Graphics.Rendering.Plot.Render.Plot.Legend:renderLegendInside from plot-0.2.3.4

Percentage Accurate: 99.9% → 99.9%

Time: 8.2s

Alternatives: 8

Speedup: 1.2×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (+ (+ (+ (+ x y) y) x) z) x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((((x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = ((((x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((((x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return ((((x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = ((((x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] + y), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (+ (+ (+ (+ x y) y) x) z) x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((((x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = ((((x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((((x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return ((((x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = ((((x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] + y), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.9% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ z - \mathsf{fma}\left(x, -3, y \cdot -2\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- z (fma x -3.0 (* y -2.0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z - fma(x, -3.0, (y * -2.0));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(z - fma(x, -3.0, Float64(y * -2.0)))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(z - N[(x * -3.0 + N[(y * -2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right)\right)} + x \]

   2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + x\right)} \]

   3. remove-double-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + x\right)\right)\right)} \]

   4. unsub-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z - \left(-\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + x\right)\right)} \]

   5. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto z - \left(-\color{blue}{\left(x + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right)\right)}\right) \]

   6. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto z - \left(-\left(x + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right)\right)}\right)\right) \]

   7. associate-+l+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto z - \left(-\left(x + \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(y + y\right)\right)}\right)\right)\right) \]

   8. associate-+r+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto z - \left(-\left(x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + x\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right)}\right)\right) \]

   9. associate-+r+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto z - \left(-\color{blue}{\left(\left(x + \left(x + x\right)\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right)}\right) \]

   10. distribute-neg-in 99.9%

       \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{\left(\left(-\left(x + \left(x + x\right)\right)\right) + \left(-\left(y + y\right)\right)\right)} \]

   11. distribute-neg-out 99.9%

       \[\leadsto z - \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(-x\right) + \left(-\left(x + x\right)\right)\right)} + \left(-\left(y + y\right)\right)\right) \]

   12. neg-mul-1 99.9%

       \[\leadsto z - \left(\left(\color{blue}{-1 \cdot x} + \left(-\left(x + x\right)\right)\right) + \left(-\left(y + y\right)\right)\right) \]

   13. count-2 99.9%

       \[\leadsto z - \left(\left(-1 \cdot x + \left(-\color{blue}{2 \cdot x}\right)\right) + \left(-\left(y + y\right)\right)\right) \]

   14. distribute-lft-neg-in 99.9%

       \[\leadsto z - \left(\left(-1 \cdot x + \color{blue}{\left(-2\right) \cdot x}\right) + \left(-\left(y + y\right)\right)\right) \]

   15. metadata-eval 99.9%

       \[\leadsto z - \left(\left(-1 \cdot x + \color{blue}{-2} \cdot x\right) + \left(-\left(y + y\right)\right)\right) \]

   16. metadata-eval 99.9%

       \[\leadsto z - \left(\left(-1 \cdot x + \color{blue}{\left(-1 + -1\right)} \cdot x\right) + \left(-\left(y + y\right)\right)\right) \]

   17. distribute-rgt-out 99.9%

       \[\leadsto z - \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(-1 + \left(-1 + -1\right)\right)} + \left(-\left(y + y\right)\right)\right) \]

   18. distribute-neg-out 99.9%

       \[\leadsto z - \left(x \cdot \left(-1 + \left(-1 + -1\right)\right) + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-y\right) + \left(-y\right)\right)}\right) \]

   19. fma-define 100.0%

       \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, -1 + \left(-1 + -1\right), \left(-y\right) + \left(-y\right)\right)} \]

