Optimisation.CirclePacking:place from circle-packing-0.1.0.4, G

Percentage Accurate: 100.0% → 100.0%

Time: 3.6s

Alternatives: 7

Speedup: 1.0×

• 21.1% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(z + 1\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* (+ x y) (+ z 1.0)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x + y) * (z + 1.0);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x + y) * (z + 1.0d0)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x + y) * (z + 1.0);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x + y) * (z + 1.0)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x + y) * Float64(z + 1.0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x + y) * (z + 1.0);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] * N[(z + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(z + 1\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* (+ x y) (+ z 1.0)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x + y) * (z + 1.0);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x + y) * (z + 1.0d0)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x + y) * (z + 1.0);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x + y) * (z + 1.0)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x + y) * Float64(z + 1.0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x + y) * (z + 1.0);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] * N[(z + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(z + 1\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* (+ x y) (+ z 1.0)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x + y) * (z + 1.0);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x + y) * (z + 1.0d0)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x + y) * (z + 1.0);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x + y) * (z + 1.0)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x + y) * Float64(z + 1.0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x + y) * (z + 1.0);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] * N[(z + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(z + 1\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 60.9% accurate, 0.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -2.4 \cdot 10^{-123} \lor \neg \left(x \leq -1.55 \cdot 10^{-180}\right) \land x \leq -1.6 \cdot 10^{-186}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(z + 1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(z + 1\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -2.4e-123) (and (not (<= x -1.55e-180)) (<= x -1.6e-186)))
   (* x (+ z 1.0))
   (* y (+ z 1.0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -2.4e-123) || (!(x <= -1.55e-180) && (x <= -1.6e-186))) {
		tmp = x * (z + 1.0);
	} else {
		tmp = y * (z + 1.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-2.4d-123)) .or. (.not. (x <= (-1.55d-180))) .and. (x <= (-1.6d-186))) then
        tmp = x * (z + 1.0d0)
    else
        tmp = y * (z + 1.0d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -2.4e-123) || (!(x <= -1.55e-180) && (x <= -1.6e-186))) {
		tmp = x * (z + 1.0);
	} else {
		tmp = y * (z + 1.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -2.4e-123) or (not (x <= -1.55e-180) and (x <= -1.6e-186)):
		tmp = x * (z + 1.0)
	else:
		tmp = y * (z + 1.0)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -2.4e-123) || (!(x <= -1.55e-180) && (x <= -1.6e-186)))
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(z + 1.0));
	else
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(z + 1.0));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -2.4e-123) || (~((x <= -1.55e-180)) && (x <= -1.6e-186)))
		tmp = x * (z + 1.0);
	else
		tmp = y * (z + 1.0);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -2.4e-123], And[N[Not[LessEqual[x, -1.55e-180]], $MachinePrecision], LessEqual[x, -1.6e-186]]], N[(x * N[(z + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(y * N[(z + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -2.4e-123 or -1.5499999999999999e-180 < x < -1.6e-186

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(z + 1\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 62.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + z\right)} \]

   if -2.4e-123 < x < -1.5499999999999999e-180 or -1.6e-186 < x

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(z + 1\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 60.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(1 + z\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 61.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -2.4 \cdot 10^{-123} \lor \neg \left(x \leq -1.55 \cdot 10^{-180}\right) \land x \leq -1.6 \cdot 10^{-186}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(z + 1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(z + 1\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 96.9% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -7.3 \cdot 10^{+15} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 2.35 \cdot 10^{-10}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(x + y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -7.3e+15) (not (<= z 2.35e-10))) (* z (+ x y)) (+ x y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -7.3e+15) || !(z <= 2.35e-10)) {
		tmp = z * (x + y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-7.3d+15)) .or. (.not. (z <= 2.35d-10))) then
        tmp = z * (x + y)
    else
        tmp = x + y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -7.3e+15) || !(z <= 2.35e-10)) {
		tmp = z * (x + y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -7.3e+15) or not (z <= 2.35e-10):
		tmp = z * (x + y)
	else:
		tmp = x + y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -7.3e+15) || !(z <= 2.35e-10))
		tmp = Float64(z * Float64(x + y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -7.3e+15) || ~((z <= 2.35e-10)))
		tmp = z * (x + y);
	else
		tmp = x + y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -7.3e+15], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 2.35e-10]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(z * N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -7.3e15 or 2.3500000000000002e-10 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(z + 1\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 96.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(x + y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 96.6%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 96.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)} \]

   if -7.3e15 < z < 2.3500000000000002e-10

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(z + 1\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 94.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 94.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]

   5. Simplified 94.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 95.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -7.3 \cdot 10^{+15} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 2.35 \cdot 10^{-10}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(x + y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 74.0% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -7.3 \cdot 10^{+15} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1.45 \cdot 10^{-42}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(z + 1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -7.3e+15) (not (<= z 1.45e-42))) (* x (+ z 1.0)) (+ x y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -7.3e+15) || !(z <= 1.45e-42)) {
		tmp = x * (z + 1.0);
	} else {
		tmp = x + y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-7.3d+15)) .or. (.not. (z <= 1.45d-42))) then
        tmp = x * (z + 1.0d0)
    else
        tmp = x + y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -7.3e+15) || !(z <= 1.45e-42)) {
		tmp = x * (z + 1.0);
	} else {
		tmp = x + y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -7.3e+15) or not (z <= 1.45e-42):
		tmp = x * (z + 1.0)
	else:
		tmp = x + y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -7.3e+15) || !(z <= 1.45e-42))
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(z + 1.0));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -7.3e+15) || ~((z <= 1.45e-42)))
		tmp = x * (z + 1.0);
	else
		tmp = x + y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -7.3e+15], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 1.45e-42]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[(z + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -7.3e15 or 1.4500000000000001e-42 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(z + 1\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 48.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + z\right)} \]

   if -7.3e15 < z < 1.4500000000000001e-42

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(z + 1\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 94.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 94.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]

   5. Simplified 94.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 70.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -7.3 \cdot 10^{+15} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1.45 \cdot 10^{-42}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(z + 1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 30.2% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 1.9 \cdot 10^{-181}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (if (<= y 1.9e-181) x y))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 1.9e-181) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 1.9d-181) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 1.9e-181) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 1.9e-181:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 1.9e-181)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = y;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 1.9e-181)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, 1.9e-181], x, y]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 1.8999999999999999e-181

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(z + 1\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 55.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 27.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if 1.8999999999999999e-181 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(z + 1\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 66.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(1 + z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 37.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 50.5% accurate, 2.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x y))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + y;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + y
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + y;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + y

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + y)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + y;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(z + 1\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 49.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 49.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]

5. Simplified 49.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]

6. Final simplification 49.0%

   \[\leadsto x + y \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 26.4% accurate, 7.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(z + 1\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 48.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + z\right)} \]

4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 23.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024107 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Optimisation.CirclePacking:place from circle-packing-0.1.0.4, G"
  :precision binary64
  (* (+ x y) (+ z 1.0)))