float64(t * Float64(y * Float64(z * -9.0)))));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[z, 2e-72], N[(a * N[(27.0 * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * 2.0 + N[(y * N[(z * N[(t * -9.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(a * N[(27.0 * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * 2.0 + N[(t * N[(y * N[(z * -9.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < 1.9999999999999999e-72

   1. Initial program 96.7%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 96.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b + \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} \]

      2. associate-+r- 96.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b + x \cdot 2\right) - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t} \]

      3. *-commutative 96.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b + x \cdot 2\right) - \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right)} \]

      4. cancel-sign-sub-inv 96.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b + x \cdot 2\right) + \left(-t\right) \cdot \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right)} \]

      5. associate-*r* 91.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b + x \cdot 2\right) + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-t\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot 9\right)\right) \cdot z} \]

      6. distribute-lft-neg-in 91.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b + x \cdot 2\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-t \cdot \left(y \cdot 9\right)\right)} \cdot z \]

      7. *-commutative 91.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b + x \cdot 2\right) + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot t}\right) \cdot z \]

      8. cancel-sign-sub-inv 91.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b + x \cdot 2\right) - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot t\right) \cdot z} \]

      9. associate-+r- 91.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b + \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot t\right) \cdot z\right)} \]

      10. associate-*l* 91.7%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} + \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot t\right) \cdot z\right) \]

      11. fma-define 92.2%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, 27 \cdot b, x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot t\right) \cdot z\right)} \]

      12. fma-neg 92.2%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, 27 \cdot b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2, -\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot t\right) \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

      13. associate-*l* 96.7%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, 27 \cdot b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2, -\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)}\right)\right) \]

      14. distribute-rgt-neg-in 96.7%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, 27 \cdot b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2, \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(-t \cdot z\right)}\right)\right) \]

      15. *-commutative 96.7%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, 27 \cdot b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2, \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{z \cdot t}\right)\right)\right) \]

      16. associate-*l* 96.7%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, 27 \cdot b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2, \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(9 \cdot \left(-z \cdot t\right)\right)}\right)\right) \]

      17. *-commutative 96.7%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, 27 \cdot b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2, y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(-z \cdot t\right) \cdot 9\right)}\right)\right) \]

      18. distribute-lft-neg-in 96.7%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, 27 \cdot b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2, y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(z \cdot t\right) \cdot 9\right)}\right)\right) \]

      19. associate-*r* 96.7%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, 27 \cdot b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2, y \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t \cdot 9\right)}\right)\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 96.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, 27 \cdot b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2, y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(t \cdot -9\right)\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   if 1.9999999999999999e-72 < z

   1. Initial program 91.4%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 91.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b + \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} \]

      2. associate-+r- 91.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b + x \cdot 2\right) - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t} \]

      3. *-commutative 91.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b + x \cdot 2\right) - \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right)} \]

      4. cancel-sign-sub-inv 91.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b + x \cdot 2\right) + \left(-t\right) \cdot \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right)} \]

      5. associate-*r* 98.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b + x \cdot 2\right) + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-t\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot 9\right)\right) \cdot z} \]

      6. distribute-lft-neg-in 98.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b + x \cdot 2\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-t \cdot \left(y \cdot 9\right)\right)} \cdot z \]

      7. *-commutative 98.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b + x \cdot 2\right) + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot t}\right) \cdot z \]

      8. cancel-sign-sub-inv 98.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b + x \cdot 2\right) - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot t\right) \cdot z} \]

      9. associate-+r- 98.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b + \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot t\right) \cdot z\right)} \]

      10. associate-*l* 98.3%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} + \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot t\right) \cdot z\right) \]

      11. fma-define 99.8%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, 27 \cdot b, x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot t\right) \cdot z\right)} \]

      12. cancel-sign-sub-inv 99.8%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, 27 \cdot b, \color{blue}{x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot t\right) \cdot z}\right) \]

      13. fma-define 99.8%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, 27 \cdot b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2, \left(-\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot t\right) \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

      14. distribute-lft-neg-in 99.8%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, 27 \cdot b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2, \color{blue}{-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot t\right) \cdot z}\right)\right) \]

      15. distribute-rgt-neg-in 99.8%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, 27 \cdot b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2, \color{blue}{\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot t\right) \cdot \left(-z\right)}\right)\right) \]

      16. *-commutative 99.8%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, 27 \cdot b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2, \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot 9\right)\right)} \cdot \left(-z\right)\right)\right) \]

      17. associate-*r* 92.9%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, 27 \cdot b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2, \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(-z\right)\right)}\right)\right) \]

      18. associate-*l* 92.9%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, 27 \cdot b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2, t \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(9 \cdot \left(-z\right)\right)\right)}\right)\right) \]

