Diagrams.TwoD.Apollonian:descartes from diagrams-contrib-1.3.0.5

Percentage Accurate: 69.9% → 96.7%
Time: 13.8s
Alternatives: 9
Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

?
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (* 2.0 (sqrt (+ (+ (* x y) (* x z)) (* y z)))))
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 2.0 * sqrt((((x * y) + (x * z)) + (y * z)));
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = 2.0d0 * sqrt((((x * y) + (x * z)) + (y * z)))
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 2.0 * Math.sqrt((((x * y) + (x * z)) + (y * z)));
}
def code(x, y, z):
	return 2.0 * math.sqrt((((x * y) + (x * z)) + (y * z)))
function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(x * z)) + Float64(y * z))))
end
function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((((x * y) + (x * z)) + (y * z)));
end
code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z}
\end{array}

Sampling outcomes in binary64 precision:

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 9 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 69.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (* 2.0 (sqrt (+ (+ (* x y) (* x z)) (* y z)))))
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 2.0 * sqrt((((x * y) + (x * z)) + (y * z)));
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = 2.0d0 * sqrt((((x * y) + (x * z)) + (y * z)))
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 2.0 * Math.sqrt((((x * y) + (x * z)) + (y * z)));
}
def code(x, y, z):
	return 2.0 * math.sqrt((((x * y) + (x * z)) + (y * z)))
function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(x * z)) + Float64(y * z))))
end
function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((((x * y) + (x * z)) + (y * z)));
end
code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z}
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 96.7% accurate, 0.3× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := 2 \cdot e^{\left(\log \left(\left(-z\right) - y\right) - \log \left(\frac{-1}{x}\right)\right) \cdot 0.5}\\ \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -2.3 \cdot 10^{+24}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq -5.3 \cdot 10^{-173}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z, y \cdot \left(z + x\right)\right)}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1.9 \cdot 10^{-292}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{x + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{y}{z}, y\right)} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* 2.0 (exp (* (- (log (- (- z) y)) (log (/ -1.0 x))) 0.5)))))
   (if (<= y -2.3e+24)
     t_0
     (if (<= y -5.3e-173)
       (* 2.0 (sqrt (fma x z (* y (+ z x)))))
       (if (<= y 1.9e-292)
         t_0
         (* 2.0 (* (sqrt (+ x (fma x (/ y z) y))) (sqrt z))))))))
assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = 2.0 * exp(((log((-z - y)) - log((-1.0 / x))) * 0.5));
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -2.3e+24) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (y <= -5.3e-173) {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt(fma(x, z, (y * (z + x))));
	} else if (y <= 1.9e-292) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * (sqrt((x + fma(x, (y / z), y))) * sqrt(z));
	}
	return tmp;
}
x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(2.0 * exp(Float64(Float64(log(Float64(Float64(-z) - y)) - log(Float64(-1.0 / x))) * 0.5)))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -2.3e+24)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (y <= -5.3e-173)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(fma(x, z, Float64(y * Float64(z + x)))));
	elseif (y <= 1.9e-292)
		tmp = t_0;
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(sqrt(Float64(x + fma(x, Float64(y / z), y))) * sqrt(z)));
	end
	return tmp
end
NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(2.0 * N[Exp[N[(N[(N[Log[N[((-z) - y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Log[N[(-1.0 / x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[y, -2.3e+24], t$95$0, If[LessEqual[y, -5.3e-173], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(x * z + N[(y * N[(z + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, 1.9e-292], t$95$0, N[(2.0 * N[(N[Sqrt[N[(x + N[(x * N[(y / z), $MachinePrecision] + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[Sqrt[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]]
\begin{array}{l}
[x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\
\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := 2 \cdot e^{\left(\log \left(\left(-z\right) - y\right) - \log \left(\frac{-1}{x}\right)\right) \cdot 0.5}\\
\mathbf{if}\;y \leq -2.3 \cdot 10^{+24}:\\
\;\;\;\;t\_0\\

\mathbf{elif}\;y \leq -5.3 \cdot 10^{-173}:\\
\;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z, y \cdot \left(z + x\right)\right)}\\

\mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1.9 \cdot 10^{-292}:\\
\;\;\;\;t\_0\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{x + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{y}{z}, y\right)} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 3 regimes
  2. if y < -2.2999999999999999e24 or -5.29999999999999964e-173 < y < 1.9000000000000001e-292

