Numeric.AD.Rank1.Halley:findZero from ad-4.2.4

Percentage Accurate: 82.4% → 95.3%

Time: 9.0s

Alternatives: 5

Speedup: 1.1×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- x (/ (* (* y 2.0) z) (- (* (* z 2.0) z) (* y t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (((y * 2.0) * z) / (((z * 2.0) * z) - (y * t)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x - (((y * 2.0d0) * z) / (((z * 2.0d0) * z) - (y * t)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (((y * 2.0) * z) / (((z * 2.0) * z) - (y * t)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x - (((y * 2.0) * z) / (((z * 2.0) * z) - (y * t)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x - Float64(Float64(Float64(y * 2.0) * z) / Float64(Float64(Float64(z * 2.0) * z) - Float64(y * t))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x - (((y * 2.0) * z) / (((z * 2.0) * z) - (y * t)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x - N[(N[(N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(N[(z * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 82.4% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- x (/ (* (* y 2.0) z) (- (* (* z 2.0) z) (* y t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (((y * 2.0) * z) / (((z * 2.0) * z) - (y * t)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x - (((y * 2.0d0) * z) / (((z * 2.0d0) * z) - (y * t)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (((y * 2.0) * z) / (((z * 2.0) * z) - (y * t)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x - (((y * 2.0) * z) / (((z * 2.0) * z) - (y * t)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x - Float64(Float64(Float64(y * 2.0) * z) / Float64(Float64(Float64(z * 2.0) * z) - Float64(y * t))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x - (((y * 2.0) * z) / (((z * 2.0) * z) - (y * t)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x - N[(N[(N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(N[(z * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 95.3% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{z \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right) - y \cdot t} \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+195}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \frac{y \cdot 2}{y \cdot t - 2 \cdot {z}^{2}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y}{z}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (/ (* (* y 2.0) z) (- (* z (* 2.0 z)) (* y t))) 5e+195)
   (+ x (* z (/ (* y 2.0) (- (* y t) (* 2.0 (pow z 2.0))))))
   (- x (/ y z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((((y * 2.0) * z) / ((z * (2.0 * z)) - (y * t))) <= 5e+195) {
		tmp = x + (z * ((y * 2.0) / ((y * t) - (2.0 * pow(z, 2.0)))));
	} else {
		tmp = x - (y / z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((((y * 2.0d0) * z) / ((z * (2.0d0 * z)) - (y * t))) <= 5d+195) then
        tmp = x + (z * ((y * 2.0d0) / ((y * t) - (2.0d0 * (z ** 2.0d0)))))
    else
        tmp = x - (y / z)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((((y * 2.0) * z) / ((z * (2.0 * z)) - (y * t))) <= 5e+195) {
		tmp = x + (z * ((y * 2.0) / ((y * t) - (2.0 * Math.pow(z, 2.0)))));
	} else {
		tmp = x - (y / z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (((y * 2.0) * z) / ((z * (2.0 * z)) - (y * t))) <= 5e+195:
		tmp = x + (z * ((y * 2.0) / ((y * t) - (2.0 * math.pow(z, 2.0)))))
	else:
		tmp = x - (y / z)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(Float64(Float64(y * 2.0) * z) / Float64(Float64(z * Float64(2.0 * z)) - Float64(y * t))) <= 5e+195)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(Float64(y * 2.0) / Float64(Float64(y * t) - Float64(2.0 * (z ^ 2.0))))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(y / z));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((((y * 2.0) * z) / ((z * (2.0 * z)) - (y * t))) <= 5e+195)
		tmp = x + (z * ((y * 2.0) / ((y * t) - (2.0 * (z ^ 2.0)))));
	else
		tmp = x - (y / z);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[N[(N[(N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(z * N[(2.0 * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 5e+195], N[(x + N[(z * N[(N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(y * t), $MachinePrecision] - N[(2.0 * N[Power[z, 2.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x - N[(y / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (/.f64 (*.f64 (*.f64 y #s(literal 2 binary64)) z) (-.f64 (*.f64 (*.f64 z #s(literal 2 binary64)) z) (*.f64 y t))) < 4.9999999999999998e195

   1. Initial program 95.7%

      \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 95.7%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y \cdot 2\right)}}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]

      2. associate-*r* 95.7%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{z \cdot \left(y \cdot 2\right)}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right)} - y \cdot t} \]

      3. associate-/l* 97.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{z \cdot \frac{y \cdot 2}{z \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right) - y \cdot t}} \]

      4. *-commutative 97.0%

         \[\leadsto x - z \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{2 \cdot y}}{z \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right) - y \cdot t} \]

