VandenBroeck and Keller, Equation (20)

Percentage Accurate: 6.9% → 99.0%
Time: 43.2s
Alternatives: 6
Speedup: 4.8×

Specification

?
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f\\ t_1 := e^{t\_0}\\ t_2 := e^{-t\_0}\\ -\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \left(\frac{t\_1 + t\_2}{t\_1 - t\_2}\right) \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (f)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* (/ PI 4.0) f)) (t_1 (exp t_0)) (t_2 (exp (- t_0))))
   (- (* (/ 1.0 (/ PI 4.0)) (log (/ (+ t_1 t_2) (- t_1 t_2)))))))
double code(double f) {
	double t_0 = (((double) M_PI) / 4.0) * f;
	double t_1 = exp(t_0);
	double t_2 = exp(-t_0);
	return -((1.0 / (((double) M_PI) / 4.0)) * log(((t_1 + t_2) / (t_1 - t_2))));
}
public static double code(double f) {
	double t_0 = (Math.PI / 4.0) * f;
	double t_1 = Math.exp(t_0);
	double t_2 = Math.exp(-t_0);
	return -((1.0 / (Math.PI / 4.0)) * Math.log(((t_1 + t_2) / (t_1 - t_2))));
}
def code(f):
	t_0 = (math.pi / 4.0) * f
	t_1 = math.exp(t_0)
	t_2 = math.exp(-t_0)
	return -((1.0 / (math.pi / 4.0)) * math.log(((t_1 + t_2) / (t_1 - t_2))))
function code(f)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(pi / 4.0) * f)
	t_1 = exp(t_0)
	t_2 = exp(Float64(-t_0))
	return Float64(-Float64(Float64(1.0 / Float64(pi / 4.0)) * log(Float64(Float64(t_1 + t_2) / Float64(t_1 - t_2)))))
end
function tmp = code(f)
	t_0 = (pi / 4.0) * f;
	t_1 = exp(t_0);
	t_2 = exp(-t_0);
	tmp = -((1.0 / (pi / 4.0)) * log(((t_1 + t_2) / (t_1 - t_2))));
end
code[f_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(Pi / 4.0), $MachinePrecision] * f), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$1 = N[Exp[t$95$0], $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[Exp[(-t$95$0)], $MachinePrecision]}, (-N[(N[(1.0 / N[(Pi / 4.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[N[(N[(t$95$1 + t$95$2), $MachinePrecision] / N[(t$95$1 - t$95$2), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision])]]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f\\
t_1 := e^{t\_0}\\
t_2 := e^{-t\_0}\\
-\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \left(\frac{t\_1 + t\_2}{t\_1 - t\_2}\right)
\end{array}
\end{array}

Sampling outcomes in binary64 precision:

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 6 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 6.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f\\ t_1 := e^{t\_0}\\ t_2 := e^{-t\_0}\\ -\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \left(\frac{t\_1 + t\_2}{t\_1 - t\_2}\right) \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (f)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* (/ PI 4.0) f)) (t_1 (exp t_0)) (t_2 (exp (- t_0))))
   (- (* (/ 1.0 (/ PI 4.0)) (log (/ (+ t_1 t_2) (- t_1 t_2)))))))
double code(double f) {
	double t_0 = (((double) M_PI) / 4.0) * f;
	double t_1 = exp(t_0);
	double t_2 = exp(-t_0);
	return -((1.0 / (((double) M_PI) / 4.0)) * log(((t_1 + t_2) / (t_1 - t_2))));
}
public static double code(double f) {
	double t_0 = (Math.PI / 4.0) * f;
	double t_1 = Math.exp(t_0);
	double t_2 = Math.exp(-t_0);
	return -((1.0 / (Math.PI / 4.0)) * Math.log(((t_1 + t_2) / (t_1 - t_2))));
}
def code(f):
	t_0 = (math.pi / 4.0) * f
	t_1 = math.exp(t_0)
	t_2 = math.exp(-t_0)
	return -((1.0 / (math.pi / 4.0)) * math.log(((t_1 + t_2) / (t_1 - t_2))))
function code(f)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(pi / 4.0) * f)
	t_1 = exp(t_0)
	t_2 = exp(Float64(-t_0))
	return Float64(-Float64(Float64(1.0 / Float64(pi / 4.0)) * log(Float64(Float64(t_1 + t_2) / Float64(t_1 - t_2)))))
end
function tmp = code(f)
	t_0 = (pi / 4.0) * f;
	t_1 = exp(t_0);
	t_2 = exp(-t_0);
	tmp = -((1.0 / (pi / 4.0)) * log(((t_1 + t_2) / (t_1 - t_2))));
end
code[f_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(Pi / 4.0), $MachinePrecision] * f), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$1 = N[Exp[t$95$0], $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[Exp[(-t$95$0)], $MachinePrecision]}, (-N[(N[(1.0 / N[(Pi / 4.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[N[(N[(t$95$1 + t$95$2), $MachinePrecision] / N[(t$95$1 - t$95$2), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision])]]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f\\
t_1 := e^{t\_0}\\
t_2 := e^{-t\_0}\\
-\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \left(\frac{t\_1 + t\_2}{t\_1 - t\_2}\right)
\end{array}
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 99.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -4 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left({\left(\sqrt{\pi}\right)}^{2} \cdot \left(f \cdot 0.5\right)\right)} + \left(-1 + \frac{-1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\pi \cdot \left(f \cdot -0.5\right)\right)}\right)\right)}{\pi} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (f)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  -4.0
  (/
   (log1p
    (+
     (/ 1.0 (expm1 (* (pow (sqrt PI) 2.0) (* f 0.5))))
     (+ -1.0 (/ -1.0 (expm1 (* PI (* f -0.5)))))))
   PI)))
double code(double f) {
	return -4.0 * (log1p(((1.0 / expm1((pow(sqrt(((double) M_PI)), 2.0) * (f * 0.5)))) + (-1.0 + (-1.0 / expm1((((double) M_PI) * (f * -0.5))))))) / ((double) M_PI));
}
public static double code(double f) {
	return -4.0 * (Math.log1p(((1.0 / Math.expm1((Math.pow(Math.sqrt(Math.PI), 2.0) * (f * 0.5)))) + (-1.0 + (-1.0 / Math.expm1((Math.PI * (f * -0.5))))))) / Math.PI);
}
def code(f):
	return -4.0 * (math.log1p(((1.0 / math.expm1((math.pow(math.sqrt(math.pi), 2.0) * (f * 0.5)))) + (-1.0 + (-1.0 / math.expm1((math.pi * (f * -0.5))))))) / math.pi)
function code(f)
	return Float64(-4.0 * Float64(log1p(Float64(Float64(1.0 / expm1(Float64((sqrt(pi) ^ 2.0) * Float64(f * 0.5)))) + Float64(-1.0 + Float64(-1.0 / expm1(Float64(pi * Float64(f * -0.5))))))) / pi))
end
code[f_] := N[(-4.0 * N[(N[Log[1 + N[(N[(1.0 / N[(Exp[N[(N[Power[N[Sqrt[Pi], $MachinePrecision], 2.0], $MachinePrecision] * N[(f * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]] - 1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(-1.0 + N[(-1.0 / N[(Exp[N[(Pi * N[(f * -0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]] - 1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / Pi), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
-4 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left({\left(\sqrt{\pi}\right)}^{2} \cdot \left(f \cdot 0.5\right)\right)} + \left(-1 + \frac{-1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\pi \cdot \left(f \cdot -0.5\right)\right)}\right)\right)}{\pi}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 6.3%

    \[-\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} + e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} - e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.6%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left(\frac{1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\left(\pi \cdot f\right) \cdot 0.5\right)} + \frac{-1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\left(\pi \cdot f\right) \cdot -0.5\right)}\right) \cdot \frac{-4}{\pi}} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Taylor expanded in f around inf 4.2%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \frac{\log \left(\frac{1}{e^{0.5 \cdot \left(f \cdot \pi\right)} - 1} - \frac{1}{e^{-0.5 \cdot \left(f \cdot \pi\right)} - 1}\right)}{\pi}} \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. expm1-define4.4%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \frac{\log \left(\frac{1}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(0.5 \cdot \left(f \cdot \pi\right)\right)}} - \frac{1}{e^{-0.5 \cdot \left(f \cdot \pi\right)} - 1}\right)}{\pi} \]
    2. *-commutative4.4%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \frac{\log \left(\frac{1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\left(f \cdot \pi\right) \cdot 0.5}\right)} - \frac{1}{e^{-0.5 \cdot \left(f \cdot \pi\right)} - 1}\right)}{\pi} \]
    3. expm1-define98.7%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \frac{\log \left(\frac{1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\left(f \cdot \pi\right) \cdot 0.5\right)} - \frac{1}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(-0.5 \cdot \left(f \cdot \pi\right)\right)}}\right)}{\pi} \]
    4. *-commutative98.7%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \frac{\log \left(\frac{1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\left(f \cdot \pi\right) \cdot 0.5\right)} - \frac{1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\left(f \cdot \pi\right) \cdot -0.5}\right)}\right)}{\pi} \]
  6. Simplified98.7%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \frac{\log \left(\frac{1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\left(f \cdot \pi\right) \cdot 0.5\right)} - \frac{1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\left(f \cdot \pi\right) \cdot -0.5\right)}\right)}{\pi}} \]
  7. Step-by-step derivation
    1. rem-cbrt-cube98.7%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \frac{\log \left(\frac{1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\left(f \cdot \pi\right) \cdot 0.5\right)} - \frac{1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\left(f \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt[3]{{\pi}^{3}}}\right) \cdot -0.5\right)}\right)}{\pi} \]
  8. Applied egg-rr98.7%