    1. Initial program 54.7%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-+l+54.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      2. *-commutative54.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)} \]
      3. *-commutative54.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]
      4. *-commutative54.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(z \cdot x + \color{blue}{z \cdot y}\right)} \]
      5. +-commutative54.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right)}} \]
      6. +-commutative54.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right) + y \cdot x}} \]
      7. associate-+l+54.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot y + \left(z \cdot x + y \cdot x\right)}} \]
      8. *-commutative54.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot z} + y \cdot x\right)} \]
      9. *-commutative54.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + \color{blue}{x \cdot y}\right)} \]
      10. +-commutative54.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right) + z \cdot y}} \]
      11. +-commutative54.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right)} + z \cdot y} \]
      12. *-commutative54.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + \color{blue}{y \cdot z}} \]
      13. associate-+l+54.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      14. +-commutative54.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]
      15. distribute-rgt-in54.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
    3. Simplified54.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Step-by-step derivation
      1. pow1/254.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)\right)}^{0.5}} \]
      2. pow-to-exp50.9%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{e^{\log \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)\right) \cdot 0.5}} \]
      3. distribute-rgt-in50.9%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot e^{\log \left(x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}\right) \cdot 0.5} \]
      4. associate-+r+50.9%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot e^{\log \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot y + y \cdot z\right) + x \cdot z\right)} \cdot 0.5} \]
      5. *-commutative50.9%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot e^{\log \left(\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right) + x \cdot z\right) \cdot 0.5} \]
      6. distribute-lft-in50.9%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot e^{\log \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + z\right)} + x \cdot z\right) \cdot 0.5} \]
      7. fma-define51.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot e^{\log \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x + z, x \cdot z\right)\right)} \cdot 0.5} \]
    6. Applied egg-rr51.0%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{e^{\log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x + z, x \cdot z\right)\right) \cdot 0.5}} \]
    7. Taylor expanded in x around -inf 45.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot e^{\color{blue}{\left(\log \left(-1 \cdot y + -1 \cdot z\right) + -1 \cdot \log \left(\frac{-1}{x}\right)\right)} \cdot 0.5} \]
    8. Step-by-step derivation
      1. mul-1-neg45.2%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot e^{\left(\log \left(-1 \cdot y + -1 \cdot z\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-\log \left(\frac{-1}{x}\right)\right)}\right) \cdot 0.5} \]
      2. unsub-neg45.2%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot e^{\color{blue}{\left(\log \left(-1 \cdot y + -1 \cdot z\right) - \log \left(\frac{-1}{x}\right)\right)} \cdot 0.5} \]
      3. +-commutative45.2%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot e^{\left(\log \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot z + -1 \cdot y\right)} - \log \left(\frac{-1}{x}\right)\right) \cdot 0.5} \]
      4. mul-1-neg45.2%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot e^{\left(\log \left(-1 \cdot z + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)}\right) - \log \left(\frac{-1}{x}\right)\right) \cdot 0.5} \]
      5. unsub-neg45.2%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot e^{\left(\log \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot z - y\right)} - \log \left(\frac{-1}{x}\right)\right) \cdot 0.5} \]
      6. neg-mul-145.2%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot e^{\left(\log \left(\color{blue}{\left(-z\right)} - y\right) - \log \left(\frac{-1}{x}\right)\right) \cdot 0.5} \]
    9. Simplified45.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot e^{\color{blue}{\left(\log \left(\left(-z\right) - y\right) - \log \left(\frac{-1}{x}\right)\right)} \cdot 0.5} \]

    if -2.2999999999999999e24 < y < -5.29999999999999964e-173

    1. Initial program 84.5%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-+l+84.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      2. *-commutative84.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)} \]
      3. *-commutative84.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]
      4. *-commutative84.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(z \cdot x + \color{blue}{z \cdot y}\right)} \]
      5. +-commutative84.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right)}} \]
      6. +-commutative84.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right) + y \cdot x}} \]
      7. +-commutative84.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot x + \left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right)}} \]
      8. *-commutative84.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot z} + z \cdot x\right)} \]
      9. *-commutative84.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(y \cdot z + \color{blue}{x \cdot z}\right)} \]
      10. associate-+l+84.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot x + y \cdot z\right) + x \cdot z}} \]
      11. +-commutative84.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot z + \left(y \cdot x + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      12. fma-define84.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z, y \cdot x + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      13. distribute-lft-out84.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z, \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + z\right)}\right)} \]
    3. Simplified84.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z, y \cdot \left(x + z\right)\right)}} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing

    if 1.9000000000000001e-292 < y

    1. Initial program 66.5%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-+l+66.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      2. *-commutative66.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)} \]
      3. *-commutative66.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]
      4. *-commutative66.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(z \cdot x + \color{blue}{z \cdot y}\right)} \]
      5. +-commutative66.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right)}} \]
      6. +-commutative66.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right) + y \cdot x}} \]
      7. associate-+l+66.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot y + \left(z \cdot x + y \cdot x\right)}} \]
      8. *-commutative66.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot z} + y \cdot x\right)} \]
      9. *-commutative66.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + \color{blue}{x \cdot y}\right)} \]
      10. +-commutative66.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right) + z \cdot y}} \]
      11. +-commutative66.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right)} + z \cdot y} \]
      12. *-commutative66.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + \color{blue}{y \cdot z}} \]
      13. associate-+l+66.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      14. +-commutative66.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]
      15. distribute-rgt-in66.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
    3. Simplified66.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 52.8%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(x + \left(y + \frac{x \cdot y}{z}\right)\right)}} \]
    6. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-/l*50.8%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot \left(x + \left(y + \color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{y}{z}}\right)\right)} \]
    7. Simplified50.8%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(x + \left(y + x \cdot \frac{y}{z}\right)\right)}} \]
    8. Step-by-step derivation
      1. *-commutative50.8%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x + \left(y + x \cdot \frac{y}{z}\right)\right) \cdot z}} \]
      2. sqrt-prod47.1%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{x + \left(y + x \cdot \frac{y}{z}\right)} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)} \]
      3. +-commutative47.1%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{x + \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \frac{y}{z} + y\right)}} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right) \]
      4. fma-define47.1%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{x + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{y}{z}, y\right)}} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right) \]
    9. Applied egg-rr47.1%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{x + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{y}{z}, y\right)} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)} \]
  3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification52.2%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -2.3 \cdot 10^{+24}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot e^{\left(\log \left(\left(-z\right) - y\right) - \log \left(\frac{-1}{x}\right)\right) \cdot 0.5}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq -5.3 \cdot 10^{-173}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z, y \cdot \left(z + x\right)\right)}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1.9 \cdot 10^{-292}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot e^{\left(\log \left(\left(-z\right) - y\right) - \log \left(\frac{-1}{x}\right)\right) \cdot 0.5}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{x + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{y}{z}, y\right)} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 84.0% accurate, 0.4× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 4.4 \cdot 10^{-263}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{x + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{y}{z}, y\right)} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 4.4e-263)
   (* 2.0 (sqrt (* x (+ y z))))
   (* 2.0 (* (sqrt (+ x (fma x (/ y z) y))) (sqrt z)))))
assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 4.4e-263) {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((x * (y + z)));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * (sqrt((x + fma(x, (y / z), y))) * sqrt(z));
	}
	return tmp;
}
x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 4.4e-263)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(x * Float64(y + z))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(sqrt(Float64(x + fma(x, Float64(y / z), y))) * sqrt(z)));
	end
	return tmp
end
NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, 4.4e-263], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(x * N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[(N[Sqrt[N[(x + N[(x * N[(y / z), $MachinePrecision] + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[Sqrt[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}
[x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\
\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;y \leq 4.4 \cdot 10^{-263}:\\
\;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{x + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{y}{z}, y\right)} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if y < 4.4000000000000001e-263