3. Simplified 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z - \mathsf{fma}\left(x, -3, y \cdot -2\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 52.8% accurate, 0.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.35 \cdot 10^{+85}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 3\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -8.2 \cdot 10^{-58}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -7 \cdot 10^{-101}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -1.6 \cdot 10^{-186}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -5.4 \cdot 10^{-258}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -1.45 \cdot 10^{-294}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 2 \cdot 10^{-152}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 1.95 \cdot 10^{-16}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 3\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -1.35e+85)
   (* x 3.0)
   (if (<= x -8.2e-58)
     z
     (if (<= x -7e-101)
       (* y 2.0)
       (if (<= x -1.6e-186)
         z
         (if (<= x -5.4e-258)
           (* y 2.0)
           (if (<= x -1.45e-294)
             z
             (if (<= x 2e-152)
               (* y 2.0)
               (if (<= x 1.95e-16) z (* x 3.0))))))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1.35e+85) {
		tmp = x * 3.0;
	} else if (x <= -8.2e-58) {
		tmp = z;
	} else if (x <= -7e-101) {
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	} else if (x <= -1.6e-186) {
		tmp = z;
	} else if (x <= -5.4e-258) {
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	} else if (x <= -1.45e-294) {
		tmp = z;
	} else if (x <= 2e-152) {
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	} else if (x <= 1.95e-16) {
		tmp = z;
	} else {
		tmp = x * 3.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-1.35d+85)) then
        tmp = x * 3.0d0
    else if (x <= (-8.2d-58)) then
        tmp = z
    else if (x <= (-7d-101)) then
        tmp = y * 2.0d0
    else if (x <= (-1.6d-186)) then
        tmp = z
    else if (x <= (-5.4d-258)) then
        tmp = y * 2.0d0
    else if (x <= (-1.45d-294)) then
        tmp = z
    else if (x <= 2d-152) then
        tmp = y * 2.0d0
    else if (x <= 1.95d-16) then
        tmp = z
    else
        tmp = x * 3.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1.35e+85) {
		tmp = x * 3.0;
	} else if (x <= -8.2e-58) {
		tmp = z;
	} else if (x <= -7e-101) {
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	} else if (x <= -1.6e-186) {
		tmp = z;
	} else if (x <= -5.4e-258) {
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	} else if (x <= -1.45e-294) {
		tmp = z;
	} else if (x <= 2e-152) {
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	} else if (x <= 1.95e-16) {
		tmp = z;
	} else {
		tmp = x * 3.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -1.35e+85:
		tmp = x * 3.0
	elif x <= -8.2e-58:
		tmp = z
	elif x <= -7e-101:
		tmp = y * 2.0
	elif x <= -1.6e-186:
		tmp = z
	elif x <= -5.4e-258:
		tmp = y * 2.0
	elif x <= -1.45e-294:
		tmp = z
	elif x <= 2e-152:
		tmp = y * 2.0
	elif x <= 1.95e-16:
		tmp = z
	else:
		tmp = x * 3.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -1.35e+85)
		tmp = Float64(x * 3.0);
	elseif (x <= -8.2e-58)
		tmp = z;
	elseif (x <= -7e-101)
		tmp = Float64(y * 2.0);
	elseif (x <= -1.6e-186)
		tmp = z;
	elseif (x <= -5.4e-258)
		tmp = Float64(y * 2.0);
	elseif (x <= -1.45e-294)
		tmp = z;
	elseif (x <= 2e-152)
		tmp = Float64(y * 2.0);
	elseif (x <= 1.95e-16)
		tmp = z;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * 3.0);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -1.35e+85)
		tmp = x * 3.0;
	elseif (x <= -8.2e-58)
		tmp = z;
	elseif (x <= -7e-101)
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	elseif (x <= -1.6e-186)
		tmp = z;
	elseif (x <= -5.4e-258)
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	elseif (x <= -1.45e-294)
		tmp = z;
	elseif (x <= 2e-152)
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	elseif (x <= 1.95e-16)
		tmp = z;
	else
		tmp = x * 3.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[x, -1.35e+85], N[(x * 3.0), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[x, -8.2e-58], z, If[LessEqual[x, -7e-101], N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[x, -1.6e-186], z, If[LessEqual[x, -5.4e-258], N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[x, -1.45e-294], z, If[LessEqual[x, 2e-152], N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[x, 1.95e-16], z, N[(x * 3.0), $MachinePrecision]]]]]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if x < -1.34999999999999992e85 or 1.94999999999999989e-16 < x

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + \left(z + x\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)} + \left(y + x\right)\right) + \left(z + x\right) \]

      4. count-2 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + x\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      5. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      6. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + z\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \left(x + z\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 68.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{3 \cdot x} \]

   if -1.34999999999999992e85 < x < -8.20000000000000056e-58 or -6.99999999999999989e-101 < x < -1.6e-186 or -5.39999999999999991e-258 < x < -1.45e-294 or 2.00000000000000013e-152 < x < 1.94999999999999989e-16