    \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \frac{\log \left(\frac{1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\left(f \cdot \pi\right) \cdot 0.5\right)} - \frac{1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\left(f \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt[3]{{\pi}^{3}}}\right) \cdot -0.5\right)}\right)}{\pi} \]
  9. Step-by-step derivation
    1. rem-cbrt-cube98.7%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \frac{\log \left(\frac{1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\left(f \cdot \pi\right) \cdot 0.5\right)} - \frac{1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\left(f \cdot \color{blue}{\pi}\right) \cdot -0.5\right)}\right)}{\pi} \]
    2. log1p-expm1-u98.7%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\mathsf{expm1}\left(\log \left(\frac{1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\left(f \cdot \pi\right) \cdot 0.5\right)} - \frac{1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\left(f \cdot \pi\right) \cdot -0.5\right)}\right)\right)\right)}}{\pi} \]
    3. expm1-undefine98.7%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{e^{\log \left(\frac{1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\left(f \cdot \pi\right) \cdot 0.5\right)} - \frac{1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\left(f \cdot \pi\right) \cdot -0.5\right)}\right)} - 1}\right)}{\pi} \]
  10. Applied egg-rr98.7%

    \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(\frac{1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\pi \cdot \left(f \cdot 0.5\right)\right)} - \frac{1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\left(\pi \cdot f\right) \cdot -0.5\right)}\right) - 1\right)}}{\pi} \]
  11. Step-by-step derivation
    1. sub-neg98.7%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\pi \cdot \left(f \cdot 0.5\right)\right)} + \left(-\frac{1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\left(\pi \cdot f\right) \cdot -0.5\right)}\right)\right)} - 1\right)}{\pi} \]
    2. distribute-neg-frac98.7%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(\frac{1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\pi \cdot \left(f \cdot 0.5\right)\right)} + \color{blue}{\frac{-1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\left(\pi \cdot f\right) \cdot -0.5\right)}}\right) - 1\right)}{\pi} \]
    3. metadata-eval98.7%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(\frac{1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\pi \cdot \left(f \cdot 0.5\right)\right)} + \frac{\color{blue}{-1}}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\left(\pi \cdot f\right) \cdot -0.5\right)}\right) - 1\right)}{\pi} \]
    4. associate--l+98.8%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\frac{1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\pi \cdot \left(f \cdot 0.5\right)\right)} + \left(\frac{-1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\left(\pi \cdot f\right) \cdot -0.5\right)} - 1\right)}\right)}{\pi} \]
    5. *-commutative98.8%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\pi \cdot \left(f \cdot 0.5\right)\right)} + \left(\frac{-1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\left(f \cdot \pi\right)} \cdot -0.5\right)} - 1\right)\right)}{\pi} \]
    6. *-commutative98.8%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\pi \cdot \left(f \cdot 0.5\right)\right)} + \left(\frac{-1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{-0.5 \cdot \left(f \cdot \pi\right)}\right)} - 1\right)\right)}{\pi} \]
    7. associate-*r*98.8%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\pi \cdot \left(f \cdot 0.5\right)\right)} + \left(\frac{-1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-0.5 \cdot f\right) \cdot \pi}\right)} - 1\right)\right)}{\pi} \]
  12. Simplified98.8%

    \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\pi \cdot \left(f \cdot 0.5\right)\right)} + \left(\frac{-1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\left(-0.5 \cdot f\right) \cdot \pi\right)} - 1\right)\right)}}{\pi} \]
  13. Step-by-step derivation
    1. add-sqr-sqrt98.8%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{\pi} \cdot \sqrt{\pi}\right)} \cdot \left(f \cdot 0.5\right)\right)} + \left(\frac{-1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\left(-0.5 \cdot f\right) \cdot \pi\right)} - 1\right)\right)}{\pi} \]
    2. pow298.8%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt{\pi}\right)}^{2}} \cdot \left(f \cdot 0.5\right)\right)} + \left(\frac{-1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\left(-0.5 \cdot f\right) \cdot \pi\right)} - 1\right)\right)}{\pi} \]
  14. Applied egg-rr98.8%