      5. *-commutative 97.0%

         \[\leadsto x - z \cdot \frac{2 \cdot y}{\color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot z\right) \cdot z} - y \cdot t} \]

      6. associate-*l* 97.0%

         \[\leadsto x - z \cdot \frac{2 \cdot y}{\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right)} - y \cdot t} \]

      7. pow2 97.0%

         \[\leadsto x - z \cdot \frac{2 \cdot y}{2 \cdot \color{blue}{{z}^{2}} - y \cdot t} \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 97.0%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{z \cdot \frac{2 \cdot y}{2 \cdot {z}^{2} - y \cdot t}} \]

   if 4.9999999999999998e195 < (/.f64 (*.f64 (*.f64 y #s(literal 2 binary64)) z) (-.f64 (*.f64 (*.f64 z #s(literal 2 binary64)) z) (*.f64 y t)))

   1. Initial program 0.4%

      \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]

   3. Simplified 36.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot \frac{z}{z \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right) - y \cdot t}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 70.7%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{z}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 94.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{z \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right) - y \cdot t} \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+195}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \frac{y \cdot 2}{y \cdot t - 2 \cdot {z}^{2}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y}{z}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 94.6% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := z \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;\frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{t\_1 - y \cdot t} \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+195}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot \frac{z}{y \cdot t - t\_1}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y}{z}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* z (* 2.0 z))))
   (if (<= (/ (* (* y 2.0) z) (- t_1 (* y t))) 5e+195)
     (+ x (* (* y 2.0) (/ z (- (* y t) t_1))))
     (- x (/ y z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = z * (2.0 * z);
	double tmp;
	if ((((y * 2.0) * z) / (t_1 - (y * t))) <= 5e+195) {
		tmp = x + ((y * 2.0) * (z / ((y * t) - t_1)));
	} else {
		tmp = x - (y / z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = z * (2.0d0 * z)
    if ((((y * 2.0d0) * z) / (t_1 - (y * t))) <= 5d+195) then
        tmp = x + ((y * 2.0d0) * (z / ((y * t) - t_1)))
    else
        tmp = x - (y / z)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = z * (2.0 * z);
	double tmp;
	if ((((y * 2.0) * z) / (t_1 - (y * t))) <= 5e+195) {
		tmp = x + ((y * 2.0) * (z / ((y * t) - t_1)));
	} else {
		tmp = x - (y / z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	t_1 = z * (2.0 * z)
	tmp = 0
	if (((y * 2.0) * z) / (t_1 - (y * t))) <= 5e+195:
		tmp = x + ((y * 2.0) * (z / ((y * t) - t_1)))
	else:
		tmp = x - (y / z)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = Float64(z * Float64(2.0 * z))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(Float64(Float64(y * 2.0) * z) / Float64(t_1 - Float64(y * t))) <= 5e+195)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * 2.0) * Float64(z / Float64(Float64(y * t) - t_1))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(y / z));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = z * (2.0 * z);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((((y * 2.0) * z) / (t_1 - (y * t))) <= 5e+195)
		tmp = x + ((y * 2.0) * (z / ((y * t) - t_1)));
	else
		tmp = x - (y / z);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(z * N[(2.0 * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(N[(N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] / N[(t$95$1 - N[(y * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 5e+195], N[(x + N[(N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(z / N[(N[(y * t), $MachinePrecision] - t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x - N[(y / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (/.f64 (*.f64 (*.f64 y #s(literal 2 binary64)) z) (-.f64 (*.f64 (*.f64 z #s(literal 2 binary64)) z) (*.f64 y t))) < 4.9999999999999998e195

   1. Initial program 95.7%

      \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]

   3. Simplified 97.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot \frac{z}{z \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right) - y \cdot t}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   if 4.9999999999999998e195 < (/.f64 (*.f64 (*.f64 y #s(literal 2 binary64)) z) (-.f64 (*.f64 (*.f64 z #s(literal 2 binary64)) z) (*.f64 y t)))

   1. Initial program 0.4%

      \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]

