Numeric.SpecFunctions:logGamma from math-functions-0.1.5.2, B

Percentage Accurate: 68.8% → 99.6%

Time: 18.4s

Alternatives: 14

Speedup: 4.2×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (+
  x
  (/
   (*
    y
    (+
     (* (+ (* z 0.0692910599291889) 0.4917317610505968) z)
     0.279195317918525))
   (+ (* (+ z 6.012459259764103) z) 3.350343815022304))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889d0) + 0.4917317610505968d0) * z) + 0.279195317918525d0)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103d0) * z) + 3.350343815022304d0))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / Float64(Float64(Float64(z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(N[(y * N[(N[(N[(N[(z * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision] + 0.4917317610505968), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] + 0.279195317918525), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(N[(z + 6.012459259764103), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] + 3.350343815022304), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 68.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (+
  x
  (/
   (*
    y
    (+
     (* (+ (* z 0.0692910599291889) 0.4917317610505968) z)
     0.279195317918525))
   (+ (* (+ z 6.012459259764103) z) 3.350343815022304))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889d0) + 0.4917317610505968d0) * z) + 0.279195317918525d0)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103d0) * z) + 3.350343815022304d0))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / Float64(Float64(Float64(z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(N[(y * N[(N[(N[(N[(z * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision] + 0.4917317610505968), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] + 0.279195317918525), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(N[(z + 6.012459259764103), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] + 3.350343815022304), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.6% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) + 0.279195317918525\right)}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304} \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+302}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(0.0692910599291889, y, x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<=
      (/
       (*
        y
        (+
         (* z (+ (* z 0.0692910599291889) 0.4917317610505968))
         0.279195317918525))
       (+ (* z (+ z 6.012459259764103)) 3.350343815022304))
      5e+302)
   (+
    x
    (*
     y
     (/
      (fma (fma z 0.0692910599291889 0.4917317610505968) z 0.279195317918525)
      (fma (+ z 6.012459259764103) z 3.350343815022304))))
   (fma 0.0692910599291889 y x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (((y * ((z * ((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / ((z * (z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304)) <= 5e+302) {
		tmp = x + (y * (fma(fma(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968), z, 0.279195317918525) / fma((z + 6.012459259764103), z, 3.350343815022304)));
	} else {
		tmp = fma(0.0692910599291889, y, x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(Float64(y * Float64(Float64(z * Float64(Float64(z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / Float64(Float64(z * Float64(z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304)) <= 5e+302)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(fma(fma(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968), z, 0.279195317918525) / fma(Float64(z + 6.012459259764103), z, 3.350343815022304))));
	else
		tmp = fma(0.0692910599291889, y, x);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[N[(N[(y * N[(N[(z * N[(N[(z * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision] + 0.4917317610505968), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + 0.279195317918525), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(z * N[(z + 6.012459259764103), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + 3.350343815022304), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 5e+302], N[(x + N[(y * N[(N[(N[(z * 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968), $MachinePrecision] * z + 0.279195317918525), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(z + 6.012459259764103), $MachinePrecision] * z + 3.350343815022304), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(0.0692910599291889 * y + x), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (/.f64 (*.f64 y (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 z #s(literal 692910599291889/10000000000000000 binary64)) #s(literal 307332350656623/625000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 11167812716741/40000000000000 binary64))) (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 z #s(literal 6012459259764103/1000000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 104698244219447/31250000000000 binary64))) < 5e302

   1. Initial program 92.2%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. remove-double-neg 92.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{-\left(-y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      2. distribute-lft-neg-out 92.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{-\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      3. distribute-neg-frac 92.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)} \]

      4. associate-/l* 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}}\right) \]

      5. distribute-rgt-neg-in 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)} \]

      6. distribute-lft-neg-in 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      7. distribute-rgt-neg-in 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      8. remove-double-neg 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} \]

   3. Simplified 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   if 5e302 < (/.f64 (*.f64 y (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 z #s(literal 692910599291889/10000000000000000 binary64)) #s(literal 307332350656623/625000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 11167812716741/40000000000000 binary64))) (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 z #s(literal 6012459259764103/1000000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 104698244219447/31250000000000 binary64)))

   1. Initial program 2.2%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 2.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]

      2. associate-/l* 13.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]

      3. fma-define 13.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]

      4. remove-double-neg 13.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{-\left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)}, x\right) \]

      5. remove-double-neg 13.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}}, x\right) \]

      6. *-commutative 13.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      7. fma-define 13.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      8. fma-define 13.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      9. *-commutative 13.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      10. fma-define 13.3%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]

   3. Simplified 13.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 98.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 98.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot y + x} \]

      2. fma-define 98.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(0.0692910599291889, y, x\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 98.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(0.0692910599291889, y, x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) + 0.279195317918525\right)}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304} \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+302}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(0.0692910599291889, y, x\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 97.5% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304\\ t_1 := z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\\ \mathbf{if}\;\frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot t\_1 + 0.279195317918525\right)}{t\_0} \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+272}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, t\_1, 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{t\_0}, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(0.0692910599291889, y, x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (+ (* z (+ z 6.012459259764103)) 3.350343815022304))
        (t_1 (+ (* z 0.0692910599291889) 0.4917317610505968)))
   (if (<= (/ (* y (+ (* z t_1) 0.279195317918525)) t_0) 2e+272)
     (fma (fma z t_1 0.279195317918525) (/ y t_0) x)
     (fma 0.0692910599291889 y x))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = (z * (z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304;
	double t_1 = (z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968;
	double tmp;
	if (((y * ((z * t_1) + 0.279195317918525)) / t_0) <= 2e+272) {
		tmp = fma(fma(z, t_1, 0.279195317918525), (y / t_0), x);
	} else {
		tmp = fma(0.0692910599291889, y, x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(z * Float64(z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(Float64(y * Float64(Float64(z * t_1) + 0.279195317918525)) / t_0) <= 2e+272)
		tmp = fma(fma(z, t_1, 0.279195317918525), Float64(y / t_0), x);
	else
		tmp = fma(0.0692910599291889, y, x);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(z * N[(z + 6.012459259764103), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + 3.350343815022304), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(z * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision] + 0.4917317610505968), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(N[(y * N[(N[(z * t$95$1), $MachinePrecision] + 0.279195317918525), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / t$95$0), $MachinePrecision], 2e+272], N[(N[(z * t$95$1 + 0.279195317918525), $MachinePrecision] * N[(y / t$95$0), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision], N[(0.0692910599291889 * y + x), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (/.f64 (*.f64 y (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 z #s(literal 692910599291889/10000000000000000 binary64)) #s(literal 307332350656623/625000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 11167812716741/40000000000000 binary64))) (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 z #s(literal 6012459259764103/1000000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 104698244219447/31250000000000 binary64))) < 2.0000000000000001e272