    \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt{\pi}\right)}^{2}} \cdot \left(f \cdot 0.5\right)\right)} + \left(\frac{-1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\left(-0.5 \cdot f\right) \cdot \pi\right)} - 1\right)\right)}{\pi} \]
  15. Final simplification98.8%

    \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left({\left(\sqrt{\pi}\right)}^{2} \cdot \left(f \cdot 0.5\right)\right)} + \left(-1 + \frac{-1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\pi \cdot \left(f \cdot -0.5\right)\right)}\right)\right)}{\pi} \]
  16. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 99.0% accurate, 1.7× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -4 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(-1 + \frac{-1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\pi \cdot \left(f \cdot -0.5\right)\right)}\right) + \frac{1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\pi \cdot \left(f \cdot 0.5\right)\right)}\right)}{\pi} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (f)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  -4.0
  (/
   (log1p
    (+
     (+ -1.0 (/ -1.0 (expm1 (* PI (* f -0.5)))))
     (/ 1.0 (expm1 (* PI (* f 0.5))))))
   PI)))
double code(double f) {
	return -4.0 * (log1p(((-1.0 + (-1.0 / expm1((((double) M_PI) * (f * -0.5))))) + (1.0 / expm1((((double) M_PI) * (f * 0.5)))))) / ((double) M_PI));
}
public static double code(double f) {
	return -4.0 * (Math.log1p(((-1.0 + (-1.0 / Math.expm1((Math.PI * (f * -0.5))))) + (1.0 / Math.expm1((Math.PI * (f * 0.5)))))) / Math.PI);
}
def code(f):
	return -4.0 * (math.log1p(((-1.0 + (-1.0 / math.expm1((math.pi * (f * -0.5))))) + (1.0 / math.expm1((math.pi * (f * 0.5)))))) / math.pi)
function code(f)
	return Float64(-4.0 * Float64(log1p(Float64(Float64(-1.0 + Float64(-1.0 / expm1(Float64(pi * Float64(f * -0.5))))) + Float64(1.0 / expm1(Float64(pi * Float64(f * 0.5)))))) / pi))
end
code[f_] := N[(-4.0 * N[(N[Log[1 + N[(N[(-1.0 + N[(-1.0 / N[(Exp[N[(Pi * N[(f * -0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]] - 1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(1.0 / N[(Exp[N[(Pi * N[(f * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]] - 1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / Pi), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
-4 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(-1 + \frac{-1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\pi \cdot \left(f \cdot -0.5\right)\right)}\right) + \frac{1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\pi \cdot \left(f \cdot 0.5\right)\right)}\right)}{\pi}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 6.3%

    \[-\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} + e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} - e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.6%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left(\frac{1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\left(\pi \cdot f\right) \cdot 0.5\right)} + \frac{-1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\left(\pi \cdot f\right) \cdot -0.5\right)}\right) \cdot \frac{-4}{\pi}} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Taylor expanded in f around inf 4.2%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \frac{\log \left(\frac{1}{e^{0.5 \cdot \left(f \cdot \pi\right)} - 1} - \frac{1}{e^{-0.5 \cdot \left(f \cdot \pi\right)} - 1}\right)}{\pi}} \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. expm1-define4.4%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \frac{\log \left(\frac{1}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(0.5 \cdot \left(f \cdot \pi\right)\right)}} - \frac{1}{e^{-0.5 \cdot \left(f \cdot \pi\right)} - 1}\right)}{\pi} \]
    2. *-commutative4.4%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \frac{\log \left(\frac{1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\left(f \cdot \pi\right) \cdot 0.5}\right)} - \frac{1}{e^{-0.5 \cdot \left(f \cdot \pi\right)} - 1}\right)}{\pi} \]
    3. expm1-define98.7%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \frac{\log \left(\frac{1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\left(f \cdot \pi\right) \cdot 0.5\right)} - \frac{1}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(-0.5 \cdot \left(f \cdot \pi\right)\right)}}\right)}{\pi} \]
    4. *-commutative98.7%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \frac{\log \left(\frac{1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\left(f \cdot \pi\right) \cdot 0.5\right)} - \frac{1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\left(f \cdot \pi\right) \cdot -0.5}\right)}\right)}{\pi} \]
  6. Simplified98.7%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \frac{\log \left(\frac{1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\left(f \cdot \pi\right) \cdot 0.5\right)} - \frac{1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\left(f \cdot \pi\right) \cdot -0.5\right)}\right)}{\pi}} \]
  7. Step-by-step derivation
    1. rem-cbrt-cube98.7%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \frac{\log \left(\frac{1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\left(f \cdot \pi\right) \cdot 0.5\right)} - \frac{1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\left(f \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt[3]{{\pi}^{3}}}\right) \cdot -0.5\right)}\right)}{\pi} \]
  8. Applied egg-rr98.7%