      19. neg-mul-1 92.9%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, 27 \cdot b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2, t \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(9 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot z\right)}\right)\right)\right)\right) \]

      20. associate-*r* 92.9%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, 27 \cdot b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2, t \cdot \left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(9 \cdot -1\right) \cdot z\right)}\right)\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 92.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, 27 \cdot b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2, t \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(-9 \cdot z\right)\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 95.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq 2 \cdot 10^{-72}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, 27 \cdot b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2, y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(t \cdot -9\right)\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, 27 \cdot b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2, t \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot -9\right)\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 98.1% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq 5 \cdot 10^{-192}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot 2 - 9 \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(y \cdot t\right)\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, 27 \cdot b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2, t \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot -9\right)\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= t 5e-192)
   (+ (- (* x 2.0) (* 9.0 (* z (* y t)))) (* a (* 27.0 b)))
   (fma a (* 27.0 b) (fma x 2.0 (* t (* y (* z -9.0)))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (t <= 5e-192) {
		tmp = ((x * 2.0) - (9.0 * (z * (y * t)))) + (a * (27.0 * b));
	} else {
		tmp = fma(a, (27.0 * b), fma(x, 2.0, (t * (y * (z * -9.0)))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t <= 5e-192)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(x * 2.0) - Float64(9.0 * Float64(z * Float64(y * t)))) + Float64(a * Float64(27.0 * b)));
	else
		tmp = fma(a, Float64(27.0 * b), fma(x, 2.0, Float64(t * Float64(y * Float64(z * -9.0)))));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[t, 5e-192], N[(N[(N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] - N[(9.0 * N[(z * N[(y * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * N[(27.0 * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(a * N[(27.0 * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * 2.0 + N[(t * N[(y * N[(z * -9.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if t < 5.0000000000000001e-192

   1. Initial program 93.5%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 93.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      2. sub-neg 93.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      3. associate-*l* 92.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      4. associate-*l* 93.5%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 93.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 94.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)}\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 95.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - 9 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(t \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right)}\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

      2. *-commutative 95.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - 9 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot \left(t \cdot y\right)\right)}\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

   7. Simplified 95.3%

      \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{9 \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(t \cdot y\right)\right)}\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

   if 5.0000000000000001e-192 < t

   1. Initial program 98.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 98.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b + \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} \]

      2. associate-+r- 98.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b + x \cdot 2\right) - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t} \]

      3. *-commutative 98.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b + x \cdot 2\right) - \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right)} \]

      4. cancel-sign-sub-inv 98.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b + x \cdot 2\right) + \left(-t\right) \cdot \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right)} \]

      5. associate-*r* 90.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b + x \cdot 2\right) + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-t\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot 9\right)\right) \cdot z} \]

      6. distribute-lft-neg-in 90.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b + x \cdot 2\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-t \cdot \left(y \cdot 9\right)\right)} \cdot z \]

      7. *-commutative 90.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b + x \cdot 2\right) + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot t}\right) \cdot z \]

      8. cancel-sign-sub-inv 90.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b + x \cdot 2\right) - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot t\right) \cdot z} \]

      9. associate-+r- 90.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b + \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot t\right) \cdot z\right)} \]

      10. associate-*l* 90.7%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} + \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot t\right) \cdot z\right) \]

      11. fma-define 91.7%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, 27 \cdot b, x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot t\right) \cdot z\right)} \]

      12. cancel-sign-sub-inv 91.7%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, 27 \cdot b, \color{blue}{x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot t\right) \cdot z}\right) \]

      13. fma-define 91.7%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, 27 \cdot b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2, \left(-\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot t\right) \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

      14. distribute-lft-neg-in 91.7%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, 27 \cdot b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2, \color{blue}{-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot t\right) \cdot z}\right)\right) \]

      15. distribute-rgt-neg-in 91.7%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, 27 \cdot b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2, \color{blue}{\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot t\right) \cdot \left(-z\right)}\right)\right) \]

      16. *-commutative 91.7%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, 27 \cdot b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2, \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot 9\right)\right)} \cdot \left(-z\right)\right)\right) \]

      17. associate-*r* 98.9%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, 27 \cdot b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2, \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(-z\right)\right)}\right)\right) \]

      18. associate-*l* 98.9%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, 27 \cdot b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2, t \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(9 \cdot \left(-z\right)\right)\right)}\right)\right) \]

      19. neg-mul-1 98.9%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, 27 \cdot b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2, t \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(9 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot z\right)}\right)\right)\right)\right) \]