    1. Initial program 65.0%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-+l+65.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      2. *-commutative65.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)} \]
      3. *-commutative65.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]
      4. *-commutative65.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(z \cdot x + \color{blue}{z \cdot y}\right)} \]
      5. +-commutative65.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right)}} \]
      6. +-commutative65.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right) + y \cdot x}} \]
      7. associate-+l+65.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot y + \left(z \cdot x + y \cdot x\right)}} \]
      8. *-commutative65.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot z} + y \cdot x\right)} \]
      9. *-commutative65.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + \color{blue}{x \cdot y}\right)} \]
      10. +-commutative65.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right) + z \cdot y}} \]
      11. +-commutative65.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right)} + z \cdot y} \]
      12. *-commutative65.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + \color{blue}{y \cdot z}} \]
      13. associate-+l+65.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      14. +-commutative65.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]
      15. distribute-rgt-in65.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
    3. Simplified65.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 42.1%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}} \]

    if 4.4000000000000001e-263 < y

    1. Initial program 65.7%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-+l+65.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      2. *-commutative65.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)} \]
      3. *-commutative65.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]
      4. *-commutative65.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(z \cdot x + \color{blue}{z \cdot y}\right)} \]
      5. +-commutative65.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right)}} \]
      6. +-commutative65.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right) + y \cdot x}} \]
      7. associate-+l+65.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot y + \left(z \cdot x + y \cdot x\right)}} \]
      8. *-commutative65.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot z} + y \cdot x\right)} \]
      9. *-commutative65.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + \color{blue}{x \cdot y}\right)} \]
      10. +-commutative65.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right) + z \cdot y}} \]
      11. +-commutative65.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right)} + z \cdot y} \]
      12. *-commutative65.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + \color{blue}{y \cdot z}} \]
      13. associate-+l+65.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      14. +-commutative65.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]
      15. distribute-rgt-in65.8%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
    3. Simplified65.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 51.7%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(x + \left(y + \frac{x \cdot y}{z}\right)\right)}} \]
    6. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-/l*49.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot \left(x + \left(y + \color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{y}{z}}\right)\right)} \]
    7. Simplified49.6%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(x + \left(y + x \cdot \frac{y}{z}\right)\right)}} \]
    8. Step-by-step derivation
      1. *-commutative49.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x + \left(y + x \cdot \frac{y}{z}\right)\right) \cdot z}} \]
      2. sqrt-prod46.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{x + \left(y + x \cdot \frac{y}{z}\right)} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)} \]
      3. +-commutative46.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{x + \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \frac{y}{z} + y\right)}} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right) \]
      4. fma-define46.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{x + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{y}{z}, y\right)}} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right) \]
    9. Applied egg-rr46.7%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{x + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{y}{z}, y\right)} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 83.9% accurate, 0.5× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 7 \cdot 10^{-262}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{z} \cdot \sqrt{y + x}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 7e-262)
   (* 2.0 (sqrt (* x (+ y z))))
   (* 2.0 (* (sqrt z) (sqrt (+ y x))))))
assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 7e-262) {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((x * (y + z)));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * (sqrt(z) * sqrt((y + x)));
	}
	return tmp;
}
NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 7d-262) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * sqrt((x * (y + z)))
    else
        tmp = 2.0d0 * (sqrt(z) * sqrt((y + x)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
assert x < y && y < z;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 7e-262) {
		tmp = 2.0 * Math.sqrt((x * (y + z)));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * (Math.sqrt(z) * Math.sqrt((y + x)));
	}
	return tmp;
}
[x, y, z] = sort([x, y, z])
def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 7e-262:
		tmp = 2.0 * math.sqrt((x * (y + z)))
	else:
		tmp = 2.0 * (math.sqrt(z) * math.sqrt((y + x)))
	return tmp
x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 7e-262)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(x * Float64(y + z))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(sqrt(z) * sqrt(Float64(y + x))));
	end
	return tmp
end
x, y, z = num2cell(sort([x, y, z])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 7e-262)
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((x * (y + z)));
	else
		tmp = 2.0 * (sqrt(z) * sqrt((y + x)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, 7e-262], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(x * N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[(N[Sqrt[z], $MachinePrecision] * N[Sqrt[N[(y + x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}
[x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\
\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;y \leq 7 \cdot 10^{-262}:\\
\;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{z} \cdot \sqrt{y + x}\right)\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if y < 7.00000000000000023e-262

