Linear.Quaternion:$c/ from linear-1.19.1.3, A

Percentage Accurate: 98.4% → 98.5%

Time: 8.6s

Alternatives: 6

Speedup: 0.9×

• 34.5% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (+ (+ (* x y) (* z z)) (* z z)) (* z z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (((x * y) + (z * z)) + (z * z)) + (z * z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (((x * y) + (z * z)) + (z * z)) + (z * z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (((x * y) + (z * z)) + (z * z)) + (z * z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (((x * y) + (z * z)) + (z * z)) + (z * z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * z)) + Float64(z * z)) + Float64(z * z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (((x * y) + (z * z)) + (z * z)) + (z * z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 98.4% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (+ (+ (* x y) (* z z)) (* z z)) (* z z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (((x * y) + (z * z)) + (z * z)) + (z * z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (((x * y) + (z * z)) + (z * z)) + (z * z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (((x * y) + (z * z)) + (z * z)) + (z * z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (((x * y) + (z * z)) + (z * z)) + (z * z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * z)) + Float64(z * z)) + Float64(z * z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (((x * y) + (z * z)) + (z * z)) + (z * z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 98.5% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \cdot z \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(z \cdot 3\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* z z) INFINITY) (+ (* x y) (* z (* z 3.0))) (* z z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z * z) <= ((double) INFINITY)) {
		tmp = (x * y) + (z * (z * 3.0));
	} else {
		tmp = z * z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z * z) <= Double.POSITIVE_INFINITY) {
		tmp = (x * y) + (z * (z * 3.0));
	} else {
		tmp = z * z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z * z) <= math.inf:
		tmp = (x * y) + (z * (z * 3.0))
	else:
		tmp = z * z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(z * z) <= Inf)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * Float64(z * 3.0)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * z);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z * z) <= Inf)
		tmp = (x * y) + (z * (z * 3.0));
	else
		tmp = z * z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision], Infinity], N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * N[(z * 3.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 z z) < +inf.0

   1. Initial program 96.8%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z \]

   3. Simplified 0

      \[\leadsto expr\]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   if +inf.0 < (*.f64 z z)

   1. Initial program 96.8%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 0

      \[\leadsto expr\]

   5. Simplified 0

      \[\leadsto expr\]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around 0 0

      \[\leadsto expr\]

   8. Simplified 0

      \[\leadsto expr\]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 85.4% accurate, 1.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \cdot z \leq 10^{-50}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + z \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(z \cdot 3\right) \cdot z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* z z) 1e-50) (+ (* x y) (* z z)) (* (* z 3.0) z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z * z) <= 1e-50) {
		tmp = (x * y) + (z * z);
	} else {
		tmp = (z * 3.0) * z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z * z) <= 1d-50) then
        tmp = (x * y) + (z * z)
    else
        tmp = (z * 3.0d0) * z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z * z) <= 1e-50) {
		tmp = (x * y) + (z * z);
	} else {
		tmp = (z * 3.0) * z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z * z) <= 1e-50:
		tmp = (x * y) + (z * z)
	else:
		tmp = (z * 3.0) * z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(z * z) <= 1e-50)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * z));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(z * 3.0) * z);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z * z) <= 1e-50)
		tmp = (x * y) + (z * z);
	else
		tmp = (z * 3.0) * z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision], 1e-50], N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(z * 3.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 z z) < 1.00000000000000001e-50

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 0

      \[\leadsto expr\]

   5. Simplified 0

      \[\leadsto expr\]

   if 1.00000000000000001e-50 < (*.f64 z z)

   1. Initial program 93.8%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z \]

   3. Simplified 0

      \[\leadsto expr\]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 0

      \[\leadsto expr\]

   7. Simplified 0

      \[\leadsto expr\]

   9. Applied egg-rr 0

      \[\leadsto expr\]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 84.7% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \cdot z \leq 10^{-50}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(z \cdot 3\right) \cdot z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* z z) 1e-50) (* x y) (* (* z 3.0) z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z * z) <= 1e-50) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = (z * 3.0) * z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z * z) <= 1d-50) then
        tmp = x * y
    else
        tmp = (z * 3.0d0) * z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z * z) <= 1e-50) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = (z * 3.0) * z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z * z) <= 1e-50:
		tmp = x * y
	else:
		tmp = (z * 3.0) * z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(z * z) <= 1e-50)
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(z * 3.0) * z);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z * z) <= 1e-50)
		tmp = x * y;
	else
		tmp = (z * 3.0) * z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision], 1e-50], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(z * 3.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 z z) < 1.00000000000000001e-50