      20. associate-*r* 98.9%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, 27 \cdot b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2, t \cdot \left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(9 \cdot -1\right) \cdot z\right)}\right)\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 98.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, 27 \cdot b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2, t \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(-9 \cdot z\right)\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 96.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq 5 \cdot 10^{-192}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot 2 - 9 \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(y \cdot t\right)\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, 27 \cdot b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2, t \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot -9\right)\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 98.1% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := z \cdot \left(y \cdot 9\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_1 \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+162}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot 2 - t \cdot t\_1\right) + b \cdot \left(a \cdot 27\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) + \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* z (* y 9.0))))
   (if (<= t_1 2e+162)
     (+ (- (* x 2.0) (* t t_1)) (* b (* a 27.0)))
     (+ (* a (* 27.0 b)) (- (* x 2.0) (* (* y 9.0) (* z t)))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = z * (y * 9.0);
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= 2e+162) {
		tmp = ((x * 2.0) - (t * t_1)) + (b * (a * 27.0));
	} else {
		tmp = (a * (27.0 * b)) + ((x * 2.0) - ((y * 9.0) * (z * t)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = z * (y * 9.0d0)
    if (t_1 <= 2d+162) then
        tmp = ((x * 2.0d0) - (t * t_1)) + (b * (a * 27.0d0))
    else
        tmp = (a * (27.0d0 * b)) + ((x * 2.0d0) - ((y * 9.0d0) * (z * t)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = z * (y * 9.0);
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= 2e+162) {
		tmp = ((x * 2.0) - (t * t_1)) + (b * (a * 27.0));
	} else {
		tmp = (a * (27.0 * b)) + ((x * 2.0) - ((y * 9.0) * (z * t)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	t_1 = z * (y * 9.0)
	tmp = 0
	if t_1 <= 2e+162:
		tmp = ((x * 2.0) - (t * t_1)) + (b * (a * 27.0))
	else:
		tmp = (a * (27.0 * b)) + ((x * 2.0) - ((y * 9.0) * (z * t)))
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64(z * Float64(y * 9.0))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_1 <= 2e+162)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(x * 2.0) - Float64(t * t_1)) + Float64(b * Float64(a * 27.0)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * Float64(27.0 * b)) + Float64(Float64(x * 2.0) - Float64(Float64(y * 9.0) * Float64(z * t))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = z * (y * 9.0);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t_1 <= 2e+162)
		tmp = ((x * 2.0) - (t * t_1)) + (b * (a * 27.0));
	else
		tmp = (a * (27.0 * b)) + ((x * 2.0) - ((y * 9.0) * (z * t)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(z * N[(y * 9.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$1, 2e+162], N[(N[(N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] - N[(t * t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(b * N[(a * 27.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(a * N[(27.0 * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(y * 9.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 (*.f64 y #s(literal 9 binary64)) z) < 1.9999999999999999e162

   1. Initial program 95.5%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   if 1.9999999999999999e162 < (*.f64 (*.f64 y #s(literal 9 binary64)) z)

   1. Initial program 93.5%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 93.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      2. sub-neg 93.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      3. associate-*l* 96.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      4. associate-*l* 96.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 96.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 95.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \cdot \left(y \cdot 9\right) \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+162}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot 2 - t \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(y \cdot 9\right)\right)\right) + b \cdot \left(a \cdot 27\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) + \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 97.2% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t \leq 4.9 \cdot 10^{+110}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot 2 - 9 \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(y \cdot t\right)\right)\right) + t\_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1 + \left(x \cdot 2 - 9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(z \cdot y\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* a (* 27.0 b))))
   (if (<= t 4.9e+110)
     (+ (- (* x 2.0) (* 9.0 (* z (* y t)))) t_1)
     (+ t_1 (- (* x 2.0) (* 9.0 (* t (* z y))))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = a * (27.0 * b);
	double tmp;
	if (t <= 4.9e+110) {
		tmp = ((x * 2.0) - (9.0 * (z * (y * t)))) + t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = t_1 + ((x * 2.0) - (9.0 * (t * (z * y))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = a * (27.0d0 * b)
    if (t <= 4.9d+110) then
        tmp = ((x * 2.0d0) - (9.0d0 * (z * (y * t)))) + t_1
    else
        tmp = t_1 + ((x * 2.0d0) - (9.0d0 * (t * (z * y))))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = a * (27.0 * b);
	double tmp;
	if (t <= 4.9e+110) {
		tmp = ((x * 2.0) - (9.0 * (z * (y * t)))) + t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = t_1 + ((x * 2.0) - (9.0 * (t * (z * y))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	t_1 = a * (27.0 * b)
	tmp = 0
	if t <= 4.9e+110:
		tmp = ((x * 2.0) - (9.0 * (z * (y * t)))) + t_1
	else:
		tmp = t_1 + ((x * 2.0) - (9.0 * (t * (z * y))))
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64(a * Float64(27.0 * b))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t <= 4.9e+110)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(x * 2.0) - Float64(9.0 * Float64(z * Float64(y * t)))) + t_1);
	else
		tmp = Float64(t_1 + Float64(Float64(x * 2.0) - Float64(9.0 * Float64(t * Float64(z * y)))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = a * (27.0 * b);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t <= 4.9e+110)
		tmp = ((x * 2.0) - (9.0 * (z * (y * t)))) + t_1;
	else
		tmp = t_1 + ((x * 2.0) - (9.0 * (t * (z * y))));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(a * N[(27.0 * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t, 4.9e+110], N[(N[(N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] - N[(9.0 * N[(z * N[(y * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + t$95$1), $MachinePrecision], N[(t$95$1 + N[(N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] - N[(9.0 * N[(t * N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if t < 4.90000000000000002e110