   1. Initial program 92.2%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 92.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]

      2. *-commutative 92.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right) \cdot y}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x \]

      3. associate-/l* 98.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right) \cdot \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]

      4. fma-define 98.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525, \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]

      5. *-commutative 98.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525, \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      6. fma-define 98.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}, \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      7. fma-define 98.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      8. *-commutative 98.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      9. fma-define 98.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]

   3. Simplified 98.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 98.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968}, 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right) \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 98.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968}, 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right) \]

   7. Taylor expanded in y around 0 98.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right), \color{blue}{\frac{y}{3.350343815022304 + z \cdot \left(6.012459259764103 + z\right)}}, x\right) \]

   if 2.0000000000000001e272 < (/.f64 (*.f64 y (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 z #s(literal 692910599291889/10000000000000000 binary64)) #s(literal 307332350656623/625000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 11167812716741/40000000000000 binary64))) (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 z #s(literal 6012459259764103/1000000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 104698244219447/31250000000000 binary64)))

   1. Initial program 5.0%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 5.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]

      2. associate-/l* 15.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]

      3. fma-define 15.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]

      4. remove-double-neg 15.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{-\left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)}, x\right) \]

      5. remove-double-neg 15.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}}, x\right) \]

      6. *-commutative 15.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      7. fma-define 15.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      8. fma-define 15.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      9. *-commutative 15.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      10. fma-define 15.9%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]

   3. Simplified 15.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 96.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 96.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot y + x} \]

      2. fma-define 96.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(0.0692910599291889, y, x\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 96.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(0.0692910599291889, y, x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 97.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) + 0.279195317918525\right)}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304} \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+272}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(0.0692910599291889, y, x\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 99.5% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304\\ t_1 := \frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) + 0.279195317918525\right)}{t\_0}\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_1 \leq -\infty:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t\_1 \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+302}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(0.0692910599291889, z, 0.4917317610505968\right)\right) + y \cdot 0.279195317918525}{t\_0}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(0.0692910599291889, y, x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (+ (* z (+ z 6.012459259764103)) 3.350343815022304))
        (t_1
         (/
          (*
           y
           (+
            (* z (+ (* z 0.0692910599291889) 0.4917317610505968))
            0.279195317918525))
          t_0)))
   (if (<= t_1 (- INFINITY))
     (+ x (* y 0.0692910599291889))
     (if (<= t_1 5e+302)
       (+
        x
        (/
         (+
          (* y (* z (fma 0.0692910599291889 z 0.4917317610505968)))
          (* y 0.279195317918525))
         t_0))
       (fma 0.0692910599291889 y x)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = (z * (z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304;
	double t_1 = (y * ((z * ((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / t_0;
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= -((double) INFINITY)) {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	} else if (t_1 <= 5e+302) {
		tmp = x + (((y * (z * fma(0.0692910599291889, z, 0.4917317610505968))) + (y * 0.279195317918525)) / t_0);
	} else {
		tmp = fma(0.0692910599291889, y, x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(z * Float64(z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(y * Float64(Float64(z * Float64(Float64(z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / t_0)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_1 <= Float64(-Inf))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * 0.0692910599291889));
	elseif (t_1 <= 5e+302)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(Float64(y * Float64(z * fma(0.0692910599291889, z, 0.4917317610505968))) + Float64(y * 0.279195317918525)) / t_0));
	else
		tmp = fma(0.0692910599291889, y, x);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(z * N[(z + 6.012459259764103), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + 3.350343815022304), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(y * N[(N[(z * N[(N[(z * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision] + 0.4917317610505968), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + 0.279195317918525), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / t$95$0), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$1, (-Infinity)], N[(x + N[(y * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[t$95$1, 5e+302], N[(x + N[(N[(N[(y * N[(z * N[(0.0692910599291889 * z + 0.4917317610505968), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * 0.279195317918525), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / t$95$0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(0.0692910599291889 * y + x), $MachinePrecision]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (/.f64 (*.f64 y (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 z #s(literal 692910599291889/10000000000000000 binary64)) #s(literal 307332350656623/625000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 11167812716741/40000000000000 binary64))) (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 z #s(literal 6012459259764103/1000000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 104698244219447/31250000000000 binary64))) < -inf.0

   1. Initial program 6.8%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 6.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]

      2. associate-/l* 99.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]

      3. fma-define 99.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]

      4. remove-double-neg 99.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{-\left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)}, x\right) \]

      5. remove-double-neg 99.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}}, x\right) \]

      6. *-commutative 99.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      7. fma-define 99.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      8. fma-define 99.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      9. *-commutative 99.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      10. fma-define 99.1%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot y + x} \]

   7. Simplified 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot y + x} \]

   if -inf.0 < (/.f64 (*.f64 y (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 z #s(literal 692910599291889/10000000000000000 binary64)) #s(literal 307332350656623/625000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 11167812716741/40000000000000 binary64))) (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 z #s(literal 6012459259764103/1000000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 104698244219447/31250000000000 binary64))) < 5e302

   1. Initial program 99.6%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. expm1-log1p-u 83.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889\right)\right)} + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      2. expm1-undefine 83.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(\color{blue}{\left(e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889\right)} - 1\right)} + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 83.5%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(\color{blue}{\left(e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889\right)} - 1\right)} + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. expm1-define 83.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889\right)\right)} + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

   6. Simplified 83.5%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889\right)\right)} + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-rgt-in 83.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{\left(\left(\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889\right)\right) + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot y + 0.279195317918525 \cdot y}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      2. *-commutative 83.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot \left(\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889\right)\right) + 0.4917317610505968\right)\right)} \cdot y + 0.279195317918525 \cdot y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      3. expm1-log1p-u 99.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\left(z \cdot \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot 0.0692910599291889} + 0.4917317610505968\right)\right) \cdot y + 0.279195317918525 \cdot y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      4. *-commutative 99.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\left(z \cdot \left(\color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot z} + 0.4917317610505968\right)\right) \cdot y + 0.279195317918525 \cdot y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      5. fma-define 99.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\left(z \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(0.0692910599291889, z, 0.4917317610505968\right)}\right) \cdot y + 0.279195317918525 \cdot y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

