Logistic function from Lakshay Garg

Percentage Accurate: 54.8% → 99.8%

Time: 8.9s

Alternatives: 5

Speedup: 18.1×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (- (/ 2.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (* -2.0 x)))) 1.0))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return (2.0 / (1.0 + exp((-2.0 * x)))) - 1.0;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = (2.0d0 / (1.0d0 + exp(((-2.0d0) * x)))) - 1.0d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return (2.0 / (1.0 + Math.exp((-2.0 * x)))) - 1.0;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	return (2.0 / (1.0 + math.exp((-2.0 * x)))) - 1.0

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return Float64(Float64(2.0 / Float64(1.0 + exp(Float64(-2.0 * x)))) - 1.0)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = (2.0 / (1.0 + exp((-2.0 * x)))) - 1.0;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := N[(N[(2.0 / N[(1.0 + N[Exp[N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 54.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (- (/ 2.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (* -2.0 x)))) 1.0))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return (2.0 / (1.0 + exp((-2.0 * x)))) - 1.0;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = (2.0d0 / (1.0d0 + exp(((-2.0d0) * x)))) - 1.0d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return (2.0 / (1.0 + Math.exp((-2.0 * x)))) - 1.0;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	return (2.0 / (1.0 + math.exp((-2.0 * x)))) - 1.0

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return Float64(Float64(2.0 / Float64(1.0 + exp(Float64(-2.0 * x)))) - 1.0)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = (2.0 / (1.0 + exp((-2.0 * x)))) - 1.0;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := N[(N[(2.0 / N[(1.0 + N[Exp[N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.8% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;-2 \cdot x \leq -100 \lor \neg \left(-2 \cdot x \leq 0.05\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} + -1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 + {x}^{2} \cdot \left({x}^{2} \cdot \left(0.13333333333333333 + -0.05396825396825397 \cdot \left(x \cdot x\right)\right) - 0.3333333333333333\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* -2.0 x) -100.0) (not (<= (* -2.0 x) 0.05)))
   (+ (/ 2.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (* -2.0 x)))) -1.0)
   (*
    x
    (+
     1.0
     (*
      (pow x 2.0)
      (-
       (* (pow x 2.0) (+ 0.13333333333333333 (* -0.05396825396825397 (* x x))))
       0.3333333333333333))))))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (((-2.0 * x) <= -100.0) || !((-2.0 * x) <= 0.05)) {
		tmp = (2.0 / (1.0 + exp((-2.0 * x)))) + -1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = x * (1.0 + (pow(x, 2.0) * ((pow(x, 2.0) * (0.13333333333333333 + (-0.05396825396825397 * (x * x)))) - 0.3333333333333333)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((((-2.0d0) * x) <= (-100.0d0)) .or. (.not. (((-2.0d0) * x) <= 0.05d0))) then
        tmp = (2.0d0 / (1.0d0 + exp(((-2.0d0) * x)))) + (-1.0d0)
    else
        tmp = x * (1.0d0 + ((x ** 2.0d0) * (((x ** 2.0d0) * (0.13333333333333333d0 + ((-0.05396825396825397d0) * (x * x)))) - 0.3333333333333333d0)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (((-2.0 * x) <= -100.0) || !((-2.0 * x) <= 0.05)) {
		tmp = (2.0 / (1.0 + Math.exp((-2.0 * x)))) + -1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = x * (1.0 + (Math.pow(x, 2.0) * ((Math.pow(x, 2.0) * (0.13333333333333333 + (-0.05396825396825397 * (x * x)))) - 0.3333333333333333)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	tmp = 0
	if ((-2.0 * x) <= -100.0) or not ((-2.0 * x) <= 0.05):
		tmp = (2.0 / (1.0 + math.exp((-2.0 * x)))) + -1.0
	else:
		tmp = x * (1.0 + (math.pow(x, 2.0) * ((math.pow(x, 2.0) * (0.13333333333333333 + (-0.05396825396825397 * (x * x)))) - 0.3333333333333333)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(-2.0 * x) <= -100.0) || !(Float64(-2.0 * x) <= 0.05))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(2.0 / Float64(1.0 + exp(Float64(-2.0 * x)))) + -1.0);
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(1.0 + Float64((x ^ 2.0) * Float64(Float64((x ^ 2.0) * Float64(0.13333333333333333 + Float64(-0.05396825396825397 * Float64(x * x)))) - 0.3333333333333333))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((-2.0 * x) <= -100.0) || ~(((-2.0 * x) <= 0.05)))
		tmp = (2.0 / (1.0 + exp((-2.0 * x)))) + -1.0;
	else
		tmp = x * (1.0 + ((x ^ 2.0) * (((x ^ 2.0) * (0.13333333333333333 + (-0.05396825396825397 * (x * x)))) - 0.3333333333333333)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision], -100.0], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision], 0.05]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(2.0 / N[(1.0 + N[Exp[N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * N[(1.0 + N[(N[Power[x, 2.0], $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[(N[Power[x, 2.0], $MachinePrecision] * N[(0.13333333333333333 + N[(-0.05396825396825397 * N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - 0.3333333333333333), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 #s(literal -2 binary64) x) < -100 or 0.050000000000000003 < (*.f64 #s(literal -2 binary64) x)