   1. Initial program 94.8%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 94.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      2. sub-neg 94.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      3. associate-*l* 94.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      4. associate-*l* 95.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 95.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 95.3%

      \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)}\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 96.5%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - 9 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(t \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right)}\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

      2. *-commutative 96.5%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - 9 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot \left(t \cdot y\right)\right)}\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

   7. Simplified 96.5%

      \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{9 \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(t \cdot y\right)\right)}\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

   if 4.90000000000000002e110 < t

   1. Initial program 97.5%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 97.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      2. sub-neg 97.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      3. associate-*l* 87.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      4. associate-*l* 87.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 87.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)}\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 96.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq 4.9 \cdot 10^{+110}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot 2 - 9 \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(y \cdot t\right)\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) + \left(x \cdot 2 - 9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(z \cdot y\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 97.9% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t \leq 2.3 \cdot 10^{+86}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1 + \left(x \cdot 2 - 9 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1 + \left(x \cdot 2 - 9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(z \cdot y\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* a (* 27.0 b))))
   (if (<= t 2.3e+86)
     (+ t_1 (- (* x 2.0) (* 9.0 (* y (* z t)))))
     (+ t_1 (- (* x 2.0) (* 9.0 (* t (* z y))))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = a * (27.0 * b);
	double tmp;
	if (t <= 2.3e+86) {
		tmp = t_1 + ((x * 2.0) - (9.0 * (y * (z * t))));
	} else {
		tmp = t_1 + ((x * 2.0) - (9.0 * (t * (z * y))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = a * (27.0d0 * b)
    if (t <= 2.3d+86) then
        tmp = t_1 + ((x * 2.0d0) - (9.0d0 * (y * (z * t))))
    else
        tmp = t_1 + ((x * 2.0d0) - (9.0d0 * (t * (z * y))))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = a * (27.0 * b);
	double tmp;
	if (t <= 2.3e+86) {
		tmp = t_1 + ((x * 2.0) - (9.0 * (y * (z * t))));
	} else {
		tmp = t_1 + ((x * 2.0) - (9.0 * (t * (z * y))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	t_1 = a * (27.0 * b)
	tmp = 0
	if t <= 2.3e+86:
		tmp = t_1 + ((x * 2.0) - (9.0 * (y * (z * t))))
	else:
		tmp = t_1 + ((x * 2.0) - (9.0 * (t * (z * y))))
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64(a * Float64(27.0 * b))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t <= 2.3e+86)
		tmp = Float64(t_1 + Float64(Float64(x * 2.0) - Float64(9.0 * Float64(y * Float64(z * t)))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(t_1 + Float64(Float64(x * 2.0) - Float64(9.0 * Float64(t * Float64(z * y)))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = a * (27.0 * b);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t <= 2.3e+86)
		tmp = t_1 + ((x * 2.0) - (9.0 * (y * (z * t))));
	else
		tmp = t_1 + ((x * 2.0) - (9.0 * (t * (z * y))));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(a * N[(27.0 * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t, 2.3e+86], N[(t$95$1 + N[(N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] - N[(9.0 * N[(y * N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(t$95$1 + N[(N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] - N[(9.0 * N[(t * N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if t < 2.2999999999999999e86

   1. Initial program 94.7%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 94.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      2. sub-neg 94.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      3. associate-*l* 94.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      4. associate-*l* 95.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 95.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 95.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)}\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 95.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - 9 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)}\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

      2. associate-*l* 95.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - 9 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right)}\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

      3. *-commutative 95.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - 9 \cdot \left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z\right)}\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

   7. Simplified 95.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{9 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)\right)}\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

   if 2.2999999999999999e86 < t

   1. Initial program 97.7%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 97.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      2. sub-neg 97.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      3. associate-*l* 88.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      4. associate-*l* 88.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 88.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 97.7%