   8. Applied egg-rr 99.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(0.0692910599291889, z, 0.4917317610505968\right)\right) \cdot y + 0.279195317918525 \cdot y}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

   if 5e302 < (/.f64 (*.f64 y (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 z #s(literal 692910599291889/10000000000000000 binary64)) #s(literal 307332350656623/625000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 11167812716741/40000000000000 binary64))) (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 z #s(literal 6012459259764103/1000000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 104698244219447/31250000000000 binary64)))

   1. Initial program 2.2%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 2.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]

      2. associate-/l* 13.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]

      3. fma-define 13.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]

      4. remove-double-neg 13.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{-\left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)}, x\right) \]

      5. remove-double-neg 13.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}}, x\right) \]

      6. *-commutative 13.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      7. fma-define 13.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      8. fma-define 13.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      9. *-commutative 13.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      10. fma-define 13.3%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]

   3. Simplified 13.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 98.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 98.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot y + x} \]

      2. fma-define 98.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(0.0692910599291889, y, x\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 98.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(0.0692910599291889, y, x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) + 0.279195317918525\right)}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304} \leq -\infty:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) + 0.279195317918525\right)}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304} \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+302}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(0.0692910599291889, z, 0.4917317610505968\right)\right) + y \cdot 0.279195317918525}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(0.0692910599291889, y, x\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 99.5% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) + 0.279195317918525\right)}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304}\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_0 \leq -\infty:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t\_0 \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+302}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0 + x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(0.0692910599291889, y, x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0
         (/
          (*
           y
           (+
            (* z (+ (* z 0.0692910599291889) 0.4917317610505968))
            0.279195317918525))
          (+ (* z (+ z 6.012459259764103)) 3.350343815022304))))
   (if (<= t_0 (- INFINITY))
     (+ x (* y 0.0692910599291889))
     (if (<= t_0 5e+302) (+ t_0 x) (fma 0.0692910599291889 y x)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = (y * ((z * ((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / ((z * (z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304);
	double tmp;
	if (t_0 <= -((double) INFINITY)) {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	} else if (t_0 <= 5e+302) {
		tmp = t_0 + x;
	} else {
		tmp = fma(0.0692910599291889, y, x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(y * Float64(Float64(z * Float64(Float64(z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / Float64(Float64(z * Float64(z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_0 <= Float64(-Inf))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * 0.0692910599291889));
	elseif (t_0 <= 5e+302)
		tmp = Float64(t_0 + x);
	else
		tmp = fma(0.0692910599291889, y, x);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(y * N[(N[(z * N[(N[(z * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision] + 0.4917317610505968), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + 0.279195317918525), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(z * N[(z + 6.012459259764103), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + 3.350343815022304), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$0, (-Infinity)], N[(x + N[(y * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[t$95$0, 5e+302], N[(t$95$0 + x), $MachinePrecision], N[(0.0692910599291889 * y + x), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (/.f64 (*.f64 y (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 z #s(literal 692910599291889/10000000000000000 binary64)) #s(literal 307332350656623/625000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 11167812716741/40000000000000 binary64))) (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 z #s(literal 6012459259764103/1000000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 104698244219447/31250000000000 binary64))) < -inf.0

   1. Initial program 6.8%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 6.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]

      2. associate-/l* 99.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]

      3. fma-define 99.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]

      4. remove-double-neg 99.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{-\left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)}, x\right) \]

      5. remove-double-neg 99.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}}, x\right) \]

      6. *-commutative 99.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      7. fma-define 99.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      8. fma-define 99.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      9. *-commutative 99.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      10. fma-define 99.1%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot y + x} \]

   7. Simplified 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot y + x} \]

   if -inf.0 < (/.f64 (*.f64 y (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 z #s(literal 692910599291889/10000000000000000 binary64)) #s(literal 307332350656623/625000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 11167812716741/40000000000000 binary64))) (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 z #s(literal 6012459259764103/1000000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 104698244219447/31250000000000 binary64))) < 5e302

   1. Initial program 99.6%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   if 5e302 < (/.f64 (*.f64 y (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 z #s(literal 692910599291889/10000000000000000 binary64)) #s(literal 307332350656623/625000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 11167812716741/40000000000000 binary64))) (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 z #s(literal 6012459259764103/1000000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 104698244219447/31250000000000 binary64)))

   1. Initial program 2.2%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 2.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]

      2. associate-/l* 13.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]

      3. fma-define 13.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]

      4. remove-double-neg 13.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{-\left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)}, x\right) \]

      5. remove-double-neg 13.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}}, x\right) \]

      6. *-commutative 13.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      7. fma-define 13.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      8. fma-define 13.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      9. *-commutative 13.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      10. fma-define 13.3%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]

   3. Simplified 13.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 98.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 98.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot y + x} \]

      2. fma-define 98.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(0.0692910599291889, y, x\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 98.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(0.0692910599291889, y, x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) + 0.279195317918525\right)}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304} \leq -\infty:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) + 0.279195317918525\right)}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304} \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+302}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) + 0.279195317918525\right)}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304} + x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(0.0692910599291889, y, x\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 99.5% accurate, 0.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) + 0.279195317918525\right)}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304}\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_0 \leq -\infty \lor \neg \left(t\_0 \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+302}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0 + x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0
         (/
          (*
           y
           (+
            (* z (+ (* z 0.0692910599291889) 0.4917317610505968))
            0.279195317918525))
          (+ (* z (+ z 6.012459259764103)) 3.350343815022304))))
   (if (or (<= t_0 (- INFINITY)) (not (<= t_0 5e+302)))
     (+ x (* y 0.0692910599291889))
     (+ t_0 x))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = (y * ((z * ((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / ((z * (z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304);
	double tmp;
	if ((t_0 <= -((double) INFINITY)) || !(t_0 <= 5e+302)) {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	} else {
		tmp = t_0 + x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = (y * ((z * ((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / ((z * (z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304);
	double tmp;
	if ((t_0 <= -Double.POSITIVE_INFINITY) || !(t_0 <= 5e+302)) {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	} else {
		tmp = t_0 + x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	t_0 = (y * ((z * ((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / ((z * (z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304)
	tmp = 0
	if (t_0 <= -math.inf) or not (t_0 <= 5e+302):
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889)
	else:
		tmp = t_0 + x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(y * Float64(Float64(z * Float64(Float64(z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / Float64(Float64(z * Float64(z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304))
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((t_0 <= Float64(-Inf)) || !(t_0 <= 5e+302))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * 0.0692910599291889));
	else
		tmp = Float64(t_0 + x);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = (y * ((z * ((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / ((z * (z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((t_0 <= -Inf) || ~((t_0 <= 5e+302)))
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	else
		tmp = t_0 + x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(y * N[(N[(z * N[(N[(z * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision] + 0.4917317610505968), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + 0.279195317918525), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(z * N[(z + 6.012459259764103), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + 3.350343815022304), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[Or[LessEqual[t$95$0, (-Infinity)], N[Not[LessEqual[t$95$0, 5e+302]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(y * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(t$95$0 + x), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (/.f64 (*.f64 y (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 z #s(literal 692910599291889/10000000000000000 binary64)) #s(literal 307332350656623/625000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 11167812716741/40000000000000 binary64))) (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 z #s(literal 6012459259764103/1000000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 104698244219447/31250000000000 binary64))) < -inf.0 or 5e302 < (/.f64 (*.f64 y (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 z #s(literal 692910599291889/10000000000000000 binary64)) #s(literal 307332350656623/625000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 11167812716741/40000000000000 binary64))) (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 z #s(literal 6012459259764103/1000000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 104698244219447/31250000000000 binary64)))