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   if -100 < (*.f64 #s(literal -2 binary64) x) < 0.050000000000000003

   1. Initial program 7.7%

      \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + {x}^{2} \cdot \left({x}^{2} \cdot \left(0.13333333333333333 + -0.05396825396825397 \cdot {x}^{2}\right) - 0.3333333333333333\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(1 + {x}^{2} \cdot \left({x}^{2} \cdot \left(0.13333333333333333 + -0.05396825396825397 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot x\right)}\right) - 0.3333333333333333\right)\right) \]

   5. Applied egg-rr 100.0%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(1 + {x}^{2} \cdot \left({x}^{2} \cdot \left(0.13333333333333333 + -0.05396825396825397 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot x\right)}\right) - 0.3333333333333333\right)\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;-2 \cdot x \leq -100 \lor \neg \left(-2 \cdot x \leq 0.05\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} + -1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 + {x}^{2} \cdot \left({x}^{2} \cdot \left(0.13333333333333333 + -0.05396825396825397 \cdot \left(x \cdot x\right)\right) - 0.3333333333333333\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 99.5% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;-2 \cdot x \leq -100 \lor \neg \left(-2 \cdot x \leq 10^{-8}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} + -1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* -2.0 x) -100.0) (not (<= (* -2.0 x) 1e-8)))
   (+ (/ 2.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (* -2.0 x)))) -1.0)
   x))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (((-2.0 * x) <= -100.0) || !((-2.0 * x) <= 1e-8)) {
		tmp = (2.0 / (1.0 + exp((-2.0 * x)))) + -1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((((-2.0d0) * x) <= (-100.0d0)) .or. (.not. (((-2.0d0) * x) <= 1d-8))) then
        tmp = (2.0d0 / (1.0d0 + exp(((-2.0d0) * x)))) + (-1.0d0)
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (((-2.0 * x) <= -100.0) || !((-2.0 * x) <= 1e-8)) {
		tmp = (2.0 / (1.0 + Math.exp((-2.0 * x)))) + -1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	tmp = 0
	if ((-2.0 * x) <= -100.0) or not ((-2.0 * x) <= 1e-8):
		tmp = (2.0 / (1.0 + math.exp((-2.0 * x)))) + -1.0
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(-2.0 * x) <= -100.0) || !(Float64(-2.0 * x) <= 1e-8))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(2.0 / Float64(1.0 + exp(Float64(-2.0 * x)))) + -1.0);
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((-2.0 * x) <= -100.0) || ~(((-2.0 * x) <= 1e-8)))
		tmp = (2.0 / (1.0 + exp((-2.0 * x)))) + -1.0;
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision], -100.0], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision], 1e-8]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(2.0 / N[(1.0 + N[Exp[N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision], x]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 #s(literal -2 binary64) x) < -100 or 1e-8 < (*.f64 #s(literal -2 binary64) x)

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   if -100 < (*.f64 #s(literal -2 binary64) x) < 1e-8

   1. Initial program 7.1%

      \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;-2 \cdot x \leq -100 \lor \neg \left(-2 \cdot x \leq 10^{-8}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} + -1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 78.6% accurate, 9.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -0.66:\\ \;\;\;\;-1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x \cdot 2}{x + 2}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -0.66) -1.0 (/ (* x 2.0) (+ x 2.0))))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -0.66) {
		tmp = -1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = (x * 2.0) / (x + 2.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-0.66d0)) then
        tmp = -1.0d0
    else
        tmp = (x * 2.0d0) / (x + 2.0d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -0.66) {
		tmp = -1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = (x * 2.0) / (x + 2.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -0.66:
		tmp = -1.0
	else:
		tmp = (x * 2.0) / (x + 2.0)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -0.66)
		tmp = -1.0;
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * 2.0) / Float64(x + 2.0));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -0.66)
		tmp = -1.0;
	else
		tmp = (x * 2.0) / (x + 2.0);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := If[LessEqual[x, -0.66], -1.0, N[(N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] / N[(x + 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -0.660000000000000031