      \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)}\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 95.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq 2.3 \cdot 10^{+86}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) + \left(x \cdot 2 - 9 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) + \left(x \cdot 2 - 9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(z \cdot y\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 77.3% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq 2.4 \cdot 10^{+78}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 2 + 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot \left(-9 \cdot \left(z \cdot y\right) + 27 \cdot \frac{a \cdot b}{t}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= t 2.4e+78)
   (+ (* x 2.0) (* 27.0 (* a b)))
   (* t (+ (* -9.0 (* z y)) (* 27.0 (/ (* a b) t))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (t <= 2.4e+78) {
		tmp = (x * 2.0) + (27.0 * (a * b));
	} else {
		tmp = t * ((-9.0 * (z * y)) + (27.0 * ((a * b) / t)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (t <= 2.4d+78) then
        tmp = (x * 2.0d0) + (27.0d0 * (a * b))
    else
        tmp = t * (((-9.0d0) * (z * y)) + (27.0d0 * ((a * b) / t)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (t <= 2.4e+78) {
		tmp = (x * 2.0) + (27.0 * (a * b));
	} else {
		tmp = t * ((-9.0 * (z * y)) + (27.0 * ((a * b) / t)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if t <= 2.4e+78:
		tmp = (x * 2.0) + (27.0 * (a * b))
	else:
		tmp = t * ((-9.0 * (z * y)) + (27.0 * ((a * b) / t)))
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t <= 2.4e+78)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * 2.0) + Float64(27.0 * Float64(a * b)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(t * Float64(Float64(-9.0 * Float64(z * y)) + Float64(27.0 * Float64(Float64(a * b) / t))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t <= 2.4e+78)
		tmp = (x * 2.0) + (27.0 * (a * b));
	else
		tmp = t * ((-9.0 * (z * y)) + (27.0 * ((a * b) / t)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[t, 2.4e+78], N[(N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(27.0 * N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(t * N[(N[(-9.0 * N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(27.0 * N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if t < 2.3999999999999999e78

   1. Initial program 94.7%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 94.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      2. sub-neg 94.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      3. associate-*l* 94.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      4. associate-*l* 95.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 95.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. pow1 95.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{{\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right)}^{1}}\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

      2. associate-*l* 95.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - {\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(9 \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)}}^{1}\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

      3. associate-*r* 95.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - {\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(9 \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)}\right)}^{1}\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 95.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{{\left(y \cdot \left(\left(9 \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)}^{1}}\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

   7. Taylor expanded in x around inf 67.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot x} + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

   8. Taylor expanded in a around 0 67.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot x + \color{blue}{27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]

   if 2.3999999999999999e78 < t

   1. Initial program 97.7%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 97.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      2. sub-neg 97.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      3. associate-*l* 88.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      4. associate-*l* 88.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 88.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. pow1 88.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{{\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right)}^{1}}\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

      2. associate-*l* 88.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - {\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(9 \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)}}^{1}\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

      3. associate-*r* 88.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - {\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(9 \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)}\right)}^{1}\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 88.3%

      \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{{\left(y \cdot \left(\left(9 \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)}^{1}}\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

   7. Taylor expanded in x around 0 78.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

   8. Taylor expanded in a around 0 78.4%

      \[\leadsto -9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right) + \color{blue}{27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 78.5%

         \[\leadsto -9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right) + \color{blue}{\left(27 \cdot a\right) \cdot b} \]

   10. Simplified 78.5%

       \[\leadsto -9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right) + \color{blue}{\left(27 \cdot a\right) \cdot b} \]

   11. Taylor expanded in t around inf 78.4%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(-9 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) + 27 \cdot \frac{a \cdot b}{t}\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 69.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq 2.4 \cdot 10^{+78}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 2 + 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot \left(-9 \cdot \left(z \cdot y\right) + 27 \cdot \frac{a \cdot b}{t}\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 76.9% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq 1.25 \cdot 10^{+71}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 2 + 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(z \cdot y\right)\right) + b \cdot \left(a \cdot 27\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= t 1.25e+71)
   (+ (* x 2.0) (* 27.0 (* a b)))
   (+ (* -9.0 (* t (* z y))) (* b (* a 27.0)))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (t <= 1.25e+71) {
		tmp = (x * 2.0) + (27.0 * (a * b));
	} else {
		tmp = (-9.0 * (t * (z * y))) + (b * (a * 27.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (t <= 1.25d+71) then
        tmp = (x * 2.0d0) + (27.0d0 * (a * b))
    else
        tmp = ((-9.0d0) * (t * (z * y))) + (b * (a * 27.0d0))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (t <= 1.25e+71) {
		tmp = (x * 2.0) + (27.0 * (a * b));
	} else {
		tmp = (-9.0 * (t * (z * y))) + (b * (a * 27.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if t <= 1.25e+71:
		tmp = (x * 2.0) + (27.0 * (a * b))
	else:
		tmp = (-9.0 * (t * (z * y))) + (b * (a * 27.0))
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t <= 1.25e+71)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * 2.0) + Float64(27.0 * Float64(a * b)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(-9.0 * Float64(t * Float64(z * y))) + Float64(b * Float64(a * 27.0)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t <= 1.25e+71)
		tmp = (x * 2.0) + (27.0 * (a * b));
	else
		tmp = (-9.0 * (t * (z * y))) + (b * (a * 27.0));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[t, 1.25e+71], N[(N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(27.0 * N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(-9.0 * N[(t * N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(b * N[(a * 27.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if t < 1.24999999999999993e71