    \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \frac{\log \left(\frac{1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\left(f \cdot \pi\right) \cdot 0.5\right)} - \frac{1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\left(f \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt[3]{{\pi}^{3}}}\right) \cdot -0.5\right)}\right)}{\pi} \]
  9. Step-by-step derivation
    1. rem-cbrt-cube98.7%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \frac{\log \left(\frac{1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\left(f \cdot \pi\right) \cdot 0.5\right)} - \frac{1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\left(f \cdot \color{blue}{\pi}\right) \cdot -0.5\right)}\right)}{\pi} \]
    2. log1p-expm1-u98.7%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\mathsf{expm1}\left(\log \left(\frac{1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\left(f \cdot \pi\right) \cdot 0.5\right)} - \frac{1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\left(f \cdot \pi\right) \cdot -0.5\right)}\right)\right)\right)}}{\pi} \]
    3. expm1-undefine98.7%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{e^{\log \left(\frac{1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\left(f \cdot \pi\right) \cdot 0.5\right)} - \frac{1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\left(f \cdot \pi\right) \cdot -0.5\right)}\right)} - 1}\right)}{\pi} \]
  10. Applied egg-rr98.7%

    \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(\frac{1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\pi \cdot \left(f \cdot 0.5\right)\right)} - \frac{1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\left(\pi \cdot f\right) \cdot -0.5\right)}\right) - 1\right)}}{\pi} \]
  11. Step-by-step derivation
    1. sub-neg98.7%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\pi \cdot \left(f \cdot 0.5\right)\right)} + \left(-\frac{1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\left(\pi \cdot f\right) \cdot -0.5\right)}\right)\right)} - 1\right)}{\pi} \]
    2. distribute-neg-frac98.7%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(\frac{1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\pi \cdot \left(f \cdot 0.5\right)\right)} + \color{blue}{\frac{-1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\left(\pi \cdot f\right) \cdot -0.5\right)}}\right) - 1\right)}{\pi} \]
    3. metadata-eval98.7%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(\frac{1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\pi \cdot \left(f \cdot 0.5\right)\right)} + \frac{\color{blue}{-1}}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\left(\pi \cdot f\right) \cdot -0.5\right)}\right) - 1\right)}{\pi} \]
    4. associate--l+98.8%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\frac{1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\pi \cdot \left(f \cdot 0.5\right)\right)} + \left(\frac{-1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\left(\pi \cdot f\right) \cdot -0.5\right)} - 1\right)}\right)}{\pi} \]
    5. *-commutative98.8%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\pi \cdot \left(f \cdot 0.5\right)\right)} + \left(\frac{-1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\left(f \cdot \pi\right)} \cdot -0.5\right)} - 1\right)\right)}{\pi} \]
    6. *-commutative98.8%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\pi \cdot \left(f \cdot 0.5\right)\right)} + \left(\frac{-1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{-0.5 \cdot \left(f \cdot \pi\right)}\right)} - 1\right)\right)}{\pi} \]
    7. associate-*r*98.8%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\pi \cdot \left(f \cdot 0.5\right)\right)} + \left(\frac{-1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-0.5 \cdot f\right) \cdot \pi}\right)} - 1\right)\right)}{\pi} \]
  12. Simplified98.8%

    \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\pi \cdot \left(f \cdot 0.5\right)\right)} + \left(\frac{-1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\left(-0.5 \cdot f\right) \cdot \pi\right)} - 1\right)\right)}}{\pi} \]
  13. Final simplification98.8%