    1. Initial program 65.0%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-+l+65.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      2. *-commutative65.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)} \]
      3. *-commutative65.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]
      4. *-commutative65.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(z \cdot x + \color{blue}{z \cdot y}\right)} \]
      5. +-commutative65.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right)}} \]
      6. +-commutative65.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right) + y \cdot x}} \]
      7. associate-+l+65.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot y + \left(z \cdot x + y \cdot x\right)}} \]
      8. *-commutative65.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot z} + y \cdot x\right)} \]
      9. *-commutative65.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + \color{blue}{x \cdot y}\right)} \]
      10. +-commutative65.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right) + z \cdot y}} \]
      11. +-commutative65.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right)} + z \cdot y} \]
      12. *-commutative65.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + \color{blue}{y \cdot z}} \]
      13. associate-+l+65.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      14. +-commutative65.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]
      15. distribute-rgt-in65.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
    3. Simplified65.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 42.1%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}} \]

    if 7.00000000000000023e-262 < y

    1. Initial program 65.7%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-+l+65.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      2. *-commutative65.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)} \]
      3. *-commutative65.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]
      4. *-commutative65.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(z \cdot x + \color{blue}{z \cdot y}\right)} \]
      5. +-commutative65.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right)}} \]
      6. +-commutative65.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right) + y \cdot x}} \]
      7. associate-+l+65.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot y + \left(z \cdot x + y \cdot x\right)}} \]
      8. *-commutative65.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot z} + y \cdot x\right)} \]
      9. *-commutative65.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + \color{blue}{x \cdot y}\right)} \]
      10. +-commutative65.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right) + z \cdot y}} \]
      11. +-commutative65.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right)} + z \cdot y} \]
      12. *-commutative65.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + \color{blue}{y \cdot z}} \]
      13. associate-+l+65.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      14. +-commutative65.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]
      15. distribute-rgt-in65.8%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
    3. Simplified65.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 39.5%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{z \cdot \left(x + y\right)}} \]
    6. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative39.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)}} \]
    7. Simplified39.5%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
    8. Step-by-step derivation
      1. *-commutative39.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(y + x\right) \cdot z}} \]
      2. sqrt-prod41.9%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{y + x} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)} \]
    9. Applied egg-rr41.9%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{y + x} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification42.0%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 7 \cdot 10^{-262}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{z} \cdot \sqrt{y + x}\right)\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 82.7% accurate, 0.5× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 1.45 \cdot 10^{-261}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{z} \cdot \sqrt{y}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 1.45e-261)
   (* 2.0 (sqrt (* x (+ y z))))
   (* 2.0 (* (sqrt z) (sqrt y)))))
assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 1.45e-261) {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((x * (y + z)));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * (sqrt(z) * sqrt(y));
	}
	return tmp;
}
NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 1.45d-261) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * sqrt((x * (y + z)))
    else
        tmp = 2.0d0 * (sqrt(z) * sqrt(y))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
assert x < y && y < z;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 1.45e-261) {
		tmp = 2.0 * Math.sqrt((x * (y + z)));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * (Math.sqrt(z) * Math.sqrt(y));
	}
	return tmp;
}
[x, y, z] = sort([x, y, z])
def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 1.45e-261:
		tmp = 2.0 * math.sqrt((x * (y + z)))
	else:
		tmp = 2.0 * (math.sqrt(z) * math.sqrt(y))
	return tmp
x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 1.45e-261)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(x * Float64(y + z))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(sqrt(z) * sqrt(y)));
	end
	return tmp
end
x, y, z = num2cell(sort([x, y, z])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 1.45e-261)
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((x * (y + z)));
	else
		tmp = 2.0 * (sqrt(z) * sqrt(y));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, 1.45e-261], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(x * N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[(N[Sqrt[z], $MachinePrecision] * N[Sqrt[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}
[x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\
\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;y \leq 1.45 \cdot 10^{-261}:\\
\;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{z} \cdot \sqrt{y}\right)\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if y < 1.44999999999999993e-261

    1. Initial program 65.0%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-+l+65.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      2. *-commutative65.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)} \]
      3. *-commutative65.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]
      4. *-commutative65.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(z \cdot x + \color{blue}{z \cdot y}\right)} \]
      5. +-commutative65.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right)}} \]
      6. +-commutative65.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right) + y \cdot x}} \]
      7. associate-+l+65.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot y + \left(z \cdot x + y \cdot x\right)}} \]
      8. *-commutative65.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot z} + y \cdot x\right)} \]
      9. *-commutative65.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + \color{blue}{x \cdot y}\right)} \]
      10. +-commutative65.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right) + z \cdot y}} \]
      11. +-commutative65.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right)} + z \cdot y} \]
      12. *-commutative65.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + \color{blue}{y \cdot z}} \]
      13. associate-+l+65.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      14. +-commutative65.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]
      15. distribute-rgt-in65.0%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
    3. Simplified65.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 42.1%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}} \]