   1. Initial program 3.0%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 3.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]

      2. associate-/l* 29.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]

      3. fma-define 29.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]

      4. remove-double-neg 29.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{-\left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)}, x\right) \]

      5. remove-double-neg 29.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}}, x\right) \]

      6. *-commutative 29.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      7. fma-define 29.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      8. fma-define 29.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      9. *-commutative 29.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      10. fma-define 29.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]

   3. Simplified 29.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 98.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 98.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot y + x} \]

   7. Simplified 98.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot y + x} \]

   if -inf.0 < (/.f64 (*.f64 y (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 z #s(literal 692910599291889/10000000000000000 binary64)) #s(literal 307332350656623/625000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 11167812716741/40000000000000 binary64))) (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 z #s(literal 6012459259764103/1000000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 104698244219447/31250000000000 binary64))) < 5e302

   1. Initial program 99.6%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) + 0.279195317918525\right)}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304} \leq -\infty \lor \neg \left(\frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) + 0.279195317918525\right)}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304} \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+302}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) + 0.279195317918525\right)}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304} + x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 61.5% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.95 \cdot 10^{-45}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -6.4 \cdot 10^{-118}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 0.08333333333333323\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -2.5 \cdot 10^{-118}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -1.9 \cdot 10^{-201}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 0.08333333333333323\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 4 \cdot 10^{-158}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -1.95e-45)
   x
   (if (<= x -6.4e-118)
     (* y 0.08333333333333323)
     (if (<= x -2.5e-118)
       x
       (if (<= x -1.9e-201)
         (* y 0.08333333333333323)
         (if (<= x 4e-158) (* y 0.0692910599291889) x))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1.95e-45) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (x <= -6.4e-118) {
		tmp = y * 0.08333333333333323;
	} else if (x <= -2.5e-118) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (x <= -1.9e-201) {
		tmp = y * 0.08333333333333323;
	} else if (x <= 4e-158) {
		tmp = y * 0.0692910599291889;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-1.95d-45)) then
        tmp = x
    else if (x <= (-6.4d-118)) then
        tmp = y * 0.08333333333333323d0
    else if (x <= (-2.5d-118)) then
        tmp = x
    else if (x <= (-1.9d-201)) then
        tmp = y * 0.08333333333333323d0
    else if (x <= 4d-158) then
        tmp = y * 0.0692910599291889d0
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1.95e-45) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (x <= -6.4e-118) {
		tmp = y * 0.08333333333333323;
	} else if (x <= -2.5e-118) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (x <= -1.9e-201) {
		tmp = y * 0.08333333333333323;
	} else if (x <= 4e-158) {
		tmp = y * 0.0692910599291889;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -1.95e-45:
		tmp = x
	elif x <= -6.4e-118:
		tmp = y * 0.08333333333333323
	elif x <= -2.5e-118:
		tmp = x
	elif x <= -1.9e-201:
		tmp = y * 0.08333333333333323
	elif x <= 4e-158:
		tmp = y * 0.0692910599291889
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -1.95e-45)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (x <= -6.4e-118)
		tmp = Float64(y * 0.08333333333333323);
	elseif (x <= -2.5e-118)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (x <= -1.9e-201)
		tmp = Float64(y * 0.08333333333333323);
	elseif (x <= 4e-158)
		tmp = Float64(y * 0.0692910599291889);
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -1.95e-45)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (x <= -6.4e-118)
		tmp = y * 0.08333333333333323;
	elseif (x <= -2.5e-118)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (x <= -1.9e-201)
		tmp = y * 0.08333333333333323;
	elseif (x <= 4e-158)
		tmp = y * 0.0692910599291889;
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[x, -1.95e-45], x, If[LessEqual[x, -6.4e-118], N[(y * 0.08333333333333323), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[x, -2.5e-118], x, If[LessEqual[x, -1.9e-201], N[(y * 0.08333333333333323), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[x, 4e-158], N[(y * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision], x]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if x < -1.95e-45 or -6.40000000000000008e-118 < x < -2.50000000000000007e-118 or 4.00000000000000026e-158 < x

   1. Initial program 73.8%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 73.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]

      2. associate-/l* 80.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]

      3. fma-define 80.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]

      4. remove-double-neg 80.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{-\left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)}, x\right) \]

      5. remove-double-neg 80.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}}, x\right) \]

      6. *-commutative 80.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      7. fma-define 80.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      8. fma-define 80.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      9. *-commutative 80.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      10. fma-define 80.7%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]

   3. Simplified 80.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 64.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if -1.95e-45 < x < -6.40000000000000008e-118 or -2.50000000000000007e-118 < x < -1.9e-201

   1. Initial program 74.3%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 74.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]

      2. associate-/l* 74.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]

      3. fma-define 74.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]

      4. remove-double-neg 74.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{-\left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)}, x\right) \]

      5. remove-double-neg 74.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}}, x\right) \]

      6. *-commutative 74.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      7. fma-define 74.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      8. fma-define 74.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      9. *-commutative 74.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      10. fma-define 74.8%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]

   3. Simplified 74.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 67.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + \frac{y \cdot \left(0.279195317918525 + z \cdot \left(0.4917317610505968 + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot z\right)\right)}{x \cdot \left(3.350343815022304 + z \cdot \left(6.012459259764103 + z\right)\right)}\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around 0 57.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(0.279195317918525 + z \cdot \left(0.4917317610505968 + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot z\right)\right)}{3.350343815022304 + z \cdot \left(6.012459259764103 + z\right)}} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in z around 0 48.3%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{0.279195317918525 \cdot y}}{3.350343815022304 + z \cdot \left(6.012459259764103 + z\right)} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 48.3%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{y \cdot 0.279195317918525}}{3.350343815022304 + z \cdot \left(6.012459259764103 + z\right)} \]