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + \left(z + x\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)} + \left(y + x\right)\right) + \left(z + x\right) \]

      4. count-2 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + x\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      5. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      6. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + z\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \left(x + z\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 61.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]

   if -8.20000000000000056e-58 < x < -6.99999999999999989e-101 or -1.6e-186 < x < -5.39999999999999991e-258 or -1.45e-294 < x < 2.00000000000000013e-152

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + \left(z + x\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)} + \left(y + x\right)\right) + \left(z + x\right) \]

      4. count-2 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + x\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      5. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      6. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + z\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \left(x + z\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 63.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot y} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 64.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.35 \cdot 10^{+85}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 3\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -8.2 \cdot 10^{-58}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -7 \cdot 10^{-101}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -1.6 \cdot 10^{-186}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -5.4 \cdot 10^{-258}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -1.45 \cdot 10^{-294}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 2 \cdot 10^{-152}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 1.95 \cdot 10^{-16}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 3\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 84.1% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -2.85 \cdot 10^{+119} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 7.2 \cdot 10^{-15} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 3.9 \cdot 10^{+52}\right) \land x \leq 4.3 \cdot 10^{+126}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z - x \cdot -3\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z - y \cdot -2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -2.85e+119)
         (not (or (<= x 7.2e-15) (and (not (<= x 3.9e+52)) (<= x 4.3e+126)))))
   (- z (* x -3.0))
   (- z (* y -2.0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -2.85e+119) || !((x <= 7.2e-15) || (!(x <= 3.9e+52) && (x <= 4.3e+126)))) {
		tmp = z - (x * -3.0);
	} else {
		tmp = z - (y * -2.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-2.85d+119)) .or. (.not. (x <= 7.2d-15) .or. (.not. (x <= 3.9d+52)) .and. (x <= 4.3d+126))) then
        tmp = z - (x * (-3.0d0))
    else
        tmp = z - (y * (-2.0d0))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -2.85e+119) || !((x <= 7.2e-15) || (!(x <= 3.9e+52) && (x <= 4.3e+126)))) {
		tmp = z - (x * -3.0);
	} else {
		tmp = z - (y * -2.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -2.85e+119) or not ((x <= 7.2e-15) or (not (x <= 3.9e+52) and (x <= 4.3e+126))):
		tmp = z - (x * -3.0)
	else:
		tmp = z - (y * -2.0)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -2.85e+119) || !((x <= 7.2e-15) || (!(x <= 3.9e+52) && (x <= 4.3e+126))))
		tmp = Float64(z - Float64(x * -3.0));
	else
		tmp = Float64(z - Float64(y * -2.0));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -2.85e+119) || ~(((x <= 7.2e-15) || (~((x <= 3.9e+52)) && (x <= 4.3e+126)))))
		tmp = z - (x * -3.0);
	else
		tmp = z - (y * -2.0);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -2.85e+119], N[Not[Or[LessEqual[x, 7.2e-15], And[N[Not[LessEqual[x, 3.9e+52]], $MachinePrecision], LessEqual[x, 4.3e+126]]]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(z - N[(x * -3.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(z - N[(y * -2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -2.8500000000000001e119 or 7.2000000000000002e-15 < x < 3.9e52 or 4.3000000000000002e126 < x

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right)\right)} + x \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + x\right)} \]

      3. remove-double-neg 99.8%

         \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + x\right)\right)\right)} \]

      4. unsub-neg 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z - \left(-\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + x\right)\right)} \]

      5. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto z - \left(-\color{blue}{\left(x + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right)\right)}\right) \]

      6. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto z - \left(-\left(x + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right)\right)}\right)\right) \]

      7. associate-+l+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto z - \left(-\left(x + \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(y + y\right)\right)}\right)\right)\right) \]

      8. associate-+r+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto z - \left(-\left(x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + x\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right)}\right)\right) \]

      9. associate-+r+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto z - \left(-\color{blue}{\left(\left(x + \left(x + x\right)\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right)}\right) \]

      10. distribute-neg-in 99.8%

          \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{\left(\left(-\left(x + \left(x + x\right)\right)\right) + \left(-\left(y + y\right)\right)\right)} \]

      11. distribute-neg-out 99.8%

          \[\leadsto z - \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(-x\right) + \left(-\left(x + x\right)\right)\right)} + \left(-\left(y + y\right)\right)\right) \]