    if 1.44999999999999993e-261 < y

    1. Initial program 65.7%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-+l+65.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      2. *-commutative65.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)} \]
      3. *-commutative65.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]
      4. *-commutative65.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(z \cdot x + \color{blue}{z \cdot y}\right)} \]
      5. +-commutative65.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right)}} \]
      6. +-commutative65.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right) + y \cdot x}} \]
      7. associate-+l+65.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot y + \left(z \cdot x + y \cdot x\right)}} \]
      8. *-commutative65.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot z} + y \cdot x\right)} \]
      9. *-commutative65.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + \color{blue}{x \cdot y}\right)} \]
      10. +-commutative65.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right) + z \cdot y}} \]
      11. +-commutative65.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right)} + z \cdot y} \]
      12. *-commutative65.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + \color{blue}{y \cdot z}} \]
      13. associate-+l+65.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      14. +-commutative65.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]
      15. distribute-rgt-in65.8%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
    3. Simplified65.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Step-by-step derivation
      1. add-sqr-sqrt65.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{\sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \cdot \sqrt{\sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}}\right)} \]
      2. pow265.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt{\sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}}\right)}^{2}} \]
      3. pow1/265.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left(\sqrt{\color{blue}{{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)\right)}^{0.5}}}\right)}^{2} \]
      4. sqrt-pow165.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\color{blue}{\left({\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)\right)}^{\left(\frac{0.5}{2}\right)}\right)}}^{2} \]
      5. distribute-rgt-in65.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left({\left(x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}\right)}^{\left(\frac{0.5}{2}\right)}\right)}^{2} \]
      6. associate-+r+65.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left({\color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot y + y \cdot z\right) + x \cdot z\right)}}^{\left(\frac{0.5}{2}\right)}\right)}^{2} \]
      7. *-commutative65.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left({\left(\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right) + x \cdot z\right)}^{\left(\frac{0.5}{2}\right)}\right)}^{2} \]
      8. distribute-lft-in65.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left({\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + z\right)} + x \cdot z\right)}^{\left(\frac{0.5}{2}\right)}\right)}^{2} \]
      9. fma-define65.4%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left({\color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x + z, x \cdot z\right)\right)}}^{\left(\frac{0.5}{2}\right)}\right)}^{2} \]
      10. metadata-eval65.4%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left({\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x + z, x \cdot z\right)\right)}^{\color{blue}{0.25}}\right)}^{2} \]
    6. Applied egg-rr65.4%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{{\left({\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x + z, x \cdot z\right)\right)}^{0.25}\right)}^{2}} \]
    7. Taylor expanded in x around 0 18.6%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{y \cdot z}} \]
    8. Step-by-step derivation
      1. *-commutative18.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot y}} \]
    9. Simplified18.6%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{z \cdot y}} \]
    10. Step-by-step derivation
      1. sqrt-prod26.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{z} \cdot \sqrt{y}\right)} \]
    11. Applied egg-rr26.5%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{z} \cdot \sqrt{y}\right)} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 69.7% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 1.5 \cdot 10^{-261}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 1.5e-261)
   (* 2.0 (sqrt (* x (+ y z))))
   (* 2.0 (sqrt (* z (+ y x))))))
assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 1.5e-261) {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((x * (y + z)));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((z * (y + x)));
	}
	return tmp;
}
NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 1.5d-261) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * sqrt((x * (y + z)))
    else
        tmp = 2.0d0 * sqrt((z * (y + x)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
assert x < y && y < z;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 1.5e-261) {
		tmp = 2.0 * Math.sqrt((x * (y + z)));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * Math.sqrt((z * (y + x)));
	}
	return tmp;
}
[x, y, z] = sort([x, y, z])
def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 1.5e-261:
		tmp = 2.0 * math.sqrt((x * (y + z)))
	else:
		tmp = 2.0 * math.sqrt((z * (y + x)))
	return tmp
x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 1.5e-261)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(x * Float64(y + z))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(z * Float64(y + x))));
	end
	return tmp
end
x, y, z = num2cell(sort([x, y, z])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 1.5e-261)
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((x * (y + z)));
	else
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((z * (y + x)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, 1.5e-261], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(x * N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(z * N[(y + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}
[x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\
\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;y \leq 1.5 \cdot 10^{-261}:\\
\;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if y < 1.5e-261

    1. Initial program 64.5%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-+l+64.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      2. *-commutative64.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)} \]
      3. *-commutative64.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]
      4. *-commutative64.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(z \cdot x + \color{blue}{z \cdot y}\right)} \]
      5. +-commutative64.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right)}} \]
      6. +-commutative64.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right) + y \cdot x}} \]
      7. associate-+l+64.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot y + \left(z \cdot x + y \cdot x\right)}} \]
      8. *-commutative64.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot z} + y \cdot x\right)} \]
      9. *-commutative64.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + \color{blue}{x \cdot y}\right)} \]
      10. +-commutative64.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right) + z \cdot y}} \]
      11. +-commutative64.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right)} + z \cdot y} \]
      12. *-commutative64.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + \color{blue}{y \cdot z}} \]
      13. associate-+l+64.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      14. +-commutative64.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]
      15. distribute-rgt-in64.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
    3. Simplified64.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 41.8%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}} \]

    if 1.5e-261 < y

    1. Initial program 66.2%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-+l+66.2%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      2. *-commutative66.2%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)} \]
      3. *-commutative66.2%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]
      4. *-commutative66.2%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(z \cdot x + \color{blue}{z \cdot y}\right)} \]
      5. +-commutative66.2%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right)}} \]
      6. +-commutative66.2%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right) + y \cdot x}} \]
      7. associate-+l+66.2%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot y + \left(z \cdot x + y \cdot x\right)}} \]
      8. *-commutative66.2%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot z} + y \cdot x\right)} \]
      9. *-commutative66.2%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + \color{blue}{x \cdot y}\right)} \]
      10. +-commutative66.2%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right) + z \cdot y}} \]
      11. +-commutative66.2%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right)} + z \cdot y} \]
      12. *-commutative66.2%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + \color{blue}{y \cdot z}} \]
      13. associate-+l+66.2%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      14. +-commutative66.2%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]
      15. distribute-rgt-in66.2%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
    3. Simplified66.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 39.7%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{z \cdot \left(x + y\right)}} \]
    6. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative39.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)}} \]
    7. Simplified39.7%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 68.6% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 2 \cdot 10^{-259}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot z}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 2e-259) (* 2.0 (sqrt (* x (+ y z)))) (* 2.0 (sqrt (* y z)))))
assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 2e-259) {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((x * (y + z)));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((y * z));
	}
	return tmp;
}
NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 2d-259) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * sqrt((x * (y + z)))
    else
        tmp = 2.0d0 * sqrt((y * z))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
assert x < y && y < z;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 2e-259) {
		tmp = 2.0 * Math.sqrt((x * (y + z)));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * Math.sqrt((y * z));
	}
	return tmp;
}
[x, y, z] = sort([x, y, z])
def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 2e-259:
		tmp = 2.0 * math.sqrt((x * (y + z)))
	else:
		tmp = 2.0 * math.sqrt((y * z))
	return tmp
x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 2e-259)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(x * Float64(y + z))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(y * z)));
	end
	return tmp
end
x, y, z = num2cell(sort([x, y, z])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 2e-259)
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((x * (y + z)));
	else
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((y * z));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, 2e-259], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(x * N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}
[x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\
\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;y \leq 2 \cdot 10^{-259}:\\
\;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot z}\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if y < 2.0000000000000001e-259