   9. Simplified 48.3%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{y \cdot 0.279195317918525}}{3.350343815022304 + z \cdot \left(6.012459259764103 + z\right)} \]

   10. Taylor expanded in z around 0 54.7%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.08333333333333323 \cdot y} \]
   11. Step-by-step derivation

       1. *-commutative 54.7%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.08333333333333323} \]

   12. Simplified 54.7%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.08333333333333323} \]

   if -1.9e-201 < x < 4.00000000000000026e-158

   1. Initial program 49.7%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 49.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]

      2. *-commutative 49.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right) \cdot y}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x \]

      3. associate-/l* 63.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right) \cdot \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]

      4. fma-define 63.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525, \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]

      5. *-commutative 63.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525, \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      6. fma-define 63.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}, \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      7. fma-define 63.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      8. *-commutative 63.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      9. fma-define 63.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]

   3. Simplified 63.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. clear-num 63.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}{y}}}, x\right) \]

      2. inv-pow 63.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \color{blue}{{\left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}{y}\right)}^{-1}}, x\right) \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 63.3%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \color{blue}{{\left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}{y}\right)}^{-1}}, x\right) \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow-1 63.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}{y}}}, x\right) \]

   8. Simplified 63.3%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}{y}}}, x\right) \]

   9. Taylor expanded in z around inf 73.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

       1. +-commutative 73.7%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot y + x} \]

       2. *-commutative 73.7%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.0692910599291889} + x \]

       3. fma-define 73.7%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 0.0692910599291889, x\right)} \]

   11. Simplified 73.7%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 0.0692910599291889, x\right)} \]

   12. Taylor expanded in y around inf 63.4%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot y} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 63.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.95 \cdot 10^{-45}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -6.4 \cdot 10^{-118}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 0.08333333333333323\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -2.5 \cdot 10^{-118}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -1.9 \cdot 10^{-201}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 0.08333333333333323\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 4 \cdot 10^{-158}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 97.2% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5.5 \cdot 10^{+21} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 8.8 \cdot 10^{-38}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.08333333333333323 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(0.0007936505811533442 + z \cdot -0.0005951669793454025\right) - 0.00277777777751721\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -5.5e+21) (not (<= z 8.8e-38)))
   (+ x (* y 0.0692910599291889))
   (+
    x
    (*
     y
     (+
      0.08333333333333323
      (*
       z
       (-
        (* z (+ 0.0007936505811533442 (* z -0.0005951669793454025)))
        0.00277777777751721)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -5.5e+21) || !(z <= 8.8e-38)) {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323 + (z * ((z * (0.0007936505811533442 + (z * -0.0005951669793454025))) - 0.00277777777751721))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-5.5d+21)) .or. (.not. (z <= 8.8d-38))) then
        tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889d0)
    else
        tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323d0 + (z * ((z * (0.0007936505811533442d0 + (z * (-0.0005951669793454025d0)))) - 0.00277777777751721d0))))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -5.5e+21) || !(z <= 8.8e-38)) {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323 + (z * ((z * (0.0007936505811533442 + (z * -0.0005951669793454025))) - 0.00277777777751721))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -5.5e+21) or not (z <= 8.8e-38):
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889)
	else:
		tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323 + (z * ((z * (0.0007936505811533442 + (z * -0.0005951669793454025))) - 0.00277777777751721))))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -5.5e+21) || !(z <= 8.8e-38))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * 0.0692910599291889));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(0.08333333333333323 + Float64(z * Float64(Float64(z * Float64(0.0007936505811533442 + Float64(z * -0.0005951669793454025))) - 0.00277777777751721)))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -5.5e+21) || ~((z <= 8.8e-38)))
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	else
		tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323 + (z * ((z * (0.0007936505811533442 + (z * -0.0005951669793454025))) - 0.00277777777751721))));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -5.5e+21], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 8.8e-38]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(y * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(y * N[(0.08333333333333323 + N[(z * N[(N[(z * N[(0.0007936505811533442 + N[(z * -0.0005951669793454025), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - 0.00277777777751721), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -5.5e21 or 8.80000000000000029e-38 < z

   1. Initial program 36.3%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 36.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]

      2. associate-/l* 53.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]

      3. fma-define 53.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]

      4. remove-double-neg 53.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{-\left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)}, x\right) \]

      5. remove-double-neg 53.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}}, x\right) \]

      6. *-commutative 53.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      7. fma-define 53.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      8. fma-define 53.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      9. *-commutative 53.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      10. fma-define 53.3%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]

   3. Simplified 53.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 98.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 98.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot y + x} \]

   7. Simplified 98.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot y + x} \]

   if -5.5e21 < z < 8.80000000000000029e-38

   1. Initial program 99.6%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. remove-double-neg 99.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{-\left(-y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      2. distribute-lft-neg-out 99.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{-\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      3. distribute-neg-frac 99.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)} \]

      4. associate-/l* 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}}\right) \]

      5. distribute-rgt-neg-in 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)} \]

      6. distribute-lft-neg-in 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      7. distribute-rgt-neg-in 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      8. remove-double-neg 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 96.7%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.08333333333333323 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(0.0007936505811533442 + -0.0005951669793454025 \cdot z\right) - 0.00277777777751721\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 97.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5.5 \cdot 10^{+21} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 8.8 \cdot 10^{-38}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.08333333333333323 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(0.0007936505811533442 + z \cdot -0.0005951669793454025\right) - 0.00277777777751721\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 61.4% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -2.9 \cdot 10^{-59}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -1.4 \cdot 10^{-157} \lor \neg \left(x \leq -1.75 \cdot 10^{-178}\right) \land x \leq 3.1 \cdot 10^{-152}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -2.9e-59)
   x
   (if (or (<= x -1.4e-157) (and (not (<= x -1.75e-178)) (<= x 3.1e-152)))
     (* y 0.0692910599291889)
     x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -2.9e-59) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if ((x <= -1.4e-157) || (!(x <= -1.75e-178) && (x <= 3.1e-152))) {
		tmp = y * 0.0692910599291889;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-2.9d-59)) then
        tmp = x
    else if ((x <= (-1.4d-157)) .or. (.not. (x <= (-1.75d-178))) .and. (x <= 3.1d-152)) then
        tmp = y * 0.0692910599291889d0
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -2.9e-59) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if ((x <= -1.4e-157) || (!(x <= -1.75e-178) && (x <= 3.1e-152))) {
		tmp = y * 0.0692910599291889;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -2.9e-59:
		tmp = x
	elif (x <= -1.4e-157) or (not (x <= -1.75e-178) and (x <= 3.1e-152)):
		tmp = y * 0.0692910599291889
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -2.9e-59)
		tmp = x;
	elseif ((x <= -1.4e-157) || (!(x <= -1.75e-178) && (x <= 3.1e-152)))
		tmp = Float64(y * 0.0692910599291889);
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -2.9e-59)
		tmp = x;
	elseif ((x <= -1.4e-157) || (~((x <= -1.75e-178)) && (x <= 3.1e-152)))
		tmp = y * 0.0692910599291889;
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[x, -2.9e-59], x, If[Or[LessEqual[x, -1.4e-157], And[N[Not[LessEqual[x, -1.75e-178]], $MachinePrecision], LessEqual[x, 3.1e-152]]], N[(y * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision], x]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -2.90000000000000016e-59 or -1.40000000000000005e-157 < x < -1.74999999999999992e-178 or 3.0999999999999998e-152 < x