      12. neg-mul-1 99.8%

          \[\leadsto z - \left(\left(\color{blue}{-1 \cdot x} + \left(-\left(x + x\right)\right)\right) + \left(-\left(y + y\right)\right)\right) \]

      13. count-2 99.8%

          \[\leadsto z - \left(\left(-1 \cdot x + \left(-\color{blue}{2 \cdot x}\right)\right) + \left(-\left(y + y\right)\right)\right) \]

      14. distribute-lft-neg-in 99.8%

          \[\leadsto z - \left(\left(-1 \cdot x + \color{blue}{\left(-2\right) \cdot x}\right) + \left(-\left(y + y\right)\right)\right) \]

      15. metadata-eval 99.8%

          \[\leadsto z - \left(\left(-1 \cdot x + \color{blue}{-2} \cdot x\right) + \left(-\left(y + y\right)\right)\right) \]

      16. metadata-eval 99.8%

          \[\leadsto z - \left(\left(-1 \cdot x + \color{blue}{\left(-1 + -1\right)} \cdot x\right) + \left(-\left(y + y\right)\right)\right) \]

      17. distribute-rgt-out 99.8%

          \[\leadsto z - \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(-1 + \left(-1 + -1\right)\right)} + \left(-\left(y + y\right)\right)\right) \]

      18. distribute-neg-out 99.8%

          \[\leadsto z - \left(x \cdot \left(-1 + \left(-1 + -1\right)\right) + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-y\right) + \left(-y\right)\right)}\right) \]

      19. fma-define 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, -1 + \left(-1 + -1\right), \left(-y\right) + \left(-y\right)\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z - \mathsf{fma}\left(x, -3, y \cdot -2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 85.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z - -3 \cdot x} \]

   if -2.8500000000000001e119 < x < 7.2000000000000002e-15 or 3.9e52 < x < 4.3000000000000002e126

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + \left(z + x\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)} + \left(y + x\right)\right) + \left(z + x\right) \]

      4. count-2 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + x\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      5. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      6. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + z\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \left(x + z\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 89.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + 2 \cdot y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. metadata-eval 89.2%

         \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(--2\right)} \cdot y \]

      2. cancel-sign-sub-inv 89.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z - -2 \cdot y} \]

      3. *-commutative 89.2%

         \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{y \cdot -2} \]

   7. Simplified 89.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z - y \cdot -2} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 87.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -2.85 \cdot 10^{+119} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 7.2 \cdot 10^{-15} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 3.9 \cdot 10^{+52}\right) \land x \leq 4.3 \cdot 10^{+126}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z - x \cdot -3\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z - y \cdot -2\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 78.3% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -9 \cdot 10^{+187} \lor \neg \left(y \leq -9 \cdot 10^{+117}\right) \land \left(y \leq -1.25 \cdot 10^{+116} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 2.85 \cdot 10^{+59}\right)\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z - x \cdot -3\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -9e+187)
         (and (not (<= y -9e+117))
              (or (<= y -1.25e+116) (not (<= y 2.85e+59)))))
   (* y 2.0)
   (- z (* x -3.0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -9e+187) || (!(y <= -9e+117) && ((y <= -1.25e+116) || !(y <= 2.85e+59)))) {
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = z - (x * -3.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-9d+187)) .or. (.not. (y <= (-9d+117))) .and. (y <= (-1.25d+116)) .or. (.not. (y <= 2.85d+59))) then
        tmp = y * 2.0d0
    else
        tmp = z - (x * (-3.0d0))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -9e+187) || (!(y <= -9e+117) && ((y <= -1.25e+116) || !(y <= 2.85e+59)))) {
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = z - (x * -3.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -9e+187) or (not (y <= -9e+117) and ((y <= -1.25e+116) or not (y <= 2.85e+59))):
		tmp = y * 2.0
	else:
		tmp = z - (x * -3.0)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -9e+187) || (!(y <= -9e+117) && ((y <= -1.25e+116) || !(y <= 2.85e+59))))
		tmp = Float64(y * 2.0);
	else
		tmp = Float64(z - Float64(x * -3.0));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -9e+187) || (~((y <= -9e+117)) && ((y <= -1.25e+116) || ~((y <= 2.85e+59)))))
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	else
		tmp = z - (x * -3.0);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -9e+187], And[N[Not[LessEqual[y, -9e+117]], $MachinePrecision], Or[LessEqual[y, -1.25e+116], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 2.85e+59]], $MachinePrecision]]]], N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision], N[(z - N[(x * -3.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -9.00000000000000052e187 or -9e117 < y < -1.25000000000000006e116 or 2.8500000000000001e59 < y