    1. Initial program 64.5%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-+l+64.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      2. *-commutative64.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)} \]
      3. *-commutative64.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]
      4. *-commutative64.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(z \cdot x + \color{blue}{z \cdot y}\right)} \]
      5. +-commutative64.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right)}} \]
      6. +-commutative64.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right) + y \cdot x}} \]
      7. associate-+l+64.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot y + \left(z \cdot x + y \cdot x\right)}} \]
      8. *-commutative64.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot z} + y \cdot x\right)} \]
      9. *-commutative64.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + \color{blue}{x \cdot y}\right)} \]
      10. +-commutative64.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right) + z \cdot y}} \]
      11. +-commutative64.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right)} + z \cdot y} \]
      12. *-commutative64.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + \color{blue}{y \cdot z}} \]
      13. associate-+l+64.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      14. +-commutative64.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]
      15. distribute-rgt-in64.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
    3. Simplified64.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 41.8%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}} \]

    if 2.0000000000000001e-259 < y

    1. Initial program 66.2%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-+l+66.2%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      2. *-commutative66.2%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)} \]
      3. *-commutative66.2%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]
      4. *-commutative66.2%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(z \cdot x + \color{blue}{z \cdot y}\right)} \]
      5. +-commutative66.2%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right)}} \]
      6. +-commutative66.2%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right) + y \cdot x}} \]
      7. associate-+l+66.2%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot y + \left(z \cdot x + y \cdot x\right)}} \]
      8. *-commutative66.2%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot z} + y \cdot x\right)} \]
      9. *-commutative66.2%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + \color{blue}{x \cdot y}\right)} \]
      10. +-commutative66.2%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right) + z \cdot y}} \]
      11. +-commutative66.2%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right)} + z \cdot y} \]
      12. *-commutative66.2%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + \color{blue}{y \cdot z}} \]
      13. associate-+l+66.2%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      14. +-commutative66.2%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]
      15. distribute-rgt-in66.2%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
    3. Simplified66.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Step-by-step derivation
      1. add-sqr-sqrt65.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{\sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \cdot \sqrt{\sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}}\right)} \]
      2. pow265.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt{\sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}}\right)}^{2}} \]
      3. pow1/265.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left(\sqrt{\color{blue}{{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)\right)}^{0.5}}}\right)}^{2} \]
      4. sqrt-pow165.8%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\color{blue}{\left({\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)\right)}^{\left(\frac{0.5}{2}\right)}\right)}}^{2} \]
      5. distribute-rgt-in65.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left({\left(x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}\right)}^{\left(\frac{0.5}{2}\right)}\right)}^{2} \]
      6. associate-+r+65.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left({\color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot y + y \cdot z\right) + x \cdot z\right)}}^{\left(\frac{0.5}{2}\right)}\right)}^{2} \]
      7. *-commutative65.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left({\left(\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right) + x \cdot z\right)}^{\left(\frac{0.5}{2}\right)}\right)}^{2} \]
      8. distribute-lft-in65.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left({\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + z\right)} + x \cdot z\right)}^{\left(\frac{0.5}{2}\right)}\right)}^{2} \]
      9. fma-define65.9%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left({\color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x + z, x \cdot z\right)\right)}}^{\left(\frac{0.5}{2}\right)}\right)}^{2} \]
      10. metadata-eval65.9%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left({\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x + z, x \cdot z\right)\right)}^{\color{blue}{0.25}}\right)}^{2} \]
    6. Applied egg-rr65.9%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{{\left({\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x + z, x \cdot z\right)\right)}^{0.25}\right)}^{2}} \]
    7. Taylor expanded in x around 0 18.7%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{y \cdot z}} \]
    8. Step-by-step derivation
      1. *-commutative18.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot y}} \]
    9. Simplified18.7%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{z \cdot y}} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification30.2%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 2 \cdot 10^{-259}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot z}\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 69.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)} \end{array} \]
NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* 2.0 (sqrt (+ (* y x) (* z (+ y x))))))
assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 2.0 * sqrt(((y * x) + (z * (y + x))));
}
NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = 2.0d0 * sqrt(((y * x) + (z * (y + x))))
end function
assert x < y && y < z;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 2.0 * Math.sqrt(((y * x) + (z * (y + x))));
}
[x, y, z] = sort([x, y, z])
def code(x, y, z):
	return 2.0 * math.sqrt(((y * x) + (z * (y + x))))
x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(Float64(y * x) + Float64(z * Float64(y + x)))))
end
x, y, z = num2cell(sort([x, y, z])){:}
function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 2.0 * sqrt(((y * x) + (z * (y + x))));
end
NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * N[(y + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}
[x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\
\\
2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 65.4%

    \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate-+l+65.4%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
    2. *-commutative65.4%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)} \]
    3. *-commutative65.4%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]
    4. *-commutative65.4%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(z \cdot x + \color{blue}{z \cdot y}\right)} \]
    5. +-commutative65.4%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right)}} \]
    6. +-commutative65.4%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right) + y \cdot x}} \]
    7. associate-+l+65.4%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot y + \left(z \cdot x + y \cdot x\right)}} \]
    8. *-commutative65.4%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot z} + y \cdot x\right)} \]
    9. *-commutative65.4%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + \color{blue}{x \cdot y}\right)} \]
    10. +-commutative65.4%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right) + z \cdot y}} \]
    11. +-commutative65.4%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right)} + z \cdot y} \]
    12. *-commutative65.4%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + \color{blue}{y \cdot z}} \]
    13. associate-+l+65.4%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
    14. +-commutative65.4%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]
    15. distribute-rgt-in65.4%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
  3. Simplified65.4%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
  4. Add Preprocessing
  5. Final simplification65.4%