   3. Simplified 36.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot \frac{z}{z \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right) - y \cdot t}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 70.7%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{z}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 94.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{z \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right) - y \cdot t} \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+195}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot \frac{z}{y \cdot t - z \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y}{z}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 89.5% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -8 \cdot 10^{-24} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 2.1 \cdot 10^{-30}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y}{z}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{z \cdot -2}{t}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -8e-24) (not (<= z 2.1e-30)))
   (- x (/ y z))
   (- x (/ (* z -2.0) t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -8e-24) || !(z <= 2.1e-30)) {
		tmp = x - (y / z);
	} else {
		tmp = x - ((z * -2.0) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-8d-24)) .or. (.not. (z <= 2.1d-30))) then
        tmp = x - (y / z)
    else
        tmp = x - ((z * (-2.0d0)) / t)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -8e-24) || !(z <= 2.1e-30)) {
		tmp = x - (y / z);
	} else {
		tmp = x - ((z * -2.0) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -8e-24) or not (z <= 2.1e-30):
		tmp = x - (y / z)
	else:
		tmp = x - ((z * -2.0) / t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -8e-24) || !(z <= 2.1e-30))
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(y / z));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(Float64(z * -2.0) / t));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -8e-24) || ~((z <= 2.1e-30)))
		tmp = x - (y / z);
	else
		tmp = x - ((z * -2.0) / t);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -8e-24], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 2.1e-30]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x - N[(y / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x - N[(N[(z * -2.0), $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -7.99999999999999939e-24 or 2.1000000000000002e-30 < z

   1. Initial program 82.1%

      \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]

   3. Simplified 90.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot \frac{z}{z \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right) - y \cdot t}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 89.2%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{z}} \]

   if -7.99999999999999939e-24 < z < 2.1000000000000002e-30

   1. Initial program 89.2%

      \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]

   3. Simplified 89.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot \frac{z}{z \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right) - y \cdot t}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 91.6%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{-2 \cdot \frac{z}{t}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 91.6%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{-2 \cdot z}{t}} \]

      2. *-commutative 91.6%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot -2}}{t} \]

   7. Simplified 91.6%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{z \cdot -2}{t}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 90.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -8 \cdot 10^{-24} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 2.1 \cdot 10^{-30}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y}{z}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{z \cdot -2}{t}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 82.5% accurate, 1.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -3.3 \cdot 10^{-24} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 6.3 \cdot 10^{-12}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y}{z}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -3.3e-24) (not (<= z 6.3e-12))) (- x (/ y z)) x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -3.3e-24) || !(z <= 6.3e-12)) {
		tmp = x - (y / z);
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-3.3d-24)) .or. (.not. (z <= 6.3d-12))) then
        tmp = x - (y / z)
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -3.3e-24) || !(z <= 6.3e-12)) {
		tmp = x - (y / z);
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -3.3e-24) or not (z <= 6.3e-12):
		tmp = x - (y / z)
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -3.3e-24) || !(z <= 6.3e-12))
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(y / z));
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -3.3e-24) || ~((z <= 6.3e-12)))
		tmp = x - (y / z);
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -3.3e-24], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 6.3e-12]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x - N[(y / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], x]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -3.29999999999999984e-24 or 6.3000000000000002e-12 < z

   1. Initial program 81.4%

      \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]

   3. Simplified 90.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot \frac{z}{z \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right) - y \cdot t}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 89.5%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{z}} \]

   if -3.29999999999999984e-24 < z < 6.3000000000000002e-12

   1. Initial program 89.8%

      \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]

   3. Simplified 88.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \frac{2}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot -2, y \cdot t\right)}, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 78.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 85.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -3.3 \cdot 10^{-24} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 6.3 \cdot 10^{-12}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y}{z}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 75.6% accurate, 17.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 84.9%

   \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]

3. Simplified 90.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \frac{2}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot -2, y \cdot t\right)}, x\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 74.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Developer target: 99.9% accurate, 1.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x - \frac{1}{\frac{z}{y} - \frac{\frac{t}{2}}{z}} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- x (/ 1.0 (- (/ z y) (/ (/ t 2.0) z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (1.0 / ((z / y) - ((t / 2.0) / z)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x - (1.0d0 / ((z / y) - ((t / 2.0d0) / z)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (1.0 / ((z / y) - ((t / 2.0) / z)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x - (1.0 / ((z / y) - ((t / 2.0) / z)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x - Float64(1.0 / Float64(Float64(z / y) - Float64(Float64(t / 2.0) / z))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x - (1.0 / ((z / y) - ((t / 2.0) / z)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x - N[(1.0 / N[(N[(z / y), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(t / 2.0), $MachinePrecision] / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024103 
(FPCore (x y z t)
  :name "Numeric.AD.Rank1.Halley:findZero from ad-4.2.4"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (- x (/ 1.0 (- (/ z y) (/ (/ t 2.0) z))))

  (- x (/ (* (* y 2.0) z) (- (* (* z 2.0) z) (* y t)))))