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 98.3%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2}{\color{blue}{2 + -2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 98.3%

         \[\leadsto \frac{2}{2 + \color{blue}{x \cdot -2}} - 1 \]

   5. Simplified 98.3%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2}{\color{blue}{2 + x \cdot -2}} - 1 \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1} \]

   if -0.660000000000000031 < x

   1. Initial program 40.9%

      \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 6.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + x\right)} - 1 \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 6.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + 1\right)} - 1 \]

   5. Simplified 6.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + 1\right)} - 1 \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. flip-- 6.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\left(x + 1\right) \cdot \left(x + 1\right) - 1 \cdot 1}{\left(x + 1\right) + 1}} \]

      2. metadata-eval 6.5%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\left(x + 1\right) \cdot \left(x + 1\right) - \color{blue}{1}}{\left(x + 1\right) + 1} \]

      3. difference-of-sqr-1 6.5%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(\left(x + 1\right) + 1\right) \cdot \left(\left(x + 1\right) - 1\right)}}{\left(x + 1\right) + 1} \]

      4. associate-+l+ 6.5%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(x + \left(1 + 1\right)\right)} \cdot \left(\left(x + 1\right) - 1\right)}{\left(x + 1\right) + 1} \]

      5. metadata-eval 6.5%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\left(x + \color{blue}{2}\right) \cdot \left(\left(x + 1\right) - 1\right)}{\left(x + 1\right) + 1} \]

      6. associate--l+ 65.6%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\left(x + 2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(1 - 1\right)\right)}}{\left(x + 1\right) + 1} \]

      7. metadata-eval 65.6%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\left(x + 2\right) \cdot \left(x + \color{blue}{0}\right)}{\left(x + 1\right) + 1} \]

      8. +-rgt-identity 65.6%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\left(x + 2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{x}}{\left(x + 1\right) + 1} \]

      9. associate-+l+ 65.6%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\left(x + 2\right) \cdot x}{\color{blue}{x + \left(1 + 1\right)}} \]

      10. metadata-eval 65.6%

          \[\leadsto \frac{\left(x + 2\right) \cdot x}{x + \color{blue}{2}} \]

   7. Applied egg-rr 65.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\left(x + 2\right) \cdot x}{x + 2}} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in x around 0 69.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{2 \cdot x}}{x + 2} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 69.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{x \cdot 2}}{x + 2} \]

   10. Simplified 69.7%

       \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{x \cdot 2}}{x + 2} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 75.7% accurate, 18.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1:\\ \;\;\;\;-1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (if (<= x -1.0) -1.0 x))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1.0) {
		tmp = -1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-1.0d0)) then
        tmp = -1.0d0
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1.0) {
		tmp = -1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -1.0:
		tmp = -1.0
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -1.0)
		tmp = -1.0;
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -1.0)
		tmp = -1.0;
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := If[LessEqual[x, -1.0], -1.0, x]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -1

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 98.3%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2}{\color{blue}{2 + -2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 98.3%

         \[\leadsto \frac{2}{2 + \color{blue}{x \cdot -2}} - 1 \]

   5. Simplified 98.3%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2}{\color{blue}{2 + x \cdot -2}} - 1 \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1} \]

   if -1 < x

   1. Initial program 40.9%

      \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 65.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 27.9% accurate, 109.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -1 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 -1.0)

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return -1.0;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = -1.0d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return -1.0;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	return -1.0

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return -1.0
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = -1.0;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := -1.0

Derivation

1. Initial program 53.1%

   \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 24.5%

   \[\leadsto \frac{2}{\color{blue}{2 + -2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 24.5%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2}{2 + \color{blue}{x \cdot -2}} - 1 \]

5. Simplified 24.5%

   \[\leadsto \frac{2}{\color{blue}{2 + x \cdot -2}} - 1 \]

6. Taylor expanded in x around inf 23.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1} \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024110 
(FPCore (x y)
  :name "Logistic function from Lakshay Garg"
  :precision binary64
  (- (/ 2.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (* -2.0 x)))) 1.0))