    \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)} \]
  6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 67.6% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 1.5 \cdot 10^{-261}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot z}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 1.5e-261) (* 2.0 (sqrt (* y x))) (* 2.0 (sqrt (* y z)))))
assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 1.5e-261) {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((y * x));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((y * z));
	}
	return tmp;
}
NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 1.5d-261) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * sqrt((y * x))
    else
        tmp = 2.0d0 * sqrt((y * z))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
assert x < y && y < z;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 1.5e-261) {
		tmp = 2.0 * Math.sqrt((y * x));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * Math.sqrt((y * z));
	}
	return tmp;
}
[x, y, z] = sort([x, y, z])
def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 1.5e-261:
		tmp = 2.0 * math.sqrt((y * x))
	else:
		tmp = 2.0 * math.sqrt((y * z))
	return tmp
x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 1.5e-261)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(y * x)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(y * z)));
	end
	return tmp
end
x, y, z = num2cell(sort([x, y, z])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 1.5e-261)
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((y * x));
	else
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((y * z));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, 1.5e-261], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}
[x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\
\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;y \leq 1.5 \cdot 10^{-261}:\\
\;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x}\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot z}\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if y < 1.5e-261

    1. Initial program 64.5%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-+l+64.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      2. *-commutative64.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)} \]
      3. *-commutative64.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]
      4. *-commutative64.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(z \cdot x + \color{blue}{z \cdot y}\right)} \]
      5. +-commutative64.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right)}} \]
      6. +-commutative64.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right) + y \cdot x}} \]
      7. associate-+l+64.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot y + \left(z \cdot x + y \cdot x\right)}} \]
      8. *-commutative64.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot z} + y \cdot x\right)} \]
      9. *-commutative64.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + \color{blue}{x \cdot y}\right)} \]
      10. +-commutative64.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right) + z \cdot y}} \]
      11. +-commutative64.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right)} + z \cdot y} \]
      12. *-commutative64.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + \color{blue}{y \cdot z}} \]
      13. associate-+l+64.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      14. +-commutative64.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]
      15. distribute-rgt-in64.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
    3. Simplified64.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 15.4%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{x \cdot y}} \]
    6. Step-by-step derivation
      1. *-commutative15.4%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot x}} \]
    7. Simplified15.4%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{y \cdot x}} \]

    if 1.5e-261 < y

    1. Initial program 66.2%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-+l+66.2%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      2. *-commutative66.2%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)} \]
      3. *-commutative66.2%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]
      4. *-commutative66.2%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(z \cdot x + \color{blue}{z \cdot y}\right)} \]
      5. +-commutative66.2%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right)}} \]
      6. +-commutative66.2%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right) + y \cdot x}} \]
      7. associate-+l+66.2%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot y + \left(z \cdot x + y \cdot x\right)}} \]
      8. *-commutative66.2%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot z} + y \cdot x\right)} \]
      9. *-commutative66.2%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + \color{blue}{x \cdot y}\right)} \]
      10. +-commutative66.2%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right) + z \cdot y}} \]
      11. +-commutative66.2%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right)} + z \cdot y} \]
      12. *-commutative66.2%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + \color{blue}{y \cdot z}} \]
      13. associate-+l+66.2%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      14. +-commutative66.2%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]
      15. distribute-rgt-in66.2%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
    3. Simplified66.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Step-by-step derivation
      1. add-sqr-sqrt65.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{\sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \cdot \sqrt{\sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}}\right)} \]
      2. pow265.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt{\sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}}\right)}^{2}} \]
      3. pow1/265.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left(\sqrt{\color{blue}{{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)\right)}^{0.5}}}\right)}^{2} \]
      4. sqrt-pow165.8%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\color{blue}{\left({\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)\right)}^{\left(\frac{0.5}{2}\right)}\right)}}^{2} \]
      5. distribute-rgt-in65.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left({\left(x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}\right)}^{\left(\frac{0.5}{2}\right)}\right)}^{2} \]
      6. associate-+r+65.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left({\color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot y + y \cdot z\right) + x \cdot z\right)}}^{\left(\frac{0.5}{2}\right)}\right)}^{2} \]
      7. *-commutative65.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left({\left(\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right) + x \cdot z\right)}^{\left(\frac{0.5}{2}\right)}\right)}^{2} \]
      8. distribute-lft-in65.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left({\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + z\right)} + x \cdot z\right)}^{\left(\frac{0.5}{2}\right)}\right)}^{2} \]
      9. fma-define65.9%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left({\color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x + z, x \cdot z\right)\right)}}^{\left(\frac{0.5}{2}\right)}\right)}^{2} \]
      10. metadata-eval65.9%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left({\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x + z, x \cdot z\right)\right)}^{\color{blue}{0.25}}\right)}^{2} \]
    6. Applied egg-rr65.9%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{{\left({\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x + z, x \cdot z\right)\right)}^{0.25}\right)}^{2}} \]
    7. Taylor expanded in x around 0 18.7%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{y \cdot z}} \]
    8. Step-by-step derivation
      1. *-commutative18.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot y}} \]
    9. Simplified18.7%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{z \cdot y}} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification17.1%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 1.5 \cdot 10^{-261}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot z}\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 35.4% accurate, 1.1× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x} \end{array} \]
NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* 2.0 (sqrt (* y x))))
assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 2.0 * sqrt((y * x));
}
NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = 2.0d0 * sqrt((y * x))
end function
assert x < y && y < z;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 2.0 * Math.sqrt((y * x));
}
[x, y, z] = sort([x, y, z])
def code(x, y, z):
	return 2.0 * math.sqrt((y * x))
x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(y * x)))
end
x, y, z = num2cell(sort([x, y, z])){:}
function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((y * x));
end
NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}
[x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\
\\
2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 65.4%