   1. Initial program 94.7%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 94.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      2. sub-neg 94.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      3. associate-*l* 94.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      4. associate-*l* 95.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 95.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. pow1 95.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{{\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right)}^{1}}\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

      2. associate-*l* 95.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - {\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(9 \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)}}^{1}\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

      3. associate-*r* 95.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - {\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(9 \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)}\right)}^{1}\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 95.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{{\left(y \cdot \left(\left(9 \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)}^{1}}\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

   7. Taylor expanded in x around inf 67.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot x} + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

   8. Taylor expanded in a around 0 67.5%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot x + \color{blue}{27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]

   if 1.24999999999999993e71 < t

   1. Initial program 97.8%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 97.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      2. sub-neg 97.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      3. associate-*l* 88.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      4. associate-*l* 88.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 88.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. pow1 88.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{{\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right)}^{1}}\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

      2. associate-*l* 88.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - {\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(9 \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)}}^{1}\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

      3. associate-*r* 88.5%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - {\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(9 \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)}\right)}^{1}\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 88.5%

      \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{{\left(y \cdot \left(\left(9 \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)}^{1}}\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

   7. Taylor expanded in x around 0 78.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

   8. Taylor expanded in a around 0 78.8%

      \[\leadsto -9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right) + \color{blue}{27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 78.9%

         \[\leadsto -9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right) + \color{blue}{\left(27 \cdot a\right) \cdot b} \]

   10. Simplified 78.9%

       \[\leadsto -9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right) + \color{blue}{\left(27 \cdot a\right) \cdot b} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 69.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq 1.25 \cdot 10^{+71}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 2 + 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(z \cdot y\right)\right) + b \cdot \left(a \cdot 27\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 77.1% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq 7.2 \cdot 10^{+77}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 2 + 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) + -9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(z \cdot y\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= t 7.2e+77)
   (+ (* x 2.0) (* 27.0 (* a b)))
   (+ (* a (* 27.0 b)) (* -9.0 (* t (* z y))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (t <= 7.2e+77) {
		tmp = (x * 2.0) + (27.0 * (a * b));
	} else {
		tmp = (a * (27.0 * b)) + (-9.0 * (t * (z * y)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (t <= 7.2d+77) then
        tmp = (x * 2.0d0) + (27.0d0 * (a * b))
    else
        tmp = (a * (27.0d0 * b)) + ((-9.0d0) * (t * (z * y)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (t <= 7.2e+77) {
		tmp = (x * 2.0) + (27.0 * (a * b));
	} else {
		tmp = (a * (27.0 * b)) + (-9.0 * (t * (z * y)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if t <= 7.2e+77:
		tmp = (x * 2.0) + (27.0 * (a * b))
	else:
		tmp = (a * (27.0 * b)) + (-9.0 * (t * (z * y)))
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t <= 7.2e+77)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * 2.0) + Float64(27.0 * Float64(a * b)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * Float64(27.0 * b)) + Float64(-9.0 * Float64(t * Float64(z * y))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t <= 7.2e+77)
		tmp = (x * 2.0) + (27.0 * (a * b));
	else
		tmp = (a * (27.0 * b)) + (-9.0 * (t * (z * y)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[t, 7.2e+77], N[(N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(27.0 * N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(a * N[(27.0 * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(-9.0 * N[(t * N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if t < 7.1999999999999996e77

   1. Initial program 94.7%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 94.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      2. sub-neg 94.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      3. associate-*l* 94.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      4. associate-*l* 95.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 95.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. pow1 95.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{{\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right)}^{1}}\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

      2. associate-*l* 95.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - {\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(9 \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)}}^{1}\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

      3. associate-*r* 95.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - {\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(9 \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)}\right)}^{1}\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 95.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{{\left(y \cdot \left(\left(9 \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)}^{1}}\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

   7. Taylor expanded in x around inf 67.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot x} + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

   8. Taylor expanded in a around 0 67.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot x + \color{blue}{27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]

   if 7.1999999999999996e77 < t

   1. Initial program 97.7%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 97.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      2. sub-neg 97.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      3. associate-*l* 88.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      4. associate-*l* 88.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 88.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. pow1 88.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{{\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right)}^{1}}\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

      2. associate-*l* 88.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - {\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(9 \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)}}^{1}\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