    \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(-1 + \frac{-1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\pi \cdot \left(f \cdot -0.5\right)\right)}\right) + \frac{1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\pi \cdot \left(f \cdot 0.5\right)\right)}\right)}{\pi} \]
  14. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 98.9% accurate, 1.7× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -4 \cdot \frac{\log \left(\frac{1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(0.5 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot f\right)\right)} - \frac{1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(-0.5 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot f\right)\right)}\right)}{\pi} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (f)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  -4.0
  (/
   (log (- (/ 1.0 (expm1 (* 0.5 (* PI f)))) (/ 1.0 (expm1 (* -0.5 (* PI f))))))
   PI)))
double code(double f) {
	return -4.0 * (log(((1.0 / expm1((0.5 * (((double) M_PI) * f)))) - (1.0 / expm1((-0.5 * (((double) M_PI) * f)))))) / ((double) M_PI));
}
public static double code(double f) {
	return -4.0 * (Math.log(((1.0 / Math.expm1((0.5 * (Math.PI * f)))) - (1.0 / Math.expm1((-0.5 * (Math.PI * f)))))) / Math.PI);
}
def code(f):
	return -4.0 * (math.log(((1.0 / math.expm1((0.5 * (math.pi * f)))) - (1.0 / math.expm1((-0.5 * (math.pi * f)))))) / math.pi)
function code(f)
	return Float64(-4.0 * Float64(log(Float64(Float64(1.0 / expm1(Float64(0.5 * Float64(pi * f)))) - Float64(1.0 / expm1(Float64(-0.5 * Float64(pi * f)))))) / pi))
end
code[f_] := N[(-4.0 * N[(N[Log[N[(N[(1.0 / N[(Exp[N[(0.5 * N[(Pi * f), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]] - 1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(1.0 / N[(Exp[N[(-0.5 * N[(Pi * f), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]] - 1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / Pi), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
-4 \cdot \frac{\log \left(\frac{1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(0.5 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot f\right)\right)} - \frac{1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(-0.5 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot f\right)\right)}\right)}{\pi}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 6.3%

    \[-\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} + e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} - e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.6%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left(\frac{1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\left(\pi \cdot f\right) \cdot 0.5\right)} + \frac{-1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\left(\pi \cdot f\right) \cdot -0.5\right)}\right) \cdot \frac{-4}{\pi}} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Taylor expanded in f around inf 4.2%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \frac{\log \left(\frac{1}{e^{0.5 \cdot \left(f \cdot \pi\right)} - 1} - \frac{1}{e^{-0.5 \cdot \left(f \cdot \pi\right)} - 1}\right)}{\pi}} \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. expm1-define4.4%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \frac{\log \left(\frac{1}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(0.5 \cdot \left(f \cdot \pi\right)\right)}} - \frac{1}{e^{-0.5 \cdot \left(f \cdot \pi\right)} - 1}\right)}{\pi} \]
    2. *-commutative4.4%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \frac{\log \left(\frac{1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\left(f \cdot \pi\right) \cdot 0.5}\right)} - \frac{1}{e^{-0.5 \cdot \left(f \cdot \pi\right)} - 1}\right)}{\pi} \]
    3. expm1-define98.7%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \frac{\log \left(\frac{1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\left(f \cdot \pi\right) \cdot 0.5\right)} - \frac{1}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(-0.5 \cdot \left(f \cdot \pi\right)\right)}}\right)}{\pi} \]
    4. *-commutative98.7%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \frac{\log \left(\frac{1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\left(f \cdot \pi\right) \cdot 0.5\right)} - \frac{1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\left(f \cdot \pi\right) \cdot -0.5}\right)}\right)}{\pi} \]
  6. Simplified98.7%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \frac{\log \left(\frac{1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\left(f \cdot \pi\right) \cdot 0.5\right)} - \frac{1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\left(f \cdot \pi\right) \cdot -0.5\right)}\right)}{\pi}} \]
  7. Final simplification98.7%

    \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \frac{\log \left(\frac{1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(0.5 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot f\right)\right)} - \frac{1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(-0.5 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot f\right)\right)}\right)}{\pi} \]
  8. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 96.1% accurate, 2.3× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \log \left(\frac{1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(0.5 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot f\right)\right)} + \frac{f \cdot \left(0.5 - f \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.041666666666666664\right)\right) + 2 \cdot \frac{1}{\pi}}{f}\right) \cdot \frac{-4}{\pi} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (f)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  (log
   (+
    (/ 1.0 (expm1 (* 0.5 (* PI f))))
    (/
     (+ (* f (- 0.5 (* f (* PI -0.041666666666666664)))) (* 2.0 (/ 1.0 PI)))
     f)))
  (/ -4.0 PI)))
double code(double f) {
	return log(((1.0 / expm1((0.5 * (((double) M_PI) * f)))) + (((f * (0.5 - (f * (((double) M_PI) * -0.041666666666666664)))) + (2.0 * (1.0 / ((double) M_PI)))) / f))) * (-4.0 / ((double) M_PI));
}
public static double code(double f) {
	return Math.log(((1.0 / Math.expm1((0.5 * (Math.PI * f)))) + (((f * (0.5 - (f * (Math.PI * -0.041666666666666664)))) + (2.0 * (1.0 / Math.PI))) / f))) * (-4.0 / Math.PI);
}
def code(f):
	return math.log(((1.0 / math.expm1((0.5 * (math.pi * f)))) + (((f * (0.5 - (f * (math.pi * -0.041666666666666664)))) + (2.0 * (1.0 / math.pi))) / f))) * (-4.0 / math.pi)
function code(f)
	return Float64(log(Float64(Float64(1.0 / expm1(Float64(0.5 * Float64(pi * f)))) + Float64(Float64(Float64(f * Float64(0.5 - Float64(f * Float64(pi * -0.041666666666666664)))) + Float64(2.0 * Float64(1.0 / pi))) / f))) * Float64(-4.0 / pi))
end
code[f_] := N[(N[Log[N[(N[(1.0 / N[(Exp[N[(0.5 * N[(Pi * f), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]] - 1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(N[(f * N[(0.5 - N[(f * N[(Pi * -0.041666666666666664), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(2.0 * N[(1.0 / Pi), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / f), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[(-4.0 / Pi), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\log \left(\frac{1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(0.5 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot f\right)\right)} + \frac{f \cdot \left(0.5 - f \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.041666666666666664\right)\right) + 2 \cdot \frac{1}{\pi}}{f}\right) \cdot \frac{-4}{\pi}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 6.3%