    \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate-+l+65.4%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
    2. *-commutative65.4%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)} \]
    3. *-commutative65.4%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]
    4. *-commutative65.4%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(z \cdot x + \color{blue}{z \cdot y}\right)} \]
    5. +-commutative65.4%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right)}} \]
    6. +-commutative65.4%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right) + y \cdot x}} \]
    7. associate-+l+65.4%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot y + \left(z \cdot x + y \cdot x\right)}} \]
    8. *-commutative65.4%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot z} + y \cdot x\right)} \]
    9. *-commutative65.4%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + \color{blue}{x \cdot y}\right)} \]
    10. +-commutative65.4%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right) + z \cdot y}} \]
    11. +-commutative65.4%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right)} + z \cdot y} \]
    12. *-commutative65.4%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + \color{blue}{y \cdot z}} \]
    13. associate-+l+65.4%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
    14. +-commutative65.4%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]
    15. distribute-rgt-in65.4%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
  3. Simplified65.4%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
  4. Add Preprocessing
  5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 22.6%

    \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{x \cdot y}} \]
  6. Step-by-step derivation
    1. *-commutative22.6%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot x}} \]
  7. Simplified22.6%

    \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{y \cdot x}} \]
  8. Add Preprocessing

Developer target: 82.5% accurate, 0.1× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := 0.25 \cdot \left(\left({y}^{-0.75} \cdot \left({z}^{-0.75} \cdot x\right)\right) \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) + {z}^{0.25} \cdot {y}^{0.25}\\ \mathbf{if}\;z < 7.636950090573675 \cdot 10^{+176}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x + y\right) \cdot z + x \cdot y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(t\_0 \cdot t\_0\right) \cdot 2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0
         (+
          (* 0.25 (* (* (pow y -0.75) (* (pow z -0.75) x)) (+ y z)))
          (* (pow z 0.25) (pow y 0.25)))))
   (if (< z 7.636950090573675e+176)
     (* 2.0 (sqrt (+ (* (+ x y) z) (* x y))))
     (* (* t_0 t_0) 2.0))))
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = (0.25 * ((pow(y, -0.75) * (pow(z, -0.75) * x)) * (y + z))) + (pow(z, 0.25) * pow(y, 0.25));
	double tmp;
	if (z < 7.636950090573675e+176) {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((((x + y) * z) + (x * y)));
	} else {
		tmp = (t_0 * t_0) * 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = (0.25d0 * (((y ** (-0.75d0)) * ((z ** (-0.75d0)) * x)) * (y + z))) + ((z ** 0.25d0) * (y ** 0.25d0))
    if (z < 7.636950090573675d+176) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * sqrt((((x + y) * z) + (x * y)))
    else
        tmp = (t_0 * t_0) * 2.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = (0.25 * ((Math.pow(y, -0.75) * (Math.pow(z, -0.75) * x)) * (y + z))) + (Math.pow(z, 0.25) * Math.pow(y, 0.25));
	double tmp;
	if (z < 7.636950090573675e+176) {
		tmp = 2.0 * Math.sqrt((((x + y) * z) + (x * y)));
	} else {
		tmp = (t_0 * t_0) * 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(x, y, z):
	t_0 = (0.25 * ((math.pow(y, -0.75) * (math.pow(z, -0.75) * x)) * (y + z))) + (math.pow(z, 0.25) * math.pow(y, 0.25))
	tmp = 0
	if z < 7.636950090573675e+176:
		tmp = 2.0 * math.sqrt((((x + y) * z) + (x * y)))
	else:
		tmp = (t_0 * t_0) * 2.0
	return tmp
function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(0.25 * Float64(Float64((y ^ -0.75) * Float64((z ^ -0.75) * x)) * Float64(y + z))) + Float64((z ^ 0.25) * (y ^ 0.25)))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z < 7.636950090573675e+176)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(Float64(Float64(x + y) * z) + Float64(x * y))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(t_0 * t_0) * 2.0);
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = (0.25 * (((y ^ -0.75) * ((z ^ -0.75) * x)) * (y + z))) + ((z ^ 0.25) * (y ^ 0.25));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z < 7.636950090573675e+176)
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((((x + y) * z) + (x * y)));
	else
		tmp = (t_0 * t_0) * 2.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(0.25 * N[(N[(N[Power[y, -0.75], $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Power[z, -0.75], $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[Power[z, 0.25], $MachinePrecision] * N[Power[y, 0.25], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[Less[z, 7.636950090573675e+176], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(t$95$0 * t$95$0), $MachinePrecision] * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := 0.25 \cdot \left(\left({y}^{-0.75} \cdot \left({z}^{-0.75} \cdot x\right)\right) \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) + {z}^{0.25} \cdot {y}^{0.25}\\
\mathbf{if}\;z < 7.636950090573675 \cdot 10^{+176}:\\
\;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x + y\right) \cdot z + x \cdot y}\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;\left(t\_0 \cdot t\_0\right) \cdot 2\\


\end{array}
\end{array}

Reproduce

?
herbie shell --seed 2024103 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Diagrams.TwoD.Apollonian:descartes from diagrams-contrib-1.3.0.5"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (if (< z 7.636950090573675e+176) (* 2.0 (sqrt (+ (* (+ x y) z) (* x y)))) (* (* (+ (* 0.25 (* (* (pow y -0.75) (* (pow z -0.75) x)) (+ y z))) (* (pow z 0.25) (pow y 0.25))) (+ (* 0.25 (* (* (pow y -0.75) (* (pow z -0.75) x)) (+ y z))) (* (pow z 0.25) (pow y 0.25)))) 2.0))

  (* 2.0 (sqrt (+ (+ (* x y) (* x z)) (* y z)))))