      3. associate-*r* 88.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - {\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(9 \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)}\right)}^{1}\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 88.3%

      \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{{\left(y \cdot \left(\left(9 \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)}^{1}}\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

   7. Taylor expanded in x around 0 78.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 69.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq 7.2 \cdot 10^{+77}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 2 + 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) + -9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(z \cdot y\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 95.2% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b])\\ \\ a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) + \left(x \cdot 2 - 9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(z \cdot y\right)\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (* a (* 27.0 b)) (- (* x 2.0) (* 9.0 (* t (* z y))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return (a * (27.0 * b)) + ((x * 2.0) - (9.0 * (t * (z * y))));
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = (a * (27.0d0 * b)) + ((x * 2.0d0) - (9.0d0 * (t * (z * y))))
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return (a * (27.0 * b)) + ((x * 2.0) - (9.0 * (t * (z * y))));
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return (a * (27.0 * b)) + ((x * 2.0) - (9.0 * (t * (z * y))))

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(a * Float64(27.0 * b)) + Float64(Float64(x * 2.0) - Float64(9.0 * Float64(t * Float64(z * y)))))
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])){:}
function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = (a * (27.0 * b)) + ((x * 2.0) - (9.0 * (t * (z * y))));
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(a * N[(27.0 * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] - N[(9.0 * N[(t * N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 95.3%

   \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. sub-neg 95.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

   2. sub-neg 95.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

   3. associate-*l* 93.4%

      \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

   4. associate-*l* 93.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

3. Simplified 93.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 95.7%

   \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)}\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

6. Final simplification 95.7%

   \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) + \left(x \cdot 2 - 9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(z \cdot y\right)\right)\right) \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 64.4% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b])\\ \\ x \cdot 2 + 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b) :precision binary64 (+ (* x 2.0) (* 27.0 (* a b))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return (x * 2.0) + (27.0 * (a * b));
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = (x * 2.0d0) + (27.0d0 * (a * b))
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return (x * 2.0) + (27.0 * (a * b));
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return (x * 2.0) + (27.0 * (a * b))

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(x * 2.0) + Float64(27.0 * Float64(a * b)))
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])){:}
function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = (x * 2.0) + (27.0 * (a * b));
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(27.0 * N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 95.3%

   \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. sub-neg 95.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

   2. sub-neg 95.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

   3. associate-*l* 93.4%

      \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

   4. associate-*l* 93.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

3. Simplified 93.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. pow1 93.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{{\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right)}^{1}}\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

   2. associate-*l* 93.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - {\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(9 \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)}}^{1}\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

   3. associate-*r* 93.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - {\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(9 \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)}\right)}^{1}\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

6. Applied egg-rr 93.8%

   \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{{\left(y \cdot \left(\left(9 \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)}^{1}}\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

7. Taylor expanded in x around inf 60.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot x} + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

8. Taylor expanded in a around 0 61.0%

   \[\leadsto 2 \cdot x + \color{blue}{27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]

9. Final simplification 61.0%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot 2 + 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right) \]
10. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 31.1% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b])\\ \\ x \cdot 2 + \left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot -27 \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b) :precision binary64 (+ (* x 2.0) (* (* a b) -27.0)))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return (x * 2.0) + ((a * b) * -27.0);
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = (x * 2.0d0) + ((a * b) * (-27.0d0))
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return (x * 2.0) + ((a * b) * -27.0);
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return (x * 2.0) + ((a * b) * -27.0)

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(x * 2.0) + Float64(Float64(a * b) * -27.0))
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])){:}
function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = (x * 2.0) + ((a * b) * -27.0);
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] * -27.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 95.3%

   \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. sub-neg 95.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

   2. sub-neg 95.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

   3. associate-*l* 93.4%

      \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

   4. associate-*l* 93.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

3. Simplified 93.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. pow1 93.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{{\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right)}^{1}}\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

   2. associate-*l* 93.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - {\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(9 \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)}}^{1}\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

   3. associate-*r* 93.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - {\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(9 \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)}\right)}^{1}\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

6. Applied egg-rr 93.8%

   \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{{\left(y \cdot \left(\left(9 \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)}^{1}}\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

7. Taylor expanded in x around inf 60.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot x} + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]
8. Step-by-step derivation

   1. add-sqr-sqrt 34.9%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot x + \color{blue}{\sqrt{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \cdot \sqrt{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)}} \]

   2. sqrt-unprod 43.1%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot x + \color{blue}{\sqrt{\left(a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)\right) \cdot \left(a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)\right)}} \]

   3. pow2 43.1%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot x + \sqrt{\color{blue}{{\left(a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)\right)}^{2}}} \]

9. Applied egg-rr 43.1%

   \[\leadsto 2 \cdot x + \color{blue}{\sqrt{{\left(a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)\right)}^{2}}} \]