    \[-\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} + e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} - e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.6%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left(\frac{1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\left(\pi \cdot f\right) \cdot 0.5\right)} + \frac{-1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\left(\pi \cdot f\right) \cdot -0.5\right)}\right) \cdot \frac{-4}{\pi}} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Taylor expanded in f around 0 97.0%

    \[\leadsto \log \left(\frac{1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\left(\pi \cdot f\right) \cdot 0.5\right)} + \color{blue}{\frac{f \cdot \left(0.5 + -1 \cdot \left(f \cdot \left(-0.125 \cdot \pi + 0.08333333333333333 \cdot \pi\right)\right)\right) + 2 \cdot \frac{1}{\pi}}{f}}\right) \cdot \frac{-4}{\pi} \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. distribute-rgt-out97.0%

      \[\leadsto \log \left(\frac{1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\left(\pi \cdot f\right) \cdot 0.5\right)} + \frac{f \cdot \left(0.5 + -1 \cdot \left(f \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot \left(-0.125 + 0.08333333333333333\right)\right)}\right)\right) + 2 \cdot \frac{1}{\pi}}{f}\right) \cdot \frac{-4}{\pi} \]
    2. metadata-eval97.0%

      \[\leadsto \log \left(\frac{1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\left(\pi \cdot f\right) \cdot 0.5\right)} + \frac{f \cdot \left(0.5 + -1 \cdot \left(f \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \color{blue}{-0.041666666666666664}\right)\right)\right) + 2 \cdot \frac{1}{\pi}}{f}\right) \cdot \frac{-4}{\pi} \]
  6. Applied egg-rr97.0%

    \[\leadsto \log \left(\frac{1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\left(\pi \cdot f\right) \cdot 0.5\right)} + \frac{f \cdot \left(0.5 + -1 \cdot \left(f \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot -0.041666666666666664\right)}\right)\right) + 2 \cdot \frac{1}{\pi}}{f}\right) \cdot \frac{-4}{\pi} \]
  7. Final simplification97.0%

    \[\leadsto \log \left(\frac{1}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(0.5 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot f\right)\right)} + \frac{f \cdot \left(0.5 - f \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.041666666666666664\right)\right) + 2 \cdot \frac{1}{\pi}}{f}\right) \cdot \frac{-4}{\pi} \]
  8. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 95.7% accurate, 4.8× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{\log \left(\frac{\frac{4}{\pi}}{f}\right)}{\pi \cdot \left(-0.25\right)} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (f) :precision binary64 (/ (log (/ (/ 4.0 PI) f)) (* PI (- 0.25))))
double code(double f) {
	return log(((4.0 / ((double) M_PI)) / f)) / (((double) M_PI) * -0.25);
}
public static double code(double f) {
	return Math.log(((4.0 / Math.PI) / f)) / (Math.PI * -0.25);
}
def code(f):
	return math.log(((4.0 / math.pi) / f)) / (math.pi * -0.25)
function code(f)
	return Float64(log(Float64(Float64(4.0 / pi) / f)) / Float64(pi * Float64(-0.25)))
end
function tmp = code(f)
	tmp = log(((4.0 / pi) / f)) / (pi * -0.25);
end
code[f_] := N[(N[Log[N[(N[(4.0 / Pi), $MachinePrecision] / f), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / N[(Pi * (-0.25)), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\frac{\log \left(\frac{\frac{4}{\pi}}{f}\right)}{\pi \cdot \left(-0.25\right)}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 6.3%