   1. Initial program 75.2%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 75.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]

      2. associate-/l* 81.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]

      3. fma-define 81.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]

      4. remove-double-neg 81.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{-\left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)}, x\right) \]

      5. remove-double-neg 81.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}}, x\right) \]

      6. *-commutative 81.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      7. fma-define 81.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      8. fma-define 81.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      9. *-commutative 81.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      10. fma-define 81.9%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]

   3. Simplified 81.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 64.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if -2.90000000000000016e-59 < x < -1.40000000000000005e-157 or -1.74999999999999992e-178 < x < 3.0999999999999998e-152

   1. Initial program 53.5%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 53.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]

      2. *-commutative 53.5%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right) \cdot y}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x \]

      3. associate-/l* 63.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right) \cdot \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]

      4. fma-define 63.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525, \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]

      5. *-commutative 63.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525, \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      6. fma-define 63.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}, \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      7. fma-define 63.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      8. *-commutative 63.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      9. fma-define 63.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]

   3. Simplified 63.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. clear-num 63.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}{y}}}, x\right) \]

      2. inv-pow 63.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \color{blue}{{\left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}{y}\right)}^{-1}}, x\right) \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 63.3%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \color{blue}{{\left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}{y}\right)}^{-1}}, x\right) \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow-1 63.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}{y}}}, x\right) \]

   8. Simplified 63.3%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}{y}}}, x\right) \]

   9. Taylor expanded in z around inf 69.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

       1. +-commutative 69.1%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot y + x} \]

       2. *-commutative 69.1%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.0692910599291889} + x \]

       3. fma-define 69.1%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 0.0692910599291889, x\right)} \]

   11. Simplified 69.1%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 0.0692910599291889, x\right)} \]

   12. Taylor expanded in y around inf 58.7%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 63.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -2.9 \cdot 10^{-59}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -1.4 \cdot 10^{-157} \lor \neg \left(x \leq -1.75 \cdot 10^{-178}\right) \land x \leq 3.1 \cdot 10^{-152}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 97.2% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5.5 \cdot 10^{+21} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 8.8 \cdot 10^{-38}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.08333333333333323 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0007936505811533442 - 0.00277777777751721\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -5.5e+21) (not (<= z 8.8e-38)))
   (+ x (* y 0.0692910599291889))
   (+
    x
    (*
     y
     (+
      0.08333333333333323
      (* z (- (* z 0.0007936505811533442) 0.00277777777751721)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -5.5e+21) || !(z <= 8.8e-38)) {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323 + (z * ((z * 0.0007936505811533442) - 0.00277777777751721))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-5.5d+21)) .or. (.not. (z <= 8.8d-38))) then
        tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889d0)
    else
        tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323d0 + (z * ((z * 0.0007936505811533442d0) - 0.00277777777751721d0))))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -5.5e+21) || !(z <= 8.8e-38)) {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323 + (z * ((z * 0.0007936505811533442) - 0.00277777777751721))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -5.5e+21) or not (z <= 8.8e-38):
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889)
	else:
		tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323 + (z * ((z * 0.0007936505811533442) - 0.00277777777751721))))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -5.5e+21) || !(z <= 8.8e-38))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * 0.0692910599291889));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(0.08333333333333323 + Float64(z * Float64(Float64(z * 0.0007936505811533442) - 0.00277777777751721)))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -5.5e+21) || ~((z <= 8.8e-38)))
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	else
		tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323 + (z * ((z * 0.0007936505811533442) - 0.00277777777751721))));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -5.5e+21], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 8.8e-38]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(y * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(y * N[(0.08333333333333323 + N[(z * N[(N[(z * 0.0007936505811533442), $MachinePrecision] - 0.00277777777751721), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -5.5e21 or 8.80000000000000029e-38 < z

   1. Initial program 36.3%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 36.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]

      2. associate-/l* 53.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]

      3. fma-define 53.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]

      4. remove-double-neg 53.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{-\left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)}, x\right) \]

      5. remove-double-neg 53.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}}, x\right) \]

      6. *-commutative 53.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      7. fma-define 53.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      8. fma-define 53.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      9. *-commutative 53.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      10. fma-define 53.3%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]

   3. Simplified 53.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 98.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 98.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot y + x} \]

   7. Simplified 98.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot y + x} \]

   if -5.5e21 < z < 8.80000000000000029e-38

   1. Initial program 99.6%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. remove-double-neg 99.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{-\left(-y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      2. distribute-lft-neg-out 99.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{-\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      3. distribute-neg-frac 99.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)} \]

      4. associate-/l* 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}}\right) \]

      5. distribute-rgt-neg-in 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)} \]