10. Taylor expanded in a around -inf 31.4%

    \[\leadsto 2 \cdot x + \color{blue}{-27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]

11. Final simplification 31.4%

    \[\leadsto x \cdot 2 + \left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot -27 \]
12. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 12: 31.1% accurate, 5.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b])\\ \\ x \cdot 2 \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b) :precision binary64 (* x 2.0))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return x * 2.0;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = x * 2.0d0
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return x * 2.0;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return x * 2.0

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(x * 2.0)
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])){:}
function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = x * 2.0;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 95.3%

   \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. sub-neg 95.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

   2. sub-neg 95.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

   3. associate-*l* 93.4%

      \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

   4. associate-*l* 93.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

3. Simplified 93.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. pow1 93.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{{\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right)}^{1}}\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

   2. associate-*l* 93.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - {\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(9 \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)}}^{1}\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

   3. associate-*r* 93.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - {\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(9 \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)}\right)}^{1}\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

6. Applied egg-rr 93.8%

   \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{{\left(y \cdot \left(\left(9 \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)}^{1}}\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

7. Taylor expanded in x around inf 60.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot x} + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]
8. Step-by-step derivation

   1. add-sqr-sqrt 34.9%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot x + \color{blue}{\sqrt{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \cdot \sqrt{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)}} \]

   2. sqrt-unprod 43.1%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot x + \color{blue}{\sqrt{\left(a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)\right) \cdot \left(a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)\right)}} \]

   3. pow2 43.1%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot x + \sqrt{\color{blue}{{\left(a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)\right)}^{2}}} \]

9. Applied egg-rr 43.1%

   \[\leadsto 2 \cdot x + \color{blue}{\sqrt{{\left(a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)\right)}^{2}}} \]

10. Taylor expanded in x around inf 31.2%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot x} \]

11. Final simplification 31.2%

    \[\leadsto x \cdot 2 \]
12. Add Preprocessing

Developer target: 94.7% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y < 7.590524218811189 \cdot 10^{-161}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot 2 - 9 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)\right)\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (< y 7.590524218811189e-161)
   (+ (- (* x 2.0) (* (* (* y 9.0) z) t)) (* a (* 27.0 b)))
   (+ (- (* x 2.0) (* 9.0 (* y (* t z)))) (* (* a 27.0) b))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (y < 7.590524218811189e-161) {
		tmp = ((x * 2.0) - (((y * 9.0) * z) * t)) + (a * (27.0 * b));
	} else {
		tmp = ((x * 2.0) - (9.0 * (y * (t * z)))) + ((a * 27.0) * b);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y < 7.590524218811189d-161) then
        tmp = ((x * 2.0d0) - (((y * 9.0d0) * z) * t)) + (a * (27.0d0 * b))
    else
        tmp = ((x * 2.0d0) - (9.0d0 * (y * (t * z)))) + ((a * 27.0d0) * b)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (y < 7.590524218811189e-161) {
		tmp = ((x * 2.0) - (((y * 9.0) * z) * t)) + (a * (27.0 * b));
	} else {
		tmp = ((x * 2.0) - (9.0 * (y * (t * z)))) + ((a * 27.0) * b);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if y < 7.590524218811189e-161:
		tmp = ((x * 2.0) - (((y * 9.0) * z) * t)) + (a * (27.0 * b))
	else:
		tmp = ((x * 2.0) - (9.0 * (y * (t * z)))) + ((a * 27.0) * b)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y < 7.590524218811189e-161)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(x * 2.0) - Float64(Float64(Float64(y * 9.0) * z) * t)) + Float64(a * Float64(27.0 * b)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(x * 2.0) - Float64(9.0 * Float64(y * Float64(t * z)))) + Float64(Float64(a * 27.0) * b));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y < 7.590524218811189e-161)
		tmp = ((x * 2.0) - (((y * 9.0) * z) * t)) + (a * (27.0 * b));
	else
		tmp = ((x * 2.0) - (9.0 * (y * (t * z)))) + ((a * 27.0) * b);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Less[y, 7.590524218811189e-161], N[(N[(N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(N[(y * 9.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * N[(27.0 * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] - N[(9.0 * N[(y * N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * 27.0), $MachinePrecision] * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024111 
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
  :name "Diagrams.Solve.Polynomial:cubForm  from diagrams-solve-0.1, A"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (if (< y 7.590524218811189e-161) (+ (- (* x 2.0) (* (* (* y 9.0) z) t)) (* a (* 27.0 b))) (+ (- (* x 2.0) (* 9.0 (* y (* t z)))) (* (* a 27.0) b)))

  (+ (- (* x 2.0) (* (* (* y 9.0) z) t)) (* (* a 27.0) b)))