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + \left(z + x\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)} + \left(y + x\right)\right) + \left(z + x\right) \]

      4. count-2 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + x\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      5. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      6. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + z\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \left(x + z\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 77.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot y} \]

   if -9.00000000000000052e187 < y < -9e117 or -1.25000000000000006e116 < y < 2.8500000000000001e59

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right)\right)} + x \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + x\right)} \]

      3. remove-double-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + x\right)\right)\right)} \]

      4. unsub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z - \left(-\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + x\right)\right)} \]

      5. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto z - \left(-\color{blue}{\left(x + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right)\right)}\right) \]

      6. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto z - \left(-\left(x + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right)\right)}\right)\right) \]

      7. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto z - \left(-\left(x + \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(y + y\right)\right)}\right)\right)\right) \]

      8. associate-+r+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto z - \left(-\left(x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + x\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right)}\right)\right) \]

      9. associate-+r+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto z - \left(-\color{blue}{\left(\left(x + \left(x + x\right)\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right)}\right) \]

      10. distribute-neg-in 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{\left(\left(-\left(x + \left(x + x\right)\right)\right) + \left(-\left(y + y\right)\right)\right)} \]

      11. distribute-neg-out 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z - \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(-x\right) + \left(-\left(x + x\right)\right)\right)} + \left(-\left(y + y\right)\right)\right) \]

      12. neg-mul-1 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z - \left(\left(\color{blue}{-1 \cdot x} + \left(-\left(x + x\right)\right)\right) + \left(-\left(y + y\right)\right)\right) \]

      13. count-2 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z - \left(\left(-1 \cdot x + \left(-\color{blue}{2 \cdot x}\right)\right) + \left(-\left(y + y\right)\right)\right) \]

      14. distribute-lft-neg-in 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z - \left(\left(-1 \cdot x + \color{blue}{\left(-2\right) \cdot x}\right) + \left(-\left(y + y\right)\right)\right) \]

      15. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z - \left(\left(-1 \cdot x + \color{blue}{-2} \cdot x\right) + \left(-\left(y + y\right)\right)\right) \]

      16. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z - \left(\left(-1 \cdot x + \color{blue}{\left(-1 + -1\right)} \cdot x\right) + \left(-\left(y + y\right)\right)\right) \]

      17. distribute-rgt-out 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z - \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(-1 + \left(-1 + -1\right)\right)} + \left(-\left(y + y\right)\right)\right) \]

      18. distribute-neg-out 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z - \left(x \cdot \left(-1 + \left(-1 + -1\right)\right) + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-y\right) + \left(-y\right)\right)}\right) \]

      19. fma-define 100.0%

          \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, -1 + \left(-1 + -1\right), \left(-y\right) + \left(-y\right)\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z - \mathsf{fma}\left(x, -3, y \cdot -2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 85.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z - -3 \cdot x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 82.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -9 \cdot 10^{+187} \lor \neg \left(y \leq -9 \cdot 10^{+117}\right) \land \left(y \leq -1.25 \cdot 10^{+116} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 2.85 \cdot 10^{+59}\right)\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z - x \cdot -3\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 85.3% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -5.5 \cdot 10^{+62} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 4.4 \cdot 10^{-17}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + 2 \cdot \left(x + y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z - y \cdot -2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -5.5e+62) (not (<= x 4.4e-17)))
   (+ x (* 2.0 (+ x y)))
   (- z (* y -2.0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -5.5e+62) || !(x <= 4.4e-17)) {
		tmp = x + (2.0 * (x + y));
	} else {
		tmp = z - (y * -2.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-5.5d+62)) .or. (.not. (x <= 4.4d-17))) then
        tmp = x + (2.0d0 * (x + y))
    else
        tmp = z - (y * (-2.0d0))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -5.5e+62) || !(x <= 4.4e-17)) {
		tmp = x + (2.0 * (x + y));
	} else {
		tmp = z - (y * -2.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -5.5e+62) or not (x <= 4.4e-17):
		tmp = x + (2.0 * (x + y))
	else:
		tmp = z - (y * -2.0)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -5.5e+62) || !(x <= 4.4e-17))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(2.0 * Float64(x + y)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(z - Float64(y * -2.0));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -5.5e+62) || ~((x <= 4.4e-17)))
		tmp = x + (2.0 * (x + y));
	else
		tmp = z - (y * -2.0);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -5.5e+62], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 4.4e-17]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(2.0 * N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(z - N[(y * -2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -5.4999999999999997e62 or 4.4e-17 < x