    \[-\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} + e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} - e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}\right) \]
  2. Add Preprocessing
  3. Taylor expanded in f around 0 96.6%

    \[\leadsto -\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{f \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot \frac{\pi}{0.25 \cdot \pi - -0.25 \cdot \pi} + 0.25 \cdot \frac{\pi}{0.25 \cdot \pi - -0.25 \cdot \pi}\right) + 2 \cdot \frac{1}{0.25 \cdot \pi - -0.25 \cdot \pi}}{f}\right)} \]
  4. Applied egg-rr96.8%

    \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\left(\frac{\log \left(\frac{2 \cdot \frac{2}{\pi}}{f}\right)}{\pi \cdot 0.25} + 0\right)} \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. add096.8%

      \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\frac{\log \left(\frac{2 \cdot \frac{2}{\pi}}{f}\right)}{\pi \cdot 0.25}} \]
    2. associate-*r/96.8%

      \[\leadsto -\frac{\log \left(\frac{\color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot 2}{\pi}}}{f}\right)}{\pi \cdot 0.25} \]
    3. metadata-eval96.8%

      \[\leadsto -\frac{\log \left(\frac{\frac{\color{blue}{4}}{\pi}}{f}\right)}{\pi \cdot 0.25} \]
  6. Simplified96.8%

    \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\frac{\log \left(\frac{\frac{4}{\pi}}{f}\right)}{\pi \cdot 0.25}} \]
  7. Final simplification96.8%

    \[\leadsto \frac{\log \left(\frac{\frac{4}{\pi}}{f}\right)}{\pi \cdot \left(-0.25\right)} \]
  8. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 0.7% accurate, 5.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 4 \cdot \frac{\log 0}{-\pi} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (f) :precision binary64 (* 4.0 (/ (log 0.0) (- PI))))
double code(double f) {
	return 4.0 * (log(0.0) / -((double) M_PI));
}
public static double code(double f) {
	return 4.0 * (Math.log(0.0) / -Math.PI);
}
def code(f):
	return 4.0 * (math.log(0.0) / -math.pi)
function code(f)
	return Float64(4.0 * Float64(log(0.0) / Float64(-pi)))
end
function tmp = code(f)
	tmp = 4.0 * (log(0.0) / -pi);
end
code[f_] := N[(4.0 * N[(N[Log[0.0], $MachinePrecision] / (-Pi)), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
4 \cdot \frac{\log 0}{-\pi}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 6.3%

    \[-\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} + e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} - e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}\right) \]
  2. Add Preprocessing
  3. Taylor expanded in f around 0 96.6%

    \[\leadsto -\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{f \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot \frac{\pi}{0.25 \cdot \pi - -0.25 \cdot \pi} + 0.25 \cdot \frac{\pi}{0.25 \cdot \pi - -0.25 \cdot \pi}\right) + 2 \cdot \frac{1}{0.25 \cdot \pi - -0.25 \cdot \pi}}{f}\right)} \]
  4. Taylor expanded in f around inf 0.7%

    \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{4 \cdot \frac{\log \left(-0.25 \cdot \frac{\pi}{0.25 \cdot \pi - -0.25 \cdot \pi} + 0.25 \cdot \frac{\pi}{0.25 \cdot \pi - -0.25 \cdot \pi}\right)}{\pi}} \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. distribute-rgt-out0.7%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{\pi}{0.25 \cdot \pi - -0.25 \cdot \pi} \cdot \left(-0.25 + 0.25\right)\right)}}{\pi} \]
    2. metadata-eval0.7%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \frac{\log \left(\frac{\pi}{0.25 \cdot \pi - -0.25 \cdot \pi} \cdot \color{blue}{0}\right)}{\pi} \]
    3. mul0-rgt0.7%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \frac{\log \color{blue}{0}}{\pi} \]
  6. Simplified0.7%

    \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{4 \cdot \frac{\log 0}{\pi}} \]
  7. Final simplification0.7%

    \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \frac{\log 0}{-\pi} \]
  8. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

?
herbie shell --seed 2024107 
(FPCore (f)
  :name "VandenBroeck and Keller, Equation (20)"
  :precision binary64
  (- (* (/ 1.0 (/ PI 4.0)) (log (/ (+ (exp (* (/ PI 4.0) f)) (exp (- (* (/ PI 4.0) f)))) (- (exp (* (/ PI 4.0) f)) (exp (- (* (/ PI 4.0) f)))))))))