      6. distribute-lft-neg-in 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      7. distribute-rgt-neg-in 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      8. remove-double-neg 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 96.6%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.08333333333333323 + z \cdot \left(0.0007936505811533442 \cdot z - 0.00277777777751721\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 97.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5.5 \cdot 10^{+21} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 8.8 \cdot 10^{-38}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.08333333333333323 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0007936505811533442 - 0.00277777777751721\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 97.6% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5.5 \cdot 10^{+21} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 9.8 \cdot 10^{-26}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(-0.00277777777751721 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) + y \cdot 0.08333333333333323\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -5.5e+21) (not (<= z 9.8e-26)))
   (+ x (* y 0.0692910599291889))
   (+ x (+ (* -0.00277777777751721 (* y z)) (* y 0.08333333333333323)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -5.5e+21) || !(z <= 9.8e-26)) {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	} else {
		tmp = x + ((-0.00277777777751721 * (y * z)) + (y * 0.08333333333333323));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-5.5d+21)) .or. (.not. (z <= 9.8d-26))) then
        tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889d0)
    else
        tmp = x + (((-0.00277777777751721d0) * (y * z)) + (y * 0.08333333333333323d0))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -5.5e+21) || !(z <= 9.8e-26)) {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	} else {
		tmp = x + ((-0.00277777777751721 * (y * z)) + (y * 0.08333333333333323));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -5.5e+21) or not (z <= 9.8e-26):
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889)
	else:
		tmp = x + ((-0.00277777777751721 * (y * z)) + (y * 0.08333333333333323))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -5.5e+21) || !(z <= 9.8e-26))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * 0.0692910599291889));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(-0.00277777777751721 * Float64(y * z)) + Float64(y * 0.08333333333333323)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -5.5e+21) || ~((z <= 9.8e-26)))
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	else
		tmp = x + ((-0.00277777777751721 * (y * z)) + (y * 0.08333333333333323));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -5.5e+21], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 9.8e-26]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(y * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(N[(-0.00277777777751721 * N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * 0.08333333333333323), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -5.5e21 or 9.7999999999999998e-26 < z

   1. Initial program 35.3%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 35.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]

      2. associate-/l* 52.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]

      3. fma-define 52.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]

      4. remove-double-neg 52.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{-\left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)}, x\right) \]

      5. remove-double-neg 52.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}}, x\right) \]

      6. *-commutative 52.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      7. fma-define 52.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      8. fma-define 52.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      9. *-commutative 52.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      10. fma-define 52.6%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]

   3. Simplified 52.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 98.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 98.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot y + x} \]

   7. Simplified 98.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot y + x} \]

   if -5.5e21 < z < 9.7999999999999998e-26

   1. Initial program 99.6%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. remove-double-neg 99.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{-\left(-y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      2. distribute-lft-neg-out 99.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{-\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      3. distribute-neg-frac 99.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)} \]

      4. associate-/l* 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}}\right) \]

      5. distribute-rgt-neg-in 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)} \]

      6. distribute-lft-neg-in 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      7. distribute-rgt-neg-in 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      8. remove-double-neg 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 96.7%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.08333333333333323 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(0.0007936505811533442 + -0.0005951669793454025 \cdot z\right) - 0.00277777777751721\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around 0 96.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-0.00277777777751721 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) + 0.08333333333333323 \cdot y\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 97.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5.5 \cdot 10^{+21} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 9.8 \cdot 10^{-26}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(-0.00277777777751721 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) + y \cdot 0.08333333333333323\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 97.6% accurate, 1.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5.5 \cdot 10^{+21} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 9.8 \cdot 10^{-26}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.08333333333333323 + z \cdot -0.00277777777751721\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -5.5e+21) (not (<= z 9.8e-26)))
   (+ x (* y 0.0692910599291889))
   (+ x (* y (+ 0.08333333333333323 (* z -0.00277777777751721))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -5.5e+21) || !(z <= 9.8e-26)) {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323 + (z * -0.00277777777751721)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-5.5d+21)) .or. (.not. (z <= 9.8d-26))) then
        tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889d0)
    else
        tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323d0 + (z * (-0.00277777777751721d0))))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -5.5e+21) || !(z <= 9.8e-26)) {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323 + (z * -0.00277777777751721)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -5.5e+21) or not (z <= 9.8e-26):
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889)
	else:
		tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323 + (z * -0.00277777777751721)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -5.5e+21) || !(z <= 9.8e-26))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * 0.0692910599291889));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(0.08333333333333323 + Float64(z * -0.00277777777751721))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -5.5e+21) || ~((z <= 9.8e-26)))
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	else
		tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323 + (z * -0.00277777777751721)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -5.5e+21], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 9.8e-26]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(y * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(y * N[(0.08333333333333323 + N[(z * -0.00277777777751721), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -5.5e21 or 9.7999999999999998e-26 < z

   1. Initial program 35.3%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 35.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]

      2. associate-/l* 52.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]

      3. fma-define 52.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]

      4. remove-double-neg 52.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{-\left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)}, x\right) \]

      5. remove-double-neg 52.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}}, x\right) \]

      6. *-commutative 52.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      7. fma-define 52.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      8. fma-define 52.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      9. *-commutative 52.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      10. fma-define 52.6%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]

   3. Simplified 52.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 98.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 98.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot y + x} \]

   7. Simplified 98.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot y + x} \]

   if -5.5e21 < z < 9.7999999999999998e-26

   1. Initial program 99.6%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. remove-double-neg 99.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{-\left(-y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      2. distribute-lft-neg-out 99.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{-\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      3. distribute-neg-frac 99.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)} \]

      4. associate-/l* 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}}\right) \]

      5. distribute-rgt-neg-in 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)} \]

      6. distribute-lft-neg-in 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      7. distribute-rgt-neg-in 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      8. remove-double-neg 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 96.6%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.08333333333333323 + -0.00277777777751721 \cdot z\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 97.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5.5 \cdot 10^{+21} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 9.8 \cdot 10^{-26}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.08333333333333323 + z \cdot -0.00277777777751721\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 12: 97.4% accurate, 1.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -3.7 \cdot 10^{+15} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 8.8 \cdot 10^{-38}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.08333333333333323\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -3.7e+15) (not (<= z 8.8e-38)))
   (+ x (* y 0.0692910599291889))
   (+ x (* y 0.08333333333333323))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -3.7e+15) || !(z <= 8.8e-38)) {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.08333333333333323);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-3.7d+15)) .or. (.not. (z <= 8.8d-38))) then
        tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889d0)
    else
        tmp = x + (y * 0.08333333333333323d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -3.7e+15) || !(z <= 8.8e-38)) {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.08333333333333323);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -3.7e+15) or not (z <= 8.8e-38):
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889)
	else:
		tmp = x + (y * 0.08333333333333323)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -3.7e+15) || !(z <= 8.8e-38))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * 0.0692910599291889));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * 0.08333333333333323));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -3.7e+15) || ~((z <= 8.8e-38)))
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	else
		tmp = x + (y * 0.08333333333333323);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -3.7e+15], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 8.8e-38]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(y * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(y * 0.08333333333333323), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -3.7e15 or 8.80000000000000029e-38 < z

   1. Initial program 36.8%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 36.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]

      2. associate-/l* 53.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]

      3. fma-define 53.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]