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z \]

   3. Simplified 0

      \[\leadsto expr\]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 0

      \[\leadsto expr\]

   7. Simplified 0

      \[\leadsto expr\]

   if 1.00000000000000001e-50 < (*.f64 z z)

   1. Initial program 93.8%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z \]

   3. Simplified 0

      \[\leadsto expr\]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 0

      \[\leadsto expr\]

   7. Simplified 0

      \[\leadsto expr\]

   9. Applied egg-rr 0

      \[\leadsto expr\]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 84.7% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \cdot z \leq 2.8 \cdot 10^{-49}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;3 \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* z z) 2.8e-49) (* x y) (* 3.0 (* z z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z * z) <= 2.8e-49) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = 3.0 * (z * z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z * z) <= 2.8d-49) then
        tmp = x * y
    else
        tmp = 3.0d0 * (z * z)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z * z) <= 2.8e-49) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = 3.0 * (z * z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z * z) <= 2.8e-49:
		tmp = x * y
	else:
		tmp = 3.0 * (z * z)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(z * z) <= 2.8e-49)
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	else
		tmp = Float64(3.0 * Float64(z * z));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z * z) <= 2.8e-49)
		tmp = x * y;
	else
		tmp = 3.0 * (z * z);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision], 2.8e-49], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], N[(3.0 * N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 z z) < 2.79999999999999997e-49

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z \]

   3. Simplified 0

      \[\leadsto expr\]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 0

      \[\leadsto expr\]

   7. Simplified 0

      \[\leadsto expr\]

   if 2.79999999999999997e-49 < (*.f64 z z)

   1. Initial program 93.8%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z \]

   3. Simplified 0

      \[\leadsto expr\]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 0

      \[\leadsto expr\]

   7. Simplified 0

      \[\leadsto expr\]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 74.9% accurate, 1.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \cdot z \leq 2.55 \cdot 10^{+296}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* z z) 2.55e+296) (* x y) (* z z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z * z) <= 2.55e+296) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = z * z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z * z) <= 2.55d+296) then
        tmp = x * y
    else
        tmp = z * z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z * z) <= 2.55e+296) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = z * z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z * z) <= 2.55e+296:
		tmp = x * y
	else:
		tmp = z * z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(z * z) <= 2.55e+296)
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * z);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z * z) <= 2.55e+296)
		tmp = x * y;
	else
		tmp = z * z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision], 2.55e+296], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 z z) < 2.5500000000000001e296

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z \]

   3. Simplified 0

      \[\leadsto expr\]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 0

      \[\leadsto expr\]

   7. Simplified 0

      \[\leadsto expr\]

   if 2.5500000000000001e296 < (*.f64 z z)

   1. Initial program 89.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 0

      \[\leadsto expr\]

   5. Simplified 0

      \[\leadsto expr\]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around 0 0

      \[\leadsto expr\]

   8. Simplified 0

      \[\leadsto expr\]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 53.2% accurate, 5.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* x y))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x * y;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x * y
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x * y;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x * y

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x * y)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x * y;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 96.8%

   \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z \]

3. Simplified 0

   \[\leadsto expr\]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 0

   \[\leadsto expr\]

7. Simplified 0

   \[\leadsto expr\]
8. Add Preprocessing

Developer target: 98.5% accurate, 1.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(3 \cdot z\right) \cdot z + y \cdot x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* (* 3.0 z) z) (* y x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((3.0 * z) * z) + (y * x);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = ((3.0d0 * z) * z) + (y * x)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((3.0 * z) * z) + (y * x);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return ((3.0 * z) * z) + (y * x)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(3.0 * z) * z) + Float64(y * x))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = ((3.0 * z) * z) + (y * x);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(3.0 * z), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024110 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Linear.Quaternion:$c/ from linear-1.19.1.3, A"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (+ (* (* 3.0 z) z) (* y x))

  (+ (+ (+ (* x y) (* z z)) (* z z)) (* z z)))