Linear.V2:$cdot from linear-1.19.1.3, A

Percentage Accurate: 99.0% → 99.4%

Time: 4.1s

Alternatives: 4

Speedup: 1.0×

• 23.2% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot y + z \cdot t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (+ (* x y) (* z t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x * y) + (z * t);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (x * y) + (z * t)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x * y) + (z * t);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (x * y) + (z * t)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (x * y) + (z * t);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot y + z \cdot t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (+ (* x y) (* z t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x * y) + (z * t);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (x * y) + (z * t)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x * y) + (z * t);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (x * y) + (z * t)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (x * y) + (z * t);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.4% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, z \cdot t\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (fma y x (* z t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return fma(y, x, (z * t));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return fma(y, x, Float64(z * t))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(y * x + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.4%

   \[x \cdot y + z \cdot t \]
2. Add Preprocessing

4. Applied egg-rr 0

   \[\leadsto expr\]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 74.7% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -1.15 \cdot 10^{-45}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 7.8 \cdot 10^{+112}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* x y) -1.15e-45)
   (* x y)
   (if (<= (* x y) 7.8e+112) (* t z) (* x y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -1.15e-45) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else if ((x * y) <= 7.8e+112) {
		tmp = t * z;
	} else {
		tmp = x * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x * y) <= (-1.15d-45)) then
        tmp = x * y
    else if ((x * y) <= 7.8d+112) then
        tmp = t * z
    else
        tmp = x * y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -1.15e-45) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else if ((x * y) <= 7.8e+112) {
		tmp = t * z;
	} else {
		tmp = x * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (x * y) <= -1.15e-45:
		tmp = x * y
	elif (x * y) <= 7.8e+112:
		tmp = t * z
	else:
		tmp = x * y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(x * y) <= -1.15e-45)
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= 7.8e+112)
		tmp = Float64(t * z);
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x * y) <= -1.15e-45)
		tmp = x * y;
	elseif ((x * y) <= 7.8e+112)
		tmp = t * z;
	else
		tmp = x * y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -1.15e-45], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 7.8e+112], N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -1.14999999999999996e-45 or 7.79999999999999937e112 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 96.7%

      \[x \cdot y + z \cdot t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 0

      \[\leadsto expr\]

   5. Simplified 0

      \[\leadsto expr\]

   if -1.14999999999999996e-45 < (*.f64 x y) < 7.79999999999999937e112

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot y + z \cdot t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 0

      \[\leadsto expr\]

   5. Simplified 0

      \[\leadsto expr\]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 99.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot y + z \cdot t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (+ (* x y) (* z t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x * y) + (z * t);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (x * y) + (z * t)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x * y) + (z * t);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (x * y) + (z * t)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (x * y) + (z * t);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.4%

   \[x \cdot y + z \cdot t \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 51.7% accurate, 2.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ t \cdot z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (* t z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return t * z;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = t * z
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return t * z;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return t * z

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(t * z)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = t * z;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.4%

   \[x \cdot y + z \cdot t \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 0

   \[\leadsto expr\]

5. Simplified 0

   \[\leadsto expr\]
6. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024110 
(FPCore (x y z t)
  :name "Linear.V2:$cdot from linear-1.19.1.3, A"
  :precision binary64
  (+ (* x y) (* z t)))