      4. remove-double-neg 53.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{-\left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)}, x\right) \]

      5. remove-double-neg 53.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}}, x\right) \]

      6. *-commutative 53.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      7. fma-define 53.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      8. fma-define 53.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      9. *-commutative 53.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      10. fma-define 53.7%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]

   3. Simplified 53.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 98.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 98.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot y + x} \]

   7. Simplified 98.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot y + x} \]

   if -3.7e15 < z < 8.80000000000000029e-38

   1. Initial program 99.5%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]

      2. associate-/l* 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]

      3. fma-define 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]

      4. remove-double-neg 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{-\left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)}, x\right) \]

      5. remove-double-neg 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}}, x\right) \]

      6. *-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      7. fma-define 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      8. fma-define 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      9. *-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      10. fma-define 99.8%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 96.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + 0.08333333333333323 \cdot y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 96.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.08333333333333323 \cdot y + x} \]

   7. Simplified 96.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.08333333333333323 \cdot y + x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 97.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -3.7 \cdot 10^{+15} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 8.8 \cdot 10^{-38}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.08333333333333323\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 13: 80.0% accurate, 4.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (* y 0.0692910599291889)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889d0)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (y * 0.0692910599291889)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(y * 0.0692910599291889))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(y * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 68.7%

   \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 68.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]

   2. associate-/l* 77.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]

   3. fma-define 77.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]

   4. remove-double-neg 77.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{-\left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)}, x\right) \]

   5. remove-double-neg 77.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}}, x\right) \]

   6. *-commutative 77.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

   7. fma-define 77.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

   8. fma-define 77.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

   9. *-commutative 77.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

   10. fma-define 77.1%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]

3. Simplified 77.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 79.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 79.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot y + x} \]

7. Simplified 79.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot y + x} \]

8. Final simplification 79.8%

   \[\leadsto x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889 \]
9. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 14: 51.8% accurate, 21.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 68.7%

   \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 68.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]

   2. associate-/l* 77.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]

   3. fma-define 77.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]

   4. remove-double-neg 77.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{-\left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)}, x\right) \]

   5. remove-double-neg 77.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}}, x\right) \]

   6. *-commutative 77.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

   7. fma-define 77.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

   8. fma-define 77.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

   9. *-commutative 77.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

   10. fma-define 77.1%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]

3. Simplified 77.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 49.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Developer target: 99.4% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \left(\frac{0.07512208616047561}{z} + 0.0692910599291889\right) \cdot y - \left(\frac{0.40462203869992125 \cdot y}{z \cdot z} - x\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;z < -8120153.652456675:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z < 6.576118972787377 \cdot 10^{+20}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0
         (-
          (* (+ (/ 0.07512208616047561 z) 0.0692910599291889) y)
          (- (/ (* 0.40462203869992125 y) (* z z)) x))))
   (if (< z -8120153.652456675)
     t_0
     (if (< z 6.576118972787377e+20)
       (+
        x
        (*
         (*
          y
          (+
           (* (+ (* z 0.0692910599291889) 0.4917317610505968) z)
           0.279195317918525))
         (/ 1.0 (+ (* (+ z 6.012459259764103) z) 3.350343815022304))))
       t_0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = (((0.07512208616047561 / z) + 0.0692910599291889) * y) - (((0.40462203869992125 * y) / (z * z)) - x);
	double tmp;
	if (z < -8120153.652456675) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (z < 6.576118972787377e+20) {
		tmp = x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) * (1.0 / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304)));
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = (((0.07512208616047561d0 / z) + 0.0692910599291889d0) * y) - (((0.40462203869992125d0 * y) / (z * z)) - x)
    if (z < (-8120153.652456675d0)) then
        tmp = t_0
    else if (z < 6.576118972787377d+20) then
        tmp = x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889d0) + 0.4917317610505968d0) * z) + 0.279195317918525d0)) * (1.0d0 / (((z + 6.012459259764103d0) * z) + 3.350343815022304d0)))
    else
        tmp = t_0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = (((0.07512208616047561 / z) + 0.0692910599291889) * y) - (((0.40462203869992125 * y) / (z * z)) - x);
	double tmp;
	if (z < -8120153.652456675) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (z < 6.576118972787377e+20) {
		tmp = x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) * (1.0 / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304)));
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	t_0 = (((0.07512208616047561 / z) + 0.0692910599291889) * y) - (((0.40462203869992125 * y) / (z * z)) - x)
	tmp = 0
	if z < -8120153.652456675:
		tmp = t_0
	elif z < 6.576118972787377e+20:
		tmp = x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) * (1.0 / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304)))
	else:
		tmp = t_0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(0.07512208616047561 / z) + 0.0692910599291889) * y) - Float64(Float64(Float64(0.40462203869992125 * y) / Float64(z * z)) - x))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z < -8120153.652456675)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (z < 6.576118972787377e+20)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) * Float64(1.0 / Float64(Float64(Float64(z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304))));
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = (((0.07512208616047561 / z) + 0.0692910599291889) * y) - (((0.40462203869992125 * y) / (z * z)) - x);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z < -8120153.652456675)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (z < 6.576118972787377e+20)
		tmp = x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) * (1.0 / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304)));
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(N[(N[(0.07512208616047561 / z), $MachinePrecision] + 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(N[(0.40462203869992125 * y), $MachinePrecision] / N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[Less[z, -8120153.652456675], t$95$0, If[Less[z, 6.576118972787377e+20], N[(x + N[(N[(y * N[(N[(N[(N[(z * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision] + 0.4917317610505968), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] + 0.279195317918525), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.0 / N[(N[(N[(z + 6.012459259764103), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] + 3.350343815022304), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$0]]]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024107 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Numeric.SpecFunctions:logGamma from math-functions-0.1.5.2, B"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (if (< z -8120153.652456675) (- (* (+ (/ 0.07512208616047561 z) 0.0692910599291889) y) (- (/ (* 0.40462203869992125 y) (* z z)) x)) (if (< z 6.576118972787377e+20) (+ x (* (* y (+ (* (+ (* z 0.0692910599291889) 0.4917317610505968) z) 0.279195317918525)) (/ 1.0 (+ (* (+ z 6.012459259764103) z) 3.350343815022304)))) (- (* (+ (/ 0.07512208616047561 z) 0.0692910599291889) y) (- (/ (* 0.40462203869992125 y) (* z z)) x))))

  (+ x (/ (* y (+ (* (+ (* z 0.0692910599291889) 0.4917317610505968) z) 0.279195317918525)) (+ (* (+ z 6.012459259764103) z) 3.350343815022304))))