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + \left(z + x\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)} + \left(y + x\right)\right) + \left(z + x\right) \]

      4. count-2 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + x\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      5. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      6. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + z\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \left(x + z\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 87.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + 2 \cdot \left(x + y\right)} \]

   if -5.4999999999999997e62 < x < 4.4e-17

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + \left(z + x\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)} + \left(y + x\right)\right) + \left(z + x\right) \]

      4. count-2 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + x\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      5. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      6. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + z\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \left(x + z\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 93.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + 2 \cdot y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. metadata-eval 93.5%

         \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(--2\right)} \cdot y \]

      2. cancel-sign-sub-inv 93.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z - -2 \cdot y} \]

      3. *-commutative 93.5%

         \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{y \cdot -2} \]

   7. Simplified 93.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z - y \cdot -2} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 90.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -5.5 \cdot 10^{+62} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 4.4 \cdot 10^{-17}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + 2 \cdot \left(x + y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z - y \cdot -2\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 51.0% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -2.8 \cdot 10^{-16} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 5 \cdot 10^{-75}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -2.8e-16) (not (<= y 5e-75))) (* y 2.0) z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -2.8e-16) || !(y <= 5e-75)) {
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-2.8d-16)) .or. (.not. (y <= 5d-75))) then
        tmp = y * 2.0d0
    else
        tmp = z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -2.8e-16) || !(y <= 5e-75)) {
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -2.8e-16) or not (y <= 5e-75):
		tmp = y * 2.0
	else:
		tmp = z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -2.8e-16) || !(y <= 5e-75))
		tmp = Float64(y * 2.0);
	else
		tmp = z;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -2.8e-16) || ~((y <= 5e-75)))
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	else
		tmp = z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -2.8e-16], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 5e-75]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision], z]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -2.8000000000000001e-16 or 4.99999999999999979e-75 < y

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + \left(z + x\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)} + \left(y + x\right)\right) + \left(z + x\right) \]

      4. count-2 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + x\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      5. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      6. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + z\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \left(x + z\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 58.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot y} \]

   if -2.8000000000000001e-16 < y < 4.99999999999999979e-75

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + \left(z + x\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)} + \left(y + x\right)\right) + \left(z + x\right) \]

      4. count-2 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + x\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      5. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      6. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + z\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \left(x + z\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 50.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 54.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -2.8 \cdot 10^{-16} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 5 \cdot 10^{-75}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 99.9% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \left(z + x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* 2.0 (+ x y)) (+ z x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (2.0 * (x + y)) + (z + x);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (2.0d0 * (x + y)) + (z + x)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (2.0 * (x + y)) + (z + x);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (2.0 * (x + y)) + (z + x)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(2.0 * Float64(x + y)) + Float64(z + x))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (2.0 * (x + y)) + (z + x);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(2.0 * N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-+l+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + \left(z + x\right)} \]

   2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

   3. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)} + \left(y + x\right)\right) + \left(z + x\right) \]

   4. count-2 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + x\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

   5. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

   6. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + z\right)} \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \left(x + z\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \left(z + x\right) \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 34.6% accurate, 11.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 z)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = z
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return z

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return z
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = z;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := z

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-+l+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + \left(z + x\right)} \]

   2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

   3. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)} + \left(y + x\right)\right) + \left(z + x\right) \]

   4. count-2 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + x\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

   5. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

   6. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + z\right)} \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \left(x + z\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 32.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024107 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Graphics.Rendering.Plot.Render.Plot.Legend:renderLegendInside from plot-0.2.3.4"
  :precision binary64
  (+ (+ (+ (+ (+ x y) y) x) z) x))